HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1994 0615 CC REG ITEM 09A/25,
ITEIMIMMONOMMENOM
AGENDA REPORT
C =TY OF MOORPARK P!oo ^ ^� ^�, CgUFO� ^,�q
TO: The Honorable City Council
` ^ of l�9
FROM: Ken Gilbert, Director of Public Works ACTION:
DATE: May 23, 1994 (Council Meeting 6 -1 -94)
s" BY i
SUBJECT: Consider Making Certain Changes to AD84 -2
and Confirming the Assessments for
Fiscal Year 1994/95
OVERVIEW /'
;.a
This presents for approval a Resolution making certain cha
Assessment District AD84 -2 and confirming the assessments fc isc
Year 1994/95. Certain information in support of said propose
changes and proposed assessments s attached hereto and identified
as follows:
List of Exhibits
Exhibit "A":
Exhibit "B":
Exhibit "C":
Exhibit "D ":
Exhibit "E":
Exhibit "F":
Exhibit "G":
Exhibit "H":
Exhibit "I ":
BACKGROUND
Assessment Summary
Fund Activity Summary
Zone Activity Summary
Preliminary Budget for FY 1994/95
Capital Improvement Project Summary
Street Light, Cost Summary
Engineer's Report
Public Hearing Noti-ce
Resolution
Assessment District 84 -2 was formed in 1984 pursuant to the
provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972." This
assessment district was established to allow for the funding of
street lighting and parkway /median maintenance and improvement
expenses through the levying of assessments as provided for in the
act. As set forth in the Engineer's Report (Exhibit "G"), there are
two types of district expenses, generally described as follows:
• those expenses determined to be of general benefit to the
community, which are spread to all of the lots in the City; and,
• those expenses for the construction and maintenance of
improvements determined to b(, of benefit to the properties
within a number of identified .,ones, which are spread to all of
the lots within each zone.
ad84_95.apr
"w. i
Assessment District 84-2
June 1, 1994
Page 2
The Citywide expenses are distributed to all of the properties in
the City by means of a formula designed to spread said costs on the
basis of benefit. The benefit spread formula for street lighting
identifies a number of factors ( including lighting intensity,
security, people use, etc. ) which are associated with benefits
derived, and then weights those factors by land use as a means to
determining benefits derived. The benefit spread formula for
Citywide landscaping distributes costs equally to all non-exempt
properties in the City.
Except for Zones 7 and 9, the zone expenses are distributed equally
between the non-exempt parcels in each zone. In that the sizes of
the lots in Zones 7 and 9 vary considerably, the expenses for those
zones are spread to each non-exempt parcel via a per acre
assessment.
The City must annually act to levy the lighting and landscape
maintenance assessments. Said assessments have been levied each
year since the formation of the •listrict.
In accordance with the requirements of the above mentioned act, the
City Council has taken a number of actions in recent months in
preparation for considering the levy of assessments for Parks
Maintenance for FY 1994/95. Those actions are summarized as
follows:
1. On January 5, 1994 , the City Council adopted Resolution No. 94-
994 stating its intent to take the subject actions.
2. Also on that date, the City _ouncil selected Dwight French and
Associates to prepare the Engineer' s Reports for AD84-2.
3 . On April 6, 1994, the City council adopted Resolution No. 94-
1026 making certain findings and taking certain actions
including the following:
- approving, subject to change, the Engineers' Report for
AD84-2 for FY 1994/95;
- stating intent to make certain changes to AD84-2:
- setting 7:00 p.m. on May : 6, 1994, as the time and date of a
Public Meeting for the purpose of allowing the public an
opportunity to meet with 'it,, staff to question and discuss
the proposed assessments;
• setting 7:00 p.m. on June 1 , 1994 , as the time and date of a
Public Hearing to conside - the subject actions; and
.114,_95..1[
Assessment District 84-2
June 1 , 1994
Page 3
• directing that Notice of saJd meetings be sent to the owners
of all affected properties, stating the amount of the
assessment levied for FY 1993/94 , the amount of the proposed
increase in the assessment amount and the total amount of the
assessments proposed for FY 1994/95 .
DISCUSSION
A. Tentative Assessment Summary
The amounts of the proposed assessments for AD 84-2 for FY
1994/95 are set forth in Exhibit 'A' . A summary of that
information is as follows:
1. City-Wide Assessment -- Those expenses considered to be of
general benefit to the community include street lighting
expenses and landscape maintenance expenses for a number of
parkways and medians. A comparison of the annual City-wide
assessment for a single-fam . ly lot is as follows:
Actual Proposed
Elements FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95
Landscape Maintenance $11.45 $16.40
Street Lighting $21.55 $20.64
Total $ 33. 00 $37.04
2. Zone of Benefit Assessments -- Those expenses for the
maintenance of improvements determined to be of benefit to
the properties within an identified zone, are spread to all
of the lots within that zone A re-cap of the proposed
annual assessment for each 'on' of Benefit is as follows:
rFY 1993;94 ) FY 1994/95
dumber To.al Per Lot Total Per Lot
Zone Tract of Lots Assessment Assessment Assessment Assessment
1 2851 73 4.7-1f :33.92 4,131 56.59
2 2865 622 6'1 28.41 59,367 95.45
3 3032 265 41E 5.30 846 3.20
4 3274 129 1.8 93.94 0 0
5 3019/3525 217 31C 79.91 37,338 172.06
•d9495..pr
Assessment District 84-2
June 1 , 1994
Page 4
FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95
Number Total Per Lot Total Per Lot
Gone Tract of Lots Assessment Assessment Assessment Assessment
6 3306 22 r.7 30.82 242 11.00
7 Industrial Park 92 ,08' 33.55 10,581 111.46
NE of L. A. Ave & per acre
Gabbert Rd
8a City (T-4340, 497 j,22: 20.53
T-4341 & T-4342)
693 10,223 14.75
8b Some Acres 200 i,22: 51.11 10,223 51.11
9 Condor Parkway 11 ( 0 6,000 121.92
per acre
3. New Zone -- On December 15, 1993, the City Council reviewed
an alignment study prepared for Virginia Colony Drive and
decided to leave the alignment as it now exists. As a part
of that action, the City Council directed staff to take steps
to enable the City Council to consider the creation of a new
Zone of Benefit to include the properties within the
Industrial Park located on Condor Drive. Said new Zone of
Benefit was to be established to allow for the levy of
assessments on those properties to fund the improvement and
maintenance of the unimproved parkway located at the
northwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Virginia Colony
Place. As you may recall, the Conditions of Approval for the
Industrial Park required the developer to construct and
maintain landscape improvements in this parkway and other
areas in the industrial park complex. However, the POA
established for this area failed to provide for the proper
maintenance of these landscape improvements and the
landscaping eventually died The Engineer's Report includes
the addition of Zone 9 to levy assessments for the
improvement and maintenance of this area. It is recommended
that a $6 ,000 improvement assessment be levied for the
construction and maintenance of the parkway improvements
during FY 1994/95. Please note that, pursuant to the
provisions of the Act, the property in Zone 9 which is owned
by the Moorpark Unified ' chool District is exempt from
assessments .
eds. 95.apr
Assessment District 84-2
June 1, 1994
Page 5
4. Per Acre Assessment -- There is a considerable variation in
the size of the industrial properties located in Zone 9. It
is recommended, therefore, that the total assessment for
Zone 9 be spread to all et the parcels in Zone 9 on a per
acre basis. It is recommended that the total assessment to
be levied on the industrial properties located within Zone 7
also be spread to the parcels in that Zone in the same
manner. A tentative listing of the assessment amounts for
the parcels in Zones 7 and 9 are ; fisted in Exhibit 'A' .
5. Zone Activity -- A more detailed description of the Fund
Activity for each Zone of Benefit is set forth below in
SECTION D of this report .
B. Fund Activity
Attached for your information as Exhibit 'B' , is a summary of
the Fund Activity for AD 84-2 for FY 1992/93, FY 1993/94 and
FY 1994/95. The amount of the FY 1994/95 revenue identified in
Exhibit 'B' is the amount required to fund the expenditures
summarized in the Preliminary Budget attached as Exhibit 'D' .
[Exhibit 'D' is discussed in more detail below. ] This revenue
requirement was the basis for determining the proposed FY
1994/95 assessments summarizer in Exhibit 'A' .
C. Zone Activity Summary
Attached as Exhibit 'C' is a summary of the revenues and
expenditures for each Zone or Benefit over the past several
years. This exhibit shows the year-end surplus and/or deficit
for each zone, carried over to the following year. A discussion
of the Fund Activity for each Zone is as follows:
Zone 1: The amount of the assessment has been reduced from
$9,776 to $4 , 131 . This is due to a $1 ,944 carry over resulting
in part from an over estimate of FY 1993/94 expenses.
Zone 2:
• Maintenance Deficit -- 'I tie amount of the FY 1992/93
maintenance assessment was 350 ,500. Last year at this time,
it was thought that this assessment amount was too high and
that it would result in an FY 1993/94 Beginning Balance of
$9,671. Accordingly, the FY 1993 .94 assessment was reduced
considerably to only ;] " 61 . The actual FY 1993/94
ade4 y5.apr
Assessment District 84-2
June 1, 1994
Page 6
Beginning Balance turned .Alt to be only $4 ,609. This
combined with current year-end expenditures expected to be
more than $4,000 higher than the amount budgeted, is
anticipated to result in a year-end deficit of $9,207. This
deficit, added to the FY 1994/95 projected expenditures will
require a FY 1994/95 assessment of $43 ,882.
- pebris Basin Maintenance -- I'he projected FY 1994/95 expenses
include an amount of $1,000 for the maintenance of the debris
basins located on the south perimeter of Tract 2865.
• Improvement Deficit -- This year the City undertook and
completed the restoration of the Tierra Rejada Slope east of
Peach Hill Road and the construction of the Sunnyslope Debris
Basin Access Road. The cost of these two projects exceeded
the amount of the available improvements assessments by
$9,265. Pursuant to the direction of the City Council, it is
proposed that this improvement deficit be recovered by adding
a like amount to the pr.opnseci Zcne 2 assessments for FY
1994/95.
• Additional Improvement Assessment -- It is also proposed that
an additional assessment of $10 per lot ($6,220 annual total)
be levied for three years to fund the construction of parkway
improvements on the north side of Tierra Rejada Road west of
Spring Road.
Zone 3: The proposed FY 1994 '95 assessment is slightly less
than last year due to a beginning balance which was higher than
expected.
Zone 4: Last year at this time, it was thought that FY 1993/94
Beginning Balance would show a deficit of $3,685. Accordingly,
the FY 1993/94 assessment was increased to $12,118, a
considerable increase over the prior year assessment of $4, 212.
The actual FY 1993/94 Beginning Balance turned out to be a
positive fund balance of $774 . This increase in available
funds, combined with the fact that current year-end expenditures
are expected to be more than $4 ,400 less than the amount
budgeted, will result in a year-pend positive fund balance of
$8,901. In that the estimated FY 1994 /95 expenditures are only
$4,059, it is anticipated that there will be a FY 1994/95 year-
end balance of $4 , 806. Accordi ,q " , nc FY 1994/95 assessment is
proposed.
eau s5.opr
Assessment District 84-2
June 1, 1994
Page 7
Zone 5: Based on past year actual costs, the amount budgeted
for Zone 5 expenses in FY 1993 '94 was too low. This, combined
with unanticipated irrigation water costs, has resulted in FY
1993/94 expenditures estimated to be approximately $8,000 more
than the amount budgeted. 11 addition, the anticipated FY
1993/94 Beginning Balance is approximately $1 ,000 less than
expected. It is anticipated that these factors will result in
a FY 1993/94 year-end deficit of $8, 993. This deficit added to
the FY 1994/95 projected expenditures will require a FY 1994/95
assessment of $37, 338.
Zone 6: Although the projected expenses are over $800, the
assessment amount is only $242 lue to a carry over surplus from
last year.
Zone 7: FY 1993/94 expenditures are anticipated to be
approximately $3,000 more than the amount budgeted. This
combined with an anticipated FY 1993/94 Beginning Balance which
is approximately $300 less than expected, will result in a FY
1993/94 year-end deficit of $3 , 206. This deficit, added to the
FY 1994/95 projected expenditures will require a FY 1994/95
assessment of $10 ,581, a considrah.le increase over prior years.
Zone 8: This Zone provides for the construction and maintenance
of the Buffer Area at the west end of Tract 4341. The costs are
shared on a fifty-fifty basis between the properties in the Home
Acres area and all of the resiLiential property in Tracts 4340,
4341 and 4342. Commercial prar.)er*y his been excluded from the
boundaries of this Zone.
• Addition of Multi-Family Residential Units -- In prior years
only the single-family residential lots in Tracts 4340, 4341
and 4342 were assessed. Consistent with the original intent,
it is recommended that the City portion of the Zone 8
assessment be spread to all ,f the approved residential units
in the affected area. The total number of residential units
approved for this area is a:; follows:
* Single Family resident Lal 497
* Multi-family re.;.identi it 196
Total 693
- Improvement Assessments -- It is proposed that the total
assessment remain unchanged, but that $1,200 of that
assessment be identified as a maintenance assessment. The
remainder of the improvement assessment is anticipated to
provide sufficient fusidE to •:onstruct the proposed
604 95.apr
Assessment District 84-2
June 1 , 1994
Page 8
improvements. Any surplus improvement assessment will be
used to fund future mainten•ince costs.
• Maintenance Assessment -- I*- is proposed that a maintenance
assessment in the amount of $1 ,200 be levied on the
properties in this Zone for the first time. This amount is
based on an estimated mairtenance and utility cost for a
three (3) month period.
Zone 9: As discussed above, an improvement assessment in the
amount of $6,000 is proposed to be levied on the properties
within the Condor Drive Industrial Park. It is proposed that
these parkway improvements be -onstructed during FY 1994/95.
D. Preliminary Budget for FY 1994,95
Attached as Exhibit 'D' is a copy of the preliminary budget for
Parkway Lighting and Landscapi-zg for FY 1994/95 .
1 . Operations & Maintenance (O&M) -- The budget amount proposed
for O&M for FY 1994/95 ( $385, 780) is $26,669 more than the
approved O&M Budget for FY ..993/94 ($359,111) . This amount
of increase is roughly comparable to the proposed increase in
the Citywide assessment shown on page 2 of Exhibit 'A' . Said
increase in expenditures it the result of adding four new
landscaped parkways to the ,mprovements to be maintained by
AD 84-2. Those added areas are listed as follows:
• Prkwy: L. A. Ave. / Millard St . .
• Prkwy: L. A. Ave. / Shasta Ave. :
• Prkwy: Poindexter / Sierra Ave. : and,
• Prkwy: E/S Spring Rd. , £ 0 Peacn Hill Rd.
2. City-wide Landscape Improvements -- A complete list of the
City-wide landscape improvements Maintained by AD 84-2 is
listed as follows:
• Prkwy: L. A. Ave. / Mil.- rd St. .
• Prkwy: L. A. Ave. / Shasta Ave. :
• Prkwy: Poindexter / Sierra Ave. : and,
• Prkwy: E/S Spring Rd. , S 0 Peacn Hill Rd.
• Prkwy: W/S Collins N/0 Campus Park Dr. ;
• Median: Campus Park Dr. Collins to Pecan) ;
• Median: Campus Park Dr. Pecan to Julliard) ;
• Prkwy: S/W Cor. Spring & Peach iill;
• Prkwy: E/S Peach Hill N/ Monte Vista Park;
• Median: Tierra Rejada Pc .prirl to L. A. Ave. ) :
,aa4 95.apr
Assessment District 84-2
June 1, 1994
Page 9
3. Street Lighting -- The cost of street lighting is included in
the utility costs shown in Exhibit 'D' . The proposed cost
for street lighting for FY .994/95 is $190,000 (see Exhibit
'F' for details) .
4. Zones of Benefit -- The cost of maintaining the landscaping
funded by Zones of Benefit are included in the total budget
set forth in Exhibit 'D' . For details regarding costs refer
to Exhibit 'C' .
E. Maintenance Delivery Alternatives
During the public hearings to consider the 1993/94 assessments
for the Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District (AD 84-2) ,
the City Council directed staff to identify alternatives for
performing landscaped maintenance in identified zones of
benefit. This direction was given as a result of input from a
resident within one of the zones of benefit who inquired whether
it would be feasible for the homeowners in a particular zone of
benefit to contract for their -wn landscape maintenance in the
identified areas.
The specific area in question is Zone of Benefit #5, which
includes Tract 3019 and 3025, the north and south Tierra Rejada
parkways, the south slopes and the west side parkways on Peach
Hill Road. The City conditioned the original development to be
included in AD 84-2 as a Zone )f Benefit.
The available alternatives are
1. Vacate the maintenance easement and allow the HOA to be
responsible for the maintenance of all identified landscaped
areas. If the City wants to reserve the ability to retake
responsibility for maintenance, the City could include
language in the deed so that the property could revert back
to the city if the landscaping was not maintained as the City
determined appropriate ( power of termination clause) .
2. It would be possible to enter into a maintenance agreement
with the HOA for them to be responsible for their own
landscaped maintenance, whereby the HOA would sub-contract a
landscape maintenance company to do the actual labor. To
insure consistency in the le 'el of maintenance, the agreement
0404_95.
Assessment District 84-2
June 1, 1994
Page 10
would need to be written similar to the City's agreement with
the same standards that the City currently has in its
contract. The HOA would need to indemnify the City and
provide insurance coverage.
3. Continue as is, with the Cty assessing the homeowners in
that zone of benefit per th.. conditions of approval.
4. Allow the maintenance resporsitilities to revert back to the
individual property owners .
5. Some combination of #1 and -4 , above.
If the Zones of Benefit were a .lowed to withdraw from AD 84-2,
the individual zones and the overall City maintenance program
would lose the benefits of economy of scale. Currently the City
requires only about 10% of one person to administer the contract
for all of the landscaped areas in AD 84-2. The quality of
maintenance would also be more difficult to maintain. Two
slopes maintained by an HOA along Campus Park Drive and Spring
Road are examples of a lower level of maintenance compared to
City administered areas. Also, when there is a problem such as
a slope failure, the City administrated district has a built-in
mechanism to provide for repairs . In addition, if there is a
funding shortfall to make a major repair, the City can more
easily resolve such a situation as was the case with the slope
failure on the Tierra Rejada P 'ad slone.
Usually, the Zones of Benefit are created as a result of a
condition of development. The primary purpose is to insure
consistent and quality maintenance to mitigate the impact of
development and insure continued maintenance to the individual
property owner, the neighborhood of the development and the
overall community. Removing areas from the assessment district
would most likely reduce the level of maintenance and negate the
desired benefits of well maintained Iindscape.
Staff does not recommend a 2haige from the present system.
F. Capital Improvements
Attached as Exhibit 'E' is a summary proposed capital
improvement projects funded by AD 84-2 .
edBB_95..pr
Assessment District 84-2
June 1 , 1994
Page 11
1. FY 1993/94: Proposed year-end capital project expenditures
are listed on page 1 of Exhibit 'F' .
a. City-wide Capital Construction: The projects to be
constructed in FY 1993/94 are .listed as follows:
• L. A. Ave. / Millard ;t. :
• L. A. Ave. / Shasta Ave. :
• Poindexter / Sierra Ave. : and,
• Spring Rd / Peach Hai L R•9 .
b. Design: In addition, design costs for future projects are
included in the year-end anticipated expenditures.
c. Total City-wide Capital Improvement Costs: The total
year-end City-wide capital improvement costs are
anticipated to be $57, 45( . This leaves an estimated year-
end capital project carry over of $46, 365.
d. Sone of Benefit Capital improvement Costs: Also recapped
here are the total Zone (:apital improvements costs for FY
1993/94 , amounting to $i ' , 9 )`_ .
e. Total Capital Improvement Costs: The total year-end
capital improvement costs for AD 84-2 is estimated to be
$125, 355 (57,450 + 67, 9( ',) .
f. Remaining Budgeted Funds : The total amount budgeted for
Citywide capital improvements was $103 , 815. As stated
above anticipated year-end expenses are $57,450 , leaving
a balance of $46 , 365 to Tarry cver to next fiscal year.
2. FY 1994/95: Proposed capital project expenditures for next
year are listed on page 2 cf Exhibit 'E' .
a. City-wide Capital Construction Projects: The projects
proposed to be constricted next year are listed as
follows:
• Medians: Princeton Ale . $40,000
• Parkway: Princeton Ave . $37,000
• Parkway: S/S Campus Jrive F/O Princeton; $30,000
• Parkway: E/S Peach (till S/O Mesa Verde; $35,000
• Parkway: S/S L. A. , re . : F, 0 T. R. Rd. ; $20.000 **
$162,000
Note: ** This project i. part.ally iunded by a prior Griffin Hones deposit.
SSC_95.mar
Assessment District 84-2
June 1, 1994
Page 12
b. Total City-ride Capital Improvement Costs: The total
recommended FY 1994/95 Budget for the above listed Capital
improvement projects is $162,000. The funding for this
level of effort is as follows:
• Prior Year Carry Over $46,365
• Prior Year Capital Project Set Aside $97,576
• Other Remaining Maintenance Surplus 518.224
$162,165
c. Deferred Projects: The following projects are recommended
to be deferred due to lack of funding:
• Parkway: Campus Park Drive, W/O Princeton Ave. ;
• Parkway: Peach Hill E/0 Mesa Verde;
• Parkway: W/S Spring, S/O Peach Hill Rd. ; and,
• Parkway: W/S Tierra Rejada Rd, S/0 L. A. Ave.
d. Zone of Benefit Capital Improvement Costs: Also recapped
here is the proposed construction of the Home Ares Buffer
Area (Zone 8) for an estimated amount of $54,135. Any
surplus improvement assessments will be used to fund
future maintenance costs
e. Zone of Benefit Capital Carry Overs: The Zone 2
improvement assessment of $6,220 for future parkway
improvements to the south side of Tierra Rejada Road will
be carried over and combined with future improvement
assessments to fund these future improvements.
G. Engineer's Report
The above described expenditure information was provided to the
Assessment Engineer to be used as the basis for the preparation
of the attached Engineer's Report (Exhibit 'G' ) . Said report
sets for the proposed amoutt of the assessment for FY 1994/95
for various land use categories, along with an explanation of
the Benefit Assessment Formula and other related information.
H. Public Hearing
1. The "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" (Streets and
Highways Code) requires a public hearing to be held prior to
the annual levy of assessments for the purpose of receiving
input and to hear any protests to the proposed assessments.
OM4 Po.•pr
Assessment District 84-2
June 1, 1994
Page 13
2. If the amount of the assessments are to remain the same, the
law does not require a Notice of public hearing to be mailed
to each property being assessed. However, consistent with
past practice, it is recommended that such a notice be mailed
to the owners of all of the affected properties.
3. Notwithstanding the above mentioned policy, State law
requires that prior to considering any new or increased
assessment, a public hearing notice must be mailed to the
owners of the properties to be assessed. Said notice shall
state the amount of the existing assessment, the amount of
the proposed assessment and the amount of the proposed
increase in the assessment . The amount of the approved
estimated assessment MAY NOT EXCEED the amounts stated in the
notice. Said notice must be mailed at least forty-five (45)
days prior to the date of the hearing. In order to meet this
deadline, said Notices were postmarked and mailed prior to
April 15, 1994 .
4. State law also requires that prior to considering any new or
increased assessment a Public Meeting shall be convened to
allow the public an opportunity to discuss the proposed
increased assessment. Such 3 meeting was convened on Monday,
May 16, 1994 , at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. This
informal meeting was conducted by staff for the purpose of
providing answers to questions regarding projected program
costs and the methods used tD spread those costs to the
properties assessed. Only 1 fsw people were in attendance.
Staff responded to the quee.t:io's asked.
5. Attached as Exhibit 'H' i a copy of the Public Hearing
Notice for AD84-2 .
I. Deferred Action
The attached resolution (Exhibit "I" ) making certain changes to
Assessment District AD84-2 and confirming the assessments for
Fiscal Year 1994/95 must be adopted no later than June 30, 1994,
in order for the assessments t.) be levied. In prior years the
City Council has adopted such • esolutions concurrently with the
adoption of the budget.
ear_95. pr
Assessment District 84-2
June 1, 1994
Page 14
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council open the public hearing,
receive testimony and continue those matters to the date of the
Budget Workshops.
Subsequent to the budget workshop meetings, but no later than June
30 . 1994, staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached
Resolution No. 94- (Exhibit "I" ) making certain changes to
AD84-2 and confirming the assessme*,ts for Fiscal Year 1994/95 .
ede4.96.apz
EXHIBIT "A" (page 11 31-Mar-94
Fiscal Year 1994/95
AD 84-2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
FY 42/93 FY 93/94 FY 94/95
Description Actual Budget Proposed
1
TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENSES 4'70,763 533,912 630,815
LESS TOTAL ANTICIPATED ZONE EXPENSES ie' ,149) (84,057) (144,590)
LESS TOTAL ANTICIPATED CITY-WIDE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENST 122: ,455) (156,455) (162,000) 11
ji
PLUS PROPOSED CITYWIDE IMPROVENNET ASSESSMENTS 0 0
LESS RESERVES r,—,845) 0 0 �I
NET CITY WIDE COSTS 30(',314 293,400
i� 324,225 lj
TOTAL CITY-WIDE ASSESSMENTS 3(.314 293,400 fl 324,225 jjI
TOTAL ASSESSMENT FOR ALL CONES :28.806 82,520 }i 138,950
TOTAL ASSESSMENTS 42'+.120 375,920 463,175
!I .l
i'
EXHIBIT "A" (page 2) 18-May-94
Fiscal Year 1994/95
AD 84-2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY FY 1993'94 FY 1994/95
ASSESSMENT SUMMARY ---. --
,4 C D
SF Res SF Res
Description Assnnt(S) Tota S Assmnt($) Total ($) Notes
Citywide Assessment
33.00 29J 100 37.04 324,225 A/B : C/D
C = (AxD) / B
Zone Assessments
Per Lot Tot 11 Per Lot Total
No. i of Lots Assent($) Assmr'i$ Assmnt($) Assmnt($)
1 73 133.92 Q -6 56.59 4,131
2 622 28.41 '1 95.45 59,367
3 265 5.30 1 15 3.20 846
4 129 93.94 12 .8 0.00 0
5 217 79.9I 17 10 172.06 37,338
6 22 30.82 '3 11.00 242
7 92 33.55 ,_, ** 10,581
8 N, 20,445
(City) 498 20.53
693 14.75
(Home Acres 200 51.11 51.11
9 11 N/A N, ** 6,000
Total All Zones 32, ( 138,950
** See per parcel Acreage Assesment or : we: 4 A 3.
EXHIBIT "A" (page 31 31-$ar-94
Fiscal Year 1994/95
AD 84-2 ASSESS/LENT SUMMARY
Summary of Acreage Assessments
Total Total Per Acre Total
Zone Assessment Acres Assessment A ? S Acres Assessment Remarks
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 i1-0-061-01. 1.680 187.26
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 :1-0-061-02'h 1.160 129.30
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 • 11-0-061-035 1.160 129.30
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 • .1-0-)61-04'r 1.160 129.30
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 • .1-0-361-055 1.160 129.30
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 .1-0-061-064, 1.130 125.95
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 .1-0-+)61-075 1.060 118.15
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 i-0-061-08', 1.060 118.15
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 -.1-0-061-11- 1.060 118.15
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 1-0-061-14`. 1.170 130.41
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 1-0-1)61-15`. 2.130 237.42
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 1-0-062-064 1.170 130.41
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 1-0-062-071 1.270 141.56
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 J-0-062-161 2.750 306.53
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 1-0-062-17`. 2.830 315.44
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 • .i-('-t62-2L 2.940 327.71
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 ` 1-0-)62-23` 1.227 136.77
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 ' 1-(-062-24`: 3.072 342.42
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 ` 1-0-062-25 5.000 557.32
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 ' 1-0-062-26') 0.547 60.97
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 '..1-0-062-27': 1.100 122.61
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 !,1-0-062-28`; 1.080 120.38
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 `..i-0-062-29:• 1.260 140.45
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 4 .-0-062-30 1.330 148.25
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 F .-0-062-31'• 1.150 128.18
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 c .•0-062-34: 3.080 343.31
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 5. -0-062-3" 3.930 438.06
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 5 -0-062-38` 2.020 225.16
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 5. -0-010-03( 2.530 282.01
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 5 -0-00-04( 5.180 577.39
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 5 -0-0!0-45( 3.300 367.33
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 5 -)-0.)-48' 2.550 284.23
7 10,581.00 94.9.3 111.46 5 -3-0'0-49( 0.500 55.73
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 5 -01-0"0-50C 0.490 54.62
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 5 -0-0"'0-51C 0.490 54.62
7 10,581.00 94.92 111.46 5. -0-J`r)-520 0.520 57.96
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 5. ••0-.1:0-530 0.950 105.89
7 10,581.00 94.92 111.46 -,. -0-0:0--)4) 0.710 79.14
7 10,581.00 94.12 111.46 . -•)-0:0-'-6 1.670 186.15
7 10,581.00 94.9! 111.46 -1 1-1")-')'-') 0.360 95.86
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 -: --'--J ')-55 0.339 37,79
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 :1 '0;:)-5,5 0.239 .:6.64
7 10,581.00 ?4.93 111.46 I --,7)- 5 0.239 26.64
7 10,581.00 �4.9 :11.40 1 - 71-•i`. 1.100 122.61
EXHIBIT "A" (page 4) 31-Mar-94
Fiscal Year 1994/95
AD 84-2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
Summary of Acreage Assessments
Total Total Per Acre Total
Zone Assessment Acres Assessment A P 1 Acres Assessment Remarks
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 51 -0-0'0-61! 0.800 89.17
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 51 -0-0'0-625 1.169 130.30
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 51 -0-0"0-635 0.610 67.99
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 51 -0-070-645 0.339 37.79
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 51 -0-070-655 0.530 59.08
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 51..-0-070-665 0.469 52.28
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 511-0-070-675 0.469 52.28
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 51.-0-070-685 0.469 52.28
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 51.-0-070-+195 0.469 52.28
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 51.-0-070-'05 0.469 52.28
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 51. -0-070-'15 0.480 53.50
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 51. -0-074-11+) 0.839 93.52
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 511-0-151-065 0.510 56.85
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 A.1 -0-151-07!. 0.180 20.06
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 511 -0-151-085 0.600 66.88
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 -ii -0-15_-095 0.700 78.03
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 -11 0-15.-105 0.580 64.65
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 '11 251-115 0.680 75.80
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 511 '-:5t-125 0.550 61.31
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 ':I 1-151-135 0.650 72.45
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 t11 1-151-145 0.200 22.29
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 Al 1-151-h5 0.550 61.31
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 511 i-161-0..1 0.412 45.92
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 511 1-161-0.45 0.464 51.72
7 10,581.00 .4.93 111.46 511 1-161-055 0.324 36.11
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 511 i-161-0%5 0.292 32.55
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 511 161-(P5 0.329 36.67
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 511• '-161.0't5 0.295 32.88
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 511 1-161-105 0.274 30.54
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 5.1- -161.1.5 0.261 29.09
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 511- -151.1..•, 0.292 32.55
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 511- -1011.:'.. 0.534 59.52
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 511. --16.1.-M 0.580 64.65
7 10,581.00 54.93 111.46 ').1- -1b1 1[; 0.387 43.14
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 5.1 -161-11': 0.287 31.99 •
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 51• -161-185 0.287 31.99
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 511- -161-195 0.287 31.99
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 ,1i -161-2(;'- 0.414 46.15
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 911- -1e1-21' 0.492 54.84
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 1,11- 161-22• 0.440 49.04
7 10,581.00 91.93 111.46 !... t.-2':. 1.240 138.22
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 !-:1.- .6.'.-): 0.687 70.58
7 10,581.00 91.93 111.10 ' . -. 6'-1' 1.704 78.47
EXHIBIT "A" (page 5) 31-Har-94
Fiscal Year 1994/95
AD 84-2 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
Summary of Acreage Assessments
Total Total Per Acre Total
Zone Assessment Acres Assessment A P I Acres Assessment Remarks
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 51 -0-102-051 0.340 37.90
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 51 -0-102-061 0.530 59:08
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 51 -0-1',2-071 0.330 36:78
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 51 -0-1t2-08`- 0.440 49.04
7 10,581.00 94.93 111.46 5. -0-14.2-09° 0.340 37.90
2;. :' !ot3] 94.927 10,581.00
9 6,000.00 49.21 121.92 5] -0-060-035 1.000 121.92
9 6,000.00 49.21 121.92 51 -0-060-075 11.780 1436.18
9 6,000.00 49.21 121.92 51 -0-060-085 0.000 Exempt
9 6,000.00 49.21 121.92 5] -0-)60-095 3.860 470.60
9 6,000.00 49.21 121.92 51 -0-060-125 1.020 124.35
9 Exempt -- 0 51 -0-)60-:35 0.000 Exempt
9 Exempt -- 0 51. -0-060-145 0.000 Exempt
9 Exempt -- 0 51 -0-060-155 0.000 Exempt
9 6,000.00 49.21 121.92 A. -0-1160-17,. 1.860 226.76
9 6,000.00 49.21 121.92 ')1 -0-40-185 1.360 165.81
9 6,000.00 49.21 121.92 -•1: 60- 4S 4.980 607.14
9 6,000.00 49.21 121.92 1. 40-25, 5.380 655.91
9 6,000.00 49.21 121.92 1-1; 9-060-265 16.080 1960.42
9 6,000.00 49.21 121.92 `:1 1.60-27`: 0.889 108.38
9 6,000.00 59.21 121.92 '1 ••--,6+'-:'P= 1.005 122.53
'.'of: 3 Teta. 49,214 6,000.00
•
EXHIBIT "B" AD 84-2 03/31/94
Fund 23 Activity
-------- FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95
FY Y ---- Proposed
Description 1991/X92 X2/93 Budget Proj Actual Budget Notes:
BEGINNING BALANCE 264,973 ,1 '5 ,32 315,362 178,831
TRANSFERS IN 0 0 0
REVENUE 332,679 44 •,1t4 35'. ,006 354,413 463,175
AVAILABLE FUNDS 597,652 7' .349 .;:,368 669,775 642,006
EXPENSES
Personnel 18,250 721 19,346 20,000 22,900
0 & N 323,217 3: .031 359,111 345,589 385,780
Capital Inprovenents 0 4. 235 1511.445 125,355 222,135
Less TOTAL EXPENSES 341,467 38c 58 53. 902 490,944 630,815
YEAR END BALANCE 256,185 .31' 6. 138.466 178,831 11,191
LESS SET ASIDES:
Reserved for Buffer Inpr. (Zone 8) ;2( ;45! :40,3901 (34,890)
Future Capital Improvements •97.576) (97,576)
Unexpendid Budgeted Capital Projects (46,3651
Reserved Zone 2 Inpr. Assmnt (N/S T. k. Rd. Prkway) (6,2201
Surplus Zone 4 Maintenance Assessment (4,806)
YEAR END AVAILABLE FUNDS 2,4 :7 -�- 0 165
EXHIBIT "C": Zone Activity 03/31194
Page 1 1 1993/94 FY 1994/95
FY ; ---- Proposed
Description 1991/92 19'-19 Budget Proj Actual Budget FY 1994/95 Assessment
ZONE 1: Tract 2851: Bambi / Benwood / Flood Control Channe:
Maintenance
Prior Year Carry Over 0 27!7 2111 (1,819) 1,944
Plus Assessments 6,773 t, 185 9, 176 9,776 4,131 >»,»»)» 4,131
Budgeted Expenditures 6,773 46G 9,565 7,957 6,075
Less Actual Expenditures 5,498 279 9,565 6,013 6,075
Zone 1 Balance 1,275 il 119! 0 1,944 0
ZONE 2: Tract 2865: E/S Peach Hill Rd, N/0 T R Rd ** N/S T . 3d Parkway ** S/S T R Rd Slopes ** Christain Barrett & Spring
Maintenance
Prior Year Carry Over 0 (14, ,60, 9,01 4,609 (9,2071
Plus Assessments 32,419 50. 00 :7,x71 17,671 43,882 Maint Asot: 43,882
Budgeted Expenditures 32,419 36. 40 27,:42 22,280 34,675
Less Actual Expenditures 46,779 A A. :'7,.42 31,487 34,675
Zone 2 Maint. Balance (14,360) 4 , 9 �! (9,2071 0
Improvements * Prior Yr.
deficit » 9,265
Prior Year Carry Over 52,640 52, 40 52,640 52,640 (9,265)
Plus Assessments 0 ) 0 0 15,485 * S/S T. R. Rd
--- - -- Prkwy $10/lot
Budgeted Expenditures 52,640 52, ,iF -2,•4 52,640 6,220 for 4 Years
Less Actual Expenditures »»)» 6,220
S/S T. R. Rd Parkway
Peach Bill Slope 0 i1,u10 32,077 0 Impr Asmnt: 15,485
Sunnyslope Debris Basin 0 :1,6'0 29,828 0
• Total »> 59,367
Zone 2 Improv. Balance 52,640 52, 3 :9,265) 6,220
ZONE 3: Tract 3032: Buttercreek Entry ** Peppermill Parkaa-,
Maintenance
Prior Year Carry Over 0 41. 1,436 1,009
Plus Assessments 2,978 i,4.5 1,405 846 >>>>>»»:>> 846
Budgeted Expenditures 2,97S ..34•, 2,841 1,855
Less Actual Expenditures 2,052 .. 1,832 1,855
:one 3 Maint. Balance 926 1,G09 0
EXHIBIT "C": Zone Activity 03/31/94
Page 2 -'Y 1993/94 FY 1994/95
FY -- Proposed
Description 1991/92 19,2/93 Budget Proj Actual Budget FY 1994/95 Assessment
ZONE 4: Tract 3274: Williams Ranch Rd Barrier +t N/S iarkw,,:s =* S'S Parkway
Maintenance
Prior Year Carry Over 0 44`. ;- .6851 774 8,901
Plus Assessments 5,930 212 U•.118 12,118 0 »» »»> 0
Budgeted Expenditures 5,930 05- E .433 12,892 8,901
Less Actual Expenditures 3,485 88: F 433 3,991 4,095
Zone 4 Maint. Balance 2,445 '7: 3 8,901 4,806
ZONE 5: Tracts 3019 & 3025: N/S T R Rd Parkways ** S/S Sluts +• W/S Peach Hill Parkway
Maintenance
Prior Year Carry Over 0 (14 487) 2,783 1,670 (8,9931
Plus Assessments 24,355 40 73- 17,340 17,340 37,338 )>)»»,>» 37,338
Budgeted Expenditures 24,355 2t, 250 20,123 19,010 28,345
Less Actual Expenditures 38,842 24 58( 20.:23 28,003 28,345
Zone 5 Maint. Balance (14,487, °t i (8,993) 0
ZONE 6: Tract 3306: West end of Inglewood (Glenhaven)
Maintenance
Prior Year Carry Over 0 '5 88 722 593
Plus Assessments 1,452 �9 '.78 678 242 >>>>>>>»» 212
Budgeted Expenditures 1,452 1 '54 66 1,400 835
Less Actual Expenditures 777 +2 66 807 835
Zone 6 Maint. Balance o75 .:2 593 0
ZONE 7: N/S of L A Ave E/O Gabbert (West America)
Maintenance
Prior Year Carry Over 0 ,3 :,: '8 942 (3,206)
Plus Assessments 720 1 _7 ;, :37 3,087 10,581 .›».>,0›, » 10,581
Budgeted Expenditures 720 t s' :,;;5 4,029 7,3i5
Less Actual Expenditures 0 ti 1. •,5 7,235 7,375
one 7 •Maint. Balance 20 i' 3,2061 0
EXHIBIT "Cu: Zone Activity 03/31/94
Page 3 FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95
FY Fl -- Proposed
Description 1991/92 ,92.9 Budget Proj Actual Budget FY 1994/95 Assessment
ZONE 8: Home Acres Buffer Area
Maintenance
Prior Year Carry Over 0
Plus Assessments 1,200 Mnt. Ascot: 1,200
Budgeted Expenditures 1,200
Less Actual Expenditures 1,200
Zone 8 Maint. Balance 0
Improvements
Prior Year Carry Over l 20,445 20,445 34,890
Plus Assessments 0 ,445 20,445 20,445 19,245 impr Asmnt: 19,245
•
Budgeted Expenditures 0 . 445 41: 890 40,890 54,135 Total: 20,445
Less Actual Expenditures 0 0 6,000 54,135
Zone 8 Improv. Balance 0 2 14` it 340 34,890 0
ZONE 9: Condor Drive / L A Ave Parkway
Maintenance
Prior Year Carry Over 0
Plus Assessments 0 )»»)»>» 0
Budgeted Expenditures 0
Less Actual Expenditures
Zone 9 (Saint. Balance 0
Improvements
Prior Year Carry Over 0
Plus Assessments 6,000 >>>>>>>>>» 6,000
Budgeted Expenditures 6,000 Total: o,000
Less Actual Expenditures 6,000
Zone 9 Improv. Balance 0
TOTAL
FY 1994 9` ixoenses 144,590
1'44 c :o-e s:sessments ... 138,951)
EXHIBIT "D" 31-/far-94
AD84-2 Budget
`'Y 1193,94 FY 94/95
Department 143 Budget Summary FY 91/92 FY 92,9J -------• Proposed
..ctual Actual B,rdget Proj Actual Budget Remarks:
SALARIES & BENEFITS 18,248 15,7;8 :8 34, 20,000 !i 22,900 I1
MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS 1
623 Supplies 1,226 1,617 1,761 400 550
624 Postage 0 ) 2,30c 2,025 2,100 II
li
626 Printing 0 495 --- 0 0 iI
I
629 Special Supplies 0 ( 0 0 !i
II
637 Travel & Nilage 0 II C 0 I 0 ,!
638 Uniforms 3 0 'i 0 it
I
641 Professional Services 2,958 3,26" 5,500 3,480 I 5,625 -j
Ii
642 Contractual Services 97,939 100,86; 2�.,"!4 !I it
16,7x6 tl 133,126 r;
648 Insurance 0 0 0 ij 0 !
!i
651 Equip /faint 0 0 i 0 1I
I, II652 Utilities 215,284 213,931 :.2 ,I7? 221,480 I 240,465
654 Vehicle Naint 70 260 300 135 i 150 .1
I
655 Fuel 1,579 2,109 1710 189 i 264 l
II
656 Lubricants 0 0 ! • 0 II
!I
657 Small Tools 0 0 0 !I
II
658 paint & Repair 3,522 1,166 1,510 792 1,750 !I
661 Equip Rental 0 324 floG 342 I 1,750 ,I
il
N&O Total 315,578 324,031 3`9 1; 345,581 . 385,780 1'
903 Capital Projects * 0) 49,235 1:6 4'.5 125,355 t 1 222,135 *i!
TOTAL 336,126 389,994 5 2 `.1 490,944 I 630,815 !!
•
EXHIBIT "E" (Page 1)
AD84-2 Budget
Department 143 Budget Summary
Capital Improvements
Original Less Est. Balance
Acc. FY 93'94 Year End FY93/94 Allocated
No. Description # Budget Expenses Adjustments Funds
Prkwy: Millard/Los Angeles Ave :. 3 <<C
1 Prkwy: Shasta/Los Angeles Ave 404 17:00 L A AOC (17,5001 0
2 Prkwy: Poindexter @ Sierra 405 ;:2,i00 i 22,000 0
3 Prkwy: W/S Spring S/0 Pch Bill 403 C ' 0
4 Prkwy: E/S Spring S/0 Pch Hill 409 27,000 27,000 0 0
5 Prkwy: E/S Pcb Bill S/0 Mesa Verd 412 0 0 15,050 I 15,050
6 Prkwy: Pch Bill E/0 Mesa Verde 411 0 2,450 2,450 0
7 Prkwy: S/S L. A. E/O Tierra Rejad 408 "7,ii5 I 7,315
8 Prkwy Mod: T. R. S/0 L. A. Ave 402 0 ' 0
9 Prkwy: Princeton 416 .5,.H0 3,000 0 I 12,000
10 Median; Princeton ?? . ;5,'' O 3,000 12,000
11 Prkwy: S/S Cmps Prk E/0 Princeton ?? 3 + 0
12 Prkwy: M/S & S/S C. P. 14/0 Prncto ?? 3 J 0
Unallocated
13 Prkwy: N/S T. R. Pch Hill to Sprn 413 .3 . j 0
-- High Street Landscaping 414 ) 0
Sub-Total Citywide Assessments 103,81 57,450 0 46,365
Plus Zone Capital Expenses
Zone 2 [32,077 + 29,828 = 61,905] .. 61,905
Zone 8 [Design Only] 6,000
Total Capital Expenditure:; 125,355
EXHIBIT "E" (Page 2)
AD84-2 Budget
Department 143 Budget Summary
Total LESS
Capital Improvements Proposed 1s TOTAL
Project ?r: .r Balance Total Inter FY 93/94 ADDITIONAL
Acc. Cost rears' Project FY 94/95 Project Carry FY 1993/94
No. Description 1 Estimate Expense: Expenses Budget Transfer Over ASSESSMENT
I
Prkwy: Millard/Los Angeles Ave LA AOC 0 0 I 0
1 Prkwy: Shasta/Los Angeles Ave 404 LA AOC 0 0 f 0
2 Prkwy: Poindexter $ Sierra 405 22,000 ;2 00 0 I 0 0 0 I 0
3 Prkwy: W/S Spring S/D Pch fill 403 5,000 5,")0 0 0 0 0
4 Prkwy: E/S Spring S/0 Pch Hill 409 27,000 27,. JO 0 , 0 0 0 0
5 Prkwy: E/S Pch Bill S/0 Mesa Verd 412 35,000 0 55,010 35,000 ' 19,950 15,050 0
6 Prkvy: Pch Hill E/0 Mesa Verde 411 40,000 2, 10 +7,`ti0 0 f 0 0 ! 0
I '
7 Prkwy: S/S L. A. E/0 Tierra Rejad 408 20,000 -AAA 20,000 12,685 7,315 ; 0
8 Prkwy Mod: T. R. S/0 L. A. Ave 402 5,000 .0 ) 0 I 0 0
9 Prkwy: Pri:. _ton 416 40,000 .0 :',r10 37,000 25,000 12,000 j 0
10 Median: Princeton ?'. 44,000 !, 0 41A0 40,000 28,000 12,000 0
1I Prkwy: S/S Ceps Prk E/0 Princeton ?? 30,000 • 30,C{0 : 30,000 30,000 0 0
12 Prkwy: N/S & S/S C. P. W/0 Prncto ?? 18,000 18,0.0 0 0 0 j 0
0
13 Prkwy: N/S T. R. Pch Bill to Sprn 413 60,000 60,000 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0
Sub-Total Citywide Assessments 346,000 62.4 , 281,5 162,000 115,635 46,365 0
v v
v v
City-wide Capital Improvement Funds Available v
FY 1993/94 Carry Over 46,3x`, .(«‹<««««««,««««‹
Prior Year Reserve Allocated to Capital Projects 97,5"
Other Surplus 18,2.-
Toti1 62,W
Less Total Proposed City-wide Capital Improvements i 62,'001 «<
Year End Surplus :E
Citywide Capital Expenditurs 162,000
Zone Capital Expenses
Zone 8: Hone Acres Buffer 54,135
Zone 9: Virgina Colony Parkway 6,000
i;ta. 222,135
EXHIBIT 'F' 03/29/94
AD84-2
FY 1994/95 Cost Analysis
Street Lighting Cost Analysis
FY 1993/94 Summary
Street Traffic Signal
Date Lights Safety Light.ng Iotal Remarks
July 1993 14,723.00 0. 14.723.00
Aug 1993 14,790.00 0., 14.790.00
Sept 1993 14,858.00 }. 14.858.00
Oct 1993 14,854.00 0. 14 854.00
Nov 1993 14,894.00 0.• 14 894.00
Dec 1993 14,894.00 0.<< 14,89.4.00
89,013.00 99,)13.00 Six month cost
x2
178. 126.00 Projected Annual Cost
FY 1994/95 Estimate
Last Year's Cost 178,126.00
Contingency for rate adjustment ... 5,310.73
Estimated Anjual Cost for added lights ....... .
Total
Say.... 190,0{0.00
EXt+'AD;% G
PRELIMINARY
ENGINEER ' S REPORT
CITY OF MOORPARK
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
NO. AD-84 -2
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
Prepa: ed By :
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES, INC.
1470 S . Vail• y % ist,' Drive
Suit [ IC.
Diamond Pa CA '1765
Marc _ ' 9:
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Section 1 Authority fci Report 1
Section 2 Description 3f Improvements
to be Mainta lne3 1
Section 3 Assessment F111 4
Section 4 Method of A:: sessmert 4
Section 5 Estimate of :os: 6
Appendix 'A' Street Light :ng Formula - Table 1
Appendix "B" Landscape Formula Table 2
Appendix "C" Assessment timmary - Table 3
Appendix "D" Budget Estill ste
Appendix "E" Boundary Ma}
Appendix "F" Assessment )11
Appendix "G" Resoluticn$
Appendix "H" Rebate Proc ure
GC , '
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
CITY OF Mc)ORPARK
Engineer' : Repor
Parks Maintenance Assessment District
No. AD 84-2
Landscape and Ligh' inq Act of 1972
For Fiscal Ye.: r 1994- 1995
SECTION 1 AUTHORITY FOR REPOT
This report is prepared pursua:u o •:it_: Council action taken at
their regular meeting of January , 1994 to extend this District
for the fiscal year commencing iy ! , !994 and ending June 30,
1995 in compliance with the recut emenrs of Article 4, Chapter 1 ,
"Landscaping Act of 1972" , beini Pa: ' : of Division 15 of the
California Streets and Highways
The District will provide electr •sl energy for public lighting
facilities and for operation ,,;id ma _ntenance of public lighting
within the City. In addition •.he• District will provide for
installation and/or maintenancs c landscaping within the
public right-of - way.
SECTION 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MAINTAINED
This report covers the period . . , uiy , 1994 through June 30,
1995. An updated report is prof:r" . cac r year to reflect updated
annual costs and changes in pa
The City of Moorpark Ligh- ing :4a : ..•rune -r District. is proposed to
create a new zone of benefit fo• : • _ impr vement and maintenance of
the parkway located at the nor ) s ::carer of Los Angeles Avenue
and Virginia Colony i—ace, whi t esignated ac; Zone 9 .
The District is also proposed I , `.anye the method of assessment
for Zone of benefit the nor: h . .t- , E : r; Angeles Avenue Parkway
between Gabbert Road and Shasta c-:l,ra-, ftom per lot to per acre
basis . The commercta . area of i ne, it 8, the West Village
Buffer Area, is excluded from th•. .. _ ,u: i tart with the original intent.
The improvements to oe maintaan. : in tris District include all
City-owned and Southern Calif tc r -,h . on (S .C . E. ) -owned street
lights as well as all media: :- at st - oet trees within public
rights-of-'wary w: thin e b ;uto: i : : City.
DWIGHT FRENCH 6 ASSOCIATES
Lighting maintenance shall inclule, but is not limited to, energy
costs, removal, repair, replacement or relocation of light
standards, poles, bulbs, fixtures and all appurtenances . Servicing
of S.C.E. owned lights as definel in Section 22538 of the Streets
and Highways Code shall be furnished by the Southern California
Edison Company or its successor:;, or this servicing shall be as
authorized by the Public Utilities Commission, State of California.
Maintenance of City-owned lighti: g improvements shall be furnished
by the City.
Landscape maintenance shall include, but is not limited to,
watering, fertilizing, mowing, weed control, shrubbery, tree
removal and pruning, removal end replacement of dead growth,
maintenance of irrigation facil . - ies and other necessary work.
In addition, the cost to maintain improved areas within an easement
will be borne by owners within t ' arprc ect . These easement areas
are:
1 . Tract No. 2851
Maintenance costs associated with landscaping in the
Ventura County Flood Cintrol Easement and portions of the
interior tract entry a ear. . The obligation upon these 73
lots is pursuant tc a :ond:t. : on of development .
2 . Tract No. 2865
Cost for maintenance : f specific landscape areas within
the tract, including : andscaping at Christian Barrett &
Spring Roads; Tierra 1-ejada landscaping, and Peach Hill
Road landscaping on east side between Christian Barrett
and Tierra Rejada Roads, and the entry monument sign at
Christian Barret and ;pr_ng Road. The obligation upon
the lots within this I -ac: i= pursuant to a condition of
development .
3 . Tract No. 3032
Maintenance costs ass crated with landscaping an entry
monument at Buttercr, ek Road and Los Angeles Avenue.
This cost to be sprea' to thE. 265 lots within the tract .
4 . Tract No. 3274
Maintenance costs ass( ciated with landscape areas along
Williams Ranch Road parkway adjacent to Peach Hill drain
channel and Edison en' ries within PC-3 . This cost will
be borne by the 12') 1 r :, within the tract .
(1
•
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
5. Tract Nos . 3019, 3525
Maintenance costs asso. _atecl with landscaping the Tierra
Rejada Road slope and ,arkway areas and parkway on the
west side of Peach Hil Pcad between Williams Ranch and
Tierra Rejada Roads wit in Tract Nos . 3019 and 3525 . The
cost is to be spree•: • * t e 2 : 7 lots within the tracts .
6 . Tract 3306
Cost for landscape a. eu:. within Tract 3306 at the
westerly terminus of Ir•ila�wood Street . The cost is to be
spread to the 22 loi . Lt h i e • he tract .
7 . Los Angeles Avenue Parkway
Maintenance costs assoc _it ed with landscaping the parkway
on the north side of :, Anrieles Avenue between Gabbert
Road and Shasta Aveiii:e ..)/ “ 1 be borne by all industrial
lots northerly of I_.•m. ?-igeles Avenue, southerly of
Poindexter Avenue, e.3::t r ' o:f Gabbert Road, and westerly
of Shasta Avenue.
8 . West Village Buffer Area
Improvement and maintenance costs associated with the
buffer area within Tracts 4340, 4341, 4342, and multi-
family areas bounded : y Tierra Rejada to the east,
Mountain Trail to the soy the, Countryh i l l Road to the west,
Tract 4342 to the north ind Home Acres. The costs are to
be split 50-50 between he area within the City (Tracts
4340, 4341 , 4342 and multi-family areas) and the
unincorporated Home Pc!-- ; area
9 . Condor Drive Industria. Park
Improvement. and maiiitF t::c c•.3sts associated with the
parkway located at ! he :.t ! t:nwest corner of Los Angeles
Avenue and Virginia c ni-_ P1 ice will be borne by the
developed parcels 'r/ 7 - ' idiustrial Park.
Plans and specifications fo: re i.. r. gation, landscaping and
lighting of streets, parks a:.d .:,.tefcer .r;, and other authorized
improvements wi!-.hin she Cir_•. lit : . 1c in the Department of
Public Works . The lighting and specifications for
Edison-owned lights are on file wi :: the ..outhern California Edison
Company. Reference Lt hereby m.iclt - < :•,i i, plans and specifications
for the exact location and nam: ) i La landscape and lighting
improvements . Said plan, and f .: . ; . 3C ions by reference are
hereby made a pia r
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
SECTION 3 ASSESSMENT ROLL
All parcels of real property aff,!cted are listed on the "Assessment
Roll" , Exhibit "A, " which will be on file in City Hall with the
City Clerk, and is made a part hereof by reference. These parcels
are more particularly described .n maps prepared in accordance with
Section 327 of the Revenue and 'flaxation Code which are on file in
the office of the Ventura County Assessor in the County Government
Center Administration Building, 800 S . Victoria Avenue, Ventura,
California and w'•.ich are also made a part hereof by reference.
SECTION 4 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, in Section 22573 , states
that *The net amount to be as:;essed upon the lands within an
assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method
which fairly distributes the new amount among all assessable lots
or parcels in proportion to the •-2stLmated benefits to be received
by each such lot or parcel frpm he improvements . "
Lighting
The primary benefits of street . ightzng are for the convenience,
safety and protection of people Ind the security or protection of
property, property improvements aid goods . The intensity or degree
of illumination provided can hay. a bearing on both .
The single family home - Level 1 Las beer. selected as the base unit
for the spread of assessments . 31, iefinition, the single family
home - Level 1 is a single family some located on a street that has
existing street lights . A factor of 1 .0;) has been assigned to the
base unit, which is composed of he le f i t of rotors which correspond to
the following types of benef 1'
People Use _ People related )eneti- s 1 . 50
Security Benefit - Property .r•) :ection 0 . 25
Intensity - Degree of ill lm: .a': 0 . 25
1 . 0[)
6- 4
DWIGHT FRENCH & A SS(.X:I RTES
Parcels in other lana use categor es we2 then rated by comparison
with the basic unit . (See Table
People Use - People related eenefits
1 . Reduction in nigl: ace i ient.s and attendant human
misery .
2 . Reduced vulnerabi ;.t.;- tc criminal assault during
hours of darkness
3 . Promotion of tus ness a perations during evening
hours .
4 . Increased safety ( reads and highways .
Security Benefit - Property 'ro_ec' ion
1 . Reduction in vanda isn ar. i other criminal acts, and
damage to improverr •nt 3 _
2 . Reduction in burrs] :rieE .
Intensity
Intensity or degree of . 11umination provided on streets
varies with type of street, date of installation and the
use of the property adj cent t iereto.
Landscaping
The landscaping element of the sp: eau formula recognizes that all
properties within the City benef .t from the maintenance of the
landscaping within public right:: -of-way and easements . These
benefits include aesthetic enjoyment, creation of a pleasant
living and working environment, .n :.ncrease in general property
values, improved safety result_in, =porn a regular tree trimming
program and improved street sweep _ng capabilities resulting from
trimming trees which may ot.herwis', interface with street sweeping
operations . Because of the gerer,.. . tene'. it. received, the cost is
spread equally along each parte' ie the 7. ty . 'his :amount is shown
in the appendix.
Rebate
The City Counciapproved a reba .e procedure for disadvantaged
property owners . The procedure sl ill he followed as described in
Appendix `H. "
CZ•
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
SECTION 5 COST ESTIMATE
The City staff recommendation f -)r the District budget is shown in
Appendix "D" of this report .
The costs attributed to landscaping and the costs attributed to
lighting will be separately appointed, according to the formula,
and added together to constit•. te the total assessment for each
parcel.
Conclusion
In conclusion, it is our opinion that the assessments within
Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD-84-2 are
apportioned by a formula that fairly distributes the net cost in
accordance with the benefits that are received.
\rpt\050ad842.945
• (
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDICES
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "A"
CITY OF MOORPARK
Lighting Maintenance Assessment District
AD-84-2
Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972
Table 1
Street Lighting Formula
Use People Lighting Total Annual
Code Description Use Intensity Security Units Assessment
0 Residential Vacant 0 .00 ' . 00 0 .25 0 .25 $ 5.16
1 Single Family-
Level 1 0 . 50 ) . 25 0 .25 1 . 00 $ 20 . 64
2 Mobile Home 0 .00 1 . 00 0 . 00 0 .00 $ 0 . 00
3 Condo (Per Unit) 0 . 50 L25 0 .25 1 . 00 $ 20. 64
4 Residential Income
(2-4 Units) 0 .50 ; . 25 0 .25 1 . 00 $ 20 .64
(Per Unit)
5 Apartments (5+) 0 .50 : . C5 0 .20 0 .75 $ 15.48
Pet Unit
6 Single Family- 0 .50 : . C`. 0 . 20 0 .75 $ 15 .48
Level 2
9 Mobile Home & 0 . 50 : . C` 0 .20 0 .75 $ 15.48
Trailer Park
(Per Space)
10 Commercial Vacant 0 . 00 , . 00 0 .25 0 .25 $ 5 . 16
Land
11 Retail Stores, 2 .00 1 CO 1 .00 4 . 00 $ 80 .64
Single Story
(Per Parcel)
12 Store & Office 2 .00 CO 1 .00 4 . 00 $ 80. 64
Combination
15 Shopping Centers 4 .00 ! CO 1 . 50 6 . 50 $134 . 16
(Neighborhood)
16 Shopping Centers 4 . 00 CO 1 . 50 6. 50 $134 . 16
(Regional)
17 Office Building 1 . 00 CO 1 . 00 3 . 00 $ 61 . 92
(1 Story)
18 Office Building 2 .00 CO 1 . 00 4 . 00 $ 80 .64
(Multi-Story)
(Per Parcel)
19 Retail Stores 2 . 00 . CO 1 . 00 4 . 00 $ 80 . 64
(Multi-Story)
(Per Parcel )
G
DWIGHT FRENCH F& ASSOCIATES
Use People Lighting Total Annual
Code Description Use Intensity Security Units Assessment
21 Restaurants & 3 .00 1 . 00 1 . 00 5.00 $103 .20
Cocktail Lounges
24 Banks, Savings & 1 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 3 .00 $ 61 .92
Loans
25 Service Stations 2 .00 1 . 00 1 . 00 4 . 00 $ 80 .64
26 Auto Sales, Repair 2 .00 1 . 00 1 . 00 4 . 00 $ 80.64
Storage, Rental
30 Industrial land 0 .00 ) . 00 0 .25 0 .25 $ 5.16
Vacant
31 Light
Manufacturing 3 .00 1 . 00 1 . 00 5. 00 $103.20
32 warehousing 2 .00 1 . 00 1 .00 4 .00 $ 80.64
33 Industrial Condos, 2 . 00 1 . 50 1 . 50 5.00 - $103 .20
Co-Ops, PUD's
38 Mineral Processing 1 .00 1 . 00 1 . 00 3 .00 $ 61.92
44 Truck Crops 0 .50 0 . 25 0 .25 1 . 00 $ 20.64
46 Pasture (Permanent) 0 .50 3 . 25 0 .25 1 . 00 $ 20 .64
48 Poultry 0 . 50 25 0 .25 1 . 00 $ 20 . 64
49 Flowers, Seed
Products 0 . 50 25 0 . 25 1 . 00 $ 20 . 64
51 Orchards 0 . 50 C . 25 0 .25 1 . 00 $ 20.64
53 Field Crops, Dry 0 .50 " . 25 0 . 25 1 . 00 $ 20. 64
54 Pasture of Graze,
Dry 0 .50 3 . 25 0 . 25 1 . 00 $ 20.64
55 Feed Lots 0 .50 ) . 25 0 .25 1 . 00 $ 20 .64
57 Tree Farms 0 .50 3 . 25 0 .25 1 . 00 $ 20 .64
61 Theater 3 . 00 1 . 00 1 . 00 5 . 00 $103 .20
69 Parks C . 00 CO 0 . 0C 0 . 00 $ 0 .00
70 Institutional
Vacant =- 0 . 00 . . CO 0 . 25 0 .25 $ 5 .16
71 Churches, Convent
Rectory 0 .00 O . CO 0 .25 0 .25 $ 5 .16
72 Schools 0 .00 9 C 0 . 00 0 . 00 $ 0 . 00
73 Colleges 0 .00 7 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 $ 0 . 00
78 Public Buildings, 0 .00 : . CO 0 . 00 0 . 00 $ 0 .00
Museums, Firehouses,
Etc .
79 Flood Control 0 . 00 : . coi0 . 00 0 . 00 $ 0 . 00
80 Misc. Vacant Lots 0 . 00 'i . CO 0 .25 0.25 $ 5. 16
81 Utility Water
Company 0 . 00 1 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 $ 0 .00
83 Petroleum & Gas 1 .00 ) . 50 0 .50 2 . 00 $ 41 .28
86 Water Rights, Pumps 0 . 00 7 . 0.0 0 .00 0 . 00 $ 0 .00
88 Highways & Streets 0 . 00 ) . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 $ 0 .00
91 Utility-Edison 0 .00 , CO 0 . 00 0 . 00 $ 0 . 00
1
p .2
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
Use People Lighting Total Annual
Code Description Use intensity Security Units Assessment
92 Telephone 0 . 00 D . 00 0 .00 0 .00 $ 0 . 00
93 S.P.R.R. _ 0 .00 1 . 00 0 .00 0 . 00 $ 0 . 00
94 Undedicated
Community Areas
(Condos) 0 .00 J . 00 0 .00 0 . 00 $ 0 . 00
95 State Property 0 .00 3 .00 0 .00 0 .00 $ 0 . 00
96 County Property 0 .00 3 .00 0 . 00 0 . 00 $ 0 . 00
97 City Property 0 .00 3 .00 0 . 00 0 . 00 $ 0 .00
99 Exempt 0 .00 3 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00 $ 0 .00
G
-3
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "B"
CITY OF MOORPARK
Lighting Maintenance Asseeement District
No. AD-84-2
Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972
Landscape Formula
The landscaping element of the spread formula is calculated in
accordance with the method descr .bed as follows :
Total Annual Cost = S] ' .4'1 per parcel
Notes :
1 . In addition to the above landscape charge, 73 lots within
Tract No. 2851 are assessed an additional landscape cost
for a Ventura County Food Control Easement and portions
of the interior tract antry areas . The additional cost
per lot is $56 .59 . The obligation upon these lots is
pursuant to a condit.icL o` development .
2 . In addition to the drove landscape charge, 622 lots
within Tract 2865 are assessed an additional landscape
charge for the maintenance of parkways, Tierra Rejada
Road slope and street :cape areas, and the monument sign
within the tract . The additional cost per lot is $95.45 .
The obligation upon th- se let:; is pursuant to a condition
of development .
3 . In addition to the aoove landscape charge, 265 lots
within Tract No. 3C32 are assessed an additional
landscape charge for tte maintenance of an entry monument
at Buttercreek Road anC Los Angeles Avenue. The
additional cost pet h _ ;
4 . In addition to the t_:.ove landscape charge, 129 lots
within Tract No. 32 '4 are assessed an additional
landscape charge for tl e landscape for the maintenance of
parkway areas along 4illiams Ranch Road and Edison
entries within PC-3 . "he additional cost per lot is $0 .
The obligation upon rim ,;e lot _s pursuant to a condition
of development .
]. .1
DWIGHT FRENCH As )C:JA-(TS
5. In addition to the c:bo, _anctJeape charge, 217 lots
within Tract_ Nos. 301 and 3525 are assessed an
additional landscaping ct •trge for maintenance of Tierra
Rejada Road slope and p.:r kways and the parkway on the
west side of Peach Hil.1 oac between Williams Ranch and
Tierra Rejada Roads . Tie acrd. t iona 1 cost per lot is
$172 .07 . The obligation .:c a t ft so lei-=.:, i:. pursuant to a
condition of development
6. In addition to the above (encs :ape charge, 22 lots within
Tract No_ 3306 are a : tsseC an additional landscape
charge for the maint:en.:ace of landscape area at the
westerly terminus of Ips•. i ewnod Street . The additional
cost per lot is $11 .00 . Tn. ob .igat ion upon these lots
is pursuant to a Gond it i .A of d welopment .
7 . In addition to the ab. -.re landscape charge, 92 lot's
northerly of Los Angel(.:. river.uF.- southerly of Poindexter
• Avenue, between Gabbert Ind Shasta Avenues are assessed
an additional landscapa.ti i •':`iarge for maintenance of the
norths i de of Los Angeles fo.'e iiee Parkway. The additional
cost 1:-. S111 .46 per
8. In addition to the at••ve landscape charge, the 693
residential units withit: Tract Nos. 4340, 4341 and 4342
are assessed an addit 'nal ; L4 .75 per lot, for the
improvement and mainten;- co c f Alest Village Buffer Area.
The dome Acres, not I 1•:v.ted for any City-wide
lighting and landscape hai-geE are to be assessed for
$51 . 11 per lot for t h•: :.mfr moat. and maintenance of
West Village Buffer .'•r
9 . In addition to the above ,andsc.Te charge, 11 lots within
• the Industrial Park or. C:cndoz Drive are assessed an
additional landscape .n .:rge : )r the improvements and
maintenance of the p.t -:wa' ] x•atecl at the northwest
corner of Lou Angeles Pt -pie t:? 1'.c: Virgini _i Colony Place.
The addit ioal Cost •.(' . . , r acre
H-
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "C"
CITY OF MOORPARR
Lighting Maintenance Assessment District
AD-84-2
Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972
Table 3
Assessment Summary
Use Landscaie Lighting Total
Code Description Assessment Assessment Assessment
0 Residential $16.46 $ 5 . 16 $ 21 . 56
Vacant
1 Single Family-
Level 1 16 .40 20 . 64 37 .04
2 Mobile Home 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00
3 Condo 16.40 20 . 64 37 . 04
4 Residential
Income (2-4 Units 16.4C 20 . 64 37 . 04
5 Apartments (5+) 16 .4C 15 . 48 31 .88
6 Single Family-
Level 2 16 .4C 15 .48 31 . 88
9 Mobile Home and 16 . 40 15 . 48 31 . 88
Trailer park
10 Commercial Vacant 16 . 46 5 . 16 21 . 56
Land
11 Retail Stores, 16 .10 80 . 64 97 . 04
Single Story
12 Store & Office 16 . 10 80 . 64 97 . 04
Combination
15 Shopping Centers 16. 40 134 . 16 150 . 56
(Neighborhood)
16 Shopping Centers 16 . 10 134 .16 150 . 56
(Regional)
17 Office Building 16. 16 61 .92 78 . 32
(1-Story)
18 Office Building 16 . 10 80 . 64 97 . 04
(Multi-Story)
19 Retail Stores 16 . 40 80 . 64 97 . 04
(Multi-Story
21 Restaurants & 16 . 30 103 .20 119 . 60
Cocktail Lounges
24 Banks, Savings &
Loans 16 . 40 61 . 92 78 . 32
l
(' 1
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
Use Landscape Lighting Total
Code Description Assessment Assessment Assessment
30 Industrial Land 16 .40 5. 16 21 .56
Vacant
31 Light Manufacturing 16 .40 103 .20 119 . 60
32 Warehousing 16.40 80. 64 97 . 04
33 Industrial Condos,
Co-Ops, PUD's 16 .40 103 .20 119 . 60
38 Mineral Processing 16.40 61 . 92 78 .32
44 Truck Crops 16.40 20 .64 37 . 04
46 Pasture (Permanent) 16 .40 20 . 64 37 . 04
48 Poultry 16 .40 20 . 64 37 .04
49 Flowers, Seed 16 .40 20 . 64 37 . 04
Production
51 Orchards 16 .40 20 . 64 37 .04
53 Field Crops, Dry 16 .40 20 . 64 37 . 04
54 Pasture of Graze, 16 .40 20 .64 -37 . 04
Dry
55 Feed Lots 16.40 20.64 37 . 04
57 Tree Farms 16 .40 20 . 64 37 . 04
61 Theater 16 .40 103 .20 119 . 60
69 Parks 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00
70 Institutional 16 . 40 5 . 16 21 . 56
Vacant Land
71 Churches, Convent, 16 . 40 5 . 16 21 . 56
Rectory
72 Schools 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 .00
73 Colleges 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00
78 Public Buildings,
Museums, Firehouses,
Etc. 0 .00 0 .00 0 . 00
79 Flood Control 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00
80 Misc. Vacant Land 16 .40 5 . 16 21 . 56
81 Utility Water Co. 0 . 00 0 . 00 0 . 00
83 Petroleum & Gas 16.40 41 .28 57 . 68
86 Water Rights, Pumps 0 .0.0 0 . 00 0 . 00
88 Highways & Streets O .(O 0 . 00 0 .00
91 Utility - Edison 0 .00 0 .00 0 . 00
92 Telephone 0 . ( 0 0 .00 0 .00
93 S.P.R.R. 0 . 00 0 .00 0 . 00
94 Undedicated
Community Areas
(Condos) 0 . 00 0 .00 0 . 00
95 State Property 0 .00 0 .00 0 . 00
96 - County Property 0 . 00 0 .00 0 . 00
97 City Property 0 . 00 0 .00 0 . 00
99 Exempt 0 . 0C 0 .00 0 . 00
Actual assessment amounts may vary due to di, cre- .,n47eE. h. cween use codes and actual property uses.
-c.
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "D"
CITY OF MOORPARK
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
AD-R4-2
BUDGET ESTIMATE
FY 1994-95
ZONES OF BENEFIT
1 . Tract No. 2851
Interior Parkway & Flood C.: ntrol Channel 4, 131.00
2 . Tract No. 2865
Pacifica & Pardee 59,367 .00
3 . Tract No. 3032
Buttercreek & Peppermil:. 846 .00
4 . Tract No. 3274
Williams Ranch Road 0 .00
5. Tract No. 3019, 3025
warmington 37,338 .00
6. Tract No. 3306
Glenhaven (Inglewood) 242 . 00
7 . Los Angeles Avenue
North Side Parkway 10,581.00
8 . West Village Buffer Area 20,445.00
9 . Condor Parkway 6, 000.00
SUBTOTAL $13t, 950 .00
D-1
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
BUDGET ESTIMATE
FY 1994-95
City Wide Street Lighting $ 190, 000 . 00
City Wide Maintenance 296,225 .00
Zones of Benefit bi4, 590 . 00
Total Annual Expenses $ 636, 815 . 00
Less City Wide Capital Improvemer'. s -(162, 000 .00)
Less Funds from Other Sources ( 5. 640 .00)
Total Amount Funded by District (FY 1994-95) $ 46 , 175 .00
Less Zones of Benefit Assessment (135, 950 .00)
*Total City Wide Assessment. $ 324, 225.00
*Actual proportion to assessed:
Street Lighting ; A90, 000 .00
Maintenance __ .34L225 .00
Y24 , 2 .00
1 - '
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "E"
BOUNDARY MAPS
•
N— . tet--;. ` a i 1 , ;
A ' 70 1
_ :la . a rL
----
1 \J�J �- 1 - r,/1. D` ' b0.
V 3a.
wwl 1���;1 • in, , c
• rig51:14. 53.. ,i,, titilli : . 1-"-- , 1-
ILy 112111j, A: N
7 1 t
._ ..j 7071 C21/1'11- 7.1,b, i • ' lien. P. itt'''N > le
A.
, —1 '4,:, v... .....e.CYL -ta ;, ..,1 ...../4.......
it.
Al l• It .
ter' 11-1' *i Tanya_ -T. . 'i �. 1- e i�n�w,, -tVx+
•
51)
yr ,� •_ Q " _
:i.. , .,..,.. -Ave 111 . ...I. .. ...erv-- .... ..) ... .
., s• .....1 ) .... 1.5 ......400 e:•••.....',... 1
it„. ‘_....i• 0 , ,........,1,.... .
..... .... ,. . „...
•
• • .....- 1 � t ;� ---.' +.r.. / • _-i _ -- r! 1'1<•. "i}:.... ' -01__••Z
t.
O II
—0, r 1 , I ATM,. ,i, -ry•tet:;,.-:'
\ = ' .
• „r,... 4 . .;y
i ; i, ‘NHI iirli .' •
I ►"z. - , 4 q 1 rY I
^� , \; ‘), I 0
34 X - +•N I .Jki{`� .
e h •ma
• t 1 `
j.
. r i','h',�.ti + I1
iiP 11 I ; ilkir.!.,./.4 .
•
c...Ar ' s.,.-1.,./,,,,:: ,. tc;.;,,•;,,,,-,-.,...,:„:1,..,„yi.: , ..:.7- • i.:.- •-•
• N , gi .; oG I, .. s; ; •Y� • O 1 17' 1
► 1
.ZoN1C--.. 1 =
• Z ONC. a = T 2. g(o 5
_ N
. 245'-p : cutro a zoo
pl
- � .�
tIL _�� TR 3096-
ri-'Y., — .,..k.a AAP., : I-- in v. , ...,.._... iniir_ ,...i.wk,
- V r wan 7,50,, .;
-..) ..•11;(1 4:il: elicit," ,41,1,. . -2 ' ....i. ..., .. _
• _
MIMI 11/.11.11\
TR.3306y -- >
At X1.4!/L , - a
' 77iKf 16 2865-� 06 _
ii•
('� iii• _ .
' TRACT IIII12865-
l` 1 i•••• - ,1 \ el as , 'r
♦ �7 •
� ' .•III - :I;
TRACT �1 - \`t1 ,�
Qmooc IIii.1.1..
1' J ..• - �. .illi
Iy r, . ' i., '1 .). TR 2863-6 I C
f; V. 2863 46 f -� �, j '..,' .Ic T
� . 1 � t IN �8 I.I r TRACT
el
II•. \ �• 11111 \ . 2865--4
Nes.
1 ,• TRACT 0� 11• ' ` •
.
ST. ,H :..; , :i/ -- ' 1�•
aa. ♦ �1/4 �..;.•04 ------ 611'
`; TRACT CD
Rp
IN (i) ..11. ---r,f----JADJk e. ... ...I .- .
3! •
863-3 ! qr.
2845 .
•
8k ,
519 .
C1 • AD-84-2 (Page 3 of A)
--
v
-___/, ,_i Jz
1
t
U - ••
'_O RIS 4- = Z'• 32.7 4 r
________., .....--- 1 vo 0
W
......._,.
T ,._
ce
3 ►-
,A , ,, .
0.4
.i .• J •/ H. P
Iv % a
F. PQ
1.' 4/• X Q • p�
tt
-Dm.. 3 : - 3c 32. et % t }� ,,
• ,.
V P1 N: . 4 4
f v .bil kragrdi 14 .
4.1 l
,----v•.: Y4r1' o qea3,.�
l.IBeaeD1
4,1am-' —
•
HOWAY t
r
-Fri i. •
•
J
:.N , 0., LI
• . CO
•• • -
1•Me 4 •WI
•1'alsorqCFqwww!!1['✓AL >t fimx'r2Cakic. •rt r!•-
i
a.
3
I I6: AD-84-2 (Page 4 of t)
. .
.. N. ...
,._. ,a..„..., a ,
-- — , , tleVc. . 1- - .
.
- •
'I
. _ _
I '2±. -
I L_ /�•� •L
I i•
,Ot1t. .� ---T • 3.30�o - L - I
wTR zne i
.: • im
.'lit
: r,..: ...1 . ST TR.3306 .
It - 11171171
•2: 0 _ - - ---1 ! cojr„....„.1\
. ir.. .,....., , . r\
1 .„-N.,,,,;,,ip
't 3 01 SILVER - qt E IRA
oNE 5 7 3 5 LS
2865
EEPY wrND -2
i28I
._„TT: '
- 1
aa
T
•
,z V29 3 �..-- OS•
` Cl: ll
t 'j C 0 iii..
0
G. Al/-84-2 (1':1I;i, ') (11 S)
Y 1 1
H N 1
«. •
. 1
t ' j..
.3AV' ki37StD (.rEnna roo#.,r)
1
m.
I
T ...��..
.
`+
I l ..._..-- —A—H___.------ ...—.
0 . ... ..
4. rs13
•
lir 1
I
azo4� 7 t ®Ami - ® 1 'MN
tNDUS-T(SAL ?pax
PNI u.2
.......,.,.
ll
tilliPik2 1 6V lir V1 Ki7Mw
Tv -.- • • 2
t G
Y
t
x V)
® •J
./.4 IX
__ 4 .1
\ - - - l+ v7 - •- - .
.(T?) 17/`65\�>
G,: AD-84 (Page 6 of g)
..
'-`:i I eon• -'' ' -7-:'...eft.. ----...'---1 i--- .
..
'"'N... ' ...•'-r.:.........r.: .........zr: , . ---- ,-,--... ._.
. - . ......,,..... re...... .... -----.,--. •
ip ,,,,..1 ..... tinneftiel•ninni.
-.-.• s .i... ! -------
:'.:,..;.:: ::., . . --Z: . ..- '• 1 ,. 401mrallaz; LI:=1:7=crapro: -------1.-:72----!•-- --
I •••• .....0+ ...am sr 444
; p., wily --114....., ..,.. a -.......„,
-----,:3--_,
• • . . •,---.......,„.. / dr- vig, iminnitio.30A--, -If
...... aim. "...,...-.1
-...I..-• .
T
•-':•:1. .....>r :' '-.7..1. Plc •••• - i---
i I •'.N. .---
'.' ::.-%at...,,- . ......;...'".. "1.. ... 104 ,..• ...•
' l'*-:i.---•;-:%:-.•-• ••-w- '., 4" • ' ,•-",-,,-1
.'.4(1-irr.'. ."':';1•411 ,:.' 44',V....,....' 1.,,,,, ems—
I,-
,.„,____• i
11;11W11111.11 ' ..---;.r''' 0, olt 1".4..t..-,--- •
___,... ......• 40,4 •,..,,m ,--....,„-,,,tv-; ____ ..., -
irsoong,i
(..)
•••• ' 3
.\ ...,4..„-,a..?,. ,0054,. ke,- 1 ...,,,,,,,,vas foi.:Als• --..- :
\ ,-E.N. ..-4i, N„It tity.,.., ,,,,,,0 1 ,. • ktiouror,11-0_,w.s
\
_
. • i- - .•• ••i),\s-.05. ,d,1-1 , - Iv rim: .- -,briii ipi-ii,No •- -
, „... . . 4a* • -
_ .
1.-
`\ i ' "N•..?.: t:0-‘7•0$," NO ILVi's_._k > k rInt-c..1\ Ilb-- --
,., riv.N as. --416. . • . Zi:-....1-_-_
‘ t ,...:.':1-Tcs ..: .0.= SO-..,-,-\\,s• %,...%,:t1/4 .11 • V
- or- .r.,NT, -., , • ... t 46 `-'..-
-
N i..! 0,,, li, v.t.:',....-1A
% ,. ..;...z 4 Vto ."..:;&165.%4
-:---\ 'i.4. . 1641 11W, "\;t• 'Z. i C ; K• -.gm•
1111' :: •1... 'fr ii, .„....ec.". ...qt,cLt• k.N.•e: 4,,. 4;4'..?...,--.A•..:'..
7 c. -thi, W,4:4"..i:••:-Vt„1.:4-iN \ ••• •t .•-•%:.s.W.ta.--) .i F-;;
\ •.....*5-.lOWS
.
OfArii131k,\ 6%."-• ,.
; .•\-' .l!' "47.!*.-..'.ii;"'." .___,...
L --).- 0 ‘6..60%4 oh,-,,. • .. - .;,-...--w-,-.1,-...-' --I
-47. fi t: ••••3.1 0 p.::-.-r.opet.*\,7 ; ' rtitar.-.... - %- • . ,- .
SpAirl A..110 • .4'-'• VD.z.\ --I ‘ 4-.- ,.... .:-.•.• ti;;y„ i - •• . ,.,:,-.. - , : .
1-1 .,,'-1140t k,05.-91zir_., ,tv4.4-, •'4'11 if, • -‘44-C.,,3---.4 -___It-'---;:: '
. -..-„:_._ ,)tarAlisA 11461...„‘..444._,,%. •-.‘‘‘ ').,t,'..--4, a-.•• N'It-:-:----•_,.. . . X _
r"-"""-'t- EiEft1-4:.-V I '.'z‘rt•-&-,-,;/4 : *.•?‘rfia,,,___,.•
Als,/39, la . ,•••••• Ii21. " r Job -: ' I •..-:.-:'-=7-Mil•94. < .
/ ain..0,4,41,1ge ViVmactrai ,it
.\,. cat,fr -tot ill,'L"'t
I ' - 01 *a lass' . it. ?.
. • ' "vniat :vt to --.Ormy(-41
- -. voi- .,...• 'fir:"---.i.: .• 1: 3a. - t.,,----:-.,--f.... I CC
•• ..v-At. ..0. Isr- wzgaili ..: 1) •h: ••`--‘v.'..'N5'...:...z Il—
l.:
• X . .1:4..."'--i-A."-,...m., 1))11".•0;,,r,_-.144, -,r.i.b.k.:-';.?:14" 4.77:',...m.--14:1",1*.v...'••'0):,t; ;.c-_--,,--- I <
LU , ., ..,,,,kit..t, ....„,_.,,, ,, A14..1 ,.„ 11••pl.,: ..nr, _... _ .
•. ,.. kff,t(w.:444.1.--ingt N::,...47,:ar-- , -: ..\. ,.:-.,.,. .
cc • ii, ,,,A.,,,,,,,.„....1.,,,,,,, ,i. m. _ . ,,..,.. ...,„. i L,
. . ,witsr,-,....„..4,,,AT ,,,---•,,,,,,,id,wicz:ID:r-.4.4-1,'::- --1,---r•-... LI j
-‹ Irlavvr ,v7... 0..4.0 . .., . .
- - .
. , . 7 8n
, 4., ..„.„747-„,„0,4 .. .,,.. 1
Li Lll
CO
ftliii,40. . A 411 alkILIO.t 1 11 r% 1 1
1 . • eftft,..."
I LI_
4. 1 .: 1 .
. - I 0
volorcelmia. -....Atli •
- i
.›.-
III
...,,,.... ...e 111111 1
II
:- ----- -(--i': ""WAllt
• LLJ , •
loi.. oil
A•pmm ______w.... mg i 1"-
I E r-----; ' • <
r------- LU
, ---_______. s• >--- cr
</i•ii.....k.... ci... . , „
2 . '1---
...... _rvis_ i ..•
.
I CC .._. ... .
iti M. _ __,< ••
i ''' AMMINIIIIM r. 1.11111111..1 b0
, • ,'—: ..
MIMIIMIMIIM—
. n
. .
. /,•...,s.
\.. ' r , 4*A61.111111 I 4.' JC.)4 I .
/i 111 . •.. /4)
. 77-----1----------- . VII!
„ fit /7,1 / --,1'... ----•-? ' 1 ' —
,, ] 1
,•L' „.' - ,_ ;.. ' /-
,-,...:::& , / i -------. • -
N
- A - -,-,
-842 2
-- - - -
\ i „
// .s, L , ' \,,.7•14r.,_ _ , .
/ I (Page 7 of II,r)
, \ 1
. ,
, • -. _ , 1 -• ftwaiii-4---
q- • ,
1 M
; r i
a
.
• GYN !
N
1 \
11
S
I . .
• —u112-" ti
•
.•f. 1' `tet • rt
I • . .
1g •• '%.. ,..• A 4A gi , .-..
® ‘ !. .*;:-'h• ..'....„ / Ai
1 `^a w ;; "`�+FFF� Dol/4�'•., • ,0, 1-
� . a
r 4
1 i. •: ari 4 lJo.
1 E.'1% "' ' Ti 0 alk 1i A. 1.014'
4
'titt r ! ~�
o ` Y144 z
4
u <:� o
,. yr.
: •
..•. •• •.• •
•,-* v.....0•",' . I••• '-.w' sr 4.01A.4.4% 1.44•4737.
" II" ;,o
c
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "F"
Appendix "F" , the Assessment Rol, shows. the assessment upon each
lot -or parcel (approximately 8387 parcels) within this District and
is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and County Assessor.
The Ventura County Assessor's office no longer lists public utility
easements on the Assessor's Ro; . .
C1
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "G"
RESOLUTIONS
6
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX "H"
REBATE PROCEDURE
6
X4.11 .4- 11
JOINT NOTICE F A j,'i_Rf,l( MEETING AND A PUBLIC HEARING
PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Moorpark. California,on April 6, 1994, adopted
Resolution No. 94- fixing the date and time of a public meeting to be held on the 16th day of May, 1994,at the hour of 7:00
p.m. in the Councirthambers of the Moorpark City Hall, located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark. The purpose of said
public meeting is to allow the public an opTortunity to meet with City staff to question and discuss the proposed annual
assessments for the "MOORPARK LiGHTIN( AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD•
84-2' for the fiscal year commencing on Jul'. I, 1994 and ending tin June 30, 1995,which would provide for the furnishing of
power for and the usual maintenance and servicing of street lights and the landscape maintenance of public rights-of•way within
the said City, to question and discuss the vnp,is.d incrr.ises in said assessments over those levied for said District in FY
1993/94.
PUBLIC NOTICE IS ALSO HEREBY Cil\'l:N that said Resolution No 94- also fixed the date and time of a public hearing
of the Moorpark City Council to be held on the Ist day of lune, 1994, at thee- our of 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the
Moorpark City Hall. located at 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark. The purpose of said public hearing is to consider making
certain changes in, and to order the annual assessments for the 'MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPE
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO AD•84-2' for the fiscal year commencing on July 1, 1994 and ending on
June 30, 1995, which would provide for the furnishing of power for and the usual maintenance and servicing of street light,and
the landscape maintenance of public rights-o,was.within the stud City.
A copy of Resolution No. 94- which is sA tinned as follows: 'A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF h{OORPARK, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR. AND DECLARING ITS INTENTION
TO MAKE CERTAIN CHANGES AND Ti) ORDER THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE 'MOORPARK LIGHTING
AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCI: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD-84-2' FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
COMMENCING JULY 1, 1994 AND ENDING iUNE 10. 1995 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING
ACT OF 1972, AND FiXiNG THE TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS AND A PUBLIC
HEARING TO RECEIVE OBJECTIONS 'tIERETO.- t• on file with the City Clerk and open to inspection. A summary of
said Resolution is summarized as follow,.•
1. That the Engineer's Report prepared r t Assessment I/istnct No. AD84-2 for FY 1994/95 is approved.
2. That said Engineer's Report may be • -the. tu,difie,l sir changed,pursuant to appli.:able State law.
3. That the amount of the assessments I. Assessment I ustrict No. AD84-2 for FY 1094195 are proposed to increase Prom the
amount of the assessments levied Dor—.id drvnct in J Y 109.3/94
4. That it is the intention of the City Courted a'•to make certain changes to Assessment District No. AD 84.2, h1 to order the
extension of the annual assessment Dor said district far FY 1994/95;and, c) to levy and collect assessments for certain
improvements described herein Said district consists of a single city-wide zine to provide electric current or energy for
public lighting within the City, to provide for Installation or maintenance of landscaping and the construction or
maintenance of curb, gutter,or sidewalk structures and facilities, to install or construct fatalities,which are appurtenant to
any of the foregoing, for the maintenance or servicing or both of any of the forgoing and to provide incidental expenses in
connecuon therewith. Said distrii t Also includes assessments forboth,
he improvement and maintenance of the above descnhei
landscaping and related improvement, in a number•.' tames of benefit.
5. That said lighting and landscaping iamter.ance a••,essnient district includes the lightin• and landscaping sites with .ill
improvements located therein. lrs,•rii•-•d ho ipd inc did within Assessment District No. AD 84-2.
6. That the foregoing described ai it ,, atc.i u thin Assessment /district No. AD R4-2, the boundary et which is
described on a map on file in 1iv •'I..k
7. 1tiai .+aid proposed maintenanse epi is•omni ail benefit to, and cspense Dir which are chargeable upon. the disut,I
8. That a full and detailed deunpt,oi ,t the improsemenis, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the
proposed assessments upon assessahli• parcels within said District,is set forth in a copy of the afore mentioned Engineer's
Report on file with the City Ceti an .pon to mare titin.
9. Thai the existing assessments, Ihr pt.I•ios•,d rissr.sm•:nts and the proposed increases to the assessment amounts are set forth
in Exhibit'A'attached hereto and -ii,•Ic •I art her••d
10. That a public meeting shall he eons sed nit Mass 16. 1994. at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Moorpark City
Hall to allow
the public an oppoitun Is•to meet with City staff to question and discuss the proposed annual assessments for
Assessment District No. ADA t.2 f•. f!' I'o04,o5. and the proposed increases to said assessments over those levied in FY
1993/94.
11. That a public hearing of the Misirp...ik 4 it. C'oursii shall be held on June 1, 1994,at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers
at the Moorpark City Hall to cionsi.lcr milting or:rain changes in. and to ;order the annual assessments for Assessment
District No. AD84-2 for FY 19e.to>•
12. That this Joint Notice of Public Mn•eine and Public Hearing is given, and that any persons having any objections to the
work or extent of the assessment di:.tnct may appear and show cause why said work should not be done or carried out or
why said district should not he extended for the fiscal year commencingJuly I 1994 and ending June 30. 1995. Protests
must be in writing, and must be file l by the property owner with the Cty Clerk prior to the conclusion of the hearing and
such protest shall state all grounds •t the objection and shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property. A
majority protest will cause the asses•iieni t icrease•,i be abandoned.
13. That all the work proposed shall h• Jane n ,iccoi,lanee with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972. being Part 2 of
Division 15 of the Streets ant:Ifighi•ays C ale of•I-e Mate of California.
14. That the City Clerk shall cause rims,::or said puha,meeting and public hearing to be given by causing this summary of the
Resolution of Intention to be pubic•bed and mailed in the manner required by Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and
Highways Code and Section 549154 • •f•hi G.vrrrment Code of the State of California.
•
15 That the•'icy Clerk shall Celt a i•.hi • hu.'..solution.
ATTEST
q CI We —--- 'au \V '�iw•rastm 7r.,Mayor--
THIS NOTICE iS GIVEN pursuant to t:u pros. ins o: the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972•Section 22500 et. :ee. of the
Streets and Highway Code of the State. ' r al lc iota ori' is dated this 20th day of May,City Clerk ---
Exhibit'A: El( A (2)
AD 84-2 Summary of Aaseysments
N. City Wide Assessment'
Proposed
Use FY 1993/94 FY 1994/95 Proposed
Code Description Assmnt(SI assmnt j$1 lnc,ease
0 Residential .Vacant 16.84 21.56 4.72
1 Single Family-Level l 3).00 37.03 4.04
Mobil Home 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 Condo 33.00 37.03 4.04
4 Residential Income 2-4 ung•. 33.00 37.03 4.04
5 Apartments(5+) 27.61 31.88 4.27
6 Single Family-Level 2 27.61 31.88 4.27
9 Mobil Home&Trailer Pali, 27.61 31.88 4.27
10 Commercial Vacant 16.84 21.56 4.72
I I Retail Store, single story 07.64 98.94 1.31
12 Store&Office Combination 97.64 98.94 1.31
15 Shopping Centers(Neighhorhiin 151.50 150.53 (0.97)
16 Shopping Centers(Regional} 151.50 150.53 (0.97)
17 Office Building(one story, 76.0'. 78.31 2.22
18 Office Building(multi-star)) 97.64 98.94 1.31
19 Retail Stores(multi-story) 97.64 98.94 1.31
21 Restaurants&cocktail loon ci's 119.1!' 119.58 0.40
24 Banks.Savings&Loans 76.09 78.31 2.22
25 Service Stations 97.64 98.94 1.31
26 Auto sales, repair, Sloragr ' 0 i• 97.64 98.94 1.31
30 IndK•.vial Land Vacant 16.84 21.56 4.72
31 Light Manufactunng 119.14 119.58 0.40
32 Warehousing 97.63 98.94 1.31
.13 Industrial Condos. Coop• i' '1 119,14 119.58 0.40
18 Mineral Processing 76.09 78.31 2.22
44 Truck Crops 33.00 37.03 4.04
46 Pasture(permanent) • 33.00 37.03 4.04
48 Poultry 33,0() 37.03 4,04
19 Flowers, seed production 33.00 37.03 4.04
S I Orchards 33.011 37.03 4.1-1
53 Field crops, dry 33.00 37.03 4.G4
54 Pastures of graze. dry 33.00 37.03 4.04
55 Feed lots 33.00 37.03 4.04
37 Tree farms 33.00 37.03 4.04
61 Theater 119.18 119.58 0.40
70 Institutional vacant land 16.84 21.56 4 72
71 Churches, convent&rector, 16.44 21.56 4.72
7R Public Bldgs. Fire Houses. M' "ono,.etc 0.!10 0.00 0.00
80 Mise, Vacant land 16.14 21.56 4.72
81 Utility Water Company 0.;83 0.00 0.00
83 Petroleum&gas 54.4 57.77
3.133
91 Utility Edison
9' Telephone 0. K) 0.00 0.00
'i, SPRR 0.10 0.00 0.00
94 Undedicated Communttt (',n, [sive npmeer 0.:30 0.00 0.00
.l'• Exempt 1).00 0.00 0.00
R. Zone of BeneTl: In adduinr c..the Citywide Assessments listed shine by land use categories. the properties within
each of the nes listed het•'•.• will he assessed a per kit Zone assessment for the improvement and maintenance of
certain improvements d,•term,' •J h•he or benefit to the properties within those Zones.
Proposed
FY 1993/94 FY 094/95 Proposed
Zone Descriptiop Assnint IS) Asst Increase
-T- Tract 2851:Parkways(Cj' (tau! !. 133.0.. mn177.33)
Kenwood,Pecan and VCFC1' 'harm•I
2 Tract 2865: Parkways East s, • 28.31 95.45 67.04
Patch Hill,N. Side Tierra
Rejada:South slopes& ('hr, in
Barrett and Spring
3 Tract 3032: Buttercrees 1.nit. inr. 5.10 3.20 (2.10)
Peppermill parkway
4 Tract 3274: Parkways, m'rd, ,rid 93 94 0.00 193.94)
south side of Williams Rano lid
5 Tracts 3019&3525: ParI.w" mir'h 79 91 172.06 92.15
side of Tierra Rejada Road, est',ice
of Peach Hill Rd: south'id. •.irl''v:••
& slope
6 Tract 3306(Glenhavrn m: (a' Ali, (r 30 82 11.00 (19.82)
west end of Inglewood A"r
7 industrial Dark aortheasr .ants t 33.55 • 20.06 ••
i L.A. Ave.: Parkway iicrin le it to
L.A. Ave east of Sabre'• 557.39
8 West village Buffer:
• Cri ., n,PP 20.53 14.75 (5.78)
• Hoe„ s,„ 51.11 t51.11 0.00
1 C'•ndor Drive ,It,44-J4-1..•4;11 •.
t6, to
.31.
ante: " .!et +e+ assessment 1c16,•4y
•• rill ro,r, amo'Ifr to P• tar tht• zona has Increased from 13,087 so 1,10,581. the
anaessme-r for FY 1994(95 will be I per acre assessment of 8111.46. Depending on the SID of
'r• ,ot the assessment arrant ranges from• low of 820.06 to a high of 8557.39.
elle
"I a sore Ma a per acre ,wens of 869.06. Depending en the size of the lot, the •ssasamant
e,vit•t 'Inset •rem a tie of 854.19 to a roan of 8960.21.
• ' ^a' ',it ,• a nee one, the entire amount a' the assessment is an increase over last year.
f.
r0,rotv0E5-:5.not
RESOLUTION NO. 94- _ --
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, MAKING CERTAIN
CHANGES TO THE "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. AD-84-2"
AND CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT FOR SAID
DISTRICT THE FISCAL YEAi' COMMENCING JULY 1 ,
1994 AND ENDING JUNE 30 , 19'15 .
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Moorpark, by
Resolution No. 94-994 , adopted January 5, 1994, declared its
intention to make certain changes to the "MOORPARK LIGHTING
AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. AD-84-2", and to
order the extension of the annual assessments for said
district for the fiscal year commencing July 1 , 1994 and
ending June 30, 1995; and,
WHEREAS, said "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. AD-84-2" consists of a single city-wide zone to
provide electric current or energy for public lighting within
the City, to provide for installation or maintenance of
landscaping and the construction or maintenance of curb,
gutter, or sidewalk structures and facilities, to install or
construct facilities which are appurtenant to any of the
foregoing, for the maintenant a or servicing or both, of any of
the foregoing and to provide ncide_n.tal expenses in connection
therewith; and,
WHEREAS, said "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD-84-2" also consists of a number of
specific zones in order to provide for the assessment of the
properties within said zones for the cost of maintaining
certain specified improvements whi(rh benefit said properties;
and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of a Joint Powers Agreement
(JPA) between the City of Moorpark and the County of Ventura,
the City Council of the City of Moorpark, by Resolution No. 92
- 860 adopted on June 29 , 19'02 , annexed certain unincorporated
area just west of the City known as Home Acres, to the
"MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. AD-84-2" in order to implement those provisions
of the JPA pertaining to the construction and maintenance of
a buffer area between said unincorporated area and the West
Ranch area of PC-3 (Tracts 4: 40 . • 341 and 4342) ; and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with the provisions of the aforesaid
JPA, it has been determined that said buffer area provides
benefit to both the afore� aia Home Acres area and the West
Ranch area of PC-3 , and <i Zone of Benefit encompassing said
areas was established to a . low for the levy of assessments on
the properties within said Zone of Benefit for the purpose of
developing and maintainino s.s .c Luffer area; and,
SA. 1 (2)
Resolution No. 94-
Page 2
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Moorpark, by
Resolution No. 94-1026 , adopted April 6, 1994, approved the
Engineer's Report pertaining - o such matters; and,
WHEREAS, said Resolution No. 94-1026 also set 7:00 p.m. , May
16, 1994, as the time and date of a public meeting to allow
the public an opportunity to discuss the proposed increased
assessment with City staff ;
WHEREAS, said public meeting was convened on May 16, 1994,
at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers for the purpose of
allowing the public an opportunity to discuss with City staff
the proposed increased asses.ments ; and,
WHEREAS, said Resolution No. 94- L026 also set 7:00 p.m. ,
June 1 , 1994, as the time .nd date of a public hearing to
consider such matters; and,
WHEREAS, on June 1 , 1994 , the City Council held a public
hearing to determine whether- said changes to said district
should be made, and whether she annual assessments should be
ordered and confirmed for tte fiscal year commencing July 1,
1994 and ending June 30 , 19' .=) ; and
WHEREAS, the City Counc 1 finds that written protests
against the proposed work or assessment have not been made by
owners representing more th, i _D.ie-half of the area of land to
be assessed: and,
WHEREAS, the City Council , having duly received, considered
evidence, oral and documentary, concerning the jurisdictional
facts in this proceeding anc concerning the necessity for the
contemplated work and benefits to be derived therefrom, and
the City Council having now acquired jurisdiction to order the
proposed assessments for tie fiscal year commencing July 1 ,
1994 and ending June 30 , 1 ,-. )5 .
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE. A. FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Engineer': Report for "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. AD-84-2" , filed with the
City Clerk on April 1, 199-. , as amended or revised by action
of the City Council, is hereby approved and adopted, and the
improvements, changes to and extension of the annual
assessments in the Assessr.ent District, in accordance with
said report, as revised, cin i in accordance with Resolution No.
94-1026 approving said Fnq;: -leer' c. 2eport, is hereby levied for
the Fiscal Year 1904/)! .