Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1992 0415 CC REG ITEM 08H 1006.P :SeteMOORPARI TEM, . s al o�corst :/ 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529-6864 fo JJ" MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community Development" ) DATE: April 8, 1992 (CC meeting of April 15, 1992) SUBJECT: IPD 89-2 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION ON THE APPLICATION OF GENERAL OPTICS, INC. (MINOR MODIFICATION NO. 1) Background On April 1, 1992, the City Council referred this matter to the Community Development Committee for a recommendation to the City Council regarding Conditions of Approval that should be imposed on this Minor Modification to IPD 89-2 . On April 7, 1992, the Community Development Committee met to discuss this matter. The Community Development committee recommends that the City Council approve the Minor Modification with the attached Conditions of Approval. Staff Recommendation Approve the Minor Modification with the attached Conditions of Approval Attachments: 1. Conditions of Approval for Modification No. 1 to Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 89-2 CA[;c ,.',; Coun :I Moo I:ng Lf / / 199Z- / ,, j C i� # BY �-a - ' PP09:08:92/9:90amA:\IPD89-2.CC 1 PAUL W.LAWRASON JR. JOHN E.WOZNIAK SCOTT MONTGOMERY BERNARDO M.PEREZ ROY E.TALLEY JR. Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Printed On Recycled Paper CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MINOR MODIFICATION NO. 1 TO INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 89-2 NOTE: THESE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO MINOR MODIFICATION NO. 1 TO INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 89-2 ARE IN ADDITION TO THE EXISTING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 89-2 1. All facilities and uses other than those specifically requested in the application for IPD 89-2 are prohibited unless an application for a modification has been approved by the City of Moorpark. Any minor changes to this permit shall require the submittal of an application for a Minor Modification and any major changes to this permit shall require the submittal of a Major Modification as determined by the Director of Community Development. 2 . Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for tenant occupancy, the prospective tenant shall make application for a Business Registration Permit from the City. 3 . That unless the use is inaugurated (building foundation slab in place and substantial work in progress) not later than two (2 ) years after Modification No. 1 to Industrial Planned Development Permit No. 89-2 is granted, this permit shall automatically expire on that date. The Director of Community Development may, at his discretion, grant up to one ( 1) additional year extension for project inauguration if there has been no changes in the adjacent areas and if applicant can document that he has diligently worked towards inauguration of the project during the initial two year period. 4 . The Director of Community Development, or his designee, shall have the authority to conditionally approve or deny a zoning clearance request for tenant occupancy consistent with applicable sections of the Zoning Code. The cost of the zoning clearance shall be borne by the applicant for tenant occupancy. 5 . The applicant shall pay all outstanding case processing costs for processing of this Minor Modification within thirty (30) days of approval of the Minor Modification. 6 . Prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance, a Surety Performance Bond in the amount of $10,000 shall be filed and accepted by the Director of Community Development. The Director of Community Development, may, through a public hearing to be heard before the City Council recommend that any PP04:08:92/9:40awA:\IP089-2.CC 2 or all of the funds in the Performance Bond be forfeited for noncompliance of the Conditions of Approval or for some other just cause. This bond shall be in effect for a ten years from the date of the last occupancy allowed with this permit. The applicant or future owners agree to pay for all costs for enforcing condition compliance in the future. This condition shall automatically be superseded by a related resolution or ordinance regarding condition compliance for entitlement approvals adopted by the City Council . 7 . All trash areas and recycling bins shall be depicted on the construction plans, the size of which shall be approved by the Director of Community Development and the City employee responsible for recycling/solid waste management programs . 8 . Prior to the commencement of construction plan review by the City, the applicant, permittee, or successors in interest, shall submit to the Department of Community Development, a fee in the amount of $1,296 .00 to cover costs incurred by the Community Development Department for Condition Compliance review. 9 . Prior to occupancy, Ventura County APCD Air Pollution Control District (APCD) shall review all uses to ensure compliance with the California Health and Safety Code (Section 65850 .5 et seq. ) regarding the use, storage and disposition of hazardous materials . Final Certificate of Occupancies shall be withheld until compliance with these provisions from the Ventura County APCD is provided. Prior to any occupancy by any tenant or subsequent owner whose business would employ or dispose of hazardous materials, a Major Modification application shall be filed with the Department of Community Development and approved by the City. 10. The applicant and his successors, heirs, and assigns shall remove any graffiti within five (5) days from written notification by the City of Moorpark. All such graffiti removal shall be accomplished to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. PP09:08:92/9:90amA:\ZPD99-2.CC 3 John W. Newton & Associates, Inc. t � o fessn toaE eonsulptan.ti Madera Royale Plaza 1424 Madera Road. Suite 102 Simi Valley, California 93065 Telephone (8053 529-3651 Fax (805) 582-3263 April 15 , 1992 Mayor Paul W . Lawrason , Jr . Members of the City Council 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark , California 93021 Re : Item No . 8 .H . - CONSENT TIME EXTENSION , General Optics , Inc . Dear Mayor Lawrason and Members of the Council : First of all , thank you to the Community Development Committee and staff for recommending approval of the requested time extension , Condition No . 3 . It is reasonable and justified . However , General Optics has difficulty with other proposed conditions being applied to this "use inauguration" extension . Attached is the facesheet of the application denoting that it is a time extension request , only . Nothing in the City ' s adopted fee schedule indicates that a time extension application is a MINOR MODIFICATION . Nothing in the City ' s ordinance code defines a time extension as a modification of any type . Interestingly , we were required to pay 20% of the original deposit fee ($ 376 . 80) to make this request , which is the fee formula for a Minor Modification application . But , we didn ' t request a modification ; only a time extension . PD extensions aren ' t listed . Staff arbitrarily applies 20%. The essence of this first point is that we question the justification or basis in ordinance or policy which allows "conditioning" of a simple time extension . We do not think that this is appropriate , fair or necessary . The project has not changed , and the property owner is not proposing any changes . Should your Council determine in some way that conditioning this extension of time is a legitimate and necessary requirement for some substantive public health , welfare or safety reason , then we request the following amendments : CONDITION NO . 6: To remain as previously adopted (No . 38 attached) . General Optics , Inc . ' s bond company of ten (10) years , Century Insurance REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE MINERAL PEAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT Commercial . Industrial . Land RESOURCE Engineering . Land Division . Permits Residential Relocation DEVELOPMENT Planning . Zoning Mayor Lawrason & Members of the City Council April 15 , 1992 Page 2 Company , advised that although the company was a respected customer they would not issue such a bond . Century Insurance Representatives indicated that : " . . . perhaps a sub-standard company , with complete collatoralization and extraordinarily high fees , might . The fees would be required to be paid up front for all 10 years , and would be based upon all the difficulty the bonding company would anticipate managing and defending such a condition . " General Optics , Inc . has accepted the previous condition as inherited , although feels strongly that the City should not be "insuring against future non-compliance/violation behavior . " This sends a very negative message regarding the City ' s attitude towards business , and in particular , General Optics , whose performance in Moorpark over the last ten years obviates the need for this type of conditioning . This established local company does not violate the law . Again , General Optics , Inc . feels that it must , and has , accepted previous Condition No . 38 . We now request your Council to direct staff to allow other forms of financial assurances as meeting the intent of Condition No . 38 such as a LETTER OF CREDIT , or CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT , since a bond is either not available , or economically impractical . AND , THAT THIS SURETY BE RELEASED UPON ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OPTICS , INC . ' S CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY . CONDITION NO . 8 : General Optics , Inc . respectfully requests that the costs associated with the Condition Compliance Review be reduced to $568 . 00 (8 hours ® $71/hour) for this reputable local firm . We cannot imagine that this review could take more than an entire work day , even with reading the file prior to the field check . Please keep in mind that Building & Safety will have monitored the entire construction process , and that other agencies such as the Fire Protection District , Environmental Health and Public Works will have conducted their sign off reviews for occupancy at the conclusion of construction . Community Development should then be limited to planning related conditions which simply could not take an entire day to review , but the company will live with that . Thank you for your consideration . S ' ely , AttachmentsAir • W . Newton cc : Ken Scribner Dennis Hotchkiss • c � , e4 OF MOORPARK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FORM CASE FILE NO. IPD 89-2 ENTITLEMENT REQUEST Pursuant to the Moorpark City Ordinance Code and/or the California Government Code, this application is made for the following entitlement(s) : New Major Minor Time Mod. Mod. Ext. Tract Map General Plan Amendment Parcel Map Zone Change Conditional Use Permit Variance Commercial PD Permit Parcel Map Waiver Residential PD Permit Vot Line Adjustment siii+ _____. —I-_ Industrial PD Permit Variance Variance: Other Certificate of Compliance Conditional Certificate of Compliance Project Location (Street address or description) 5384 kazuko Court , Moorpark Assessor's Parcel Number(s) 511-0-070-720 Zoning: Present M-1 Proposed (if applicable) Description of Request: Amend Condition No . 3 to allow two (2) additional years for use inauguration , plus a one ( 1) year staff authorized extensionfif justified . Non-City Agency Entitlement Required (attach list if necessary) : Agency Type of Permit/Entitlement Application filed: 1. yes no 2. yes no AUTHORIZATION APPLICANT: Applicant is _ Owner, _ Lessee, or X has power of attorney John W. Newton (805 ) 529-3651 Name (Please Print) John W.Newton &ASSOciates,InC. Telephone 1424 Madera Road , Suite 102 Address Simi Valley , CA 93065 City, State Zip I hereby make application for the above referenced land use entitlement and certify t. t the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best •y nowleddgge. _v �EtL GI March 13 , 1992 'gnature Date 1/92 Page -1- -/ ' 7 INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO: IPD-89-2 APPLICANT: ANNOTTI AND PETRILLI DATE: APRIL 4, 1990 the ambient noise level at the property line measured at the time of the occupant request. Prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance for initial occupancy or any subsequent occupancy, the Director of Community Development may request that a noise study be submitted for review and approval which demonstrates that all on-site noise generation sources would be mitigated to the required level. The noise study must be prepared by a licensed acoustical engineer in accordance with accepted engineering standards. 091/b 38.® Prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance, a Surety' Performance Bond in the amount of $10, 000 shall be filed and accepted by the Director of Community Development. The Director of Community Development, may, through a public hearing to be heard before the City Council recommend that any or all of the funds in the Performance Bond be forfeited for noncompliance of ' the Conditions of Approval or for some other just cause. This condition shall automatically be superseded by a related resolution or ordinance regarding condition compliance for entitlement approvals adopted by the City Council. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, TUB FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 39 . An "Unconditional Will Serve Letter" for water and sewer service will be obtained from the Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1. 40. The applicant shall pay all school assessment fees levied by the Moorpark Unified School District. 41. If any archaeological or historical finds are uncovered during excavation operations, the permittee shall assure the preservation of the site; shall obtain the services of a qualified archaeologist to recommend disposition of the site; and shall obtain the Director of Community Development's written concurrence of the recommended disposition before resuming development. PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 42. All parking areas shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete and shall include adequate provisions for drainage, striping and appropriate wheel blocks, curbs, or posts in parking areas adjacent to landscaped areas. • 43 . All landscaping and planting shall be installed and inspected. 44 . That a 6 ' high wall measured from the maximum height of the grade within five feet of the property line shall be installed prior to the final inspection for receipt of Certificate of Occupancy. Prior to construction of the. wall, the residential homeowner shall determine the location of the wall. The same materials shall be used for the wall from lot to lot. c:\cond\ipd892 rev. 4/12/90 - 6