HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1994 0803 CC REG ITEM 08M- V/28/94 16:10
'27/94 Zl*H2:34
27-84
ow* ra" idol,
ikD 13:33
$213 236 2700
LEAGUE OF CA CITIES
BW &S LA
1 213 z36z-ree Ck
FAX HO. 81044
L.oagUa of California Cities
ITEM .
P98e —1_ of _2
FAC81MIf,E ^'''A�`'�c, c,, ,-
c;, .
TRANSMIZTAL `� c ncrl i.;,:
Of "' ��
y
City AttomY ACTION:
FROM; Ls$* Ad Xmq CommlttCC (VAX 916/444-8671)
DATE: yobs 27, 1994 By
Rm: Request for City Joinder In gel Sriet;
No. 4 ay. D017139
i4 axis[ of list requested supplemental bricting on 133065 in an
wbi4 if r "DZYW NOult dtit% wukl 1wvr very lroublIng implications f 'as. Accef�
the Ip1 Advocaq Cow is �g epics to j0G1 a friead•ofT the -oou t brie[ being mitten
by Cbdati Roil+, City Attornay of Malibd, OR the some of the issues ldentirled by the court or
appeal.
The court requested brie$ng on these issues In mid -July and gave an August ! deadlin w C
11 whY the taague is taking the lewraordim-ry step Of far u. e, ing thk information to yo
Those Issues relato to causation and damages in inverso Condemnation actions, They include:
What &b0* &W Of ransat 011 and damages is required to show a taking by an invalid
regulation? DOW a tftboaieai invalidity of a growth Control measure aoato Idalil &e
1E fie to A developer or is a showing of damages directly attributablo to the measure
n6668U9Y? Is a temporary fluotudwon in property value eompensable?
Can a des et, wblch is a wholesaler of 1and, cWm 1akigs dau�ages when it did not
for ding pemcuts? Can such a wholesales be dirocay affeet6d by a regulation
and be the victim of a taking as the result of a regulation, when the developer haae not
applied for permits? 1: It wholesaler of land exempt from the 6XhaMUM of
administradve remedies doctrine and ripeness rcyuireme= bemuse a wholesaler
world AMjr be in the position of applying for building permits?
• as the two - ,pronged test in c 1 AV III,, 447 U.S. Z33. 260.61 (1979),
by a �ee-PUl definition of rekulatury takil>$s in Iuc�s v. South
i. �ivaa i���ai M.eLl 505 U.S. 122 8. Ct, 2886, 120 % gd. 2d 748, 812-13
(1942)? The court Chet to the discussion in
Stat___r=_V tot► K arn*.,� t" tmT -Hilaa 23 Cal. App, 4th 14590 1474 -78 (1994).
f r+�t 1400 K STREET- SA Fi 10. G11 WWI 4 +o iUrtr Cn, a°Nfe c
.. - - _ e•v m,M ..� may, MOWAN � ow woo
. _ _ 1r+q eoa•+ms
JU- 28 194 16:04
213 236 2700 PAGE.002
A)7/28/94 16:09
07/27/94 21:83:28
JUL -27 -94 WED M34
FAX
Page 2
July 27, 19%
V213 236 2700
LEAH OF CA CITIES
BW &S LA
1 213 2362788 Mw v I Ions
FAX N0. 8104448071
Q001
Paps M2
P. 02
'I he qu"Uo S aXe in file ooniat Of al Case iavotvlag a au,aut pouea;turC ado�d
by dtY vvtwa. DOvtbpers dainled the saWWI6 i Mcb with tha public teatid" shment of
tho say's pnoral plop cad state
% law. Soa CRL Gort Code if 6500& (pdrobibitin
lay ,I meet � log► fAwMe hmm ftl 65913.1 (obligation to sons autftdOnt residential
ut Q ;e request for ft and 65935 (retxd� to do WLy baAU=S). ror pupoaca
rasolved sedmt the city. »the court is ashes pa�ca to assume these issues are
Clues wishing to add their umes to the 11 brief bci aubiu[ttcd on behalf of Joining cities
should �ao�utact tha brim writer, Christi 1.105 , at their Oulicst o
response form ie pz de4 below foe Your 'om►en'enae. Christi'= tel e m mbar iR 310/45b-
2489, if you hAVe TIestinMA ahnUt the brief or can offer any materials W C7 may be of
aulstance.
For further Informal about the care Itself, contACt special Kati�euH .-Itnne at *K /fA4 -71R8 or the city anOMCY• Dan H ntschke, the cilY Of
19115.8nside.
n&nk you for your elttcntion to this request.
FAX PMPONSR FORM
(Retnm by Angnst 7 it at sit poulblej
TO$ C b&d HO" (FAX 31014S643S6)
CIt7► Aft8t'0y. Malibu
FROM: J
(� nay of
DATE.-
RS: Joinder in i1el )m v, IMansida AIIxicus Brief
Please a4d the following dty(iss) to your brief on behalf of Joining cities in the above case:
great ea . "NY much for your work on behalf of cities in this Inxportnnt matter. it means a
great deal.
k1k1�H•�aw.e�x
JLL 28 194 16:03 213 236 2700
PAM. 001