HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2013 0515 CCSA REG ITEM 09B ITEM 9.13.
�,iiy C:otindi Weetino
�Y- 51g= a�3
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL ----
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
t �
FROM: David A. Bobardt, Community Development Director
DATE: April 17, 2013 (CC Meeting of 5115/2013)
SUBJECT: Consider Request of Councilmember Millhouse to Conduct a Public
Hearing on General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening Application No.
2012-02 (Coastline RE Holdings Moorpark) without Review by the
City Council Community and Economic Development Committee
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
On October 26, 2012, Residential Strategies, LLC filed an application on behalf of
Coastline RE Holdings Moorpark for a General Plan Amendment Pre-screening
proposing to expand the City's corporate boundaries and CURB to develop 552 to 765
homes of various densities on approximately 200 acres of a 665-acre site north of
Moorpark College on land currently outside the City corporate boundaries. A conceptual
site plan is attached.
On December 19, 2012, the City Council authorized a public workshop at a Special City
Council Meeting on February 27, 2012 to go over the project and the review process,
and to take early comments and questions from the public on this project. This
workshop was in addition to the General Plan Amendment process established by
Resolution No. 2008-2672. After listening to comments and questions from the public,
the Council directed staff to return with an approach for Council consideration where the
application would be set for public hearing and decision by the City Council without first
going to the Community and Economic Development Committee.
On March 20, 2013, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2013-3166 (Attachment
2), amending the procedure for the pre-screening of General Plan Amendment
requests. The amended procedure included a provision that allows a Councilmember to
request a public hearing on a General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening application
without review by the Community and Economic Development Committee, when the
application has not been previously scheduled for review by the Community and
Economic Development Committee.
96
Honorable City Council
May 15, 2013
Page 2
On April 2, 2013, Councilmember Millhouse submitted a request (Attachment 3) for the
City Council to hold a public hearing on General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening
Application No. 2012-02 (Coastline RE Holdings Moorpark) without review by the City
Council Community and Economic Development Committee. If the City Council
approves this request, the application will be scheduled for a public hearing at a future
City Council meeting. If the City Council denies this request, the application will be
scheduled for review and recommendation of the Community and Economic
Development Committee before a public hearing is scheduled before the City Council.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Direct staff as deemed appropriate.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Conceptual Site Plan
2. Resolution No. 2013-3166
3. Letter from Councilmember Millhouse
97
PROJECT ACREAGE
PROPERTY LIMITS
4 3805.7 AC.
"
PROPOSED PROJECT BOUNDARY,
.101
C.U.R.B.
VIM Z:0�� 665.9 AC.
A
a&'
OPW C r ,J � ��)1 \�u 1-Mm"Mil M
:3 Rd,
I/f1fm Nhi
INA"
51
"'F/
:6)
L
Of
WiS
W
& Pro po
�� ��'/=�J� `�q���� �, ��� ' � r� (� f ��l ) I�r����+��,..11 r��✓�S I 1, ,: i � -�;/
)h
0
0
>
roposed Project Boundary,
VQ. Urban Restriction Boundary 'C'C..
0
Z
INV/, �r/,7
LEGEND
PROPERTY LIMITS
PREPARED BY.•
PROPOSED PROJECT BOUNDARY & C.U,R.B.
• POSSIBLE TANK SITE
'bA
ANNEXATION EX1981T mum 48�1&�MMAT 3
. . I . . c .
MOORPARIC PROJECT
CID
RESOLUTION NO. 2013-3166
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING AN AMENDED
PROCEDURE FOR THE PRE-SCREENING OF GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENTS AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION
NO. 2008-2672
WHEREAS, on January 16, 2008, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2008-
2672 updating the procedures for pre-screening of general plan amendments; and
WHEREAS, at its meeting of March 20, 2013, the City Council considered an
amendment to the pre-screening process for general plan amendments, which would
allow a Councilmember to request that a General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening
application be scheduled for public hearing before the City Council without review by the
Community and Economic Development Committee and require that City Council
decisions on General Plan Amendment Pre-Screening applications be made by
resolution; and
WHEREAS, it is desirable to establish a procedure for pre-screening all
applications for general plan amendments and to provide public notice to the adjacent
properties and a public hearing in accordance with Section 17.44.070 of the Moorpark
Municipal Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Resolution 2008-2672 is hereby rescinded.
SECTION 2. PRE-SCREENING PROCEDURE: The City Council hereby
amends the City's pre-screening procedure for the processing of general plan
amendments as shown in Exhibit A, attached.
SECTION 3. CERTIFICATION OF ADOPTION: The City Clerk shall certify to
the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a cause a certified resolution to be filed in
the book of original resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of March, 2013.
*S Parvin, Mayor
/ATTEST:
Maureen Benson, City Clerk
Attachment- Exhibit A Pre-Screening Procedures °oq ��CC ATTACHMENT 2
99
Resolution No. 2013-3166
Page 2
EXHIBIT A
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PRE-SCREENING APPLICATION
REVIEW PROCEDURE
PURPOSE:
To provide a pre-screening review procedure for property owners or their agents to
present information to the City Council related to proposals for amendments to the
General Plan.
APPLICATION:
An application for pre-screening must be submitted to the Community Development
Department on the Universal Application form along with appropriate accompanying
maps and materials required by the Community Development Department and a deposit
to process the application consistent with the adopted Council resolution. Application
materials may be obtained from the Community Development Department, Moorpark
City Hall, 799 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, California, 93021 or on the City's website at
www.ci.moorpark.ca.us.
SUBMITTAL CYCLES:
Two application submittal cycles are established in November and May for each
calendar year.
ACTION CYCLE 1 CYCLE 2
Application Cycle Deadline November 301h May 31st
(Application must be deemed
complete by this date)
Community and Economic Not later than the following Not later than the following
Development Committee March regular meeting September regular meeting
(CEDC)Recommendation
City Council Public Hearing Not later than the second Not later than the second
and Decision regular meeting in May regular meeting in November
Except as provided below, all complete pre-screening applications are reviewed by the
standing City Council Community and Economic Development Committee. The
Committee recommendation regarding the requested amendment shall be forwarded to
the full Council for a decision on whether or not to accept an application for amendment.
A Councilmember may request in writing within 30 days of the application cycle
deadline that the City Council conduct a public hearing on the General Plan Amendment
Pre-Screening application without review by the Community and Economic
Development Committee. Such request will be considered by the City Council within 60
days of the application cycle deadline. Any application submitted in the November 30,
2012 cycle not previously scheduled for review by the City Council Community and
Economic Development Committee shall be subject to Councilmember's written request
to have the City Council conduct the public hearing described below without review by
the City Council Community and Economic Development Committee, if such written
request is received by April 19, 2013. Such request, if received, shall be considered by
the City Courcil by May 20, 2013.
100
Resolution No. 2013-3166
Page 3
A duly advertised and noticed public hearing shall be held by the City Council on the
pre-screening application to determine whether the Council decides to approve or deny
the filing of a formal application for amendment. The City Council decision shall be
made by resolution. In accordance with Section 17.44.060(D) of the Zoning Ordinance,
no resubmittal of a similar application may be made for one (1) year after a denial
decision.
101
Resolution No. 2013-3166
Page 4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF VENTURA ) ss.
CITY OF MOORPARK )
I, Maureen Benson, City Clerk of the City of Moorpark, California, do hereby
certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing Resolution No. 2013-3166 was
adopted by the City Council of the City of Moorpark at a regular meeting held on the
20th day of March, 2013, and that the same was adopted by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers Millhouse, Van Dam, and Mayor Parvin
NOES: Councilmembers Mikos and Pollock
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said City this 3rd day of April, 2013.
.�-
Maureen Benson, City Clerk
(seal)
P K
PQ
O,
4o9RTFD J�vy
102
Keith F. Millhouse
City of Moorpark
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
April 2,2013
VIA EMAIL AND U.S.MAIL
Mayor Janice Parvin
City Manager Steven Kueny
City of Moorpark
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark,California 93021
Dear Honorable Mayor Parvin and Mr. Kueny:
Pursuant to Resolution 2013-3166, 1 would like to formally request that the City Council
conduct a public hearing on General Amendment Pre-Screening application of Coastline RE
Holdings Moorpark for its proposed project north of Moorpark College, without review by the
Community and Economic Development Committee.
Very truly yours,
KEITH F. MILLHOUSE
Member,Moorpark City Council
KFM/rl
CC ATTACHMENT 3
103