HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1991 0918 CC REG ITEM 09CTO:
FROM:
DATE:
M 9- 2,
MOORPARK ITEM
799 Moorpark Avenue Mo. rrpark, California 9302C;tYC0g8MP& 9rf*64
1992/
ACTION:
9`/5 -
M E M 0 R A N D U f✓!
THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCI_,
Patrick J. Richards, Dire—tor of
Community Development
T1111
September 6, 1991 (City ()until Meeting of 9- 18 -91)
SUBJECT: RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 1991, THE
WESTLAND COMPANY (DA 91
Background:
The City's Residential Development. Management System was adopted by
Resolution No. 87 -421 (see Attachment No. 1) and amended by
Resolution No. 88 -522 (see Attachment No. 2) Based upon the City's
Growth Management Ordinance, a t)tal of 270 allocations are
available each year for the years c.f 7.989 through 1994. Since no
applications for development allotments were received in 1989 and
1990, there is currently a surplus o� 540 allocations available for
those years as well as 270 allocat on_: avai-lable for the current
(1991) year.
The attached resolutions contain c- valuation criteria (refer to
Section 9) to be used in determining the eligibility of projects to
receive development allocations by weighing their positive and
negative aspects and ranking them accordingly. Under this system,
the better projects should receiv( a higher rank and a higher
percentage of the allotments requested
Discussion:
The one application filed this year (DA 91 -1) was for 18
Development Allotments. Development. Allotment application No. DA-
91-2 is a request for 291 surplus allotments to allow the
development of Tract No. 4726 and 4738 (The Westland Company
Project) . The surplus allotments requested are from the years of
1987 and 1988. Tentative Tract Map No. (s) 4726 and 4738 were
approved by the City Council on August, 7„ 1991.
Resolution 87 -422 and 88 -522 do iiot specifically outline the
procedures for allocation of surplus Development Allocations. In
1989, Griffin homes submitted a Development: Allotment application
PAUL W LAWRASON JR BERNARDO M PEHI SCOTT MO NT, Mi a' HOY f TALLEY JR JOHN E WOZNIAK
Mayor Mayor Prc fern Councilrne- •�.� Councilmember Councilmember
Residential Development Management System 1991 (DA -91 -2)
September 6, 1991
Page 2
requesting 134 units of the surplus Development Allocations for the
years of 1987 and 1988. The Council approved issuing surplus
Development Allocations to Griffin, homes in return for a First Time
Home Buyer Program. The Affordabl:i? Housing Agreement for the
Westland Company project requires the City to schedule a public
hearing before the City Council to consider granting surplus
Development Allocations for all 231 project units.
The Westland Company development project consists of three separate
but related Residential Planned Developments. There are specific
design details available on quality of design in relation to the
exterior appearance of the buildings and landscaping for the
Residential Planned Developments RPD's 90- 2,3,4). Resolution No.
87 -421 requires that a project that does not receive a minimum of
70 percent of the points under Sec!.ion 9.13 shall be eliminated from
consideration. Based on this surplus Development Allocation
application dated August 21, 1991, staff has assigned a total of 96
points for Section 9.B which is W% percent of the total points
available (see Exhibit 1).
Part A - Availability of Public Farcilitit:Is and Services (65 total
points are available.)
1. Water Service Efficiency and Impact ('10 points available):
The project consists of 291 units �n an existing pressure zone that
has adequate storage capacity. the developer will connect to
existing water lines in Los Angeles Avenue. No community
improvements are proposed. Regariless of the current state of
supply /demand relationship the project site will be required to
incorporate, into the project lfsigrn, jetails to ensure water
conservation.
2. Waste Water Service Impact (110 points available):
The Environmental Impact Report (EIR) identifies that no
significant sewer infrastructure components are expected to result
from approval of the project. Furthermore, it has been determined
that sewer effluent from the Westland project can be accommodated
without adversely affecting plant capacity as long as connection
and processing of effluent does got occur prior to March 1991.
Waste water services can be provided to the project but will
require the replacement, encasemen.., or protection of the existing
27 " (inch) sanitary sewer line 1 cat.ed ,.ri the north bank of the
Arroyo Simi.. No community improvt,i ant 3 proposed.
Residential Development Management System 1991 (DA -91 -2) `-
September 6, 1991
Page 3
3. Storm Water Drainage (10 points available):
Conditions of project approval will. adequately reduce the
Possibility for water flow onto adjacent arterials. On and off -site
improvements, identified by the City Engineer, will mitigate any
storm drainage problems encountered as a result of this project.
Conditions of approval will ensure that no increased peak runoff
will result. No net capital con':,ributions by other agencies are
required.
4. Fire Protection (10 points available):
Staff determined that from the mid -point of the project site, the
property can be serviced by two fire stations. These fire stations
are: 4185 Cedar Spring (1.51 miles away from the project site) and
782 Moorpark Avenue (1.23 miles eway from the project site).
5. School Impact (10 points available):
Given the present capacity of al elementary schools in the City,
the Moorpark Unified School Distr,ct did identify that the project
would significantly increase elementary school enrollment within
the Moorpark Unified School District (Environmental Impact Report) .
However, a new elementary school :located in the project vicinity,
Arroyo West which will be open fo classes on Tuesday September 3,
1991, will help mitigate any posibie classroom overcrowding and
unusual scheduling. Furthermore, payment of adopted fees to the
Moorpark Unified School Distri t wi.l! properly mitigate any
Possible overcrowding of school ,cili.t.;es.
6. Street Traffic .Impact (10 pc:) i_nts available) :
The project will pay all traffic 11itigati.on (Area of Contribution)
fees and will provide all street :improvements normally required by
the City. The proposed developmern: is providing extensive traffic
improvements both on and off_sit�
.1 through contributions of funds
and improvements, like signalizat_;,on and street widening as deemed
necessary to approve the developm, °nt.
7. Project Seniority (10 points available per year):
Not applicable
8. Community Improvements (5 points available):
The applicant has been conditioned to provide off -site (as well as
on -site) flood control. and drainac r� impr.c�vements.
Residential Development Management System 1991 (DA -91 -2)
September 6, 1991
Page 4
Part B - Quality of Design and Contribution of Public Welfare and
Amenity (110 total points are available):
1. Design Quality - Buildings !10 points available):
Sample elevations and information on height, interior features, and
privacy have been provided. Speci.`ic conditions of project approval
afford the Department of Community Development stringent design
regulations and authority.
2. Open Space and Landscaping 10 points available):
The project provides excellent landscaping as defined in Resolution
No. 87 -421. Specific landscaping requirements have been
incorporated into the project through conditions of approval of the
Tract Maps and RPD Permits.
3. Design Quality - Site and Perking (10 points available):
- Setbacks will be consistent with zone requirements. Condition No.
14i. for Tentative Tract No. 473�a states that parking areas shall
be screened from view through tt:e use of landscaping and 3 -foot
tall berms and /or a low wall. The project is designed as to
minimize negative impacts on surrounding uses; all utilities are
required to be installed underground. The project meets fire
department standards; garages will be consistent with zone
requirements; and adequate intersection sight distance within the
project will be ensured through required deed restrictions.
4. Provisions of Useable Open Space (10 point available):
The project does provide areas of public open space as evidenced in
the five active and passive recreation areas on the project site.
The project will comply with z(.ning requirements in regard to
setbacks, which does allow for private open space on each lot.
Greenbelt areas will also afford he visitor or resident areas of
passive recreation - otherwise s� -gin as useable open space.
5. Deleterious Impact on Trees ;5 points available):
According to the EIR, within the entire property site nearly all
native vegetation has been remov,}d and replaced with cultivated
crops, greenhouse sheds, and ori,amenta.- plantings. Some native
vegetation exists along the we: tern perimeter of the subject
property but these few plants are i,f almost no biological
significance to local animals. 1'1�e bic)loq r_cal insignificance of the
subject parcel is derived from i t ; z : ;.to -r c use as an agricultural
5
Residential Development Management System 1991 (DA -91 -2)
(, September 6, 1991
Page 5
field and poultry farm, its proximity to developed areas
surrounding the project, and the degraded condition of the Arroyo
Simi.
Prior to issuance of the Zoning Clearance, a more detailed
landscaping plan is required to be approved by the Director of
Community Development for the project.
The project is conditioned to provide a riparian woodland planting
program. The planting program will be designed to provide a nearly
continuous canopy of local ripari,..n woodland trees along the Arroyo
margin within the project limits
6. Provision of Water Conservation Features (10 points
available):
The project is required to include ultra -low water consumption
plumbing fixtures consistent wi--h City Ordinance No. 132 (see
Attachment No. 3). Exterior landscaping shall include automatic
sprinkler controls and drip irrigation systems, wherever feasible.
Landscape species are required t::o be drought tolerant. Adequate
room shall be planned in utility right -of -ways for installation of
reclaimed water pipelines to service open space landscaped areas,
streetscape landscaping, and open space residential greenbelts.
Kitchen cabinets shall be configured to enable installation of low
water demand conserving dishwashers and washing machines.
7. Provision of Energy Conservation Features (10 points
available):
Thus far, no solar energy systems
residential units. The project. is
shall include a requirement `c
devices:
* Stoves, ovens, and rant
have continuous burning
are required or proposed in the
conditioned so that the CC &R's
the following energy saving
Ees, when gas fueled, shall not
p:i.lct Lights.
* All thermostats connec -ed to the main space heating
source shall have night se.bacic features
* Shower controllers (whi h emit a maximum of 2.5 /gallons
of water per minute).
* Kitchen ventilation systems shall have automatic dampers
to ensure closure wher rat in use.
* All hot water lines st;a 1 t,e .iiisulated.
Residential Development Managemeit System 1991 (DA -91 -2)
September 6, 1991
Page 6
* Solar panels for heating any swimming pool (s) constructed
within the development shall be subject to the approval
of the Director of Community Development
8. Bicycle and Foot Paths, Equestrian Trails, Facilities and
Greenbelts (10 points available):
Bicycle and foot paths, greenbelts and recreational facilities will
be provided on site. The project has been conditioned to provide
pedestrian walkways that shall be designed to provide an
aesthetically pleasing streetscape appearance throughout the whole
project site; all pedestrian walkway plans shall be subject to the
Director of Community Development design approval; sidewalks along
the Los Angeles Avenue property °rontage will be provided.
Greenbelts throughout the project site and five recreational areas
will afford the visitor or resident recreational alternatives. In
terms of bicycle access, surrouncing arterials will either have a
Class II bicycle designation ( str.pping and a 4' lane) or Class III
bicycle designation ( signage but ? o stripping) . A Class I bike path
(an area specially designated, v curbing, for biking only) is
provided along the Arroyo Simi,
No equestrian trails will be cont.ructed on the project site.
9. Site and Architectural Oesign Quality - To a hic
Consideration (10 points available): �� P
The project site does not require jrading of 20 percent and greater
slopes. To develop the proposed 291 units on the 35.4 acre site
grading will consist of cut and fill to construct building pad
elevations. Additionally, grading ai l 1. oc,..ur to establish necessary
drainage patterns.
10. Impact to Archaeological Sitys (5 points available):
The project will have no imp& - any known archaeological
resources.
11. Affordable Housing (10 point.; available):
The project will provide 10 moder�.,te income single family detached
units (125% or less of the area median :income) and 90 moderate
income (110% or less of area medi,in income) multi - family attached
townhouse units. The remainder o- the units will be market rate
single family (106) and multi- f, :mi.ly (B5) units. Based on the
matrix contained in Resolution T.o. 87-4211 the project is not
eligible to receive points for z if oidabl #, housing.
Residential Development Management System 1991 (DA -91 -2)
September 6, 1991
Page 7
12. Absence of Deleterious Impact on the Physical and /or Aesthetic
Environment (10 point available):
The project creates environmental impacts which are mitigated at no
expense to any public agency and is compatible with the adjacent
land uses. The project will resu:_t in cumulative air quality and
traffic impacts which are not fuly mitigatable. The Environmental
Impact Report (EIR) states that, at present, the proposed
development has little significance to the City of Moorpark as an
open space, passive recreational cirea and no adverse effects would
result from conversion of the agricultural and industrial
facilities on the property to residential uses.
View sheds from the project site are not significantly harmed or
altered as a result of this proposed project. Off -site view
corridors from Los Angeles Avenue:-, Maureen Lane, Goldman Avenue,
and Shasta Avenue and terraces along the Arroyo Simi south of the
project site are judged to bE insignificant, provided that
necessary mitigation measures arc adopteJ
13. Needed Public Facilities (10 points available):
The project is conditioned to provide a school bus turn -out on the
south side of Los Angeles Avenue. The project will provide for the
street widening of Los Angeles Avenue between Liberty Bell Road and
Belltramo Road and contribute fun.is for intersection improvements
along Los Angeles Avenue and Spri ,g )joa,,
Recommendation:
1. Evaluate the attached application (see Exhibit 2) for DA -91 -2
and staff's tentative point -ating recommendations, and make
a determination on point ass.i.cnment consistent with
Resolutions 87 -421 and 88 -52 .
2. If concurrence is made with staff's point ranking sign the
attached resolution of approval (see Exhibit 3) requested for
291 surplus Development Alloy= 1tions for DA -91 -2 (The Westland
Company).
Exhibits:
1. Staff's Draft RDMS Evaluation Form for DA -91 -2
2. DA -91 -2 Application Material. from 8 -21 -91
3. Resolution No. _ (grant no approval of DA -91 -2)
Attachments:
1. Resolution 87 -421
2. Resolution 88 -522
3. City Ordinance No. 132
- . 9
RESOLUTION NO.9.-
A RESOLUTION OF THE MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, AWARDING SURPLUS DEVELOPMENT ALLOTMENTS FOR 1991 TO
TRACT MAPS NO. 4726 AND 4738; RPi's 90 -2, 90 -3 AND 90 -4; ZC 90 -2;
AND GPA 90 -1, (APN 506 - 030 -135 145, 155, 165, AND 180) THE
WESTLAND COMPANY (DA 91 -2).
WHEREAS, Measure F, an initiative ordinance establishing a
residential development management system, was approved by the
residents of the City of Moorpark an November 41 1986; and
WHEREAS, on September 23, 1987, the City Council adopted
Resolution No. 87 -421, an i.rnplementation resolution setting
forth the process and procedures for issuance of residential
building permits under Measure F; and
WHEREAS, on November 16, 195:, the City Council amended said
residential development management :system (Resolution No. 88-
522); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Measure F, after a duly noticed public
hearing, the City Council c>=luded its review of the only
project requesting surplus t, lotments from the 1987 and 1988
cycle years;
WHEREAS, on September 18, 1491 the City Council held a duly
noticed public hearing anc considered the point rating
recommended by staff, heard - testimony from the applicant for
development allotments and o`her interested persons;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Coun-'il hereby finds and determines
that the purp(se and intent of Measure F will
best be pronoted by awarding the surplus
allotments to Tract Maps No. 4726 and 4738;
RPD's 90 -2, 9C - -3, 90 -4; ZC 90 -2; GPA 90 -1; APN
506- 030 -135, 145, 155, 165, 180; for The
Westland Comp, ny � ESA- 91 -2) .
SECTION 2. The allotmen s are awarded based on the
criteria set °orth by Measure F as defined in
the implemen,inq :resolution and as more
particularly lt: forth below:
That the awarding of allotments is consistent with the
Purposes, standards, and guidelines of Measure F, Resolution
No. 87 -421 and Resolution N:). 88 -'522 included within the
Residential Development Mana menf- ystem.
�1
That the award of surplus allotments for the 1987 and 1988
years is consistent with the policies, goals and objectives of
the General Plan as follows
Land Use Element:
a. The awarding of surplus allotments promotes planned, well
ordered and efficient urban development patterns (Urban Form
Goal 1, page 13);
b. The awarding of surplus allotments will properly direct
Population and vigorous growth for :Moorpark (Population and
Urban Growth Goal 1, page 1,� -);
c. The awarding of surplus allotments will help protect the
environment by providing an adequate quality of life
(Population and Urban Growt} Goal, page 15);
e. The awarding of surpl,is allotments will provide an
assurance to all residents o Moorpark a safe, health, stable
and pleasant living environment with economically and socially
diversified residential nelhborhoods (Residential Goal 1,
page 15);
f. The awarding of surplus allotments provides a reinforced,
controlled, orderly, and phased development while discouraging
urban sprawl (Public Facilit es and Services Goal 3, page 28);
g. The awarding of surpi-Ls allotments helps to provide
adequate housing to meet the needs and desires of all
residents (Housing Goal 1, l ge 29p;
h. The awarding of surplus a:.: otments promotes viable and safe
residential neighborhoods (Ji) using Goal 6, page 29);
i. The awarding of surplus ai.iotments protects the public
health, safety and welfare f all. :3egments of the community
(Social Goal 1, page 30);
j. The awarding of surpl.s allotments will provide a
reasonable balance between land uses and transportation
facilities.
Housing Element:
a. The awarding of surplus allotments will ensure that an
adequate provision of decent, safe housing for all Moorpark
residents without regard for race, age, sex, marital status,
ethnic background or other ari it r ary conditions ( Overall Goal ,
page 36).
b. The awarding of allotment, will promote the City's goals,
Policies and objectives i promoting the inclusion of
�o
affordable housing in res_dentiaL developments (page 46
General Plan).
SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption
of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTEL this day of
1991.
Mayor, City of Moorpark, California
ATTEST:
Lillian E. Kellerman
City Clerk
I FT-1
13-6
Vl
CL
CD
PART S
-+
ME:
m
PART A
r Protect Number /Applicant Name
D
x
T
do z
Project Number /Applicant Name
a o: �e,ernt oniConeervnt on
r
T
7
n
�
z
O
x•
i
I A -5 School 7mnect
d
(-CD
d
II a
T
a z '. a. •s; Eq,:est ' an, Trails
i
N
I
tD
- -
F-�
e
B -1 Building Design Quality
A -6 Zraffic impact
_prcjsct NA
1
N
.-
J
CD
I g -9 .cp graphic
_
A -1 Water Supply Impact
O
fl I n -2 0;,nn Spnaa /Slope Landscape
O
B -10 Archaeological Sites Impact
O~
B -3 Site i Architectural,
tL7
A -2 weetewnter Service Impact
Design Quelit
�
0
B -4 Provisions of Useable Open Space
~
(:D
O
H -11 Low Cost Housing
~
O
_I
:
A -3 Storm Water Drainage
-� 3-5 Trees - Impact
lTl
Flood Control
rr
CD
70
CD
13-6
Vl
CL
CD
r-t
1J�/
rn
<�mr7
i
Q
x
T
do z
13-6
r+nte; Conservation
m�
�-
a o: �e,ernt oniConeervnt on
T
7
n
(
O
I A -5 School 7mnect
II a
T
a z '. a. •s; Eq,:est ' an, Trails
- -
e
I
A -6 Zraffic impact
_prcjsct NA
O
.-
J
I
i ---
I
I g -9 .cp graphic
_
v,
B -10 Archaeological Sites Impact
U1 l
i
Comnunity Improvements
�
O
H -11 Low Cost Housing
~
O
_I
:
�J1
Flood Control
rr
CD
w
8 -12
Absence of Deleterious Impact
~O
Ul
Pointe
"'0
-7)
M
M
X
II -13
Provisions of Needed Public
�:D
O
N
O
Facilltles
rt
CD
-
CT
Pointe
Available Points
b
m
r-t
CU
X
--�
r-t
CD
Q
Percentage
O
�
N
pp
O
l•
Available Points
r-t
—
O
r-t
F -•
Cc
CL)
O
Percentage
.-
0 9
EXHIBIT 2
CITY OF MOORPARK - (:f)MMITNI'['Y DF ;Vi:i.OPMFNT DEPAR'TMEN'T'
/d
DEVELOPMENT ALIXr'! Kr Application Form
( — RECEIVED —
SUBMITTAL APPLI ca1TiON AU 6 2 1 1991
City of Moorpark AlIotrr t i,pp1 i,- nt:ion No.: CITY OF MOORPARK
Community Development Dept. Appli(: i)rt {eo
799 Moorpark Avenue Receiv,i
Moorpark, California 93021 Date t ei
(805) 529 -6864 Re(-. e1, �.
NOTE: Prior to the submittal of the app,, ,tti.)n, it is advised that the applicant discus
the requested proposal with the Departme i-1 ox ~ier to review the requirements of th
Residential Development Management Syster, n comtleting the application form, please b
as accurate and complete as possible f you should have any questions or requir
assistance, contact the Community Develc,pmf D-jE at -t meat.
APP W t CANT
Applicant: f' •r1
Address:
Phone:_-
-- Contact Per
Architect:
Address: -
�/ Phone:
— - 1�___Contact Per , l f" r ui lC r�
12 ; (i9 /f37
Engineer: ��� a. Sass -13
- -- - - - - -- -- ---- - - - - --
Address: GG
Phone: ��Y_ %a �� Contact Per°
r
Property Owner; /�JT��wG! G4.
Address:
Phone: ----Contact Per.
(Attach additional list for multiple own(.i Mini
AwrrMEN'r REQUEST
I hereby request a Development Allotment b av rdec± for the following project:
Case No.: 0"01 - QC -/ 2 _2� '2
the request is for an Allotment of
ciw(� ing units from the total of
dwelling units, which would leave
i'ri's without allocation contained in the
project. The project has __ un �- which are not sold or built. A map i<
included with the submittal showing th(, c �t i�r� of '_he units regciested if the project is
proposed to be phased.
The subject project is classified as her: in rho �rl��, „��
— 7.one and is
approved/ __ —_ pending. It
e irnj(� -Y is approved, indicate
expiration date:
R - ,,is(`"� 1"/03/;11
�ZY
CER'I IFIC'ATION
This application can only be filed
if
Iroj« -ct
has a previously
approved tentativ
subdivision and RPD
permit application
pr
'o the
established failing
period.
Measure "F ", the Residential Development anagement System of the City of Moorpark, ha:
been in effect since November 4, 1986. arohjbi?s the issuance of building permits fo:
• residential project (except certain exer :if proj --:.S) until and unless
• Development Allotment has been obtaine„ 'i Development Allotment is basically a right
to proceed, subject to all other app Ij a e requ rements, with all steps necessary t(
construct a residential. unit, including n :e c a permit. building g rmit.
F (If construction
has not commenced within two years of nw,t f I `Ovelopment Allotment, the City Council
may revoke it.)
During 1987 and each year thereafter un,
Ordinance to award Development Allotment,
minus up to 10 , at the Council's disc r 1
Measure "F" itself. All eligible project,
is filed in accordance with the appl icat r
Development Allotment.
the City Council is permitted by the
cr _'Stl residential dwelling units (plus or
certain adjustments, as specified in
r c.h h� a Development Allotment application
.c 1 ! i'"'Ilts, will be considered for award of
R��ised 12/09/87
APPLICANT'.. S SIGNATURE
15
( An application may be filed only by th,, �wrer of the property or by a person with th
power of attorney from the owner authori n; 01, application, or by the attorney -at -la
representing the owner Indicate your 3u, rty
'K
_ I am the owner of the pry° er t .
Y
I have the power of att,ia y from the property owner authorizing
the application arc ,i c>py f the authorization is attached.
I am the attorney- at -lao. �'pr�sonting the owner and a copy of the
authorization is 1c i,�d
I (We) , wC'S7 r
being
duly sworn do depose and say that (1) (wF} aml 'aie) the owner(s) or applicant(s) hereir
named and that the foregoing statement n c�n;saer, herein contained and the information
herein submitted are in all respects trur� i rr,rr, .t. to the best of (my) (our) knowledge
and belief.
Signature j
print) Date
Rc'v i se<I 12/09/87
OWNER'S CONSENT
CONSENT BY OWNER
IZ2
If applicant is other than owner /, owner muv; ,ign c()nsenting to filing.
I (We),�sr��r� �o
(am) (are) the owner(s) of the subject piopPrt,, and consent to the filing of thi.
application.
Signa � f { lwner Date
4?z
PARCEL, iVFORMATION
Property Acquired (date) %
Legal description s<<_
Property Location
Assessor Parcel No.
Cross Street (s)
Current Zoning — A15, f/ If g j
- - -- _ - _ Parce 1 Area 3s y�
General Plan Designatior7
16,v sod 12/09/87
O7ILl7Y S��J<%l3
�
(Existing Fucilitios/Pr"p'vp6 Fa(-`lities):
WATER
Existing
size/location
Proposed
Length of extension to s'
-n~ n,operty
AGENCY
/
----'
SEVER
Existing
size/location
9rnposod
—/ ���/'x»/
/� �
Length of
extension to
v° prop`rty AJ
AGENCY
GAS
Existing
size/locatln/,
/�V� y?���________
Proposed
.
Length of
extension to
rr Drnp,rcy
----/~~'
/
\
AGENCY
----
ELECTRICITY
Existing uizo/locatloc
Proposed
ol
_ !/
Length of
extension to
&GF0CY
DRAINAGE
Existing size/location
� ---'
Proposed
_ A 1 (
6'�0�°(
7.eng/h Of
o`toosion to `,`
« |u t
AGENCY
orocr±6o proposed
metho'6 of
,nu»mrvatim' .
w.te, �.J ,00zgy�
k,ri,"'! l?/0n/8/
Previous
applications:
BPD
-
rrvct q C
Dates of
expiration:
BPD
[,,`ct
/
\
Total number of dwelling nojtn in ycnje''
Total number of dwelling units rugnent,`'` aq
Anticipated construction date for each 1)}/v
J
Number of dwelling units for each phase:
Attach a map indicating phasing plan.
/
ylt
Describe existing features and proposed r)/a�x,� (a��ach grading plan)
Topography
Existing Vegetation/Buildings
Archaeological Features
--
Rr., i srd
-
DEVEI/,pMENr PRX)PO3A[
-
\ Type of building proposed
-----7'-
/
Type of construction
Building height '
'�"m6rr of -�tozics ('
Access: Existing e
- -'- -- -----------
Proposed / ,4
Circulation: On Site
Parking spaces: Enclosed
Open � ' *
/y�v
1���.
% Lot Coverage
Site Paving ^
% Site Open Space }
--
Site in Slopes
Price Range 7 61
�--
Siz, of Dnits
�/�� ��!8�M t���/�(Type/color/finish/to,,,, `�
^` �
/ ��-----
Roofing '
' Walls
�-------
Trim/Accents
Windows
Other Elements
]{nw does the project provi6v linkages x pu6Ii, facilities, such un` ot,ilitie"
or streets?
.�
` � ��rx CK
Xorir'! l2/69/n7
: ao
What contributions does the project for •xtending greenbelts, bike paths, op,
space areas, etc.?
What provisions does the project provf,i,, or off-site private/public open spa(
areas and facilities?
1 P (": i � (' (1 12 / n q / 8 7/
APPLI( ATION MATERIAL
DEVELOPMENT PLANS
ez�
The application package shall include c lies of the development plans. The developme
plans shall include grading plan, site 1 ar:s, f -cr plans, exterior elevations, buildi
sections and roof plan. A perspective <lr,�± v ir,g or iodel is optioual.
The site
plan shall show
all areas E.
)posed for
landscaping, parking,
circulatio
loading,
pedestrian areas,
building areas
and 91j( h.
The landscaping areas
shall inclu(
an indication of the types and sizes l tq,� plint materials and the treatment of tl
topography including walls and grading. e ;ire plan shall be supported by scale, nor
arrow, legend, title, designer's name ii i,ldre,s, information and data (such as Ic
coverage percentages, number of parkin,; p, i( es, zone classification, etc.), easement;
setback dimensions, property dimension,', aric indication of the environmental featurF
(including existing topography, vegetnt-r oind urrents, and shade sun
/ patterns). T1
development plans are to be folded so h t�ev ire ready for distribution via mailing
The maximum size after folding is 12" fi✓ (5) copies of the development plans ar
required. It is urged that material,;
s izc wherever pons i_ble to provid
applications more manageable in sia.E�,. Ir�io�rm<k. ion on reduced plans must still b
legible. Booklets should be no larger hi 1 1,,` " 1411
.
FILING FEE
Before an a
application can b
be a
accept(,( 1
1 R�tis (,ci
12/09/("�;
PHASING PLAN
� Indicate the
proposed method of phas ng wit} daik lines separating the phases and lab
each area by phase number. Indicate which phases(s) is (are) being requested f
Development Allotments and discuss the }-r —on(d t ning for the development of the phases.
APPL IC M ON MA'T'ERIAL
SUPPORTING DATA OR EXTiIBITS
An applicant is free to submit any addit
data to support and supplement the req.i,
respond to the criteria used for estall
reference the corresponding section w}i
additional pages to the application whet
8-1/2" x 11" CLEAR ACETATE REDUCTION
nal material in the form of exhibits, text c
er.i application material. The material shout
>hing tEle project rating standards and shoul
is being supplemented. Please attach an
q'sitp nnnce is not available.
A reduced transparency of the developm(,r,t p i',n i,< required as part of the application
The transparencies are used in the staff r,: >o -t And at the Planning Commission meeting fot
display purposes. The transparencies gh(, . " no larger than 8-1/2" / x 11" and should bE
Of clear acetate material suitable for use
t W— }1oad pro ject:or.
8 -1/2" x 11" COPY OF PLANS
It is required that one (1) reduce, c<,,_, f LID, ievelopment plans and phasing plan be
submitted. The reductions should he rx t, "'
'� l x 1 ]'�. It is important that t }1e
quality of the reduced prints he goodt�
hat they may be photocopied for the
agenda packets for the IdesiOntial Develcl,'s KI M t ion Board Qnd City Council.
Eevis�i 12/09/87
ATTACHMENT 1 -�
• RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION OF THE MOORPARK ,, Y (OUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA ADOPTING A RESID'i,i `,L iiEVE �.JPMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the City Council 0 �ie I;it.y of Moorpark has directed staff to
prepare an implementation resolution rv,' 1 recar,i to the Residential Development
Management System adopted by the citizor f ',00r; irk by passage of Measure F on ine
November 4, 1986 Municipal Election; in,'
WHEREAS, the Moorpark Plann9r :,)mm,,sion has reviiewed and considered
the Draft Residential Development Managcm�nt Syst „m on July 10, 1987 and August 3,
1987; held duly noticed public hearing< r - :cnsider the draft allotment system; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Comm ,s on recommended to the City Council
approval of the draft allotment system i °, hr =ir - ecommendation dated August 3, 1987;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the ;..r
Quality Act (Division 13 of the Public.
(beginning at Section 21000)}, an enr.
accordance with the City's adopted Envi
been determined that the proposed
qualifies for a Negative Declaration,
the office of the Clerk of the Count
adopted Environmental Guide''ines.
FOLLOWS:
v1sions of the California Environmental
esource, Code of the State of California
r-nmentil assessment has been made in
mental 'sidelines, and as a result it has
i 1F,n, �,iI Development Management System
a Declaration has been filed in
f Jest ri in accordance with the City's
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY (O' 11 '( �F T�1E CITY OF MOORPARK DOES RESOLVE AS
SECTION
1. The City C�,
-rc -ereby finds and determines that the
Residential Development
Management
Sy,'t-i
w 11 n)t
have a significant effect on the
environment and that
the Negative
Dec':
fn way
filed with the Clerk of the County
of Ventura.
SECTION
2. Based upon
,e ,toff
report and the evidence and
testimony received at
the public
hear -i
t!ie
ty Council hereby approves of the
proposed Residential
Development
Many;
exit System
as provided in Exhibit "A”
attached hereto, and
ncor) orated
heir,
r(,fc
•ence as though fully set forth at
this point.
SECTION 3. The City
resolution and shall cause this
in the office �)f the City Clerk
ATTEST:
City Clerk
sha "1 certify to the adoption of this
o ct,or, and his certification to be filed
1, 9�
i
i
) 41-:t 7�
int. Harper, City of Moorpark, CA.
r �L
SECTION 3. F_STABLISI[ fF.NT OF RESIDF—'_i _1 EVELCPMENT EVALUATION BOARD In order`_
- I _
to administer the system set forth in 1 resol ition a Residential Ue g lofmthe
Evaluation Board (hereinafter called �h�� card) s established, consisting
dull► appointed members of the Planning; °� �7m ss7.ar' of the �';ity. The procedures and
by -laws of the Board shall )e developed
[ >ubl c bearing by the Board subject to
the approval of the City Council. Th � m� T� i t v lirvelopmetTt Department of the City
shall serve as the staff of the Board.
SECTION 4.
_1DENT_AL
ESTABLISHMENT OF ANNUAL RI ST
f BUILDING DEVELOPMENT ALLOT"tEYIS
The number
of residential development 3
otrTent,; that are allocated each calendar
in the
City for non- exempt dwellir g;
a its
hall be as provided by all of the
year
provisions
of Initiative Ordinances or
v �uccv;s,or
ordinance. The City Council
shall establish by resolution the av+ll
i', it.v
f Development Allotments annually
prior to review
of the Boards recommlT,
tic,n
-r:d based on the provisions of the
Initiative
Ordinance
SECTION 5. ALLOT"1FNI' RE. U2 IRFD FOR 11
building permit for nocr- exempted Ii
f Allotment for such project has been g,T
1 an allotment awarded within an apprc-- i
Development Allotment entitlement ar' n
utilities or other infrastructure inl—
by the City Engineer and Director
purpose and intent of Mew;ure- F and
a manner so as to « +l iminnte damage h, ,
of such grading as deemed appropriate
L1,I�G OR GRADING PERMITS No residential
is mad be issued unless a Development
grading permit may be issued after
1 3rn"d '7ovelopment Zone and outside of the
i ,pic9 is required to extend streets,
on,o it,; o long as such grading is approved
nrTnTr, y Development consistent with the
ar 17 +a.s treated with landscaping in such
o IrI)sioin and to reduce the visual impacts
le hii�ctor of Community Development.
SECTION 6. DF.VF,I,OPME.I -l' ALLO'I'i1F.NT
A. Film); After 9t v )f ;1[ Planned Development and Tentative
Tract Map 1titlr °r� r ,� Tr�;id�ntial project under Article 19
of Chlpter 1 of Or(iinrince, or any successor
"Idill tnre an npl�l t ,;�' � i 1� fr)r I D,'velr,pment 1%11otment.
SECTION 7
DF,VFLOPiTENT ALLOTMFNT_FRQ�F`-- -
A. Tentative Point Ratiggs
Tract Map and a
Commission shall nSs F
evaluation system tort.
the entitlement apprII' -f
terms of absolute 11r'n
number of points awnr
The maximum number
elements of the crt
Community Development
agencies.
B. Hoard Recommend atical
I. Public hearing
not later tl- ;Fili.
the previous T
tentative Pc 11
(15) days ,-1 (
review each r
nccordance w "
`system) in
Assigned ev"
accordance w t
from part.
developments,
greatest
receiving
posting s+,,
lionrd. Ill
nwnrded in
be tot n l e
percentage
rilflximum n',,- dement
1
a�
.N�; part of the approval of a Tentative
nned Development Pe.rmit,the Planning
.entat,ve point ratings based on the
conjunction with
n,,c _1;1 Section in J
71,e atings will be expressed both in
r and as a percentage of the maximum
fl:- each subsection of Section 9.
;olnts awardable shall not include those
-il fauad to be not applicable. The
,pq,- tml =,., t will coordinate review by other
n,e Board shall hold a public hearing
11C- month of August for applications filed
e to ,valuate the Planning Commission's
rr,tirg f the projects. At least fifteen
c '_1!1, public hearing, the Board shall
to determine that each is in
p3r..; A and B Section 9 (Evaluation
r� tr, ar_h of these c_riteri.a; and having
i n c fits; on a scale of zero to ten in
ticic inding, documenting points awarded
;l :,r, c B of Section 9, arranging the
1;st in order from that receiving the
r llr,bc of evaluation points t o that
�:tmbe.r and shall publish the lists by
t,c 'ity hall Public Nearing; Notice
t Isti11 g the number of actual point s
of both parts, each pill t will
shrG 1 1 the.tl he expressed n; n
I
IT' ,Y n'un nnmh r t�f point s nwllr<inh'
t nwilydnhlc hull not include tjjo;r,
i,i found to he not nppl icnhle.
(i i) he Board sha
dividing the
i
available p,,y
system to Jars•
percentage ,,
with subs« 1
1 nnk l order these applications 1,9 :::?::,- 7
"commen,(iecl Point Rnting by the total -�---
indicated in the evaluation
t. s; a`' hest
ace c1 ?ercentage score. The highest
i „� �cation s hall be ranked first
ppii
n j, .reasing per scoring
applications
n�x.Fd .,1 <fescending order.
4. Board Recommends` i
shall forward its
of each applicati
September 31st-
to be forwarded '
at least for -V
absolute points
Facilities an(',
n to the _Cit_ Y Council - The Board
commend "'d point rating and the ranking
t> that City Council not later than
e Board will not cause any application
he Crt =� Council which does not receive
=e'nt (49 %) of the available
1tcti,,t 9.A• (Availability of Public
vi es) and at least seventy percent
(70,) of the,
9.B.(Quality of I
"a . 7 ab l' absolute points in Section
";r ln(i Contribution of Public Welfare
and Amenity),
?t )y w it.ten request from the applicant
within three {
Sy , f rot °, she Boards decision.
C. City Council Permit Allotf —I
1. Public Hearing
hearing neon
"Ile City Council shall
i }t cif the recommendation
hold a public
of the Board.
The hearing <. r3
to 1, ld not later than
the month of
October for r31 1
f i le,i in .June.
Notice of the
henring steal'
gi��,.n t_he same manner
as provided in
Se.ctlon 7(b)(6
2 Public_Te st_iru r,
the -- Council
- I u in the course. of the public henring
v,! public testimony and shall
consider t1,f'
,oint rnting rind
ranking of erich
f1ppl icnL ion ' a
any npplicn °_
t 1 ,d [ orn the 11oi11d, and
3 �.;i}lrmeilt of poir:t
may re— evaluate
rntins;s tlnd
:C113ki11�;.
I. Water Service Ef f is is ru :nd Iml act
Points shall be ,w,il ed in accordance with Part (i) below.-
Points shall also 'warded in accordance with Part (ii)
below. No applicat i r >l,ill T,orQ more than a combined total of
ten (10) points.
(i) Water Supply__lm "_t
Points Standard
10 The ent i r project can meet domestic and fire flows
without r :ther transmission pipeline, pumping
station, -torn, tank improvements which involve
no net en 01 roinr ibutions by the water purveyor.
g The pi,, ,t ( onnists of less than twenty (20)
dwellin A:ts it nn existing; pressure zone that has
insult i ❑t nto:,age available, but has sufficient
fire -i! 3 to -, .y operating storage.
6 The hr, j t .ons)sts of less than one hundred (100)
but it P s, r 1 ;Pnty (20) dwelling units in an
existi� T �: ;. ne that has insufficient storage
nV01 - i suff''ciont fire and dny -to -day
npe r it I
SECTION 9. EVALUATION SYSTEM
The 1c
lcwing ,)pint
evaluation system
shall 7e
used to evaluate all applications for
a i v�
onmor;t
allotment:.
A. Availability of Public
points are awardable,
Fa"
w'11
ties and
,tow
Services Sixty total
al for additional t on
points �r
more under (Section 9 .
A. - I
q t„ 1pl
l ic.able.
I. Water Service Ef f is is ru :nd Iml act
Points shall be ,w,il ed in accordance with Part (i) below.-
Points shall also 'warded in accordance with Part (ii)
below. No applicat i r >l,ill T,orQ more than a combined total of
ten (10) points.
(i) Water Supply__lm "_t
Points Standard
10 The ent i r project can meet domestic and fire flows
without r :ther transmission pipeline, pumping
station, -torn, tank improvements which involve
no net en 01 roinr ibutions by the water purveyor.
g The pi,, ,t ( onnists of less than twenty (20)
dwellin A:ts it nn existing; pressure zone that has
insult i ❑t nto:,age available, but has sufficient
fire -i! 3 to -, .y operating storage.
6 The hr, j t .ons)sts of less than one hundred (100)
but it P s, r 1 ;Pnty (20) dwelling units in an
existi� T �: ;. ne that has insufficient storage
nV01 - i suff''ciont fire and dny -to -day
npe r it I
0 All oche. p' c 00
(ii) Commun i tylmprovPM-
Points Standnt f
5 The prn
t, ai l l provide one or more needed
(i) Wastewater Capacity Lmprct
r systc" improvements, as determined
by the
City
.&,;e required to existing ordinance to
Points
Standard
To Iti !
t ,. rnprovements must he judged
by the
west ,G. t
r uiiv y,, ns being; of suhstnnLinl
benefit:
be
provided to
the project
10
Was tewet�r
sLewnter
Put,
without
ut rr
xrsting system improvements which
involve
o,t
ontributions
by the
waterworks
purveyor
g
Treatment:
pant
-8pacity
exists but
the project
requires
-"ite lower
line
improvements.
6
Treatment
p.rnt
capacity
exists but
the project
require-
f -rite
;ewer line
improvements.
q
TreatmPl t
plaint
capacity
does exist,
but project
propono
lie wrstcwnter
lift station
units.
2
Any coil
�it,tion
of two
or more of
the impacts
ident _f
n the
criteria
above.
0 All oche. p' c 00
(ii) Commun i tylmprovPM-
Points Standnt f
5 The prn
t, ai l l provide one or more needed
wastvw o
r systc" improvements, as determined
by the
City
.&,;e required to existing ordinance to
sati"I
9n y�Lic requirements of the project.
To Iti !
t ,. rnprovements must he judged
by the
west ,G. t
r uiiv y,, ns being; of suhstnnLinl
benefit:
ou
170Undn7 [es rind mtu•;t- not:
rc�lulrF�
(Iir�
�, � l parLi :iprit ion by the wn
sLewnter
Put,
! ,,, )
4. Fire Protection
Points shall be awarcc'
Points shall also
accordance with Part
more than i combined
(i) Fire Pr.otectiofx
Points Standard
36
n IC(ordance with Part (i) below.
from the Part (i) score in
No application shall score
t ri 1'.)) points-
10 Project p .c:es a flew fire station or provides
major e(It,t ert ?r major equipment housing at no
financi�'I t e i},ar ion by the Fire District.
10 Fifty J-1 t or more of proposed dwelling
unit; az !1 1) mile driving distance of an
existing rncric'ually committed fire station.
7 Fifty { F' , t '(Y" ) or more of proposed dwelling
units 17 )riI ao (2) miles driving distance of
an exi�," actually committed fire station.
3 Fifty i' ='') or more of proposed dwelling
units f'e (3) miles driving distance of
an exi, cr concri,. tually committed £ire station.
0 All otlL- r( j e (
0 All oth, i
Ni) _ Community Impr�k t nt!,
Yoints Stnndai i
S to 10 The p -ol t t.rll )rovide needed school district
lmprei- n t° , Iq determined by the Moorpark t1nified
School t r I r . c YOrld those ner.ded to satisfy . the
City i ronwnt!� for the project. To
qunl I( t A in,i0voment s must be judged by the
school being; of substnntinl benefit
heyol { i 'icd t hruoy'Ji r<"qu i rod fens and mu ;t
II(A r 1 r ct f innnr.W part icipntion by the
scho"
6 The nppr(j)
iat,! sc IcOI has the capacity to absorb
the Chi !W
I -yp"CL "' to inhabit the project without
necessitat.
'g = ncding to double sessions or other
unusual c
c,r,ing or classroom overcrowding at any
two of
levels, Rs determined by the
Moorpark
Iool District.
4 The appr �,
i it e school has the capacity to absorb
the c, i i
en oxi ec:ted to inhabit the project
without i .
e ;s it at Ynn or adding to double sess ion's
or ot! e
unu� 18 scheduling or classroom
overcrow r
R r t a.ny one level, as determined by the
Moorpark
it ied n hool District.
1 The es t . n
t e i r;cL u:c ] impact of the project can be
nccommod1,
�d O[C if mitigation measures are
requirew
31r, provided without financial
partic K i
c i `., , he School District at one or more
levels,
ceip-m nod by the Moorpark Unified School
_ llistr i <
0 All oth, i
Ni) _ Community Impr�k t nt!,
Yoints Stnndai i
S to 10 The p -ol t t.rll )rovide needed school district
lmprei- n t° , Iq determined by the Moorpark t1nified
School t r I r . c YOrld those ner.ded to satisfy . the
City i ronwnt!� for the project. To
qunl I( t A in,i0voment s must be judged by the
school being; of substnntinl benefit
heyol { i 'icd t hruoy'Ji r<"qu i rod fens and mu ;t
II(A r 1 r ct f innnr.W part icipntion by the
scho"
(ii) Community Imprrw men`--
Points Standard
5 Project. rc' vides for the construction of a
connec+:ini treet link in the system of streets
listed he I'!Oorpark General Plan Circulation
Elemen':.
2 Project pt,v:.r(,s f;)r the construction of a portion
of the to igth of a connecting link; or the project
provides he wi(:ening of an off-site, existing
street s'cd n the Moorpark General Plan
CircuIati emen
0 A11 oth.(•r it ) ;ect .
7. Tentative Tract Map
Points Standard'
10 points Tentat i- tract rn,ip for the project was approved by
per yr. the C•t: r or '.:( November 4, 1986 but after 1984.
B. ualit of_Desi n and tr Amon itv
One hundred and twenty { ' ) tr,t gal paints are nwardable.
1. Des�n (duality _ Bi, i iin) s N') more than ten (10) points shall be
nwnrded pursuant I , r r t_r is below.
"111(" exterior app,—, _ <) I ho project should relate with the
existing; charnctor t i �m- f t}te wren, e11h11nce the surrounding;
vici11 i,y, he w t'1 all Adjacent 11111 (1 uses, and
+,nnintnin a irig;h =�. + r -1 nndnrd ()f (10vOloI)m(,nt. Standards
t0 1) o1 s rcri
- ,33
Compa ibiiity IIIe project is esigned
enh+Ir
on 17,C, 'Ind be Appropriate with
tl,« Jacenr and uses.
Points Standard
6-_1.0 The pro jec.' 11 ch L to -t -ure represents excellent
design it -rm< of III the above standards
1 -5 The pro jc -c m,�ttts I majority of the above
standar&e .
0 All othe, rojects
2. Open Space and Lands,.,; ir,g
No more than ten (, ( lcint: shall be awarded pursuant to the
criteria below.
The project should ;n )rp()rat- plant materials that help absorb
sound, act as a I et to he air, curtail erosion, provide
shade, and mainta Lr i'.'r r: w . Standards to be considered are as
follows:
Landscape buffer ,, d!,( aped areas are provided to minimize the
impacts of the i r e ;+- n �i maintain A gradual transition
internally between er and externally with the adjacent land
rises and secure a G ible elationship among the uses.
Amount of landsc,ip ; Meant i ty, size, and type of plant
mnteri,ils corresl ( land uses proposed, taking into
Ac(.ollnt the intei<<,
3. Desi n 9uality - Situ nd "!KkIng
No more than ten ( '?
'criteria below. T' -,
the character of
psychological needs
considered within t
design on the An
priority. Standar,
follows:
Site
31-/
F -pints shall be awarded pursuant to the
t l tic ut is very important in creating
r;,, x,,. . The physical, social, and
t h Q users of the project should be
i,s,g,. The impacts of the proposed
n' land uses should also be a major
irr sit* design to be considered are as
Setbacks
- The bul
.iings are
setback from the street and
adjacent
property ',
�r ough to
enhance the appearance of the
project
and to pr "t—
An is �rs
of the project.
Signage - The plat: r �t 3i d design of the signage is compatible
with the project ini i- F ad icent land uses.
Security - The o rc. creates a secure physical and
psychological en%i -( "ician b) _h for the site and its occupants.
Buildings are deg ;_isr i t) it ow surveillance of parking areas to
detect opportunil n i r"i: ,gat action.
Walls - Physical erration
unattractive, no n 04 n
beLween the prof( *c id pa
"brash and refus,, c t i +..
or odors are lo, ,, l *•�
uses or the or, r *7
focal point of n i V 41
is used to minimize the impact of
the project and to act as n buffer
ent land uses.
areas - Areas which generate noise
`.1,ey will not disturb adjacent land
+h, project and are not the visual
larking area.
nuts i,le storaf;e l r.t ie st orage arms are screened from
PUMP view and r n, PP land uses.
_3S
Privacy -• Site design OW tIoG,r i>lan layout is organized to
� provide privacy for t
�<:� u; pints of the project and the
adjacent land uses.
Fire access - The pr, -) n4 e�:s >rr -site Eire hydrnnt ;and on-site
emergency access stanot i s rcf;�rl �ted hV the fire department.
Building separation e rP�grt of the buildings dictates the
distance between the k ill.n�,,s to insure privacy and perceived
openness for the oc- :11 "I" project and the adjacent land-
uses.
Lighting - Lighting to provide security and visual
interest, but the l not impact adjacent land uses.
Pnr kin g
The major concern wtrf n
fitting all the t( i.
providing ample tr
pedestrian circul it i
radius, having Ill
maintaining a pleas, n
locations, and int��t
development_ Stnn_i,r
are as follows:
iesignirg a parking lot is not limited to
ed a i,ng on -site, but also includes
Ild i Is le widths, having a useful
;Y';t m, providing adequate turning
ef=i':r�nt traffic movement pattern,
p:�errrr nce, designing convenient parking
irk h� Farking with the charncter of the
k. i rag area (1-sign to be considered
Maneuvering areas 1';1 raneuvering requirements can he
accomplished entir T1re maneuvering area design is
not complex, and 1. 1. -ant ify and tanvigate.
Driveway location; I'rl'J "w y; provide a circulation pattern
which is convc.l, ill :rife. Pedestrian traffic is
111l,01por -rated into
C�
4. Provision of Useab f - )pen_ipgc._(,
_'L� .
No more than ten )otints ;hall be awarded pursuant to the
criteria below.
Points StnnOi
6 -10 The pro ,
- t prov
des usable public
or private
open
space,
AN n c+
as contributions
to areas
outside
of thy.
reject,
substantially in
excess of
adopted
Staniar
, lolis
,_es, and regulations.
Substantially
is de ;i
d for
purposes of this
section as
twenty
five w-
out WA)
or greater.
1 -5 The pr 7 prov des usable public and private open
spat" comp: ante with all adopted standards,
regulm I nc policies.
0 All )t °i
S. Deleterious Impact 'r p,!;
No more than five p"n s ;hall be awarded pursuant to the
criteria below.
The removal of io r3 cr di: !used trees or trees determined not
appropriate for I't t1"n, verified by the City, shall not be
counted among th , i I 1�0 ; c e s.
Po Cut S Stns 1 I--
Grad i � t ( 1t h in);, a ; shown on the approved
Fira[Iir 1 u , 11 impact five percent. (51) or fewer.
of 1 n l off -silo trees hnviug a diameter
0 f ! of mot c.
�7
Points Standar _
3 Energy ii(-,rwlat ons and energy budgets for dwelling
unit:; the ninimum energy requirements for each
dwe i r r rr_ t' M her than an overn 11 average as
Perm ", it .on 2-335"e) Title 24, Part 2 of
Cal:, r , <imi r:.trati_ve Code.
2 Dwell r _nits ire sited to maximize effectiveness
of In; vo solt r features considering sun angles,
wind 1 e:°ion, natural ventilation, and shading
device S in i a s ; lar access plan has been prepared.
2 A so] r .8 or hooting system, that is capable of
conser v ig K O Y percent (50:b) or more of the
unas> in �d we( tod Annual Water Heating Energy, is
inst i ] c r ��� �zy dwelling unit.
2 A "l'' i 'f rr :pace heating system that is
\ r
capaD 0 t ccn:•rving forty percent 40% or more of
unasi: ; i AXWn ted Annual Space Pleating Energy is
inst r; i c r ry dwelling unit.
2 }feat 1 r- s rrr' stalled in all dwelling units.
2 Every W i ink; r , it is pre - plumbed for solar water
heat t .r,
2 Southe r r cant, ion windows in every dwelling unit
are i ] th heavy projections, louvers,
shutt�, r�;l. or similar shading devices in a
nIZV% w n I P r hentin�
r, and summer
shad
r
9. Site and Architectural es i J1 Qua 1 i ty - Topog_ra 1p I'S
Cons iderat ion
M-
No more than ten Glt))o3nts ,troll be awarded pursuant to the
criteria below.
Points Standard
5 Project :i4 sign has kept grading to an absolute
minimum ,
order to maintain the natural character
of the h i !
sides Held to complement the natural land
forms.
ject ha. retained all significant natural
landmaik
inki oth*r natural outstanding features on
the si ^i.4-
T1te ^,ru lect has utilized varying setbacks
and he .,
tsc fc 1 buildings, varying building
techniq,t -
n�u; inique, building forms, materials and
colors k
whici ensure the compatibility of
buildi iF�
-i -it -Al( surrounding terrain. The street
and cir< <,
it °,can 6-1,3ign respects the natural contours
of tho
td, ri;;cmizes grading and minimizes the
percent, ,;,
( 1 III( devoted to streets. The project
remains,
t re':y below any ridgeline visible from
off -s ; t
tE 1r- -) ject site.
3 Project
's f,n 'I's kept grading to a minimum but
irnvol %
III ,llld Till slopes which will modify to a
minor
t1,0 •xisting terrain. The project will
not iii ,3
s i fi,n i I icant natural 1 andmnrks and other
rintur t`,
trrlrr; n the site.
0 nll o l
), c I, c .
r
l
i�
b. 12. Absence of Deleterirnu< impr ;ct <n *.he physical and /or Aesthetical
No more than ten 1 110 arc int,s hail be awarded pursuant to this
criteria below.
Standard
10 The proje
on air, w
takes iio%
and un r ,
uses, hrIs
of the �t
scenic
out of } r
.4 :.11 riot create any significant impacts
°.er flooding, plants, animals and noise.,
-cts;e C� natural features in its layout
ie,;ign, is compatible with adjacent land
design eatures which add to the quality
,y anal ci,Yes not significantly diminish any
«s.
Tie project does not take any land
,r t ,ve tvricultural use.
7 The pro j,
t _reates minimal
environmental
impacts
which +,_:
mitigated at
no
expense to any
public
agency r.
is coxnl atible
with
the adjacent land
vises
but dce,
>t ir:c,porate
any
exterior quality
design
enhancer, <
s !
:
of five or more residential dwelling r;
is whici are governed by the Residential
Development Management System and are I
rcv�d I-- the City during the term of this
/ o
SECTION 10.
CONDITION
ON DEVELOPMENT F'`Mi'
:.S
All entitlements for residential
entitlement will be :slued for the
development
subject to
this resolutaori
i :r.l >>ding,
but not Limited to
Planned
Development
Permits and
Major 'Mod ific -A
ur tc
units, wliic:.h are approved
by t:he
City during
the term of
this Resolutior
ir.11
Gr hject to a condition providing
Allotments may be modified during th:,
that permit
approval is
complete but
that the annual allocation for the ri e
.gill occur
and no
grading permit, building
permit, or t! c
t�<
ir, ttl�ment . >11 be issued
for the
project unless and until
a Development
first awarded.
SECTION 11. CONDITION ON SUBDIVISION- `t,'S Al tentative maps for subdivisions
of five or more residential dwelling r;
is whici are governed by the Residential
Development Management System and are I
rcv�d I-- the City during the term of this
Ordinance shall be subject to a corictl,
orr, prokidling that the final map may be
approved and recorded prior to awardirr,,
e �,� lopment Allotment but no right to
develop shall occur and no gradirns;
e r 11 l)uilding permit, or other City
entitlement will be :slued for the
unless and until a Development
Allotment is first awarded to the pl,
here a tentative tract map on a
subdivision of five car more units .r
i ",-rovc,i prior to the effective date of
Measure F, the final map may be App- ✓
i °id r- corded prior to the awarding of a
Development Allotment for land within
nk,divtsion, provided that no right to
develop shall occur and no gracii;
p"irnit building permit, or other City
entitlement shall be issued for the 1 �i
i, i h n the subdivision unless and until a
Permit Allotment is first awarded.
SECTION 12. ANNUAL DEVELOPMENT AL11,0
`TG [le annual allocation of Development
Allotments may be modified during th:,
n -1 of October by the City Council to an
amount not greater than ten percent
s for any s;iven year, provided
that the annual allocation for the ri e
rdcecAirg year shall be set higher or lower
as the case may be, in order to recir
I T1 eels or deficiency. No Development
Allocation shall bo awarded for the
i 1986, nor steal l any fut -ure annual
allocations drawn i :pen th(Allotmorn _
r 'i ornr 1986 by virtue of issuance of
2354 residential buildin,; permit;
the purpose and intent of
Measure F for the year
The City Council shall review such a
the modification as requested, modify t,
modification shall be granted only it
proposed modified project in relation r(_
".B., shall find that the major modif.
points than the original project for 4+
for a major modification shall be mncic
original application ovaluation points
Oit i t GAL 1011 ,app 1 ictit grnnt
)r deny the request. A ma jor
Council, after reviewing the
C, r R. r �.3 set forth iii Sect ion 9 . A. and
c 7 h,3 ; corned r�s tunny or more ova luat ion
t, l� >tment was issued. No approvals
�I T receiving iess points that the
ATTACHMENT 2
spa
RESOLUT
A.RESOLUTION OF THE I" C COU14CIL OF THE
CITY OF MOORPARK, L 'ORN 24ENDI*11 G
TLiE RESIDENT I:IL C'�`.
SYSTEM
WHEREAS, on Septemtle 23, 987, the City Council
adooted the Residential DevF^ ,, cm-nt. 14anagement System
pursuant to Resolution No. P' 421; ind
WHEREAS, the City ;:cancil ,ow desires to amend said
Residential Development Man<ac: �ment: 'ystem;
NOW, THEREFORE, TH1-: 'ITY CCUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLV �S FOLIOWS:
SECTION 1. The Ci,.,. Ccuncil hereby finds and
determines tnat the amendme:i~ tc t.t:c Residential Development
Management System will not -i,;1e a significant effect on the
environment and that a Nega %e Df-c]aration be filed with
the Clerk of the County of t .i r,: ,.
SECTION 2. The Ci, Ccuncil hereby approves the
amendment to the Residenti.a.., evelorment Management System
as set: forth in Exhibit "1 "' :t t <3 .�,, d hereto and
incorporated herein by rei-o CF,,
SECTION 3. Any lel act.i.r.n to challenge this
resolution, in wnole or it t, mu°t be filed in a court of
competent jurisdiction wit:t.;- t t': (30) days immediately
following t�-e passage and 3i :f this resolution.
S ECT ION 4. The Ci C1e;r; :.hall certify to the
adoption of this resolutiCI, I cause this resolution
and her cer .ific<:tion to the office of the City
Clerk.
PASSED, APPROVED LO' "�: D this 16th day
of November f
ATT EST :
C Ty CF ',!0CRPARK
A
S
C /AGa.,?0?
number f .cn--- -xemot residential
dwel? a oro ject consisting
of no, c.2 than 175 lots, in which
event e grading may be carried out
for r 1 aroject, or
3,
:.1
ant has been awarded
at Least 15 0 of she
numr -e
t nc.;r -
exempt residential units
in h(y
; rs,: :,ease
of a project
con , n s
: :q (::) t
:acre than 175 lots, in
w n n
;e,-t: t_ ~e
grading shall be
ca r r
c: u t:
chases. The phases
shat',
'_eIi.
eated by the
devf_,Lo
r.. Nc
phase shall consist of
more
r 5
lots. Grading of the
fir ,t
-.ase mc;(y
commence once 15% of
the ^:e
_,sar''�
allotments for that
phase
:vf,7 t }ec
°n awarded. Grading of
the le
>rc
and each phase
thei - +, _j
( i ix,
commence once 750 of
the
-a:-Y
allotments for the
pre :f
3:<3
e have been awarded.
The
c c!.i—
:i 1 may approve or
con(j.
r<,1 _,
:approve grading in a
mane( ,
r :;t ::
rerwise provided for in
t h i :
,r c °. i
)r: upon a finding that
.ii- a ;
rnce with the
pro ::
i
paragraph 2 or 3 would
worc
3 h
rti.al economic or
enc;i
rr :ship on the project.
Al l
(i i.
-: as shall be treated
wit -I
i ;c is
-not, as deemed
,,I PT
e
the Director of
Cor
1�cment, to prevent
grading and to
�np,:ct s cif the
(b) Paragraz:
3t .'
lod Street Traffic
Imoact
ion A, entitled
AvaiL.ib:
c acilit�ies and
E'nt]t!E'(
E;valu'at :.
r `k '"1
;` :.xilibl C i
rev 15t'(i
1 1 -1d as
EC)11n ".J :,
43
C
constructed or installed
or_oc to the time that
sufficient traffic
mirigation fees have been
c,cLlected to finance the
.mn rovement . To qualify,
�ho applicant must have
,aid, or have agreed to
pa,, any traffic
mi'igation fees normally
equired by the City, must
5ave provided, or agreed
~o provide, any street
improvements normally
required by the City, and
if the project is within
;he Los Angeles Avenue,
Tierra Rejada /Spring Road
r Cabbert /Casey Road Area
f Contribution, the
pplicant must have made a
"r Men waiver of any
:iM to protest payment
--f said Area of
_.r t: ibution fees to the
- Vent the fees do not
L eed the per dwelling
t: amount in effect as
t Cctober 31, 1988.
S "hp project will pay, or
nay= paid, all traffic
__•igation fees normally
:Pquired by the City, and
W_ 1 provide, or has
Ar vided, all street
:revements normally
:_ Kired by the City. If
' project is within the
Angeles :avenue, Tierra
i ada /Spring Road or
:n r Prt /Cn sey Road Area of
ibut'_on, to qualify
. ppl icAnt must have
P a wri r tan -.waiver of
:r right ro protest
i rrpnt of sAid Area of
t:ibut.un Fees to the
, nt t hp N s do nor_
A
1 T I O® R PA R K.
-
- - --
- - - --
STEVEN KLIENY r
JOHN GALLOWAY
the foregoing Resolution No.
City Manager
Mayor
-_
CHERYL J KANE
ELOISE BROWN
Mayor Pro Tem
f°
City Attorney
RICHARDS, A I.C.P.
CLINT HARPER. Ph.D.
�/�o .= 1
PATRICK
Director cl
Counclmember
Community Develooment
JOHN PATRICK LANE
Z
R DENNIS DEL =EfT
Councilmember
°, ''
?
���ty Engineer
MAUREEN W WALL
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
City Clerk
�-;hwt of Police
THOMAS P GENOVESE
City Treasurer
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF VENTURA ) SS.
CITY OF MOORPARK )
I, Maureen W.
Wall, City Clerk of
he City
of Moorpark, California, do
hereby certify
under penalty of per,
ry that..
the foregoing Resolution No.
88 -522 was
adopted by the C -ty
ourc 1
of the City of Moorpark at a
meeting held on
the _ 16th day )f
IO Ember°
1988 and that the
same was adopted try the following �c,t
AYES: Councilmembers Brown, i:r r, Per r_ and Mayor Lane.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Councilmember Galloway..
ABSTAIN: None.
WITNESS my hand and the official �(,, -f ;a'd City this _7th day of
— December , 1988.
Maureen W.
Wall, _-
City Clork
(Sea1)
�;,`"
ATTACHMENT 3
ORDINANCi
AN ORDINANCE OF THL :ITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK, CALIFORVIA AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL
CODE OF THE CITY ;F MOORPARK BY ADDING SEC-
TIONS 8. 02. 030 AND 8. 02. 040 REQUIRING LOW -
WATER CONSUMPTION 1_. T.1RES AND DEVICES.
_q_�)
WHEREAS, the use of low water consumption plumbing fixtures will
contribute to water conservat; n: an,:?
WHEREAS, a noticed public hear na has been held by the City Coun-
cil, at which time all intere tod pe +- -sons had the opportunity to
appear and be heard on the mat e• of - equiring Low Water Consump-
tion Fixtures and Devices;
NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY C-;C `JC IL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That Title 8 of the Moorpark Municipal Code is
amended by adding sections 8.0_03o and 8.02.040 to read:
8.02.030 Low Water Con, amt; lor, Fixtures The uniform
Plumbing Code, as adopte
Section 913 to read: -ereby amended by adding
Section 913 Low Water Con^ impt io_r_Fixtures
(a) Every tank -type watF
a design that requires njr,
flush and that has bee
dance with ANSI standard,
Table A and has been list
sociation of Plumbing a),_
my that it has been test>
ANSI standards as list "'
and has been approved fol
California by the Derr.!
Development.
closet installed shall be of
rrore than 1.6 gallons per
testecj and approved in accor-
s Muted in Chapter 2 of UPC,
Dy the International As-
Officials certify-
_3r,: demonstrated to meet
i' E'lapter 2 of UPC, Table A
1 3!: ion in the State of
�t dousing and Community
(b) Every showerhead 1-,,t
1,,'u s1,111 be of
type that limits the wat» r
an approved
f. iw t
Ions per minui;e. Such -3�
a maximum of 2.5 gal-
(
pressure equalization
e k,e,3c ',hall be supplied by a
'1
11 .�-, 1 ve.
Exception #1.
availability of the
;ocumentation of non -
l e 1 6
is f urn 1shed,
-rt; - P-1ush water closets
the Bui : r r
ternate fIxturrt
; f t :- 1,11 may approve an al-
design „
Of Section 10E i
,-- 1a„Cc, with the provisions
of tc� lr
h
adopted.
,
,' nt <,tr a
'-,it Code s
Exception #2. Whee documentation is furnished of
non - compatibility with existing plumbing systems due to
rough -in dimensions for •retrofitted water closets, or
when existing sewer gradient is insufficient to meet the
water - closet manufacturer'; installation instructions or
recommendations, the Buil:jing Official may approve an
alternate fixture design an accordance with the provi-
sions of Section 108 of ttk Jnifcarm Administrative Code
as adopted.
8.02.040 Bathroom Water_ Pipe Sizing The Uniform Plumb-
ing Code, as adopted, ;�, hereby amended by adding sub-
section 1009(n) to read:
Section 1009(n) Bathrooms Water Pipe Sizing Not-
withstanding the provisions of Subsections 1009(a)
through Subsection 1009!n)& whenever two or more fix-
tures are supplied by a conmon cold water supply and
whenever one of those f: tuv -es is a shower equipped as
required by Section 913(t) the cold water pipe supplying
those fixtures shall be i °r,mu«r 1 z of three quarter
inch.
SECTION 2. AMENDMENTS NECESSF4R
the Health and Safety Code of t
Council of the City of Moorpar
to the Uniform Plumbing or_,
reasonably necessary due tc
topographical conditions. i
climate with its frequent pert
stallation of water consery rc
necessary.
SECTION 3. SEVERABILITY, if
clause, phrase or word of this
to be invalid by a court of c,om
shall not affect the valid.. ty
ordinance. The City Counci �
passed and adopt ed this cer -_7
thereof, irrespect;ve of the f
provisions may t'e declared it „ 3
pursuant to Section 17958.5 of
e `.3tat- of California, The City
tieret:v finds that the amendments
made° by this ordinance are
:)c-a i climatic, geological, or
partGcular, the locally arid
JL, or- gater shortage make the in-
.,tO' <ixtures reasonable and
I',, sec'-ion, subsection, sentence,
orc9inal�ce is for any reason held
etcnt ;urisdiction, such decision
?' tMle remaining portions of this
" «ty declares that it would have
„r�d each and all provisions
any one or more of said
c.
t,
SECTION 4. The City Clerk sha;< certify to the passage and adop-
tion of this ordinance by the i -.ty Council; shall enter the same
in the book of original ordinar,: -es of said City; shall make a
minute of the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the
proceedings of the City Counc i at whach the same is passed and
adopted; and shall, within r,fteen (15) days after the passage
and adoption thereof, cause f sjme to be published in the man-
ner prescribed by law.
ATTEST:
PASSED AND ADOPTED t s l 't;' day of OCTOBER, 1990.
City Cler
r,'yo�i, of the City of Moorpark,
California
MOORPARK
-
6ERNARD0 M. PER
Mayor
SCOTT MONTGOMERY
Mayor Pro Tern
ELOISE BROWN
Councilmember
CLINT HAR °ER, Ph.D.
ao
Councilmember
q
PAUL W. LAWRASON, Jr.
Councilmember
LILLIAN KELLERMAN
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF VENTURA ) SS.
CITY OF MOORPARK )
�9
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J. KANE
City Attomey
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
RICHARD T. HARE
City Treasurer
I, Lillian E. Kellerman, City C1, r}: of the City of Moorpark,
California, do hereby certify tu- aer perialty of perjury that
the foregoing Ordinance No. I I
was adopted by the
-
City Council of the City of M(:)c -park 9t. a meeting held on
the 17th day of OCTOBER
1990, and that the
same was adopted by the folk)W i, ; %07C,_
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS BFt(1,.'I ;;RA S(N, MONTGOMERY AND MAYOR PEREZ
NOES: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER HAFT E
ABSTAIN: NONE
WITNESS my hand and the offic:ida se3i (-f said City this
18th day of OCTOBER
-- — -- 1')90.
Daro?
D. I ii' v