Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1992 0219 CC REG ITEM 11DX90` arf TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Background MOORPARk TEM// 799 Mo- oark _, -ue 1.1 _orpa.-k. California 93021 (805) 529 -6861 CR ?ARK, CA!JFORN(.; City C -7 it Meeting of 19971 M E M O R A N D U M Honorable Citv Council �yyy Mary K. Lindley, Assistant to the City Manager\ February 12, 1992 (For Council Meeting 2/19) Regional Council of Governments The City has received t±�e summary report (distributed to Councilmembers earlier) frog the 47anuary 30, 1992 Regional Council of Governments (COG) Workshop held in Thousand Oaks. As you know, the Steering Committee presented its recommendation on several key issues related to the composition and function of the COG. Participants were asked to discuss the recommendations, present alternatives, and vote for _ pre=erence. The end result was an indication of how the majori :v of =he participants preferred to see the COG structured. Tmose z,eferences are as follows: - Mission & Authority - "he Regional Council would transition into a decision - making -ody to determine solutions to selected issues. The function c= the Council would also include joint problem solving between member agencies, advocacy, and education and informat_on_ -Membership - The Execu =ive Board would be comprised of five members from the Board cf Supervisors and one elected official from each city. The cities of Agoura Hills and Westlake Village will vo:e on =_I7 on mutually binding or impacting issues. Other cities �-i n=eighboring counties may join in the future as determined aapr,op_ iate by the COG. VCTC and the Waste Commission will 'e ex officio members and other county agency and organizations will be incorporated into advisory task forces. - Voting - Each member c= t-he Board of Directors will receive Regional Council of Governments February 19, 1992 Page 2 one vote. Alternates are allowed to vote, but must be elected officials. Affirmative votes from a majority of all Regional Council members are needed to pass a motion, i.e., eight votes regardless of the number of members actually present. - Staffing & Funding - The Regional Council would ultimately be staffed by an Executive Director and other necessary staff. Membership dues would be kept to a minimum. Dues would be based on a split of representation and population with the County paying approximately 29% of the determined dues amount and the cities dividing the -remainder. There were many alternative and minority preferences, other than the majority preferences, presented at the workshop and these have been included in the summary report. The Steering Committee is requesting that each City Council and the Board of Supervisors discuss the aforementioned issues and preferences and identify its choice, taking into consideration the discussion that developed at the workshop. Based on the input received, the Steering Committee will draft an agreement and by -laws which will be circulated to each jurisdiction for approval. Recommendation Staff recommends that Council make a decision on each of the above referenced issues and direct the Mayor to send a letter to the Steering Committee informing it of the Council's action.