Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1992 0506 CC REG ITEM 08MireM ER- NY. MOORPARK 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 M E M O R A N D U M (805) 529 -6864 MOOR ?ARK, CALIF017MA City Coungil Mcotn3 of 5 , ACTION I: By %!f TO: Honorable City Council FROM: Mary K. Lindley, Assistant to the City Manager' ` DATE: April 21, 1992 (May 6 City Council Meeting) SUBJECT: Consider State Legislative Bills Concerning the Brown Act Summary There are currently two bills before the State Legislature that present concerns for cities, SB 1538 (Kopp) and AB 3476 (Burton). Both of these bills would amend the Brown Act and, if adopted, will impact City Council meetings and the meetings of other public agencies and committees. Staff is requesting that the City Council consider opposing both SB 1538 and AB 3476, in their current forms. Background The Brown Act generally requires that the meetings of the legislative bodies of local agencies be conducted openly, with specified exceptions. Among other things, the Act makes certain notice requirements concerning public meetings and makes it a misdemeanor for a member of a legislative body to attend a meeting where a violation occurs with knowledge of the fact that the meeting violates the Act. In their current form, SB 1538 and AB 3476 would impact City meetings in the following ways: SB 1538 - requires that attorney- client advice be given in open sessions. applies all of the Brown Act provisions to civic PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. JOHN E. WOZNIAK SCOTT MONTGOMERY BERNARDO M. PEREZ ROY E. TALLEY JR. Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Brown Act Legislation April 21, 1992 Page 2 committees which make recommendations to the legislative body but which are not created by the legislative body. AB 3476 requires immediate reporting of actions taken in closed session, including notice of issues that will disadvantage citizens in ongoing negotiations. requires that copies of all agenda packet material be distributed prior to meetings. requires a court to award attorney fees where a legislative body has violated the Act. SB 1538 and AB 3476 requires taping all closed sessions. The League of California Cities is working with Assembly Member Burton (AB 3476) who has expressed a willingness to make changes to his bill that would address the concerns and needs of the agencies subject to the Brown Act. The bill is scheduled to be heard by the Assembly Ways and Means Committee. Cities are asked to urge Assembly Member Burton and the members of the Ways and Means Committee to continue to work with the League to amend AB 3476 to remove the offending provisions. Senate Bill 1535 was approved by the Senate Local Government Committee on March 27. It is scheduled to be heard by the Senate Rules Committee next. Cities are asked to contact the Senate Rules Committee members and urge them to vote "no" on this bill. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Council direct the Mayor to send letters to the appropriate State legislators: 1) Urging continued work on AB 3476 by the Assembly Ways and Means Committee to remove offending provisions, and 2) Expressing the City's opposition to AB 1538 and urge the Senate Rules Committee to vote "no" on the bill.