HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1994 0720 CC REG ITEM 08FT
AGENDA k2 E.'PORT
C = `I'Y OF' MOOR PARK 740-. Z!
TO: The Honorable City Courr ,l
FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert Di r-ctor of Public Works
DATE: July 8, 1994 (Council M(- et i nq /-20-94)
SUBJECT: Consider Authorization t.o Advertise for the Receipt of
Bids for a Project to Make Minor Repairs and Apply a Type
II Slurry Seal to Tierr, Rejada Road
DISCUSSION
A. Background
On March 1.6, 1994, the City Cou +,ci) gave: conceptual approval of
a project to make necessary rept,drs to, and then apply a Type II
Slurry Seal to Tierra Rejada P,)ad from a point west of Spring
Road, westerly and northerly to Los Angeles Avenue. Said
approval was conditioned upo7 participation by Urban West
Communities (UWC), whereby UW,, would reimburse the City for
those repairs and improvements constructed within PC -3.
California Community Builders (('('B), on behalf of UWC, has
agreed to assume the respons_ih its° f=-.r these improvements.
B. Project Descri tion
The entire length of Tierra Re),ida Road from Spring Road to Los
Angeles Avenue is in need 7f resurfacing. It is the
recommendation of the City f,ngineer that the method of
resurfacing include 1) the r..ymoN,ral and replacement of the
asphalt and base material in &,. :stain areas; 2) the filling of
minor voids in the pavement wittz asphalt: and /or crack filler as
required; and, 3) the applica* )n .,f i Type II slurry seal.
Upon conferring with CCB,
it wa:. ,
agreed that
the developer would
undertake the removal and
repla(
ement of the
asphalt pavement on
Tierra Rejada Road with
thei.3
- ontr.actor.
The scope of that
work would be determined b,
the City,
and the actual
construction would be inspecte(ji
by the City.
Engineering costs
cost for determining the
scope
)f thi.s. work
and for inspecting
same, would be charged to
inspE :,(
t. i r fo, :. s previously paid by UWC
for these improvements.
tr._slry2
Tierra Rejada Road Slurry Seal
July 1994
Page 2
It was further agreed that the City would undertake the crack
filling and the application of the Type II slurry seal on Tierra
Rejada Road as a part of its ,:,cntract. CCB will reimburse the
City for these construction czosts, plus a pro -rata share of
design, construction administ:ra' fort an(:- :inspection costs related
to that construction.
The present Scope of Work for 'his project is shown on the map
attached as Exhibit 1. The pro-lect includes that portion of
Tierra Rejada Road north of t:.h., Arroyo Simi bridge. Pavement
deflection testing is being performed )rr this portion of Tierra
Rejada Road for the purpose f determining if this roadway
segment is in need of an asphalt overlay at this time. That
analysis is expected to be compketed within the next one or two
weeks. If the results of that analysis indicates that this
portion of street is in need c,H an asphalt overlay, this road
segment will be omitted from thf ,cope of Work for this project
and added to an asphalt over! r 1 rojvct. planned for the near
future.
In addition, the deflection testing being performed also
includes that portion of Los Angeles Avenue east of Collins
Drive. If that analysis jidicates that the appropriate
resurfacing method for this street is removal and replacement of
selected areas, crack filling wnd the application of a Type II
slurry seal, it is the recommendation of staff that this road
segment be added tc, the Scope " Work, for this, project..
C. Fiscal Impact
1. Project Cost Estimate: A pielim_inary cost estimate for the
streets identified on Exh b - 1, d- as follows:
Design . . .
Construction
Construction
Contingency
Sub -Total
Less Reimb.
Net Cost to
Admin / 7 n,-3
from CCB
city . .
Amount ($)
2,500
140,000
15,000
14,500
172,000
( 68, 0001
104,000
2. Budget: The approved FY.l`a 4/95 Budget shows $100,000 for
this project funded by the as Tax Fund. It is recommended
that any Budget adjustment x)e dPfcerred until. the award of
contract.
tr, slry2
Tierra Rejada Road Slurry Seal
July 1994
Page 3
D. Plans and Specifications
A copy of the plans and specifi ata.ons for the project has been
made available for review it `: - City Council office.
RECOMMENDED ACTION (ROLL
CALL VOTE)
Staff recommends that
the
City Cc, -- :(: take the fol Lowing actions:
1) Approve the pans
and
specifi.: ton,
2) Authorize staff to
adjust the -3 .)pe of
work as described in this
report subsequent
to the comp ' A cr-i of
pavement analysis;
3) Authorize staff
to
adverri.-
receipt of bids upon
determining the final
Scope ' :V(r E,
tr_slr)7
Qom-•- ..�■�t�� �o .I♦
.ter.' r.�r NCYr r w7w r