HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1992 1216 CC REG ITEM 11CTO:
FROM:
DATE:
MOORPARK ITEM"//,, Cb
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864
AGENDA REPORT
The Honorable City Council
.'OORPARK, CALIFORMA
Cn Council Meefing
of / -,2 - )Y--. 199 _-�7-
ACTION: �/ ►-nom
BYA
Jim Aguilera, Director of Community Development *`
December 10, 1992 (CC Meeting of 12/16/92)
SUBJECT: TUSCANY HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION LETTER DATED 11/30/92
BACKGROUND:
The Council has received a letter from the Tuscany Homeowners
Association (HOA) requesting that this item be placed on the
Council agenda for December 16, 1992. (See attached letter dated
November 20, 1992.) Staff has had several contacts recently with
members of the HOA and representatives of Urban West Communities
(UWC) regarding this and other issues.
DISCUSSION:
Issues:
Apparently the HOA is unhappy with the prospect of having UWC
convert the original model homes to saleable homes. The HOA is
expecting the City to assist them in preventing UWC from taking
this action. The HOA believes that they were "promised" that the
models would remain until all homes in the Tuscany tract were sold.
Findings:
Staff has researched the issue and has found that UWC filed for a
minor modification on April 24, 1992 for the purpose of adding new
models.
The HOA filed an appeal which was later withdrawn due to an
agreement which was reached between the HOA and UWC (see
attachment).
That agreement allows UWC to proceed to construct new models and is
very specific about not mentioning the status of the existing
models. Mrs. Lori Rutter claims that the president of the HOA
acted without HOA approval in signing the agreement.
PAUL *rL4Ri;§ ghArJF;.C, 1992 JdFI gtJkGjkhTA4CANY.2 SCOTT MONTGOMERY BERNARDO M. PEREZ ROY E. TALLEY JR.
Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember
The Honorable City Council
December 10, 1992
Page -2-
City Involvement:
Staff believes that the concerns voiced in the letter by the HOA
dated November 30, 1992 are a private party dispute and should be
handled accordingly. Further, staff has researched the City codes,
State laws, and the conditions of approval and we have found no
authority granting the City the ability to restrict model homes
from being converted to saleable homes.
RECOMMENDATION:
Direct staff as deemed appropriate.
crl December 10, 1992 -A: \C0UNCIL \TUSCANY.2
June 16, 1992
Mr. Bill Phelps
Interim Director of Community Development
City of Moorpark
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Dear Mr. Phelps:
I hereby withdraw the appeal, dated May 28, 1992, of the Director of
Community Development and the Moorpark City Council decision to allow
Urban West Communities to build seven (7) new models in Tracts 4341 and
4342.
a
Sin rely,
Craig Kuske
President, Mountain Meadows Tuscany Homeowners Association
-- RECEIVED —
J U s; ; 1992
Nhi of Moorpark
Mr. Steven Kueny, City Manager
City of Moorpark
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, California 93021
Dear Mr. Kueny,
Pb 10 1 (T r.At+ L{34
h I II, r( +3t.
we, the undersigned homeowners, hereby appeal the city
council approved motion, dated May 20, 1992 regarding
the modification of the Master Plan at WEST RANCH,',,, Q E,
We believe many more homeowners from Tuscany,
Deauville, and Belmont will express opposition to this
modification of the Master Plan, than are represented
by our signatures below. But because no public
announcement was made of the city's deliberation on
this matter, we have had less than a day's time to
prepare this appeal.
we ask that the city again review its decision on this
matter once we, the existing homeowners, have an
opportunity to express our opinion before you.
Sincerely, i1_ ,,.
11 b l I rin eA l,-- 0
krA-Aci, .r.,,,. ' : (; 4*4C r-e�o-c4 ke, t,-,J S f XO)q Z .
cc: Honorable City Council Members
RECEIVED
MAY 2 6 1992
City o! ftrparM
CITY OF MOORPARK
799 MOORPARK AVENUE
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021
805/529 -6864
APPEAL FORM MUST BE FILED WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE DECISION
To: V City Council Date:
Planning Commission
I hereby appeal the decision of the
which was given on
The decision was as follows:
I
The grounds of appeal are: (attach additional sheets as needed)
NA J
Address of Appellant: 11667 h np d a le- VOa A Mon - -pa, L x 31 l
Telephone Number of Appellant:
Is the appellant a party in the application? If not, state basis for filling
appeal as an "aggrieved person."
Signature of Appellant:
CRL- 01- 14- 92(9:34am)C:\WP5 I\FORNS\APPEAL
Date: Ib'{G�1 �� ��t t 2-
rS
RECEIPT
j b ,
Appeal and deposit fee of:
Received at a.m /p.m, on
19
By: Community Development Department
Signed:
Title:
APPEAL PERIODS
I
1. Appeals of all entitlement, permits and administrative decisions shall be filled within
10 calendar days following the date of approval, conditional approval, denial or date
of the alleged error. (Section 8111.2 * * *)
2. An appeal of a Planning Commission decision shall be filed within 10 calendar days
following the date a decision was rendered.
3. An appeal of an environmental decision shall be filed within 10 working days following
the date a decision was rendered.
* * *If the end of an appeal period falls upon a weekend or holiday, the appeal must be
filed by 5:00 p.m. on the first working day thereafter.
CRL- 01- 19- 92(9:39 am) C: \NP51 \FORMS \APPEAL
Y�a,rE � � rn ®�. e�! C�a�'1s �►.� � � v� -}�,� L � -��+ --mss
1�.`fir� i P d W�vi° ( �n ►n n -1e,�. ��n�u, f ou n
4-D c,�7�c-ev� �Ls cir� op
,T)P—C:Ls i u,-\� -- VVN -&V --I r-� b-o� 6t c,�-�
t-)a ,-e4 in' +ni s CA. ,E d,.P. {v YYlr.
�Aj
Y 6e j G „.{' S, -gQ � c+ lov
Lo-CL” l vv L � r-j-- a
l vv�� V1 ►mod wo � 1-0-4
a-s yy,, l vbw V S - N'Y,.-x J OY', �eh- 114 1�C