HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1991 1002 CC REG ITEM 11F ITEM. / /. F.'
F�P %", MOORPARK
IXC ,tke
A�. . Jiir'HI2K, I.HLIh.UIa;Cfi-.
WG � ^ 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93024-;ryCo( ` 564
9^' o J0-4 0 L 199j
ACTION: if l . 0 0/
71//MEMORANDUM
(V/G.' �i
-
;wfl
Ry
1A,444.s"--#
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community Development
DATE: September 27, 1991 (CC Meeting of 10/2/91)
SUBJECT: OPTIONS FOR PAYMENT OF GENERAL PLAN UPDATE CONTRACT
AMENDMENT COSTS
Background
On September 12, 1991, a revised contract and a settlement
agreement were signed with PBR for completion of the General Plan
Update. The additional money to be paid to PBR, which is more than
the former contract amount, totals $82,959 .
Discussion
At the Budget and Finance Committee meeting of September 11, 1991
there was discussion regarding options for payment of the
additional $82,959 . It is the recommendation of the Budget and
Finance Committee to request additional payment by the 10 General
Plan Update applicants using the past Average Daily Traffic
generation as the method of determining each individual applicants
costs . However, since the Westland Company (GPA89-1G) has been
approved as a separate application; there may be some consideration
not to consider them within any spread of additional General Plan
Update costs .
Listed below are the original ten General Plan Update applicants
with estimated ADT counts based upon the Austin-Foust Associations
traffic study. The original ADT spread was created by staff prior
to any detailed traffic study and does include different ADT
numbers. Inasmuch as these are current ADT's the table below was
created as such:
C��WP5I\GPU\ADTCOSTI.CC
PAUL W. LAWRASON JR. BERNARDO M. PEREZ SCOTT MONTGOMERY ROY E. TALLEY JR. JOHN E. WOZNIAK
Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember
Printed On Recycled Paper
The Honorable City Council
September 27, 1991
Page -2-
TABLE A
Average Daily Trips = $2.03
CURRENT PROPOSED
GPA NO. APPLICANT GP GP ADT(M-F) COSTS
89-1A Anderson VH C2 5,927 $12,031.81
89-18 ESTES AG1 H 1,155 2,344.65
89-1C GUNY OS1 RL 110 223.30
89-1D JER OS1,RL L,M,H,RH, 13,687 27,784.61
C1,51,5,
1),(2-13
89-1E KAVLI RH I1 2,620 5,318.60
89-1F LEVY CO. AG1 C2,H,L,M, 11,467 23,278.01
RH,P
89-1G WESTLAND ML H,VH 2,210 4,486.30
89-1H MUSD S H,VH 1,757 3,566.71
89-1I SCARONI ML CO 525 1,065.75
89-11 SCHLEVE RL RH,OS1, 1,426 2,894.78
VH,P
RECOMMENDATION
1. That the City Council determine that the spread for additional
General Plan Update costs as shown on Table A is appropriate
and direct staff to request additional deposits from the
applicants .
C:\WP51\CPV\ADTC0S7I.CC