HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1991 0807 CC REG ITEM 08DTO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Background
�r
MOORPARK
799 Moorpark Avenue Moor - ;park, Calif<Irnia 93021 (805) 529 -6864
M E M O R A N D U M
The Honorable City Counci
CORPARK, CALIFORNIA
City Council Meeting
of I
ACTION:
BY
Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community Development 31
July 26, 1991 (City Counc 1 Meet Lng 8- 7- 1991.)
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 706 MINOR MODIFICATION NO. 3
(APPLICANT: CONEJO READY -YIXFD CONCRETE, INCORPORATED)
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) No. 706 was originally issued to
Valleywide Ready Mix Concrete Corporation on January 21, 1958 by
the County of Ventura Board of Supervisors. In 1973, the permit was
transferred to Conejo Ready -Mixed Concrete, Incorporated. Time
limit extensions were approved for CUP No. 706 on 1961, 1964, 1967,
and 1981 by the County of Ventura. A Minor Modification to CUP No.
706 was approved by the City of Moorpark in 1984 to change the
location of a storage building on the site and to modify the
construction materials for that building.
The 1981 Modification to CUP No. 706 extended the permit through
May 21, 1991. The conditions approved by the County in 1981 are
attached. Condition 4 allows the permittee to file for, and the
Planning Director to approve, a Minor Modification to extend the
CUP for one additional ten -year period ending May 21, 2001,
provided that full compliance with all conditions has been
accomplished and that the uses authors ized by the permit will remain
compatible to the properties in the genera] area for the duration
of the additional ten -year period.,
An application for a Minor Modification to CUP 706, to extend the
permit time limit for an additional ten -year period, was received
by the City of Moorpark on November 16, 1990. On December 13, 1990,
staff determined the application to be .incomplete until a hydrology
study was completed to the satisfaction of t:he Ventura County Flood
Control District. The Flood Contro�. District has identified in
telephone conversations prior to December 1.3, 1990, and in a letter
to the City of Moorpark dated December 20, 990, that a hydrology
PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. BERNARDO M. PEREZ SCOTT MONT6CK R', Roy E TALLEY JR JOHN E WOZNIAK
Mayor Mayor Pro Tem Councemembf C <wncilmember Councilmember
The Honorable City Council
July 26, 1991
Page 2
study was needed because the Conejo Ready -mixed Concrete facility
has been modified since it came into operation through
"...activities such as dumping of waste concrete, illegal grading
and other actions..." The Flood Control District was concerned that
these activities may have reduced the channel capacity of the
Arroyo Simi and raised water suxface elevations on adjacent
parcels.
Metcaff and Eddy, a private consulting firm, has been hired by
Conejo Ready -Mixed Concrete, Inc., to complete a hydrology study to
the satisfaction of Ventura County Flood Control District and the
City Engineer. The District has requested extensive testing to
calculate whether a 100 -year flood would pond water above the
railroad bridge, over the Conejo Ready -Mixed Concrete property.
On May 21, 1991 the City Council approved a temporary, 90 -day
extension of CUP 706 to enable Conejo Ready -Mixed Concrete to
provide additional hydrology studies to the Ventura County Flood
Control District. The 90 -day permit extension granted by the City
Council on May 21, 1991 will end on August 1.9, 1991.
Discussion
Over the past 90 -days, continued discussion between Metcalf and
Eddy and the Ventura County Flood Control District has taken place.
After a re- submittal of the hydrology study prepared by Metcalf and
Eddy, for Conejo Ready -Mixed Concrete, Inc. to the Ventura County
Flood Control District, the hydrology study was determined to be
satisfactory on July 19, 1991. The Ventura County Flood Control
District did raise questions about the need for mitigation of
impacts created by the alleged illegal filling in the Arroyo Simi
Flood Channel.
On July 8, 1991 the City received a letter of complaint from a
neighboring resident. This letter alleges that Conejo Ready -Mixed
Concrete is conducting illegal activities on the Conejo Ready -Mixed
site and has failed to abide by conditions established in 1981 as
a result of the last 10 -year CUP extension.
To enable staff and the City Engineer to review recommendations by
the Ventura Flood Control, establish mitigation and jurisdictional
monitoring programs and to allow time for a public meeting on the
requested permit extension, staff is in favor of granting another
60 -day extension. CUP -706 Minor Modification No. 3 would expire 60
days from August 19, 1991 (or October 18, 1991).
Community Development Director's Action
The Director of Community Development has reviewed the Minor
Modification request and intends f.c approve a 60 -day extension.
The Honorable City Council
July 26, 1991
Page 3
Pursuant to Resolution No. CC--88 -523, the Director has the
authority to approve Minor Modifications. This matter is being
presented to the City Council as a courtesy. Should the Council
desire to appeal the Director's decision, appeals must be received
by August 19, 1991. The next available public hearing date would be
the Council's regular meeting on September 4, 1991. If the Council
takes no action on this Minor Modification, then the Director's
decision stands.
Recommendation
1. Direct the Community Development Department to schedule a
public meeting before the City Council in conjunction with
consideration of Conejo Ready -Mixed Concrete's application for a
ten -year extension of CUP -706.
2. Receive and file the report
Attachments:
CUP -706 1981 Conditions of Approval.
Letter from adjacent resident
PJR /KMM
A:\CUP706CC
E
-- RECEIVED JUL 8 1991
Moorpark Planning Department
Attn: Planning Director, Debbie r 3f enst ift and Staff City of Moorpar
799 Moorpark Avenue,
Moorpark, Ca 93021
July 1, 1991
Regarding: CUP - 706 /Conejo.Ready 'ix
This letter is in regard to CUF' -7�r; which you are currently evaluating
under a Minor Modification.
We have several complaints, but I will first address the issues
regarding the CUP -706.
Most importantly condition number 4 clearly states that if all
of the conditions are not compijo with that the permit not be
granted for the second time.
Quote: "the planning director wilt ne authorized to review and continue
this conditional use permit for or additional ten year period
ending May 21, 2001,2roviding that full compliance with ALL conditions
has been accomplished and that the uses authorized 12y this p2rmit
will remain compatible to the Er)x rties in the general area for
the duration of the additional t�" year l,eriod.
The following conditions were nev complied with:
# 17., # 18., # 30., 37., and # 1_ ')ur rrimary concerns are with
# 30 and # 45. "ondit.ion 30 wa:; provide cross- connection control
device for the w;rter � ;ystem. Thc iter dc,partment has not been
able to verify that this was evE, ?onr- a d as a result our water,
I believe is con?,aminctted. We ha 7-; jj t; have a water softener
system installed becarise without: Iv'er /one in out- house gets
rashes or skin problems includlna ur %'i,itors.
Condition # 45 states that thev e req,iired to dedicate a road
easement 64 feet, wide along thr, it f outage of the CUP site.
As you know this area is one of rnas;t dangerous sections of
road. I know of -,t, least one try; `a t;tLLty that has occurred
in that area in recent years. Ter e,i-s_ tt3o had they dedicated
this property as they were require racy have made the difference
of having that section of road nr3 ar.3 traightened prior to
construction of t. }lP freeway. Thi a r fit, )n still has not been
complied with, and if given <-Ipp -< <, L gate ;c, conditions will probably
never be met.
Page 2
Next I would like to address our persona ccncer.ns. We have contacted the
owners directly regarding some of these ssues hat none of them have been
corrected. When the original Conditiona tJse Permit was issued, the
company had a total of 9 trucks and 12 t >;p I cyee,;.. They currently have 21
of their own trucks as well as loading c: hF: °r companies cement trucks and
in addition have 8 sand hauling truck: " -is s it least triple the
operation it was in 1981. The noise lev-i nas c'Zanged dramatically since
we first moved into our:- home in 1977, i ti, trick._. used to start up at 5:30
- 6:00 and that was it, a little engi -ie: pis , ca .id the smell of diesal
fuel, usually on Saturday one or two rr.r �s 'oull make deliveries around 9
or 10 o'clock. Now the noise is loud a: :3 ::!Dr,sttnt, they have no regard
for the time of day it is, they opera~:e 1 ligt long at times.
Our specific complaints follow. They haa, a �cuc outdoor telephone bell
that can be heard ringing all over, anc., Sinda},rs no one answers it so it
rings all day long. They have a lot of )ud pocly running equipment that
is always making more noise than neces::.i The have deliveries at all
hours during the night, sometimes at , i IT, 'he morning and they bang
on these trucks with big sticks to brea�; o,>; ;e tt.e sand and gravel, this
noise is so loud it carries all over. ;1 ;icl
address the traffic
issues, as I am sure you are aware of t ;._ i:;pt?ct of the problem. Saving
the worst for last, every morning at :._ they 1c -ive the tractor start up
with the back up bell, that. goes ding, 1 g, dll_, ding, ding, and it
doesn't stop until at least. noon, the r, e F;itc is designed to be
annoying and loud as a warning to nearlb• 0.:01.!31 so it ds r-his high
Pitched annoying sound and you wake ul. L . i' :30 A. M. overy morning
of the week including Saturdays.
The EIR for the original CUP incorrec. *_1,y ;tated that there was one
house on the hill and therefore no nods, ac to -: seeded to be
addressed in the EIR. In Fact, in 198, t 011 we -e three homes on the
hills across the street and also a tra:-° rcm e:. planned directly
adjacent to the cement factory.
I think it is also important to note that ;pith 311r city business
license if a person wants to sell doll cl t-hes fr-)m her home she must
notify all of her neighbors in order t,, 3 , t h=Ir l> 2rmit, because of
the classification of Minor ModificatiOr , h i 3 :rc& for company that has
Page 3
such a major impact on the area, need >t. "Otily anyone. There is
another cement factory almost next do, -)r 'almat, it is clean, quite
and attractive, that' had the street w ln, cd with sidewalks and curbs
put in.
I think it is very clear what needs t,:j )e done to protect the area
surrounding this project. The City of Y- )Oi-park needs to make the
owners apply for a Major Modification tae CIP -706, condition # 4
specifies. This will mandate that th,e., Oe a [_:ublic hearing and all
of the residents will be notified pr(:-)pc l',, arid wi11 be able to
address there concerns. It is total:�r lair that this company be
allowed to continue to do business i..il,. to y_ar 2001 without
several major issues being discusses'.,
Thank You,
Clifford & Christine May
13853 E. Los Angeles Avenue
Moorpark, Ca 93021
(805) 529 -5090
P.S We have videotaped many of the vi.c;l teens *.hat have been
discussed and will supply a copy to ally,, --;e needing to view it.
C.C. Steve Kueny
Mayor Paul Lawrason
Councilmembers /Roy Talley /scott Montgomery /Bernirlc e�e� /;o1i� Wozniak
CASE NO.: CUP -706 IP_I _AN , -R Conejo Ready Mix Inc.
RESOLUTION NO
,G;; tili 7
DATE. May 21, 1981
PLANNING DIVISION CONDITIONS:
1. That the permit is granted for L cor__rete batcl plant and accessory
buildings as described in: a) the application dated January 7, 1981, and
any attachment thereto; b) the proje� t description contained in the
environmental document for the subject permit; and c) as shown on the
Plot plans) labeled Exhibit "E ", excel..:t or unless indicated otherwise
herein. All previous Planning Division )erl on this site are null and
void.
2. That the operation of this concrete batcr plant shall be limited to one (1)
cement silo, one (1) elevator and batcr el one (1) loading hopper and
conveyor belt, one (1) 600 square loot 'fice building, and one (1) 4,800
square foot shop building.
3. That the location of all buildings, fences signs, roadways, parking areas,
landscaping and other facilities or features shall be as shown on the plot
plans) labeled Exhibit "E" P>5 e t or unless indicated otherwise herein.
r4. t the permit is granted for a period >f time of ten 10 21, 1991. That at the end of this ten ear ( )Years, ending
g of a Minor Modification a Y Period, and following the
pplicator by the permittee, the Planning
ctor will be authorized to review and continue this conditional use
mit for one additional ten (10) year period ending May 21, 2001,
providing that full compliance with all ; onditiogs has been accomplished _
and that the uses authorized by this permit will- remain compatible to the_
properties In the general area for the dc. ration pf
period . the additional ten year
5.
That by November 21, 1990, six months
this permit, the
prior to the initial expiration of
permittee shall submit
Pursuant to Condition No. 4 if
a Minor Modification application
he wise
considered. Upon such timely filing of
es an extension of this permit
staid
continue in full force until the
application, this permit will
renewal
administrative appeals are determined.
request is acted upon and all
"hat
year prior to the expiration of this
by May 21, 2000, one (1)
permit,
Major Modification application to the
the permittee shall submit a
Planning
extension of this permit considered. Up,,n
Division if he wishes an
Modification application, this
such timely filing of a Major
permit, shall
request is acted upon and all administrativ,•
continue in force until the
appeals are determined.
6.
That the permit shall expire when the
discontinued for
.Ase for which it is granted is
a period of 365 conl
days or, more.
7.
That upon expiration of this permit, ar
premises shall be restored by the
abandonment 'of the use, the
permittee
to the Issuance of the permit,
to the conditions existing prior
as nearly a,
aracticable
8.
That any minor changes may be approves;
the filing of a Minor Modification
by the Planning Director upon
applicat
require the filing of a Major Modificatior
:7n, Out any major changes will
the Planning Commission.
appll_atior to be considered by
9.
That the design, maintenance, and ope
facilities thereon shall
ration of the permit area
comply with al
enactments of federal; state, and Cou,
and
applicable requirements and
requirements and enactments shall by r ft
[Y authorvties, and all such
permit.
en,_e become conditions of this
10.
That no condition of this entitlement shall
requiring any violation of law, or any la-l',
of an authorized
re interprc -ted as permitting or
rules or regulations
governmental agency Ir'•
set of rules apply, the stricter ones
or orders
nstances where more than one
st,ali
.e precedence.
11.
That if any of the conditions
or limitat u:n =
are held [o be invalid, that holding s�
remaining
of this Conditional Use Permit
,I
conditions or limit ations set for,h
ali
rot it, , date any of the
12•
That prior to construction, a Zone Cie , ,
Planning Division and e Building
.-e shall ce obtained from the
Perm t s , .
and Safety Division
b, >bzalr rd from the Building
,hi�ii
i
CASE NO.: CUP -706
A,3F LICA%T .]�Conejo Ready .Mix Inc,
RESOLUTION NO.:
P - +( E 'vC : 3
DATE: May 21, 1981
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION CONC
'IONS:
27. That disposal of all potentially haza
approved by the Ventura
does wastes shall be by a means'
County Envi,
nme)tal Health Division.
28- That adequate sanitary facilities shall
requirements of the Environmental
3e provided in accordance with the
Hea
h ol.,ision
29. That an adequate, safe, potable supply
for the occupants and
of water s n
snail be provided
a u r$ of t '
e aulltias.._._
30. That cross - connection control device
sn,,ll be installed
system in accordance with the
on the water
eu
Environmental Health Dlvlslon.
.,rements 7f the Ventura County
31. That in order to protect the publi
Pollution, any abandoned
��
safety and Vprevent groundwater
wells on
accordance with the Ventura County
e property shall be destroyed in
we
C n,iinan(,-
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 'AF.__,
CONDITIONS:
32. That facilities shah be constructed a
Rules and Regulations of the Vent,
-' operated in accordance with the
-a
District. An Authority to Construct
_ounty Air Pollution Control
subject to permit prior to constructic -ii
a 1 be° oc: tamed for all equipment
33. That operations snail be condLct�•c
(Opacity) anci 51 (Nuisance).
-c7 is'an „vrth APCD
Rules 50
FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS:
34. That access roads shall be installed r
for access by fire department
'n ar, ail +ea [her surface, suitable
appar-a.0
35. That all or- ves shall have a minimur
(13'6").
rt; _al c
ear once of 13 feet 6 inches
36. That prior to construction, the appli, of
County Bureau of Fire Prevention for-
snail submit plans to the Ventura
hydrants. h %drants
;e approva of the location of fire
withi
shownon said
00' Of tY,r development shall be
37. That� pi re h ydrants shall
all be installec
construction
d it
and shall conform tO tr
sere. ce prior to combustible
e
_ Water Work:; Manual.
r Run standards of the Count
a . Each hydrant shall be a 6 Ir c
One 4" and ono 219 Inch QLAIOL
wet c,arre+ design, and shall have
b. The required fire flow sr a
le;ed
residual pressure.
at no less than 20 psi
C. Fire hydrants shall be spaced
that
:00 feet on center,
no structure will b? 'a
h ydrant.
and so located
-,e, than 50 feet from
any one
d. Fire hydrants shall be 24'
face. ;,n
enter. re,__ssed in from the curb
38. That the minimum fire flow
ebY
required is ,r,
construction, proximity to other
te'rmined the type of building
structur
devices provided, as specified b
Required
�s, f re wauls, and fire protection
Fire Flow, y th <-
Given the
I S.O. Guide for Determining
Ares,
required fire flow is approximately 200!
nt plans and informatipn, the
shall verify ,.allcn>
Y that the .voter purveyor c.ar
the project,
per ninute. The applicant
�r)v' -,,
I,je t . - quired quantity at
39• That all grass or brush exposing anti
distance of 10C feet
ructJres shall be
according to :hr
Ordinance.
cleared for a
'n u'a C,, ,nt,
Weed Abatement
I
i
CASE NO.: CUP -706 �
APPLi SAN , 'Vonejo Ready Mix Inc.
RESOLUTION NO.: PAGE N0 2
DATE: May 21, 1981
13. 'That the site shall be landscaped as shown on the Landscape Plan labeled
Exhibit "D'-. Continued landscape maintenance shall be subject to
periodic inspection by the Count.. The permittee shall be required to
remedy any defects in ground maintenance, as indicated by the County
Inspector, within two weeks after i atification
14. That trash disposal areas shall be screened with a six (6) foot high solid
fence or wall enclosure. Final design of laic enclosure shall be subject to
the approval of the Planning Direc ;r.
15.
That the property for which this permit is granted shall be completely
surrounded by a two (2) inch
n esh chain link fence constructed to a
height of not less than six (6) feet
and containing no openings except
those actually required for
ingress and egress, as shown on the plot
plan(s) labeled Exhibit "E", and
ar, authorized by this permit; and that a
gate or gates made of the same material
as the fence shall be provided for
each opening permitted, and that such gate or
gates shall be kept closed
and locked during hours of nonoperation. That portion of the fence facing
public streets shall be opaque s bject to 'he approval of the Planning
Director,
16.
That all parking and storage shall
:,e within the �erimgtef fence.
17.
�
That there be no stockpiling of aggregate or any construction within
Arroyo Simi.
�18`That within ninety (90) days of approval of this
C
permit,
areas shall be surfaced with a dust -free material va
and shall t�erwardsabe i
maintained continuously in a dust -free condition. '
19.
That the subject development sha l
provide sufficient off parking which meets the requirements
Orrinanc, Code Article 41 ,
8161-2 3.1. Section
20.
That no parking space shall be oc.,ted within ten (10) feet of a vehicular
entrance to the
property; that all areas show 1 as parking areas shall be
surfaced with asphaltic concrete
d, d it all b� suitably marked, outlining
individual parking
spaces and ^raffl flow .
21.
That all required yards, fences, p. rking areas,, storage areas, operations
yards, and other open uses 'ht
on ^ site shall De maintained in a neat and
orderly manner at times.
all
22.
_
That signs are subject to ven,.j, Count,; rdinance Code, Article 24,
Sign Ordinance.
23,
That no later than ten (10) days alter any change of property ownership
or of lessee(s) or operator(s) of the subject
use, there shall be filed with
the Planning Director the name(s)
and address(es) of the new owner(s),
lessee(s) or operator(s), together a,Ith a letter
from any such person l
acknowledging and agreeing tc Jr :,ly with
a:i condltlons of this permit.
24.
That the exercise of any right 9"a, tec ;:)y th:. permit shall conform In
respects to the
all
regulations an.i equ ri
ire er s of the California State
Regionai Water Quality Control
13o , r
25.
That the permittee agrees as a can,. tion of issuance (or renewal) and use
of this permit to defend
a[ his sole - xpense any action brought against the
County because of issuance
(or -enewal) of this permit or, in the
alternative, to relinquish this
perm,: Permittee will reimburse the County
for any court costs and /or attorr, ,-y's fees
,which the County may be
required by a court to pay as a re ,-ult of
any such action. County may,
at its sole discretion, participate it the
defense of any such action, but
such participation shall not relieve
�.ari
coAditicip, ri tter of his obligaticns under this
26.
That permittee's acceptance ,f
construction
d" s Permit and /or commencement of
/mrtteeeof
acceptance b this permit: shall be deemed to be
yape talinccrar
is o° this :permit.
CASE NO.: CUP -706
RESOLUTION NO.: :;FPLIGaNT: Conejo Ready Mix Inc.
WAGE N;.: 4,
DATE: May 21, 1981
40. That address numbers, a minimum of inches high, shall be installed prior,
to occupancy, shall be of contrastin,,; color to the background, and shall
be readily visible at night. Where t, :ructures are set back more than 250
feet from the street, larger number Nil be required so that they are
distinguishable from the street.
41. That building plans of all "H' oL upancies snail be submitted to the
Ventura County Bureau of Fire Pre ✓a Lion for review.
42. That fire extinguishers shall be inst,,
Protection Association Pamphlet #10
lec n accordance with National Fire
be reviewed by the Fire Prevention
The placement of extinguishers shall
E
-eau
43. That if any building(s) are to to
system, plans shall be submitted
_,rotected by an automatic sprinkler
Ventura County Bureau of Fire Pre,
r,h payment for plan check to the
`Eor `or
e
rc -,ieW-
COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
CONDI' I
1S
44. That adequate crime prevention mea
protection from burglary. These
,ures be taken to assure maximum
mea
adequate lighting; security doors, cc
ores include but are not limited to:
:s,
. entrances on the offi aid
and windows; and clearly visible
PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY CONDITIONS
45. That prior to issuance of a zone _le
dedication to Ventura County: (1)
prance, the applicant shall offer
a
along the entire frontage of the CUP
oad and slope easement 64 feet wide
site; (2) flood
accordance with the Corps of Engineers'
Arroyo Simi
a control easement in
right of'way
to the Ventura County
flowage easement for
requirements for the
�-100d Control District;
that portion of
offers shall be accomplished by
and (3) a
the site subject to flooding. The
subm
Works Agency for review and app, c% a
inq legal descrptions
i to the Public
46 That the Ventura County Building a
proofing of new
d`Safety` shall coordinate
structures with the
e `t
all
aura Co flood
unty Flood Control
47• That ingress and egress shall be rest
District.
Avenue. The entrance shall be irnp-c
c�ted to one location on Los Angeles
the 'Ventura County Road Standares,
ed in accordance with Plate E -6 of
1
'n 9) :lays after approval.
SW: sP78j
12. Development Advisor
Co
green a co Y mmittee' r.r
COPY of the conditions re;,c,
agencies (Planning, Environmen;a
and Public works), The applI, a
recommended conditions of approva
13. Jurisdictional Com ents: Cn Januar;
and Architectural Review Commrte,r
approval of the proposed modl
approve a left turn pocket for
Avenue. However, in reviewirg
Agency determined that 80% r :r
would be easterly from Moorpark, Nara
Ma i 1181, the applicant was
neneed by the applicable County
"a till Ar'CD, Fire Prevention,
r,isr:] nc objections to the
3 1931, the Moorpark Planning
otec una ,irnously to recommend
witf' a request that Caltrans
stboun(J -affic on Los Angeles
is prcjecl.; the Public Works
-)rrou'-ic traffic to the plant
r <' '' Dusand Oaks.
6.
Adjacent Zoning: Adjacent zon I r,,
One -Acre Minimum)
"R -t -1 Ac" (Rural Exclusive,
on the north a
on the south and west. The "R
d east and "M -2" (Limited Industial)
Plants as a conditionally
E -1AC" zone allows concrete batch
permitte
the expansion or modification
use, and the "M-2" zone allows
with the issuance of a CUP
existing concrete batch plants
Therefore,
conditioned would be compatib
the proposed use as
with the
lands;
--r
existing zoning on
7•
Existing and Adjacent Land Uses "he
concrete batch plant includes
permit area for the 7existing
the
which the plant is located. The
entire 6.57-acre parcel on
of the subject parcel
properties on the west and south
are vaca -t
used for an automobile repair he
p
the property on the east s
Is used for one residence. The
e nort
roesidence ea
#evation
60 feet above the plant site should
Therefore,
of the n knoll
educe noise Impacts
the proposed use would
uses;
on the residence.
oe compatible with surrounding land
8•
--
istinn Nat
..._.
4dtpia The 5-:)
graded flat for existing batch
j ct site has been cleared and
:)
is proposed. The southern 2'
ant operations. No new grading
feet
traversed by Arroyo Simi (see,
of the subject site is
zxhi,oit 31.
require the dedication of a flocs
Condition 45 would
easement; Condition 46 would
ontrol easement and a flowage
req.,ire
proofed in accordance with
that all new structures be
the
Coodtrol District; and Condition
regUirements of the Flood
I
of any aggregate or an cons• r .
fore, the Y
would Prohibit the stockpiling
tic,) within Arroyo Simi
proposed modifica[ c�
witf� existing natural features;
There-
orndt'io'ec =; would be compatible
9.
Traffic Circulation: Access to
-
e site
Angeles Avenue 1
is directly from Los
�8;�
to 50 truck deliverihswaoyr
e .timated to average 40
Gr,fr
g
the dedication of a 64 foot 1e
]a y.t.laCondition 45 requires
the site facing Highway
1Count'.
�d easement along the frontage of
•ion
�i'
entrance be improved to
47 requires that the driveway
has reviewed the proposal and
rasr
problems. Therefore, there is
otaJentlfiede anybls gn significant traffic
ac' ..at,j
the proposed project, and the pr
provision for access to serve
Nc
Circulation Element of the County
>ulca compliance with the ; ": in
G�r�al
Plan;
Services:
— Sanitation__ � ded
system, and water is
ot* th4a_ 61ta_ 11 _- •_ . ._ - -�%
septi
provided o,'
No new water mains would be
oun y waterworks rriicte No. lc
req,,
require that adequate sanitary
ec von tions 28 and 29 would
I teas di di
Potable water supply be prow i dac
that an adequate,
ments of the Environmenta
n ,cc:or_l,ance wrth the require-
r
the recommended conditions of
" v�'' on, Therefore, with
ac::.,
be available at the p, ^ojocl sl[a.
a
a •squired services would
11.
General Plan The Moorpark
parcel as "I -2" `0r'`r`
(Medium Indust
'It:' Plan designates the subject
in the M -2'" (Limited Industrial:
vh,ch allows uses permitted
permits for concrete batch plants
)nit, As
"h1- stated above, existing
on the basis that such existinnr,
in
h, 2' zone could be modified
is '
the "M -2"
hComnu�
irk' "unctionaily appropriate"
compatible with theoMoorpark
roe pr "p�'ed Project would be
�r ;
12. Development Advisor
Co
green a co Y mmittee' r.r
COPY of the conditions re;,c,
agencies (Planning, Environmen;a
and Public works), The applI, a
recommended conditions of approva
13. Jurisdictional Com ents: Cn Januar;
and Architectural Review Commrte,r
approval of the proposed modl
approve a left turn pocket for
Avenue. However, in reviewirg
Agency determined that 80% r :r
would be easterly from Moorpark, Nara
Ma i 1181, the applicant was
neneed by the applicable County
"a till Ar'CD, Fire Prevention,
r,isr:] nc objections to the
3 1931, the Moorpark Planning
otec una ,irnously to recommend
witf' a request that Caltrans
stboun(J -affic on Los Angeles
is prcjecl.; the Public Works
-)rrou'-ic traffic to the plant
r <' '' Dusand Oaks.
and that none of the inbound traffic would have high peak volumes.
As stated above, the estimated daily traffic is 40 to 50 trucks per
day. Therefore, the Public Wor, s Agency determined that no left
turn pocket would be required, based on current and anticipated
traffic volumes. Caltrans was se a copy of the subject proposal,
but had no comments. '
'1 ee"'- Planning Division also rece ved a letter from the Moorpark
Community Alliance dated Februat 2, 1981, requesting landscaping
L the boundaries visible to V e public, dust control, and the
tion of some means of ,aducing the possibility of traffic
dents at the approach and entrance to the property (see'
ibit 6). A landscaping and irrigation plan was prepared for
-706 in 1970. This plan, wh :_h was adopted in 1970 as Exhibit
, requires landscaping along Lo> Angeles ,Avenue. This landscaping i1
lready In place. Condition 13 would require continued maintenance
Of the landscape area. Dust conrrol from the batch plant would be
oved by the installation of the new batch plant, and Conditions 32
33 would require conformance with APCD Rules and Regulations.
addition, Condition 18 would equine vehicle storage areas to be
aced with a dust -free material As to the Tissue of traffic safety,
Public Works Agency has recommended that only one driveway
ance on Los Angeles Avenue t,= permitter, and that this entrance
improved in accordance with Pla`e E -6 of the County Road Standards
dition 47). Therefore, with the recommended conditions, the
erns raised by the MoorparK Community Alliance have been addressed;
14. Public Comments: No ""°-,te -d s comments {-om ntere,te °d citizens have been
-. received by the Planning Division "d ate �
15. Ordinance Compliance: Based up, r) the information and findings
set forth above, it has been determined that the subject application
as recommended for approval w 'h the a ttached conditions meets
the requirements of the Ver -tur, o nry Ordinance Code Section
8163-3 in that as conditioned:
a. The proposed uses would e :ompat i bil e with existing and
future land uses within t, e zorn- n the general area where
the uses are to be located;
b. The proposed uses wow'o .t oe cc,noxious or harmful to
adjacent property;
C. The proposed uses would nct 1mpaIr the integrity and
character cf the zone in whict; t -v ar e located; and
d. The proposed uses would to del rimental to
interest, health, safety, co,�e ce cr we„ +are the public
RECOMMENDED ACTION;
1. Find that this project would no,
environment; certify that the ave a s gnlflCant effect on the
attached Negative Declaration
has been completed in comprlanc, with C.E.Q.A. and the State
EIR Guidelines issued thereunde and certify that
reviewed and considered the it this body has
Declaration; and c: at o 7 _o [aired in the Negative
2• Adopt the proposed findings anc ,p, ove the codification of Conditional
Use Permit r4o CJP -706 subject .. e attache: conditions
5)• (See Exhibit
Prepared by:
Steve Wood
Case Planner As 1/ i1 _
T , Davis, AICP
.tantger, I tanning Division
DD:SW:jdeP1010