Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1991 0717 CC REG ITEM 09C0 ITEM MOORPARK tvv MOOrpam Avenue ^ r)orpark, (;ahlorna 93021 City of 1 I—orpark City Council Hearin; Staff R( „,port (805) 529 -6864 Project Review of Environmental and Planning Concerns Regarding General Plan Amendment 90 -1, Zone Change Z -90-2, Tentative Tract Nos. 4726 and 4738 and Related RPD Arl)lications 90 -2, 90-3, and 404 Project Name: Hearing Date: Time: Location: Staff Contact: Westland Residential housing Project July 17, 1990 7:00 P.M. Moorpark City Coun(, Chamber City Hall 799 Moorpark Avcnw City of Moorpark Deborah Traffcnstedt Scnior Planncr M,OORPARK, CALIFORNIA Gty CoLvdl Meeting of i [ 7 1991 ACTION: 7 Application Numbers Residential Planned t )cvelopment Permit Nos_ 90 -2 and 90--3 [multi- family] and 90-4 [single family] Zone Change No. Z-90 a Tentative Tract Map N4,. 4738 [multi- family] and 4726 [single family] General Plan Applicao to No. GPA 9(Y 1 Application Deemed to be Complete: Assessor's Parcel Numbers Project Location Applicant and Landowner �Av: w ro,wRASON .;R Dccrmbcr 14, 1,") APN 506- 030 -135, 145, 55, 165 and 180 The project is located pn the south side of Los Angeles Avcnuc (State Route 118) at 850 Nortr Ins Angelis Avenue south of Shasta Avcnuc and Goldman Avenue in ih + "ily )f Mo�gr ark. Welland Compan 1644 Eastman Avcnu, Ventura, Californi,� t) 0 i BFRNAHOO rs a Agenda, Requested Actions and Stiff Recommendation Purposes of the Public Hearing. The purposes of this public �iearing are (1) to initiate City Council review of this projec+ (2) to provide a comprehensive description of he project including presentations .by staff and applicant representatives; (3) to receive both written and /or oral puhlic comment on the advisability of approving or denying the proposed project (4) to enable the Council an opportunity to review and evaluate all components of the project and to modify any Conditions of A pproval recommended by the City of Moorpark and other public agencies; (5) to provide the Council an opportunity r review modifications made to the Conditions of Approval recommended by Taff and the Commission at the prior hearing; (6) to review Planning Commission concerns a egarding the proposed project and to consider what project modifications have been made in response to Planning Commission concerns; (7) to review the terms, conditions, implementation procedures and effectiveness of the draft Affordable Housing Agreement; ii-dd (8) depending on the degree to which all questions have been answered and the completeness of the recommended conditions, to direct staff to prepare the appropriate resolutions and ordinances to t a ke the following actions: Environmental Review: certify the Final El R; review, approve or modify and then adopt a Mitigation Monitoring Program review and adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations and appropriat, Findings required by the California Environmental Quality Act. Affordable Housing eement: review, amend, and approve the Affordable Housing Agreement for this project, and, oio ce this Agreement is executed by both parties, approve the following. Entitlements: prepare resolutions recominCriding approval of the project based on the recommended Conditions of Approval (with any modifications suggested by the Council) for Tract 4726 and 4738 and RPD Permit Numbers 90 -2, 90 -3, and 90-4. A related resolution changing the General Plan Land Use Designation for the project site and an ordinance amending the zoning for the property should also be prepared. The formal approval of appropriate resolutions and ordinances would be the subject of a future hearing. 3 Alternatively, the Council could also act to deny the applications. A denial should be considered only after carefully considering all of the application materials, the applicant's presentations, public comment, the project EIR, Planning Commission actions, and related materials. Recommended Council procedures: Staff recommends that the City Council open the public hearing, take testimony from the applicant and then from any member of the public interested in making comments, and then close the public hearing once all interested parties have spoken_ The applicant should be afforded an Opportunity to respond to all comments. Questions should be directed to staff to provide clarification of any issue raised either in the staff report, by the applicant, or by the public. Once the hearing is closed, the Council should review and comment upon the adequacy of the environmental review, the completeness of the Affordable Housing Agreement, and the content of the recommended Conditions of Approval and Findings. If necessary, the Council should request clarification and rewriting of conditions and revised conditions should be reviewed at a future public hearing. -3-