HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1991 0918 CC REG ITEM 09DITEM
MOORPARK
799 Moorpark Avenue Moon ark, California 9W2VPARK,(8.05) 529 -6864
Gty Council r.'
of g-
A
M E M 0 R .A„ 1� D_U M
TO: THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCII
FROM: Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community
DATE:
Development ?I
September 6, 1991 . (City :r- .incil. Meeting of 9- 18 -91)
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT ALLOTMENTS 19(. (DA- 91- 1) -ABE GUNY
Background:
Please refer to the attached memorandum dated July 291 1991 (see
Exhibit 1) regarding the Residential Development Evaluation Board
meeting (Planning Commission) and pudic hearing on August 5, 1991.
The applicant is requesting 18 development allotments from the 1991
year. There is a related item on the 9 -18 -91 City Council agenda in
which the applicant is requesti_r-1 surplus (1987 and 1988)
development allotments.
Discussion:
The point rating recommended by the Residential Development
Management Board is consistent with Resolutions 87 -421 (see
Attachment 1) and 88 -522 (see Attachment 27.
The application filed (DA -91 -1) is for 18 allotments to allow
development of City Council approved ''Tact No. 4652 ( Guny) approved
by the City Council on May 15, 1991
During the course of the public hearing on September 18, 1991, the
City Council shall receive testimony concerning its tentative point
rating for Tract 4652. At the publi hearing the applicant, Abe
Guny, has the opportunity to request that the City Council re-
evaluate the point assignment recommended by the Residential
Development Evaluation Board (RDEB) . 'Phe City Council has the final
authority to grant the development a locations to be awarded.
Since no applications for developmen, allotments were received in
1989 and 1990, there is currently :, surplus of 540 allocations
available for those years as well as 270 allocations available for
the current ( 1991) year. Council may :grant the applicant 18 surplus
development allotments and still. N abiding by the requirements
specified in Measure F.
PAUL W LAWRASON JR BERNARDO M PEREZ SCOTT MON I r a P +OY E_ TALLEY JP JOHN E WOZNIAK
Mayor Mayor Pro Tem (,',ounc,im, -rrr ouncilmember CounctImember
CI
MOORPARK a
799 Moorpark AverLW Moorpark, 3alifornia 93021 (805) 529 -6864
Staff Recommendation:
1. Evaluate the attached appli+7ation for DA -91 -1 and the point
rating (see Exhibit 2) approved by the Residential Development
Evaluation Board (RDEB), crid concur with the recommended
rating.
2. If concurrence is made wit:-, the point rating, approve the
attached Resolution of Approval for the 18 Development
Allotments (DA- 91 -1).
Exhibits:
1. Memorandum dated 7 -9 -91 . .1 J the Residential Development
Management Board
2. RDMS evaluation form for DA1 -1
3. Resolution of Approval No, _ (DA -91 -1)
Attachments:
1. Resolution 87 -421
2. Resolution 88 -522
3. DA -91 -1 Application Mater.i -a,s froze 7 -2 -91 letter from
Applicant.
KMP:KMP
A:DA91 -1
IA;VRAS( "N ,;-� FE ".ARCii f.1 '��Rt: - .1.)Y E ?A�. E Y JR JOHN E
RESOLUTION NO.9.-
A RESOLUTION OF THE MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, AWARDING DEVELOPMENT ALLOTMENTS FOR 1991 TO TRACT MAP
NO. 4652, ABE GUNY (DA 91 -1) (API`''s 511. - 110 -35; 511 -020 -025; 511-
020 -035; 500 - 260 -05; 500 - 270 -06)
WHEREAS, Measure F, an initiative ordinance establishing a
residential development management system, was approved by the
residents of the City of Mo(:rpark �',n November 4, 1986; and
WHEREAS, on September 23, X987, uhe City Council adopted
Resolution No. 87 -421, an implementation resolution setting
forth the process and procedures for issuance of residential
building permits under Measx..r-e F, and
WHEREAS, on November 16, 1988, the City Council amended said
Residential. Development Mana;,ement System ( Resolution No. 88-
522); and
WHEREAS,
pursuant to Measurt
1', after a duly noticed public
hearing,
the
Residential
Development Evaluation Board
concluded
its
review of the c,'.ly
project requesting allotments
for the 199.1
cycle, at _Lt's
meeting of August 5, 1991, and
forwarded
its
recommendata,x
to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, on September 18, 1 9i the City Council held a duly
noticed public hearing at which time it considered the
recommendations of the Boar:i and heard testimony from the
applicant for development: 1,c,t.ment.s and other interested
persons;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Coui,cil hereby finds and determines
that the purpose and intent of Measure F will
best be promo+ed by awarding the allotments to
Tract Map No, 4652, Abe Guny (DA -91 -1) (APN's
511 - 110 -35; 5 1- 020 -025; 511- 020 -035; 500 -260-
05; 500 - 270 - -( ) .
SECTION 2. The allotment. are awarded to Tract 4652 based
on the cri.tc is set forth by Measure F as
defined ti � t:t;> implementing resolution and as
more parti_�.,]�r;.y set. forth below:
That the awarding of alto ments is consistent with the
purposes, standards, and gtii e Ines of Measure F, Resolution
No. 87 -421 and Resolution 40. 88 -522 included within the
Residential Development Mare i�ric!nt. ;y:;tem.
z7L
That the award of allotments for the 1991 year is consistent
with the policies, goals and 3bjectives of the General Plan as
follows:
Land Use Element:
a. The awarding of allotments promotes planned, well ordered
and efficient urban development patterns - (Urban Form Goal 1,
page 13);
b. The awarding of allotment:n will properly direct population
and vigorous growth for Moorj:,ark (Population and Urban Growth
Goal 1, page 14);
C. The awarding of allotments will help protect the
environment by providing an adequate quality of life
(Population and Urban Growth Goal., page 15);
e. The awarding of allotments will provide an assurance to all
residents of Moorpark a save, health, stable and pleasant
living environment with economically and socially diversified
residential neighborhoods ;Rp-�sidential Goal 1, page 15);
f. The awarding of alloiments provides a reinforced,
controlled, orderly, and phased development while discouraging
( urban sprawl (Public Facili.t:es and .Services Goal 3, page 28) ;
g. The awarding of allotments helps to provide adequate
housing to meet the needs and desires of all residents
(Housing Goal 1, page 29);
h. The awarding of allotments promotes viable and safe
residential neighborhoods ' Housing Coal 6, page 29);
i. The awarding of allotments protects the public health,
safety and welfare of all s+ gments of the community (Social
Goal 1, page 30);
J. The awarding of allotments will provide a reasonable
balance between land uses ani transportation facilities.
Housing Element:
a. The awarding of allotments will ensure that an adequate
provision of decent, safe horsing for all Moorpark residents
without regard to race, agk1, sex, marital status, ethnic
background or other arbitrar , :()ndi t=.i.ons (Overall Goal, page
36).
I
SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption
of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTEL this day of
1991.
ATTEST:
Lillian E. Kellerman
City Clerk
Mayor, City of Moorpark, California
5
EXHIBIT 1
MOORPARK
799 Moorpark Avenue "Moorpark, California 93021
M E M O R A N D U M
c�
ITEM
(805) 529 -6864
TO: The Residential Development Evaluation Board
FROM: Patrick J. Richards, Durector of Community Development
DATE: July 29, 1991 . (RDEB Me(�ting of 8 -5 -91)
SUBJECT: RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMEm,MAHAGEMENT SYSTEM 1991 (DA -91 -1)
Background
On July 15, 1991, the Residential Development Evaluation Board
reviewed Application No. DA -91 1 filed by Abe Guny for 18
allotments to allow development. of Tract No. 4652. At that
meeting, the Board made a determin it.ion regarding recommended point
assignment for DA -91 -1 and directei staff to post the Board's point
assignment listing consistent wi.h Resolution No. 87 -421 (which
sets forth the procesFy and procei ures 1,:)r- the City's Residential
Development Management System)..
Resolution No. 87 -421 requires t %at the Residential Development
Evaluation Board shall hold a public hearing on development
allotments requests at least 15 da•vs following the required posting
of the Board's recommended point assignment and ranking. The
Board's recommended point assignm4,,jt [Cr ")A -91 -1 was posted on July
18, 1991 (see attached copy).
Discussion
The August 5 public hearing for DA -91 -1 has been scheduled to
comply with Resolution No. 87 -421. The purpose of the public
hearing is to receive testimony concerning the Board's tentative
point rating. The applicant may r:-equest the Board at the public
hearing to reevaluate the point a:si_gnment- The primary criteria
for the Board to alter its point assignment on a development is
demonstration by an applicant that there exists pertinent
information which the Board wa;
original evaluation. >t awa;c °e of at the time of the
Staff's report to the Re.,
dated July 9, 1991, for the
a detailed discussion
recommendations for point
additional comments.
PAUL W LA'NRA -SIN A BERNAADO M PEF,'E7
Q3 ,r ,( Liayc( P o Tr-i
3identi.a ; L)eve.l.opment Evaluation Board
Board 't July :5, 1991, meeting contains
of t;:e 1)I _91 -1 application and
ass i ran, r t St.af f does not have any
ROY E TAl LEY JR
JOHN E 1'dQIN'AK
w, ,;,, mLrr Ccunc!mer.,cr
The Residential Development EvalL,ation Board
July 29, 1991
Page 2
Staff does not expect that the applicant will be requesting any
further modification to the Board's tentative point assignment. As
discussed at the Board's July 15 meeting, a total of 810
allocations are available and only 18 have been requested. Also,
the Board's tentative point assignment for DA -91 -1 will allow the
application to be forwarded to th- City Council for consideration.
Recommendation
1. Approve the attached resolution recommending to the City
Council the Board's recommerled point rating for DA -91 -1.
Attachment:
RDEB's Tentative Point Assi<,,iment., for DA -91 -1
Draft Resolution
PJR /DST
w
1 A - b z n o :m nac.
<
M
M
r-
' i i n -o l.efic 7,;, 8 c t
<
M
-4
01
Cn
C
PART A
>
Nd
OL
r D
0
M
z
r-t
Project Number/Applicant Name
0
mn
<
J5
Cn
(<D
i3m
Mx
A-1 Water Supply Impact
z=
A-2 Wastewater Service Impact
A-3 Storm Water Dr8lnage
Points
I 7
x
OA-4
Fire Response Efficiency
1 A - b z n o :m nac.
<
M
M
r-
' i i n -o l.efic 7,;, 8 c t
<
M
-4
01
Cn
C
70
('D
>
Nd
OL
r D
0
M
z
r-t
z
0
mn
<
0
>
Cn
(<D
i3m
Mx
z=
1 A - b z n o :m nac.
<
M
M
r-
' i i n -o l.efic 7,;, 8 c t
0
-4
01
MK%
z
<
M
--4
r-
%-S
0
01
C
M
Nd
z
Points
I 7
x
CD
r-t
Available Points
CA
U1
Percentage
r-t
z
<
M
--4
r-
%-S
0
01
C
M
Nd
z
I -, erar., }. :n ^�.�• -- _- -nor._ .- , �-
+ u--� aryls ?BOA A6H
z
a.
rt
d
r'1 C'J
Cl) C7
C O
n,
i
w
C
i✓
L7
Cv
l
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION t•'• "). 87 - -_ -_121
A RESOLUTION OF THE MOORPARK C (Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA ADOPTING A RESIDENTIAL DEVE4..OPMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the City Council )t ie (lity of Moorpark has directed staff to
prepare an implementation resolution Aitr regard to the Residential Development
Management System adopted by the citizen f Moorpark by passage of Measure F on the
November 4, 1986 Municipal Election; and
WHEREAS, the Moorpark Plannin; --ommission has reviewed and considered
the Draft Residential Development Management System on July 10, 1987 and August 3,
1987; held duly noticed public hearings ric - :onsider the draft allotment system; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commis on recommended to the City Council
approval of the draft allotment system it hei, recommendation dated August 3, 1987;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the pr
Quality Act (Division 13 of the Public:
(beginning at Section 21000)1, an erry
accordance with the City's adopted Envi-o
been determined that the proposed ?
qualifies for a Negative Declaration, a,i�
the office of the Clerk of the Count.,
adopted Environmental Guidelines.
visions of the California Environmental
esources Code of the State of California
ronmental assessment has been made in
mental (; uidelines, and as a result it has
icentia Development Management System
a Negative Declaration has been filed in
F ket:.ara in accordance with the City's
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY C',I N L (,F T�'E CITY OF MOORPARK DOES RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council herc,by finds and determines that the
Residential Development Management System gill not, have a significant effect on the
environment and that the Negative Dec Ia,a o,7 war, filed with the Clerk of the County
of Ventura.
SECTION 2. Based upon , e staff report and the evidence and
testimony received at the public hearin(li the City Council hereby approves of the
proposed Residential Development Manacle -ent System as provided in Exhibit "A"
attached hereto, and incorporated heroji y Qfr— ence as though fully set forth at
this point-
SECTION 3. The City
resolution and shall cause this
in the office of the City Clerk.
A1OCAT /8 /CHRCNI
rk shall certify to the adoption of this
)l 1-jr-in and his certification to be filed
"a,cr C' nt. Harper, City of Moorpark, CA.
l'\
i
]0/09/
h.xli BIT "A"
RESIDENTIAL DEVE W MEMO
MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM
C
SECTION 1. PURPOSE The purpose o! his
Resolution
is to set
forth the process
and procedures for issuance of regiT t,b!
h0 lding
permits
under the City's
Residential Development Management Syn, m
Initiative
Ordinance
Measure F 1986,
Initiative Ordinance)).
SECTION 2. APPLICABILITY OF THE RESIDI
Residential dwelling units exempted Q
System which have an approved entitlemrsn,
at anytime as permitted by all relevn
Moorpark Municipal Code. The prov -i_st,
residential projects including mobile
exempt projects:
:NTIAL DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
m the Residential Development Management
may apply for building and grading permits
t Wet:ions, Articles, and Titles of the
s �)f t iris resolution shall apply to all
Mme 4i'l the exception of the following
A. Projects of not wrn then J"ur dwelling, units exempt from the
requirement of ap;I atiou or a Planned Development Permit,
limited to only oin ch p -o •ct per applicant per calendar year;
b. Fourplexes or lo,
single existing l ,;
nomhn,ed multiple dwelling units on a
C. Single family dwe1Ii- ivit "i a single existing lot;
d. Rehabilitation or rep do iog )f an existing dwelling unit or
conversion of mpi; montF o condominiums, so long as no
additional dwelliu, i ,r- created;
e. Dwelling units of
Income based upon
County per Govern
years or older)
provisions of a
program,;
low in nme (65% and below of Median
it At rdability income limits for Ventura
c:0 !-(tion 50079.5)or senior citizen (62
t. ti Wd or subsidized pursuant to the
.r l IT PA-ral, state or local laws or
f. Projects of dwel111j Sri s with a minimum lot size of five net
ncrc; per dwel l ii y,
SECTION 3. ESTABLISHMENT OF RESIDENTIA,, UEVFLOf_MENT EVALUATION BOARD In order
to administer
the system set
forth in
-s resolution a Residential Development
C Evaluation Board
(hereinafter
called tl•f,
Board)
is established, consisting of the
duly appointed
members of the
Planning
of the City. The procedures and
by -laws of the
Board shall be
deveiopr(i
pub
IC !tearing by the Board subject to
the approval of
the City Council. The
,mioity
) evelopment Department of the City
shall serve as
the staff of the
Board.
SECTION 4. ESTABLISHMENT OF ANNUAL RtSIDENTIAL_BUILDING DEVELOPMENT ALLOTMENTS
The number of residential development i o ?meat.:, that are allocated each calendar
year in the City for non- exempt dweIIirt ;, ini:s ;hall be as provided by all of the
provisions of Initiative Ordinance o it suc- cr�! +sor ordinance. The City Council
shall establish by rr:soluti_on the aVtIi r, Llity Development Allotments annually
prior to review of the Hoards recomilf, t <n a A based on the provisions of the
Initiative Ordinance
SECTION 5. ALLOTMENT REQUIRED FOR Ht
building permit for non- - exempted prf j
Allotment for such project- has been
an allotment awarded within an approve
Development Allotment ent.�tlement nio,
utilities or other infrastructure impT,
by the City F,ngineer and Director
purpose and intent of Measure F and .i G
a manner so as to eliminate damage du,
of such grading as deemed appropriate
,Dt?�G OI, GRADING PERMITS No residential
t; may he issued unless a Development
tcd. t, grading permit may be- issued after
tin ied I'icvelopment '!.one and outside of the
f slaci is required to extend streets,
mFrtf long as such grading is approved
omniir: :i° y Development consistent with the
u I I— Is treated with landscaping in such
1,i''n and to reduce the visual impacts
h t) r ( t r r of Commun ity Deve lopment .
SECTION 6. DEVELOPMENT ALLOTMENT 11'E' C11 "l lt`N
A. Fi ling, After apl r ,a I f i Planned Development and Tentative
Tract. Map entitlomei I I (<;idential project under Article 19
of Chapter 1 of I, � 1n i),,T � toning Ordinance, or any successor
-)rdinarnce,nil appli.,3 t!1.. for a Development Allotment.
Adopted by Peso. gi -'2:
C
B. Application An app`s
he made on the )I
Development Depa r t rice
approval date of b"
Permit. In order
for filing and prw o
time remaining
Development entitI,m,
signed by the owre
power of attorney
"13
ation for a Development Allotment shall
scribed form provided by the Community
t. The application shall include the
entativ" Tract flap and Planned Development
an appication to be accepted by the City
i"n, tt ere must be at least six months of
t,it Tentative Tract Map and Planned
it eppr"vals. All applications shall be
the i roperty or person with appropriate
C. Filing_ Fee Eacrr n n1 inat.On sha11 be accompanied by the fee
specified per City ins. 1 r; solution before it is accepted for
filing and proces�
D. Filing_ -Pe riod 1 il pl it itions shal l he filed during the
designated filing & d ,nly. The designated filing period
shall he the caler d r ica h of Tune.
E. Number o f Res ident i 1 Flu i A i n
An app 1 icant may r, t on, i ve
of allotments avn i _a e unit
requested is less 1. tre
Komonstrated to C t',
Improvement benefit Wit A
Permit Allotments Granted
more than 60% of the total number
s the total member of allotments
mual allotment or the project has
COUE& I cr_tstanding cvmmun it:y
L a percontige increase.
1ev.101 28I
SECTION 7. DEVELOPMENT ALLOTMENT PROCI:S ING
A. Tentative Point Ratin };
Tract ma 1) and a I
Commission shall a-,r
evaluation system —1
the entitlement apprry
terms of absolute ii,x
number of points awt-
The maximum number f
elements of the ( r I
Community Developmen+
agencies.
B. Board Recommendation
!es p;jrt . of the approval of a Tentative
1110 Id )evelopment Permit,the Planning
tentr�iive point ratings based on the
t Section 9 in conjunction with
Elie. ratings will be expressed both in
,,a ; 3no is a percentage of the maximum
al le f,,r each subsection of Section 9.
x i its awardable shall not include those
a found to he not applicable. The
elnrtmeCt will coordinate review by other
1 Public Hearing
i'he Board shall hold a public hearing
not later that
to nontt of August for applications filed
the previonr;
" to valuate the Planning Commission's
tentative poiFil
W ts>, f the projects. At least fifteen
(�5) days p-i
t7 he public hearing, the, Board shall
r,�vi_ew each 11
4 c 3t icr to determine that each is in
accordance w:
its A and B Section 9 (Evaluation
Syst(,.m) in
A ,ch of these criteria; and having
assigned evraI�
c points on a scale of zero to ten in
accordance k,i
tc ii inding, documenting points awarded
f rom part
:c! r B of Sect ion 9, arranging the
development!, i
•A-I i t in order from that receiving the
greatest tr 1
t:ml�-I of evaluation points to that
receiving the
number and shall publish the lists by
posting su( 1,
lir ;1 t hall Public Hearing Notice
Board. 111 '1411
L 1 t ist:ing the number of actual points
awarded in
sail,,: tt" , < >ry of both parts, each part wi l 1
I e totaled
t,� to al shall then be expressed as a
percentaF;e
0 rnti> in im lumber of points awardable. The
maximum numh,
f awardable shall not include those
e lcnnnt of I �
: , f()und to be not appl icable.
Adopted t,v Rcso.R7 -��.'1 i
/5
Having evaluated
a, h ievelopment in accordance with t
foregoing criter
1, the Board shall have posted the
results of their
'view oa the public hearing notice board
of (;ity lial 1 I a •
f� < c,( re my of the Board. At least ten
(10) days prtu
g tho tioari_ng, notice of the hearing
sha Il be ��1
facement of a quarter page
advertisement ii
(W"jli newspaper of general circulation
within the City
4 -it t �a notice to the applicant(s) .
2. Public Testimony
Du ~ink; the course of the public
hearing, the
viral l receive testimony concerning the
Planning Comm i:°
)i'.. entative point rating of the
projects in
ra t ions I; p to the evaluation system
contained in
,(n Any applicant may request the
hoard, at srni <i
1) hearing, to re- evaluate the point
assignment m,id,
n ally or all of the criterion. The
primary critoT
r tho Board to alter its point
assignment on ,;
it development is demonstration by
the npplicntio>r
a' exists pertinent information or
prc, j ect rede!z i y[
} i :h t ` e Board was not aware of at the
time of the O 1 ,
3 t-1.'�i. iit ion.
3. Recommended Po n
1,at,np; and Rankin - After closing the
pub 1 i_c tes t i n
i,, it r)i o t the hen r ing, the Board shall
consider the P ,,
;i,i, i ;onmission's tentative point rating,
tho public t�
Iv All the evaluation system contained
in Section 9 t
t a ,l isl he recommended point rating and
ranking by su -
i u1 f ;(—tion () for each application.
( i ) The Bona
�a l (,s ah l ish the Recommended Point
Rating t,
)1 � 1 ,n), the points that. each application
ha:; be'.11
I I +I
L
C. City Council Permit Al.lotmEr
1. Public Hearing
Tjj, C 'y Council shall
by
hearing upon roc
pt cif' he recommendation
(ii) The Board sti'+
1 lank: in order these applications
rt �E'.d, not later than
the month of
dividing °-he
le ,ommen< led Point Rating by the total
�—
hearing shall
available «
lit ac indicated in the evaluation
Section 7(b)(1
system to 11
iuc,� a >ercentage score. The highest
1)rrnrrs! 'the course of the
public hearing
percentag(�
r ng a11,,,lication shall be ranked first
and shall
consider tare
with suhs
e t �aF cr.easing percentage scoring
application 1-
rce 1 fl m the Board and
applicati+)r,;
anke<i i descending order.
f si)"ltment rf point.
ratings rm'i
4. Board Recommendat;
n _o tile City Council - The Board
shall forward it-
econmended point rating and the ranking
of each appli<;ati
r to t'e City Council not later than
September 31st
ie 1loard will not cause any application
to be forwarded
Council which does not receive
at least fort"-
n" leer cent (49 %) of the available
absolute
9.A. (Availability of Public
Ffic i 1.Ities an(
and at least seventy percent
(7Ct%) of th(-
a at] absolute points in Section
9.B (Quality ref i
Contribution of Public Welfare
and Amenity), e ><
t )y wr itten request from the applicant
Within three (
ly the Boards decision_
L
C. City Council Permit Al.lotmEr
1. Public Hearing
Tjj, C 'y Council shall
hold a public
hearing upon roc
pt cif' he recommendation
of the Board.
The hearing ;}��
rt �E'.d, not later than
the month of
October for rp,7
i led in .tune.
Notice of the
hearing shall
ven the same manner
as provided in
Section 7(b)(1
2. Public Testimoi;y
1)rrnrrs! 'the course of the
public hearing
the Counci
publ is testimony
and shall
consider tare
mrr,enc. =��� Point rating and
ranking of each
application 1-
rce 1 fl m the Board and
may re- evaluate
any npplicat,
f si)"ltment rf point.
ratings rm'i
ranking.
I-,-
3. Allotment Awards
point rating and
Council. shall of
which has not
percentage (49°x,)
minimum of sev,.i
9.B. The Coin i(
Allotment from
M The aware
shall be
by the
resident. r;
sha 1 1 of t
propert
'rhe C )uncil shall establish a single
ranking of all applications. The City
irate f °om consideration any development
,,c,n iti;, igned a minimum of forty -nine
ender Section 9.A. herein, or a
r 1olC( stage (70 °0) points under Section
1�a then award the Development
f it ne,,elopment Allotment for a project
c„rded 4-ith the Ventura County Recorder
p I icant: prior to the issuance of a
Iuil(li g permit. Development Allotments
I , 1 r + n�: f er_ red to another project or
/i
(ii) If a 1, + c- yes not receive a Development
AIlotm(�n, I, app: cant may re -apply during the next
avaiInb1, i ink: } F ri<)d.
4.
Allotments
�j given year the highest ranking
application 1
s r,ot t least meet both of the minimum
point requii-(,if
t. o! ection i(C)(3), the City Council
shall make i.-
n it -i' otment for that year. ThQ number
of units d ;1
ttien he added to the next annual
allocation_ 1
he 1•✓ allowed exception to the ten
percent ( 10`4 ) ,
:i ion 12
SECTION 8. LIFE OF
RESIDENTIAL BU1;i
ING PEI"tI'I ALLOTMENT Should a developer
fail to commence actual
construction I,V
d i,.emeii;. of an approved foundation within
twenty -four (24) months
after award
h� R�s,4�l��r��tial Building Permit Allotment -,
the City Council, after
a public hears
n;>:.i <<+ pursuant to Government Code 65090,
may by majority vote rescind all or e
1' (,rmit AlIctm(�nt and may re- assign
the permit allotment to
tnotll('r pry
'( 1�ived an allocation in the same
period.
A(Iopt'd
li
SECTION 9. EVALUATION SYSTEM The 11 ow rig, po int evaluat ion system shn 11'—be�-
�` used to evaluate all applications for a rio. I q mont iii lotment.
A. Availability of Public Fac.i t.cs an,i Services Sixty total
points are awardable, wit -i tont iai for additional ten points or
more under (Section 9,A % , li-i o nw )] ,cable.
1. Water Service Effici(�n ind Impact
Points shall be aw,ir oci in iccordance with Part' (i) below.
Points shall also h� iwar(Iei in accordance with Part (ii)
below. No appl icat i )r 0 -1 1 1 � .,;re more than a combined total of
ten (10) points..
( i ) Water Supply i irni t
11 ints Standai(I
A(iopted by Ros).?7 - 1
10 The en - i r p o jocl �,an meet domestic and fire flows
without rt for transmission pipeline, pumping
station, ora,(, tank improvements which involve
no net it l —)r, r ibut ions by the water purveyor.
8 The pr( j t (_Onn:!;ts of lass than twenty (20)
dwe I I i II v> i i in lit existing pressure zone that has
insuf f i, _ ;t,)i , available, but has sufficient
fire , iI,: to- lr cporating storage.
6 7 '11 e prc E of less than one hundred ( 100)
but a1 a t t t. ,nty (2.0) dwel l ing units in nn
exist , 1,, c, :: ur 4, u,ne that has insufficient storage
avnilrlr, } ut It sufficient fire and day -to -day
opernt i t .r a �
4 The pro le <t
ccnsir,t:
of one hundred (100)
dwellin_- ---- -_
units or iic
i i sir,
oxist.ing pressure zone
that has
insufficieii
s c,r,ig
but provides additional
storage
or pumpi�j
which will not involve
capital
contrihu-
water purveyor.
2 The entir «;
rcpct
annot be served hydraulically
by
an exist it P
r ,! , ;r„
: -:one system.
0 All other i J
(it) Community lmprc>ti.
Points Standar.r
S The pro o 11 pi wide needed system improvements,
as detcorr i ,d >r; if, City, beyond those needed to
satisfy ! "I ( ,ne':t c rind fire flow requirements of
the prc, j I'c is 1 ify, Lire improvements must be
judged urveyor as being of substantial
benefit ?c (ject boundaries and must not
require i c 1 ri n,.ial participation by the water
Purvey(
2. Wastewater Service _ni t
Points shall be '3w r
Points shall also
below. No applicati
ten ( 10 ) points.
C accordance with part (i) below.
d_ta 11 do, i it accordance with part ( ii)
1 a l 1 -.,, oro more than a combined total of
Community Improvemwit
Points Standar,,
Ado1)1 o(1 by R ,so. Fii I
5 The prc, i.
waSt("Wal4'
City, I),
sat isI�'
To qu,i I
wasteW,�� ,
outside
direct
put vetir�
v 1I rovide one or more needed
y stc'm improvements, as determined by the
�c' those required to existing ordinance to
ic,mo- t.ir:: requirements of the project.
th" mprovements must he judged by the
I n r as being of substantial benefit
c j 'c+ hI>rurdari and must not require
I- nnrtici tion by the was tewnt(,. r
ao
(i) Wastewater
Capacity_ 'm
act
Points
Standard
10
Wastewat
se"vI(:'
can be
provided to the
project
without_ ?)
ini os
-x i.sting
system improvements which
invoIv «,
ip to ".
.ontributions by the waterworks
purveyor
8
Treatmerr�.
plant-
opacity
exists but the
project
requires
-yito <.ewer
line
improvements.
6
Treatment
plant
:opacity
exists but the
project
requii
f �ile
ewer line
improvements.
4
Treatment
pant
apacity
does exist, but
project
proposn�,
e w.i
;t. owater
lift station units.
Any c,"mh
Ia; port
)f two
or more of the
impacts
��-
identi if
i L `_?u
;r iteri.a
above.
0
All othf r
'r r t- t
;
Community Improvemwit
Points Standar,,
Ado1)1 o(1 by R ,so. Fii I
5 The prc, i.
waSt("Wal4'
City, I),
sat isI�'
To qu,i I
wasteW,�� ,
outside
direct
put vetir�
v 1I rovide one or more needed
y stc'm improvements, as determined by the
�c' those required to existing ordinance to
ic,mo- t.ir:: requirements of the project.
th" mprovements must he judged by the
I n r as being of substantial benefit
c j 'c+ hI>rurdari and must not require
I- nnrtici tion by the was tewnt(,. r
3. Storm Water Drainage T r iac t.
tNo application shall ore mare than a combined total of ten
(10) points.
Points Standard
(i)Storm Water Drainage f ac K it.i es
10 Storm writ
sub- surfac
boundaries
runoff it
boundaries
by the C ,
drainage ,t
'r
stc
acrd
0
+n i
n
can be handled without further
rm Train improvements outside project
doe=s not result in increased peak
yeah frequency storm outside project
i -ti plve no net capital contributions
F"'K" Control District or storm water
7 Storm w-, IT it be handled without further
subsurfi(- tor, c ain improvements outside project
boundari,
3 Storm W�A r (,'I TI be handled, but will require
off -site A so- fico storm drain improvements.
0 All other c!�cts
0 i)Community Improvement�-
Points Standard
5 Project 4 l provide needed flood control system
improvpm,,r a)c, c and beyond normal City
requirnpm, n whM would benefit a larger area than
just thn i j � t , 1K
ddovi ed by Reso. fi; .4, 1 -
�i
4. Fire Protection
Points shall be awiii-, ,d in accordance with Part (i) below.
Points shall also de lu,,tt d from the Part M score in
accordance with Pai W. No application shall score
more than a combined 3 �n ( 10 ) points.
(i) Fire Protecti�)t
Points Standard
A(lopted by
1.0 Project pi)v,ues i new fire station or provides
major oq,i, mfrt c major equipment housing at no
financia rr'. (-- ;p +tion by the Fire District.
10 Fifty )or n- or more of proposed dwelling
units >u itlain awe 11) mile driving distance of an
existing, ( :) it tnally committed fire station.
7 Fifty r 'n (')(� ) or more of proposed dwelling
units it i'iir; wo (2) miles driving distance of
an exi° t i r , )Ill r "Ictually committed fire station.
3 Fifty or more of proposed dwelling
units (3) mills driving, distance of
an ox i., s r I. ractually committed fire station.
0 All othf, rc jec t -
OM
(it) Fire Station and quipmerv._AdegIIacy
Two (2) points tal he deducted from the projects Part
(i.) score if 11 11 r- Oistrict has determined that the
project will 1iit 4- °'>e construction of a new fire
station, or 1 aid.iI- on of major equipment housing
facilities to 11 1yxisti11 g fire station which causes
financial part )a,, oti °,v the Fire District.
5. School Impact
Points shall be awaaleci in accordance with Part (i) below.
Points shaII also h - IWdrdni in accordance with Part (ii)
below. No appl icnt i ), s1,a I' l� ! ore more than a combined total of
ten (10) points. S inp,tct shall be measured from operating,
under construction ite )ntdod or closed existing facilities
for purposes of det t' [I,, ;(ring.
Availability w .I.oA Capacity
Points Standard
10 The pro e L consists of one hundred (100 %) senior
citizoti ig t ; defined in Civil Code Section
51.i
8 The aVl— ria e ;pool has the capacity to absorb
the chi Ir n (-xi- l-ed to inhabit the project without
necess r. i Ti,-, of Ading to double sessions or other
unusu;t ltn ;,, or classroom overcrowding at the
elemen iIi,�' mediate and high school, as
detormir 1)., +11, tc,orpark Unified School District.
l
1(
4:��7 Z/
6 The app ropr.
are school has the capacity to absorb
the child-e
vxpent"d to inhabit the project without
necess it w i
0 c7r a(Fling to double sessions or other
unusual. } -I,r
I inr; )r classroom overcrowding at any
two of
tiree levels, as determined by the
Moorpark
- : - l n0 ool. District -.
4 The apprcp
an" School has the capacity to absorb
the chid
=n cxptcted to inhabit the project
without re
�s; tating or adding to double sessions
or oth« L r
r'nusn t scheduling or classroom
overcrowd m ;
it any one level, as determined by the
Moorparl 1,
r" ed T iool District.
1 The estinn
A scW,0 impact of the project can be
accornmod,
>r11 if mitigation measures are
required
Or provided without financial
particip
n icy t! e School District at one or more
levels,
P� rAi -ed by the Moorpark Unified School
Distri(
0 A11 other
o cc's
(ii_) Community_Impi m, �n
Points Standaii
5 to 10 The proji -
improvomf r;
School i)
City MP!
q"nlify,
School i
beyond rlr
not I 1, i
School 11
Adept ed by Rpso. S7 -42
wi 1 provide needed
school district
i4 (i ,termirred by
the Moorpark Unified
r < t I —V nrd those
needed to satisfy
the
r t e Y , Inirement;;
for the project.
To
P imp ),oments must:
be judged by
the
ri.t being of
substantial benefit
f r n'✓ i led through
required fees and
must
'i1 , iinancirI
participation by
tho
s
6. Street Traffic Impact
The maximum number of
eight (8), and i ait
application shall t,
(10) points.
0?5
oints Ivnrdnble Part (i) shall be
(i ) naximuin shall be five (5). No
wr�,ried Wore than a combined total of ten
(i) Major Street Iii, rsect i.)!t Imp_act
Point
8
7
5
3
0
Points shal'. i
service at t do
the boundaries,
Works shall
l'Ivel of sery
peak -hour cum
determine th-
:Msed on projected peak -hour level of
wog ma1.r street intersections closest to
' t horr ro ject. The Department of Public
�( t t t two intersections. The lowest
et t ii c, t"o intersections for a.m. or p.m.
_ve t�atfic volumes shall be used to
b i f )( ) nts awarded.
,ice
C{
(ii) Community lmprovE' neat
Points Standen
a6
5 Project 0 %,ides for the construction of a
connect inn street link in the system of streets
listed n thE, Moorpark General Plan Circulation
Element.
2 Project provides for the construction of a portion
of the ler{th of m connecting link; or the project
provides he widening of an off -site, existing
street 1 ;t"(i r the Moorpark General Plan
Circul<it r F I-, III E,r,; .
0 All othe, , c j pct
7. Tentative Tract Map
Points Standard
10 points Tentati%,4 rac;. mal for the project was approved by
per yr. the City 1 scr to ',ovember 4, 1986 but after 1984.
B. Quality of Design_ and C()r, ribition of Public Welfare and Amenit
One hundred and twenty ( i ( t :7 i joints are awardable.
1. Design Qualit_y__Bui i, in�,,s No gc)re than ten (10) points shall be
awarded pursuant t, l (rit —� a below.
The exterior app(,; r .11 „ c R f e project should relate with the
existing charncter hi -no o the area, enluance the surrounding
vicinity, be com1),iI- wr' .i all adjacent land uses, and
maintain a high , :1-1(? andard of dc,velOpmeut. Standard,;
he Con';idered x.
A,1(-w rid
.)
7
Exterior materials 'he bu.iiding materials of a project are
f durable, have low mni tenance, are the same or higher than the
quality of surrounding lovelopments, and do not adversely impact
adjacent land uses
Relief - To avoid mcn 'onous elevations, architectural relief is
used in the design atovide interest and variety. Details
that create shade no, ca > ;t shadows are used to provide visual
relief to the build i :y
Detailing - Detailing; is uses: as at method of illustrating the
theme or character. t bui ding and to add interest to the
project..
}leight - The scale t!i -t project shall be proportional to any
adjacent buildings
Mechanical equipment
view with material
as the project.
[a een ink, - All equipment is screened from
i eg rated with the same architectural design
Window and door p1m meat - Visibility into adjacent areas is
minimized by the witNa and d-nir locations.
:op . . , Ro o, fi, - . 1
i
t
a
Comp ItibiI i.tv -- "the project is designed to
on!in .cv, harmonize, and be appropriate with
t h- - recent land uses.
Points Standard
600 The prof "c nrchit- ac.ture represents excellent
design rr erms of all the above standards
1_5 The proje. meets 1 majority of the above
standards
0 Al l otiie r )r 7 e( r.
2. Open_Space_ and Landsc: ;Qn,
No more than ten C w ints shall be awarded pursuant to the
criterii below_
"Ile project should r. )rparnte plant materials that help absorb
sound, act as a f, er to the air, curtail erosion, provide
shade, and mnintn n i Standards to be considered are as
toi lows :
Landscape buffer_ t— W aped areas are provided to minimize the
impacts of the fir e,t ant maintain n gradual transition
internally betweeli 1 �! and externally with the adjacent land
uses and secure a r art ki- elationship among the uses.
Amount of landscnp r - 1 _i, quantity, size and type of plant
materials corresp)iI sith t o- land uses proposed, taking into
account the i nten s > hC j f,• rn t land uses.
Adopted by Reso.87- ) l
i
Foundation planting
from the public
landscaping is used
elevations, connect
privacy.
4here building foundations are visible
a e(4, )I from adjacent uses, foundation
T'i s kindscaping compliments the building
� 1- ' u i ld i ng to the site, and increases
Drainage - Storm writ:.
retention
areas do not detract from the
quality of the
ai,e
pies ign.
Within retention areas, the
plant material is
,p,itih1-
with
the use. Large areas for
retention are des ig'TP
ti
cli_�rinate
small unusable areas.
Maintenance - T`W iands(.a�,e design facilitates continuous
maintenance, and ill C,�� plants are used.
Shade - Consider r,, tie :ity's arid, sunny environment, the
landscape design !;bade for structures, outside
recreational area,,, ir- i K .areas.
low water usage q water usage is achieved by the use of
plant materials thit i, u, )t have a high water usage. Drought
resistant shrubs ;i t- ire the predominant accent plants
used in the lands( <i!
Points Stand�ai
6 -10 the prc) excellent landscaping in terms
of all tandards
1 -5 The p q majority of the above standards.
0 Al of leer i � r,
Site
Setbacks
- The hn i
Ky s n:-e
" -50
adjacent
3. Design Quality Sit4�
rid ''arking
-
project
and to pro -t .°
tic wse n
of the project.
No more than ten 1)
points
shall be awarded pursuant to the
criteria below. The
1,ry
u't is very important in creating
the character of
l r rjoc!
. T'he physical, social, and
psychological needs
he
risers of the project should be
considered within "1,
i(sign
The impacts of the proposed
design on the ani n
nt 4id
uses should also be a major
priority. Standa- ;
r !t"
design to be considered are as
f o 1 l ows 7
Site
Setbacks
- The hn i
Ky s n:-e
setback from the street and
adjacent
property fr�
F�nou�;h to
enhance the appearance of the
project
and to pro -t .°
tic wse n
of the project.
Signage - The placomp t and Ksign of the signage is compatible
with the project nic Li ad l i :vnt land uses.
Security - Ile V! +V t. reates a secure physical and
psychological envi r, q Qrt I;ot i for the site and its occupants.
Buildings are desigic to ll"w surveillance of parking areas to
detect opportunit i G,. in nh l in ion.
Walls - Physical s"I reticri is used to minimize the impact of
unattractive, noisy Obs Qf the project and to act as a buffer
between the project Oinc+ nt Land uses.
'trash and refuse (, 1 -(t ion rreas - Arens which generate noise
or odors are local , c alert ! ray will not disturb adjacent land
rises or the occr!iu-i of t project and are not the visual
focal point of a +rig , dpv < ; nrk ing area.
Outside storage - )it r v storage areas are screened fcorn
pnhlic view and fr"- i a (it bind uses.
Adopt od by Kso. c87- :' 1 '�
l
COpen space - Opev ;pace used t.o reduce the perceived
c row (I edness, density an] t Li,htness of the project and as a
buffer t.o and from 1 3cor;t I rid uses.
Noise impact - Nois( lir.Ierj rom the project will not
interfere with any ,,d 3coitt:. I,aad uses. The occupants of the
project are prote .t o t r )m ii rise outside and within the site,
through screening, ,r, °�a :l s, Icid building materials.
Pedestrian circulati{n A, rietwork ofd convenient and safe
pedestrian paths is 1, ovided to connect areas within the project
and the project with ij,ac.ent. I,�ind uses.
Compat il> i 1 i t y with ,,r
to minimize negati,. e
t i t ion bet.weer, .
achieved through r ;(
and window and door i,
;ceut u<es - The project is designed so as
irii act ()n surrounding uses. A gradual
c pro ect and adjacent land uses is
cks, b,;ilding height, walls, landscaping,
3cirer 1
Topography
- The natu
rl °-e,A ires of the land,
such as
hillsides,
viewshed;
a11d f)tl er features are
utilized in the
design �)f
the site
the project and
can avoid problems
associated
with i
iphli-!s steep slopes,
drainageways and
other n- It -ural
feat i,
Project entry - T1 o the project is easily identified
by walls, planter. s i�,n�ag�, made of materials compatible with
the project.
Building entry easily identifiable and act as a
transition 1) (It e t.� rle and inside areas. Building
cantric's are also .�id i'h adequate security, but the
1 iphl in;; sloes not land IS( s.
Lt ility locations - I I I " " 11 he installed underground.
CPrivacy - Site deslgt
Cprovide privacy fot
adjacent land uses
34�
ani UY)r plan layout is organized to
he occipants of the project and the
Fire access - The pr ,w meetn on -site fire hydrant and on -site
emergency access stand rdq regointed by the fire department.
Building separation - 11e heiF,ht of the buildings dictates the
distance between the gilding,, to insure privacy and perceived
openness for the one a oits of the project and the adjacent land
uses.
Lighting - Lighting .ocateA to provide security and visual
interest, but the tith in, dncs not impact adjacent land uses.
Parking
The major concern when
fitting all the t o,p
providing ample nta
pedestrian circul3ti
radius, having a;
maintaining a pleasan
locations, and Intones
development. Standny
are, as follows:
designing a parking lot is not limited to
red parking on -site, but also includes
nd lisle widths, having a useful
;yntcm, providing adequate turning
of_i(ionr traffic movement pattern,
apponrince, designing convenient parking
mg the parking with the character of the
I Pa °king area design to be considered
Maneuvering areas All Piineuvering requirements can be
accomplished entir"I> a !ite The maneuvering area design is
not complex, and in ; 'o ld,nt ify and navigate.
Driveway locations tri✓ewaNs provide a circulation pattern
which i_s conven ,, i Ind afc. Pedestrian traffic is
incorporated into the -c j ,ct ign.
Screening walls along r ght -of -way - All parking areas are
screened from public v:ipw wit, i wall, berm, or a combination of
the two.
Proximity to structures - The parking area is conveniently
located to provide ease < pi:ens 'o all users.
Amount /number of spaces The project has a sufficient number of
on -site parking spaces r accommodate all of its needs.
Covered spaces - Coveroo pnrKing is compatible with the overall
character of the projrc.
Parking lot lightin - Lighting will provide adequate
illumination to provi<`c environment but it will not
emit light beyond the Fr et
Auto headlight intrus inn - Ile pirki.ng area is designed so that
illumination from nut( Qr dl i ghl s will not disturb or disrupt
the occupants of the pit (, ), iliacent land uses.
Points Standard
6 -10 The projecr :itc p an represents excellent
design in rrrs <f all the above site and parking
standard.
Adnyt ed ly Roso. f+7 -01
1 -5 Project mo- , mnQ Ky of the above standards.
0 All other .r jm t!,
l
4. Provision of Useable )pen Slsa +,e
No more than ten lo�int; shalt be awarded pursuant to the
criteria below.
Points Standir i
6 -10 The p j
t f rovides usable public
or private
open
space.
hin ,r ;3s contributions
to areas
outside
Of the
o ('ct, substantially in
excess of
adopted
standai1,
)(Iic, s, and regulations.
Substantially
is dei n
for 'urposes of this
section as
twenty
five
cr greater.
1 -5 The PT E pI-c��i� es usable public and private open
space npli�nce with +311 adopted standards,
regulyd and ioiicies.
All nth, , 1
5. Deleter sous Impact � 1!
No more than five' into ,hall be awarded pursuant to the
criteria below.
The removal of dear r c�ise,i;ed trees or trees determined not
npproprlate for rot' i, cal I'-; v -. ified by the City, shall not be
counted among thc,
Points Standee!
Adopted 1)%' P(ISO.87 -421
5 Grad ill t; t I nk;, as shown on the approved
gradir�; wi 1 rnEiact f ivr percent (51) or fewer
of thr. i irn off-site trees having n diameter
of foil, )r more.
V
as
3 Grading t r"n(h i ng, as shown on the approved
grading an, ml ants more than five percent (5 %)
but leas t'ir,t I ,onty five percent (25 %) of the
on -site d Est kte trees with a diameter of four
inches ,r V er.
0 All other r > e, t ;
6. Provision of Water_('or servatioq Features
Points may be acct ":l(, nr IM—t. ing any of the standards listed
below to a maximum (f eel KC) paints.
Points Standnrc
5 Automat l;r,nkh r controls equipped with automatic
rain sh u )"f ontrol are used throughout the
irrignt s;; ,m
> Drought r, J a ant )ow water use plant materials are
used ox! o—,i c J� I the landscaping.
5 Other icant water conNervntion features, as
recogn iv- I v t Ii. Izoard or the City Council, are
incor_pot i d u," le project.
7. Provision of Energy : s"rvat' >ri Features
Points may be nccv c M morting any of the standards listed
helow to a maximum , I t 'O points.
l
t
M
Poi nts
Standard
36
3 Energy ri .i latioi,s and energy budgets for dwelling
units r-,.,, Fe m,uimum energy requirements for each
dwelliri; nit ri, hoer than an overall average as
permit t � ;;,,f. <<,tr 2- 5351(e) Title 24, Part 2 of
Ca if') I i 1It I I .-I at iv(, Code.
2 Dwellir; n.ts tIT�- sited to maximize effectiveness
of pa; °.i s >I.ir teatures considering sun angles,
wind (i i tO)ri, natural ventilation, and shading
devices ,,, i I s < =iar access pl<rn has been prepared.
2 A sol,3r , er 111'Oi.I irrg system, that is capable of
cons(,!% r f fifty percent (50`,y) or more of the
unass i �, « E x�e,,+ d Annual Water Ifeating Energy, is
instal 11 c- r ; dwelling unit.
2 A of f E,, tc 1 ) r space heating system that is
capab 1 ., i ng forty percent 40% or more of
lrnass i t �•d Annua t Space Ifeating Energy is
instal i C dwelling unit.
2 Heat i,u,, } a,,. r AI fed in al l dwelling units.
2 F.very 1" n i'_ is pre - plumbed for solar water
heatiT t �,i
2 South,�r >n windows in every dwelling unit
are 1, �r, i ', heavy projections, louvers
shuttot_ similar shading devices in a
manse= t it winter heating and summer
shad i r,sr
C
i
37.
2 Fxteri0T 1 01ts hill utilize high intensity, low
voltagc t 1.harg' � amps.
2 Exterior ghting fixtures will be activated by
either , photoelectric cell or automatic
clocks
Other ;,grnized significant energy conserving
features qs nppzoved by the Board or the City
Counci i;rcorporated into the project.
3. Bicycle and Foot Patti., Equestrian Trails Facilities and
Greenbelt
No more than ten '!1 i)inl:s shall be awarded pursuant to the
criteria hPIOw.
Points StandaI(i
6-10 The pru
with th"
Plan of I
off -si, �A
and f a c. 1
such bi
greenb,. I
lrovid�s all greenbelts consistent
n"rai an and /or any applicable Specific
�rina�d C� mmunity Plan on -site Class 1 and
1 . n,i foot paths, equestrian trails
ni l provides critical linkages for
e f,)o,' paths and equestrian trails and
The pro j ". l rov id< s all greenbelts consistent
with the li -in i Pl.nn and /or any applicable Specific
Plan I T1 Wd l ; minunity Plan on -site and off -site
Class ..c I(' '"d foot paths, equestrian trails
and f 1, i t < s ld grecnbe 1 is requ i red by the
Genc�rn n n,/ �zny applic:ahle Specific Plan or
Plain", it . I ill.
l h1I ot1 • I"
i
9. Site and Architecturai Vesign IZuality ropog aphic
Consideration
39�'-
No more than ten (10) oints !,i'ralI be awarded pursuant to the
criteria below.
Standaro
5 Project i(>
minimum in
of the hil
forms. }`r
landmarks
the sit
and lit, i
technigirf ;
colors
bui Idin;,s
and C r ].
of the
percent 1F;-
remains i
off - sit >
3 Project i,
invo l vf-
minor fie r
not iml -)
natura
0 All othc„
ign has, kept grading to an absolute
order t,, maintain the natural character
;i,ices and to complement the natural land
ec:t has retained all significant natural
id )then. natural outstanding features on
ha project has utilized varying setbacks
for buildings, varying building
n i un; :, u,� building forms, materials and
whI:..r ensure the compatibility of
ti the surrounding terrain. The street
i �r le:: ign respects the natural contours
msn niz.es grading and minimizes the
f LdWI devoted to streets. The project
rely glow any ridgeline visible from
pr(� sect site.
fn ha, kept grading to a minimum but
and f 11 slopes which will modify to a
-he i::ting terrain. The project will
s �,nif not natural landmarks and other
� c s or the site.
f (.
(b.) 10. Deleterious Impact on s "archaeological Sites
No more than five-
(5) points sha 1 e iwiii led pursuant to the criteria below.
Points Standard
5 The prod(- t; will have no impact from grading,
trenchin,y_ r .onstruction upon any known
archeo l off; rtl resot r,-es.
3 The prop, t will have an impact from grading,
trench i n v, )r oiistruction on archaeological
resour(o }lit sihst ant ial protection or salvage
measures provided by the Environmental
Impact. 11 -� Ovieo logical Report.
0 All ot1w r( je( t�
11. *Affordable liousin�;
No more than ten 1 1) p)ints shall be awarded pursuant to the
matrix below:
Percentage of Density n(.rease,l requested by income group•
5 10 30 35 40 45 50
Income Group
*Moderate
1 1 I
0
0
0
0 0
*Median
1 2 3
0
0
0
0 0
*Lower
0 7 3
10
10
10
10 10
*Very Low
£4 9 l+
10
10
10
10 10
*As clef in(,d I)y
the State Affc,r, i
I 1 :! Limits
for
Vontura
County pcI
Government ('o<le
Se't ion 5007`+
IZ/O
b. 12. Absence of Deleteri <ott Impact on the Physical and or Aesthetical
Environment
No more than ten nt s shall be awarded pursuant to this
criteria below.
Points Standarc:
10 The pro A, wi-l! not create any significant impacts
on air, w ter, fl"oding, plants, animals and noise,
takes ad% stage c »r natural features in its layout
and uiI :e.�gn, is compatible with adjacent land
uses, his i,sign eatures which add to the quality
of the T and - Os not significantly diminish any
scenic s P1 project does not take any land
out of ,lvo Mgricultural use.
7 The pi Gi
rc+ t c; minimal environmental impacts
which T
r . _iqh -ed
at no expense to any public
agency no
7 mi
>itible with the adjacent land uses
but de 2n
t n o
worate any exterior quality design
enhancom-
ley r
those required.
3 The i,I
�i.ates
significant environmental
impacts
4 71
mitigated by significant cash
contrih
or
w jor improvements. The project
involvo-
k Tg agricultural
land out of production
which n
In
effect upon adjacent agricultural
parcel,
o All oth.
C
b. 13. Needed Public Faciliti•
No more than ten , l ? p�) nt s tilral l be awarded pursuant to the
criteria below.
Points Standard
n -10 The pr ,
(.t pI.)vides needed on -site public
faci lit 1�
r arldition to those required and
provides
s'raro f off -site facilities required by
adopted
rirdirds, and policies and regulations,
plus tE
pro1"(-- provides on-site or off-site
criticrt 1
i :N a,"e in the major street system,
improvf.d
rr t i,)r,, 1 park land„ school rooms, or
other , t
11 1 i, I l it ies benefiting more than
just tl1.
> >I,ti, t tself, consistent with adopted
plans '>i
in 1 4gency that would administer the
part icu l
1 -S The >r
c l; )v ides needed on -site public
faciIit i
t , ;"T've the project, plus a
propor1.i
t }a rr-(, of off -site facilities, as
r.equiro-
h a ? )i ted star1dards, policies or
regula
0 All otli�
r ei I
SECTION 11. CONDITION ON_SUBDIVISION MA'S All tentative maps for subdivisions
of five or more residential dwelling sin
is which are governed by the
Residential
Development Management System and are opl
SECTION 10.
CONDITION
ON DEVELOPMENT KRMITS
or providing that the final
All entitlements for residential
development
subject to
this resolution
rcluam,
but not limited to Planned
Development
Permits and
Major Modif Wt
n+ to
IP rmits, which are approved by the
City during
the term of
this Resolut 0"
h "l1 1w
subject to a condition providing
that permit
approval is
complete but a
light
) development will occur and no
grading permit, building
permit, or 0 o,
.A V
entitlement will be issued for the
project unless
and until
a Development Ai
tnc =ut
; first awarded.
SECTION 11. CONDITION ON_SUBDIVISION MA'S All tentative maps for subdivisions
of five or more residential dwelling sin
is which are governed by the
Residential
Development Management System and are opl
rovod by the City during the
term of this
Ordinance shall be subject to a coed t
or providing that the final
map may be
approved and recorded prior to awarding,
. a Doy,lopment Allotment but
no right to
develop shall occur and no grading
"I mit, building permit, or
other City
entitlement will be issued for the ; I
i_,ion unless and until a
Development
Allotment is first ,awarded to the pr,
Vnere a tentative tract map on a
subdivision of five or more units wa
wn-ovoi prior to the effective
date of
Measure F, the final map may be nppro,4
no "I. rded prior to the awarding of a
Development Allotment . for land within
s�rbdinision, provided that
no right to
develop shall occur and no gradin,.
Writ, building permit, or
other City
entitlement shall be issued for the lar
w-th,in he subdivision unless
and until a
Permit Allotment is first awarded.
SECTION 12. ANNUAL DEVELOPMENT ALLO "1'Ih;iT
Tht annual allocation
of Development
Allotments may be modified
during the m
it 'r of October by the City
Council to an
amount not greater than ten
percent ( IQ
m"I e o less for any given
year, provided
that the annual allocation
for the next !
- eldinf year shall be set
higher or lower
as the case may be, in order
to redr -r q
1u; eict ss or deficiency.
No Development
Allocation shall he awarded
for the c,tl �
a yoa; 1986, nor qhall any future annual
allocations drawn upon the
Allotment;
rte y -Ar 1986 by virtue
of issuance of
2354 residential building
permits �.
111-ts the purpose
and intent of
Measure F for the year 1986
, 43
SECTION 13. 1987 FILING AND PROCESSIKK SCHEDULES All request for a 1987
Schedule "A" allotments shall have had in apps wed Tract Tract Map and Planned
Development Permit approved prior to June 1 08;
Schedule A- Applications for one - hundred
and fifty available Development Allotment
within seven (7) working days after the
(30) calendar days from the end of thn t
hearing in accordance with Section 7.A.
the City Council in accordance with So ,
Within thirty (30) days from the final
The City Council shrill hold a public n,
Section 7 and award allotments thereaK
tnd mvity -five (125) of the two- hundred
f7 th, calendar year 1987 shall be filed
0141 on A this resolution. Within thirty
in; period, the Board shall hold a public
t qua make it's final recommendations to
>r 1 trit no later than November 2, 1987.
)ard i-e( ommendat ions to the City Council.
ir,rf> i accordance with the criteria of
Schedule B- Applications fcr the romaiui ,rie- tin -rdred twenty -five (125) allotments
of the calendar year 1981 nhall be fil,a luring the first ten (10) working days of
February 1988. Within forty -five (45
1�endlr days from the end of the filing
period, the Board shall hold a pubii� 1
it rg ii accordance with Section 7.B. nn]
shall make it's final recommendations t
ie 7iiv Council in accordance with Section
7 but no later than March 31, 1988. 'w i
i r thi r ty (30) days from the final Boar.'
recommendations to the City Council, th,
Av Conical shall hold a public hearing in
accordance with the criteria of Section ,
1� await allotments thereafter.
SECTION 14. AMENMANTS CO PROJECTS Q
; EN ALL TMENTS GRANTED A project may be
- - - - - -- - --
amended upon submittal of a Minor or Q i
kn li fi( ation application made in the same
manner as the original application. Iii
p.> i,at ion for a Major Modification shat I
include a statement from tEQ applicant
2 1 not s forth the specific reasons for
requesting the modi- fication; and 2) >t
.icnlly how the major modification
meets the purpose and intc1n1 of Measui
tRi, nd the City's General Plan, Goals
and Policies
Y
The City Council shall review such a Mal
Cthe modification as requested, modify tli=
modification shall be granted only E
proposed modified project in relation tr,
'I. B. , shal l f ind that. the major mod i t i
points than the original project for uh <
for a major modification shrtll be madf,
original application evaluation points.
C
r Modification application and may grant
teluest, or deny the request. A major
he 4'It, Council, after reviewing the
set forth in Section 9.A. and
i }l,is earned as many or more evaluation
cht, A. otment was issued. No approvals
t } l o i( .t receiving Less points that the
GLINT HARPER, Ph.D.
Mayor
ISE BROWN
Jor Pro Tem
S C. FERGUSON
Councilmember
JOHN GALLOWAY
Councilmember
JOHN PATRICK LANE
Councilmember
MAUREEN W. WALL
City Clerk
t
MOORPAR-Ik_
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF VENTURA ) SS.
CITY OF MOORPARK )
v ►Pµ °i
iv
STEVEN KUENY 1
City Manager �---
CHERYL J.KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A I.C.P.
Director of
Community Development
R DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
THOMAS P. GENOVESE
City Treasurer
I, Maureen W.
Wall, City Clerk ;,t
;i -v cf Moorpark,
California, do
hereby certify
under penalty of i — i
y the foregoing
Resolution No.
87 -421 was
adopted by the Ci�-
�i,I i f the City of
Moorpark at a
STEVEN KUENY 1
City Manager �---
CHERYL J.KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A I.C.P.
Director of
Community Development
R DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
THOMAS P. GENOVESE
City Treasurer
I, Maureen W.
Wall, City Clerk ;,t
;i -v cf Moorpark,
California, do
hereby certify
under penalty of i — i
y the foregoing
Resolution No.
87 -421 was
adopted by the Ci�-
�i,I i f the City of
Moorpark at a
meeting held on
the `'3rd clay , f
- `_
�'u`.e� "�ber' 19_C7_
— -
and that the
same was adopted by the f(�)llnwinq
AYES: Counc=lmembers Brown, I.- � loway and Mayor Harper.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Councilmember Lane.
ABSTAIN: None.
WITNESS my hand and the officia' is City this _ 19 day of
October 19 87
�`.� "�'UOrj ;3!k /�iVEnUr� �'.f(X if ll;S�i li i.. ���
ATTACHMENT 2
RESOLUTE 3 -722
A RESOLUTION OF THE I "I' CO[JNCIL OF THE
CITY OF MOORPARK, ('A I 'ORN1 A, AMENDING
THE RESIDENTIAL ,MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM
WHEREAS, on Septembe
adopted the Residential Devel
pursuant to Resolution No. 8 --
i, 1)8'7, the City Council
gmen!� Management System
} ' ; _. :d
WHEREAS, the City Co nc I now desires to amend said
Residential Development Manage merit S rstem;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE :7Y C(DUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK DOES HEREBY RESOLVE S i'OLI_ <)WS
SECTION 1. The C1ty
determines that the amendmenr.
Management System will not a
environment and that a Neg,.it i
the Clerk of the County of
SECTION 2. The City
amendment to the Residenti,�.E
as set forth in Exhibit "1
incorporated herein by refer,
SECTION 3. Any legs
resolution, in whole or in lit
competent jurisdiction wit "_,
following the passage and
SECTION 4. The Cit
adoption of this resolution
and her cert'.fication to bf-
Clerk.
'ctnci hereby finds and
`e Residential Development
i ficant effect on the
P -I. ration be filed with
c: t n :_ hereby approves the
�E pr�ent Management System
Hereto and
f.
&Ct for to challenge this
miist be filed in a court of
ir. (30) days immediately
r, this resslut:ion.
If r: hall certify to the
sh�11 cause this resolution
ci tt.e office of the City
PASSED, APPROVED -_his 16th day
of November
ATTEST:
C'I "Y OF MOORPARK
i
MAYOR
q�)
, Z/i
EXE:I I.
Amendment Residential
Development. t. System
follows: Exhibit "A" of Res; t ;. _n %D. 87 -421 is amended as
(a) Section e1:1t.ed Allotment Required
For Builci, :g )r Grading Permits, of
Exhibit P rfvised in its entirety to
read as 1
"A. Buiia..nq Permits No building permit
for a non- ..xempt residential dwelling
unit may b• _ssueij unless a residential
developmen au_lot;nent for the unit has
been award-d, prc- �vided that such building
permits h 1. not be issued in excess of
500 per ca e::ciar year. The permits shall
be issues::, :, 4: _i -st_ come, first serve
basis ai.c: the dates that the
applica
filed w permits are deemed
r v.
B. Gradi n
r:ni' s No grading permit
for a pr
"I wining non - exempt
resident :1
� ny units may be issued
unless
f e_en an award of
allotme:r
:_ project. When the award
is for
e entire project,
grading
rc: h� immediate area of the
lots for
11 applicant proposes to
Utilize,
:. i- e -:ts shall- be allowed in
accordar
<:, Follcwi,lg:
: c ant executes, in a form
apr.r
% city attorney, a
wa
t "rl , , laim of a vested right
to h
rr�m Measure F as a
resu
c t c,r , ing beyond the area for
whi(-
h' << , )' -vents have been awarded
anti
a Ldgment that the
de.c
c, rnt' s any r irks that may
f ' -:r.rni'ncemer,t of grading
pr
_ :,�..rd of �:llotments for
has teen awarded
aL
t le.� ;t 15' of the
All -(i shall be treated
with
n:l :,c,r�
nq, as deemed
Z/-P
k
number
of non- exempt residential
,col,,
��l.epment. , to prevent
dwel ".rig
-ni -s in a project consisting
the grading and to
redl.i(
Of not
more ::han 175 lots, in which
gra i
even,
he grading may be carried out
r ±.:t
ed Street Traffic
for
nt:i:e project; or
on A, entitled
Availabi
3.
-Acpl.cant has been awarded
Services
<<_t
al lo, r-
nt ,; cc; ; at least. 15% of the
ter,
cf Exhibit "A" is
numb(,:
.,f nor;- exempt residential units
—ty tc r-ai] as
follows:
in thy-
fi. -st onase of a project
6. St
cons.:
i1� t more than 175 lots, in
whICr
v it. ".he grading shall be
earn(-
)it n phases. The phases
shat.
e lel:neated by the
deve'.c
per. No phase shall consist of
more .
a i 1.7': lots. Grading of the
first
ha,e may commence once 15% of
the �J'
e;; ;ar allotments for that
p h a s
neen awarded. Grading of
the E
� ;,1 : hisie and each phase
ther -,-
nC, l commence once 75% of
,-he r�
; ;ar;� allotments for the
pre
have been awarded.
The
.c irG ...i l may approve or
Ccond
t
D'I,il iy approve grading in a
mar,
t Ierwise provided for in
thi _,
sec -: )r7 upon a finding that
str i, t
)rip i. ince with the
prc:
paragraph 2 or 3 would
wor t
; ;hs -a It ial economic or
enq -1,
-. rrdship on the project.
All -(i shall be treated
with
n:l :,c,r�
nq, as deemed
aPP"
k
the Director of
Coma
,col,,
��l.epment. , to prevent
erc;
LP_
the grading and to
redl.i(
:impact_; or the
gra i
(b) Paragraph
r ±.:t
ed Street Traffic
Impact , >r
on A, entitled
Availabi
i;11c Facilities and
Services
<<_t
r 9, entitled
Evaluat-I
ter,
cf Exhibit "A" is
revised
—ty tc r-ai] as
follows:
6. St
I[T1paCt
cjk /AGP4702
�9
f
No applica ion shall be awarded more than
ten (10) f in s.
Points Standard
9 - 10 The project will provide,
or has provided, needed
street improvements which
are above and beyond the
improvements normally
required by the City and
which will substantially
improve, or have
substantially improved,
en.icular traffic
conditions in a larger
area than just the project
it 3eLf. To qualify, the
apo icant must: have paid,
sr have agreed to pay, any
traffic mitigation fees
normally required by the
ty and, if the project
in within the Los Angeles
Avenue. Tierra
Rpjada /Spring Road or
Q ohert /Casey Road Area of
7c i° ribution, the
3f;oAcant must have made a
«, L° ten waiver of any
3ht to protest payment
;aid Area of
.'c> 7r: r ibut ion fees to the
lent the fees do not
on .F ed the per dwelling
rr, _1 amount in effect as
October 31, 1988.
6 - 8 UK, project will provide,
)r has provided, a
W astantial cash
Itribution above and
nP Mond the fees normally
ne l" i red Dy the City for
W fic mitigation or the
1I ) cut will advance, or
i_ , .advanced, the funds .so
r r� neodod street
>> wvwmenl E can be
IN
c jk /AGR4 ; 0?
_onstructed or installed
Dr.or to the time that
utficient traffic
ni-igation fees have been
-�c: lected to finance the
it ;vovement. To qualify,
-K applicant must have
-,a d, or have agreed to
.,a„, any traffic
i'igation fees normally
:eyuired by the City, must
ave provided, or agreed
-o provide, any street
improvements normally
required by the City, and
if the project is within
,_he Los Angeles Avenue,
Tierra Rejada /Spring Road
r Gaubert /Casey Road Area
Y Contribution, the
.pp licant must have made a
..r tt:en waiver of any
inht to protest: payment
f said Area of
o;tribution fees to the
ent the fees do not
eed the per dwelling
n t amount in effect as
Cctober Y, 1988.
5 'hi- project will pay, or
'a paid, all traffic
-itigation fees normally
e uired by the City, and
�ill provide, or has
F _ vided, al! street
m tovements normally
k u red by the City. If
project is within the
Angeles Avenue, Tierra
Pe ada /Spring Road or
ta bert /Casey Road Area of
trlbuti2n, to qualify
applicant must have
3 e n written waiver of
Lght to protest
W ment If said area of
t i bu K on tee3 to the
_ ) he Ups do not
C
exceed the per dwelling
t un t amount in effect as
of )ctober 31, 1988.
cjj ?.G�; IO2
0 :,1. ether projects."
(c) Paraq:ipn i2. entitled Annual
Deve._( .)me -t. allotment, of exhibit
"A" de1etod in its entirety.
C
MOORPARK
JOHN GALLOWAY
Mayor
ELOISE BROWN
Mayor Pro Tern
CLINT HARPER, Ph.D.
Councilmember
JOHN PATRICK LANE
Councilmember
MAUREEN W. WALL
City Clerk
THOMAS P. GENOVESE
City Treasurer
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF VENTURA ) SS.
CITY OF MOORPARK )
I, Maureen W.
Wall,
EVEN KUENY
�h -, City✓ of Moorpark, California, do
hereby certify
City Manager
penalty of [w r
jr✓ that the foregoing Resolution No.
CHERYL J. KANE
/row
by the City
City Attorney
meeting held on
the ___16th
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
ry mber 1988, and that the
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
I, Maureen W.
Wall,
City Clerk o¢
�h -, City✓ of Moorpark, California, do
hereby certify
under
penalty of [w r
jr✓ that the foregoing Resolution No.
88 -522 _ was
adopted
by the City
utcil of the City of Moorpark at a
meeting held on
the ___16th
(jay ()
ry mber 1988, and that the
same was adopted by the following .
AYES: Councilmembers Brown, N r .r Perez and Mayor Lane.
NOES: None..
ABSENT: Councilmember Galloway
ABSTAIN: None.
WITNESS my hand and the official f aid ;;ity this _ 7th _ day of
December , 1988.
Maureen W. Wall,
City Clark
(seal)
799 ;OOr;�:3; �'��� r;.� ( Q ) E 1
ATTACHMENT 3
CITY OF MOORPARK
MMCN1[°1
DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
DEVELOPMEN"
1; r! NF.t r
Application
Form
SUBMITTAL
City of Moorpark
Community Development Dept.
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, California 93021
(805) 529 -6864
APP, CATION
5f
t oCn'- App l ication No. :� �7)A - 9 ( - l
iori ('Q:
La: e i 1 'd 1 _9
Rey t 1110 -. "? y 9 I
NOTE: Prior to the submittal of the a:)}
the requested proposal with the Depait
Residential Development Management Sys +
as accurate and complete as possibl«, .
assistance, contact the Ccmmunity
Devt, ;
cation it is advised that the applicant disc
nt i )rder to review the requirements of
lr+ )mpleting the application form, please
l yc L should have any questions or requ
�rt ["'; �lrtment.
A T I C A "TI'
Applicant: ABE GUN;'
Address: 616 Fit. ✓, f ?c:orUar_k, CA 93021
- -- . _
Phone: (SOS) 523 -7965 ---
_ _Contact i'� �unv
Architect:
Address:
Phone: - --
_ — - - -- __ --- -- - i" o n t. a c t ,
Engineer
Address:
CPhone:
Lockman & Associates
1534 Eastman Ave. #A, 1 CA 93003
-- ( -1 t r 3 J_ _ _..—
(805) 644 -3130 _Contact Person ?i.: 1. Jenson
Property Owner: Abe Guny
Address: 616 Fitch Ave -r ilor,rnark
Phone: (805) 523 -7965 off. Contact Person _`,be Guny
home
(Attach additional list for multiple owners
ALLOTMi• tfr REQUEST
I hereby
request a Development Allotment tie
3w,irded
for the following project:
Case No.:
Tentative Tract. Map 44652
-- C,:sev
Road
_ c!wel'.
the request is for an Allotment of
ing units
from the total of 18
dwelling
units, which would leave
unite
without
allocation contained in the
project.
The project has 0 units t:
.oi:it(�d
which are
not sold or built. A map is
included
with the submittal showing the 1
t—or r;);
the units
requested if the project is
proposed
to be phased.
The subject project is classified as bein: it the RE & I2E5
-.- Zone and is
XX PP �
a roved _ pending. f hrcj,, +t is npproved, indicnte
expiration date: Ma 15, 1994
C
S-75
:RTIFICATlON
This application can only
be filed i
pro ect has a previously
approved testa
subdivision and RFD
permit
application f
,cr- tra :7 established filing
period.
Measure "F ", the Residential Developmoil
been in effect since November 4, 1986
• residential project (except certain e)<'
• Deve lcoment Allotment has been obtain,
to proceed, subject to all other app€
construct a residential unit, includ;n;
has not commenced within two years of d3f
may revoke it.)
`tanag(-nent System of the City of Moorpark,
:t -)roh bits the issuance of building permits
gyp' pro acts) until and unless
i. A rj,yvelopment Allotment is basically a ri
a} -lc r- 1q11irements, with all steps necessary
S"Lillicfl Of a building permit. (If construct
tri of . Development Allotment, the City Coun
During 1987 and each year thereafter " i, , the City Council is permitted by
Ordinance to award Development Allotm, -r, 10= :50 residential dwelling units (plus
minus up to 10% at the Council's di ,
'. >s certain adjustments, as specified
Measure "F" itself. All ellgible pr-�
)T .flich a Development Allotment applicat.
is filed in accordance with the appl i.r. .1 � �'�,3 cments, wi 11 bra consi(3ered for award
Development Allotment..
~ APPLI
An application may be filed only by -t
power of attorney from the owner auto
representing the owner-. Innicate your ,i,
XX
:nrrr` � slc�rnnJRr•.
1wuIr at the property or by a person with t
:rg thr application, or by the ittorney-at-I
I am the owner of
the { i
;)er -y
is attached.
I have the power
of i3tic
-iey fror
the property owner authorizing
the application ',n a
a :opy o
of the authorization i
is attached.
_ I am the attorney-at -1_�, e
e>- esFrting t
the owner and a c
copy of the
authorization is r< t
t a ,ied.
I (We), iABE GUNY
duly sworn do depose and say that (I) (.�r a
an) (ire) t
the owner(s) or a
applicant(s) here
named and that the foregoing statement a
an-wc s
s herein contained a
and the informati
herein submitted are in all respects tt, T
Ti c�ar—r-t t
to the best of (my) (our) knowled
A b 1
an e ief.
n n
YI /
Signature
print.) Date
' CONSENT BY OWNER (r,�ff'R _. _
S _ _nN3kNT 5
7
If applicant is Other than owner, owm`r �,i consenting to filing.
I (We),
(um) (are) the -----
e o�ner(x) o� the ;uo '! c pro|`.rty and consent to the filing OE
application.
5jxn of Owner
Date
PADC7 .._7KFnRM&TI0N
Property Acquired (date) ^' Decemh',�
_
Legal description ________Portioo Lot D 'Poindex ter Sub" R.M.
"" uk 5 op oo9]�<l ce IMI
' Book Locut ion Iort� of Casey Page /
the Ci�y of aloot Canyon ^
Road iu
Assessor Parcel No. �lI-O�0-U2S, SIl-82O U]5
Cross St - '
Street (s) __[�se� lkzad G
Current Zoning D2 � DES -------
-- Aroo 7.I acres
Genocul plan Doxignaticn �------
_L.L(���-,/z�
'
WATER
UT |l. TY i�RV|CE3
�
(ExixcinX Facilities/11,c `s*1 FnciliLies):
ml
Existing siz"/lucot`nr lZ/ +/- /
Proposed connects to eristioa.
Length of extension t' ^r,.` o,co^r�v 25'
AGENCY
�
SEWER Existing ntze/locurio,:
GAS
Proposed
AGENCY
' . --'
�e��oca County �at zworks #1
l)" --�� lIne 6` +/ o/o CT, Casey Road.
�
`-jelc-per connects i i
County 1qaterworks #1
Existing vizc/locatizn 2' li�`e 10 u/o C Casey Road
Proposed �'�zel'��er connects to existing
Length of e
extension -r c
c c pc'.'ercy 3'
AGENCY _
_ �
�/zt�,`co California Gas Co,
ELECTRICITY CzlscinC ,
,ize/lncati',n s
s��e� / s«otbezll' property line
C
P! [AS 1 NG
Previous applications:
RPD
none
t
Dates of expiration:
RPD
none
act
Total number of dwelling
units
in pro
eighteen
Total number of dwelling
units
request i
eighteen
Anticipated construction date for each )1;,SE,;
Dec /1991
Number of dwelling units for each phase
eighteen
Attach a map indicating Phasing plan.
see attached
'r(; :HA-1-i RES
Describe existing features and proposed c!1 t,
�f' -` 3.t,��ch grading plan)
Topography undeveloped, rolling t i1L ��rrain, with a natural drainaqe
swage that trav( rses
Existing Vegetation /Btiildin,;r, nati"70 —
3 1 -, Tr "a slancl, and 11011— native
reel s1)ocles. �
- --
131c,�1 ., di]�ir
rernoveci. _ I ar w�t_er storacle to
-- —
_ �-
A
g �_nturr�; no;1e
c
Type of building proposed
Type of construction
DEVFJA mi.,N'r PROPOSAL
sincle- farr.i. v homes
frame and s uc-co w /wood trim, tile roofs
&-0
Building height 18 - -=8
-
_ Number of stories Angle & ".vo -s
Access: Exist: ing Casev Ro ic,
Proposed alternate e
tr�_ir,>i-ox. 3 , 000' north off ,Ialnut Cv
Circulation: On Site Street "A" t
rougfl -.o both entries, cul -de -sacs "B"
Parking spaces: Enclosed double car
e each Mouse
Open drivewav e 3
Y rouse, and at curbs
r Lot Coverage 15% to 2C`,
___ ...
6
Site Paving o
o Site Open Space 74Q to 7(1"
Site in Slopes varies
Price Range $250,000 to 300, 000
-
1350
Size of Units to 2400 sa
Building '"iaterials (Type /color /finish /t #,. t
Roofing non- combustable the
Walls lumber frame w -'h stucco
part;-, and natural colors
—..
Trim /Accents wood window &roof trim.
_._
,ant= astinr ac_cen
__t colors
Windows metal frame, single- glaz�c.
Other Element
'low does the project provide linkages (
or streets?
e.�sriic public facilities such as, ntiliti
developer's completion
-
called Almecruere) provides a
=- - -_ -_— - --
o: ..her v alternate street (commonly
access to acprox. 10
pre- existing hor,,,,
— _(CurrentV r3 1
t r 11
Detention j)a r cc���
�—
Flood Control
ralna�7e floe into Walnut
z
C.� I
What contributions does the project -
v ( o f:
r extending grrerihe)'s,
hike at,
space areas, etc.?
All trees
removed during const_..c
---on
.dill be replaced in
accord with
Citv Ord. =101. Northerly par(,°(
'.d L1 !
Ln all probability
include a
greenbelt in conjunction wi t. -
�,, i- _ :
1t.ro1 in future.
What provisions does the project provit.
F-,r n
;i.te or off-site private
/public open s;
areas and facilities?
Standard contribution to Quirnk v
nd.
z
A Md
(A/ 77,4'� CITy
1 0
PORT /ON of Z 0 TS 'FACT
LOCFATION lf�,W
;-RAC 7-
e4SZ- Y N
0 m 0 ---1
aogD
C.
Ay'
E r
i
� n
- - - - - — tai. ►ttt_ c 5: 1 '
jr
rREET
i _ � �,5. �� - �:: � --•-�- -±'�: 7�--^' rte. t - � e- _ -. .. -_
��� �� �� J•�.�r �6'. fa ��.. r�f !r"----- - --.I—
1�
_ -��. .� rI I!( ✓.. nom., °c ��, i'. !1 � ^,� _��aC `��,ti --� —T R-EEr I �, i TN�!! ..- y• �'...yi r"..+.+r. � -.-. t�r ..-.� Mai..
— `✓ C t,, t - �._ ' r PRELihiNARY GRADING PLA
_- -- - --
o TRACT NO. 4652
I �. _ � � - _ _- - J- � � �� .. o ✓" �. � � .. r .. n - �— �j er+-c . n� -.rr. n rn7 �- .,o tr cr nc Ro�,�'rR
i
_ -- —
- _ - - _ - _' = - --.>_- _--_fi�••r � � . i — • �1� i i t' � - 1 . - -- "-�"'ri� .. F11) - � --� . - c,. . .r .a... i � RYt cr 4c1 k HD•S ,n Yrwr ., 5 or
'" L+ r,X, rr
..�rSQcw li. 4c.�
C23
Yd E! I U I Sl,tIT