HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1991 0626 CC ADJ ITEM 09CITE M 9. '8• C •
MOORPARK
08fi l Vaue t,• "oorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864
r' - ?,r i
M E M O R A� N D U M
OORPARK, CALIFORNIA
City Council Meeting
of 199
ON:��
4 BY
Ei2 0��
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Susan Cauldwel ssistant to the City Manager
DATE: June 11, 1991
SUBJECT: Consider Levying Assessments for AD84 -2 and AD85 -1
The Engineer's Reports for the Lignting and Landscaping Maintenance
Assessment District (AD84 -2) and the Parks Maintenance Assessment
District (AD85 -1) were accepted ny the City Council on May 15,
1991. One June 5, 1991, a public hearing was conducted to receive
protests to the proposed assessments. One person protested the
proposed parks assessment. To da`e, no written protests have been
received. The public hearing i. s , t i.:'..l open.
The attached resolutions must be approved no later than June 30,
1991 in order for the assessments ^..o be levied. In prior years the
City Council has adopted the soLuta.ons concurrent with the
adoption of the budget.
Staff Recommendations
1. Close the public hears -nos for .AD84 -2 and AD85 -1.
2. Adopt Resolution 91 -____ __ making certain changes to AD84 -
2 and confirming the assessments for FY91/92.
3. Adopt Resolution 91- ___.__ ._ making certain changes to AD85 -
1 and confirming the a:- essmer.ts for FY91/92.
attachments
PAUL W LAWRASON JR. BERNARDO M PEREZ SCC,'T a, NTGOMk H ( ROY E TALLEY JR JOHN E WOZNIAK
Mayor Mayor P,o T,m -':o . ,er ,, , Councilmember Councilmember
MOORPARK
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, 'California 93021
M E M O S N N D II M
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Direz47tor of Public Work
DATE: June 19, 1991 (Council Meeting 6- 19 -91)
(805) 529 -6864
SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT PERTAINING TO:
Final Draft Budget for Assessment District 84 -2
for Fiscal Year 1991/9.;°
OVERVIEW
This presents recommended adju,tments to the amount of the
assessments previously provided _n.) the city Council.
DISCUSSION
It is recommended that the amouni of the City Wide Assessment be
increased $13,904.00. This i_ncx -ease is to cover the following
identified additional costs:
1) the estimated cost ($8,1:00) of a pilot program to reduce
the urban glare to the night time sky by modifying
designated street light- and
2) an amount ($5,904) equa to an identified deficiency in
previously identified ssessments related to utility
costs.
If this increase is approved, the amount of the City Wide
Assessment will increase from $2?:,J,307 to $294,211. This will in
increase the per residential lot ssessment from $31.44 to $33.00
-- an increase of $1.56 per year. This revised assessment does not
reflect any salary /benefit adju.- °.meats that may be subsequently
approved by the City Council.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Direct staff to increase the am(... unt of the AD84 -2 Assessment by
$13,904 to cover the additional :)sts described herein.
PAUL W LAWRASON JR BFRNARDO M PEREZ SU "' NT C Mi I4v ttOY E_ TALLEY JR JOHN E WOZNIAK
Mayor Mayor F'ro r em — nt F Councllmember Councllmember
TO
FROM
DATE:
MOORPARK
799 Moorpark Avenue `toorpark, California 93021
MEMORANDUM
The Honorable City Council
(805) 529 -6864
Philip E. Newhouse. Director of Community
Services
June 21, 1991
SUBJECT: Revised Park Assessment District 85 -1 Figures
The proposed 1991/92 expendit.
parks and Community Center 4ei
Engineer prior to formal pre,w)
The Engineer's report presentee,
meeting incorporated projectei
time, the Community Center co
total assessment: figures. IV
1991/92 budget document, thF-
maintenance costs for the Ccmm
to be funded by the General E',i
(Gann) from 1990/91. As a r-rev
with excess pr >ceed: of taxes
Presented for your conside]-at.
District report showing the f':;
operation of the Communit,r
proposed assessment cost cr
$354,161. This represents a
to a single family home. r
single family home was $3
assessment wo ild b�_, $32. 11 E
revised assessment. does n,.1
adjustments r `:at m<iy be silt
Council.
PEN :db
Attachment
C(IL fc r maintenance of the
D:_ov_..:1ed to the Assessment
atic>n of the draft budget.
at t lie May 15, 1991, Council
>f $419,206. At that
wa i eluded as part of the
ti >re_aration of the draft
e ' 3c;nr.e L and operation and
_tr C: nter are now proposed
ari�i er:,ess proceeds of taxes
dJ >; ; t'te se co:3ts were funded
ar 1s a revised Assessment
es wh :�h reflect no cost for
n r. The total revised,
1 in FY 1991/92 is
6 i' YF fuction in assessments
v, the assessment to a
'he revised proposed
r •4. ? f=amily home. This
any salary /benefit
approved by the City
PAUL W LAWRASON JR. BERNARDO M PEREZ SCOT' r;- 4T(,OVEPY ROY E TALLEY JR JOHN E WOZNIAK
Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Councilmember Councilmember
Parks Assessment District AD -85 -1
FY 1991/1992
FINANICAL SUMMARY ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT FIGURES
Personnel
Comm . Cnt.
Parks
Subtotal:
Comm Cent M/O
PKS. M & O
Engineering
Subtotal
Peach Hill Revent ($4,500.00)
Comm. Cnt.Rev ($12,000.00)
Subtotal:
TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE FUNDED
BY DISTRICT FY 1991/92
REVISED ASSESSMENT FIGURES
$30,263
$104,993 $109,176
$135,256 $109,176
$42,650
$288,000 $291,685
$4,800 $4,800
$335,450 $296,485
Huh rora1 $47n 7nF
i$J_n.UUU ,jr ir, nn f.
($16,500) ($16,500)
$419,206 $354,161