HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1991 0515 CC REG ITEM 08OITEM 8. 0.
MOORPARK
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864
TO: The Honorable Cis. Council
FROM: Susan Cauldw 1
sistant
DATE: May 9, 1991
�)ORPARK, CALIFORNIA
City Council Meeting
Of 199 l
ACTION:
ey --
to the City Manager
SUBJECT: Consider SB 208, kB 18651 SB 1238, and AB 652
The most recent League of Cities Bulletin contained several bills
which should be opposed by the
below. ity COUncil. They are described
SB 208 (Kopp) would restrict cc:;nfidential communication between
City Attorneys and City officia s. The author has amended this
bill several times, and it remains stalled in the Senate Judiciary
Committee. The most recent amendments would remove legal memos,
inquiries about potential conflicts (-)f .interest, and advice on the
legality of specific legislati_vc- optiorl from items which may be
kept confidential.
AB 1865 (Hauser) would require redevelopment agencies which provide
assistance to properties utilized for retail sales to share thirty
percent of the sales tax above a historical level with other cities
and the county if they have a pf,r capita income level below the
statewide average. This bill i_s Pne attempt to redistribute sales
tax receipts. The Governor's proposed budget also calls for
redistributing the growth in sales tax revenues on a more equitable
basis. This bill has been passed by the Assembly Revenue and
Taxation Committee and is curren,!y pending in the Assembly Ways
and Means Committee.
AB 1238 (Royce) This bill would -nandate the City to set variable
trash can rates. Unlike the current flat rate, this bill would
require residents to pay for each !:rash can that is set out. While
the City may need to adopt a variable can rate to achieve its AB
939 recycling goals, the decisic;F about whether to implement a
variable can rate should rest wit-, the City Council.
PAUL W LAWRASON JR BERNARDO M PEREZ
SCOT" Mot, ';;OMERY HOY JOHN E WOZNIAK
Mayor Mayor Pro Tem E TALLEY JR
Cc unc �I� - mb-r Councilmember
Councilmember
The Honorable City Council
May 9, 1991
Page 2
AB 652 (Wright) This bill would require the City, prior to
collecting fees for new development , to provide a written statement
that identifies fees on all new development and the specific
purpose or use of the funds. Non- compliance with the provisions of
AB 652 result in the development fees being classified as a special
tax, which is subject to a two - thirds vote of the electorate. AB
1600 already requires the City to provide information regarding the
purpose and use of developer fees. This bill imposes new, more
onerous detailed accounting requirements for developer fees. This
bill will be heard by the Assembl Local Government Committee.
Staff Recommendation
Authorize the Mayor to send lettt -rs of opposition to SB 208, AB
1865, SB 1238, and AB 652.