HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1993 0407 CC REG ITEM 11CAGENDA REPORT
CITY OF MOORPARK
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public Works
DATE: March 31, 1993 (Council Meeting 4 -7 -93)
ITEM HeCe
"FOR ?ARK, CAUFORN A
C 'y Council Mooting
t 199-3
ACTION:
By 4
SUBJECT: Consider for Setting the Date of a Public Hearing to
Consider the Annual Assessments for AD84 -2 and AD85 -1
• A • �L
This presents resolutions setting the date of a public hearing to
consider the levy of assessments for Assessment District AD84 -2 and
AD85 -1 for next fiscal year.
' • 317
Assessment District 84 -2 was formed in 1984 pursuant to the
provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972." This
assessment district was established to allow for the funding of
street lighting and parkway /median maintenance expenses through the
levying of assessments as provided for in the act.
Assessment District 85 -1 was formed in 1985 pursuant to the
provisions of the same act. This assessment district was
established to allow for the funding of parks maintenance expenses
through the levying of assessments as provided for in said act.
These costs are spread to all of the lots in the City by means of a
formula designed to spread said costs on the basis of benefit.
0-441N I PEO lien
A. Initiating Proceedings
On February 3, 1993, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 93-
909 [AD84 -2] and Resolution No. 93 -910 [AD85 -1] initiating the
proceedings required to consider the levy of assessments for the
subject Assessment Districts for Fiscal Year 1993/94. On that
date the City Council also selected the firm of Dwight French
and Associates to prepare the Engineer's Reports for those
districts. Those Engineer's reports are scheduled to be
presented to the City Council on May 5, 1993.
aa.9.. ph
Assessment District Public Hearing
Page 2
B. Public Hearing
The "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" ( Streets and Highways
Code) requires a public hearing to be held prior to the annual
levy of assessments in order to receive input and to hear any
protests to the proposed assessments. Recently enacted state
legislation now requires that, prior to consideration of any new
or increased assessment, notices of said public hearing shall be
mailed to the owners of the property to be assessed. Said
notices shall state the estimated amount of the proposed
assessment and shall be mailed at least forty -five (45) days
prior to the date of the hearing.
Consistent with past practices, the content of the Public
Hearing Notices is set forth in the attached draft Resolutions
setting the time and place of the public hearing. In order to
comply with the above mentioned legislation, for the first time
these resolutions include an Exhibit 'A' setting forth a
schedule of proposed assessments for each land use category.
The resolution states that the amount of the assessments to be
levied shall not exceed the amounts set forth in said exhibit.
In order to comply with the above mentioned legislation, the
required public hearing notices must be mailed prior to April
16, 1993. The logistics associated with a mass mailing of this
size require the notices to be finalized by April 9, 1993.
C. AD 85 -1
The Engineer's Report for AD 85 -1 to be presented to the City
Council on May 5, 1993, will be accompanied by a draft Parks
Department Budget for FY 1993/94. That draft budget will show
both current year -end anticipated expenses as well as projected
costs for next Fiscal Year. Preliminary figures indicate that
there will be an increase in parks maintenance costs next year
ad-94.ph
Assessment District Public Hearing
Page 3
due to the addition
of Arroyo Vista
Community
Park (12 months)
and Virginia Colony
Park (9 months).
This anticipated increase
is summarized as follows:
FY 1992/93
FY 1993/94
FY 1992 /93
anticipated
Proposed
Description
Budget ($)
Actual
Expgrises ($)
Total
456,534
398,345
516,494
Less General Fund (Capital)
23450
0
0
Subtotal
433,084
398,345
516,494
Less General Fund (xaintenance)
76,078
41,339
to be determined
Assessment Amount
357,006
357,006
to be determined
As you can see, the distribution of FY 1993/94 parks maintenance
costs between the Assessment District and the General Fund has
not yet been determined. In the past this decision was made as
a part of the budget review and approval process in June. In
that the new legislation requires advance notification of the
maximum amount of the assessments, the City Council and staff
must set this upper limit now without benefit of a full review
of projected General Fund revenues and expenses for next fiscal
year. This is a particular problem this year due the
uncertainties surrounding the status of State subvention
revenues to the City.
In order to assist the City Council in this decision, staff has
prepared the attached chart (Exhibit 1) listing a number of
alternative amounts for the General Fund contribution toward
Parks Maintenance Costs for FY 1993/94. Next to each alternate
is the amount of the remaining to be assessed and the estimated
annual assessment for a single family residential lot.
Also attached as Exhibit 2 is another chart comparing assessment
amounts for the following:
A: the actual amounts levied in FY 1991/92;
B: the amount of assessments which would have been required
to fully fund the program in FY 1992/93;
C: the actual amounts levied in FY 1992/93 after General Fund
contribution;
D: a proposed assessment amount for FY 1993/94 with a
comparable General Fund contribution; and
E: the amount of assessments required to fully fund the
program in FY 1993/94.
ad_94.ph
Assessment District Public Hearing
Page 4
Staff is requesting direction regarding the maximum amount of
the assessments to be identified in the public hearing notice.
The Exhibit 'A" included as a part of the attached Resolution
(Exhibit 3), shows the assessment amounts levied last year. It
is suggested that the City Council give consideration to the
assessment amounts listed in Column D of the above mentioned
comparison chart (Exhibit 2). Staff will modify the resolution,
if necessary, based on the action taken by the City Council.
D. AD 84 -2
The Engineer's Report for AD 84 -2 to be presented to the City
Council next month will be accompanied by a draft Budget for FY
1993/94. That draft budget will show both current year -end
anticipated expenses as well as projected costs for next Fiscal
Year. It is anticipated that the City -wide assessment for
street lighting and landscape maintenance will be less than the
amount of the assessment last year. The assessment amount for
each Zone of Benefit has been increased or decreased from last
year's assessment based on actual costs incurred and /or
anticipated.
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions:
1) determine the maximum assessment amount per single family lot
for AD 85 -1 (Parks) and direct staff to revise Exhibit 'A' to
the attached Resolution (Exhibit 3) accordingly.
2) adopt Resolution No. 93-1'30 (Exhibit 3), as revised by the
above action, declaring the City Council's intention to make
certain changes and to order the annual assessments for AD85-
1 for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1993 and ending June
30, 1994; and fixing June 2, 1993, at 7:00 p.m. as the date
and time of a public hearing to consider levying said
assessments.
3) adopt Resolution No. 93- (Exhibit 4) declaring the City
Council's intention to make certain changes and to order the
annual assessments for AD84 -2 for the fiscal year commencing
July 1, 1993 and ending June 30, 1994; and fixing June 2,
1993, at 7:00 p.m. as the date and time of a public hearing
to consider levying said assessments.
ed 94.ph
Assessment District Public Hearing
Page 5
Exhibit 1
Display of Various General Fund Contributions to Parks Maintenance Costs for
FY 1993 /94, and the Resaininq Amounts to be Funded by Assessment District AD 85 -1
FY 1993/94
Contribution
Estimated
Single - Family
Estimated
Pros Other
Total Annual
Residential
Budget
Sources ($)
Assessments M
Assessment ($)
516,494
159,494
357,000
* 33.00
516,494
125,494
391,000
35.00
516,494
106,494
410,000
37.00
516,494
88,494
428,000
39.00
516,494
** 69,494
447,000
41.00
516,494
50,494
466,000
43.00
516,494
29,494
487,000
45.00
516,494
9,494
507,000
47.00
516,494
0
516,494
48.03
Notes:
* Amount of Single - Family lot assessment in FY 1991/92 & FY 1992/93 was $33.20
** Amount of Budgeted General Fund Contribution toward these costs in FY 1992/93, was $76,078.
ad-94. ph
Exhibit 2
AD 85 -1 Assessment
Comparison
0
0
02- Apr -93
1
A
---- - - - - --
B
---- - - - - --
C
---- - - - - --
D
E
2
0.00
FY 1992/93
FY 1992/93
---- - - - - --
FY 1993/94
---- - - - - --
FY 1993/94
3
FY 1991/92
Fully
Actual
Partially
Fully
Description
---------- - - - - --
Budget
---- - - - - --
Funded
----
Budget
Funded
Funded
Budget
357,006
- - - - --
433,084
---- - - - - --
4331084
---- - - - - --
516,494
---- - - - - --
516,494
Less Gen Fund
0
0
76,078
88,494
0
Total Assessment
357,006
433,084
357,006
428,000
516,494
Use Code Assessment Amount
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
33.20
40.27
33.20
39.80
48.03
2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3
24.90
30.21
24.90
29.85
36.02
4
24.90
30.21
24.90
29.85
36.02
5
24.90
30.21
24.90
29.85
36.02
6
33.20
40.27
33.20
39.80
48.03
9
24.90
30.21
24.90
29.85
36.02
10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
11
167.97
203.76
167.97
201.37
243.01
12
167.97
203.76
167.97
201.37
243.01
15
559.90
679.21
559.90
671.24
810.03
16
1,679.70
2,037.64
1,679.70
2,013.72
2,430.09
17
167.97
203.76
167.97
201.37
243.01
18
335.94
407.53
335.94
402.74
486.02
19
335.94
407.53
335.94
402.74
486.02
21
167.00
202.59
167.00
200.21
241.61
24
167.97
203.76
167.97
201.37
243.01
25
167.97
203.76
167.97
201.37
243.01
26
55.99
67.92
55.99
67.12
81.00
30
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
31
671.88
815.06
671.88
805.49
972.03
32
223.96
271.69
223.96
268.50
324.01
33
167.97
203.76
167.97
201.37
243.01
38
167.97
203.76
167.97
201.37
243.01
44
111.98
135.84
111.98
134.25
162.01
46
111.98
135.84
111.98
134.25
162.01
48
111.98
135.84
111.98
134.25
162.01
49
111.98
135.84
111.98
134.25
162.01
51
111.98
135.84
111.98
134.25
162.01
53
111.98
135.84
111.98
134.25
162.01
54
111.98
135.84
111.98
134.25
162.01
55
111.98
135.84
111.98
134.25
162.01
57
111.98
135.84
111.98
134.25
162.01
61
111.98
135.84
111.98
134.25
162.01
69
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
83
55.99
67.92
55.99
67.12
81.00