Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1991 0515 CC REG ITEM 08FMOORPARK 799 Moo-park Avenue Mo �),,4 M E M O P :' TO ''he Honorable Ci_t:.{ FROM: Susan CauldwelA _Xs,: l� DATE: May 9, 1991 I 1 i O% E s F TE 11� (',al "Ornia 93021 J11 )1 1991 A( J:ON: By st.:ir?t to the City Manager SUBJECT: Accepting Engineer'; Report: for AD85 -1 and Setting the Public Hearing On February 6, 1991, the City Counci ordered the preparation of an engineer's report (to M provided inder separate cover) for the City's Parks Maintenance Assessment ")istrict (AD85 -1). The district was created in 1985, and assessments have been levied in the following fiscal years: 85/86, 86/ ','7, 89/90, and 90/91. The City Council must annually act to levy t,e assessments. The FY 91/92 proposed assessment foT (A summary budget is attached.) single - family home is $27.56. Th, includes Community Center expenses maintenance of Campus Canyon Park included in the FY 90/91 budget. i s-ingl e- family home is $39.00 '1e FY 90/91 assessment for a proposed budget for FY91/92 r)f $6( ,000 and a full year's �itrl �r of these items were The Streets and Highways Code requires a public hearing prior to the Council's consideration of the a- ;sessment levy. The purpose of the public hearing is to hear prote=sts *o the proposed assessment. The next available public hearing dite is ,Tune 5, 1991. In prior years the Council has c :,nsidered the assessment levy during its review of the proposed annual budget. The detailed budget for AD85 -1 will be present:ec` -t that time. Staff Recommendations 1. Adopt Resolution 91 -759 appro,Inq the engineer's report for AD85 -1 for the fiscal year comr ,nc i nq Tilly 1, 1991 and ending June 30, 1992. 2. Adopt Resolution 91 -760 declar rig make certain changes and to orter AD85 -1 for the fiscal year comm�ync June 30, 1992; and fixing the b' at 7:00 p.m. PAUL W LAWRASON JR BERNARDO M PE SGOTT MO N''l, ; F Mayor Mayor 'ro Te! Goun( IrT)- the Council's intention to the annual assessments for .Lnq Tuly 1, 1991 and ending c t! gar °inq for June 5, 1991 E iALLE', JF JOHN E WOZNIAK 0uncdrnern,1 ' GOUnCilmember RESOLUTION NO. 91_- 59 I A RESOLUTION OF THE 'ITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIF APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT, FOR "PARKS 'AINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -85- FOR THE FISCAL YE,�R CO.MM.ENCING JULY 11, 11 U',D ENDING JUNE 30, 199?. WHEREAS, by Resolution No. ) -73t., t }7e City Council ordered the City Manager to cause to be prepa- ;n(ji_neer's Report in accordance with Article '1, '; apt r 1, Pazt < , t Of c.h +a C 3lifcrnia Streets and Highways C:)de, an<y WHEREAS, pursuant to said Re Dlut: ion. the Engineer's Report was filed with the City Clerk on the 15 d,ty o` May, 1991; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk nas submitted the report to the City Council and the City Council has nc re-i_ewed and examined the report as so submitted, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY ( sUNCIL ()F THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS SECTION 1. The Engineer s Report for "PARKS MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -85 -1" fc the fiecal year commencing July 1, 1991 and ending June 30, 1992 prepa Azad pursuant to Resolution No. 91 -738 filed with the City Clerk on th4 15,:h day of May, 1991 is hereby approved. SECTION 2. That said Engin + -er':s Report may be further modified or changed, pursuant to the pre•),i!, nS Of aection 22630 of the Streets and Highways Code. SECTION 3. The City Cleric i l _per, Lfy to the adoption of this resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _ da} r, 1991. Paul W. Lawrason Jr., Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk (SEAL) 895250.per RESOLUTI I NC,. 4 1 -760 A RESOLUTION OF T1,.E CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO MAKE CERTAIN CHANGES AND TO ORDER THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT' FOP THE "PARKS MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTR:;'T NO. AD -85 -1" FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ,Oi'. 'i:NCING rULY 1, 1991 AT:n ENDING JUNE: _:) 1992 PURSUANT TO THE LANDSCAPING AND -,GH "!,]:NG ACT OF 1972; AND FIXING A Ti' 'F V 1 ?" SCE FOR HEARING C)PIT' • "TO''1S Ti'_, WHEREAS, pursuant to t;ie rOvisicccs of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 ", being Di. .sicn 1i, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of "'i fcrnia, the City Council of the City of Moorpark by its Resolution 91 -738, proposed to make certain changes to the "PARKS MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -85 -1" and to extend the improvements speci ied in said district for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1991 arid r- ding Jur�e 30, 1992; and WHEREAS, by said Resolut_.oc; ro. 91 - -�38, the City Council ordered the City Manager to cause to be F epared an Engineer's Report, pursuant to Article 4, Chapter 1, Pa-t. Divi3ion 15 of said Streets and Highways Code; and WHEREAS, the Engineer's RE�paa was prepared and filed, and the same was approved by the City Counri r. Resolution No. 91 -759; th 15th day of May, 1991, by NOW, THEREFORE, THE CI'CY 'OUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOIL(A SECTION 1. That the public , ter,3st. and convenience require and it is the intention of the City Cou .il of the City of Moorpark to make certain changes to the "Parks am Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -85 -1" consisting of a sing].e -y -,aide district for the maintenance and improvement of parks and recce '.ional facilities within the City and to order the extension of parks d recreational facilities within the City and to order the extens:ic %r of the annual assessment for said district for the fiscal year comme_'.incJ Juiy 1, 1991 and ending June 30, 1992, pursuant to the Landscaping cnd Lighting Act of 1972, and to levy and collect assessments for sc.ct larks maintenance and improvement in accordance with said Act. SECTION 2. That said parka aaintenance assessment district shall specifically include the park tes with all improvements located therein, described by and hereto;( e included within "Parks Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -85 -2" SECTION 3. That the forey ,ng described work is to be located within said Assessment District t.ne boundary of which is more particularly described on a maF (r file in the City Clerk's office, and entitled "Boundary Map, City cf ° orpark Parks Maintenance Assessment District No. AD- 85 -1 ", filed in *a )ffice )f the City Clerk on the 15th day of May, 1991. SECTION 4. That the contem...ated maintenance and improvement of parks and recreational facilities„ n 1.he .pinion of said City Council, is of benefit to, and the said Cit: Council hereby makes the expense of the said maintenance and improveme s chargeable upon, the district. SECTION 5. Reference is here y made to the report of the Engineer on file with the City Clerk and ;per. to inspection, for a full and detailed description of the i -r -overnent 3, the boundaries of the Assessment District and any zones E. herein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels ( land within the District. SECTION 6. Notice is heret � given that on the 5th day of June, 1991, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., it the Council Chambers of the City Hall of said City, located at 799 Me rpark Avenue, Moorpark, any and all persons having any objections to :he work or extent of the assessment district may appear and show caul why said work should not be done or carried out or why said district ftouLd not be extended for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1991 and e 'ing June 30, 1992. Protests must be in writing, and must be filed ;y Frct)(rty owner with the City Clerk prior to the conclusion of the h , io1C anc such protest shall state all grounds of the objection and Yu co tji s description sufficient to i:lentify the Pr: -)p- rty. SEC'T'ION 7. All the jo trere in proposed shall be done in accordance with the Landscaping .i a ,- ,- :_ght_ng Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets" ncl liigl, ways Code of the State of California. SECTION 8. The City Clerk s all cause notice of the hearing to be given by causing the Resolution r) Intention to be published and mailed in the manner required by Par?: of Dir.sion 15 of the Streets and Highways Code. SECTION 9. The City Clerk ilia L certify to the adoption of this resolution. PASSED AND ADOPTED this tav of 1991. Paul W. Lawrason Jr., Mayor City Clerk (SEAL) 895626.per Parks A °sessment District AD -85 — - - - -- -- -- -1 — - -- _. -. — - -- -- F'-' 19 y 1 f 19 9 2 -- -- ... - .. *t FIWANICAL - -- SUI "AR-Y Personnel - - - - -_ __ Comm . Cnt. $ 3 0 ' 6 3 Parks= , . _ :Sub -total $135,256 f0 - -- 4 L—e i2os,o0o $4 800 : ...___ Sub -total $335,450 Sub -total $47 00 77 6 er FY -- - - - -_ = » «35,000} '-•-- -- --- -_— Peach Hill Revenue -- ($4,500; _ -- _ _ Comm. Cnt.Rev - - - - - -- :Sub -total -- ($16 500} _- - - - - -- _ ... - -- - - - -- -- TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE FUNDED — -- BY DISTRICT FY 1991 - - - - -- - - - - -- $419,206 CITY OF MOORPARK PARK NAINTENANCE 01SIRICI AO -85 -t Y 9L/92) PARK MAINTENANCE FORMULA USE DESCRIPTION 6 RESIDENTIAL VACAMT I SIN8LE FAMILY, LEVEL 1 2 MOBILE HOME 1 RESIDENTIAL INCOME 4 RESIDENTIAL INCOME, 2 -4 UNITS APFRTACRTS (S+ UM1T3 6 SINGLE FAMILY, LEVEL 2 9 MOBILE NONE S TRAILER PARK; 1N COW RCIAL VACANT 11 RETAIL STORES, SIMBLE STORY 12' STORE i OFFICE (CONIINATION) 15 SHOPPIM6 CENTERS (NEI6HBORHOOO) 16 SHOPPING CENTERS (REIIOMAI) 17 OFFICE BUILDING (1 STORY) 18 OFFICE STRRES (MULTI - STORY) 19 RETAIL STORES (MULTI STORY) 21 RESTAURANTS i COCKTAIL LOUM6f 24 BANKS, SAVINGS i LOANS 25 SERVICE STATIONS 26 AUTO SALES, REPAIR 31 INDUSTRIAL VACANT LAND 31 LIGHT AAMUFACTURING 32 WAREHOUSING 33 INDUSTRIAL CONDOS, CO -OPS, PUO S 38 RINfRAL PROCESSING 44 TRUCK CORPS 46 PASTURE (PEBNAMT) 48 POULTRY 49 FLOWERS, SEED PRODUCTION 51 ORCRAROS 53 FIELD CORPS, ORY 54 PASTURE OF 6RAZE,oRY 55 FEED LOTS 57 TREE FARMS 61 THEATER 69 PARKS 71 INSTITUTIONAL VACANT LAND 71 CHURCHES, CONVENT, RECTORY 12 SCHOOLS 71 COLLEGES 78 PUILIC ILOGS.,FIREHOUSES, MUSEUNS,ETC. 29 FLOOD CONTROL II MISCELLANEOUS VACANT LAND 91 UTILITY WATER COMPANY 13 PETROIEUN i 6AS E U,E I i i i 1 1 1 1 L 9 ANNUAL ASSESSMENT 1,11 39.'1 +1.89 29.25 29,25 2'J.2� 39.9! 2 ?,2i 211.54 211.54 711.81 2,1!5.4# 111.54 421.19 421.18 211.54 211.54 211.54 71.18 1,11 842.16 281.12 211.54 214,54 141,96 141.36 141.36 141.36 141.36 141.36 141.36 141.36 141,36 141.36 1.1! 1.11 it 1.11 1.11 1.1# 1,11 8.11 1.lR 11.18 805 729 6210:= 4/ J PER UNIT PER UNIT PER UAIT PER SPACE PER PARCEL PER PARCEL PER PARCEL r f 605 85 WATER RIGHTS, PUMAS 88 816HWAYS i STREETS i 0.1# 41 UTILITY EDISON i 1.11 81 TELEPHONE i.ai 94 UNOEDICAIED N NNUNITY COCO 6FYFtOPNFVT 35 STATE PROPERITY s; M NI Cl(i PROPERTY 1.ii 39 EXEMPT I.li � i.il Lit lC,tiT !< Rf1Cti S 'y 14, 1991 ..a J , M5 529 U2 %0 TtF� yr 2/13 DRAFT ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF MOORPARK PARKS MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD-8!5 ., 1. LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 2972 PREPARED BY: DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES 147( S. VALLEY VISTA DRIVE S UIlE 225 DlAy )ND BAR, CA 91765 Section 1 �f =ction 2 Section 3 Section 4 Section 5 TLUE__OF . c od, TNTJ Authority for Repo]- Description of imprc7 !ment to be Maintained Assessment Roll Estimate of Cost Method of Assessment Appendix A - Parks Maintenance Formk ,a Appendix B - Budget Estimate Appendix C - Boundary Map Appendix D - Assessment Roll Appendix E - Resolutions Appendix F - Rebate Procedure r'aa 1 1 2 2 2 T I3Y" f)w 1 Gfff FRP\(' i & A ,SO( 3 4 ?7P1! CITY OF Mt. R PA R K E119ineer ' �epc�rt Ira and Lic,l 't f 1972 For Fiscal yeaj 1441 -1992 SECTION 1 AUTHORITY FOR REPORI rt05 529 8270:f 4,/In This report is Prepared pursuant City Council action taken at their regular meeting of May, 1991 extend this District for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 199 and ending June 30, 1992 in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, "Landscaping Act of 197211, being i,art 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Ccd This report is an update of all ;isting City -wide Assessment District. The purpose for the dis °_rict is to provide operating funds for the continued maintenance and improvements of existing and planned City operated public pa �s. SECTI_ ON 2 DESCRIPTION OF HE___T1,1 PROVEMEHTS TO BE MAINTAINED The following City Parks are to be I.-lintained under this District effective July 1, 1991: CAMPUS PARK PAUL GRIFFIN SR. PARK COMMUNITY CENTER MONTE VISTA NATURE PARK GLENWOOD PARK PEACH HILL PARK NORTH VILLAGE PARK LA COLONIA In addition, the City also owns addj,,_ional unimproved acreage for park purposes designated on the attached boundary map as locations 2 and 6. Only minimal cost f'oj weed control, if any, is anticipated for these two locations n fisc� =_1 year 1991 - 1992. The maintenance and improvement of a_ia above mentioned parks shall include but not he limited to the fo Lowing 1. Mowing and edc i ng of a l I -f a r r" s SEAT BY C DR I CMT FRE \(-11 & I - ?7P%l W)70:7: . Litter pi(--},up 3. Weedinq as required cap, an a basis on nonthly, 4. Irrigation Jis required 10. Installing park or recreational .improvements, including but not to drainage, sidewalks, land preparation and the maintenance and servicing f Said improvements. SECTION -3 ASSESSMENT RQLL All parcels of real property affected are listed on the "Assessment Roll ", Exhibit A, which will be on fle in City Hall with the City Clerk, and is made a part hereof by reference. These parcels are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code which are on file in the office of the Ventura County Assessor in the County Government Center Administration Building, 800 S. Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California and which are also made a part hereof by reference. SECTION 4 ESTIMATE OF COST The estimated costs of operating thf proposed District are shown in Appendix "B" of this Report. SICTION 5 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1472, in section 22573, states that "The net amount to be assesso:-i upon the lands within an assessment district may be apportic. -ied by any formula or method which fairly distributes the new amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the mprovenents." I._, nq o:� ail vc;�z c.;� :_�; each species requires. ¢�. Pruring so s `o rjc.': z ba: th na'..ura1 grcwt cczar , vt+_ _ is .ics of th p . Y 7. Cleaning existing facilit., t:�s to to clean and free of all debris. Minor repairs sh .l be needed. S. Vector control at the fir:•t. indication of existence. S'. Maintaining- lights, plal�c: , uncl f-!r_.f:ipment, pl aycourts and public restrooms. 10. Installing park or recreational .improvements, including but not to drainage, sidewalks, land preparation and the maintenance and servicing f Said improvements. SECTION -3 ASSESSMENT RQLL All parcels of real property affected are listed on the "Assessment Roll ", Exhibit A, which will be on fle in City Hall with the City Clerk, and is made a part hereof by reference. These parcels are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code which are on file in the office of the Ventura County Assessor in the County Government Center Administration Building, 800 S. Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California and which are also made a part hereof by reference. SECTION 4 ESTIMATE OF COST The estimated costs of operating thf proposed District are shown in Appendix "B" of this Report. SICTION 5 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1472, in section 22573, states that "The net amount to be assesso:-i upon the lands within an assessment district may be apportic. -ied by any formula or method which fairly distributes the new amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the mprovenents." I'hc method and formula of benef i4: - .F)xead recognizes that every property within the City of Moorpark, -ene f-i t s " :rom pu? ?.i.c parks and recreatioii facil l t- je:s . The method of spreading maintenan( -e Est , i based upon the "people ,ise" attribute(I t-) each 7.anc; use .r��' ire _ .� city. Thi: method wlas chosen because benefit r_eceivec.-. �y F wing park facilities is directly proportionate to the nunbc o people generated by each land use. Recogniziiog that residen° ail 'land uses within the City derive: a higher degree of benefit ti in non - residential land uses, the formula was subdivided into two main groups, with residential land uses contributing in 75% of the ssessment and non - residential uses being assessed for the remainin( 25 °'s of the maintenance costs. The benefits to residential land ttse: are clear. The residents of the City utilize the parks during tsei" leisure hours. Benefits to non - residential property incline such items as offering employees the opportunity to utilizo :l the parks during lunch time and after hours, as well as provicing an aesthetic environment which attracts potential employees i ,t,) the area. The "people use" factors utilized _�.n ie ass -ssment district spread formula are shown in Appendix 'All The City Council approved a rebate procedure for disadvantaged citizens on November 1989. The pr zedure shall be followed as described in Appendix E. In conclusion, it is our opinion that the assessments within Parks Maintenance Assessment District No. AD -85 -1 are apportioned by a formula that fairly distributes the riet cost to each lot or parcel in accordance with the benefits that are rec.-eived. ENGINEER'S REPORT SUBMITTED BY: Danny Chow DWIGHT FRENCH & .ASSOCIATES 3 ,L17 BY DWIC;tiT FRhCfi .APPENDII 605 599 APPEND.1 A. C T , Parks Maintenance Asst rent District Nei. Landscaping and Ligf inq Act of 1972 T k:._ Parks Mainteria..T::e Eormulta Use Code Descrit�t on �Ieople Annual use _ Assessment 0 Residential Vacant $ 0.00 -L Single Family - .00 $ Level 1 39.00 2 Mobile Home $ 0.00 3. Condo .00 p er $ 29.25 Per unit unit 4 Residential Income (2 -4 Units) •00 per $ 29.25 per unit unit 5 Apartments (5 +) 00 p e� $ 29.25 unit per unit 6 Single Family - Level 2 00 p e $ 39.00 9 Mobile Home and Trailer Parks 00 per $ 29.25 per ,spree space 10 Commercial Vacant $ 0.00 11 Retail Stores, Single 00 $ 210.54 story per pat: e1 -' paxo,�- 12 Store & office (combination) W $ 210.54 15 Shopping Centers 1 W $ 701.80 (Neighborhood) Use Poo 101 Annual rode Desc iption Use Assessment 16 Shopping Centers 30.00 $2,105.40 (Regional) 17 Office 3. 0) Y 210 . 5, z1 (1 Story) 18 office Stores 6.00 421.08 per (Multi- Story) rc el parcel 19 Retail Stores 6.00 p r $ 421.08 per (Multi - story) p ° rc,c.I pares 21 Restaurants & 3.00 $ 210.54 Cocktail Lounge 24 Banks, Savings & 3.00 $ 210.54 Loans 25 Service Stations 3.00 $ 210.54 26 Auto Sales, Repair 1.00 $ 70.18 30 Industrial Vacant 0 $ 0.00 Land 31 Light Manufacturing 12.00 $ 842.16 32 Warehousing 4.00 $ 280.72 33 Industrial Condos, 3.0(� $ 210.54 Co -Ops, PUD's 38 Mineral Processing 3.0o $ 210.54 44 Truck Crops 2.00 $ 140.36 46 Pasture (Permanent) 2.o( $ 140.36 48 Poultry 2.0C $ 140.36 40 Flowers, Seed 2.0( $ 1.40.36 Production 51 Orchards 2.00, $ 140.36 53 Field Crops, Dry 2.00 $ 140.36 54 Pasture of Graze, 2.0C $ L40.36 Dry 55 11 1 Feed Lots ?_0G $ 140.36 57 Tree FarmF, '-,F-'T FAY : DK I GHT I-RF \CH ti0� 5 ?3 8?70 : =jCi Use Co e UQSCription P*�O� e lJse Annual ` As 61 Theater 2.00 S 140.36 69 Parks (; 0 70 Institutional Vacant 0 $ 0 Land 71 Churches, Convent, a 0 Rectory 72 Schools i� $ 0 73 Colleges 0 $ 0 78 Public Bldgs., �� $ 0 Firehouses, Museums, Etc. 79 Flood Control p $ 0 80 Miscellaneous Vacant 0 $ 0 Land 81 Utility Water Company 0 $ 0 83 Petroleum & Gas 1,06) $ 0 86 Water Rights, Pumps $ 0 88 Highways & Streets $ 0 91 Utility Edison $ 0 92 Telephone fi $ 0 93 S.P.R.R. C $ 0 94 Undedicated $ Community Condo 0 Development 95 State Property 0 $ 0 96 County Property 0 $ 0 97 City Property 0 S 0 99 Exempt 0 S 0 Actual Assessment amount may vary °c epancies between use codes and actual property uses. �F�T f31' nK I C HT f- P,[- \(`H & A"So( I ; +1 f1V APPENDIX "B" CITY OF MO RPARK. Parks Maintenance Asses ;meait District No. AD- 8cz- Landscape and Light rig Act of 1972 BUDGET EST ' MA`i'E Fiscal Year 1 '91-1992 Park Sites Engineering Costs Maintenance and Operation Personnel. Costs Peach Hill Park Revenue Community Center Revenue Carryover Total Amount to be Funded by District (FY 1991 -1992) 805 51 '3 81 10:-11'1:' $ 330,650.00 4,800.00 135,256.00 (4,500.00) (12,000.00) (35,000.00) $ 419,206.00 BY :D«I(,HT I RC \C "il _ 1 4 :) I : I .i: ' MaY 14, 1991 FINAL ENGINEER'S REPORT CITY OF MOORPARx 805 =i20 8-970:f 2'17 v DRAFT LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DTBTRICT NO. AD --88 -2 LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 PREPARED BY DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES 1470 S. VALLEY VISTA DRIVE SUITE 225 ParFM0llD BAR, CA 91765 TABLE OF ( (JNTENTS Section 1 Authority for Repo: Section 2 Description of Impr V(�ment. to be Maintained section 3 Assessment Roll Section 4 Method of Formula r (lost Spread Section 5 Estimate of Cost Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F Appendix G Appendix H Street Lighting Formu a Table 1 Landscape Formula - `1 _able 2 Assessment Summary - able 3 Budget Estimate Boundary Map Assessment Roll Resolutions Rebate Procedure 1 3 3 4 �s0> -)23 8270:f 3/17 1 CITY (: F h °:)ORPARF Engineor I . Report.. Parks Maintenance Assd.a.ssment District No. AD -8 _�, Landscape and Lf.gt ° ing Act of 1972 For Fiscal 'Ye. I: 1991-1992 _SECTION 1 AUTHORITY FOR REPOPT This report is prepared pursuant °_o City Council action taken at their regular meeting of May, 1991 to extend this District for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1991 . and ending June 3o, 1992 in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, "Landscaping Act of 197211, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California streets and Highways Cc, je The District will provide elect.ri ::.al energy for public lighting facilities and for operation and maintenance of public lighting within the city. In addition,, the District will provide for installation and /or maintenance oj' public landscaping within the public right -of -way. SECTION 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMEM TO BE MAINTAINED This Report covers the period of July 1, 1991 through June 3p, 1992. An updated report is prepared each year to reflect updated annual costs and changes in parc:el•zation, The improvements to be maintained City -owned in this District include all and Southern Li California ghts as well as all medians Edison (S.c.E.) -owned street and rights -of -way within the boundari+_.. street trees within public of the city. Lighting maintenance shall include, costs, removal, but is :not limited to, energy repair, replacement standards, poles, bulbs, fixtures -, or relocation of light <i Of S.C.E. owned lights as defined j . a:1 appurtenances_ Servicing Sect;.on and Highways Code shall be f. 4z rii_�; 22538 of the Streets -d by a he Edison Company or i t3 st?CCes: or: Southern California authorized by the Public �iil it_ie > (..- r �1� : servicing shall be as anj . state Maintenance of Ci ty ownf�d l fight i r <3 .i<,ri of California. T by the City. r �` (( Tents shall be furnished Landscape maintenance shall inc ii e, tau'_ is not limited to, watering, fertilizing, mowing, w, d control, shrubbery, tree removal and pruning, removal and -efdac +anent of dead growth, maintenance of irrigation faci]iti < -rd rer necossary work. rr rr rR �ci � aS - x B 529 8270: 5/17 Hddi_tion, the cost to maint i ^i mpuovt-d -as within an easement i1I. bc? bowie be owners within t1 it pro-1,-!c' These easement areas 1. Tract No. 2851 Maintenance costs associated with landscaping in the Ventura County Flood Control Easement and portions of the interior tract entry areas. the obligation upon these 73 lots is pursuant to -i condition of development. 2. Tract No. 2865 Cost for maintenance of specific landscape areas within the tract, including landscaping at Christian Barrett & Spring Roads; Tierra Rejada landscaping, and Peach Hill Road landscaping on east side between Christian Barrett and Tierra Rejada Road<:. The obligation upon the lots within this tract i- pursuant to a condition of development. 3. Tract No. 3032 Maintenance costs associated with an entry monument at Buttercreek Road and Leas Angeles Avenue. This cost to be spread to the 265 lo-s within the tract. 4. Tract No. 3274 Maintenance costs associated with landscape areas along Williams Ranch Road parkway adjacent to Peach Hill drain channel and Edison entries within PC -3. This cost will be borne by the 220 lot; within the tract. 5. Tract NOS. 3019, 3525 Maintenance costs associated with landscaping the Tierra Rejada Road slope and parkway areas and parkway on the west side of Peach Hill Road between Williams Ranch and Tierra Rejada. Roads within Tract Nos. 3019 and 3525. The cost is to be spread tc the 224 lots within the tracts. 6. Tract 3306 Cost for landscape az. -:::as within Tract 3306 at the westerly terminus of .r,rIewoac! street. The cost is t.o kye spread to the 22 +� i �_.l; i s L }:e trace- 7. Los Angeles Avenue Parka ,y Maintenance costs ass<,ci _;teen with landscaping the parkway on the north side of Lo:. Angelc,s Avenue between Gabbert and Shasta will be born(:} I.,y all inr_ustrial lots northerly Of Los Angel es Avenuf. . -',;E\ 1, ELY Dot f GHT FKENCH , 'i AY— K T 1 1 -11 1 ` ECTZgt,l � ASSESSMENT ROI- 8U 5 5?9 c;`' ; - r;,1 All. parcels of real property aife ted are listed on the "Assessment Rol.l", Exhibit A, which will be ( n file in City Hall with the City Clerk, and is made a part hereof by reference. These parcels are 3k more particularly described in naps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code which are on file in the office of the Ventura county .?assessor in the County Government Center Administration Building, 300 S. Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California and which are also zn.v 4� a part hereof by reference. SECTION 4 ESTIMATE OF ('OST The Landscaping and Lighting Act )f 1972, in Section 22573, states that "The net amount to be assessed upon the lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the new amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits t be received by each such lot or parcel from tie improvements." Lighting The primary benefits of street lighting are for the convenience, safety and protection of people and the security or protection of property, property improvements and goods. The intensity or degree Of illumination provided can have a bearing on both_ The single family home - Level 1 has been selected as the base unit for the spread of assessments. By definition, the single family home - Level 1 is a single family home located on a street that has existing street lights. A factor Of 1.00 has been assigned to the base unit, which is composed of benefit factors which correspond to the following types of benefi People Use - People relate(! ;enefits 0.50 Security Benefit - Property I.rotect -ion 0.25 Intensity - Degree of illaml l it ion 0.25 1.00 Parcels in other land use catego -- were then rated by comparison With the basic unit. (See Table d People Use - Pec�Ple relae�. rlEt i.` 1- Reduction in night accj(c!. ,t:_3 and Intendant human misery. 2- Reduced vulnerability 1, of darkness. c;- ,Lminal assault during hourry �i f;Y�Dti�IGi;T FPE \CH 4 17 3. Promotion o` husinc�; e ,3ti<Z during evening hours. 4. Increased safety on is <Ind ~� ignways. Security Benefit -- Property rol:ect ion 1. Reduction in vandali-srr and other criminal acts, and damage to improvement.F 2. Reduction in burglaries. Intensity Intensity or degree of illumi 3,ation provided on streets varies with type of street, date of installation and the use of the property adjacent thereto Landscaping The landscaping element of the spread formula recognizes that all properties within the City benefit from the maintenance of the landscaping within public rights -of -way and easements. These benefits include aesthetic enjoyment, creation of a placement living and working environment, an increase in general property values, improved safety resulting from a regular tree trimming program and improved street sweeping capabilities resulting from trimming trees which may otherwis(� interface with street sweeping operations. Because of the general benefit received, the cost is spread equally along each parcel i the City. This amount is shown in the appendix. Rebate The City Council approved a rebate procedure for disadvantaged citizens. The procedure shall be as described in Appendix G. SECTION 5: COST ESTIMATE The estimated costs of operating :he District are shown Appendix "D" of this Report. The costs attributed to lands cap- ,,g anci the costs attributed to lighting will be separately ap��ai a,tE.c, ,:.cording to the formula, and added together to constitute t')cy t,; tai assnssment for each parcel. Conclusion TT -n conclusion, it is our opinic. that- the assessments within Lighting Maintenance Assessment Ldstri.ct No. AD -84 -2 are apportioned by a formula that i_ai 11.,' di!�°iributes the net cost in accordance with the benefits that ra received. ENGINEERIS REPORT SUBMITTED BY: DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES �mo:z E'ct r, California -,E.-\7 FIY:DW[CiffT f-PF\(-ff APPENDIX 8/17 •T'1T fay IM I WT APPENI i.X "A" CITY OF MOORPARK Lighting Maintenancc Assessment District AD-e;4­2 Lighting and Land ;cape Act of 1972 Tab E:� 1 Street Lighting Formula Use People Lighting Total Code Description Use Intensity Security Units 80-D :1?9 8270:± 9.17 n Annual Assessment 0 Residential Vacant 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 $5.96 1 Single Family - Level 1 0.50 0..") 0.25 1.00 $23.84 2 Mobile Home 0.00 0.4:;.� 0.00 0.00 $0.00 3 Condo (Per Unit) 0.50 {?., 0.25 1.00 $23.84 4 Residential Income (2 -4 Units) 0.50 Ci. ., 0.25 1.00 $23.84 (Per Unit) 5 Apartments (5+) 0.50 c,., 4 0..20 0.75 $17.88 Per Unit 6 Single Family- 0.50 0.05 0.20 0.75 $17.88 Level 2 9 Mobile Home & Trailer Park 0.50 0.0 17.20 0.75 $17.88 (Per Space) 10 Commercial Vacant 0.00 0.03 0..25 0.25 $5.96 Land 11 Retail Stores, 2.00 $ .. {3 1_..00 4.00 $95.36 Single Story (Per Parcel) 12 Store & Office 2.00 1.0 1..00 4.00 $95.36 Combination 15 Shopping Centers 4.00 50 6.50 $154.96 (Neighborhood) 16 13hoppi r , CeYnt:cr: n . 17 Office Building 1.00 1_..'F, .00 3.00 $71.52 (1 Story) 18 office Buildirag3 2.60 00 4.00 $95.36 (t- fulti- Story) (Per Parcel) 19 Retail Stores (Multi- Story) 2.00 1..0 _.00 4.00 $95.36 (Per Parcel) 21 Restaurants & 3.00 Cocktail Loungcf ; . :i00 , 500 $119.20 �� Banks, savings & L Loans 1.00 1 . {i . C'0 3.00 $71.52 z� s�fvicc. ,; tatlow, ;_ ... _00 )0 4.00 $95.36 Lw t f(T FRENOi 4 a SSo ( . 91 a . ,`� 805 529 8270 : =1 r' 17 r.uto Sales, Refer, lr 2-00 1 . n3 4.00 $�' "E >torage, Rental ail) industrial land 0.00 0.27 0.25 $'- 96 Vacant 31 Light 32 Manufacturing Warehousing 3.00 2.00 1.0 L..00 5.00 $119.20 33 Industrial Condos, 2.00 l.0 L..00 4.00 $95.36 Co -Ops, PUD's „ 1.50 5.00 $119.20 38 44 Mineral Processing Truck Crops 1.00 .1 c L .00 3.00 $71.52 46 Pasture (Permanent) 0.50 0.2 «_25 1.00 $23.84 48 Poultry 0 .50 0.2 1 .00 $23.84 49 Flowers, Seed 0.25 1.00 $23.84 51 Products Orchards 0.50 0.2 0.25 1.00 $23.84 53 Field Crops, Dry 0.50 0.50 0.2 0 2 ` 0.25 1.00 $23.84 54 Pasture of Graze, - 0.25 1.00 $23.84 55 Dry Feed Lots 0.50 0.50 0.2" 0.25 1.00 $23.84 57 Tree Farms 0.50 0..2 0.2, 0_25 1.00 $23.84 61 Theater 3.00 1.. of 0.25 1.00 $23.84 69 Parks 0.00 0.0( :1.00 5.00 $119.20 70 Institutional 0.100 0.00 $0.00 71 Vacant Churches, Convent 0.00 0.0( 0.25 0.25 $5.96 72 Rectory Schools 0.00 0.0c 0.2.5 0.25 $5.96 73 Colleges 0.00 0`00 0.00'. 0.00 0.00 $0.00 78 Public Bldgs., 0.00 o.0c 0 0.00 0.00 $0.00 Museums, Firehouses, uC 0.00 0'00 $0.00 Etc. 79 80 Flood Control Misc- Vacant Lots 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.25 $0.00 81 Utility Water 0,00 0 '00 0 25 0.25 $5.96 83 Company Petroleum & Gas 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0-00 $0.00 86 Water Rights, Pum s 0.00 0. .50 0.00 0.50 2.00 $47.68 88 Highways & Streets 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 91 Utility - Edison 0.00 0.©® 0.00 0.00 $0.00 92 Telephone 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 93 S.P.R.R. a.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 94 Undedicated 0.00 0.00 $0.00 Community Areas 95 (Condos) State Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 °0© 0'00 $0.00 rib C Cunt / } Property C,G {��' C71� 0.0C! ��' 97 City Property 0.01 0' `�C ?�o 0.00 fi $0.00 99 Exempt P 0. 0 ) 0. ",r 0 ��)�� 0.00 $0.00 ). ;� 0.00 $0.00 _�0n( _7� =11.17 ail , ? - t Orr CITY OF " 0OPPARY Lighting Maintenance Assessment District Number ?D -8a -2 Lighting and Landscape Act. of 1972 Landscapc Formula The landscaping element of the spreac formula is calculated in accordance with the method described as follow= -: Total Annual Cost - $7.60 per oar-el Notes: 1. In addition to the above landscape charge, 73 lots within Tract No. 2851 are assessed an additional landscape cost for a Ventura county Flood Control Easement and portions of the interior tract entry areas. The additional cost per lot is $0.00. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a ,ondition of development. 2. In addition to the above landscape charge, 622 lots within Tract 2865 are assessed an additional landscape charge for the maintenance of parkways and Tierra Rejada Road slope and street scape areas within the tract. The additional cost per lot is $16.90. The obligation upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 3. In addition to the above landscape charge, 265 lots within Tract No. 3032 are assessed an additional landscape charge for the maintenance of an entry monument at Buttercreek Road and Los Angeles Avenue. The additio,Mal cost per lot is $10.24. 4. In addition to the above :Landscape charge, 220 lots within Tract No. 3274 area assessed an additional. landscape charge for the landscape for the maintenance of parkway areas along Williams Ranch Road and Edison entries within PC -3, The additional cost per lot is $24.78. The obli.gatior upon these lots is pursuant to a condition of development. 5. In addition to the above landscape charge, 224 lots within Tract Nos_ 3019 and 3525 are assc.,sed an additional landscaping charge for maintenance of Tierra RcJada Road slope and parkways and the parkway on the west side oil Tr.ach Hill Road between Williams Ranch and Tierra Rejad ; Rea&;. 1"i ads i onal cost per lot. is: � 94.62 The obl igatt ion capon tilessE > . i. : :, pursuant to a condition of development 6. In addition to, the above landscape charge, 22 lots within Tract No. 3306 are assessed an additional landscape charge for the maintenance of landscape area at the westerly terminus of Inglewood Street. The additional cost per lot is $63.45. The obligation upon these Lots is pursuant. 7 a condition of development. 7 • in addition to the above I eii, :sG,ipte charge, 91 lots northerly of- I,os Angeles Avc,ritie between ( ibb#�rt it d Shasta arc assessed on an additional landscaping ch.,.r<q. i c ) jiic ir = enance of the northside of Los LAnan tee Aven�ic� Parkwa ✓ , t E 3�1 i ' ; cnal cost P( xr lot is >7 . 91 . ">29 8270: "12/17 T T Ligtit ing Maintenai' c _. erg°= n istr.ict Al' - T,ightj_ng and 1.,an,] .app-. A t c)f 1972 Tit: a Assessateji Surma~ y Use LandscaE:,. "Aghting Total Code Description Assessmf t assessment Assessment 0 Residential $7.60 $5.96 $13.56 Vacant 1 Single Family- - Level 1 7.60 23.84 31.44 2 Mobile Home 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 Condo 7.60 13.84 31.44 Per Unit 4 Residential Income (2-4 Units 7.60 23.84 31.44 Per Unit 5 Apartments (5 +) 7.60 17.88 25.48 Per Unit 6 Single Family - Level 2 7.60 17.88 25.48 9 Mobile Home and 7.60 17.88 25.48 Per Space Trailer park 10 Commercial Vacant 7.60 5.96 13.56 Land 11 Retail Stores, 7.60 95.36 102.96 Single Story 12 Store & Office 7.60 95.36 102.96 Per Parcel Combination 15 Shopping centers 7.60 L54.96 162.56 (Neighborhood) 16 Shopping Centers 7.60 154.96 162.56 (Regional) 17 Office Building 7.60 -,,'1.52 79.22 (1- Story) 18 Office Building 7.60 95.36 102.96 Per Parcel (Multi - Stare) 19 Retail SLc ae > 7.60 5 . = G 102.96 Per Parcel (Multi -Stony 2i. Restaurants & 7.60 't 9.20 126.80 Cocktail Lounges 24 Banks, Savings & Leans 7.60 71.52 79.12 25 service Stations 7.60 95.36 102.96 t<- • mot.; f•,. ) 1 _ . I'1' Landsc.i: Lighting Assessor- ,t Ass= ssment rWl) 5109 8`?70:f13/17 Total Assessment ,f Auto Sales, Repair 7.60 95.36 102.96 Storage, Rental, . 30 Industrial. Land 7.60 5.96 13.56 Vacant 31 Light Manufacturing 7.60 119.20 126.80 32 Warehousing 7.60 95.36 102.96 33 Industrial Condos, Co -Ops, PUD's 7.60 119.20 126.80 38 Mineral. Processing 7.60 71.52 79.12 44 Truck Crops 7.60 23.84 31.44 46 Pasture (Permanent) 7.60 23.84 31.44 48 Poultry 7.60 23.84 31.44 49 Flowers, Seed 7.60 23.84 31.44 Production 51 Orchards 7.60 23.84 31.44 53 Field Crops, Dry 7.60 23.84 31.44 54 Pasture of Graze, 7.60 :23.84 31.44 Dry 55 Feed hots 7.60 23.84 31.44 57 Tree Farms 7.60 23.84 31.44 61 Theater 7.60 119.20 226.80 69 Parks 0.00 0.00 0.00 70 Institutional 7.60 5.96 13.56 Vacant Land 71 Churches, Convent, 7.60 5.96 13.56 Rectory 72 schools 0.00 0.00 0.00 73 Colleges 0.00 0.00 0.00 78 Public Bldgs., Museums, Firehouses, Etc. 0.00 0.00 0.00 79 Flood Control 0.00 0.00 0.00 80 Misc. Vacant Land 7.60 5.96 13.56 81 Utility Water Co. .0.00 0.00 0.00 83 Petroleum & Gas 7.60 47.68 55.28 86 Water Rights, Pumps 0.00 0.00 0.00 88 Highways & Streets 0.00 0.00 0.00 91 Utility - Edison 0.00 0.00 0.00 92 Telephone 0.00 0.00 0.00_ 93 S.P.R.R. 0.0(} 0.00 ().00 94 Undedicated Community Areas 95 State Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 96 County Property 0.00 0.00 0.00 97 City Froperi:.y 0.00 0.00 0.00 99 Exempt 0.00 C'.00 0.00 Actual assessment amounts may vary dice discr-epancies between use codes and actual property uses. -✓ r W` -Ac fro `i'Y f -F "PARK FJ,NU ",CA1'1NG, ANI) LIGHTi ',;> ASSESSMENT DISTRICT AD- s -2 BUDGET" I :.TIMATF FY 1') i/92 STREET LIGHTING $200,000.00 ZONES OF BENEFIT .1. Tract No, 2851 Interior Parkway & Flood Control. hannel 0 2. Tract No. 2865 Pacifica & Pardee 10,513.00 3. Tract No. 3032 Buttercreek & Peppermill 2,714.00 4. Tract No. 327 Williams Ranch Road 5,451.00 5. Tract No. 3019, 3025 warmington 21,195.00 6. Tract No, 3306 Glenhaven (Inglewood) 1,396.00 7. Los Angeles Avenue North Side Parkway 720.00 8. 'each Hill Drain 0 S LAB , "�°)TAL $ 41,989.00 84 ) 529 8",70:=11/17 �y/ 1 t -91 fiIj- 5�9 8270: #15'17 L .. Tract_ "'891: Campus Park & Col l i t S 5,456.00 2, Tract 41.70: Campus Park Median 2,154.00 3. Campus Park Median (Marq. to Jill, 6 II85.00 4. Parkways: Princeton 4,776.00 5. Medians: Princeton 4,763.00 6. Parkways: Poindexter /Sierra 1,371.00 7- Community Center Parkway 1,156.00 81 S/W Corner Spring Rd. & Peach HiL, 1,609.00 9. Tierra Rejada (N /O Harvester) 3,213.00 10. William Ranch Road Barrier 3,840.00 11. Tierra Rejada Medians (Harvester ,:D Brick ;e) 990.00 12. Tierra Rejada Medians (Edsn Esmnt. - :c ?eacti Hill) 5,590.00 13. Tierra Rejada Medians (Peach Hill, •..:o W/O Spring) 9,680.00 14. Peppar Tree Spraying 4,000.00 15. Tree Removal /Replacement 12,000.00 16. Tree Trimming 15,000.00 17. Weed Abatement. 3,000.00 18. Misc. Improvements 110,302.00 $195,785.00 ADMINISTRATION Engineering 4,978.00 Maintenance /Operations /Personnel- Cont i ncienc,�,, 29,626.00 SUBTOTAL: ' 38,064.00 FY 90/91 Carryover (153,542.00) GRAND TOTAL: - -- $322,296.00 a.f•-s.a.-� .r a= ^.- '.r,"R*"`" �:- ,._.K --, a � 4 - � 1 � tt�7 nY : [}K 1 CW FR E1i11 t ASS"- AF'f'� 'J K ,E_,, Appendix "F ", the Assessment Roll, `sows the assessment upon each lot or p<t rcel (approximately 8191 parcels) ithin this District and is on file in the office of the City Clerk and C.)unty Assessor. The Ventura County Assessor's office no longer lists p111b]L.c utility easements on the Assessor's Ru i I . rPt \028tinal.dc tiF'%,T BY:DWfCffT F-PF-%*(-Ii & j 6:,-7 0 APPPRI X "fill REBATE PP)CEDURE ELOISE BROWN Mayor BERNARDO M. PEREZ Mayor Pro Tern CLINT HARPER, Ph. D. Councilmember PAUL LAWRASON Councilmember SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilmember RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer MOORPARK MEMO k A N D U H TO: The Honorable City Counci FROM: Budget and Finance Committee DATE: November 1, 1989 SUBJECT: Procedures for Rebate c,f A sessments ll STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J. KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P. Director of Community Development R. DENNIS DELZEIT City Engineer JOHN V. GILLESPIE Chief of Police Pursuant to the Council's direction in July, 1989, the Budget and Finance Committee has developed proposed p�)cedures to implement rebates for the annual assessments for AD 84 -2 and A 8''i l The proposed procedures are as follc:.;. 1. Owner occupant with rebate or y cn property granted a homeowner's exemption. 2. Demonstrate that there is no t assessment(s) for which the reb 3. Gross family income may not t County median income; the moss must be presented to verify fam of the above, persons who fee exist and who meet other appli The City Councils Budget determination on all such Council oil nl l approved 4. Persons granted propel,,. Gorrsalves- Deukmejian- Petris presentation of proof of sup+ above, shall be eligible for r- x de 1 i.nqu incy on the property and the t.e - s r# >quested have been paid. creed two - thirds of the then current recent: state and federal tax return y income and family size. Regardless that Pec:ial hardship circumstances ,b: c r ter is may apply for a rebate. i ix cf. Committee shall make a confiAent:ial report to it assistance under the pi, rt} Tax Assistance Law upon s i r ri - 'rid meeting items 1 and 2, 799 Moorpark Avenue _ - - -- - (805) 529 686 The Honorable City Council November 1, 1989 Page 2 5. A rebate may be requested between January I and May 31 of any fiscal year for assessment due and 1, iyabIo daring that same fiscal year consistent with the above crig is No rebate will be granted for delinquent assessments paid curi aiv sfbsequent fiscal year. 6. Staff will issue press releas , conceiining the rebate process in January, April and July of each ,e:ai °Che rebate procedure will also be contained in the Engineer's I ;4or for both Assessment Districts. 7. Rebates of City -wide assessment, funded by the City's General Fun assessments will be funded by t District. 8910319 o; both Assessment Districts will be +tebates of special zone of benefit rspe<, -ive zone of benefit for that MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA City Council Meeting of 198j—' ACTION: