The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAGENDA REPORT 1992 0520 CC REG ITEM 08JMOORPARK 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 M E M O R A N D U M TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Ken Gilbert, Director of Public Works �- DATE: May 12, 1992 (Council Meeting 5- 20 -92) ITEM S• T •"" c WVV0 1l Meeting of S A U 199 ACTION; - s'd s 3 SUBJECT: Consider 1) Initiating Proceedings Required for the Annexation of Home Acres to AD84 -2; 2) Accepting the Engineer's Report for AD84 -2; and, 3) Setting the Date of a Public Hearing on Said Matters OVERVIEW This presents for approval the Engineer's Report for Assessment District AD84 -2 and requests that the City Council set the date of a public hearing to consider levying the assessments set forth therein. List of Exhibits Exhibit "A ": Engineer's Report Exhibit Exhibit "B": "C ": Summary of Fund Activity Draft Departmental Budget for FY 1992/93 Exhibit "D ": FY 1991/92 Expense History Detail Expense Projection Detail Exhibit "E": FY 1992/93 Detail Exhibit "F ": "G" Street Lighting Expense of Intent to Annex Home Acres Q - Exhibit Exhibit : "H": Resolution Resolution Approving Engineer's Report 9-1-r6 S �I Exhibit "I": Resolution Setting Public Hearing q Z _ q5 3 BACKGROUND Assessment District 84 -2 was formed in 1984 pursuant to the provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972." This assessment district was established to allow for the funding of street lighting and parkway /median maintenance expenses through the levying of assessments as provided for in the act. As set forth in the Engineer's Report (Exhibit "A"), there are two types of expenses, generally described as follows: 1) those expenses determined to be of general benefit to the community, which are spread to all of the lots in the City; and, 2) those expenses for the maintenance of improvements determined to be of benefit to the properties within an identified zone, which are spread to all of the lots within that zone. PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. JOHN E. WOZNIAK SCOTT MONTGOMERY BERNARDO M. PEREZ ROY E. TALLEY JR. Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Printed on Recvcled Paper Assessment District 84 -2 May 20, 1992 K For both the Citywide and Zone expenses, costs are distributed to all of the affected properties by means of a formula designed to spread said costs on the basis of benefit. The benefit spread formula identifies a number of factors (including lighting intensity, lighting security, people use, etc.) which are associated with benefits derived, and then weights those factors by land use as a means to determining benefits derived. The City must annually act to levy the parks maintenance assessments. Said assessments have been levied each year since the formation of the district. DISCUSSION A. Engineer's Report On March 25, 1992, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 92- 829 directing the preparation of the subject Engineer's Report. Said report has been prepared and is attached as Exhibit "A ". The Engineer's Report will generate revenues sufficient to fund the Personnel and Operations / Maintenance expenses associated with Street Landscaping and Lighting as set forth in Exhibits " C It and " E . " B. Citywide Assessment Those expenses considered to be of general benefit to the community include street lighting expenses, and landscape maintenance expenses for a number of parkways medians. A comparison of the annual Citywide assessment for a single - family lot is as follows: Elements FY 1991/92 FY 1992/93 Landscape Maintenance $6.00 $7.85 Street Lighting $27.40 $24.46 Total $33.40 $32.31 The amount of the proposed FY1992/93 assessments for other land uses are set forth in Appendix 'C' of the Engineer's Report. C. Zones of Benefit 1. West Village Buffer Area The amounts to be assessed to the respective lots in each Zone of Benefit are listed in Appendix "B" of the Engineer's Assessment District 84 -2 May 20, 1992 3 Report. Included in that list for the first time this year is an additional Zone of Benefit for the West Village Buffer Area (Zone 8). That Zone includes an area outside of the City, known as Home Acres, which is to be annexed to Assessment District 84 -2. Under the provisions of a Joint Powers Agreement between the City and the County of Ventura, the area to be annexed, and the area within the City encompassed by Tracts 4340, 4341 and 4342, are to share the costs of developing and maintaining the Buffer Area, on a fifty -fifty basis. It is proposed that an improvement assessment of $21,000 be assessed to this new Zone this next fiscal year. It is anticipated that this amount would be the first of three such assessments required to generate funds sufficient to proceed with the design and construction of the Buffer Area. When sufficient funds have been accumulated, design and construction of the facility would proceed. Upon completion of construction, it is proposed that an annual maintenance assessment be levied on the properties within this new Zone of Benefit. Any surplus improvement assessments could be credited toward the first year's maintenance assessment. 2. Assessment Amounts A re -cap of the proposed annual assessment for each Zone of Benefit is as follows: one Tract No. of Lots Amount 1 2851 73 $65.41 2 2865 622 $102.51 3 3032 265 $5.07 4 3274 129 $12.98 5 3019/3525 224 $242.58 6 3306 22 $8.41 7 Industrial Park 91 $30.00 NE of L. A. Ave & Gabbert Rd 8 4340/4341/4342 525 $20.00 if Home Acres 209 $50.24 Assessment District 84 -2 May 20, 1992 D. Major Improvement Projects 4 A number of parkway and median improvement projects are proposed to be constructed this year. These projects are listed on pare 4 of Exhibit "E". All of these expenses are funded by prior year carry overs. No additional assessments are proposed for thee expenses. E. Extraordinary Costs The proposed program includes the funding of two one time projects: 1) the restoration of the slope on the south side of Tierra Rejada Road east of Peach Hill Road ($8,000); and, 2) the construction of improvements to the debris basin south of Sunnyslope Drive in Tract 2865 ($9,000). Although both of these needed projects are within Zone 2, it is recommended that these costs not be added to the annual zone assessment, but be funded from a portion of the surplus improvement assessments previously programmed for the construction of parkway improvements to the north side of Tierra Rejada Road west of Spring Road. This re- allocation leaves approximately $37,000 for said parkway project. F. Water Costs The projected FY1991/92 year end costs, and proposed FY 1992/93 budget includes a substantial increase in the cost of irrigation water. These figures are based on actual invoices received in recent months. Recent costs have increased dramatically due to the new "tied" water rate structure recently imposed by County Waterworks District No. 1, design to pass through wholesale cost increases imposed by the Metropolitan Water District. In the past year the City has developed and implemented an ambitious water conservation program. As a result water usage was cut in half. In that same period, however, water costs doubled. City staff is now in the process of working with Waterworks District staff to effect a reduction in water rates consistent with district policy to recognize and reward water conservation efforts. If this determination dramatically affects projected costs, the proposed budget and assessment amounts will be reduced accordingly. Assessment District 84 -2 May 20, 1992 G. Annexation 5 The "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972," requires any proposed action to annex areas to an assessment district to be initiated via adoption of an appropriate Resolution. Such a resolution stating the City's intent to annex Home Acres to AD84 -2 is attached as Exhibit "G". H. Public Hearin The "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972," as set forth in the California Streets and Highways Code, requires a public hearing to receive input and to hear any protests to the proposed annexation and the proposed levying of assessments. RECOI*WNDATION Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 92 -850 (Exhibit "G ") declaring the City Council's intention to annex the Home Acres area into Assessment District 84 -2. 2. Adopt Resolution No. 92 -854 (Exhibit "H") and approving the Engineer's Report for AD84 -2 for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1992 and ending June 30, 1993. 3. Adopt Resolution No. 9.2 -853 (Exhibit "I ") declaring the City Council's intention to make certain changes and to order the annual assessments for AD84 -2 for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1992 and ending June 30, 1993; and fixing June 3, 1992, at 7:00 p.m. as the date and time of a public hearing to consider levying said assessments. wp51 \rpt \ad84 -93.ph PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF MOORPARK LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT r- NO. AD -84 -2 May 11, 1992 LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 PREPARED BY: DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES 1470 S. VALLEY VISTA DRIVE SUITE 225 DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Section 1 Authority for Report 1 Section 2 Description of Improvements to be Maintained 1 Section 3 Assessment Roll 3 Section 4 Method of Formula of Cost Spread 3 Section 5 Estimate of Cost 4 Appendix A - Street Lighting Formula — Table 1 Appendix B - Landscape Formula - Table 2 Appendix C - Assessment Summary - Table ,3 Appendix D - Budget Estimate Appendix E - Boundary Map Appendix F - Assessment Roll Appendix G - Resolutions Appendix H - Rebate Procedure h -3 CITY OF MOORPARK Engineer's Report Parks Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 For Fiscal Year 1992 -1993 SECTION 1 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report is prepared pursuant to City Council action taken at their regular meeting of February 5, 1992 to extend this District for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1992 and ending June 30, 1993 in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, "Landscaping Act of 197211, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code. The District will provide electrical energy for public lighting facilities and for operation and maintenance of public lighting within the city. In addition, the District will provide for installation and /or maintenance of public landscaping within the public right -of -way. -- SECTION 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MAINTAINED The City of Moorpark Lighting Maintenance Assessment District is proposed to create a new zone of benefit for the improvement and maintenance of an open space buffer area located at the west end of West Village (Tracts 4340, 4341 and 4342) adjacent to the area known as Home Acres. The District is also proposed to annex the Home Acres, which is located outside the limits of the City of Moorpark, into the new zone. This report covers the period of July 1, 1992 through June 30, 1993. An updated report is prepared each year to reflect updated annual costs and changes in parcelization. The improvements to be maintained in this District include all City -owned and Southern California Edison (S.C.E.) -owned street lights as well as all medians and street trees within public rights -of -way within the boundaries of the city. Lighting maintenance shall include, but is not limited to, energy costs, removal, repair, replacement or relocation of light standards, poles, bulbs, fixtures and all appurtenances. Servicing of S.C.E. owned lights as defined in Section 22538 of the Streets and Highways Code shall be furnished by the Southern California Edison Company or its successors, or this servicing shall be as 1 V+ authorized by the Public Utilities Commission, State of California. Maintenance of City -owned lighting improvements shall be furnished by the City. Landscape maintenance shall include but is not limited to, watering, fertilizing, mowing, weed control, shrubbery, tree removal and pruning, removal and replacement of dead growth, maintenance of irrigation facilities and other necessary work. In addition, the cost to maintain improved areas within an easement will be borne be owners within that project. These easement areas are: 1. Tract No. 2851 Maintenance costs associated with landscaping in the Ventura County Flood Control Easement and portions of the interior tract entry areas. The obligation upon these 73 lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 2. Tract No. 2865 Cost for maintenance of specific landscape areas within the tract, including landscaping at Christian Barrett & Spring Roads; Tierra Rejada landscaping, and Peach dill Road landscaping on east side between Christian Barrett ._, and Tierra Rejada Roads, and the entry monument sign at Christian Barret and Spring Road. The obligation upon y the lots within this tract is pursuant to a condition of development. 3. Tract No. 3032 Maintenance costs associated with landscaping an entry monument at Buttercreek Road and Los Angeles Avenue. This cost to be spread to the 265 lots within the tract. 4. Tract No. 3274 Maintenance costs associated with landscape areas along Williams Ranch Road parkway adjacent to Peach Hill drain channel and Edison entries within PC -3. This cost will be borne by the 220 lots within the tract. 5. Tract Nos. 3019, 3525 Maintenance costs associated with landscaping the Tierra Rejada Road slope and parkway areas and parkway on the west side of Peach Hill Road between Williams Ranch and Tierra Rejada Roads within Tract Nos. 3019 and 3525. The cost is to be spread to the 224 lots within the tracts. 2 6. Tract 3306 Cost for landscape areas within Tract 3306 at the westerly terminus of Inglewood Street. The cost is to be spread to the 22 lots within the tract. 7. Los Angeles Avenue Parkway Maintenance costs associated with landscaping the parkway on the north side of Los Angeles Avenue between Gabbert Road and Shasta Avenue will be borne by all industrial lots northerly of Los Angeles Avenue, southerly of Poindexter Avenue, easterly of Gabbert Road, and westerly of Shasta Avenue. 8. West Village Buffer Area Improvement and maintenance costs associated with the buffer area within Tracts 4340, 4341, 4342, the commercial and multi- family areas bounded by Tierra Rejada to the east, Mountain Trail to the South, Countryhill Road to the west, Tract 4342 to the north and Home Acres. The costs are to be split 50 -50 between the area within the City (Tracts 4340, 4341, 4342 and commercial and multi- family areas) and the Home Acres. SECTION 3 ASSESSMENT ROLL All parcels of real property affected are listed on the "Assessment Roll ", Exhibit A, which will be on file in City Hall with the City Clerk, and is made a part hereof by reference. These parcels are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code which are on file in the office of the Ventura County Assessor in the County Government Center Administration Building, 800 S. Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California and which are also made a part hereof by reference. SECTION 4 ESTIMATE OF COST The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, in Section 22573, states that "The net amount to be assessed upon the lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the new amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits t be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." Lighting The primary benefits of street lighting are for the convenience, safety and protection of people and the security or protection of property, property improvements and goods. The intensity or degree of illumination provided can have a bearing on both. The single family home - Level 1 has been selected as the base unit for the spread of assessments. By definition, the single family home - Level 1 is a single family home located on a street that has existing street lights. A factor of 1.00 has been assigned to the base unit, which is composed of benefit factors which correspond to the following types of benefit. People Use - People related benefits 0.50 Security Benefit - Property protection 0.25 --< Intensity - Degree of illumination 0.25 1.00 Parcels in other land use categories were then rated by comparison with the basic unit. (See Table 1.) People Use - People related benefits 1. Reduction in night accidents and attendant human misery. 2. Reduced vulnerability to criminal assault during hours of darkness. 3. Promotion of business operations during evening hours. 4. Increased safety on roads and highways. Security Benefit - Property Protection 1. Reduction in vandalism and other criminal acts, and damage to improvements. 2. Reduction in burglaries. Intensity Intensity or degree of illumination provided on streets varies with type of street, date of installation and the use of the property adjacent thereto. Landscaping The landscaping element of the spread formula recognizes that all properties within the City benefit from the maintenance of the landscaping within public rights -of -way and easements. These benefits include aesthetic enjoyment, creation of a placement living and working environment, an increase in general property values, improved safety resulting from a regular tree trimming program and improved street sweeping capabilities resulting from trimming trees which may otherwise interface with street sweeping operations. Because of the general benefit received, the cost is spread equally along each parcel in the City. This amount is shown in the appendix. Rebate The City Council approved a rebate procedure for disadvantaged property owners. The procedure shall be followed as described in Appendix G. SECTION 5: COST ESTIMATE The estimated costs of operating the District are shown Appendix "D" of this Report. 4 The costs attributed to landscaping and the costs attributed to A_� lighting will be separately appointed, according to the formula, and added together to constitute the total assessment for each parcel. Conclusion In conclusion, it is our opinion that the assessments within Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -84 -2 are apportioned by a formula that fairly distributes the net cost in accordance with the benefits that are received. 5 APPENDIX APPENDIX "A" A,q CITY OF MOORPARK Lighting Maintenance Assessment District AD -84 -2 Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972 Table 1 Street Lighting Formula Use People Lighting Total Annual Code Description Use Intensity Security Units Assessment 0 Residential Vacant 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 $6.12 1 Single Family - Level 1 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $24.46 Mobile Home 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 .2. 3 Condo (Per Unit) 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $24.46 4 Residential Income (2 -4 Units) 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $24.46 (Per Unit) 5 Apartments (5 +) 0.50 0.05 0.20 0.75 $18.35 6 Per Unit Single Family- 0.50 0.05 0.20 0.75 $18.35 9 Level 2 Mobile Home & 0.50 0.05 0.20 0.75 $18.35 Trailer Park (Per Space) 10 Commercial Vacant 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 $6.12 Land 11 Retail Stores, 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $97.84 Single Story (Per Parcel) 12 Store & Office 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $97.84 Combination 15 Shopping Centers 4.00 1.00 1.50 6.50 $158.99 (Neighborhood) 16 Shopping Centers 4.00 1.00 1.50 6.50 $158.99 (Regional) 17 Office Building 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 $73.38 (1 Story) 18 Office Building 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $97.84 (Multi- Story) (Per Parcel) 19 Retail Stores 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $97.84 (Multi- Story) (Per Parcel) 21 Restaurants & 3.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 $122.30 Cocktail Lounges 24 Banks, Savings & 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 $73.38 Loans 25 Service Stations 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $97.84 26 Auto Sales, Repair 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $97.84 Storage, Rental A -�J X30 Industrial land 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 $6.12 Vacant 31 Light Manufacturing 3.00 1.00 1.00 °5.00 $122.30 32 Warehousing 2.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 $97.84 33 Industrial Condos, 2.00 1.50 1.50 5.00 $122.30 Co -Ops, PUD's 38 Mineral Processing 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 $73.38 44 Truck Crops 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $24.46 46 Pasture (Permanent) 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $24.46 48 Poultry 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $24.46 49 Flowers, Seed Products 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $24.46 51 Orchards 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $24.46 53 Field Crops, Dry 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $24.46 54 Pasture of Graze, Dry 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $24.46 55 Feed Lots 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $24.46 57 Tree Farms 0.50 0.25 0.25 1.00 $24.46 61 Theater 3.00 1.00 1.00 5.00 $122.30 69 Parks 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 7.0. Institutional Vacant 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 $6.12 71 Churches, Convent Rectory 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 $6.12 72 Schools 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 73 Colleges 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 78 Public Bldgs., 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 Museums, Firehouses, ,.c Etc. 79 Flood Control 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 80 Misc. Vacant Lots 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 $6.12 81 Utility Water Company 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 83 Petroleum & Gas 1.00 0.50 0.50 2.00 $48.92 86 Water Rights, Pumps 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 88 Highways & Streets 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 91 Utility- Edison 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 92 Telephone 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 93 S.P.R.R. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 94 Undedicated Community Areas (Condos) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 95 State Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 96 County Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 97 City Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 99 Exempt 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 APPENDIX "B" A - I CITY OF MOORPARK Lighting Maintenance Assessment District Number AD -84 -2 Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972 Landscape Formula The landscaping element of the spread formula is calculated in accordance with the method described as follows: Total Annual Cost = $7.85 per parcel Notes: 1. In addition to the above landscape charge, 73 lots within Tract No. 2851 are assessed an additional landscape cost for a Ventura County Flood Control Easement and portions of the interior tract entry areas. The additional cost per lot is $65.41. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 2. In addition to the above landscape charge, 622 lots within Tract 2865 are assessed an additional landscape charge for the maintenance of parkways, Tierra Rejada Road slope and street scape areas, and the monument sign within the tract. The additional cost per lot is $102.51. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 3. In addition to the above landscape charge, 265 lots within Tract No. 3032 are assessed an additional landscape charge for the maintenance of an entry monument at Buttercreek Road and Los Angeles Avenue. The additional cost per lot is $5.07. 4. In addition to the above landscape charge, 129 lots within Tract No. 3274 are assessed an additional landscape charge for the landscape for the maintenance of parkway areas along Williams Ranch Road and Edison entries within PC -3. The additional cost per lot is $12.98. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 5. In addition to the above landscape charge, 224 lots within Tract Nos. 3019 and 3525 are assessed an additional landscaping charge for maintenance of Tierra Rejada Road slope and parkways and the parkway on the west side of Peach Hill Road between Williams Ranch and Tierra Rejada Roads. The additional cost per lot is $242.58. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 6. In addition to the above landscape charge, 22 lots within Tract No. 3306 are assessed an additional landscape charge for the maintenance of landscape area at the westerly terminus of Inglewood Street. The additional cost per lot is $8.41. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. A , ,2 7. In addition to the above landscape charge, 91 lots northerly of Los Angeles Avenue southerly of Poindexter Avenue, between Gabbert and Shasta Avenues are assessed an additional landscaping charge for maintenance of the northside of Los Angeles Avenue Parkway. The additional cost per lot is $30.00. 8. In addition to the above landscape charge, 525 lots within Tract Nos. 4340, 4341 and 4342 are assessed an additional 20.00 per lot, the commercial and multi - family parcels are assessed an additional $0 per parcel, for the improvement and maintenance of West Village Buffer Area. The Home Acres, not to be levied for any City -wide lighting and landscape charges, are to be assessed for $50.24 per lot for the improvement and maintenance of West Village Buffer Area. A, t3 APPENDIX "C" CITY OF MOORPARK Lighting Maintenance Assessment District AD -84 -2 Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972 Table 3 Assessment Summary Use Landscape Lighting Total Code Description Assessment Assessment Assessment 0 Residential $7.85 $6.12 $13.97 Vacant 1 Single Family- Level 1 7.85 24.46 32.31 2 Mobile Home 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 Condo 7.85 24.46 32.31 Per Unit 4 Residential Income (2 -4 Units 7.85 24.46 32.31 Per Unit 5 Apartments (5 +) 7.85 18.35 26.20 Per Unit 6 Single Family - Level 2 7.85 18.35 26.20 ,•c 9 Mobile Home and 7.85 18.35 26.20 Per Space Trailer park 10 Commercial Vacant 7.85 6.12 13.97 Land 11 Retail Stores, 7.85 97.84 105.69 Single Story 12 Store & Office 7.85 97.84 105.69 Per Parcel Combination 15 Shopping Centers 7.85 158.99 166.84 (Neighborhood) 16 Shopping Centers 7.85� 158.99 166.84 (Regional) 17 Office Building 7.85 73.88 81.23 (1- Story) 18 Office Building 7.85 97.84 105.69 Per Parcel (Multi- Story) 19 Retail Stores 7.85 97.84 105.69 Per Parcel (Multi -Story 21 Restaurants & 7.85 122.30 130.15 Cocktail Lounges 24 Banks, Savings & Loans 7.85 73.88 81.23 25 Service Stations 7.85 97.84 105.69 26 Auto Sales, Repair 7.85 97.84 105.69 Storage, Rental Use Landscape Lighting Total Code Description Assessment Assessment Assessment 30 Industrial Land 7.85 6.12 13.97 Vacant 31 Light Manufacturing 7.85 122.30 130.15 32 Warehousing 7.85 97.84 105.69 33 Industrial Condos, Co -Ops, PUD's 7.85 122.30 130.15 38 Mineral Processing 7.85 73.88 81.23 44 Truck Crops 7.85 24.46 32.31 46 Pasture (Permanent) 7.85 24.46 32.31 48 Poultry 7.85 24.46 32.31 49 Flowers, Seed 7.85 24.46 32.31 Production 51 Orchards 7.85 24.46 32.31 53 Field Crops, Dry 7.85 24.46 32.31 54 Pasture of Graze, 7.85 24.46 32.31 Dry 55 Feed Lots 7.85 24.46 32.31 57. Tree Farms 7.85 24.46 32.31 61 Theater 7.85 122.30 130.15 69 Parks 0.00 0.00 0.00 70 Institutional 7.85 6.12 13.97 Vacant Land 71 Churches, Convent, 7.85 6.12 13.97 Rectory 72 Schools 0.00 0.00 0.00 73 Colleges 0.00 0.00 0.00 78 Public Bldgs., Museums, Firehouses, Etc. 0.00 0.00 0.00 79 Flood Control 0.00 0.00 0.00 80 Misc. Vacant Land 7.85 6.12 13.97 81 Utility Water Co. 0.00 0.00 0.00 83 Petroleum & Gas 7.85 48.92 56.77 86 Water Rights, Pumps 0.00 0.00 0.00 88 Highways & Streets 0.00 0.00 0.00 91 Utility - Edison 0.00 0.00 0.00 92 Telephone 0.00 0.00 0.00 93 S.P.R.R. 0.00 0.00 0.00 94 Undedicated Community Areas (Condos) 0.00 0.00 0.00 95 State Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 96 County Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 97 City Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 99 Exempt 0.00 0.00 0.00 Actual assessment amounts may vary due to discrepancies between use codes and actual property uses. APPENDIX D CITY OF MOORPARK LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AD -84 -2 BUDGET ESTIMATE FY 1991/92 STREET LIGHTING ZONES OF BENEFIT 1. Tract No. 2851 Interior Parkway & Flood Control Channel 2. Tract No. 2865 Pacifica & Pardee 3. Tract No. 3032 .. Buttercreek & Peppermill 4. Tract No. 3274 Williams Ranch Road 5. Tract No. 3019, 3025 Warmington .� 6. Tract No. 3306 Glenhaven (Inglewood) 7. Los Angeles Avenue North Side Parkway 8. West Village Buffer Area $230,000.00 4,775.00 63,760.00 1,344.00 1,675.00 54,337.00 J 185.00 2,730.00 21,000.00 SUBTOTAL $149,806.00 A - ks CITY WIDE 1. Tract 2891: Campus Park & Collins $ 3,980.00 2. Tract 4170: Campus Park Median 1,550.00 3. Campus Park Median (Marq. to Jul) 6,583.00 4. Parkways: Princeton 4,620.00 5. Community Center Parkway 1,050.00 6. S/E Corner Spring Rd. & Peach Hill 1,310.00 7. S/W Corner Spring Rd. & Peach Hill 1,430.00 8. Parkway: E/S Peach Hill N/O Park 1,310.00 9. Tierra Rejada (N /O Harvester) 2,700.00 10. Tierra Rejada Medians (Harvester to Bridge) 740.00 11. Tierra Rejada Medians (Edsn Esmnt to Peach Hill) 6,480.00 12. Tierra Rejada Medians (Peach Hill to W/O Spring) 15,208.00 13. Pepper Tree Spraying 4,000.00 ,.� 14. Tree Removal /Replacement 12,000.00 15. Tree Trimming 15,000.00 16. Weed Abatement 5,000.00 17. Misc. Improvements 206,455.00 ADMINISTRATION FY 91/92 Carryover GRAND TOTAL: $289,416.00 $10,346.00 (241,643.00) $437,925.00 A - i% APPENDIX "E" BOUNDARY MAP h R fir � •`� . °� :�� Lim I� ' n • \� � ��. " :,;i� ..,r :� ��,rmill �- 11 -. �� I A,tl APPENDIX "F" Appendix "F ", the Assessment Roll, shows the assessment upon each lot or �. parcel (approximately 8191 parcels) within this District and is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and County Assessor. The Ventura County Assessor's office no longer lists public utility easements on the Assessor's Roll. rpt \028engad.dc APPENDIX "G" RESOLUTIONS A APPENDIX "H" REBATE PROCEDURE 4.21 r EXHIBIT "B" AD 84 -2 05/01/92 Fund 23 Activity FY 1991/92 FY 1992/93 FY FY --------------- - - - - -- Proposed Description -------------------------- - - - - -- -------------------------------- 1989/90 --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- 1990 /91 --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Budget --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Proj Actual ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- Budget Notes: ---- - - - - -- -------------------- ---- - - - - -- --------------- - - - -- BEGINNING BALANCE 234,410 288,631 267,825 264,890 287,085 REVENUE 352,236 379,704 324,408 337,319 436,925 Less Refunds (22,100) Plus Developer Fees 6,964 Plus Misc. (3,181) 5,070 Plus Fund Transfer 4,999 7,153 --- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- Total Revenue --- - - - - -- 331,954 398,891 337,319 AVAILABLE FUNDS --- - - - - -- 566,364 --- - - - - -- 687,522 --- - - - - -- 592,233 ---- - - - - -- 602,209 ---- - - - - -- 724,010 EXPENSES Personnel 16,166 17,171 17,602 17,602 0 &M ZONES OF BEBEFIT 74,627 97,433 148,806 CITY WIDE BEBEFIT Professional Services Assessment Engineering 3,161 7,000 Water Conservation 6,000 Contract Maintenance 84,801 Maintenance Areas 35,323 45,295 32,581 Miscellaneous Maintenance 34,000 5,000 36,000 Utilities 239,244 Street Lighting Energy 200,000 213,048 230,000 Irrigation Water 11,320 13,789 9,450 Irrigation Energy 4,840 740 1,380 Other Misc Expenses 3,114 --- - - - - -- 3,268 --- - - - - -- 8,650 ---- - - - - -- (16,706) ---- - - - - -- 0 & M Sub -Total 330,320 363,378 286,522 454,511 Capital Improvements 76,601 217,455 11,000 206,455 Less TOTAL EXPENSES --- - - - - -- 277,733 --- - - - - -- 423,087 --- - - - - -- 598,004 ---- - - - - -- 315,124 ---- - - - - -- 678,568 Transfer from Gann Fund 455 YEAR END BALANCE 288,631 264,890 (5,771) 287,085 45,442 r EXHIBIT "C" Department 143 Budget Summary Code Description - - - -- ---------------- - - - - -- SALARIES & BENEFITS MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS 623 Supplies 624 Postage 626 Printing 637 Travel & Milage 641 Professional Services L/S Design Assmnt Engineering Water Conservation 641 Total 642 Contractual Services Zone Maintenance City Wide Maint. Areas Miscellaneous Maint. 642 Total 652 Utilities Street Lights L/S Power L/S Water 652 Total 654 Vehicle Maint 655 Fuel 658 Maint & Repair 661 Equip Rental M &O Total 903 Capital Projects ------------------------------- FY 91/92 05/01/92 Estimated Actual FY 92/93 BUDGET FY 89/90 FY 90/91 -------------- - - - - -- ----------------- - - - - -- ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET Detail Total Detail Total 6,516 16,166 17,171 -- 15,360 -- 17,602 933 509 2,000 -- 1,890 -- 2,000 971 217 2,100 -- 2,080 -- 2,100 307 321 0 -- 0 -- 0 0 233 200 -- 230 -- 200 20,000 10,000 7,000 6,000 5,485 3,161 16,978 10,000 33,000 97,433 57,260 45,295 32,581 5,000 36,000 59,720 84,801 98,100 147,728 125,841 215,000 230,000 2,090 2,790 56,690 51,880 1941677 2391244 239,300 273,780 284,670 150 0 1,000 -- 1,300 -- 2,500 629 1,609 1,200 -- 1,250 -- 1,200 1,352 225 2,500 -- 1,900 -- 2,000 837 --- - - - - -- 0 --- - - - - -- 0 --- - - - - -- -- --- 0 - - - - -- -- ----- 1,000 - - - - -- 265,061 330,320 363,378 440,158 454,511 6,156 76,601 217,455 11,000 206,455 277,733 423,087 598,004 466,518 678,568 ---- EXHIBIT "D" (1 of 4) SUMMARY of FY 1991/92 Projected Actual Expenses FY1991/92 No. Description Budget - -- ---------------------------- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ZONES OF BENEFIT 05/01/92 FY1991/92 Anticipated Year End Expenses ------------------------------------------------------------- Manintenance Costs Utility Costs ---------------------- - - - - -- ------------ - - - - -- Total Carry Contract Rplcmnt Total Water Electr. Cost Over 1 Tract 2851 6,773 3,250 200 3,450 1,808 240 5,498 2 Tract 2865 32,419 24,520 400 24,920 21,159 700 46,779 3 Tract 3032 21978 1,560 300 1,860 192 0 2,052 4 T3274 Williams Ranch Rd 51930 3,090 0 3,090 255 140 3,485 5 Tracts 3019/3025 241355 19,100 200 19,300 19,412 130 38,842 6 *'T3306 Glenhaven 1,452 562 0 562 75 140 777 7 L A Ave Parkway 720 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Buffer Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Peach Hill Wash Linear Park 0 --- - - - - -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-Total Zones of Benefit 74,627 -- - - - - -- 52,082 -- - - - - -- 1,100 -- - - - - -- 53,182 -- - - - - -- 42,901 -- - - - - -- 1,350 ---- - - - - -- 97,433 CITY WIDE BENEFIT --------------- -- Maintenance Areas (1-17) 51,483 29,366 1,400 30,766 13,789 740 45,295 Miscellaneous Maintenance 34,000 -- -- -- -- -- 5,000 Miscellaneous Improvements 217,455 -- -- -- -- -- 11,000 Sub -Total City Wide Benefit --- - - - - -- 302,938 -- - - - - -- 29,366 -- - - - - -- 1,400 -- - - - - -- 30,766 -- - - - - -- 13,789 -- - - - - -- 740 ---- - - - - -- 61,295 GRAND TOTAL 377,565 81,448 2,500 83,948 56,00 2,090 158,728 1,275 (14,360) 926 2,445 (14,487) 675 720 0 0 (22,806) 6,188 29,000 35,188 --� EXHIBIT "D" (2 of 4) Fiscal Year 1991 /92 Projected Actual Expenses ZONES OF BENEFIT -- COST DETAIL 05/01/92 FY1991/92 Anticipated Year End Expenses ------------------------------------------------------------- Hanintenance Costs Utility Costs FY1991/92 - --- --------- ------- -- - - - - -- ---------- -- - - - - -- Total Carry No. Description Budget Contract Rplcmnt Total Water Electr. Cost Over - -- ---------------------------- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- --- ---------------------------- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- ZONES OF BENEFIT. -- COST DETAIL ------------------------------ 1 T2851: Bambi /Benwood /Pecan 5,783 3,250 200 3,450 1,808 240 5,498 285 Flood Control Channel 990 0 0 0 990 6,773 2 ' 'T2865: S/S T. R. Slope /Prkwy (Pacifica) S/S T. R. Slope /Prkwy (Pardee) N/S T. R. Prkway (Pardee) HIS T. R. E/0 Sthmptn Planter N/S T. R. Prkwy (Pacifica) Christian Barrett & Spring Peach Hill (East Side) 3 T 3032: Buttercreek Entry Peppermill Prkwy 4 T3274 Williams Ranch Rd HIS & S/S Prkwyy Landscape Barrier 5 T 3019/T3025 T. R. Slc(;e /Streetscape N/S T. R. Parkway Peach Hill - W/S 6 T3306: Inglewood (Glenhaven) 7 Parkway N/S L. A. Ave E/0 Gabbert 8 West Village Buffer Park 9 Peach Hill Wash Linear Park 6,944 6,944 2,720 9,230 0 2,820 3,761 32,419 1,569 1,409 2,978 5,130 800 5,930 12,490 10,125 1,740 24,355 1,452 720 0 0 3,250 200 3,450 0 0 0 > 24520 400 24,920 0 0 0 24,520 400 24,920 1,560 300 1,860 0 1,560 300 1,860 3090 3,090 0 3,090 0 3,090 0 > 19,100 200 19,300 0 19,100 200 19,300 562 562 0 0 0 Sub -Total Zones of Benefit 74,627 52,082 1,100 53,182 1,808 240 11,682 700 0 0 0 7,260 1,747 470 21,159 700 87 0 105 0 192 0 255 140 255 140 11,682 130 7,260 470 19,412 130 75 140 -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- 42,901 1,350 5,498 12,382 0 0 24,920 7,260 1,747 470 46,779 1,947 105 2,052 3,485 0 3,485 11,812 26,560 470 38,842 777 0 0I 0 97,433 1,275 (5,438) 6,944 2,720 (15,690) (7,260) 1,073 3,291 (14,360) (378) 1,304 926 1,645 800 2,445 678 (16,435) 1,270 (14,487) 675 720 0 0 (22,806) .-+ EXHIBIT "D" (3 of 4 ) iscal Year 1991 /92 Projected Actual Expenses CITY WIDE BENEFIT -- COST DETAIL No. Description - -- ---------------------------------- A. Maintenance Areas -------------------- 1 Tract 2851: Campus Park & Collins Pkwy: W/S Collins N/0 C. P. Pkwy: N/S Cmp Prk W/0 Collins C. P. Median: Collins to Pecan 2 Tract 4170: Campus Park Median Princeton to Julliard 3 Campus Park Med. (Marq. to Julyd) 4 Parkways: Both sides of Princeton (6 mos.) 5 Medians: Princeton (6 Mos.) 6 Parkways: Poindexter / Sierra (6 mos.) 7 Community Center Parkway 8 S/W Corner Spring Rd & Peach Hill 9 Parkway: E/S Peach Hill N/O Park 10 Parkway: Pch Hill E/0 Mesa Verde 11 T. R. Medians (N /0 Harvester) 12 T. R. Med. (Harvester to Bridge) 13 T. R. Med. (Bridge to Mt. Meadow) 14 T. R. Med (Mt. Mdw. to Ed. Esmnt) 15 T. R. Med (Ed. Esmnt to Pch Hill) 16 T. R. Med (Pch Hill to Spring) 17 T. R. Ned (W /0 Spring to Spring) 05/01/92 FY1991/92 Anticipated Year End Expenses ------------------------------------------------------------- Manintenance Costs Utility Costs FY1991/92 ---------------------- - - - - -- ------------ - - - - -- Total Carry Budget Contract Rplcmnt Total Water Electr. Cost Over 5,456 2,154 6,885 4,776 4,763 1,371 1,156 1,609 3,840 0 3,213 990 0 0 5,590 9,680 0 3,530 909 4,543 0 0 0 0 909 2,621 0 1,986 540 0 0 3,720 10,608 200 3,730 100 1,009 100 4,643 0 0 0 0 100 1,009 200 2,821 0 200 2,186 540 0 0 200 3,920 300 10,908 0 Sub -Total Maintenance Areas I 51,483 II 29,366 1,400 30,766 170 240 130 1,032 130 200 215 470 0 668 0 0 0 7,260 3,704 130 80 60 40 13,789 740 ' 3,900 1,379 5,805 0 0 0 200 1,224 3,291 I 0 2,984 620 0 0 11,240 14,652 0 0 45,295 EXHIBIT "D" (4 of 4) Fiscal Year 1991 /92 Projected Actual Expenses 05/01/92 CITY WIDE BENEFIT -- COST DETAIL PY1991/92 ---------------------------------- Projected Carry No. - -- --- Description --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- - - - - -- Budget -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- Expenses ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- Over ----- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- B. Miscellaneous Maintenance -------------------------- 1 Pepper Tree Spraying 4,000 1,500 2,500 2 Tree Removal / Replacement 12,000 11500 10,500 3 Tree Trimming 15,000 1,000 14,000 4 Weed Abatement 3,000 1,000 2,000 'Sub -Total Misc. Maintenance 34,000 5,000 29,000 TOTAL CITYWIDE MAINTENANCE CARRY OVERS (Sec. A & B) ...................... ............................... 35,188 C. Miscellaneous Improvements ------------------------ - - - - -- Funding Source --------------------------------------------------- Prior Pr Yrs Surplus PY1991/92 Years' Haint. T. R. Rd ---------------------------------- FY1991/92 Carry Assmnt Developer Improv Carry No. Description Assmnts Overs Surplus Deposits Assmnt Budget Expended Over 1 Prkwy: Shasta /Los Angeles Ave 0 8,017 1,983 10,000 1,000 9,000 2 Prkwy: Princeton 0 15,000 15,000 15,000 3 Prkwy: E/S Pch Hill S/0 Mesa Verde 0 7,145 7,855 15,000 1,000 14,000 4 Prkwy: Poindexter E/O & W/O Sierra 0 8,500 17,000 25,500 1,000 24,500 5 Prkwy: S/S L. A. E/0 Tierra Rejada 0 10,162 7,153 17,315 17,315 6 Prkwy: Pch Hill E/0 Mesa Verde 0 20,000 20,000 1,000 19,000 7 Prkwy: S/S Cmps Prk E/O Princeton 0 14,000 14,000 14,000 8 Prkwy: N/S & S/S C. P. W/O Prncton 0 0 0 9 Prkwy Hod: T. R. S/0 L. A. Ave 0 5,000 5,000 5,000 0 10 Prkwy Hod: W/S Sprng S/0 Pch Hill 0 1,000 1,000 1,000 11 Prkwy: E/S Sprng S/0 Pch Hill 0 1,000 1,000 1,000 0 12 Median: Princeton 0 19,000 19,000 19,000 13 High Street Landscaping 0 20,000 20,000 1,000 19,000 14 Prkwy: N/S T. R. Pch Hill to Sprng 0 54,640 -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- 54,640 -- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- 54,640 ----- Sub -Total Misc. Improvements --- - - - - -- 0 -- - - - - -- 381662 -- - - - - -- 1001000 24,153 54,640 2171455 11,000 - - - - -- 206,455 EXHIBIT "E" (1 of 4) Landscape Maintenance Costs Projection Fiscal Year 1992/93 No. Description - -- --------------------------- - - - - -- ZONES OF BENEFIT 05/01/92 FY 1992/93 Recommended Budget --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Maintenance Costs Utility Costs LESS ------------ ------ ------------ - - - - -- SUB- FY 1991/92 Contract Replcmnt Water Electr. TOTAL Carry Over TOTAL 1 Tract 2851: Benwood /Bambi /Pecan 3,500 500 1,800 250 2 Tract 2865: Pacifica /Pardee 26,000 2,000 20,600 800 3 Tract 3032: Buttercreek / Peppermill 1,580 500 190 0 4 Tract 3274: Williams Ranch Rd 3,200 500 260 160 5 Tract 3019 & Tract 3025 19,200 1,000 19,500 150 6 Tract 3306: Glenhaven (Inglewood) 580 200 80 0 7 N/S Los Angeles Ave [West] Parkways 3,200 200 0 50 8- 'West Village Buffer Area 0 0 0 0 9 Peach Hill Drain Linear Park 0 0 0 0 SUB -TOTAL ZONES OF BENEFIT 57,260 4,900 42,430 1,410 CITY WIDE BENEFIT ------------------- No. Description - -- --------------------------------- City Wide Benefit -------- ---------- A. Maintenance Areas (1 -17) B. Miscellaneous Maintenance C. Miscellaneous Improvements SUB -TOTAL CITYWIDE BENEFIT GRAND TOTAL 6,050 1,275 4,775 49,400 (14,360) 63,760 2,270 926 1,344 4,120 2,445 1,675 39,850 (14,487) 54,337 860 675 185 3,450 720 2,730 20,000 0 20,000 0 0 0 126,000 (22,806) I 148,806 Maintenance Costs Utility Costs ------------- - - - - -- --------------- - -- Contract Replcmnt Water Electr. TOTAL Remarks 32581 3550 9450 1380 36000 -- -- -- --- - - - - -- 68,581 -- - - - - -- 3,550 -- - - - - -- 9,450 -- - - - - -- 1,380 --- - - - - -- 125,841 -- - - - - -- 8,450 -- - - - - -- 51,880 -- - - - - -- 21790 46,961 36,000 206,455 289,416 415,416 �-- - EXHIBIT "E" (2 of 4) Landscape Maintenance Costs Projection Fiscal Year 1991/92 No. Description --- --------------------------------- ZONES OF BENEFIT -- COST DETAIL ------------------------------------- ------------------------ 1 Tract 2851: Bambi /Benwood /Pecan Flood Control Channel 2 Tract 2865: S/S T. R. Slope /Streeet (Pacifica) S/S T. R. Slope /Streeet (Pardee) N/S T. R. Parkway (Pardee) - N/S T. R. E/0 Southampton Planter N/S T. R. Parkway (Pacifica) Christian Barrett & Spring E/S Peach Hill Prkwy (C. B. to T. R.) 3 Tract 3032: 4 Buttercreek Entry ` S/E Peppermill Parkway 4 Tract 3274: Williams Ranch Rd HIS Parkway S/S Parkway Landscape Barrier 5 Tract 3019 & Tract 3025: Warmington W/S Peach Hill Rd (Wm Rnch to T. R.) S/S T. R. Slope /Streeet N/S T. R. Parkway 6 Tract 3306: Glenhaven (Inglewood) 7 Parkway HIS L.A. Ave E/0 Gabbert 8 West Village Buffer 8 Peach Hill Wash Linear Park Sub -Total Zones of Benefit FY 1992/93 Recommended Budget ----------------------------------------------------- Maintenance Costs Utility Costs ------------- - - - - -- --------------- - -- Contract Replcmnt Water Electr. TOTAL Remarks --- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ------------------------- --------- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ------------------- - - - - -- 3,500 500 1,800 250 3,500 500 1,800 250 11,000 800 26,000 2,000 7,300 1,800 500 --- - - - - -- 26,000 -- - - - - -- 2,000 -- - - - - -- 20,600 -- - - - - -- 800 1,580 500 90 100 --- - - - - -- 1,580 -- - - - - -- 500 -- - - - - -- 190 -- - - - - -- 0 160 3,200 500 260 --- - - - - -- 3,200 -- - - - - -- 500 -- - - - - -- 260 -- - - - - -- 160 11,000 150 19,200 1,000 8,000 500 - --- - - - - -- 19,200 -- - - - - -- 1,000 -- - - - - -- 19,500 -- - - - -- 150 580 200 80 0 3,200 200 I 50 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57,260 4,900 42,430 1,410 6,050 0 6,050 11,800 0 0 28,000 7,300 1,800 500 49,400 2,170 100 2,270 160 3,960 0 4,120 11,150 28,200 500 39,850 860 3,450 20,000 0 126,000 Electrical Costs paid by Performance Nursery Design costs ; �),,; EXHIBIT "E" (3 of 4) Landscape Maintenance Costs Projection Fiscal Year 1992/93 No. Description A. Maintenance Areas -------------------- 1 Tract 2851: Campus Park & Collins Pkwy: W/S Collins N/0 C. P. Pkwy: N/S Cmp Prk W10 Collins C. P. Median: Collins to Pecan 2 Tract 4170: Campus Park Median Princeton to Julliard 3 Campus Park Med. (Marq. to Julyd) 4 Parkways: Both sides of Princeton 5 Medians: Princeton 6 Parkways: Poindexter / Sierra �-r 7 Community Center Parkway 8 S/E Corner Spring Rd & Peach Hill 9 S/W Corner Spring Rd & Peach Hill 10 Parkway: E/S Peach Hill N/0 Park 11 Parkway: Pch Hill E/0 Mesa Verde 12 T. R. Medians (N /O Harvester) 13 T. R. Ned. (Harvester to Bridge) 14 T. R. Med. (Bridge to Mt. Meadow) 15 T. R. Med (Mt. Mdw. to Ed. Esmnt) 16 T. R. Med (Ed. Esmnt to Pch Hill) 17 T. R. Med (Pch Hill to Spring) 18 T. R. Med (W /0 Spring to spring) FY 1992/93 Recommended Budget ----------------------------------------------------- Maintenance Costs Utility Costs ------------- - - - - -- - --------------- - -- Contract Replcmnt Water Electr. TOTAL Remarks 3,500 300 180 910 100 400 140 4,543 400 1,500 140 3,000 200 1,300 120 800 20 150 80 1000 30 200 80 900 30 400 100 1,000 30 200 80 2,000 300 300 600 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,720 600 2,000 10,608 1,500 3,000 0 0 0 100 100 160 100 3,980 1,550 6,583 4,620 Three months 1,050 1,310 1,430 1,310 2,700 740 6,480 15,208 --- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Sub -Total Maintenance Areas 32,581 31550 9,450 1,380 46,961 --c EXHIBIT "E" (4 of 4) Landscape Maintenance Costs Projection Fiscal Year 1992/93 No. Description Budget Remarks B. Miscellaneous Maintenance -------------------------- 1 Pepper Tree Spraying 4,000 2 Tree Removal / Replacement 12,000 3 Tree Trimming 15,000 4 Weed Abatement 5,000 Sub -Total Misc. Maintenance 36,000 ---------------- Total LESS C. Miscellaneous Improvements Proposed Less ---------------- - - - - -- emu, ------------------------ - - - - -- DYniatl+ DYIAV R�lennn mn+el r -4--- nv M inn ,.,.... .... No. Description Estimate Expenses Expenses Budget Transfer Over ASSESSMENT 1 Prkwy: Shasta /Los Angeles Ave 19,500 1,000 18,500 18,500 9,500 9,000 0 2 Prkwy: Princeton 20,000 0 20,000 10,000 (5,000) 15,000 0 3 Prkwy: EIS Pch Hill S/O Mesa Verde 25,000 1,000 24,000 25,000 11,000 14,000 0 4 Prkwy: Poindexter E/0 & W10 Sierra 20,000 1,000 19,000 19,000 (5,500) 24,500 0 5 Prkwy: S/S L. A. E/0 Tierra Rejada 17,315 0 17,315 17,315 17,315 0 6 Prkwy: Pch Hill E/0 Mesa Verde 25,000 1,000 24,000 19,000 19,000 0 7 Prkwy: S/S Cmps Prk E/O Princeton 30,000 0 30,000 0 (14,000) 14,000 0 8 Prkwy: N/S & S/S C. P. W/O Prncton 20,000 0 20,000 0 0 0 9 Prkwy Mod: T. R. S/0 L. A. Ave 20,000 5,000 15,000 5,000 5,000 0 0 10 Prkwy Mod: W/S Spring S/0 Pch Hill 5,000 0 5,000 5,000 4,000 1,000 0 11 Prkwy: E/S Spring S/O Pch Hill 25,000 1,000 24,000 14,000 14,000 0 0 12 Median: Princeton 30,000 0 30,000 0 (19,000) 19,000 0 13 High Street Landscaping 20,000 1,000 19,000 19,000 19,000 0 14 Prkwy: HIS T. R. Pch Hill to Sprng 37,640 0 37,640 37,640 (17,000) 54,640 0 15 Sunnyslope Basin (ZONE 2) 9,000 0 9,000 9,000 9,000 16 Repair Slope (ZONE 2) 8,000 0 8,000 8,000 8,000 Sub -Total Misc. Improvements 331,455 11,000 320,455 1206,455 1 0 206,455 1 0 ^ EXHIBIT F Street Light --------------------------- Cost Analysis FY 1990/91 Summary ------------------------------------------------ Street Traffic Signal Date Lights Safety Lighting 03/04/92 318.18 14,704.21 15,022.39 2,024.94 02/05/92 346.27 15,300.13 15,646.40 2,450.02 01/15/92 346.27 15,562.23 15,908.50 2,085.48 '-` 12/04/91 346.27 15,033.52 15,379.79 2,143.71 11/06/91 346.27 15,026.85 15,373.12 2,082.24 10/02/91 346.27 15,095.34 15,441.61 2,965.87 Six Month Tot 92,771.81 13,752.26 12 Ho. Est. 185,543.62 27,504.52 Total 213,048.14 Say ..................... 215000 05/01/92 FY 1991 /92 Estimate ----------------------------------------------------------------- Description Per No Per Yr Total 1. Street Lights 15,600.00 187,200.00 2. Safety Lights 2500 30,000.00 217,200.00 Plus Estimated Cost for new lights ...... ............................... 3,000.00 Contingency for unanticipated rate . ............................... 12,000 232,200.00 Say ....................... 230,000.00