HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1992 0108 CC SPC ITEM 08CCIO
ITEM
MOORPARK
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864
MEMORANDUM
TO: The Honorable City Council IV
FROM: Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community Developmen
DATE: December 23, 1991 (CC meeting of January 8, 1992)
SUBJECT: ULTRA LOW FLUSH REBATE PROGRAM - VENTURA COUNTY
WATERWORKS DISTRICT NO. 1
Background
The State requires all buildings constructed after January 1, 1992
to install water closets which use no more than 1.6 gallons per
flush (gpf). On February 6, 1990, the County Board of Supervisors
(Board) amended the Ventura County Building Code and Uniform
Plumbing Code (1988) Chapter 9, Section 914 requiring ultra -low
water consumption fixtures and devices in all new construction. On
June 5, 1990, the District's Rules and Regulations were revised to
include ultra -low toilets and Regulations were revised to include
ultra -low volume toilets with 1.6 gpf or less. Ordinance No. 132
was adopted by the City Council on October 17, 1991 amending the
Municipal Code by adding Sections 8.02.030 and 8.02.040 requiring
low water consumption fixtures and devices.
The Water Resources and Development Department of the County of
Ventura Public Works Agency is proposing participation in a water
rebate program along with Calleguas Municipal Water District (CMWD)
and Metropolitan Water District (MWD).
Discussion
This program will provide financial incentives to residents to
replace their existing high volume toilets with ultra -low flush
(ULF) toilets. A rebate of $100.00 per toilet retrofitted will be
offered. The program is anticipated to continue for two years
beginning December 1991. The ULF rebate program will be a
financial partnership between MWD, CMWD and the District. Only
existing single family residential units will be eligible for the
rebate program. Customers will be required to purchase and install
am approved ULF toilet, as list on the attached "List of Approved
ULF Toilets for Calleguas' retrofit Program ".
DR ?ARK. CALIFORNIA
c:. I C un-11 Mcotn9
cf 199? —
ACTION:
12:23:91 111:09amA: \FLUSH.PGM 1
PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. JOHN E. WOZNIAK SCOTT MONTGOMERY BERNARDO M. PEREZ ROY E. TALLEY JR.
Mavor Mayor Pro Tern Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember
I
The program will be implemented through a consultant retained by
the CMWD who will establish an office within the CMWD service area.
Among other responsibilities, the consultant will verify the
installation of ULF toilets and will install a low flow shower
head. CMWD is working with E.J. Harrison and Sons and S.P. Milling
regarding the recycling of the replaced toilets.
The County Board of Supervisors approved the Urban Water
Conservation Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on July 30, 1991.
The State Water Conservation Coalition's Urban Conservation Task
Force generated this MOU as a vehicle for achieving water
conservation on a State -wide basis. The MOU establishes an ongoing
voluntary commitment for urban water suppliers to use Urban Water
Conservation Best Management Practices (BMP). Under the BMP
process, urban water suppliers would implement proven water
conservation measures like the ULF retrofit program. The Board's
action on July 30, 1991 approved the ULF retrofit program.
On December 17, 1991, the Board approved an agreement with CMWD for
the ULF Program and waived the County Building and Safety fee and
permit requirement for the toilet fixtures replaced under the
rebate program. In a letter dated December 17, 1991 to the City
-- Manager, R.R. Pakala (Manager of the Water and Sanitation Services
Division of the water Resources and Development Department of the
County of Ventura), indicated that the City of Ventura has waived
the permit requirement and the City of Camarillo will be
recommending to the City Council that the permit requirement be
waived.
The County is requesting that the City either: 1) Waive the
Building Permit requirement for the customers participating in this
program, or 2) Accept the verification by the Consultant hired by
Calleguas Municipal Water District, to satisfy the Building and
Safety requirements. The County has requested that the City make
a decision on this matter prior to the Waterworks District
informing the customers of the details of the Program which will be
during the second week of January 1992.
A concern of the City's Building Official relates to potential
liability of the City by allowing another inspector do an
inspection of the toilet installation other than from the City.
This issue could be alleviated by obtaining a hold harmless
agreement from the County.
12:23:91 111:09amA: \FLUSH.PGM 2
Recommendation
1. Waive the requirement for a permit and fee for replacing high
volume toilets in single family residences with ultra -low
toilets under the condition that the County and /or Calleguas
Municipal Water District provides a hold harmless agreement
with the City.
2. Authorize the City Manager to sign the agreement subject to
language approval by the City attorney.
Attachment: Approved ULF Toilets for Calleguas' Retrofit Program
12:23:91 111:09amA:\FLUSX.PGM 3
I
c
MANUFACTURER MODEL
(TRADE NAViE)
UNIVERSAL - RUNDLE ATLAS 4090
(714) 259.8744 (4290/4490 Combination)
4092,4093,4095,4096
4097.4098,4099
AMEGA 4057, 4067
HANDICAP 4078
TAURUS 4058.4068
SATURN 4022,4023
CRANEMISER
3.660. 3.662
3.664,3.670
3.672.3.674
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. N1E7 ✓ C3 D T AQUA 414086.025 Combination)
(213) 657.7600 =92.203 (3081.017/4086.025 Combination)
ELDERLY NEW CADET AQUAMETER
2
168.128 (304 2.109140 €6.025 Combination)
3042,1021S1oan 111 Valve Combination)
MADERA AQUAMETER
2234.015
PLEBE AQUAMETER
2139,116
(3039.106 /4091.018 Combination)
SEARS 5560
(55601/5560' . Combination)
PORCHER, INC-
LE VENETO 9712
(213)212.6112
THE BARON R05
LAMOSA SAHARA
KILGORE PLUMBING
AII5GRO130.16,135.16
QUANTUM 150.1
PRODUCTS (MANSFIELD)
C 3180
SCADE
CASCADE
(714) 838.1170
CASCADE 3190
KOHLER COMPANY
WELLWORTH LPTE
K•3420•EB, X•3471, X•3404
(HLE9.1788
K•3421•PB,K•3490
nds
KA3501Sloan 111 Valve Combination
CRANE PLUMBING
ECONOMISER
(213) 233.3231
3.604,3 -605
3.606, 3.618
CRANEMISER
3.660. 3.662
3.664,3.670
3.672.3.674
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. N1E7 ✓ C3 D T AQUA 414086.025 Combination)
(213) 657.7600 =92.203 (3081.017/4086.025 Combination)
ELDERLY NEW CADET AQUAMETER
2
168.128 (304 2.109140 €6.025 Combination)
3042,1021S1oan 111 Valve Combination)
MADERA AQUAMETER
2234.015
PLEBE AQUAMETER
2139,116
(3039.106 /4091.018 Combination)
MANUFACTURER MODEL
(TRADE NAME)
BRIGGS INDUSTRIES INC' TURBOFLUSH
(114)666.1779 4700,4710,4740,4745
ULTRA CONSERVE
4720,4725
BEAU'IYWARE
280,281,282,283,284,287
257/Sloan 111 Valve Combination
2581SIoan 111 Valve Combination
VISCOUNT 11
7790/S10an 111 Valve Combination
NEW AFWALL AQUA -METER
GERBER PLUMBING
2257,103/Sloan 111 Valve Combination
7TTON INDUSTRIES
THE BARON R05
LAMOSA SAHARA
(213) 942.7322
PEERLESS POTTERY
HYDROMISER
(800)457.5785
5160,5161,
5164,5660
VTTROMEX
CORINTO
FABRICAS ORION
ARGUS
nds
In
SANTA FE C-4241
(CA340/C•1441 Combination)
MANUFACTURER MODEL
(TRADE NAME)
BRIGGS INDUSTRIES INC' TURBOFLUSH
(114)666.1779 4700,4710,4740,4745
ULTRA CONSERVE
4720,4725
BEAU'IYWARE
280,281,282,283,284,287
257/Sloan 111 Valve Combination
2581SIoan 111 Valve Combination
VISCOUNT 11
7790/S10an 111 Valve Combination
PRESERVER
091. 4800.091.4805
091 -4815
AQUALIN E
AF46303, AF46403
CARLTON 9
77151SIoan 111 Valve Combin'0011
GERBER PLUMBING
ULTRA FLUSH
21-302,21-312
FD=RES CORP.
25.830/Sloan 111 Valve Combination
(2 13) 329.9029
NORRIS PLUMBING
516, 517, 536.537
FD=RES
(818)965.3394
TOTO KM' USA
LF•16R, LF•16E
(S00) 877.1541
ARTESIAN LNDUSTRIES
SANTA FE C-4241
(CA340/C•1441 Combination)
(213) 6686
SOMERSET LITE C4600
(420014800 Combination)
WESTERN POTTERY
712 W/S MARQUIS
COMPANY, INC.
512 W/S ARIS
822•LIC AR1S
(213)636.8124
83 2 CLINTON
SAVEX FANALOZA C1SA WC 6051
CERAMICAS
(1140C12251C Combination)
LNDUSTRIALES
N
ACORN
1000, loot, 1002.
1675,1679, 1680,
2100,2105,3330,
3331, 3332, 3333
1003,1004,1005,
1006,1684.1685,
1695, 2110,2115-
2120,3334.3335,
3336,3337,1415,
1418,1420,1426,
3315,3318
ELIER INDUSTRIES
ELJCR INDUS
ULTRA•ONE/G
()91.4600,091-4605
091 -4660, 091.470(1,
0914705
PRESERVER
091. 4800.091.4805
091 -4815
AQUALIN E
AF46303, AF46403
-- City Council
Page 2
December 23, 1991
The proposal must specify details about a project that prove to HUD
that it can progress rapidly, however, next years's proposal will
most likely be different because the matching fund requirement will
be in effect. There are no administrative funds identified for
this year or subsequent years, and so choosing a project that
entails this cost has to evaluated carefully.
The County proposed a quick solution to the problem of having a
short timeframe to work under without administrative support --
expanding the Section 8 rental assistance program. This proposal
would allow several families to be removed from the waiting list at
the Area Housing Authority, utilizing the existing administration.
A transmittal of the City's concerns regarding HOME funds will
accompany the CHAS comments proposed by staff because the County
has inserted the HOME rental assistance data into the CHAS.
Discussion
The Section 8 proposal for the use of HOME funds during 1992/93
does raise some serious concerns. It is staff's understanding that
there may be a lag time of two to three months between the transfer
of a client from the HOME sponsored program to the regular Section
8 program. This delay could potentially cause hardships for those
who must wait for the transfer of funding to be completed.
Subsequent years of receiving HOME funds will involve the matching
funds requirement which will most likely discourage the entitlement
group from considering this type of assistance in the future.
Therefore, Section 8 support would only be provided for one year.
Negative aspects of the Section 8 proposal have led staff to
believe that the best use for the HOME funds is new construction.
This is because new construction is more likely to be a long term
solution for the need of affordable housing, rather than a
temporary solution. Unfortunately, there are many details that
have to be addressed in order to move a new construction project
along quickly.
Local considerations addressed two potential projects which could
move quickly enough to be eligible for funding low and moderate
income housing opportunities. One consideration was a possible
first time home buyer program for the 27 unit condominium project
on Charles Street, but this is not an eligible use because the
construction began before the federal environmental standards were
considered, and the design of the housing units is above the
"luxury standards!' developed by HUD for the use of federal funds.
A second consideration is a housing assistance plan, but the
managing agency requires 250 of the grant for administration, and
this is not feasible.
City Council
Page 3
December 23, 1991
One city has identified a potential immediate need for the HOME
funds. New affordable rental units in Camarillo are in a position
to be developed now, but this only requires approximately $300,000.
No word has been received from the County as to whether they agree
with Camarillo's project as being feasible, and if so, what would
become of the balance of funds.
Because there are no immediate potential uses identified by staff
for the use of funds in Moorpark, staff is prepared to encourage
the County to fund projects like Camarillo's before supporting
temporary programs like the Section 8 rental assistance. With
Council's concurrence, staff will proceed by drafting a letter
which expresses this position on the City's behalf.
Recommendation
That the Council support staff's comments with any modifications
regarding the proposed use of HOME funds to the County, and request
that an alternative use for the funds be considered before further
consideration is given to the original proposed use of funds,
(support of the Section 8 rental assistance program).