Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1994 0921 CC REG ITEM 08CTO: FROM: DATE: AGENDA REPORT CITY OF MOORPARK The Honorable City Council Dirk Lovett, Assistant City Engineer ITEM D • L► •� U) September 12, 1994 (CC Meeting of September 21, 1994) SUBJECT: Unreinforced Masonry Buildings, Status Report Widespread concerns over earthquake safety caused the state legislature to pass SB547. This bill required the City to survey for potentially hazardous unreinforced masonry buildings and to implement a mitigation program reducing the hazards. The survey for these buildings was completed during the summer of 1989 and seven (7) potentially hazardous buildings were identified. In March of 1990 the City Council adopted Ordinance 127 requiring the strengthening of those unreinforced masonry buildings. In October 1990, pursuant to Ordinance 127, the owners of these seven buildings were notified that they must begin the process of strengthening these buildings. Between October 1990 and the Northridge earthquake of January 17, 1994: Four of the seven buildings were strengthened and the permits for the work were finaled, One of the seven buildings was demolished by the owners, Permits were issued for the last two, 71 -95 High St. (Robertos Barber Shop, The Whistle Stop, and Simi Valley Bank), and 105 High St.(Mayflower Market) but no work was done and the permits expired. One of these remaining two buildings (105 High St.) was extensively damaged on January 17, 1994 and the unsafe portion of this building has since been demolished. Unreinforced Masonry Buildings Status Report September 13, 1994 Page 2 The other (71 -95 High Street) has not yet been strengthened and the owners remain in violation of Ordinance 127. (Permits for the retrofitting of this building were issued on October 23, 1991 but no work was done and the permit expired.) Earthquake damage assessments following the January 17, 1994 earthquake resulted in the identification one additional building of unreinforced masonry construction. This building, located at 169- 173 High Street, was damaged on January 17, 1994 and engineered shoring was installed. The owner of this building had not been notified to strengthen this building pursuant to Ordinance 127. The fact that no notice had been sent means that he is not technically in violation of the ordinance. Plans for the repair /upgrade of this building were submitted on August 24, 1994. The project engineer has suggested that repairs can be complete by November 15, 1994. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Direct Building and Safety Staff to contact the owner of 71 -95 High Street and attempt to facilitate compliance with Ordinance 127. In the event that progress has not been made on the strengthening of this building within one month then direct Code Enforcement to initiate appropriate action to gain compliance. 2. Direct Building and Safety Staff to process the required notice arid'require the strengthening of 169 -173 High Street. In the event that compliance is not gained within the time frames outlined in Ordinance 127 then direct that Code Enforcement initiate appropriate action to gain compliance.