The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAGENDA REPORT 1994 0907 CC REG ITEM 11DTO: FROM: DATE: AGENDA REPORT The Honorable City Council Jaime Aguilera, Director of Paul Porter, Senior Planner August 5, 1994 (CC meeting Community of August ITEM I I • :Do,-,) J Developme 9 17, 1994) SUBJECT: APPEAL NO. 94 -2 OF MINOR MODIFICATION NO. 8 TO CPD 89 -2 (Mission Bell Plaza) ON 'iME APPLICATION OF SHELL OIL COMPANY Background: On February 10, 1994, Shell Oil Company submitted Minor Modification No. 8 for CPD 89 -2 for approval of a thirty -five (35) foot wide driveway to be located on Los Angeles Avenue easterly of the existing Carl's Junior Restaurant. The proposed curb -cut would be located approximately 120 feet west of the intersection of Park Lane and Los Angeles Avenue with Proposal "A" and approximately 70 feet west of the intersection with proposal B (see Attachment 3). The appeal was heard by the City Council on July 6, 1994. and continued to August 17, 1994 to allow the applicant time to obtain additional traffic information and to have the police Department research accident records at other key intersections throughout the City. Attached for your information and review in preparation for the hearing is a memorandum from Deputy Fitzgerald to Lt. Rouse dated August 3, 1994. On July 27, 1994, staff sent a memorandum to the City Council indicating the Department of Community Development received information from the applicant regarding the proposed curb -cut on Los Angeles Avenue. This information which was previously forwarded to the Council (and attached to this report - Exhibit 3) in preparation for the City Council meeting on August 17, 1994, should be considered when deliberating whether to allow the proposed curb -cut on Los Angeles Avenue. A copy of the memorandum from the Sheriff's Department and information from the applicant has also been sent to the City Engineer for review and comment prior to the August 17, 1994 Council meeting. As of the writing of this report, the City Engineer's recommendations regarding this matter was not available. Reduction in Landscaping: The applicants two alternatives for a proposed curb -cut on Los Angeles Avenue would reduce the existing landscaping along Los Angeles Avenue. Proposal "A" which shows one curb -cut approximately 120 feet west of Park Lane 46Wrd Tb'su-lt, in a loss,o_f ' approximately 875 square feet of landscape - "'�'�i�hr�ib Proposal �B "�' _n �/ f —� OF 1 t 9 i which has duel curb -cuts and is located approximately 70 feet from Park Lane would reduce the existing landscaping by approximately 1250 square feet. Staff Comments: The Council specifically approved this project without a curb -cut on Los Angeles Avenue on the basis that a curb -cut on Los Angeles Avenue in front of the Shell Service Station would potentially increase traffic hazards on Los Angeles Avenue. The applicant was informed that in order for staff to consider approval of this modification the applicant would be required to design and construct a raised median with landscaping along Los Angeles Avenue from Park Lane to Liberty Bell Road to prevent vehicles from making left -hand turns to or from the site. The Director of Community Development reviewed the proposed Minor Modification and denied it on April 19, 1994, because the applicant informed staf f that they had received a letter from A &S Engineering dated March 30, 1994 indicating that Caltrans would not approve a median. The applicant filed Appeal No. 94 -2 on May 3, 1994 (within the statutory time limit) indicating that the proposed driveway had been reviewed and considered acceptable to the City Engineer, and Caltrans with minor modifications. Staff is of the opinion that without the median, motorists will attempt to make a left turn from the proposed driveway even if the applicant posts a no -left turn sign. Making a left turn across Los Angeles Avenue into or from the site would create a safety hazard. Recommendation: Direct staff as Attachments: 1. 2. 3. 4. Seemed appropriate. Resolution for denial of Appeal Resolution for approval of Appeal Memorandum to City Council dated July 27, 1994 Memorandum from Deputy Fitzgerald to Lt. Rouse dated August 3, 1994 2 RESOLUTION NO. - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA DENYING APPEAL NO. 94 -2 OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT'S DENIAL OF MINOR MODIFICATION NO. 8 TO COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 89 -2 (SHELL OIL COMPANY) WHEREAS, on February 10, 1994, Shell Oil Company submitted Minor Modification No. 8 for CPD 89 -2 for approval of a thirty -five (35) foot wide driveway to be located on the north side of Los Angeles Avenue approximate],;- 120 feet west of Park Lane; and WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development reviewed the proposed Minor Modification and denied it on April 19, 1994; and WHEREAS, the applicant filed Appeal No. 94 -2 on May 3, 1994 (within the statutory time 1. *.mit); and WHEREAS, at the City Council hearing on July 6, 1994, the City Council considered the application filed by Shell Oil Company, requesting approval of Appeal No. 94 -2; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of July 6, 1994, the City Council opened the public hearing, took testimony from all those wishing to testify and closed the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council after review and consideration of the information contained in t-he staff report dated August 5, 1994 has reached a decision on this matter. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City Council denies Appeal No. 94 -2 PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 6TH DAY OF JULY, 1994. ATTEST: City Clerk t PP06:24:94 120:53aM: \APL942.RSS i Mayor of the City of Moorpark ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA APPROVING APPEAL NO. 94 -2 OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT'S DENIAL OF MINOR MODIFICATION NO. 8 TO COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 89 -2 (SHELL OIL COMPANY) WHEREAS, on February 10, 1994, Shell Oil Company submitted Minor Modification No. 8 for CPD 89 -2 for approval of a thirty -five ( 35 ) foot wide driveway to be located on the north side of Los Angeles Avenue approximately 120 feet west of Park Lane; and WHEREAS, the Director of Community Development reviewed the proposed Minor Modification and denied it on April 19, 1994; and WHEREAS, the applicant filed Appeal No. 94 -2 on May 3, 1994 (within the statutory time limit); and WHEREAS, at the City Council hearing on August 17, 1994, the City Council considered the application filed by Shell Oil Company, requesting approval of Appeal No. 94 -2; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of August 17, 1994, the City Council opened the public hearing, took testimony from all those wishing to testify and closed the public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council after review and consideration of the information contained in the staff report dated August 5, 1994 has reached a decision on this matter. NOti ;, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City Council denies the Appeal of Condition No. 1 and approves the appeal with respect to the proposed relocation of the monument sign. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1994. ATTEST: City Clerk PP06 :16:9419 :06&zA:\942RBS.APR i Mayor of the City of Moorpark ATTACHMENT 2 �F`ILE COFY AGENDA REPORT TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Jaime Aguilera, Director of Community Developmen4/ Paul Porter, Senior Planner DATE: July 27, 1994 SUBJECT: RECEIPT OF INFORMATION FROM APPLICANT REGARDING APPEAL NO. 94 -2 OF MINOR MODIFICATION NO. 8 TO CPD 89 -2 (Mission Bell Plaza).ON THE APPLICATION OF SHELL OIL COMPANY The Department of Community Development has received information from the applicant regarding the proposed curb -cut on Los Angeles Avenue. This informatics is attached for the Council's review in preparatiop for the City Council meeting on August 17, 1994. Attachments: 1. Memorandum to A &S Engineering dated 1994. 2. Plot plan with proposed curb -cut Angeles Avenue (Proposal A and B). CC. Steve Rueny, City Manager Paul Porter, Senior Planner Case File Chroni File PP07r27r94110+01&":\27JUL94.CC ATTACHMENT`, July 15, on Los Linscott, Law & Greenspan, I`ngineers MEMORANDUM TO: Ahmad Ghaderi, A & S Engineering - Fax (818) 842 -3760 Larry Turner, Shell Oil Company - Fax (818) 226 -1536 FROM: Jack M. Greenspan DATE: July 15, 1994 SUBJECT: DISCUSSION POINTS CI IANNELIZED RIGHT -TURN IN /OUT DRIVEWAY Shell Station NWC Leis Angeles Avenue and Park Lane, Moorpark The fallowing Presents the key discussion points in favor of the alternative angled right -turn in /right -turn out entry -exit driveway layout for the existing Moorpark Shell station, located on the northwest- corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Park Lane. 1. Directs exiting traffic to right. The 45 degree angle exit driveway facilitates the desired Right -Turn Only by directing exiting vehicles into a right -turn movement. 2, Produces Right -Turn Only entry, "shadowed" from potential eastbound left- turns. The east half of the large triangular island which separates the angled entry and exit driveways will block any eastbound left -turn movement into the entry driveway. 3. Contains large "pork chop" island (at least 50 foot base along Los Angeles Avenue) which will not, in itself, he a potenti,,d traffic hazard. 4. Entry-exit layout positioned as far away from Park Lane as possible, essentially starts at joint property line with Carl's Jr. 5. Driveway width of 18 feet will accommodate Single Unit 30 (SU -30) design vehicle (turn radius of 42 feet). The SU -30 is it standard 30 -foot long single unit vehicle and represents the delivery truck which has a 20 foot wheel base. 6. Entry driveway is 115 feet from the east curb of Park Lane (the point at which westbound right -turn vehicles would begin their approach to the entry driveway) and 75 feet from the west curb of Park Lanc. JMG:tk A c c 1 S$ k 0 A II - -� L O S A N C C L E S W V C wi W —, [ I I I I I I 21 YI <I a� I I ,Am Ni.af SHELL OIL COMPANY PROPOSED�DRIVEWAY PUN _ h- CGA. LOS .taus +.t A — „ n..t, r.i..er• � roor.r. w.a... h S CNCINEERINC R o.m w f.an o -t;— ` T / air r.a wrr I•I lei / ,e .— 1fTIf] I 4-4 f L I qtr' ' -�— _ _ _l, ur .r.r err � �,..... .. •I. - -� L O S A N C C L E S W V C wi W —, [ I I I I I I 21 YI <I a� I I ,Am Ni.af SHELL OIL COMPANY PROPOSED�DRIVEWAY PUN _ h- CGA. LOS .taus +.t A — „ n..t, r.i..er• � roor.r. w.a... h S CNCINEERINC R o.m w f.an o -t;— =I a, �I �I - - - - -_- L O S A N G( L E S A V E N U E ( County of Ventura Sherif'f`s Department MEMORANDUM TO: Lt. Rouse FROM: Dep. Fitzgerald DATE: August 3, 1994 SUBJECT: DATA FOR SHELL STATION PROJECT At your request, I have compiled some data on the amount of citations written and traffic collisions recorded for some of the areas in question regarding the request from Shell Oil Company to construct an ingresslegress driveway on Los Angeles Ave. I have talked with Bud about the project and discussed some options that may be considered for the project. Below you will find a list of the number of collision reports that we have taken at the various intersections that the council has inquired about We are limited to the collisions only for the past year (1993) since SWITRS does not come out with a list until the end of the year. The citation data has been broken down into the past three (3) years (1992,1993,1994). We looked at citations which were issued for these violations: 22349 V.C. Exceed the Maximum Speed Limit 21461(a) V.C. Fail to Obey a Traffic Sign 21651(a) V.C. Drive Across a Center Divider There were no citations written for 21461(a) at the intersection of Spring Road and High Street for vehicles making a left turn as they exit the Union 76 Station driveway on Spring Road. This section was not enforced at this area due to the size of the signs posted (smaller than usual; not a minimum of 17" X 22 "). Plus, we had no accidents occurring because of motorists violating the sign. All citations written at this intersection were for the right turn on red violation from east bound High Street onto south bound Spring Road. These citations were not included in the figures. RECEIVED AUU 1 01994 city of Moorpark ATTACHMENT 4 community Development Departrr 21651 V.C. VIOLATIONS (Crossing Over Center Divider) There were a total of 539 citations written for this section over the past three years to date in the entire city, with 396 (74 %) issued in the areas in question. 1992 208 citations written. 1993 225 citations written. 1994 106 citations written. Los Angeles Ave. / Moorpark Ave. 1992 - 75 citations 1993 - 86 citations 1994 - 17 citations Los Angeles Ave. / Spring Road 1992 - 37 citations 1993 - 101 citations 1994 - 73 citations Los Angeles Ave. / Park Lane 1992 - 7 citations 1993 - 6 citations 1994 - 0 citations 21461 V.C. VIOLATIONS (Fail to Obey Regulatory Sign) There were a total of 538 citations written for this section over the past three years to date in the entire city, with 230 (43 %) issued in the areas in question. 1992 285 citations written. 1993 183 citations written. 1994 70 citations written. Los Angeles Ave. / Moorpark Ave. 1992 - 24 citations 1993 - 37 citations 1994 - 18 citations Los Angeles Ave. / Spring Road 1992 - 15 citations 1993 - 32 citations 1994 - 58 citations Los Angeles Ave. / Park Lane 1992 - 101 citations 1993 - 23 citations 1994 - 13 citations TRAFFIC COLLISIONS FOR 1993 I used the SWITRS information for my research and documentation for the following statistics. This information is only for the previous year (1993) as there is no current documentation available for 1994. The total number of collisions for the areas in question is 54, and these are broken down into areas as well as the primary collision factor. New Los Angeles Ave. / Spring Road 9 collisions 3 -right of way 2- improper turn 1 -speed 3 -other (incl. DUI) SIR 118 / Spring Road (76 Sta) 16 collisions 3 -right of way 3 -wrong side 5 -speed 5 -other (incl. DUI) Los Angeles Ave. / Moorpark Ave. 19 collisions 3 -right of way 4- improper turn 6 -speed 6 -other (incl. DUI) Los Angeles Ave. / Park Lane 5 collisions 2 -right of way 1 -lane change 1- unsafe start I -(DUI) Los Angeles Ave. / Liberty Bell 5 collisions I -right of way 1- improper turn 1 -speed 1- passing 1 -other VIOLATIONS BY LOCATION Los Angeles Avenue and Park Lane Below is a list of the violations that have occurred near the intersection of Los Angeles ave. and Park Lane in the City of Moorpark. The violations have been broken down even further into the number of violations per year. There were a total of 174 citations written at the intersection of Los Angeles avenue and Park Lane during the past three years. As you will notice, the number of citations issued for the violation of section 21651 V C. (Driving over a center divider) has decreased over the past three years. This is due primarily to the change in design of the roadway over the past three years and the accompanying re- striping of the roadway surface. There has also been a decrease in theXumber of citations written for the violation of section 21461 V.C. (Fail to obey a regulatory sign) This has been due to the change in staffing at the Moorpark Police Department and the focus of attention to other areas of enforcement in the communitv YEAR VIOLATION NUMBER OF CITATIONS 1992 22349 V.C. 12 citations 1993 22349 V.0 9 citations 1994 22349 V.C. 3 citations Total Citations 24 citations 1992 21651 V.C. 7 citations 1993 21651 V.C. 6 citations 1994 21651 V.C. 0 citations Total Citations 13 citations 1992 21461 V.0 101 citations 1993 21461 V.C. 23 citations 1994 21461 V.C. 13 citations Total Citations 137 citations Los Angeles-Avenue and Spring Road Below is a list of the violations that have occurred near the intersection of Los Angeles Ave. and Spring Road. The violations have been broken down even further into the number of violations per year. There were a total of 326 citations written at the intersection of Los Angeles Ave. and Spring during the past three years for the for the violations listed below. YEAR 1992 1993 1994 1992 1993 1994 VIOLATION 22349 V.C. 22349 V.C. 22349 V.C. Total Citations 21651 V.C. 21651 V.C. 21651 V.C. Total Citations NUMBER OF CITATIONS 2 citations 2 citations 6 citations 10 citations 37 citations 101 citations 73 citations 211 citations 1992 21461 V.C. 15 citations 1993 21461 V.C. 32 citations 1994 21461 V.C. 58 citations Total Citations 105 citations Los Angeles Avenue and Moorpark Avenue Below is a list of the violations that have occurred near the intersection of Los Angeles Ave. and Moorpark Ave. The violations have been broken down further into the number of violations for each year. There were a total of 258 citations written near the intersection of Los Angeles Ave. and Moorpark Ave. during the past three years. As you will notice, there are very few citations written for section 22349 V.C. (Exceeding the maximum speed limit), because this is a signal controlled intersection and the speed of vehicles is regulated by the signal phasing. The number of violations for both section 21651 V.C. (Left turn over a divided highway) and 21461 V.C. (Failure to obey a regulatory sign) have remained consistent throughout the years. YEAR VIOLATION 1992 22349 V.C. 1993 22349 V.C. 1994 22349 V.C. Total Citations 1992 21651 V.C. 1993 21651 V.C. 1994 21651 V.C. Total Citations 1992 21461 V.C. 1993 21461 V.C. 1994 21461 V.C. Total Citations NUMBER OF CITATIONS 0 citations 0 citations 1 citation 1 citation 75 citations 86 citations 17 citations 178 citations 24 citations 37 citations 18 citations 79 citations As you can see from the above statistics, there are a number of motorists who ignore the posted signs and markings regulating the traffic flow. There have also been a significant number of collisions at each of the areas in question. As you can see, there was at least one collision caused by a right of way violation at each of the intersections. Three of the intersections had at least three collisions each caused by right of way violations. As part of the research for this memorandum, we included a random survey of approximately 12 customers of the Shell station, soliciting their opinions regarding an entrance/exit at the station on Los Angeles Ave. All of these people said that they had been at the station during periods of high traffic volume at one time or another. They all found it very difficult to move around inside the station parking lot. All of them recommended the installation of at least an exit driveway onto westbound Los Angeles Ave. Considering the opinions of the people who use the station and the safety issues expressed above, I have some ideas that you may want to consider as conditions of construction, if the City Council starts to lean in favor of the project. 1 The first idea is to leave the station the way it is now, and not allow the construction of any driveway onto Los Angeles Ave I believe that this may be justified by the collision figures shown above. 2 The possibility of constructing an exit only driveway from the parking lot to allow customers to exit onto westbound Los Angeles Ave. only. This can be accomplished by means of a curved driveway and the posting of a sign, prohibiting left turns, at the exit. 3 The possibility of constructing both an entry/exit driveway from Los Angeles Ave. These would be curved in such a way that they would allow vehicles to enter or exit from westbound Los Angeles Ave. only. If the City Council favors the idea of constructing a curved driveway (exit only or a combination of both), I would recommend that the westbound #3 lane of Los Angeles Ave., east of Park Lane, be made into a right turn only lane. This would allow traffic exiting the gas station some degree of safety while turning onto westbound Los Angeles Ave. I would also recommend that the traffic lanes on Park Lane, north of Los Angeles Ave. be repainted to allow for easier access making a left turn into the shopping center, reducing back up on Los Angeles Ave. I have attached some simple drawings to help illustrate my ideas and give a visual reference for the intersection. I included both the way the intersection exists, as well as my opinions for some improvements. (see attached diagrams) Please feel free to contact me at any time with questions N • �_� �R�ENr LAya�T 5 ELL STA. LO AM, .i t E f-) nvE_ . �JI I I F.1, � 1 J \+l_I .11v I 10\(( r3c z -�O T 0 N v I1� l\NI( [ I k n �� A & S ENGINEERING INCE _ PLANNING • ENGINEERING • CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 207 W. AAiEDA All~ STE. 203 • BUM40 Cpl 91502 • PHOt1E 818442 -3644 • FAX 818 - 842 -3760 y AUGUST 30, 1994 CITY OF MOORPARK DEPT. OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 799 MOORPARK AVE. MOORPARK, CA. 93201 ATTN: MR. JIM AGUILLERA 1 RE: SHELL OIL CO. N.W. CORNER OF LOS ANGELES AVE. & PARKLANE MOORPARK, CA. MINOR MODIFICATION NO. 8 `i•0 CPD 89 -2 REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE DEAR MR. AGUILLERA, PER OUR CONVERSATION LAST, WEEK, ON BEHALF OF SHELL OIL CO., WE HEREBY RESPECTFULLY REQUEST A CONTINUANCE OF OUR SEPTEMBER 7TH HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL TO SEPTEMBER 21ST. THIS IS DUE TO THE FACT THE ENGINEER FROM CALTRANS WILL BE OUT OF THE OFFICE ON VACATION TILL SEPT. 6TH, AND I DOUBT WE WILL BE ABLE TO GET COMMEN'T'S FROM CALTRANS IN TIME TO YOUR OFFICE FOR YOUR DISTRIBUTION TO THE COUNCIL. IF YOU NEED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, PLEASE GIVE ME A CALL AT 818- 842 -3644. i V ULY YOURS, AHMAD GHADERI CC: SHELL OIL CO.- MR. LARRY TURNER s ` RECEIVED ._ AUG 3 1 1994 City of Moorpar k I! dG 01 iAU M11RT. STF. 303. • WAl NUT CREEK. CA. 94596 • PHONE: 510 - 933 -0578 *FAX: 510- 933 -0588 TOTAL P.02 AUG 30 194 15:47 SEP -21 -1994 15:24 FRCh1 A & S ININERINGINCI PLANNING • ENGINEERING *CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT T to* 207 M. A AEDA AYE.. STE. 203 • BURB". CA 91502 • PHONE 81&-M2-3644 * FAX $18- 842 -3760 FAX TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEET DATE: 9- 21-'94 TIME: 3:15 a.m. *p. M. TO: MS. LILIAN HARE COMPANY: CITY OF MOORPARK- CITY CLERK'S OFFICE FAX NUMBER: 805- 529 -8270 FROM: AHMAD GHADERI RE: LETTER OF EXPLANATION TO MR. AGUILLAR FOR OUR CONTINUANCE LOCATION: SHELL OIL CO.- LOS ANGELES & PEE CONKENTS : DEAR MS. HARE, PER OUR CONVERSATION A FEW MINUTES AGO, ATTACHED IS THE ADDITIONAL LETTER THAT I HAVE FORWARDED TO MR. AGUILLAR IN REGARD TO THE ABOVE MENTIONED PROJECT. I APPRECIATE YOUR ASSISTANCE IN FORWARDING COPIES OF THE ATTACHED TO THE COUNCIL MEMBERS FOR THEIR REVIEW FOR TONIGHTS HEARING. THANK YOU FOR ALL YOUR HELP. ATTENTION: IF YOU ARE EXPERIENCING ANY DIFFICULTIES IN RECEIVING THIS TRANSMISSION, PLEASE CONTACT US AT (818)842 -3644. TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES TRANSMITTED INCLUDING COVER SHEET: 2 CC: SHELL OIL CO.- MR. LARRY TURNER 49 QUAIL COURT, S1E. 303. & WALNUT CREEK, CA. 94596 • PHONE: 510 -933 -0578 • FAX: 510 -933 -0588 qFP 21 'Q4 15 :16 PAGE.001 I SEP -2_ -1994 15:25 A & S EI INERING INCI PLANNING • ENGINEERING • CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Lwo 207 w. AUWEDA AE, SSE 203 •WOW, U 91502 • NOE 818 -842 -,3644 o FAX 818- 812 -3760 SEPTEMBER 21, 1994 CITY OF MOORPARK DEPT. OF, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 79SO MOORPARK AVE. XOORPARKg CA. 93201 ATTN: MR. JIM AGUILLERA RE: SHELL OIL CO. 301 W. LOS ANGELES AVE. & PARKLANE MOORPARK, CA. PROPOSED DRIVEWAY MR. JIM$, AS DIRECTED BY CITY COUNCIL DURING OUR LAST HEARING, ON AUGUST 22ND, WE FORWARDED TO CALTRANS: (A) THE PROPOSED RE- STRIPING OF LOS ANGELES AVE AS PROPOSED BY THE SHERIFF'S DEPT. (B) LAYOUT FOR SHELL'S PROPOSAL "B^ FOR THE ANGLED INGRESS /EGRESS TO THE SITE. DUE TO COMPLEXITY OF THE PROPOSAL, CALTRANS VENTURA OFFICE, HAS REFERRED THE PROJECT TO THEIR OFFICE IN LOS ANGELES, AND ON SEPTEMBER STH, CALTRANS ISSUED A LETTER DENYING OUR' PSQUEST FOR THE PROPOSED ORIENTATION OF THE EGRESS FROM THE SITE. WE BELIEVE THAT CALTRANS HAS ERRED IN THEIR DECISION, AND WE ARE IN CONTACT WITH THEIR OFFICE IN LOS ANGELES TO DISCUSS THIS MATTER IN MORE DETAIL. WE APPRECIATE YOUR PATIENCE WITH US ON THIS PROJECT, OUR INTENTION IS TO MEET THE CITY'S NEEDS, AS WELL AS THE OTHER AGENCIES INVOLVED. WE APPRECIATE YOUR SUPPORT OF OUR REQUEST FOR OUR REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE, TRANSMITTED TO YOUR OFFICE ON SEPTEMBER 20TH. IF YOU NEED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO GIVE ME A CALL AT 818- 842 -3644. V OURS, AHMAD.GHADERI CC: *SHELL OIL CO.- MR. LARRY TURNER 49 Ot7aL COURT, STE. 303. • WALNUT CREEK, CA. 94596 • PHONE: 510- 933 -0378 .FAX: 510 - 933 -0588 TOTAL P.02 SEP 21 '94 15:17 PAGE.002 SEP -21 -1994 15:24 FROM .._._ A & S ININEIRINGINCI PLANNING • ENGINEERING *CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 207 11. ALAMEEM AYE.. S1E. 203 •BUR ", Cpl 91502 • PNM 818 -842 -3644 • FAX 818 - 842 -3760 FAX TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEET DATE: 9- 21-94 TIME: 3:15 a.m. *P.m. TO: MS. LILIAN HARE COMPANY: CITY OF MOORPARK- CITY CLERK'S OFFICE FAX NUMBER: 805- 529 -8270 FROM: AHMAD GHADERI RE: LETTER OF EXPLANATION TO NR. AGUILLA.R FOR OUR CONTINUANCE LOCATION: SHELL OIL CO.- LOS ANGELES & PARKLANE COMMENTS: DEAR MS. HARE, PER OUR CONVERSATION A FEW MINUTES AGO, ATTACHED IS THE ADDITIONAL LETTER THAT I HAVE FORWARDED TO MR. AGUILLAR IN REGARD TO THE ABOVE K131TIONZD PROJECT. I APPRECIATE YOUR ASSISTANCE IN FORWARDING COPIES OF THE ATTACHED TO THE COUNCIL MEMBERS FOR THEIR REVIEW FOR TONIGHTS HEARING. YOU FOR ALL YOUR HELP. ATTENTION: IF YOU ARE EXPERIENCING ANY DIFFICULTIES IN RECEIVING THIS TRANSMISSION, PLEASE CONTACT US AT (818)842 -3644. TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES TRANSMITTED INCLUDING COVER SHEET: 2 CC: SHELL OIL CO.- MR. LARRY TURNER 49 QUAIL COURT, SiE. 303, • WALNUT CREEK, CA. 94596 • PHONE: 510 -933 -0578 *FAX- 510- 933 -0588 Pgt-,F RR 1 A & S INGIN111.11N.0 INCI PLANNING • ENGINEERING • CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 207 W. &MCA A1E, SE. 203 *NO*, Ck 91502 • Pt X A18 -M2 -3644 • FAX Stb -812 -3760 SEPTEMBER 21, 1994 CITY of MOORPARK DEPT. OF. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 799 MOORPARK AVE. MO0RPARKj CA. 93201 ATTN: MR. JIM AGUILLERA RE: SHSLL OIL CO. 301 W. LOS ANGELES AVE. & PARKLANE MOORPARK, CA. PROPOSED DRIVEWAY DEAR. JIM, AS DIRECTED BY CITY COUNCIL DURING OUR LAST HEARING, ON :AUGUST 22ND, WE FORWARDED TO CALTRANS: (A) THE PROPOSED RE- STRIPING OF LOS ANGELES AVE AS PROPOSED BY THE SHERIFF'S DEPT. (8) LAYOUT FOR SHELL'S PROPOSAL "Bn FOR THE ANGLED INGRESS/ EGRESS TO THE SITE. DUE TO COMPLEXITY OF THE PROPOSAL, CALTRANS VENTURA. OFFICE, HAS REFERRED THE PROJECT TO THEIR OFFICE IN LOS ANGELES, AND ON SEPTEMBER STH, CALTRANS ISSUED A LETTER DENYING OUR! REQUEST FOR THE PROPOSED ORIENTATION OF THE EGRESS FROM THE SITE. WE BELIEVE THAT CALTRANS HAS ERRED IN THEIR DECISION, AND WE ARE IN CONTACT WITH THEIR OFFICE IN LOS ANGELES TO DISCUSS THIS MATTER IN MORE DETAIL. WE APPRECIATE YOUR PATIENCE WITH US ON THIS PROJECT, OUR INTENTION IS TO MEET THE CITY'S NEEDS, AS WELL AS THE OTHER AGENCIES INVOLVED. WE APPRECIATE YOUR SUPPORT OF OUR REQUEST FOR OUR REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE, TRANSMITTED TO YOUR OFFICE ON SEPTEMBER 20TH. IF YOU NEED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO GIVE ME A CALL AT 818- 842 -3644. P CC: SHELL OIL CO.- MR. LARRY TURNER 49 00AIL COURT, STE. 303, • WALNUT CREEK, CA. 94596 • PHONE: 510- 933 -0S78 *FAX: 510 - 9330588 TOTAL P.02 SEP 21 '94 15:17 PAGE.002