HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1991 0306 CC REG ITEM 11E MOORPARK ITEM I1. E .
:ORPARK, CAIJFORNW
PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. ciiyCou I Meefing oP^" °<<, STEVEN KUENY
Mayor of o°� °q,, City Manager
BERNARDO M. PEREZ 199. /Allje CHERYL J. KANE
Mayor Pro Tern ACTION: : ../ // /_ ektaCity Attorney
SCOTT MONTGOMERY Z a v�`hv PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Councilmember �4, ii -� • o� �. `o' Director of
JOHN E. WOZNIAK ;pr %// qq*E Community Development
Councilmember .� JOHN F. KNIPE
LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Engineer
City Clerk JOHN V.GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
MEMORANDUM RICHARD T. HARE
City Treasurer
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community Development
DATE: February 27, 1991 (City Council Meeting 3-6-91)
SUBJECT: CONSIDER PROCESSING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
WITH CARLSBERG FINANCIAL FOR THE PROPERTIES CONTAINED IN
THE CARLSBERG SPECIFIC PLAN
BACKGROUND
The City approved the Carlsberg Specific Plan on October 30, 1990 .
This Specific Plan area is a 497 acre landholding situated in the
southeastern portion of the city and bounded by New Los Avenue to
the north, Tierra Rejada Road to the south, the 123 Freeway to the
east and Spring Road to the west.
The Specific Plan includes 405 residential units, 25 acres of
business park use, 39 acres of sub-regional retail/commercial use,
7 acres of institutional use, 2 .5 acres of commercial restaurant
use and 243 .5 acres of open space and park use.
DISCUSSION
The consideration and approval of any Development Agreement is
regulated by Moorpark Ordinance No. 59 (see attachment) . In
accordance with Section 9 . 64 . 040 Preliminary Review; no application
for a Development Agreement shall be filed with the Director of
Community Development unless the City Council has decided, after a
preliminary review, to proceed with consideration of the proposal .
This section goes on to explain that the Director must transmit a
report and recommendation to the Council regarding whether or not
the City should consider the proposal further. Once the Council
has determined that the application has merit for further
consideration, it is returned to the Director for determining that
the Development Agreement is complete pursuant to Government Code
Section 65940 et. seq. The Director then has the responsibility to
set the matter before the Planning Commission at a public hearing.
•
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529-6864
The Honorable City Council
March 1, 1991 (CC meeting of 3/6/91)
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
Page -2-
The Commission is charged to give the Council a recommendation
regarding the Agreement.
On February 11, 1991 staff received a request by C.T. Financial
(Carlsberg Financial) to consider entering into a Development
Agreement so as to implement the recently approved Specific Plan.
The request was on behalf of Simi-Moorpark Freeway Properties, Ltd.
and Conejo Freeway Properties, Ltd. The request by C.T. Financial
is to have the City Council refer the matter of a Development
Agreement to City Staff and the Development Committee so as to
discuss the outline of a proposed agreement. The purpose would be
to identify potential issues for resolution prior to any drafting
of a formal agreement.
Inasmuch as the implementation of the Carlsberg Specific Plan may
occur over a significant time period and the construction of
various public works improvements need a coordinated effort; there
appears to be merit in considering a Development Agreement with the
current property ownership.
It should be noted that the City has no established fee for
processing a Development Agreement. Although C.T Financial has
deposited $1,000 with the City for consideration of a development
agreement; there is a need for the City to cover all it's
processing costs . It is anticipated that not only will City Staff
be involved with any future agreement consideration, but both the
City Engineer and City Attorney's office will be involved. An
additional deposit will be required of C.T. Financial prior to any
further consideration by the City. It is recommended that another
$4000. be deposited if the City Council proceeds with acceptance of
the Development Agreement application.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1. That the City Council determine that the proposal to consider
a Development Agreement for the implementation of the
Carlsberg Specific Plan has merit for further consideration,
and
2 . That the City uncil direct the Co nsty Development
Committee to et with the proponent *sr a Development
Agreement an the Council -,ter consider the Committee's
recommendation prior to the City Council sending the matter to
the Planning Commission.
3. Require a deposit oof�_ 9n additional deposit of $4,000 at this
33
time , 3.i ti.aa ge,/eler.enta,44,,,tatit
city_ /7 get:t /
tb S& Ca-a/IQGCZfreirJ f / , y