The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAGENDA REPORT 1992 0603 CC REG ITEM 08F 2 °ol/4(,) 414 • ITEM ` F 4 e rr � F MOORPARK tiO 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529-6864 9 / Oq co iORPARK, CALIFORNIA Ci ry Council Meot;ng MEMORANDUM of 6 �? 1992 ACTION: a, tt_ TO: HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL AL 9 ALL& ,41,--) FROM: DIRK LOVETT, ASST. CITY ENGINEER DATE: MAY 28, 1992 V\ SUBJECT: REVISED PAD ELEVATIONS AND BUILDING ENVELOPES ON VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP #4620 (JBH) BACK GROUND The City Council approved tentative map 4620 on January 9, 1991. Pad elevations and building envelopes were discussed and approved to both facilitate development and minimize grading on slopes of 20% or more. During final design the applicant's engineer has determined that certain adjustments are desired and/or necessary to facilitate and improve the pads. These changes require City Council approval since some pad elevations will change by more than two feet. ANALYSIS Building envelopes have been modified to provide the maximum use of each lot. Lots in which the envelopes have been enlarged, or in which there are to be two envelopes, will utilize the majority of level areas without extending excessively into the slope areas. Elevation changes are as follow (see exhibit A) : 28 lots have changed pad elevations that have changed from as little as 3 feet to as much as 31 feet. These elevation changes are due in most part to moving the pads across the lots to more desirable locations, not necessarily by increasing cut or fill. 5 lots will not be graded at this time. Topography of these lots is fairly flat and house architecture can fit into the natural slopes. Minor grading for slabs and foundations in the shown envelopes can accommodate custom designed homes. 33 lots will essentially maintain the previously proposed elevations. PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. BERNARDO M. PEREZ SCOTT MONTGOMERY ROY E. TALLEY JR. JOHN E. WOZNIAK Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember The revised tentative grading plan has been reviewed by the former Director of Community Development. Although some of the new pads extend into slope areas the Director has determined that the proposed changes have no substantial impact to scope, views, or environment. NOTE: Slope analysis map previously reviewed by Council will be available for reference, if needed. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council approve the request to modify the grading plan per the revised lot envelope plan and "exhibit A" subject to the following: 1. All previously approved conditions. 2. Applicant shall pay all additional staff costs associated with this revision. attachments: 1. Approved vesting tent. tract map 4620 2. Lot envelope plan (revised) . 3. Exhibit A • POTTER ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERS 12 N. ASH ST. VENTURA, CA 93001 1806) 6536373 March 25, 1992 City Engineer City of Moorpark 111 A Poindexter Ave. Moorpark, CA 93021 Attn: Dirk Lovett, Asst. City Engineer ' Subject: Tract 4620, JBH Development, Revised lot envelopes Dear Mr. Lovett: ( Enclosed is a map of revised lot envelopes we propose for this project. Also is a plot of these proposed envelopes superimposed over a print of the envelopes as shown on the tentative map. These envelopes are revised to accomodate the final design of the pads. The pads and envelopes are as we discussed in our previous meeting with you and Pat Richards. It is our understanding that these revisions are of such nature that an administrative or Council consent approval will be sufficient. Please let us know if you would like a meeting to go over this proposed revision to the lot envelopes. Very trul _. David L. Potter Civil Engineer E_A61.4- A Paye 26,-P 3 ' POTTER ENGINEERING CIVIL ENGINEERS 12 N. ASH ST. VENTURA, CA 93001 M 1805) 653-6373 March 25, 1992 City Engineer City of Moorpark 111 A Poindexter Ave. Moorpark, CA 93021 Attn: Dirk Lovett, Asst. City Engineer Subject: Tract 4620, JBH Development, Revised pad grades Dear Mr. Lovett: Enclosed is a listing of the pad grades we propose for this project. Some of them exceed the 2 foot limit of change allowed by ordinance. The primary reason for the changes is the normal adjustment of final grades during the detail design stage. Five lots which had been shown as having graded pads, will not be graded at this time. These lots have a sufficiently gentle natural slope that is easily accomodated by a specific lot design with grading to fit the house architecture. Thirty-three lots will have pad elevations essentially the same as shown on the tentative plans. The balance of 28 lots will have changes in pad elevations varying from 3 feet to 31 feet as can be seen on the attached list. The average change for all lots is only 3". We can meet with you at your convenience to go over the specifics of each lot if you wish. Otherwise, please set the wheels in motion to have this matter reviewed for approval by the staff and the City Council by consent action as previously discussed. jrulye . David L. Potter Civil Engineer t7xCi9 + A- Pays 30-P3 —_ TRACT 4820 _1.___ PROPOSED PAD ELEVATION REVISIONS L._ LOT TM ELEV PROP ELEV DIFFERENCE REMARKS i 712 712 0 NO CHANGE 2 730 742 12 ft 3 802 _ 798 -4 4 812 NATURAL-TO SUITHOUSE 6 776775 0 "NOCHANGE' " " ""' B 882 882 0 NO CHANGE 7 875 875 0 NO CHANGE 8 , 732 732 0 NO CHANGE 9 782 NATURAL-TO SUIT HOUSE 10 758 758 0 NO CHANGE 11 '_ 724 724 0 NO CHANGE • 12 777 7770 _ NO CHANGE .. _13_-.8177 804- _-_:13 —14 865 860 5 I w , '`. ,„s 15 __710 705_ •5 - " 16 762-- 786 - 3 17 709 709 0 NO CHANGE - _._.. 18 770 801 31 - ---- 19 890 878 -14 � 20 882 882 0 NO CHANGE 21 953 953 0 NO CHANGE - ---- " - 22 96F- 955 3 ',.... .` ... _.. .._____.... 22__8622 8610 _ NO CHANGE -29- ..- 890 890 0 NO CHANGE : ..:.: ,.. ,.. .._. 26 922 917 •6 I - - - --_- 26 890 890 0 NO CHANGE 27 830 812 •18 I 28 735 735 0 NO CHANGE 29 720 720 0 NO CHANGE --"- 30 708 708 0 NO CHANGE _ 31 700 ,NATURAL-TO SUIT HOUSE 32 810 806 -4 , - .._. -54 _ __744__ 764__ _10_ 34785 786 0 _ NO CHANGE - -- --------_ - --- - - ... 36_ _785 •8 - 808 36 BOB 800 8 { 37 802 802 0 NO CHANGE 38 762 758 •4 - _39 -� 764 753 •11 _40 787 _787 _ _0 NO CHANGE ". • 41 804 798 -8 42---807801 ---_ 8_- - .._L. 43 805 806 0 NO CHANGE _.. .. ...., .. ... _44 - 800 -- 806 --6 48 __880 _ 696 15_ 48 755 762 7 Tr 835 835 0 ' NO CHANGE 46-'- 765 788 3 49 8_65 865 0 NO CHANGE 60 865 875 10 51 840 840 _ 0 NO CHANGE 52 - 880 —_ NATURAL-TO SUIT HOUSE _63 785 786_ __0 NO CHANGE .-i -----T--6-7F- 54 765 765 '! 0 NO CHANGE 6T879 675 0 NO CHANGE 56 660 660 0 NO CHANGE 57 695 695 0 NO CHANGE 58 725 725 0 NO CHANGE 59 762 - 758 6 I _60 76E-----7-65 765 _ 0 NO CHANGE -- . • 61 _ 785_ 778 •7 " 62 _ __776 - 780 _ •-5 --.I 63 780 -_ "" - --_. - -- _. NATURAL 70 SUIT HOUSE 64 _ 780 780 0 "-- NO CHANGE - _65 _755 755.-.. . ---- _86 _ __ _ _ _6 . Nntn;Only 3"'worm) AVERAGE CHANGE "- "-- -`-`__ 1 -0.24 -.__. —�"L ahengel --•.