HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1991 0417 CC REG ITEM 11DMOORPARK
PAUL W. LAWRASON JR.MOORPARK. CALIFORNIA OPPK C", STEVEN KUENY
Mayor City Cou I Meeting o P ° i City Manager
BERNARDO M.PEREZ ./ f CHERYLJ.KANE
Mayor Pro Tern of �/ 7 199.1 City Attorney
SCOTT MONTGOMERY ACTION: o PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Counalmember Director of
JOHN E. WOZNIAK G _ , ^ Community Development
Councilmember �i✓ `° 'may JOHN F. KNIPE
LILLIAN KELLERMAN By City Engineer
City Clerk JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
RICHARD T. HARE
MEMORANDUM City Treasurer
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Philip E. Newhouse, Director of Community
Services M
DATE: April 12, 1991
SUBJECT: Consider Relocating Restroom Building at
South Meadows Park
This item is in response to several Quailridge Homeowners'
= equests to relocate the proposed restroom building at South
'Meadows Park.
BACKGROUND:
At the December 19, 1990 Council meeting, the Council
approved the addition of a restroom building at South Meadows
?ark. The site location approved by Council was the area
behind and adjacent to the northeast end of the parking lot
adjacent to Mountain Trail Street. This site was recommended.
:c Council for the following reasons:
1. Close proximity to the sewer stub into the park.
2. Close proximity to water and electrical service.
3. Close proximity to play area so parents can
supervise their children when at the restroom.
4. Unobstructed view from street for police
surveillance.
5. Area will be well lit by park security light
approximately 30 feet from front of building.
6. Visible from future shopping center which would
reduce loitering and vandalism.
DISCUSSION:
On April 5, 1991, Mrs. Colma, Mrs. Wilson and two other
residents of Rivergrove Street met with staff at City Hall.
"he group was concerned and upset, especially Mrs. Wilson,
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864
The Honorable City Council
Page 2
April 12, 1991
that a restroom was planned to be constructed within 30 feet
of the rear yard of her home which abuts the south property
ine of the park.
At the April 8, 1991 Parks and Recreation Commission meeting,
Mr. and Mrs. Wilson, Mrs. Colma and others were in
attendance. Mrs. Wilson presented a letter from "Quailridge
Homeowners" stating their objections to not only placing a
restroom at the park but the proposed location was clearly
unacceptable to the surrounding properties that border the
structure.
Mrs. Wilson's letter stated, "If a restroom be constructed at
the park, it should be more centrally located to another part- -
of the park." Others stated they were not totally opposed to
a restroom at this park but rather its proposed location. A
location further from the homes and closer to the front of
the park along Tierra Rejada was suggested.
Staff provided the homeowners a map and suggested they
identify one or two locations of preference to relocate the
restroom. Two locations close to Tierra Rejada, approximately
200 feet north of the south property line, were identified
(see attached map)
Staff reviewed the sites with a representative from - Urban
West Communities along with several other sites. The
ureferred site selected by staff is a site -close to site
Number 2 identified by the homeowners group. This site
appears to be workable for both the homeowners and from a
construction point of view. This site is the proposed
location for the picnic shelter. Should Council approve this
location, the picnic shelter would need to be relocated.
Staff recommends relocating the picnic shelter to the east
side of the play area (see attached map).
As Council is aware, Urban West Communities was requested to
construct a 500 square foot public restroom facility at South
Meadows Park. This would include installation of all
utilities for the structure not to exceed a total value of
$40,000.'
Due to time constraints, staff does not have construction
costs for your consideration at this time or has had the
opportunity to review staffs' proposed site location with
the Quailridge Homeowners. Staff will provide Mr. Peter Kolb,
President, Quailridge Homeowners Association with a copy of
the attached map for his review before your Council meeting
on Wednesday April 17.
=�e Honorable City Council
_ -ce 3
=i1 12, 1991
._ full size map of the park with the proposed homeowners and
staff site locations has been put up in the conference room
fcr your review.
Staff will endeavor.to have approximate construction costs
fcr your consideration based upon staff's proposed location
for you on or before your meeting on April 17.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Direct staff as deemed appropriate.
PEN :db
Attachment
— RECEIVED _.
APR S 1991
City of Moorpark
Date: April 8, 1991
To: City Council
Parks and Recreation Committee
From: Quailridge Homeowners
Re: Proposed Public Restroom in
South Meadows Park
We, as homeowners, bought in Mountain Meadows as a master
planned community. We knew there were rules and regulations
which we would have to follow and we abide by these on a
daily basis. We work with our homeowners association when we
make any changes to our property that will affect the
asthetic appearance to the neighborhood in any way. This
includes, but not limited to, painting, adding fences or
patio overhangs, planting trees and shrubbery and any
structure that can be seen over one's wall.
This is why we are apalled and upset at the decision
not only to put a public restroom in this park,
but the present location that has been selected for it, is
clearly unacceptable to the surrounding properties that
border this structure. When we purchased our homes
we accepted a park in this location, but there were never
any plans included for a restroom, especially in this
location. As it is now, the restroom sits 30 ft. from
the wall and 50 ft. from the living room of one homeowner
at 11901 River grove: This is the most undesirable location
one could imagine. Not only is the structure well over
the height of the wall, but the problems of noise, smell
(the prevailing westerly winds blow right toward the
homeowners), safety, security, vandalism and bright
lights are all our major concerns;
This public restroom borders a high school and soon
to be major retail center. This brings the potential of
loitering, vandalism, and drug problems to name a few.
This restroom, should it have to be at this park, should
clearly be as far away as possible from any home and
located near a street where it can be well lit and easily
seen by patrolling police cars. The police department
has even voiced this opinion. We do not believe that
this location serves this purpose. The fact that it is
so close to a wall, not only threatens the homeowner, but
all sides cannot be clearly seen from the street;
This certainly poses a safety threat and a place for anyone
to hide.
We propose that a restroom; if one should have to be at this
park, be placed not only at the furthest location from any
existing home, it should be more centrally located
tc *he other parts of the park_
Last but not least, this location threatens to destroy
the value of several Mountain Meadows homes, which I
don't think is the intent on anyone's part. Not only
did all of us who border the park pay lot premiums, but
our dollars to buy our homes and the taxes we pay have
contributed to the ability to fund these parks. We
should have the right to voice our objections to what
is to surround us in this master planned community.
How can something as serious as putting a public restroom
in someone's backyard, be so abitrarily decided, without any
notification to the affected parties?
We will do whatever it takes to rectify this situation;
M
CA�yr.Ci S PAO-
REJADA
• + b
x,91
.OP
�ot�oSrEA Sewc- � • " .� I r
Li N - e,pQ ate. Zao I
SPA I
&TC '
415
C mss•+
� D�Ox1wATF
I 19AAW
/fa zoo
b , Z;—,po. T.
fir
r,