HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1994 1116 CC REG ITEM 11BA G E N D A R E P O R T
C I T Y O F M O O R P A R K
ITEM A 8•
TO: The Honorable City Council �
FROM: Jaime Aguilera, Director of Community Developments /
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Senior Planner 5)5 —1
DATE: November 8, 1994 (CC Meeting of 11- 16 -94)
SUBJECT: CONSIDER ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE
REGIONAL TRAILS & PATHWAYS MASTER PLAN
Background
In April 1993, the County of Ventura initiated preparation of a
master plan for non - motorized transportation. A public advisory
committee, the Regional Trails Advisory Committee, was formed to
identify the issues, determine the scope of study work, and to
guide the planning effort. Attached is a letter from Ron
Blakemore, the Regional Trails & Pathways Program Administrator.
He has requested that the City of Moorpark adopt a resolution in
support of adoption of the Regional Trails & Pathways Master Plan
by the Ventura County Board of Supervisors, and he has requested
City input as to the organizational structure that is best suited
to manage and implement the Master Plan. Also attached is the
Executive Summary from the Draft Master Plan.
Discussion
Staff supports the adoption of a Regional Trails & Pathways Master
Plan by the County Board of Supervisors. The Community Development
Department has previously provided, to Mr. Blakemore,
recommendations for revisions to the Regional Trails Advisory
Committee's Recommended Non - Motorized Primary System & Feeder
Pathways. Those revisions have not yet been made. Although staff
agrees with the primary system corridors that are shown on the
attached maps, we do not, in all cases, agree with the type of
pathway identified. Also, we believe that there are additional
opportunities for feeder pathways, that are not currently shown on
the attached maps.
The primary system corridors that are shown on the attached maps
for the City of Moorpark are Los Angeles Avenue, the Arroyo Simi,
Spring Road between the Arroyo Simi and Tierra Rejada Road, and the
portion of Tierra Rejada Road between Spring Road and State Route
23. The feeder system corridors that are mapped for the Moorpark
area are primarily the existing Class 2 bikeways (painted bike
00147
The Honorable City Council
November 8, 1994
Page 2
lanes) , such as on Tierra Re j ada Road and Campus Park Drive and
planned Class M pathways (refer to attached Executive Summary for
definition) in the Happy Camp Canyon Regional Park and Specific
Plan No. 8 areas.
Staff's comments on the proposed primary and feeder system are
essentially the same as those previously provided to the County.
The attached maps should be revised to be more consistent with the
City's Circulation Element, except as discussed below. The planned
multi- use /equestrian trails included on Figure 4 (Equestrian Trail
Network) in the City's Circulation Element should be shown as
planned Class M pathways. The text in the City's Circulation
Element clarifies that bicycle use on equestrian trails is
generally considered compatible. In addition, staff recommends
that the proposed Class 1 pathways that are shown on the attached
maps along Los Angeles Avenue, Spring Road, and Tierra Rejada Road
be changed to Class 2 pathways, and that the City's proposed
bicycle /pedestrian bridge over the Arroyo Simi (near Liberty Bell
Road) be shown on the recommended primary system map.
Staff is recommending that the regional trails and pathways feeder
system differ from the City's Circulation Element for three planned
corridors. One such corridor is along the Arroyo Simi. At the
time that the Circulation Element was updated in 1992, there was no
expectation that a bikeway could be constructed along the Arroyo
Simi; therefore, only a planned equestrian trail was shown along a
portion of the Arroyo. Given that the Board of Supervisors now
supports use of flood control maintenance roads for development of
bikeways and recreational pathways, staff supports the proposal for
a Class 1 pathway along the Arroyo Simi corridor, consistent with
the attached map showing the recommended primary system. Another
change from the Circulation Element that staff is recommending is
for the segment of Spring Road between New Los Angeles Avenue and
High Street and for the segment of Los Angeles Avenue between
Spring Road and Princeton Avenue. Currently Figure 3 (Bikeway
Element) in the City's Circulation Element shows Class 3 bikeways
(bike route identified by sign only) for those roadway segments.
Given that the City will soon have jurisdiction over those roadway
segments, versus Caltrans, staff is suggesting that it may be
appropriate to show planned Class 2 pathways as part of the
regional feeder system. The eastern segment of Los Angeles Avenue
provides the only feasible bikeway linkage between the northeastern
area of the City (including the Campus Park and Varsity Park areas)
and the remainder of the City. Improved bicycle and pedestrian
access would be desirable for both Los Angeles Avenue and Spring
Road.
11 �:
The Honorable City Council
November 8, 1994
Page 3
Mr. Blakemore's letter also requests that the City Council provide
input as to the organizational structure the City of Moorpark feels
is best suited to manage and implement the Master Plan. The
attached Executive Summary identifies that the process of defining
an organizational structure will be largely dependent on a more
precise definition of the role the County wishes to take in non-
motorized transportation, and that a first step in defining this
role is preparation of a Phase 2 Implementation Plan. As an
interim measure, the Regional Trails Advisory Committee has
recommended that a Regional Trails & Pathways Program be formalized
in County government. Staff supports preparation of an
Implementation Plan; however, we do not have enough information to
recommend, at this time, the appropriate organization for
coordination. We wouldn't want to see an organizational structure
created that would divert funds otherwise available for bicycle
facility improvement projects to pay for County administrative
costs.
Information that staff would want to see given further
consideration in the proposed Implementation Plan would be
recommendations for how liability coverage would be provided for
regional pathways, as well as discussion regarding how such
pathways would be maintained.
Recommendation
Adopt a Resolution of Support for the Regional Trails & Pathways
Master Plan, and direct staff to prepare a letter to the County
Board of Supervisors, which clarifies that the City is requesting
revisions to the Recommended Primary System and Feeder Pathways
Maps, as addressed in the staff report.
Attachments:
1. Letter from Ron Blakemore dated 10 -26 -94
2. Executive Summary of the Regional Trails & Pathways Master Plan
(including maps)
3. Draft Resolution
11 o.
lArp, Regional Trails & Pothways Program
J
October 26, 1994
CITY OF MOORPARK
CITY COUNCIL
799 MOORPARK AVE
MOORPARK, CA 93021
Attention: Paul Lawrason, Mayor
Subject: Regional Trails & Pathways Master Plan
Dear Mayor Lawrason:
We are writing to request the City of Moorpark's support of the Regional Trails &
Pathways master Plan. Below are the recommended actions and a draft Resolution
of Support for consideration by the City Council
Recommendations:
1. Adopt a resolution in support of adoption of the Regional Trails &
Pathways Master Plan by the Ventura County Board of Supervisors, and,
2. Provide input as to the organizational structure the City of Moorpark feels
is best suited to manage and implement the Master Plan.
Discussion: Master Plan
Enclosed is the Executive Summary of the Regional Trails & Pathways Master Plan
for the Ventura County region. We are requesting City of Moorpark review and
endorsement of the plan as presented.
In April of 1993, the County of Ventura initiated preparation of a master plan for
non - motorized transportation. Since that time, the Regional Trails Advisory
Committee (RTAC), has prepared the Master Plan in cooperation with the local and
regional governments, user groups, and the private sector on a countywide basis.
The Master Plan sets the framework for non - motorized transportation in the County
of Ventura for the future. It is the intent of the Ventura County Board of Supervisors
to develop this plan to provide safe non - motorized mobility options for all citizens,
workers, and visitors.
00150
® �_�)U'1'•y �, .. "1�1f1r7 • � i f1.S • �l)�' .. 1� .. i� • ��rL�f 1. __. .�l r')�; �'. �_ ��•J�
G :� 1W -NGv Oar
City of Moorpark
October 24, 1994
Page 2
The plan integrates the commuting and recreation systems with the motorized
transportation network. It targets the implementation of safe non - motorized
transportation facilities that provides linkages to schools, community services,
government facilities, recreation services, and transit services. It emphasizes multi -
modal transportation for both recreation and commuting.
The plan was prepared by The Regional Trails Advisory Committee (RTAC), a 38
member citizens advisory group appointed by the County Board of Supervisors.
RTAC guided the development of the plan and preparation of the draft document.
The City's representative on this committee was Mayor Lawrason. In addition, a
Technical Advisory Group assisted County staff in the development of technical
information addressing specific issues. Chris Adams and Debbie Traffenstedt of
your staff, served on this group. The plan has been reviewed by numerous
governments, advisory bodies, special interest groups, and the community at large.
As a result of extensive input from these agencies, individuals, and organizations,
we are recommending your endorsement prior to bringing the plan to the Ventura
County Board of Supervisors for adoption
Discussion: Organizational Structure
The Master Plan calls for development of an implementation plan as a Phase 2
effort. In order to begin the implementation process, it is necessary to identify the
organization responsible for carrying out the master plan. There are two distinct
processes involved in this issue. First, the Master Plan is a true regional plan that
coordinates all non - motorized transportation activities. It is a dynamic process that
serves to guide regional efforts and facilitates coordination of the activities of
numerous agencies involved in trail and pathway activities. The focus is
coordination of activities and continual maintenance of the plan. Second, the
purpose of the implementation process is to develop, operate and maintain services
and facilities. This element of the program is action oriented and proposes an
extensive array activities necessary to fund, operate, and manage the program. We
are seeking City input to help determine the most effective organization to carry out
these functions.
Finally, the City's endorsement is not a comittment of resources. We are not
requesting any financial participation. We are only requesting your support of the
concepts presented in the master plan as represented by the enclosed Executive
Summary.
00151
City of Moorpark
October 26, 1994
Page 3
I would like to make a presentation of the proposal to the City Council as quickly as
may be possible, and would appreciate anything you could do to move the item to
the Council agenda.
If you have any questions about this proposal, please call me at 654 -3962.
Sincerely,
A4P����
Ronald E. Blakemore, ASLA
Program Administrator
Enclosure:
C: Chris Adams
REOEWSW OOR_ttr.doc
00152
VENTURA COUNTY REGIONAL TRAILS & PATHWAYS MASTER PLAN
VISION STATEMENT
The vision of this program is a County of travelers, commuters, and recreationists
with new opportunities to use non - motorized transportation as a part of their
everyday life. They may use many forms of non - motorized transportation to access
a carpool, bus, train, or airport as part of a new intermodal travel pattern or they
may prefer to walk or bike all the way to their destination. Many will find they do not
have to use a motor vehicle for trips to the store, work, school, recreation, or city
hall and library. They will like the feeling of doing something for the community and
themselves and their :hildren.
New and enhanced facilities and services along the way will make the trip safer and
more convenient than taking the car. New pathways will clearly indicate the non -
motorized traveler's place along shared travel corridors and roadways. Interference
between motorized and non - motorized travelers will be minimized.
Urban pedestrian routes are continuous and barrier free. Bicycling facilities are
designed into the road system in mixed traffic and on separate facilities shared with
other non - motorized uses for safer travel. Numerous shared corridors both in and
between cities provide safe, direct, and reasonable non - motorized facilities for
traveling and recreation throughout the County. Longer trips by walking and bicycle
are made convenient through new mass transit facilities that interface with the non -
motorized system. Laws protecting non - motorized travelers will be adopted and
enforced.
At the destination point, facilities for storing bicycles and personal possessions will
be clean and reasonably priced. At employment centers, showers will be common
and convenient. Employers will participate in these services as their contribution
the relief of traffic congestion and cleaner air.
The non - motorized system will provide for a balance in the mix of recreation and
transportation travel to meet the needs of both kinds of users.
Motorized travelers will be better educated on the rights of non - motorized users.
Integration of the motorized and non - motorized transportation systems will yield
multiple benefits to through closely coordinated planning of both systems. An
entirely new culture of mutual respect will grow as a result of training and education
as well as from community participation in developing and operating the pathway
system.
Individuals will understand the importance of their transportation decisions and the
contributions to personal health and the health of society as a whole.
This program will provide new levels of personal mobility at modest cost while
encouraging cleaner air and a healthier population. Non - motorized transportation
will become as socially acceptable as driving a motor vehicle.
The vision is to create a changed transportation system that offers choices among
travel modes. It presents us with an opportunity to offer real choices that meet the
needs of the individual and society as a whole. Making this vision a reality must
begin
00153
VENTURA COUNTY
NON - MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION
MASTER PLAN
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
The Regional non - Motorized Transportation Plan has been drafted as the result of work by the
Regional Trails Advisory Committee (RTAC). The proposed plan fulfills the stated purpose of
the study - "...the development of a plan for a regional non - motorized transportation
network to be known as the Regional Trails and Pathways Program. In addition, it
addresses the need to -"...promote safe, direct, and reasonable accommodations for non -
motorized transportation and recreational travel throughout the region.
PURPOSE OF THE MASTER PLAN
The purpose of the master plan is the development of a comprehensive plan for a regional non -
motorized transportation network to be known as the Regional Trails and Pathways Program.
This planning effort is intended to identify needs and promote safe, direct, and reasonable
accommodations for non - motorized transportation and recreational travel throughout the region.
At the outset, the Ventura County Board of Supervisors asked four key questions that led to the
examination of a NMT program. These questions are directed to four specific areas:
• Is there a need for a system?
• What form should it take?
• How should it be financed?
• How should it be managed and operated?
In order to provide clear answers to the questions, the Ventura County Board of Supervisors
directed that this study be undertaken.
PROCESS
The planning process for the Master Plan consisted of the formation of a public advisory
committee, the Regional Trails Advisory Committee (RTAC), which identified the issues,
determined the scope of study work, held public meetings, and guided the planning effort. In
addition to RTAC, a technical advisory group was formed to provide technical assistance to
00154
representatives and government and special interests (environmental, handicapped, etc.) make
up the rest.
Planning for the NMT System included:
1. Inventory of facilities and components that relate to an NMT System
• Existing trails and bikeways in Ventura County, (includes cities and special districts)
• Planned trails and bikeways in Ventura County, (includes cities and spec al districts)
• Resources and constraining components
• Existing motorized transportation system
• Community Services
• Political boundaries
• The interface between motorized /non- motorized transportation facilities
2. Assessment of existing and planned (included in general plan document) conditions
3. Potential NMT routes and destinations (corridors) were developed
4. Public meetings for open discussion and resolution of conflicting points of view
5. Hearings to solicit public input
6. Revisions to master plan that reflect new information and/or users
7. Presented to local agencies at the staff and advisory body level for additional comment
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.
Six major sets of issues have been identified as having significant impact on NMT System
for Ventura County. Recommended principles for each set of issues upon which an
implementation plan may be based are summarized below. Some unresolved issues
remain. RTAC recommends that these issues be addressed when the Implementation Plan
is developed.
1. Planning and Prioritization.
Recommended General Principles:
• An acceptable process to evaluate and prioritize regional planning and implementation
projects
• A methodology for collecting and assessing NMT demand
• A process to monitor and update the NMT Master Plan at periodic intervals
• An Implementation Plan and policy document to manage the NMT System that will
provide for
• A coordination system or methodology to incorporate recommendations of the
NMT Master Plan with regional applications of any pathway developed
• A priority system to evaluate and guide development and completion of the NMT
System
00155
2. Access and Liability.
Recommended General Principles:
• An access plan that fosters use, and minimizes the risk of damage to public and private
property
• Non - motorized facility development standards, operation standards, and maintenance
standards that promote public access and discourage trespass a
• Cooperative law enforcement and recreation programs that protect public and private
property, wildlife habitat, and public safety
• Mitigate damage to natural resources, public property and facilities, and private property
• An education program for the general public, private landowners, and trail users, that will
inform them of their responsibilities, rights, and appropriate trail and pathway use and
behavior
• A program that proactively seeks and integrates input from diverse cultural groups into
the planning and implementation process
• Access standards that promote use by the disabled where reasonable and possible and
in compliance with the spirit of Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
3. Facility Planning, Development and Administrative Standards.
Recommended General Principles:
• Minimum standards and /or prototype models, developed through consensus between
participating agencies, for planning and development projects to promote consistency
throughout the NMT System
• Regional NMT standards adopted through consensus, by all jurisdictions within the
regional network
• Minimum standards for linkages and connections between jurisdictions
• Design guidelines that reflect public safety and protection of public and private property
4. Jurisdictional Coordination.
Recommended General Principles:
• Mechanisms that promote the coordination of activities, programs, planning, and actions
throughout the NMT System
• Model documents to assist in promoting cooperation between agencies. Such
documents may include resolutions, Memoranda of Agreement (or Understanding), Joint
Powers Authority, standards and criteria, and others
• A directory of agencies/ organizations who have jurisdiction over any aspect of NMT
System in the Ventura County region and in adjacent counties
• A program that promotes consensus and facilitates coordination of the NMT System and
cooperation between jurisdictions
5. Multiple -Use.
Recommended General Principles:
00156
• Maximize opportunities to create shared use throughout the NMT system that
accommodates the greatest number and type of NMT modes within common corridors
• The concept of shared use intended to include bicycles, pedestrians, hikers, mountain
bikes, equestrians, and users with disabilities
• NMT "freeways" to support the need for non - motorized transportation throughout the
region
• Maximum opportunities to create shared NMT use within existing and planned linear
corridors such as flood control channels, road rights -of -way and utility easements
• Shared use criteria as the standard of measurement
• Shared use including educational programs and volunteer efforts in promoting
compatibility among users, and educational resources to disseminate the benefits and
etiquette for shared use facilities.
• Cooperation between jurisdictions to promote and facilitate shared use facilities
• Shared use pathways must to protect the health, safety and welfare of the user and the
environment
6. Resources.
Recommended General Principles:
• Extensive use of non - traditional resources to finance implementation of the NMT System
• Use of non - traditional methods to finance long term support of the NMT System
• Sound stewardship practices in allocating and managing resources
• Use of resource pooling to leverage financing and other resources
• Methods that promote the wise use, conservation, and preservation of the outdoor
environment
• Public/private relationships through an stewardship program
• Compilation and maintenance of resource information directory
NEED
FORM
A Non - motorized Transportation System in Ventura County is one of several components of
the regional transportation mix which includes mass transit, ride sharing, car and van
pooling, rail and light rail systems, alternative energy vehicles, and as such, needs to be
formally recognized as a part of the regional transportation system. Additionally, a NMT
System will greatly aid in meeting federally mandated requirements for air quality. Of all
transportation modes, NMT is the only non - polluting alternative available.
All areas of the County have elements of a NMT System which serves recreation and
transportation. A region wide system for linking these individual elements is a logical
extension. The difference between transportation and recreation cannot be distinguished
except in the mind of the user and therefore, it makes little sense to separate the two.
Based on information collected and input received from RTAC, interested citizens, and local
and state government agencies, a regional trails and pathway system is best addressed as a
regional issue. In order for a NMT System to function properly as one component of the
001 K7
regional transportation system, a master plan that conceptualizes the overall form that the
system should take needs to be adopted. Responsibilities should focus in two areas
• Coordination and monitoring of efforts to implement the entire system.
• Implementation of the County Primary System as the connecting link among all areas of
the County.
i
FINANCING
Funding mechanisms will need to be identified in terms of the specific relationship to the NMT
program. Future funding for implementing the master plan should be generated through non-
traditional sources to the greatest degree possible. In designing the non - motorized
transportation program, it is necessary to identify what are the services and facilities proposed by
the Master Plan and then address how they are to be implemented.
A financial plan will be prepared as a part of the Phase 2 Implementation Plan. The financial
plan should have a goal of the program becoming financially independent within five years of the
initiation of implementation.
ORGANIZATION
This question is one of the most difficult to address since there are competing priorities within
nearly every alternative organization that is considered. In addition, there is a question of
financing the administrative responsibilities that may be assigned in order to implement the plan.
Under this concept, the responsible administrator would play an active role in securing the
financing and causing the development of the NMT System. Given the scope of the proposed
plan, it would seem appropriate that responsibility for coordination is most appropriate at a
county or regional level. RTAC has concluded that any organizational proposal must focus on 3
areas. These include;
• Independent Authority to Manage the Program.
• Minimal Consumption of County Resources
• Neutral and Focused Agenda.
Alternative Management Organizations
Consideration has been given to federal, state, regional, and local agencies who are involved in
recreation trails and non - motorized transportation. Given the scope of the proposed plan, a
countywide organization would seem most appropriate in the coordinating role. The following
existing organizations were examined to determine the appropriateness of incorporating the
proposed program.
Regional Agencies
• VCOG
VCTC
County Agencies and Special Districts.
• General Services Agency, Recreation Services
• Resource Management Agency
• Public Works Agency Transportation Department
00158
• Public Works Agency, Flood Control District
• Air Pollution Control District
Local Special Districts and Cities
Cities and special districts presently administer trails programs in Ventura County. These
governments conduct many successful programs but have limited jurisdiction. Most cities have
several programs residing within different departments including public works, recreation and
mass transit systems
Other Altematives
• Independent Special District
• Joint Powers Authority
• Publiclprivate Business Cooperative
The process of defining an organizational structure will be largely dependent on a more precise
definition of the role the County wishes to take in NMT. A first step in defining this role is
preparation of the Phase 2 Implementation Plan. As an interim measure, RTAC recommends
that a Regional Trails & Pathways Program be formalized in County government. The
recognition will provide the numerous agencies involved in NMT, a focal point for coordination of
the master plan.
FACILITY RECOMMENDATIONS
The recommended Regional Trails and Pathway System is based on a network of trails and
pathways that link all areas of the County east to west and north to south. The network is
multi- layered, having a variety of facilities that serve both recreation and transportation
needs. The purpose of creating this linkage is to promote non - motorized transportation use
by providing a non - motorized transportation system and integrate it with the motorized
network for convenient access to both systems For purposes of discussion, all NMT routes
are referred to as PATHWAYS.
PATHWAY FACILITY DEFINITIONS
DEFINITION: CLASS 1 PATHWAY
Class 1 Pathways are special facilities for the exclusive use Non - motorized Transportation
(NMT). Such facilities are separated from motor vehicle facilities by physical space or
barrier and are suitable for a wide variety of NMT uses. This Class may be on a portion of a
street or highway right -of -way or on a special right -of -way not related to a motor vehicle
facility. It may be grade separated or have street crossings at designated locations. It is
identified with guide signing and may have pavement markings. It has at least one 10 foot
wide multi - directional lane, paved for bicycle commuting. An example of this class is the
Ojai Valley Trail between Ojai and Foster Park.
DEFINITION: CLASS 2 PATHWAY
The Class 2 Pathways includes a bike lane on the paved area of the street or roadway for
preferential use by bicycles and a hard surface pedestrian walkway adjacent to or near the
roadway curb for the exclusive use of pedestrians. The walkway may include an unpaved or
00 159:
soft surface trail in combination with or adjacent to the paved walkway for equestrian and or
pedestrian uses. The bike lane is usually located along the edge of the paved area or
between the parking lane and the first motor vehicle lane. It is identified by "Bike Lane"
guide signing and special lane lines and other pavement markings. Bicycles have exclusive
use of a bike lane for longitudinal travel, but must share it with motor vehicles and
pedestrians crossing it. There are extensive examples of this Class in most cities. An
example of this Class may be found along Westlake Boulevard south of Oakbrook Regional
Park in Thousand Oaks.
DEFINITION: CLASS 3 PATHWAY
The Class 3 Pathway is a bicycle route shared with motor vehicles and, a pedestrian
walkway separated from and adjacent to the shared roadway. Class 3 facilities are identified
by "Bike Route" guide signing only. There are no special lane markings and bicycles share
the roadway with motor vehicles. Pedestrian walkways are not marked but are separated
from motor vehicles by a raised curb or other physical barrier. There are examples of this
Class in most cities and can be found along Poli Street, Santa Clara Street, and Thompson
Blvd. in the downtown area of the City of San Buenaventura.
DEFINITION: UNDESIGNATED BICYCLE ROUTE
The Class U is acknowledged within state law that permits bicycle use on state highways but
no provision such as signs, lane marking or grade separation is made for non - motorized use.
DEFINITION: CLASS M PATHWAY
The Class M Pathway is a special facility for the exclusive use of NMT and is physically
separated from motor vehicle facilities by space and physical barriers. Motor vehicles are
not permitted except on designated service trails or for maintenance, safety, or enforcement
purposes. This Class provides only one multi - directional lane of travel and may be hand or
soft surface. Class M Pathways are identified by guide signing and are not accessible to
motor vehicles. Examples of this class are found throughout the Rancho Simi and Conejo
Recreation and Park Districts and throughout the Santa Monica Mountains. Typical Class M
pathways include Rim of the Valley Trail and Backbone Trail in the Santa Monica Mountains,
Rocky Peak Trail in Simi Valley, Happy Camp Trail near Moorpark, Las Robles Trail in the
Conejo Valley, and Camino Cielo Trail in the Los Padres National Forest.
DEFINITION: INTERMODAL STAGING AREA.
This facility serves as a point of interface between motorized and non - motorized
transportation systems where transportation modes may be changed. It is accessible to
most forms of transportation including automobile, bus, car pool, rail, non - motorized, and
may include air and sea terminals. It is a key element in the NMT system as it is intended to
facilitate an transfer from motorized to non - motorized and vice versa. Non - motorized
transportation access facilities include bike and pedestrian pathways, bike lockers, weather
shelter, and an information kiosk for scheduling, ride share, and related information.
Additional support facilities include restroomslchanging rooms, drinking water and security
lighting. The closest example of this type of facility is the Oxnard Transit Center. Most park
and Ride lots and Metrolink stations in Ventura County are scheduled to have bike lockers
installed within the 1994 calendar year
00160
DEFINITION: PATHWAY STAGING AREA.
This facility is intended to function as a major point of access to the regional pathway
system. This facility provides for access to the regional NMT system at regular intervals and
should bike and pedestrian pathways, bike lockers, weather shelter, and an information kiosk
accommodate private vehicle parking and mass transit access where feasible. Facilities
should include direct access to regional pathways, bike security racks, weather shelter, and
an information kiosk. Support facilities include drinking water, restrooms ardrrest area/picnic
site. Pathway staging areas should be located in or near park sites whenever reasonable.
RECOMMENDED NON - MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
Class 1: Primary System
The framework for the system is a backbone network of Class 1 Multi -Use Pathways. This
network will accommodate highest priority uses and serve as the "Non- Motorized Freeway"
link between cities and regions. The Class 1 system is intended to provide frequent
connections to the motorized system for purposes of changing modes of transportation,
making connections with the mass transit system or carpool centers. Support facilities such
as bike lockers, staging areas, and restroom /shower facilities should be provided to
accommodate this transition from non - motorized to motorized modes. The development
standards will address multiple uses for bicyclists, runners, health walkers, equestrians,
skaters, pedestrians, and virtually all other forms of non - motorized transportation use. It
consists of the following major Class 1 routes. Numbers refer to the map designations only.
(See map # RPT -10)
LOCAL FEEDER SYSTEM
All communities in Ventura and nearby cities in adjacent Counties have planned and /or
established a local pathway system to serve local community needs. As a general rule , these
systems are limited to the geographic areas that lies within their political boundaries. These
Pathways provide away to feed or connect to ("Feeder" System) the Primary System which
serves the entire region and facilitates non - motorized travel from one city to another. In this
way, the extensive local networks should have the capacity to greatly enhance the use of the
regional system and the local system remains totally within the responsibility of local governing
bodies.
The Feeder System is likely to be the most intensively used for local short trips. With the
proposed Primary System in place, the potential for longer trips and commuting becomes
substantially more attractive. The recommended Feeder System consists of the following
Classes of Pathways.
Class 2: Commuter System
The Class 2 Pathway system is designed to serve the bicyclist commuter and is expected to
serve the greatest number of County residents on a regular daily basis. It is therefore the
largest and most extensive network. It is also the most easily implemented.
00161
Class 3: Pathway (Bike Route System)
The Class 3 system the more skilled cyclist for commuting and where possible includes
adjacent pedestrian walkways and equestrian paths. It consists of signs that designate the
route of bicycle travel and no other facilities are provided.
Class M: Recreation Trails & Pathways
The Class M system is a multiple use system serving recreation and to a limited degree,
non - motorized commuters. It is composed of facilities which will accommodate and support
the recreation user. In general, this system accommodates non - motorized recreation travel
connecting daily destinations.
SUMMARY
The benefits of an NMT System to the County of Ventura are extensive and range far beyond
recreation alone. The NMT system will provide for safe automobile free travel, open space
preservation, conservation of non - renewable resources, and relieving vehicle traffic congestion.
It also will benefit the local economy through business development in surrounding communities,
tourism and expenditures for goods and services.
00162
M
CC
O
O
L VALLEY
fl
. ' _ J
_
' • . PATHWAY
4 ;>
3 SAWA
CLARA
RP/ER
PATHWA`
c.4
f.
9
VALLEY
PATHWAY
-
I COASTAL
PATHWAY
CIL
A
to,
: '" I
/
OORPwRA-
P
TIIWAY
\
Ji
PATHWAY 1
y�
a/ O
(AINmaM)'`�I
�01(L!D (
ARROYO C
r
_
IATTWAY
SW
PATHWAY
f�
recommen
Jed
$ sA `\ J D 2
6B
non —moto
Ized
i0
■ ,R
rf, y N
o
-F
:r
primary sy
tem
-7v
,
u
-
1
COIKJO r
PATHWAY
r
i
10
COMEJO
PATHWAY
l
cOL..
LFGFND
NON - MOTORIZED TRANSPORTAT ON
f
r'wM q...r
I
PATHWAY
PAT//MAY
j ■Ram mniiiiiiiii CIR
• I Pathway
l'�jC
I I
_
�.-
A A A Mo
,I:.A /N.M. 51a9inq
A,.a
■
�•�•'^
10
■ ■ ■ Tra 1
Staging Argo
/'
1
Q gg gg Ra $$
i
CALLiORNIA
1 COASTAL
PATIIRAY /
'
I
i
I
i
!T
CO
O
O
regional
trails &
pathways
TITLE
Q)
2�
V)
r
V , �]�[
W V / n
E
E W
O
Q E �^^,,
W W
86
(DATE ,June 19941
DRAWING NUMBER
RTP- 11 -BBS
COUIM a vcwnrtA
Inn i ,"m RU •Vr