Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1991 0904 CC REG ITEM 08KOr FROM: DATE: MOORPARK 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 M E M O R A N D U M The Honorable City Council ITEM- k - (805) 529 -6864 :DORPARK, CALIFORNIA City Council Mee fing of 199,1 ACTION: By Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community August 29, 1991 (CC Meeting of 9 -4 -91) Development SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION TO ALLOW FILING OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, ZONE CHANGE, COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND LOT SPLIT FOR MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT PROPOSAL Background The attached letter from John Newton dated August 25, 1991, requests reconsideration of a proposal to allow the filing of a General Plan amendment application for the McDonald's restaurant project, separate from the General Plan Update process. If separate processing for a General Plan amendment is approved, applications would also be submitted by McDonalds and the property owner for a zone change, CPD Permit and parcel map. The past history of the requested separate processing for a General Plan amendment for the McDonald's project is summarized in Mr. Newton's letter. The City Council did vote to deny the request by McDonalds for separate processing of a General Plan amendment on February 20, 1991. The attached minutes for that meeting identify that the expectation was that the General Plan Update would be decided before a separate General Plan Amendment could be completed outside the comprehensive update process. Staff has also attached excerpts from the minutes of several prior City Council meetings to provide additional background information related to the current separate processing request. Discussion The General Plan Update process has been on hold since May 1991; however, work on the Update is expected to be resumed in September 1991, subsequent to the signing of a new contract with PBR. The request by Mr. Newton for the reconsideration is based on the assumption that the General Plan Up` to pro . <�sS -won't be completed until the summer of 1992. The most recent schedule developed for the General Plan Update would result in completion by March 1992. PAUL W LAWRASON Jf� HFHNAHUO M Pf HI Z SCOTT M,)NU, 40i - -LLEY H JOHN E WOZNIAK Mayor Mayo, Prn 'err') Cams a "f r-ember Gouncdmember The Honorable City Council August 29, 1991 Page 2 It is very unlikely that separate processing of a General Plan Amendment, zone change, CPD permit and parcel map could be accomplished for the McDonald's project prior to Spring 1992. However, due to past General Plan Update processing delays, staff is recommending that this matter be deferred to the Community Development Committee for a recommendation Recommendation Continue this item until October 2, 1991, and refer to Community Development Committee for a recommendation prior to October 2. Attachments: Letter from John Newton dated b -25 -91 Excerpts from 2- 20 -91, 6 -6 -90, 10 -4 -89, and 9 -6 -89 CC Minutes PJR /DST a;j,,,us: ?991 — RECEIVED — AU G 2 6 1991 City of Moorpark e Honorable City COuncil 9 Moorpark Avenue ,`Moorpark, CA 93081 Rc: ;c Donald' Resturar-t LOS Dcar `savor and ,Members of the y C' o u c i 1 Thank YOU for scheduling to separate from the General 1 onsidr ration of McDonald 's P1< September 4, 1991, City Counci) ipdal:e at the upcoming `equest undz-11Y concerned with our apprc,�. Council, ieetinf_.So that staff is not ,z a r.`, (� we arc. uLilizin- thi. rr, council considerations ,t}c,��y moist directly to your P Y to and reconsidered, not staff action it is previous that will be concern whatsoever t,,i th staff `< an r �]ectrliendaoposal Ile have no f� 1 it objective and timc�l.y manne, -V to process this project in rte liu,I- given. Council. direction is This reque.; t f OI recoils ice of the property ot,,rlers and th, �on is being made on behalf CO- rQ:- ,3Lion. As pr.evioUSl "' c' `3I Plicant, P-IcDonald's continue with their General Pl :with ,�1cDonald's roperty owners c,-111 1p�13It�c, element CP:� n: se �araLe appli c;, � -t <�nd I_,ot S slit. P;cDai,< I o f ol.. parallel a GPA, Zone Change, their land purchase col; tract d�tr, ,�' , h<IS recently renegotiated he _ venture i;ar11 loss of their previous partner wOi: ld not proc��� gent In Lho Ci are such tha L he Joint �„- I� a id I tiona I LV dil,, ��ic° C1�'S CLC, O j>OOY ('.t;f Il order retail dcvelop- '1 ending conditions, LO C I t ". "1Il i. pI U 1 Cc t Lo 1c1)cit:�ld's proceed Mai n t_h�� 'r I �i I COI;d I Id V, _,I I1 ] 1 UCI: t ]ire ���. �:, 1 l "is b;1l:lilC(c LI.L:.�` >C_1`v'�, In Order Lc� kc c l Lh SLU:U.1;:1 '-nr- r I I t�il i "(?q 11 L'St brl('f t'�L t 1 o n �. I, 1 y ��� tU ',:'hC're l:i�l't�' LU(l�ll' �!1 OUi' CC,UncLI_ C Thn Konorable City Council Fa`e Two (2) 1. McDonald's studied th„ A tV and entered into a land purchase contract for 10A chosen location, the NEC `prim, Road and L.A. 2. Due to the scope, court >J ,xi _y and time involved in the General Plan Update, " l;hvch phis subject property is being considered for c.o •mere i , t land use designation" , tiles property owners and wD,nay'_d' approached the City request - ing to be separated frc the Kodate so as to expedite consideration of the Nc: opI td l project. 3. On September 5, 1989 Ln action to allow `JcDonal t ken "< ni ty Council took formal Plan Update, The Coup: t.o 1 vl ;o neparate from the General directed analysis be Prepared b," City and � cons. that a traffic ltant to be hired by the paid for by ;a._., generated bl the >rald, - , to analyze traffic entin ur L re site. 4. On October 4, 1989 the , scope t,• Council approved the staff ing t number work to• ing thc� number of into: h> t"fic pre - _ analysis, after adjust- adjust- c'&"; Lc�.,, to be reviewed. 5. On August given 8, the the t was given to the city t s° drL[t of the traffic analysis analysis c. the final traffic anal' zrev i_c . On December 18, ,! The results- were that, t. s rep th for was given to the City. her improvements intersection, traffic cr A bc� to the it presently does now ,<+de to flow better than Ides tland, mission Be l it ,-na ysis considered the as well. COl]n t2'y Inn Hotel projects G. the On February 20, 1991 t h i ty C,_uncii, upon required traffic ,--na `icDonald's ;,is, receiving lected to not allow tc separ_atc since it was determin(<i J, the General Plan Up applicant. Staff repc,r � ac. r o t t rime would t l�c� by the Package a entitl:mnA1 c`1eDonald's separate five (5) months to pre,,_ t ; ; >uld take approxi, ately ! Knt the c:e-e schedule <1 to be ! � , Update hearings �. , yr 1 991 . 7. The General Plan Updal 1>e,. t pru jec Li on of s La l led galn , anu h e tCeS on n beg in inri1 5,-i; L )rOb„bly means that hea r inq,, 1H � 1 Sulu, _a 4i th final actibn most dwhi c�u.Il, r�� Due to the high ieVCl by NcDo 3lW ; 1 � thOL :ill be su�,-U cd L. � � l� Lung r,;<;,, K _ c c u� c�c t c� ' ;�1 t tl,�� actual pros ssin<, llonorable City .uncii •tee "Three ( 3 ) McDonald's is i-,repare,7 i authorization to file its PI( first step will. be to meet d Director of C,)j-iDUni tv D v application : °,�a erial� All and what. tees tai l l I-e i m p o c 1 after filing, the applicant Development COmmi t tee, in o i-cl, criteria arc employed for ti -It, restaurant into the existii�: sr.ctioil upon; vouc Cou-11cil's e(t IppllcaLions. The applicant's h tl1e �:ity `tanager, City En -ineer n to ascertain preciseiv are required to be filed, zpected that immediately equi red to meet with Com:junit�. ta" ensure that appropriate. design, )es s t p,�sible integration or the ;r<3tt��rns at this inter- The applicant understar,�:,: ae��e�pts that, as indicated at the time of previous Counci l G -'- Update, no nroi-,:ise of ,.� �:o,�.i j i�= �t� on to file separate fro„, will be reviewed and consid�:: Je11,g c�ade. The project Of the pr��� Citti b<�sed upon the merits 9posal, at a fu,- �ur 1 �. r� Thank you again for your ii 1_i:�b��ess to reconsider ti_ revues t . :�1cDonald's newly app, , r� t ed eo Iona l Real Estate Pepresentative, John Da�,son, �; I i ? 1 be is v to to ansiver any ,7uestions , present on September von; HIV gave. � E,rt, • wton onsulteJnt Supporting Information ALtacijrj ELOISE BROWN Mayor BERNARDO M. PEREZ Mayor Pro Tom CLINT HARPER, Ph. D. COuncllMember PAUL LAWRASON Counolmember SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilawmber RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer MOOKI''AI��C ITEM �s- H E H (_h. R A N I) U M STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J. KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS• A LC.P Director of Community Devoloprnent R. DENNIS DELZEIT City Engineer JOHN V_ GILLESPIE Chief of Police M: The Planning Commission FROM: Patrick J. Richards, Dire, for of t,ommrrnit y Development DATE: September 14 1989 (PC Me+ t{rr,g of 9- ]fi -R9) SUBJECT: STATUS OF GENERAI. PLAN t1PI A'I�: (c, p,% Discussion This memorandum has beers written to status report on the General Plan uith provide Ip<1nte. it(' the Planning Commission with n PBR to prepare the amendments ro Element the L Ci t y signed t}re contract and the Environmental Impact staff has Report lern +hd Use Element and Circulation met with PBR to provide! ntcessnry Of current General Plan n July Sin background data elements, or,.in1)llc. On September 13, 1989, staff suc}ttatat,tIme, n pplicntion information, receive{ from PBR. (A copy of the draft scherlrlr rt drn; etc. General Plnn Update schedule et the 9 -18 -89 meeting•) Staff w.] I be provided to the Commission a1 several weeks to renclr agreement I• ` w' f1(. rk1jig with PBR over the next rhedule dates. On September 6 Corporation �thet C�i'ltaef <!red to allow General for the A arncndmcr,�, az) equest. by MacDonald rs A Development Company },r,.,,C1t of the Los y (1 change application "cated Angeles Avenue and St This f rdr< application road at the northeast rtersectiorr corner ) would be proces,s.,c Plan Update. The City Council s„ l'alatly to be expedited. from the current to��l: f 'I General r;• frig a�.t loft: 1 All 2 3 oti 11aCl)ortald,s to sepnratr " sal flan IJlxlntV.. Staff was directed to prepnr costs (ncludin }; staff t(me ar < t A traffic analysis is to I,, selccicd by the City. 11 l< raffic stu <ly. hl l onr,ult fill t- 1s to be 4. lire LruffIC nnaly'�I`; Wiil In. four -ache site, } ,fi •r at rd by tits• r•nt lr< -- 799 i,� en - - — The Planning Commission September 14, 1989 Page 2 5. During the intervening time, iacDonald's is to pay their fair share of all General Plan Update cols , and may not receive a refund of the funds already paid for the ht coral plan Update. 6. Staff was directed to p„ ,,, d, soon as possible. 7. No promise of approval was w d' h 4tatus back to the Council as As this project progresses in Clay informed. future, staff will keep the commission Should there be any clue ;Lion`; pleas" feel free Traffenstedt, Senior Planner, o- A. e f to call Deborah Recommendation Receive and file. PJR /DST C PAUL W. LA`.VRASON JR. Mayor BERNARDO M.PEREZ Mayor Fro Tem SCOTT MONTGOMERY Councilmember JOHN E. WOZNIAK Councdmember LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk February 4, 1991 M0911P-ARK STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J.KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS. A I C P Director of Community Development JOHN F. KNIPE City Engineer JOHN V_ GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer John W. Newton & Associates 165 High Street, Suite 204 Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: McDONALD'S RESTAURANT 9. STEVEN KUENY City Manager CHERYL J.KANE City Attorney PATRICK RICHARDS. A I C P Director of Community Development JOHN F. KNIPE City Engineer JOHN V_ GILLESPIE Chief of Police RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer John W. Newton & Associates 165 High Street, Suite 204 Moorpark, CA 93021 RE: McDONALD'S RESTAURANT Dear Mr. Newton: This letter is in reply to yo.ir 1990, to the City Manager, correspondence of December 21, regarding to the proposal by the McDonald background information related General Plan Amendment proces:;i1g. s Corpo ration to pursue a separate p The following information is f:t_-ovided answer your questions in the hope that it will regarding to the McDonald's General Plan L1e City Council's actions related the City Council at their meet i_r,.3 7mendment proposal. First of all, Of September 4 -1 did agree to allow McDonald 6, 1989 on a vote of i t110 General Plan processing, with tits, opportunity to seek separate filed current General Plan Update we k request to remain in the predicated upon certain a_;pf�c p,-ogr�,t,1„ The Council's action was 1 -' illustrated as realistic in i e iii, of= traffic mitigation being -ing t.lte the intersection of Spring Rc>jtd overall traffic impact to an,l Los meeting the Council directed „t Angeles Avenue. At that f a would include a traffic analy:,It t o pi,epare a scope of work which t for review. The traffic anal ,, -)1-: Drought back to the Council just the restat_zrant, :; L,c of the entire site, not October 4, 1981 ilia Council staff and approved i t after i '; _: n v P °f t,or., Prepared !�y i i to be reviewed• August 7, ]`,3'�) nr3 tl he number of intersections ht� 2icDonald's to cover the cost i'iLy received $2,000 from of 1 evaluation report. August 8, t ,t,z, l�vicw of the traffic impact C' analysis was given to the t}i�r fix-:�t draLL of t:hc traffic October 1 7, 1910 a status rel',�,; the City Engi_nt,�r -. 'I'h<� iinil �a t 1 v�'rt to t:he City Council by z, i to the City Engineer can Dc�c�c�r� r. ,,��• l;,` traifi�.� study was given this time. 3.'''`,�(I and i.s under review at t John W. Newton & Associates 165 High Street, Suite 204 Moorpark, CA 93021. Page -2- Regarding the second part of yo jr December 21st letter to the City Manager pertaining to McDonald's efforts to file a General Plan Amendment request, I have the ±ollowing comments: The adoption of a General. Plan Amendment is_ a "legislative act" by the C .i ty council. Other legislative acts include the adoption of zoning and Specific Plans. This process is different from entitlement processing inasmuch as there are no pr ,cessi.ng rights involved. The processing of a legislati-v act is at the discretion of the City Council. An interested party may request legislative processing, bu, the 0 Q retains the decision to determine the merits o s,zcL " .request. Pursuant to the City Counc.1,n September 6, and October 4, 1989 actions, the trIff c study related to the completed aforementioned c:nnerns, will be presented to the City Council; at th,t t imc the Cite Council will forward. decide whether. a separate Per�a1_ Plan Amendment will go In conclusion, the McDonald,s tcaffic study is being reviewed by the City Engineer and I woul(.l U)ti_cipate that this office will complete their review, very soot. AE soon as the review is complete the traffic study along with the City Engineers report will be sent to the City Council for a fina- :01.ermination regarding the merits of the proposal- and its relat.i.r h , --(, c�ommi Should you require any furthor please feel free to call me or available, please contact Del-hi Sincerely, Patrick J Director, of / v�= •���lopm�r;t ✓� /l- �t.��l1 �tichards Community inLty traffic impacts. it i or-mat i on regarding the above, �W in the office. If I am not `Iraff,nstedt, Senior Planner. cc: The Honorable City Counci Steven Kueny, City Manag John Knipe, City Engineer. Debbie `i'ra f fensnedt, Suit . (1 Minutes of the City Councii Moorpark, California agE' 8 February 20, 1991 There were r-c_ speaker cards presented for this item. Mayor Lawrason ;aid that because of a perception of a conflict of nterest because of his relationship with the Boys ind Girls Club as a member of the Board of Directors, he would abstain from voting. He indicated that with Councilmember Montgomery absent he beli,:: -ved the item should be continued to an adjourned myetinq next week. MOTION: Mayor Lawi:3son moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion t continue the item to an adjourned meeting on Monday, February 25, 1991 at 5:30 p.m., the public hearing to r,main open. The motion carried by voice vote 3 -0, C '0r_1 7ilmemher Montgomery absent. 10. COMMENTS FROM COUI ' " , M EMBI� RS Councilmember Perez :Mated that the City would benefit from CITYLINK and t .at:. the City should take action to install the systern Mayor Lawrason concurred. Councilmember Wozr-,.i a spoke concerning a recycling day to be held at the Commt.,i ~_',? Canter on February 23, 1991. Mayor Lawrason Comm(nted on the gang task force which will be meeting Febi :ar,, 215. He indicated that both he and Councilmember 1'f e:; would be attending. 11. ACTION /DISCUSSION M;; BY CONSENSUS: By c 11 >;ensu-3 the Council determined to hear item 11.D. P r t:- the other Action /Discussion Items. D. Consider Revic_• _of__Revised McDonald's Traffic Study. Staff tecommendation: Direct staff as deemed appro}.,r i t,, John Dawson, 300 Victory Blvd, #800, Woodland Hills, repre:_(rt.ing McDonald's, said they would like to havoc their application considered as a separate actin, from the current General Plan Update proce�:, ith hof;es that it will expedite the proc ess, Ile , . i 1 ic.t.o rically it. takes cities long periods of ti:rl c _camp ete the General Plan Update process and t; E X _ 1c'I n�rld's Corporation was hoping to :De exc tid. I ) wl pit they thought would be a lengthy pros, Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Pjge 9 February 20, 1991 Mr. Kueny states: that the General Plan Updated will be decided before a general plan amendment could be completed outsi(le the general plan update process. He recommended ° eceiving and filing the report and not proceeding ith separate processing. MOTION: Councilmember Perez moved and Councilmember Wozniak seconded a motion to receive and file the report and to deny the request for separate processing of a general plan amendment for this project. The motion carried by voice vet( -?, Councilmember Montgomery absent. A. Consider Planned Development Permit Nos 1062/1063 (The Embassy Grc_gp.Inc._) Request for an Additional Time Extension. Staff Recommendation: Grant conditional six month time extension. (Continued Item 11.A. from Tanuar} 23, 1991) Mr. Kueny said t iat the Parcel Map that accompanied the planned development permits was recorded. He said there is a subdivision agreement in place and bonds. The ri.cTina PD's were approved in September 198'7 MOTION: Mayor Lawra_on moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to deny the request for an additional time extension. The motion carried by voice vote 3 -0, Councilmember Montgc)r- rZ ab:>, °nt. B. Consider Ordinance to_ Provide that Written Contracts may_ bf; Si ned_by the City Manager as an Officer of th <__ City. Staff Recommendation: Introduce Ord i, Mf cF� NO. 1.39 for first reading. In response to Mayor- Lawrason, Mr. Kueny clarified the situations ender which the City Manager would be authorized !c ex(�cut contracts if the proposed ordinance wer: oE�t.ec3. Councilmember er n icated his support of the ordinance. BY CONSENSUS: By tt:e previous minute action of January 20, 1986 c�;r {_ i r� i ;n�� t his matter_ was rescinded. Ms. Kane read * > i e 21, 1"Ce title. Draft Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 3 — June 5, 1990 Councilmember Harper indicated that he felt the City should move forward in preparing the language for inclusion of the item as a measure on the ballot in November. CONSENSUS: By Consensus the Council determined to place t -e item back on the agenda of ..7-ine 20, 1990; the draft ordinance to be redrafted with all numbers included and the language to place it on the ballot for the statewide election in November. Q. Consider Half _ Cent Sales Tax Support. Staff Recommendation:: Adopt a resolution in support of the Traffic Reduct.ioF and Growth Management Ordinance and Expenditure Plan, MOTION: Councilmember icrown moved and Councilmember Mo=gomery seconded a motion to cons inue this item to the meeting of June 20, 1990. The motion carri# -d by unanimous voice vote. R. Reconsideration oia request for scope of work regarding a Traffic Study proposed for a General Plan Amendment and Zoning Change requested by the McDonald's Corpor ation. Staff Recommendat one Direct staff as deemed appropriate. The Council di sussed the report of the McDonald's Corporation Traffic Engineer with regard to mitigation strategies for t: ra f f is at the corneK of the proposed site. In response tc cc ncil question, Mr. Knipe indicated that he would need to -eview the information submitted by the McDonald's Corporr+.i>rk traffic engineer. MOTION: Councilmember- Harper moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a motion to havf the City Engineer review the information provided by McDonald': Traffic Engineer; the City's Traffic Engineer to do a cost - stimate for the installation of double left -turn lanes for n.rr- h and southbound traffic; a deoosit of $500.00 to be made to °.f, city t:: cover cost of work done by City Engineer. The motion :. - r,,.E•d b,, unanimous voice vote. S. . Consider Respons( tc; Vent.rra County Cablevisions on New Pricing Structure Councilmember 'r.3ro,. indicated that she was disturbed by the new rate structurf adopted by Ventura County Cablevision. She requested tha the Council authorize the Mayor to send letters strongl; o'cstirj the rate structure. MOTION: Councilmember 'o.an mo�)ed and Councilmember Montgomery seconded a motion to dir ct letters to be sent to Ventura County Cablevision locally and r_hei.r "some office, strongly protesting the new rate structur., ,pies t­ go to Federal legislators. The motion carried by un rr „i �,r ic ante. Minutes of the City Council Mooraark, California Page October 4, 1989 C. Consider Request from ilanninq Commission seeking direction from the City Counc_i_1_ c:oncerni nq Draft Hillside Performarce Standards. Staff Re:ommendation: Create a technical committee to make recorrnerdatic,is regarding this matter. Councilmember Harper stator that w shout protection there would not continue to be open ,,ace )n the hillsides. He furt -er indicated that he would l K:e to take out the language wh'ch exempted specific plans. Councilmember Montgomery sa d he would like an analysis of the compatibility of the propose,I ordina, ice with the General Plan. Mayor Brown indicated th.it sti(, wa° concerned with the valley floor. Mr. Kueny suggested that :he Community Development Committee meet with two Planning Comriss one,,,s and staff and report back to the Council. MOTION: Mayor Brown moved no Councilmember Montgomery seconded a motion to move the joint meeting Frith the Planning Commission to October 30, 1989. The ,/, cF, votr was unanimous. After discussion by the Cour:il of the composition of the group, the following motion was he,i d MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to have the Community Development Committee meet with Planning Commiss')n(,rs Wozniak and Scullin and staff on the Draft Hillside Por ormance Standards; a report to be compiled for discussion t, the October 18, 1989 Council meeting The voice vote r,i uranimc.s.. D. Consider _Proposed Ira,`i+ ___ St:; Sco __ ____ u y p? of Work for N. E. Corner o Corner of New _ Lo; - - _ _ An _eles Avenue and Sprinq Road tMcDonald's). Staff RE' _ mmcndat onr Direct staff as deemed appropriate. Councilmember Lawrason indi rtoo thit he had concerns about the extensiveness of the scope i work Councilmember Harper said t - „ity would very much like to have a McDonald's in the (icN but tiat the site selected was inappropriate because of IF, cxisi.irg traffic and the potential impact, of the 118/23 r gip, c; n',;,c.IJon. He indicated that other pnssiblt sites shor �r, ,ti erect. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page October 4, 1989 Mayor Brown stated her :c:)rcerns regarding the traffic a7d impacts of the 118/23 connec .ion and indicated that the trafr-c analysis was to determine wh »ether there would be an improvement in traffic. She said r.h t improvement should be clearly demonstrated. Councilmember Montgomery sai it should only be necessary -o analysis the intersection of Spring Road and Los Angeles Averue and not the others proposed the >CoPF, of work. After further discussion by the Council on what the scope of work would include, the fcl�c inq motion was heard: MOTION: Councilmember Mo tgcmery moved and Councilmember Lawrason seconded a motion tc assign review of the scope of work to the Community Development :ommitter> who would meet with staff and a representative of McL)or11d "s Corp, and report back to the Council. The motion fa 1 1 d () n i voice vote of 2 - 3, Councilmembers Harper, Percy, id Mayo. Brown dissenting. MOTION: Councilmember Pere. moved a-id Councilmember Montgomery seconded a motion to strike "lo 8 (provide an analysis of the effects of the extension of Jew Los Angeles Avenue to Collins Drive as it would relate to ° e subje(t site) and No. 9 (provide an analysis of project impa( s on at least two other sites in the City, one of which mu,,' big a mid -block site); No. 5 was amended to identify pro, ct impacts to the following intersection estimated anc >> sting project level of service for each of the following sc::e!r ic;s: a P existing, b) cumulative, including Carlsberg Specif-i the lan and all filed projects but not components of the Gene rl P'ar update, and C) ultimate cumulative including the (...m Specific Plan iat v, [roject list and Carlsberg and the comer, The n° J the General Plan update. voice vote was unanimor CONSENSUS: By consensus ti,, )ul(ii1 determined to go with scope of work as amended. E. Consider Minor Mod ific,:tion No. 1 Residential Planned Development No. 1071 (Tract 4341_ and 1072 (Tract 4342) and Minor Modification No. 2 to Residential Planned Development No. 1070_ Tract 4340) - Urban West Communities; a report re_arding modification o floor plans, elevations 1 — and -- --- common landscaped arei< for the West Staff Recommendation: Dire, dff ,3�. 'eomst ed appropriate. Counci lmember Lawrason sugci,r ,d 3 cc btr ibution on the part of Urban West to be used in f h,rse of the Arroyo Vista Community Park cf $100,000 Tom Zanic, of Urban West, ­Ip�n >e to Councilmember Lawrason said that in consideratior h r luast they would agree -o the park r" on t.rif;ution Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California September 6, 1989 MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Montgome--/ seconded the motion to authc izE Mayor Brown and Councilmem^=_r Lawrason to attend the Leac,_ie Conv( -ntion and designate May_- Brown as voting delegate fo} 1989 ?aque of California Citi Annual Conference and C, inc ilmemner, Lawrason as vot�-- alternate. The voice vote wa unanim�u, Mayor Brown requested that Lt Rodricfuez return with informati:n from the Van Nuys station of the [.ot Angeles Pol ice Departme -t regarding their program for -_itizen, allowing police to st_a citizens at any time between 01 t, 00 a.m. 11. I. Consider restructuring )f Youth Dance Program. Staff Recommendation: Direct taf'- c;_ jeemed appropriate. Phil Newhouse, Communit, Servi(es Director, presented a modified recommendation hat the dance include 7th to S :h graders and eliminate ic; ratification Cards and use computer printout of enrollment T'i , w uld nclude 12 to 15 year old students. After 1 cu, s'or staff suggested changing the grade levels at thf in ( ci r(lude 7th to 10th grades. MOTION: Councilmember Harlot moved and Councilmember Montgomery seconded the motion to appr)v amended staff recommendation with ( a change to the grades for t � dar-c attendance to 7th to IC-'-h grades. Motion carried unari a ly t)y voice vote. 11. B. Consider for reconsidera ion _a request -to expedite general plan amendment and zoni, � change for Northeast Corner of — - -- NEW _Los_ Angeles Aver ue and Spry Road. Staff Recommendation: Dire - -t a`f o(, pm d Appropriate. Councilmember Montgomery s -ate,i tfat McDonald's should oe allowed to resent t_m�, p 0 o,je( He stated he oppo_�d zoning this site for mu' i famil,,, residential use and t ^at the cornea should be (GT) mer al land use. He also recommended that MCDon;:i l <, I, „, ” ho i r own money to proc -_ce a proposal to be eva 1 ua • , t y t aie C,) (in c i l . Councilmember Harper stal �d th,it the McDonald's project and the balance of the f,rlt Pty wit be addressed during -he General Plan Update. fl., t 11 (:0 iat a fast food restaurant with traffic impact hir ihv:ori, henefit to the community for fast t�­ackinq. { t 0-' i t— are other sites in ,rie community which woh 0 qt at,(� locations for a McDor,a1,�l` s. Coun� i lri�emf er Pere, , t a well- desic -ed self - contained multi fa. I r;jict could work. ,e requ�strd more inforna, 3r ; , *,,he remainder of :fie r N Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California h.�c :9 September 6, 1989 site and questioned -io,,� the removal of this item wou-d affect the General Plan pdate Councilmember Lawrason ated thrt he supports the proposal and that the zoning sh, 1 lc± tie commercial. He recommenc .'d permitting the appl it r, tape the project out of tie update process. Mayor Brown stated t.h,-, t.hose present tonight may not represent the entire cormun ty. She expressed her concern regarding impact on the General Plan. She asked if there was a way to continue t,: pay the costs of the General plan, but withdraw and pay fo .,epara..e consideration, including staff time, attorney',, t ne ind r:rcessinq. Mayor Brown indicated s w)ulr, like to see the plans for the balance of the si +. Armend Collen stated ho ould l •c.e to present the plans for the entire parcel, but, �ho� cur -ent zoning is inconsistent with a commercial app l i : it . c,ri He is requesting that they be pulled from the Gcre rl Plan Update process. They have already waited two yet, s and another two years is not financially possible e stated that they are successful because they find app­c.riate 'ocations. Mr. Collen also stated that they iris oca1. :>d McDonald's at busier intersections. He i n&I ate, he only wants an opportunity to bring the project t: f e h(- )unci l Mr. Manual Asadurian, r* owner of the property, stated McDonald's is the be,.t staurar for the property and that a quality project will bi 'It MOTION: Councilmember Harp - staff to develop the scope designated traffic enginee- traffic analysis will deters, service of that intersec t r service in that. intersection -in that location; and after are completed and brought l will be made whether to f,,j Amendment. Motion failed `io MOTION: Councilmember Mn Lawrason seconded a moticcr from the General Plan Upd,c t , a scope of work which wou brought bark to the CoUnc date, U w trafRis analyst traffic araly- to bc> of moved that the applicant work with tf e traffic study conducted by a aid for by the applicant; that the nc wha!, is the present level of a =id wh< i,t is the likely level of ft,er the proposed McDonald's goes e esults of the traffic analysis .� ti .he Council, determination tie prc iect from the General Plan '(k )f a second. gmrme,, y moved and Councilmember r lsw tho applicant to separate n' t._ircct the staff to prepare rcicie traffic analysis to be ,o Y it the earliest possible b, 1 t cted by thr C i ty and the I th(, a�)plicant to pay Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California September 6, 1989 all costs associated with ,.,e analysis, including staff tire and, in addition, to pay the snare of the General Plan Update costs during the intervening limo,; and no promises for approv_i of the project to be impUei 11ct.')r carried with CounciImemb =_r Harper dissenting. 11. F. Consider funding intrac7 y bus service for Moorpark County Des Event. Staff Reconm(,ndatic)n: Approve transfer _f reserve funds for Moorra, 6, ;ciu­ t °•,/ Days event. MOTION: Councilmember Harps seconded the motion to appropriate $345 (including_ fund reserve for intra -cit.y 1 approve the routing of the Country Days. Motion carri( I moves; a,rd Councilmember Montgomery ppr)ve staff recommendation -o 0 contingency) from the general s servio e during Country Days; and rnci toe absence of a fare during in,rn irrou ;1y by rol l cal l vote. 11. H. Consider adopting Reso a ion No. 89 -611 to restrict parking -- - - on south side of Hearorr sty eet between Monroe Avenue and -------- - - - - -- ollins_Aven_u_e_.- Staff c )rrm- n,lat i on: Approve Resolution No.89 -611. MOTION: Councilmember Montil:•dery moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to appro,,,, 4s)lut�on No. 89 -611. The voice vote was unanimous. 11. J. Consider Resolution 89 >1 accepting membership in the outhern California ,Jo nt. Powers InSurance _Authority_ Staff Recommendation: 1[,rrve Resolution 89 -612. MOTION: Councilmember hair, seconded a motion to adopt R, agreement between the Authr'', staff to convert liability r_ to the Authority; to authr $25,000 S.I.R. back to 1986 of $45,000 ($25,000 for 'a Authority S.I.R.) by deg q General Fund Reserve for 1 unanimous r rrove(i and Councilmember Perez o LA..eorn No. 89 -612, executing the y Ana the City, and to authorize rer,rgcs from the previous carrier cbta iing tail coverage with a nc e"tai,lish a reserve for claims rr_�de rge and $20,000 for the it r i'� additional $35,000 of I ij 1w ,r� The voice vote was Consider Awar - dingContrIr for Annual Overlay Project. ------ - - - - - - Staff Re- co-mmendation " i'a ontract to S.P. Milling Company. John Knipe indicated t.,r. $210,000. However, apprnxirnately $238,OUh $448,000. the FAU f �n i but is recommended f(° has a 1 ready 1)(,,[1 b i d ..i�r budget. for this project is or, ity will be receivi7g A funding for a total f cry used for other project_ h �, t ime since this pro,]._-_t v, for ron� t ruc t. i on .