HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1990 0117 CC REG ITEM 09A MOORPARK ITEM
•
PAUL W. LAWRASON,Jr. ,PK °<< STEVEN KUENY
Mayor 0o�Akv City Manager
SCOTT MONTGOMERY ��v CHERYL J. KANE
Mayor Pro Tern r"40%1A4 City Attorney
ELOISE BROWN �`�;.�; PATRICK RICHARDS,A.I,C.P.
Councilmember o e Director of
CLINT HARPER, Ph.D. o� ,e Community Development
Councilmember "'Eo J�` R. DENNIS DELZEIT
BERNARDO M. PEREZ City Engineer
Councilmember JOHN V. GILLESPIE
LILLIAN KELLERMAN Chief of Police
City Clerk RICHARD T. HARE
City Treasurer
MEMO R .ANDUM
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community Development
DATE: January 3, 1.990 (CC meeting of 1-17-90)
SUBJECT: DP-348 MAJOR MODIFICATION NO. 1 (A TO Z SELF-STORAGE)
Aac_k raund
The applicant, A to Z Self-Storage, requests approval to modify the
Development Permit Plan No. 348 currently a 47,400 sq.ft. self-storage
facility in. order to allow for the outdoor storage of recreational
vehicles, and for a rental business of U-Haul trucks and trailers to be
stored within the existing parking ste1:Ls on the subject property. The
applicant also proposes to conduct complementary service and sale
activities related to self-storage an:1 the proposed outdoor parking of
trucks an recreational. vehicles. In addition, the applicant requests to
extend both the hours of operation and the workdays to include Sundays. On
December 4, 1989, the Planning Commission held a public hearing for the
proposed Major Modification No. 1 pertaining to the applicant's request, as
mentioned above. On a vote of. 5-0, the Planning Commission recommended to
the City Council that the applicant's proposals be denied. On December. 20,
1989, the Planning Commission adopted a resolution recommending denial of
the project without prejudice. The attached staff report of December 4,
1989 discusses the project issues (Attachment 1) .
Discussion
The Planning Commission's primary reason for recommending denial without
prejudice was the concern. that the proposed modifications would be
significantly detrimental to the peace, safety, health, welfare and quality
of life of the people residing in the immediate vicinity of the project
site. Land use, parking, on-site traffic circulation, noise, safety, and
aesthetic and visual impacts on adjacent single family residences, and
commercial properties were the issues discussed in reviewing the
appropriateness of the proposals for the M-1 Zoning District.
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529-6864
i , Page
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community Development
DATE: January 3, 1990 (CC meeting of. 1-17-90)
SUBJECT: DP-348 MAJOR MODIFICATION NO. 1 (A TO Z SELF-STORAGE)
Page -2-
The issue that was extensively discussed at the planning Commission public
hearing was the parking/internal circulation pattern. The Commissioners
were concerned that the outside storage of U-Haul trucks and trailers and
recreational vehicles would completely encroach upon the existing parking
spaces which are required for the self-storage facility. The inadequate
parking spaces for such vehicles would encourage parking in areas which
would exacerbate the on-site circulation patterns. Since the beginning of
1989, the Code Enforcement Officer and the Planning staff, have on numerous
occasions, noticed the illegal parking of U-Haul trucks and trailers along
the back and the west side of the northerly building, blocking the two-way
traffic of the 25 foot driveway which is heavily used and shared by the
adjacent commercial properties to the north and west of the project site.
Despite numerous attempts by the City to rectify the situation, the
applicant continued to violate conditions no. 30 and 31 of DP-348 which
specifically prohibits parking of recreational vehicles and rental U-Haul
trucks on the subject property. There was also concern that the parking of
these vehicles would interfere with emergency access. Moreover, the
parking of the 14 to 26 foot U-Haul trucks and recreational vehicles would
generate traffic hazards, cause stacking of cars and maneuvering problems
because of the length of the vehicles and the less than adequate size of
some of the parking stalls.
Another issue that was discussed at the hearing was noise. The movement of
nine trucks and 35 recreational vehicles (though not necessarily all at the
same time) would generate noise levels that would be disruptive to the
noise-sensitive residential homes along the eastern property line of the
project site, particularly during Sunday operations.
Aesthetic impacts on adjacent properties was another source of concern
expressed during the public hearing. The existing walls and landscaping
do not represent an effective visual buffer for the adjoining single family
residences, located 20 feet from the east property line and for those
residences across Los Angeles Avenue to the south. Because of the nature
of the wall construction (open wrought-iron fence with pilasters) along the
street frontage, the storage of trucks and vehicles would be easily seen
from Los Angeles Avenue. In addition, any outside storage along the west
side of the building would be open to view from the major arterial street
until the adjoining parcel to the south west of the site is developed.
Page 3
TO: The Honorable City Council.
FROM: Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community Development
DATE: January 3, 1990 (CC meeting of 1-17-90)
SUBJECT: DP-348 MAJOR MODIFICATION NO. 1 (A TO Z SELF-STORAGE)
Page -3-
Finally, the nature and scale of the landscape materials would not he
appropriate to the site with the proposed use. The existing plants are not
dense enough to provide a visual enclosure and screen against the potential
visual clutter and blight that would be generated if large trucks and
vehicles are parked outside the buildings.
In conclusion, because of the impacts previously discussed at the hearing
and the failure to justify the required findings, staff recommends denial
of Major Modification No. 1. However, staff would recommend approval of
Minor Modification No. 3 to allow the installation of one public telephone,
a vending machine and the sale of packaging materials, which are directly
related to the self-storage operation.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED
On December 26, 1989, the applicant, A to Z Self-Storage, wrote a letter to
Mr. Paul Lawrason, the City Mayor requesting some changes to the original
requests (Major Modification No. 1 to Development Plan Permit No. 348). The
summary of his letter was to delete and modify some of the original
proposals, as well as adding new ones. The Summary Sheet shown below
illustrates the applicant's original and new proposals according to the
above letter.
ORIGINAL PROPOSAL CURRENT PROPOSAL
Items Withdrawn
- Outdoor storage of recreational - Outdoor storage of recreational
vehicles. vehicles.
- Rental business of U-Haul trucks - Rental business of U-Haul trucks
and trailers. and trailers.
- Sale of packaging materials. - Rental of mail boxes.
- Rental of copy/fax equipment. - Installation of propane gas
- Rental of mailboxes. filling station.
- Installation of public telephone,
vending machines and propane gas Request per letter of 12/26L89
filling station.
- Extended hours of operation - Delete the Surety Performance
during weekdays and Saturdays Bond.
from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and - Tnstallation of copy/fax
Sundays from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. equipment.
- Sale of packaging materials.
- Referral of U-Haul trucks.
- Sunday operation (see attachment
7, page 2)
MMEMMEMMOMMM
Page 4
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community Development
DATE: January 3, 1990 (CC meeting of 1-17-90)
SUBJECT: DP-348 MAJOR MODIFICATION NO. 1 (A TO Z SELF-STORAGE)
Page -4-
In evaluating the new changes to the original major modifications, staff is
concerned that the new proposals would still adversely affect the peace,
safety, welfare, health, and quality of life of people residing and working
in the immediate vicinity of the project site. While the applicant's
withdrawal of the proposed outside storage of recreational vehicles and
U-Haul trucks would lessen some adverse impacts on the adjacent properties,
his new request to establish a broker-referral service onsite for U-Haul
trucks may result in the same environmental and land use impacts that his
original modifications would generate (although substantially less).
Staff considers the broker-referral service for U-Haul trucks inappropriate
for the M-1 zone because it is a commercial use not consistent with the
intent and purpose of the industrial designated zone which does not allow
it. It is neither a principally permitted use or accessory use. Moreover,
this use is not considered auxiliary to the principal use of self-storage.
As mentioned in the staff report (attachment 1, page 4), only those minor
services which are related directly to the principally permitted use of
self-storage, such as sale of packaging materials and the installation of
vending machines and public telephones would be permitted.
Staff believes that proposed broker-referral service for U-Haul trucks
proposed by the applicant would only stimulate demand for the use of U-Haul
trucks by the clientele of the A-Z Self Storage facility. Although there
would not be a long term storage of U-Haul truck on the site, the increase
use of these trucks by the clientele even, on a short-term basis, would
generate heavy truck movements to and from the site therefore resulting in
traffic congestion and hazards onsite. The size and nature of the site are
just not suited to accommodate the expanded business ventures as proposed
by the applicant.
The heavy movement of trucks and the proposed extended hours of operation
to include Sunday would aggravate the noise problem. The noise levels
would be particularly disruptive to the nearby residents on Sundays.
In relation to the applicant's proposal to rescind the Surety Performance
Bond as part of the conditions of approval, staff strongly recommends that
the City Council deny the request. Based on a long history of
non-compliance by the applicant (refer to attachment 6) and the enforcement
problems that the City had encountered, it is imperative that the City keep
this condition to ensure compliance with all the conditions of approval if
the modifications are approved.
GAUL W. LAWRASON, Jr.
Mayor
SCOTT MONTGOMERY
Mayor Pro Tern
ELOISE BROWN
Councilmember
CLINT HARPER, Ph.D.
Councilmember
BERNARDO M. PEREZ
Councilmember
LILLIAN KELLERMAN
City Clerk
TO:
FROM
DATE
MOORPARK
OPO Piµ moo`' \
M E M-0 A N 1) t M
The Honorable City Counci
Patrick J. Richards, Dire '.or of (:ommunity
January 3, 1990 (CC meeti ,,, 90)
ITEM-iJk
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J.KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
RICHARD T. HARE
City Treasurer
Development
SUBJECT: DP -348 MAJOR MODIFICATION ',�0 I (,1 TO Z SELF- STORAGE)
Back -round
The applicant, A to Z Self -St.or
ate, requests approval to modify
the
Development Permit Plan No. 3413
irrcio ly a 47,400 sq.ft. self- storage
M E M-0 A N 1) t M
The Honorable City Counci
Patrick J. Richards, Dire '.or of (:ommunity
January 3, 1990 (CC meeti ,,, 90)
ITEM-iJk
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J.KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
RICHARD T. HARE
City Treasurer
Development
SUBJECT: DP -348 MAJOR MODIFICATION ',�0 I (,1 TO Z SELF- STORAGE)
Back -round
Discussion
The Planning Commission's primary
prejudice was the concern that
significantly detrimental to the In
Of life of the people residing it
site. Land use, parking, on -site
aesthetic and visual impacts cn
commercial properties were th(
appropriateness of th,� proposals I
�nsor )] recommending denial without
h proposed modif [cat: ions would be
e safety, health, welfare and quality
01(- mmodiate. vicinity of the project
of "i irculation, noise, safety, and
j<<r ol[t s Ingle family residences, and
i:'s,r discussed in reviewing the
t 7ouing, District..
799 Moorpark Avenue MoorparH California 93021 (805) 529 -6864
The applicant, A to Z Self -St.or
ate, requests approval to modify
the
Development Permit Plan No. 3413
irrcio ly a 47,400 sq.ft. self- storage
facility in order to allow for
the titdoor storage of recreational
vehicles, and for a rental busini�
) t,- lfaul. trucks and trailers to
be
stored within the existing park_irir ;,
sr;tis on the subject property.
The
applicant also proposes to cer,
,c,. omplementary service and sale
activities related to self-storali
trucks an recreational vehicles.
an tko proposed outdoor pairki_ng
a aditiorr, the applicant requests
of
to
extend both the hours of operatioi
,d h— wrrkdays to i TIC l.ude Sundays.
On
December 4, 1989, the Planning G,
i :s i(:n hold a publ sic hearing For
the
proposed Major Modification No. 1
to riin1; to the app] icant's requ(sst,
as
mentioned above. On a vote of ')-!
t;i Planning Commission recommended
to
the City Council that the applic:t:rr
1). era =>;s be den.icd. On December
20,
1989, the Planning Commission ar''c
(i r evolution recommending denial
of
the project without prejudice.
t t;< Id ,gaff report of Decembr�_.r
4,
1989 discusses the project issue
t o lin,r >> I ) .
Discussion
The Planning Commission's primary
prejudice was the concern that
significantly detrimental to the In
Of life of the people residing it
site. Land use, parking, on -site
aesthetic and visual impacts cn
commercial properties were th(
appropriateness of th,� proposals I
�nsor )] recommending denial without
h proposed modif [cat: ions would be
e safety, health, welfare and quality
01(- mmodiate. vicinity of the project
of "i irculation, noise, safety, and
j<<r ol[t s Ingle family residences, and
i:'s,r discussed in reviewing the
t 7ouing, District..
799 Moorpark Avenue MoorparH California 93021 (805) 529 -6864
Page 2
TO: The Honorable City Counci
FROM: Patrick J. Richards, Dire o >mmunity Development
DATE: January 3, 1990 (CC meeti _ -90)
SUBJECT: DP -348 MAJOR MODTFICATIC4 0 r Ik K SETY- STORAGE)
Page -2-
The issue that was extensively dint
5sol it
the planning Commission public_
hearing was the parking /internal
r(nIaLF
n pattern. The Commissioners
were concerned that the outside st
a.g( J
40aul trucks and trailers and
recreational vehicles would comple
ly orict
)ach upon the existing parking
spaces which are required for tho
eif -4to
age facility. The inadequate
parking spaces for such vehicles
iui( on,,)urage
parking in areas which
would exacerbate the on -site circ&
tiot patterns.
Since the beginning of
1989, the Code Enforcement Officer
nd 1he Planning
staff, have on numerous
occasions, noticed the illegal pay!
rig )I P
Haul trucks and trailers along
the back and the west side of the
r+trvl�
building, blocking the two -way
traffic of the 25 foot driveway
..,
eavily used and shared by the
adjacent commercial properties to
o 14
-ind west of the project site.
Despite numerous attempts by tK
7 i t
rectify ihe situation, the
applicant continued i,o violate : � , r
i t i Ii,;
io. 30 and 31 of DP -348 which
specifically prohibits parking of
'c',a
CHI vehicles and rental U -haul
trucks on the subject property. 1h
e ;�q P�so
concern that the parking of
these vehicles would Untprferc A
h �wv,4ency
access. Moreover, the
parking of the 14 to 26 foot U -liar
t i K v
end recreational vehicles would
generate traffic hazards, cause s,
k ,
irs and maneuvering problems
because of the length of the volt
4
ho less thin adequate size of
some of the parking stalls.
Another issue that was discussed N
its• bruting
was noise. The movement of
nine trucks and 35 recreational veh
1,,, th)ugh
not necessarily all at the
same time) would generate noise
jel tl
it would he disruptive to the
noise- sensitive residential homes
on) 5
Pastern property line of the
project site, particularly during, �
1c �.
-Q ions.
Aesthetic impacts on adjacent pi
expressed during the public Win
do not represent an effective visc
residences, located 20 feet f1m
residences across Los Angeles Avp
of the wall construction (open wrc�
street frontage, the storage of
from Los Angeles Avet,un. In adW
side of the building would be naf,
until the adjoining pircel to 0-
�r' e as another source of concern
FW - x,isting walls and landscaping
hi, Yi the adjoining single family
i� Property "ne and for those
, t'nth. Rer:ause of thn nature
L � Prce with pilasters) along the
K r, Y vehir:les wc,uld be easily seen
FT' ; -v ) "tside storage along the west
,, i w f —m the major arterial street
L n. , f the s i tr is developed.
Page 3
TL: The Honorable City Courc
FROM: Patrick J. Richards, Dire, ni & C mmunity %volopment
DATE: January 3, 1990 (CC meet _v of I I -qo)
SUBJECT: DP -348 MAJOR MODI71CATION I 1 W 7, SELF- S'T'ORAGE)
Page -3-
Finally, the nature and scale of h( lrindscape materials would not be
appropriate to the site with the pi(,nsoA pis, The existing plants are not
dense enough to provide a visual on( nsn— and screen against the potential
visual clutter and blight that we ld 1w _otforated i_f Large trucks and
vehicles are parked outside the In inga
In conclusion, because of the impn(
q provi"usly
discussed at the hearing
and the failure to justify
the reclr
rod r indings,
staff recommends denial
of Major Modification No.
1. Howe
or, <oaff would
recommend approval of
Minor Modification No. 3 to
allow .l,
i orillat: ion
of one public telephone,
a vending machine and the
sale "f
cyry; qy materials,
which are directly
related to the .self- storage
operr
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVI,[
On December 26, 1989, the applicrn;
Mr. Paul Lawrason, the City Mayo-
requests (Major Modification No. 1
summary of his letter was to 1
proposals, as well as adding now
illustrates the applicants orit,i
above letter.
ORIGINAL PROPOSAL
- Outdoor storage of recreational
vehicles.
- Rental business of U -Haul trucks.
and trailers.
- Sale of packaging materials.
- Rental of copy /fax equipment..
- Rental of mailboxes.
- Installation of public telephone
vending machines and propane gas:
filling station.
- Extended hours of operation
during weekdays and Saturdays
from 6:00 a.m. to t0:00 p.m. and
Sundays from 10:00 a.m. Lo 4:0C i
A t) : -elf- Storage, wrote a letter to
qu- stingy; some changes to the original
DenoWpment Plan Permit No. 348). The
to rr,ci modify some of the original
C4 710 Summary Sheet shown below
-I r, w proposals, according to the
:I iRRA NT PROPOSAL
te.m- Withdrawn
Outdoor storage of recreational
' e., isles.
h'e° to l business of U -Haul trucks
in trailers.
yo tal of mail boxes.
st illat ion of propane gas
l ,g qtnt.iol.
Zogn,st. per letter of 12/26/89
11e'lety the Surety Performance
ho d
n-t.allation of copy /fax
-q i pmvn t .
;,a Of packaging materials.
P Y rnl of U -haul trucks.
u -Inv operation (see attachment
mo 1 )
TO: The Honorable City Coun(i
FROM: Patrick J. Richards, Di7- o Community Development
DATE: January 3, 1990 (CC meeti I , i - 7-ct0)
SUBJECT: DP -348 MAJOR MODIFICATN 4 ' r It -0 'I. SETY- I'ORAGE)
Page -4-
In evaluating the new changes to W
concerned that the new proposals
safety, welfare, health, and qualit
in the immediate vicinity of 1o,
withdrawal of the proposed outsid.
U -Haul trucks would lessen some acv,
his new request to establish a hr
trucks may result in the same oni i
original modifications would genera
Paqe 4
or ginal major modifications, staff is
0d tit 11 adversely affect the peace,
of V, of people residing and working
Oro [4 t s i to While the applicant's
st )rngc of recreational vehicles and
so Apial s on the adjacent properties,
e-) fr,rtnI service onsite for U -Haul
nrnr,t r 6 rnd land use impacts that his
^hainh substantially less).
Staff considers the broker- referr:fil ter-ho for U -Haul trucks inappropriate
for the M -1 zone because it is ornor,.im "e not consistent with the
intent and purpose of the induc t r i V,n, g ,a r ed zone which does not allow
it. It is neither a principally to nV oo i n or accessory use. Moreover,
this use is not considered auxi 5 If rho principal use of self- storage
As mentioned in the staff report t ` "mw t 1, page 4 1 , only those minor
services which are related diroc° k, principally permitted use of
self-storage, such as sale of pick ;Kk Tnterials and the installation of
vending machines and aublic telopi n s w 1, he permitted.
Staff believes that proposed ])r;,
proposed by the applicant would oi'i
trucks by the of ientole of the A. '
would not be a long term storage
use of these trucks by the clier'
generate heavy truck movements t„
traffic congestion and hazards onr-
just not suited to accommodate tl
by the applicant
r rntrt 11 service for U -Haul trucks
s', mpl ttu demand for the use of U -Haul
Wk ':,rage facility. Although there
I Ion, T "nk on the site, the increase
e % "I cyi i short -term basis, would
! 5"m ho site therefore resulting in
The ; ze and nature of the site are
+rl 0 ,pis i ness vont tires as proposed
The heavy movement of trucks and t -Pn0 vd extended hours of operation
to include Sunday would aggrnvat }r , , v problem. The noise levels
would be particularly disruptive , h i in residents on Sundays.
In relation to the applicant's pr , as r rescind the Surety Performance
Bond as part of the conditions of p cYr', 41riff strongly recommends that
the City Council deny the roq, qt lased on rt long history of
non - compliance by the applicant (r -r a ,vvhment 6) and the enforcement
problems that the City had encourl- A ; imperative that the City keep
this condition to ensure complK n � � 1 he conditions of approval if
the modifications are approved.
Page 5
TO: The Honorable City Counc.
FROM: Patrick J. Richards, D r -� of t C"mmunit.y Development
DATE: January 3, 1990 (CC meet (t 1-1 -90)
SUBJECT: DP -348 MAJOR MODIFICAT'14 0 1 1 TJ Z SELF- STORAGE)
Page -5-
Staff concludes that
although the :
o1ase-i
>usiness
venture would satisfy
the economic needs
of the Commuij
y the
project
site with its close
proximity to single
family, residot
an i.
iat suitable for the type of
business proposed by
the applicant
As(d oi
the issues
mentioned above and
the failure to meet
the requiro(I
indings,
staff,
therefore, recommends
denial of the applicant's current n(
Pi
Staff Recommended Action
1. Review and consider the infcrrit(r i the Negative Declaration and
Mitigation reporting and Mon k f ky I rF_ram.
2. Make the appropriate findings art"! c page 10 of the staff report).
3. Direct staff to prepare a Y oil I:oil denying the requested Major
Modification No. 1 and approv r Milo- 4odificaiton No. 3 for adoption
at the City Council's next mo-, "p t F- hrnary 7, 1990.
Attachments:
1. Staff Report dated December 4,
Negative Declaration /Mitigati"i
2. Planning Commission Resolutioi
3. Conditions of approval for Mier
4. Amended Conditions of appro%a
applicant.
5. Site Plan
6. Letters of Notice of Violatio
7. Letter dated 12/26/89 to MaNin
989 (in(ludes Tniti_al Study, Mitigated
Rep )rt ir,g Program).
Mnliiirat: ions No. 3
n )Y 3' R as proposed by the
is 14 "n
"i, , MOORPARK STEM 7___,1
ELOISE BROWN
Mayor
BERNARDO M. PEREZ
Mayor Pro Tern
CLINT HARPER, Ph. D.
Councilmember
PAUL LAWRASON
Councilmember
SCOTT MONTGOMERY
Councilmember
RICHARD T. HARE
City Treasurer
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J. KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
City ')
4O( I -pal K
C\
onur i 95 '.. )n
Crq�.
..v�E
jLY
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J. KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
E. STAFF CONTACT: F'. APPLICANT:
1Jinnie Wilson A to 7. Self Storage
Associate Planner 8619 Reseda Blvd., Suite 7"'306
Northridge, CA 91324
G. PEOPOSF.D PROJE(7r:
The proposal is to modify the Indu
allow for the outdoor storagct <
business of transportation vehic.lr
and displayed within the existing;
of the project site. The app
c --teplementary servicr� and sale a,
self- storage operations and the pr
storage. These activities in( 11A
boxes; sales of packaging materd,
public telephones, vending mach:i
addition, for the convenience cf
applicant proposes to extend
Saturdays from 6:00 n.m. to 10
Finally, the applicant reque:o s
condition of the Development P,
financial ohlignt: ions in case of ,I
of the approved coed tt ions for i)'
delete, or add is git,en in Exhil i
cri.:1 Planned Devel,?pment Permit (DP -34f.) to
recre<3t Tonal vehicles, and for a rc!ntai
((J • Ilan' trucks and tr. ni lers) , to be s' ared
,arkiny tolls along the. east and JAIest e:i.des
is al.t I +Iso requests approval to cond)1cf:
=vit ic.s >lrich are auxiliary to the exis Ling
(:door truck and recreational vehicle
l�c r: rntal of copying equipment and mail
:tl7cf iieral mer.chnrdise; installation of
I , ropane gas filling stn ti.ou. 1-13
is of the self- storage facility, th'r
of ope- ration during, weekdays nud
;r,, ondnys from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m_
t�nwrill the liability clause (a standard
No. 348) in order to tednce hi:;
I roceerlings against tit(,, City. A list
4t ,n I 11 the appl i cnnt proposes to modify,
ATTAC, N M E NT T
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark California 93021 (805) 529 -6864
City ')
4O( I -pal K
Planning
onur i 95 '.. )n
Staff
'ep( rt
Decernbo
4 138 f•
SECTION I - GENERAL 1 NFt)RMATION
A. HEARING DATE:
B.
ITEARING TIME:
December 4, 1989
7:00 p.m.
C. LOCATION:
D.
CASE NO.: Development I'laTt
799 Moorpark Avenue
No. 348 Major Modification
Moorpark, CA 93021
No. l
E. STAFF CONTACT: F'. APPLICANT:
1Jinnie Wilson A to 7. Self Storage
Associate Planner 8619 Reseda Blvd., Suite 7"'306
Northridge, CA 91324
G. PEOPOSF.D PROJE(7r:
The proposal is to modify the Indu
allow for the outdoor storagct <
business of transportation vehic.lr
and displayed within the existing;
of the project site. The app
c --teplementary servicr� and sale a,
self- storage operations and the pr
storage. These activities in( 11A
boxes; sales of packaging materd,
public telephones, vending mach:i
addition, for the convenience cf
applicant proposes to extend
Saturdays from 6:00 n.m. to 10
Finally, the applicant reque:o s
condition of the Development P,
financial ohlignt: ions in case of ,I
of the approved coed tt ions for i)'
delete, or add is git,en in Exhil i
cri.:1 Planned Devel,?pment Permit (DP -34f.) to
recre<3t Tonal vehicles, and for a rc!ntai
((J • Ilan' trucks and tr. ni lers) , to be s' ared
,arkiny tolls along the. east and JAIest e:i.des
is al.t I +Iso requests approval to cond)1cf:
=vit ic.s >lrich are auxiliary to the exis Ling
(:door truck and recreational vehicle
l�c r: rntal of copying equipment and mail
:tl7cf iieral mer.chnrdise; installation of
I , ropane gas filling stn ti.ou. 1-13
is of the self- storage facility, th'r
of ope- ration during, weekdays nud
;r,, ondnys from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m_
t�nwrill the liability clause (a standard
No. 348) in order to tednce hi:;
I roceerlings against tit(,, City. A list
4t ,n I 11 the appl i cnnt proposes to modify,
ATTAC, N M E NT T
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark California 93021 (805) 529 -6864
DP -348 Major Modification
Applicant-
Date:
11. PROJECT LOCATI( N:
Major Mod. #1
A to Z Self Storage
December 4, 1989
Page --2-
The project site is locate(l i t!r O, )s Angeles Avenue, approximately 210
feet east of Goldman Averiuf an( 3llroximately 90 feet west of Shasta
Avenue. The Assessor Parcel 11— "11- 015 -13, -14, and -15.
a j...
aES T
POIND TER SUB
LOCATION
FREMON T ? _
I. APPLICATION DEEMED COMPLETE::
October 28, 1989
J. REQUESTED ACTION AND STAFF REU )"ENDATI ON:
1.
Open the public hearing
d ar.c('.I`P public
testimony.
2.
Review and consider
0o rnation
in the Mitigated Negative
Declaration.
3.
Review and consider %h
mitigation
measures and monitoring
program.
4.
Make the appropriate fin(
igs.
5.
Direct staff to prepay
:) res(,lution
recommending denial of the
requested major modifi.ca!
on for Adoption
at the Planning Commission's
meeting of December 4, 1
-,9„ and approval
of Minor Modification No. 3
to allow the installati(
cif ,)no public
telephone a vending machine
and the sale of packa�in
ma?f,:i.+ }s which
aro considered accessory to
the principal use of
K. ALTERNATE PLANNTNG COMMISS'B10N 'ACTIONS:
1. Recommend approval ttI( Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Reporting imi ton tor,rig Program, and conditional approval
of the requested major i +*.i(n.
A. SITE. ZONING:
SECTION ' - PRO.IE('I' SITE, BACKGROUND
M- 1 dust r it Park District
B. SITE GENERAL PLAN: I 1 41 t 1-1(11 stria l
DP -348 Major Modification
7
Major Mod. #1
Applicant:
A to Z Self Storage
Date:
December 4, 1989
Page -3-
C_ VICINITY
ZONING
North:
M -1
Industrii
P ask 1)
;t rice
South:
R -1 -13
One FamiI
Ro!i den
�_ial 113,000 sq.ft. minimum lot size)
East:
R -1 -18
One Fami1
Rosidonti.al
(18,000 sq.ft. minimum lot size)
West:
M -1
Industri ,'i
P ii lc I)
t vict
D. VICINITY
GENERAL
PLAN:
North:
I -'
Light In&
st al
South:
ML
Medium Lo.
Dernsitv
Residential
East:
ML
Medium Lo.
Deaisit,:
Residential
West:
I - 1
Light Ind
•; t � t 1
E. PROJECT SITE HISTORY:
On February 2, 1987 the fanning Commission adopted Resolution No.
PC-87 -127 approving a 47,400 sq.ft. ;elf storage building on a 1.4 acre
site along Los Angeles Aver. (e,
Avenue. On September 8, 1'87,
Modification No. 1 to allok he
four as originally approved Or(
approved Minor Modification
gallon size trees along t`re s'.
box trees as specified.
F. EXISTING SETTING:
The project is bordered tc
buildings. To the southwest
Goldman Avenue and Los Angel(
parcel. Single family resid
periphery of the project �A t(
line. In addition, there are
Avenue, which fronts the pro
existing development inc. 1((
buildings, 482 sq.ft. eacil
along the eastern property
facility. A 9 foot concret
boundary of the site, whit,
fronts the south property P
landscaping, which includ,s
landscape strip-;,, comprise,,
approximately 210 feet east of Goldman
the Planning Commission approved Minor
( on:_ruction of two buildings instead of
['elr>iiiary 6, 1989, the Planning Commission
(llow the substitution of fifteen (15)
-(-)perty tint in lieu of the nine 24"
hf, north and north -we f by the industrial
th «� pr-;)ject site, at(ii1q,))northeast corner of
Avenue is an undeveloped, vacant 0.64 acre
(CO!— (but_ the project site along the eastern
approxiviately 20 feet from the side property
;ir71;1r tmily residences south of Los Angeles
)c.t s ! t( t o the south. On the project site,
(!s tw( completed two -story self- storage
i ? > t. high with parking stalls located
TI ( Grief along the west side of the storage
;, h i I is constructed along the eastern
t f c) t. wrought -iron fence with pilasters
ai j,tc, tit.. to Los Angeles Avenue. Existing
'o(l landscaped planter and two 3 foot
SE(71' ')N I I ANALYSIS
As previously stated, the prop() d nodiiications would involve the outdoor
storage of recreational and - e( 1 r�tn�portation vehicles on the existing
parking spaces. The modificaticjl d L ;o include the operation of service
related activities incidental 1,,. cl - storage facility and the proposed
outdoor storage Use ;ucil as tht i i 0ri; esluil nent and mail boxes;
DP -348 Major Modification Major Mod. #1
Applicant: A to Z Self Storage
Date: December 4, 1989
Page -4-
sales of packaging materials and
telephones, vending machines, and
the appropriateness of the proposa
must analyze the issues of tT
aesthetic /visual considerations;
family residences and the immediit
1. Land Use:
The applicant contends teat
vehicles and transportation
part of the self- storage fac
the Industrial Park District.
within the zone. Staff does
storage of such vehicles i -s
of self - storage. Moreover, t
purpose of the M -1 Distric:.,t„
principally permitted uses,
uses. The outdoor storage c
only permitted in the comme
(C -1); General Commercial 0;
and is subject to a condiv
development permit. Thc, c.
conditionally permitted on9
(1� -E); Limited Industrial D!i:
on the rear yards and on a or
;ertc r,il merchandise; installation of public
propar,,� gas filling station. In reviewing
icr- the M -1 Zoning District, planning staff
I:; (I ?nd its parking/circulation onsite;
iffic Ild noise impacts on adjacent single
1 cods; and safety hazards.
since :,hi- outside storage of recreational
«ahi<<I(, s a natural outgrowth and integral
ity wlu..h is the principal use permitted in
ine tP1 -:1, the proposed use should be allowed
o* agri� with this contention. The outside
it r:onsidered auxiliary to the principal use
is -asc! s not consistent with the-in - tent and.
which not allow it either as on of the
acccsr,ory uses or conditionally permitted
trlick.s and trailers for rental purposes is
irr such as Neighborhood Commercial
'; anci "commercial Planned Development (CPD);
anal ur ;r+ permit process in addition to a
,door of recreational vehicles is
i��rcr'1 Agriculture (R -A); Rural Exclusive
ric `'1 21; provided the vehicles are placed
m W t< - rage. urea of one acre..
Outside storage of vehicles src:h as those proposed by the applicant was
specifically prohibited by
'.he PlT,nning Commission as part of the
conditions of approval of Se
ember
187. In relation to the applicant's
request t.o conduct minor sere
e coma .�ile
activities, they are permitted in
the zone only if they are
rvic(is
related directly to the principally
permitted use of self -star
,e fac
lit..y such as sales of packaging
materials, installation c.i
lmW is
'.elephone (only one allowed), and
vending machines. Those usi
,;ucl v;
mail box rental, and the proposed
propane gas filling star.[(
Nloic:
provides service appropriate to
recreational vehicles would
rercre
n)t be permitted. Moreover, storage
of propane is not permit t.+
it in`
industrial zones under any permit
process. Those uses which
e cii e,tily
related to the principal use of
self - storage, such as tho;
i ; °,
above, can be processed as a minor
modification to the Itrdust.r:.
Ilinno
Development Permit No. 348. If the
minor modification is appr ,v.
s.• ' 1 e
Tanning Commission, the applicant is
conditioned to file a Sun,t °;
n f< ! -mr
rce Bond n the amount of $10,000 to
ensure compliance of cond ! i
:rliibit 2 for Conditions of Approval
for Minor "codification No
DP -348 Major Modificati:c 1 Major Mod. #1
Applicant:: A to Z Self Storage
Date: December 4, 1989
Page -5-
2_ Parking /Internal Circulal ion
The storage of big trucks, til r. rnd recreational vehicles as proposed
by the applicant on the ox , ink; p rr„ Lng stalls would remove not only the
parking spaces required fc) ili- ;,1f- storage facility but would also
interfere with the onsite c.:r ila.ic,n patterns. The applicant has provided
40 parking spaces for the et* ;e while 39 spaces are required.
With only one extra parking ice available the parking site will certainly
not be able to accommodate L °') recreational vehicles, 4 van trucks, 5
trailer and two (transit) vier tr.rcks as proposed without complete
encroachment upon the existi;,,, park.ir); stalls. Even if not all the tracks
or recreational vehicles are t.or,�d,'p.rked at the same time, there will not
be adequate parking stalls r most. employees, customers and visitors to
the main facility. The grog, y inadeluate parking areas for such vehicles
may encourage their stor3go it ate: which would exacerbate the onsite
circulation patterns. l.`, 1S1:11 J1, staff, on two separate field
inspections, has noticed tlr. , it egal parallel parking of several U -Haul
trucks along the back of tk � y building, which tends to block the
two -way traffic flows of t h, r � ,,eway.
The complementary service r ;,ii - ctivities proposed by the applicant
would require a loading zoi < },,, , �i up for delivery trucks. However,
there is no space in the br3r ya r l t nccommodate such a facility without
encroaching onto the 25 fco1 7 o 'rw c•.
In view of the extra length
(which range between 12 feet
18 foot compact stalls on ti
too small in size to acccrnrc,c
that the 18 foot alleyway al
enough only for one -way t_a
of 25 feet as required b,,
project is approved, the Cit
to full width (25 feet) t
circulation.
The parking of the 14 foot t,
20 foot parking stalls on 1.1
traffic hazards. Even with
difficult for such vehicles
turn without sideswiping h
movements of heavy trucks i
in addition to the normal
would create traffic congest
is shared and heavily used
north and west of the srt,
narrow parking aisle would (t
the internal traffic flows
for a seliaration of the hr rr,
the trrnsportation and recreational. vehicles
2') feet), staff concludes that the existing
w, t s le of the building would certainly be
=ate ;ucl vehicles. Moreover, staff believes
g tl< western half of the site would be wide
Is �, it does not meet the minimum width
�rtrct� Code for emergency access. If the
sh-auid condition the applicant to construct
I in order to ease onsite traffic
20 r -orrt recreational vehicles on the existing
�as_r,iie of the buildings would still create
re :t- in,lard 25 foot aisle width, it would be
e negotiate a 24 foot minimum radius
f the adjoining building. The regular
r., 1 --a ional vehicles to and from the site,
�,rl,rated by the self - storage facility,
)c!t ic-rrlarly on the 25 foot alleyway which
lo, a 1 )dining commercial properties to the
F r,, l rck ing out >f heavy trucks onto the
e ,trr:k ng of cars and thereby interfere with
hr t:rc r c;f the site does not appear to allow
r r r,i :ucments and that. of the cars,
DP -348 Major Modification Ni I Major Mod. #1
Applicant: A to Z Self Storage
Date: December 4, 1989
Page -6 --
3. Aesthetic/Visual Impacts
It is good zoning practice 1(
establishing adequate interfac
walls and landscaping that ex
visual buffer for the adjoinin
Avenue to the south. Because
wrought -iron fence with pilas,
of recreational. vehicles along
be seen easily from Los Angel
U -Haul trucks and trailers al
open to view from the major 'r
the southwest of the project s
block wall along the east pt -c
visual blight that would be .?
outside. If the project is al
wall, instead of the existir
along the entire street stotrig,
While landscaping occupies 1?
landscaping materials are not
The type and nature of shrubs
dense or mature enough to pn(c
lack visual interest in te:r -m
soften the appearance of the
3 foot landscape strips shot
substantial hedges and walls
from the adjacent street ind
Interior landscaping in thc> l
provide adequate visual f,
Unfortunately, the existing;
accommodate the 24" box trees.
planters along the west sidro
being overexposed to the heat .
overhang of parked cars. "he
major street (Los Angeles Av
with denser foliage than the
the above recommendations c31
the conditions of apprrval
4. Traffic
The increased traffic that sacs,
may have an adverse impact
has not been fully widened t,c
fully improved at this point.
applicant is conditioned .o
meandering sidewalk, add iti
landscaping and irrigation
has complalted the widening
reconc,i e existing discordant land uses by
<In,ong .onflicting uses and functions. The
,t on t'rie site cio not present an effective
si.ngle family residences across Los Angeles
i, the nature of the wall construction (open
'I's) along; the street frontage, the storage
t:hc� east side of the storage buildings would
I Avenue. Moreover, any outside storage of
rig t::he west side of the building would be
erial street until the adjoining parcel, to
t.e s developed. The presence of the 9 foot
ert,� line would not lessen the clutter and
ated if large tracks and vehicle are stored
proved, =t six foot solid, decorative masonry
WT c >ctghr.- iron fence should be conditioned
cif the site, the scale and nature of the
appropriate to the site and /or structure.
ud };roundcover that exist on the site is not
de a visual enclosure and screening. They
of t:vpe and spacing of plants and fail to
ill buildings structures. The shrubs in the
)c };rc;uped more densely together to form
They should be able to screen parked cars
ninimiz( the impact of large paved areas.
rk i;rg areas should include trees that will
losuro and shading when they mature.
or,t .indscape strips are not wide enough to
`he plants in the narrow 3 foot landscape
)f t lie storage buildings are in danger of
xhaust ,f automobiles because of the 2 foot
anc's(aping of the 30 foot planter along the
QUO) �h(��uld also include larger size trees
istink, Tees. If this project is approved,
;uhsc,w-, )? shon' I be incorporated as part of
1 b,� ge- 'erated by the proposed modifications
Los Angeles Avenue, a major arterial which
n 94 foot right of way and not been
in time If the project is approved, the
rovidc -ull street improvements (including
isi my ing, curb, gutter, tree wells,
,ms) ]�-,ng Los Angeles Avenue after the City
!c kti street.
. 7
DP -348 Major Modification, `sic. Major Mod. #1
Applicant: A to Z Self Storage
Date: December 4, 1989
Page -6-
3. Aesthetic /Visual Impact
It is good zoning practice o reconcile existing discordant land uses by
establishing adequate interfeG,.es among conflicting uses and functions. The
walls and landscaping that exist on the site do not present an effective
visual buffer for the adjoining single family residences (located 20 feet
from the east property line), grad the single family residences across Los
Angeles Avenue to the south Because of the nature of the wall
construction (open wrought. -ron fence with pilasters) along the street
frontage, the storage of recreational vehicles along the east side of the
storage buildings would be seen easily from Los Angeles Avenue. Moreover,
any outside storage of U -Hau'. trucks and trailers along the west side of
the building would be open tc view from the major arterial street until the
adjoining parcel, to the southwest: of the project site is developed. The
presence of the 9 foot block wall along the east property line would not
lessen the clutter and visua blight that would be created if large trucks
and vehicles are stored outsi_de., If the project is approved, a six foot
solid, decorative masonry wa 1, instead of the existing wrought -iron fence
should be conditioned along ° e cnt:ir,� street storage.
While landscaping occupies f;% of the site, the scale and nature of the
landscaping materials are no!_ appropriate to the site and /or structure.
The type and nature of shrubs and, groundcover that exist on the site is not
dense or mature enough to provide a visual enclosure and screening. They
lack visual interest in t.ern::; of type and spacing of plants and fail to
soften the appearance of the call buildings structures. The shrubs in the
3 foot landscape strips should be grouped more densely together to form
substantial hedges and walls They should be able to screen parked cars
from the adjacent street ui,' minimize the impact of large paved areas.
Interior landscaping in thrt parking areas should .include trees that will
provide adequate visual Ttclosure. and shading when they mature.
Unfortunately, the existing f)ot: landscape strips are not wide enough to
accommodate the 24" box trve:. The plants in the narrow 3 foot landscape
planters along the west ;;ids, ()f the storage buildings are in danger of
being overexposed to the heat exhaust of automobiles because of the 2 foot
overhang of parked cars. The landscaping of the 30 foot planter along the
major street (Los Angeles A,.,�nue) should also include larger size trees
with denser foliage than tli.! �xLst.ing 1::rees.. If this project is approved,
the above recommendations c :I aiidsc npirig, should he incorporated as part. of
the conditions of approva
4. Traffic
The increased traffic that. wco;ld be generated by the proposed modifications
may have an adverse impact c r, Los Angeles Avenue, a major arterial which
has not been fully widened t. c: an liltiniate 94 foot right of way and not been
fully improved at this point in time. If the project is approved, the
applicant: is conditioned to provide full street improvements (including
meandering sidewalk, adcht )nnl. paving, curt >, gutter, tree wells,
landscaping and irrigation :;y tem! ;,) along Los Angeles Avenue after the City
has completed the wideninjt r 1 thy,, ttri�,rfal street
DP -348 Major ModificatiCtl Major Mod. #1
Applicant: A to Z Self Storage
Date: December 4, 1.989
Page -7-
5. Noise
Movement of 9 trucks and 3'> r�
rr,at i +)r,i I vehicles (though not necessary
all
at the same time) would geti•
at F, iFo ;e which would adversely impact
the
adjoining single family rw
!en .es. The proposed extended hours
of
operation, if approved by t:l
P -inning Commission, would exacerbate
the
,noise problems. The noise 1
els would be particularly disruptive to
the
..noise- sensitive residential h
mes if the applicant is permitted to extend
both their hours of operati(
: aril O.e workdays to include Sunday.
The
screening provided by the exi
ting walls and landscaping is not adequate
to
attenuate the noise that wool,
be gen¢,rated by the additional activity
and
the extended hours If t!
=y free "fit, :t is approved, the applicant
is
conditioned to reduce the pos
r_ble Bern „rs of operation to occur between
8:00
a.m. to 8:00 p.m. and to e�xc:l
ale operation..
6. Safety
Because of the highly inflammrble and hazardous nature of propane gas, the
installation of a propane ga filing station is heavily regulated by the
County Uniform Fire Code. 'I'h. loc.at. bm of a propane gas filling station in
relation to setback requi.rem s i t s w i l l depend on the size and capacity of
the tanks. As mentioned reviously, the storage of propane is not
permitted in M -1 or any othe in,liist�ial zones. Moreover, staff strongly
feels that the proposed tip >e n the inject property would jeopardize, or
endanger the safety and g� erai w I fare of persons residing in the
adjoining residential propr� irli, If the proposed modifications are
approved, the applicant ;011di1iOned to meet all the pertinent
regulations of the Uniform re Coder relating to location, setbacks and
capacity of the filling st::at >n. Fn -ther, the handling of the hazardous
gas shall require the filing i ^.tni >rm Fire Code Permit and an Emergency
Hazardous Materials Bus 1n— 1'l, pursuant to Chapter 6.95 of the
California Health and Safr -tN Id”
7_ Liability Clause
The applicant requests to nrr� rid ch(�
standard conditions of appr -vaI )r
Permit (DP) 348. In order- c pr< vrr
the liability condition wis bail I -d
condition of permit approve+' wlre i r I
Therefore, staff strongly rrv+ ;in, i
be permitted.
inbility clause which is one of the
the Industrial Planned Development
the City from expensive litigations,
by the City Attorney as a standard
City incorporated on July 1, 1983.
uo no amendment on this legal clause
SFCTION IV - CONFOk4ANCI: WITH H THE GENERAL PLAN
The requested major modili rt';rt considered inconsistent with the
following Goals and Pol.ici( , t�i4, f,,id Use Element of the General Plan:
DP -348 Major Modification Major Mod. #1
Applicant: A to Z Self Storage
Date: December 4, 1989
Page -8-
Goal 3 To minimize air, ws r v igyA , and noise pollution by
indusnrial uses.
wiscussion: As pro ously discussed, the existing block wall and
landscaping are in,iequatQ is visual and noise buffers against
the visually disrup vo proy)sed uses.
Goal 8 To provide for vise tmenit.i_es along major roads to make them
attractive as well -cn er.iont to the people of Moorpark.
Discussion: The Cl U01 anc visual blight that would result from
the proposed modii at ions would be seen from a major road and
therefore would 3eg Me the street scenic view corridor.
Policy 6 To establish sites
which are harmon:ioc
degrade the genera!
Discussion: The
blight and advers
residential prep,,
discordant uses,
)r appropriate industrial uses in locations
with adjoining land uses, and which do not
0vs i s a environment of Moorpark.
olu;sed modifications would generate visual
icise and traffic impacts on adjoining
C4 ,; hoot adequate interfaces between
SECTION V ENV 00 MENTAL DOCUMENTS
Review of pertinent envi_c
proposal, if approved, may hr
measures have been added to
to a level of insignificance
mitigation measures are at:ta�
included as conditions of
Reporting and Monitoring Pro
Declaration and must be aciot,
Assembly Bill No. 3180.
mental documents has disclosed that the
e adverse environmental impacts. Mitigation
ie proposal which would reduce these impacts
A. discussion of these potential impacts and
ec. P- ,posed mitigation measures have been
rcjoc. n)proval.. A proposed Mitigations
am i n ncluded with the Mitigated Negative
-d )r of to project approval to comply with
Assembly Bill No. 3180 was a opted by the State Legislature in 1988. To
summarize, this new law regii er; a l cal agency to adopt a reporting and
monitoring program in con' ict o, with the adoption of a Negative
Declaration or in conjuncts vitl a adoption of the findings for an
Environmental Impact Repor.
SECT' ioN vi AGENCY REVIEW
Agencies and Departments whi
reviewed
Major Modification No.
1 include
the County Fire
Departmen
;ounty
Sheriff s Department,
Caltrans
District7, County
Environme
a. Heath
Department, and Air
Pollution
Control District,
Staff Ian
included the
proposed conditions
generated
through the agency
review aq
uc i t ior, >f
project approval.
DP -348 Major Modification
Applicant:
Date:
SECTION VF
That the Planning Commission
considered at the next regu i rig
that the City Council deny M
findings cannot be made, and
installation of one public.
packaging materials which 3r
self - storage.
It Major Mod. #1
A to Z Self Storage
December 4, 1989
Page - -9-
- STAFF" RECOMMENDATION
staff to draft a resolution to be
me. st ir,k; of December 18, 1989, recommending
o Mad i f i.cat ion No. 1 because the required
pprovo "1 [nor Modification No. 3 to allow the
epiioiw, a vending machine, and the sale of
ori< ido? ,c{ ac,.�essory to the principal use of
SECT �N Vlll EXHIBITS
1. Findings
2. Conditions of approval. ft
3. Mitigated Negative Decl -i
Program.
4. Initial Study
5. Environmental Evaluation
6. Amended Conditions of Ap.
applicant.
7: Site Plan
8. Letters of Notice of s'i
Prepared by:
G�GtiUric,QJ W � (1l'��
Winnie Wilson
Associate Plriner
November 29, 1989
Date
Minor Modification No. 3.
Lions 3rc41 Mitigation Reporting and Monitoring
enci "litigation Measures.
oval fc DP -348 as proposed by the
C:. o r.
Approved by:
P,3 trio ichards
% ?)_rectd,v of Community Development
DP -348 Major Modificaticii ! Major Mod. #1
Applicant: A to Z Self Storage
Date: December 4, 1989
Page - -10-
RECOMMENDED FINDINGS - DP 348 MAJOR MODIFICATION NO. 1
1. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR MAJOR MODIFICATION NO. 1
a. The Mitigated Negative i) 1rraticii / Initial Study is complete and has
been prepared in compl.ias a_e wit.h the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) Guidelines .:r rite I ,1 icy.
b. The contents of the 11is gated t4k>gative Declaration / Initial Study
have '_:een considered ?n e decisions on this project.
c. In order to
reduce ad,,•rse im:acts of the proposed project, all
mitigation measures disc
;secs in
the environmental document have been
incorporated
into the pr,
os( d iii
)ject
d. A Mitigation
Reporting
rid 11oni-oring
Program has been prepared in
compliance with Assembi}
Rill '�c
3180 and considered :in the various
decisions on
this projec
2. MAJOR MODIFICATION NO. 1
a. The proposed modificatic :s would riot be consistent with the purpose.
intent, guidelines, stare nrd:;, pclicies, and provisions of the City's
General Plan and Chapter 1 laid :° of the Ordinance Code.
b. The proposed modificatio , would impair the integrity and character of
the zone in which it is �c it d
C. The proposed modificati ,is would not be compatible with land uses
permitted within the Gei ral Plari Land Use designations and the zone
in the general area whc i t'i( :s i s to be located.
d. The proposed modificatic would )e detrimental to the health, safety,
peace, comfort and wolf e cf th persons residing or working in the
surrounding areas.
e. The proposed modificatic w>uid be obnoxious, harmful and impair the
utility of the propert} so f aril neighboring property.
f. The existing site is riot
the proposed modific:at
landscaping and other
Ordinance or as is otho
with uses in the sure oi,
idoquato i,n size and shape to accommodate all
ris. 1:: iell as parking, walls, screening,
del,ipme t, features prescribed in the Zoning
r eci i r. red in order to integrate said use
11 ;; !r(,
1.
DP -348 Major Modification Major. Mod. #1
Applicant! A to Z Self Storage
Date: December 4, 1989
Page - -12-
MITIGATION MEASURES AND
REPORTING AND MONITORING PROGRAM
NOISE:
Mitigation: Prior to issu nce -f a zoning clearance the following
mitigations shall be adopted
a. Reduce hours of operatio to occur between 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. and
to exclude Sunday operat n�
b. Replace the existing ,,arse shrubs and trees by a more dense
landscaping buffer ^e+ di,'O tiorl of the Director of Community
Development.
C. Replace the existing rought -:ron fence with a solid masonry
decorative wall along tli. street. _rontage.
d. All roof noise generatio: sources onsite shall be attenuated to 55 dBA
at the property line, c; to the ambient noise level at the property
line measured at the r iie of tfe occupancy request. Prior to the
issuance of a zoning clearance fog initial occupancy or any subsequent
tenant occupancy, the P ,ector :,f Community Development may request
that a noise study b� submitted for review and approval which
demonstrates that all nsiti- 2oise generation sources would be
mitigated to the require le.,(, The noise study must be prepared by
a licensed acoustical (,r, n,�< r it �;c.cordance with accepted engineering
standards.
Reporting and Monitoring:
For mitigation conditions b, c, art, d, it revised landscape plan, a wall plan and
a noise study shall be submitted the Department of Community Development for
review and approval prior to zonint clearance. The Code Enforcement Officer for
the City would be responsible fo *. lie monitoring of Condition No. a. Monitoring
will only occur if a complaint i re:eived regarding the hours of operations
which are in violation of that al- ,rovo�d by the Planning Commission. The Code
Enforcement Officer will provide w ittinn notice of violation as required. If a
second violation notice is requ:ir( , t',w owrier of the property will be required
to pay a penalty fee equaling c'. ibl> t:ho cost to the City for enforcement
activities beginning with the ini t1 nsperct: ion. The City will place a lien on
the property if the fee is not I iid mid there is continued violation of the
outdoor repair work restriction. e Community Development Department will also
have the option of scheduling L ru ?) i hearing before the City Council and
requesting re�,ocatlort of the p1� -rn i i( :� 1omment permit .
DP -348 Major Modification o
Applicant:
Date:
2. LIGHT AND GLARE:
Major Mod. #1
A to Z Self Storage
December 4, 1989
Page -13-
Mitigation - Prior to issuance cf i Zonini, Clearance, a lighting plan shall be
prepared by an electrical engi.nt_F regis'.:ered in the State of California and
submitted to the Department of (,c; r;mtanity Ilevelopment for review and approval.
The lighting plan shall achieve; .e following objectives: Avoid interference
with reasonable use of adjoining ropertiess; minimize onsite and offsite glare;
provide adequate onsite lighting; limit electroliers height to avoid excessive
illumination; and provide struc:tt <s wit l are compatible with the total design
of the proposed facility.
The lighting plan shall include tl fol l- ,wing:
a. A photometiric plan sho„ing sa point -by -point foot candle layout to
extend a minimum of t- - - -nty (2-) feet outside the property lines.
Layout plan to be based t 11 =_(,n ;10) foot grid center.
b. Maximum overall height , fictur-s shall be fourteen (14) feet.
C. Fixtures must possess ,I3rp (;ut off qualities with a maximum of one
foot: candle illuminat i_(i it )r,)p rty lines.
d. Average maximum of or.(, t A :ar,d 1 e illumination.
e.' There shall be no more hui a ,even -to -one (7:1) ratio of level of
illumination shown (max ins ,)minimum ratio between light standards).
f. Energy efficient light ag fi.xLure.s shall be provided which are
compatible with adjarou,
g. No light shall be emitt , `io 90 degree or horizontal plane.
Reporting and Monitoring - icri to issuance of a Zoning Clearance, the
Director of Community devel ,,merit shall review and approve the required
lighting plan. The staff pl; cr ;hall document this approval in the file.
3. CIRCULATION:
Mitigation:
a. Full improvements and t w.,deni,ig of Los Angeles Avenue which would
be c::arried out by both ^ '-ttv A the developer.
b. After the City has comi oted ',ho widening of Los Angeles Avenue, the
applicant shall provi<ic ill r,trc-et improvements (meandering sidewalk,
paving, curb, gutter, ee welI , landscape and irrigation systems)
along Los Angeles Avenuf ;ri It, ;fate Highway right -of -way.
DP -348 Major Modificaticn
Applicant:
Date:
Reporting and Monitoring:
Major Mod. #1
A to Z Self Storage
December 4, 1989 .
Page - -14-
The applicant shall submit to tai, City c Moorpark for review and approval,
street improvement plans prepared v <w K(-,�,istered Civil Engineer; shall enter
into an agreement with the City o Moorpark to complete the improvements; and
shall post sufficient surety guarw Soh in; the construction of the improvements.
Prior to issuance of a zoning c "' €kdranc:e, else staff planner shall contact the
City Engineer's Office to determi - comp] ante with this condition and shall
document compliance by placing -i o it tl,� )i-ojPct file.
4. HUMAN HEALTH:
Prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance, the proposed installation of the
propane gas station shall be revi -wed by the County Fire Department to ensure
that the proposal would comply with all the applicable state and local
regulations related to storage, ha, ilin?, r,rd placement of propane gas.
The handling of propane shall c quire 3 Uniform Fire Code Permit and an
Emergency Hazardous Materials Br. -iness plan must he filed with the Fire
Protection District pursuant to (-Ii - to t,c- (3°- the California Health and Safety
Code.
Reporting and Monitoring:
The applicant shall be required tc, ;rovide written documentation from the County
Fire Department that they have r— eked an-i approved the proposed use prior to
the issuance of a zoning clearanc�-
5. AESTHETIC /VISUAL IMPACTS
Mitigation:_
a. Construction of a 6 foot solid masonry wall along street frontage to
replace the existing wrc,1 ,ht - i r,)r fence.
b. Replace existing landscii in tlic 30 foot planters with larger, denser
and more mature trees n,i,. ;l rich;
Reporting and Monitoring:
The City's Building Inspector ,i.s esponsihle for the compliance of condition
(a.) and the City's landscape 1! 1 ite t responsible for the compliance of
condition (b.)
CITY C,, F FP.�Fil_
INITIAL ST' I:'' iTJ KLi:, i' FORM
I. BACKGROUND
1.
Name of
Applicant A tc_ ',
Se .. f S'�orage , LTD
Majer
'od_:..fic ition to the
47,400 sq. ft.
2.
Project
Description self-
orage `-acility, (2
individual build-
ings)
The proposal in --1 l-
ies out lour storage
of recreation< 1
and transportation vehi,.lt
(rtd c�)eration of
complementary service
and sale
activities.
3.
Date of
Checklist submittal
4.
Project
Location On Los rL_,ge�_es
\venue between
Shasta Avenue
and G,- ] .f
;ar. AvF 'iue .
II. ENVIRONMENTtU IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "rav �n:wers are required on attached sheets.)
YES MAYBE NO
I. EARTH. Will the proposal resin i�t:
a. Unstable earth conditions iii chat�,;es
in geologic substructure:;" —
b. Disruptions, displacements, oral act:_ >n or
overcovering of the soil?
C. Change in topography or fir;, d urfc c ✓
relief features? —
d. The destruction, coverin m�,c'.ific ttion of
any unique geologic or p,iy- 3 fear ties? —
e. Any increase in wind or aat.
either on or off the site
f. Changes in deposition or
or changes in situation, dr.
which may modify the chain(,
stream or the bed of the
inlet or lake:'
'iosi( i of soils, .�
si -cn of beach sands,
,si t ion )r erosion
o a r.. -,er or
n t_ r it bay,
g. Exposure of people or propt_, y to gc ,logic _✓
hazards such as earthquake:; Lirdsl des, mud-
slides, grounci failure, tr m.lrti t tz,3rds?
EXHIBIT_ -�_
YES MAYBE NO
2. AIR.
Will the proposal resul
a.
Substantial air emissions o
eterjor. ti.on
of ambient air duality?
b.
The creation of objection 3b':
o0cu ?
C.
Alteration of air movement,
- isture. >r
temperature, or any change i
c_imatc either
locally or regionally?
V/
d.
Is there a potential for cum
ative aIverse
impacts on air quality in t..;
przjecl area?
3. WATER. Will the proposal resul'
n
a.
Changes in currents, or the
Durse of direction
of water movements, in eitLo
marine )r fresh
waters?
b.
Changes in absorption rates,
lra.nage patterns,
or the rate and amount of su
ace runoff?
c.
.Alterations to the course i
)w f flood
waters?
d.
Change in the amount of suit
e wat e! in
any water body?
e.
Discharge into surface water
, or in any
alteration of surface water
ual Ky, including
but not limited to temperatt
•, liss heed oxygen
or turbidity?
f.
Alteration of the direct:,_or
r- rite f flow of
�
ground waters ''
'�
g.
Change in the quantity of k,
Yund waters, either
through direct additions or
ithdraw�ls, or
through interception of An
uif?r b, cuts
or excavationA?
h.
Degradation K ground ware
Uality?
i.
Substantial reduction in th.
amount of water
otherwise available for au'�
- gat er supplies?
j.
Exposure of people or propp
y to water related
hazard:; such as flooding o
0.1 W; ,<s?
4.
PLANT LIFE. Will the propoSLl.
!A1 1'-- n
a. Changes in thlr. diversity o:
pecics .r number of
any species oL plants (ii.c h
in }, t:-e, s, shrubs,
grass, :rops, and aqu,
,Ic ,
b. Reduction of the numbers :7
nN it iq; e, rare or
endangered species of pL ne
C, . Introduction of new spec..e:>
t plant:, into an area,
or in a barrier to the nor;n,
ieplen_shment of
existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of .in,:
gricultltral crop?
5.
ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal
esult 1;I:
a. Change in the diversity of
ec.ies o, numbers of
any species of animals (bi.r
, land .animals
including reptiles, fish 31
shell f j :11, benthic
organisms or i.nsects)?
b. Restrict the range of or ot_.'
rwiser feet any
,rare or endangered anima i
C. Introduction of new specie,
f z.nimaLs into an
area, or result in a barrig
t,9 the iiigration
or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to existing) `.
h cr W- idlife
habitai ?
6.
NOISE. Will_ the proposal resul
i:I:
a. Increases in existing noi:: +:
eve l:;?
b. Exposure of people to sever
n o_ :,+, _'_ vels"?
7.
LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the prop
a`a proii ice new
light or glare?
8.
LAND USE. Will the proposal i c
Jl is ,, substantial
alteration of the present or 1,1
n- o an i use of an
area?
9.
NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the pr
70;;.1 r�� -iii 7 t in:
a. Increase in the rate of u: ,
if .in; i;iturai
resource:,?
b. Substantl.al depletion o:
n ):il , 11 wlLble_
resou rr• e?
YES MAYBE
NO
10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the prop(
a. A risk of an explosion or t;.
substances (including, but
pesticides, chemicals or !il
of an accident or upset c-iii
11. POPULATION. Will the proposes
distribution, density or grow "i
population of an area?
12. HOUSING. Will the proposal a:f,r
or create a demand for additic)n i
13. TRANSPORTATION /CIRCULATION. Ii'
in:
v.;l.c
rcl�; se of hazardou!
to, oil,
ton) is the event
c1 ocation,
he human
xistcg housing,
hc•usin�
tc l,rc osal result
a. Generation of substantial :i,i• t::cnrcl ,ehicular
movement?
b. Effects on existing parking cill.tie; or demand
for new parking?
C. Substantial impact upon exi nk; trap portation
systems?
d. Alterations to present patte° s cf c3r-culation or
movement: of people and /or go s
e. Alterations to waterborne, L cx a_: - traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards mct:or ehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians:'
14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the propo .1 gave In effect
upon, or result in a need for ne or altcred
governmental servies in any (c oc irip, areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?:
C. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreation it ic i`' i+ i
e. Other governmental servic.
15. ENERGY. Will the proposal re >u ; ii
a. Use of substantial amount : f 10 1 o 011er}ly?
YES MAYBE NO
_V
tZ
b. Substantial increase in ceru�
of energy or require the di,.
of energy?
16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal
systems, or substantial alter.j
utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications system?
C. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal"
1 (,)on xisting sources
tcpnent )f new sources .
ul t for new
following
YES MAYBE NO
t✓
J
g. Street lighting annexation
d /cr i.r:)rovements?
17.
HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposa
rcEn t n:
i; or historic-
a. Creation of any health hazy
car pot ntial health
hazard (excluding mental. he
tl)"
b. Result in destruction or r:l
b. Exposure of people to poten
a; hea] Al., hazards?
18.
AESTHETICS. Will the proposal
stilt ii, the obstruc-
thin the
tion of any scenic vista or vie•
open to the public,
or will the proposal result in
de c rc>at Lon of an
aesthetically offensive site c p
3° c i�uls l i c view?
19.
RECREATION. Will the proposal
�su?t in r_irn impact
,)A a known
upon the quality or quantity of
xi: tini recreational
si i ' n
opportunities?
20.
ARCHAEOLOGI CAL/III STORICA-L. G, i
t it )rt+ )osal:
YES MAYBE NO
t✓
J
a. Affect possible unknown air
ie�)
i; or historic-
al sites?
b. Result in destruction or r:l
.>r it i,,R
>f a known
archaeological or histor J (,,
_; i e w ;
thin the
vicinity of the project'
C. Result in destruction or :31
�ra icon
,)A a known
_✓
archaeological or hi stoi
si i ' n
ill the
vicinity of the project'
IV. DETERMINATION.
On the basis of thif, initial evl! Et on:
In conformance with Sectionl5060
certainity that the proposal wo+el,I
environment.
I find the proposed project is c
I find the proposed project CW1,I)
environment, there will not be a
the mitigation measures descried
to the project. A 11ITIGATED NEC",
the St,ite EIR Guidelines, I find with
,)i hivc a significant impact on the
exempt pursuant to class
hav( a significant effect on the
sgnifcnnt effect in this case because
n 'In attaclied sheet could be applied
Vi- D! f;1 %pij'rI0,N SHO[ILD 8F. PREPARED.
YES MAYBE
NO
21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE..
a. Does the project have the paten
ai ta) (iegrade
the. quality of the environment,
;ub:,taly ially
reduce the habitat_ of a fish or
ai.l llif species,
cause a fish or wildlife popula
ion to„rop
below self - -sustaining levels, t
r.-ea _er:
eliminate a. plant or animal cc-
,ini _y, educe
the number or restrict the ran,
of ,i r �r• or
endangered plant: Or animal cr �
imi tat e i_.,nlaortant
/
examples of the major per:io(! :'
history or prehistory?
-- - — - --
b . Does the project have the po't<°:
is I t o .,ch ieve
short -term, to the disadvanta >;,
of long, -term,
environmental goals? (A short
ein _'ml.ict on
the environment is one which o
urs_ n
relatively brief, definitivet i)
i0c of me
while long -term impacts will _>
u7 c into
the future.)
C. Does the project have impacts
,ic-L .ire individu-
ally limited, but_ cumulativel-;,
oxi:;i +i <>'; able?
(A .project may icapact on two
a r a t e
resources where impact on c.-s
relatively small, but where tI
< -' = ; =
of ect .:)f the
total of those impacts on thc�
.v i oiern� n° is
significant.)
- --
d. Doers the project have environr,
atal i�fIects
which will cause substantial .:
verse effects
./
on human beings, either dii-
r or gin' irectly.
III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVA:i,!t
LCN
IV. DETERMINATION.
On the basis of thif, initial evl! Et on:
In conformance with Sectionl5060
certainity that the proposal wo+el,I
environment.
I find the proposed project is c
I find the proposed project CW1,I)
environment, there will not be a
the mitigation measures descried
to the project. A 11ITIGATED NEC",
the St,ite EIR Guidelines, I find with
,)i hivc a significant impact on the
exempt pursuant to class
hav( a significant effect on the
sgnifcnnt effect in this case because
n 'In attaclied sheet could be applied
Vi- D! f;1 %pij'rI0,N SHO[ILD 8F. PREPARED.
r
I find the proposed project COULD 40T have a significant effect on
the environment , and a NTEGATIVF DI .I- A PAT I0'; should be prepared.
I find that aitaouglT the propo.,-etl
effect on the environment, the!(,
this case because the mitigation
sheet could be. applied to the PT-,,
SHOULD BE PREPARhD.
rc j c
?_? tioL
a_sures
(01,11d have a significant
le a significant effect in
sescribed on an attached
''I "rLGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
I find proposed project ;fAY have effect on the
environment, ,ind an ENVIRONMENTA1 `TA;T REPORT is required.
I find proposed project HAY ha%o A g 1i : is ant. effect on the
environment, and an ADDENDUM tc e.i;tini -ertified Environmental
Impact Report is required.
_ I find the proposed project MAY tT. e a _.igTtificant effect on the
environment, and this effect i_� t' quatcI3 addressed in a certified
Environmental Impact Report, and u: SUl3:';QUENT USE of the existing
EIR is required.
DP -348 Major Modificatio:�r Major Mod. #1
Applicant: A to Z Self Storage
Date: December 4, 1989
Page -15-
DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL, i`.VALUATTON AND MITIGATION MEASURES
1.a., b., c., and d. EARTH
No unstable earth conditions, s.il compaction, changes in topography or
geological substructures would res ,t l,y the proposal because the self storage
facility has already been built h r-sw.vl]-1t to the County Uniform Building Code
and the proposal does not involve 1n1,1 new construction of building structures
which would generate the impacts mf, , i -rrerl.
1. e., f., and g.
Based on the City's Safety Elemen
are known to exist on site or
significant effect is anticipated
2. a., b., c., and d. AIR
rc, Orsional, geologic or seismic hazards
the mmediate vicinity. Therefore, no
The proposed project is not expect A to re-sult in substantial deterioration of
the ambient air quality because o Trading of the site or construction of
buildings would be involved. Flee anticipated movement of trucks and
recreational vehicles to and frc the -i..te would not. generate enough air
emissions to degrade the ambient ,, c1111 t
3. a. through J. WATER
The proposal would not increase 1chc rat, and amount of surface runoff,,lower the
infiltration rate, change the drr;nagf! patterns or degrade the ground water
quality because the site has alrea,, been developed and the buildings have been
constructed in accordance with t.hc relevant. County Building /Engineering Codes.
The proposal would not involve ai,, new ((,)r,;truction, therefore, no significant
effect is anticipated.
4 & 5 PLANT AND ANIMAL LIFE
The proposed project would not (.I1nge thl, diversity and number of plant and
animal species or affect the wild fe Habitat because the site has already been
developed and is surrounded by ::rdi t.1 11 IT (I residential developments.
6. 1. NOISE
In general, commercial/ industr ia 's roi';e within the City of Moorpark is not
considered excessive. However, erc residential locations are adjacent to
industrial uses, as is true in tlii ca:;e, i significant impact may result. The
impact will be directly relate,i r only f,o the number of truck movements to
and from the project site but als th � 11rrie of day at which they occur. The
movement of 9 trucks and 35 ri,( !ational vehicles in and out of the site
(although not necessarily at the : -irne time coupled with the extended hours of
operations and the increased wci�d ,s (sce Exhibit 6 for work schedules) would
generate noise levels exceeding, 6 dR1 A ch is the maximum acceptable noise
level for residential homes.
EXHIBIT �_
DP -348 Major Modification Major Mod. #1
Applicant: A to Z Self Storage
Date: December 4, 1989
Page --16-
Mitigation
To mitigate this significant n :s(� impact on the adjoining residential
properties, the applicant is con itioneo to reduce the possible hours of
operation to occur between 8:00 a.m. anci 8:00 p.m. and to exclude Sunday
operation. In addition, to attent -ite noise more effectively, the applicant is
required to replace the existing par!,e shrubs and trees by a more dense and
mature landscaping buffer and tc.; r +place the existing wrought -iron fence with a
solid masonry decorative wall al( fig he ;treet frontage. In addition, all
noise generation sources onsite dill be attenuated to 55 dBA at the property
line, or to the ambient noise leve at the }property line measured at the time of
the occupancy or any subsequent t,nant o('rupancy. The Director of Community
Development may request that a noise s ',wady be submitted for review and approval
which demonstrates that all onsite noise generation sources would be mitigated
to the required level. The noise, stady musr.. he prepared by a licensed acoustical
engineer in accordance with accc�pt� ? c=nf;ineoring standards.
7. LIGHT AND GLARE
The proposal would generate new 'ght )r glare on the adjoining residential
neighborhood.
Mitigation
To mitigate this impact, the appii tnt. is r+�quired to shield all lighting onsite
and to design lighting so hat theri is no glare or adverse spillover of light on
the adjacent residential homes. F,c following requirement should be included as
a condition of approval for the p:yject. For all exterior lighting a lighting
plan shall be prepared by an ]Elc•.trical Engineer registered in the State of
California and submitted to the De artment: of Community Development for review
and approval. The lighting plan � all achieve the following objectives: Avoid
interference with reasonable use f adjoining properties; minimize onsite and
offsite glare; provide adequate ( ;sits lighting; limit electroliers height to
avoid excessive illumination; and ,)roe. ide structures which are compatible with
the total design of the propose,! f ili t.-,
The lighting plan shall include th fo &()w ig,:
a. A photometiric plan slu Ang a i,oint -by -point foot candle layout to
extend a minimum of tt, my (20) feet outside the property lines.
Layout plan to be base(- ; ,a 'OTI 10) foot grid center..
b. Maximum overall height fi:.tuc ; shall be fourteen (14) feet.
C. Fixtures must possess s +irp cut-off qualities with a maximum of one
foot, candle illumination at. ica-oporty lines.
d. Average maximum of one E )t (-.and hi illumination.
e. There shall be no more °hm H seven -to -one (7:1) ratio of level of
illumination shown (may; cm 'n minimum ratio between light standards).
DP -348 Major Modification i Major Mod-#1
Applicant: A to Z Self Storage
Date: December 4, 1989
Page - -17-
f. Energy efficient light g fixtires shall be provided which are
compatible with adjacen , . rcp��rt_ i, s
g. No light shall be emitt-r, d oae tfe 90 degree or horizontal plane.
8. LAND USE
The proposed project would not
undeveloped areas or increase the ci
proposed project is located in ar,
industrial and residential properi .
currently in place and no expansio
project. Therefore, no potential
9. NATURAL RESOURCES
encourage the development of presently
Pvelopment intensity in developed areas. The
area which is predominantly developed with
es. All public services and utilities are
to the infrastructure would result from the
gnif:cstit impact on land use is anticipated.
The proposed project is not expect +•d to result in a significant increase in the
rate of use of any natural resour,-, or result in substantial depletion of any
nonrenewable resource because the site has already been constructed and the
proposal does not involve any use enE >watle or nonrenewable resources.
10. RISK OF UPSET ( REFER TO No.- 1, -a. and b _ J
11. POPULATION
The proposed project is not ex1-•cted to significantly alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rite 3f the human population in Moorpark. The
proposal would be for outside sto age of '_rucks and recreational vehicles and
would not involve any residences -� sit+,
12. HOUSING
The proposed project would not r— ult in the displacement of people from the
existing site. The site is curren €'y Improved with a self storage facility with
no residences in existence or prop ;e,i
13. a. through f. CIRCULATION
The increased traffic that would 1� generated by the proposed modifications may
adversely impact on Los Angeles AN—nue. however, the full improvements and the
widening of Los Angeles Avenue wh..h would be carried out by both the City and
the developer would reduce this impact to a level of insignificance. The
proposed outdoor storage of 35 r( reational vehicles, 6 trucks, and S trailers
(though not all at the same time) would completely encroach on the existing 40
parking stalls. Since 39 stal l�, ire aequired for the site, and the applicant
has provided 40, there is only o:i- extra space remaining for the proposed uses.
The outdoor storage of these t.ru, -.s find recreational vehicles would therefore
seriously impinge on the parking equi,rement.s of the entire site and cannot be
mitigated if the proposed uses f T 4 1 pN> >- ) %, Q -
DP -348 Major Modification. o Major Mod. #1
Applicant: A to Z Self Storage
Date: December 4, 1989
Page -18-
Mitigation
To minimize traffic circulation
the existing alleyway (along th��
(25 feet).
14. a. through e. PUBLIC SERVICES
The proposed project would not,
protection personnel, and schools
to fire and police protection and
building permit for the existing
required for the proposed modifiC
park and recreation facilities
15. a. and b. ENERGY
-;it"( , t!ie applicant is required to construct
")ut,r "jc portion of the site) to full width
-quite additional fire protection or police
ire not expected to he affected. Fees related
ichool fees were paid prior to issuance of a
sell str!rage facility. No further fees are
'ions "he project is not expected to impact
The proposal is not expected to a substarrt:ial amounts of energy and would not
substantially increase demand up( er:ist:i -rg sources of energy or require the
development of new sources of r,ergy. As stated previously, there is an
existing self storage facility of ite and no new construction is proposed.
16. a. through g. UTILITIES
The proposed would not create nt., dc,mand for utilities which are already in
place to serve the existing sel,r . rn;e f- cility.
17. a. and b. HUMAN HEALTH
The proposed installation of Oih propano gas filling station would create
potentially safety hazards boil en3ite ind on the adjoining residential
properties.
Mitigation
To minimize these hazards, the apl icant i� conditioned to meet all the relevant
regulations of the Uniform Fire C< :e relating to location, setbacks and capacity
of the filling station. The handling c, the hazardous gas shall require a
Uniform Fire Code Permit and th r ail F:morgency hazardous Materials Business
Plan must be filed with the Fire l ote.tirr i)istrict pursuant to Chapter 6.95 of
the California Health and Safety c is
18. AESTHETICS /VISUAL IMPACTS
The outdoor storage of vehicles ,nd trnc ks would be visually disruptive and
aesthetically offensive to public iew frorr both Los Angeles Avenue, and Goldman
Avenue as well as from the adjeirl r is rl nrial homes because of the inadequate
landscape and wall buffers.
DP -348 Major Modification
Applicant:
Date:
Mitigation
Major Mod. #1
A to Z Self Storage
December 4, 1989
Page -19-
To mitigate this visual impact, t.k applicant is conditioned to construct a 6
foot solid masonry wall along tfi( entire street frontage and to replace the
existing plants with a more dense., nd I,iature landscaping enclosure.
19. RECREATION
The project would not be expected affect the quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities. (R(,.-,r t.c iiscussion on Item No. 14. Public
Services).
20. a. through c. ARCHAEOLOGICAL/ll(STORICAI.
There is a very low probability t.li it the Site has archaeological or historical
significance due to previous gradir. acuivities and existing development onsite.
21. MANDATORY FINDING OF SIGNIFICANCE
a. As identified in the pre�rrydi_ng responses, the project is not expected
to significantly degrade '.he duality of the biological and cultural
environments.
b. Both short term and loi :g term impacts in terms of noise, visual,
traffic, human health, ight and glare, may result but are not
expected to be signi -.cant if mitigation measures previously
identified are included ei conditions of project approval.
C. The proposal is expected
considered with other
vicinity of the site
Avenue, and the full.
required as part of th�
impacts to a level of i�i
o result in cumulative traffic impacts when
is t, present, and future projects in the
iowever, the future widening of Los Angeles
-ret�t improvements that the applicant is
conditions of approval would reduce these
gtr i f i c:ance
d. The project would have ei,,ironmental effects which would cause effects
on human beings either (i rect.ly or indirectly if the proposed propane
gas filling station i.,, i)ermitted onsite. However, the mitigation
measures which would be ciopteci is conditions of approval to minimize
the handling, and storag, of the hazardous chemical would reduce this
impact to a level of :n , in
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED 7113I 189th DECEMBER, 1981).
(Ji ir-nin presiding:
Jr, rn�W»znink
ATTEST:
Celia LaFleur, Secretary
891211B /C1iRONI PJR:DST:PP:WW:DR: 1:(°I:r_rl
DP -348 Major Modification Major Mod. #1
Applicant: A to Z Self Storage
Date: December 4, 1989
Page -11-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - DP -348 MINOR MODIFICATION NO. 3
1. Prior to issuance of a zoning
amount of $10,000 shall be f
Development. The Director of
hearing to be heard before t.
the funds in the Performance(
Conditions of Approval or foa
automatically be superseded t
condition compliance for ,T
Council.
lFiiran�a, a Surety Performance Bond in the
ed and accepted by the Director of Community
Community Development, may, through a public
City Council recommend that any or all of
Bored be forfeited for noncompliance of the
some other just cause. This condition shall
a relat..ed resolution or ordinance regarding
i t I IM'r! approvals as adopted by the City
2. Construct to full width tw,rnty-1.vi, (25) feet the alleyway along the
southwestern periphery of t1i(, it,, 'o sllow for two -way traffic.
i" i ACHMENT ___ -_.__
DESCRIPTION OF RE[1LJEST ( CON NUED ,` ROM PACE 1 ) :
The request for reviser and 'r mcldifyinq the c-= ,nditic.ns
DP -848 is gz.ven in the f-_..lI rQ norenclature :
The tDriginal text �_. f tree planned development condition tc. t
deleted is m a r k: e of f; ,- ..........
The new proposed tee" s sr awn in dark bc-ld letters typed
thus : notificatic-r a appropriate
A. CONDITION '21 :
That the
permittee agree•
as a ccnditic-n of issuance and use c
this permit
to dcfti- rid,- - art -I-rr�
- �o}t-e�xp�n�c;
ztrtp- �c+ron- brr+n4ltt- agnrn-
participate
in the defense
of the City
of any action because c
issuance C
or renewal ? a_.
this permit
or in the alternative t
relinquish
this permit. Pe,
nittee will reimburse the City
reasonable
and mutually agreed upon court
cost which the City may L
required by
c,_.,-trt to pay a
a result of
any such action. The Cit
- m ,--R-t- �t�-�r?i-e•-
dr�creti,�rr
will participate in the defense of sLrc
action, but
such participal
:cn sh.il.l not
relieve permittee of -hi
practicable
and reasonablE= -
i cati ri under
this cc,nditi-Dn.
P. REVISE CONDITION 28 AS FO _CVS:
The hours of operation s.h till be limited to
- - •MnncfRq -thy -r,!tq+,- FRi�ery, -_- ern„ �- F}- HA- zr: rtr:-- t,_r�;ciFr- p- m-- nR- Sat!rtrcit�� �h
ferci- 3- ±tq- �t,etl-- be- c-xcf- - r,- Sarrd��*: 6.00 a.m. to 10.00 p.m. Monda
through Saturday and 10.00 a.m. to 4.00 p.m. on Sunday. Th
1 automatic gate operati.or', shall be controlled by the resider
manager as necessary.
i
C. MODIFY CONDITION 330 AS FO _OWS:
-Pion- Outside storage of U -r,aul or similar rental equipment shall b
permitted. Four (4) Van tucks (upto 171), Five (5) trailers
(upto 121) and one or tw:, Van Trucks (upto 26') in transit May b
stored.
D. MODIFY CONDITION 81 AS F
-"- Storage
cIf
recreati-Di ,.1 vehicles shall be
permitted. Parkin
areas shall
be
posted wi+s, this notification as appropriate. Suc
storage will
be
in compli,ince with the following
conditions:
1. Number of Recreational vehicles stored shall not exceed 35.
2. Length of stored Vehi + -les shall not exceed 20 feet and heigh
shall not exceed sta.ndird Recreational Vehicle height of 14 ft
The turning radius fo- vehicle movement shall follow the Cit
code as applicable.
�- Continue. page � g
3. No repair or maintenance of the vehicle shall be permitter
within this storage facility.
4. Propane gas or other similar tanks in standard R.V. shall be
disconnected and shall oe secured to ensure no leakage occurs of
the premises. On situ manager shall verify and control the same.
5. Operation of the stored Recreational vehicle shall not bf
permitted for an e•Rtended periods except for periodi
maintenance.
6. Recreational Vehicle stored must carry comprehensive InsurancE
Coverage in effect duri. -,g the storage of the Vehicle.
7. Overnight sleeping or staying or living in the stored RV b,
anyone will be strictly prohibited.
8. Trees shall be planted to minimize view of parked R.V.vehicle!
from outside specific:al:,y -from L.A. Avenue ( High way 118 ).
E. Operators of the fac:ilyty have permission for the followinc
additional business activities on the this premises.
1.' To rent mail Boxes e,tc for- Public Use
2. To install Copying an- Fax machines for document reproductior
for public use
3. To sell packaging material such as cartons, boxes, adhesivE
tapes, staples etc... or sale to the public
4. To install vending machines for coffee, sandwiches, ice anc
cold beverages, candieRi and other snacks for the public use
5. To provide other services appropriate to R.V. Storage.. Such as
propane gas filling stition
G. To sell general merchandise such as souvenirs, stationary,
envelops, stamps etc. 'or patrons
7. To install Public Te-le - hones.
EXHIBIT _
DESCRIPTION OF REDDEST ( CONS -4LJED .F� OM PACE 1 )
The request fcIr rev isir 'o)I —rl I :' r mc,difying the condition= =f
DP - '348 is Given ir, the fol ),:,� "IC n, rn_ n 1a.t1_ire
C. The c =riginal text 1 p1,;�nned development condition to be
d e l e t e d is m a r- t- e d ._ , ,ra - ztn- + -r-+ -- 4 -, r --,Trr- ...... .
CA The new proposed te> : sh-_�wr. in dark: bald letters typed
thus : ncti fication as .:appropriate
A. CONDITION 21 :
That the permittee agrees as a c-_,nditic.n of issuance- and use of
this permit to d�fLL�d,- - -r,ss �s�3� -�xp�n��; ztrtp--�e-e�nn- brnn4hrt- agnrn�-
participate in the defense of the City of any action because rDI
issr_iance ( c-r renewal ? :1f thLS )ermit c.r in the alternative tc
relinquish this permit. Per ittee .:ill reimburse the City -+.-,i .a n%
reasonable and mutually agreed upon cc,urt cast which the City may b
required by coUrt to pay a- a res l t of any such action. The City
gill participate in the defense of suct
action, but such particip<at r :3tIa 1 not relieve permittee of hi-
practicable and reasonable _ i- t;)': 1 Under this r_c,nditic-n.
P. REVISE CONDITION 28 AS T"01 -)W�
The hc-r_irs ._.f _.peratic -n shy 1 be limited to n- 7rH8- p-m-,-
•MnRC�Cty- t�trn!�tt- F= R2cfcry;
6.00 a.m. to 10.00 p.m. Monday
through Saturday and 10.00 a.m. to 4.00 p.m. on Sunday. The
! automatic gate operation- shall be controlled by the resident
manager as necessary.
C. MODIFY CONDITION '30 AS FOt_ OWE.:
-H,n- Outside storage of U -haul or similar rental equipment shall be
permitted. Four (4) Van tricks (upto 17'), Five (5) trailers
(upto 121) and one or t,wc Van Trucks (upto 26') in transit May be
stored.
D. MODIFY CONDITION 3-1 AS FCC )t "" :
-hM Storage c If recreati.c.n.- . vehicles shall be permitted. Park:inc
areas shall be pc-sted wit this notification as appropriate. Sucr
storage will be in complialoce with the following conditions:
1. Number of Recreational lehi.cle<, stored shall not exceed 35.
2. Length of stored Vehicles shall not exceed 20 feet and height
shall not exceed sta.ndtir-d Recreational Vehicle height of 14 ft.
The turning radius for vehicle movement shall follow the City
code as applicable.
�- Continue. Page I 4
3. No repair or maintenance of the vehicle shall be permitted
within this storage faclity.
4. Propane gas or other similar tanks in standard R.V. shall be
disconnected and shall be secured to ensure no leakage occurs on
the premises. On site manager shall verify and control the same.
5. Operation of the stox-ed Recreational vehicle shall not be
permitted for an extended periods except for periodic
maintenance.
6. Recreational Vehicle stored must carry comprehensive Insurance
Coverage in effect during the storage of the Vehicle.
7. Overnight sleeping or staying or living in the stored RV by
anyone will be strictly arohibited.
8. Trees shall be planted to minimize view of parked R.V.vehicles
from outside specifical y from L.A. Avenue ( High way 118 ).
E. Operators of the facility have permission for the following
additional business activi!ies on the this premises.
1.'To rent mail Boxes etc for Public Use
2. To install Copying anc Fax machines for document reproduction
for public use
3. To sell packaging material such as cartons, boxes, adhesive
tapes, staples etc... `•:)r sale to the public
4. To install vending machines for coffee, sandwiches, ice and
cold beverages, candie and other snacks for the public use
5. To provide other services appropriate to R.V. Storage..Such as
propane gas filling st,:, tion
G. To sell general merc,iandise such as souvenirs, stationary,
envelops, stamps etc. ,7r patrons
7. To install Public Tele;t•iones.
MOORPARK
ELOISE BROWN
Mayor
BERNARDO M. PEREZ
Mayor Pro Tern
CLINT HARPER, Ph. D.
Councilmember
PAUL LAWRASON
Councilmember
SCOTT MONTGOMERY
Councilmember
RICHARD T. HARE
City Treasurer
Mr. Paul Maniar
8448 Reseda Blvd. #107
Northridge, CA 91321
I 9
'k'vemh,tr 22, 1989
Ref: A to Z Storage 5040 Go :man Avenue
Deer Mr. Maniar:
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J. KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.0
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
While on routine field inspection in your area on November 14, 1989,
Code Enforcement staff obsc!rved that you are storing /parking U -Haul
trucks (6) and trailers (2) >n the above addressed property. This is in
violation of your Developmer Plan P'(-rmit No. DP -348.
We are requesting your vo untary --ompliance by removing all U -Haul
trucks /trailers upon receip of this letter. If this matter is not
resolved, this office wil have -:o other alternative but to seek
whatever legal action needec !o gain compliance.
A field inspection will be � )nducted by this office, so as to determine
compliance after the above d e If vc)u have any questions, please call
me at 529 -6864.
Sincerely,
(1�z.
P k Mancino
Code Enforcement Officer
File No. 89 -0202
cc: Patrick J. Richards, Dirv= for of Community Development
Manager - A to Z Storage 5040 Goldman Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
ATTACHMENT �v
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021
_ (805) 529 -6864
890202 /CIIRONl P.1R: DST: PP: WW [)_ ° F'I: ["I' (( J
Mayor
BERNARDO M. PEREZ
Mayor Pro Tem
CLINT HARPER, Ph. D.
Councilmember
PAUL LAWRASON
Councilmember
SCOTT MONTGOMERY
Councilmember
RICHARD T. HARE
City Treasurer
ru
MOORPARK
Mr. Paul Maniar
8448 Reseda Blvd. #107
Northridge, CA 91321
�4 Ov
z — _
Iuly 19, 1989
�ertified Mail
Re: A to Z Storage, 5040 Goicl ian Avenue
Dear Mr. Maniar:
As stated in a number of letters from this office
hearing conducted by the Code Enforcement Officer, t
Department remains the same. If you park, or store
rental trailers /trucks or ic, reational vehicles on
are in violation of your Dev(, opment. ,'Ian Permit No.
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J. KANE
City Attomey
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.f
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
, and at an office
he position of this
any "U Haul" type
your property; you
PD 348.
The U Haul type rental trailer/trucks or recreational vehicles being
stored or parked on your prol,brty is not a permitted use, authorized by
Condition 31 on your DP -348. At the office hearing, although you did
not agree with staff's decis;)ns, you did agree to comply. As far as I
am concerned this matter is losed. If violations continues to occur
then this office will have o other alternative but to seek whatever
legal action necessary to ot; ain complirince. We will also initiate a
request for revocation of ycn Planned development: Permit.
If you should disagree with -y
decision it is
appealable
under Section
9.12.040, as an administratix
determanat. ion.
You have 15
days from the
date of receipt of this letto
to nppei'I. The
filing fee
is $432.00.
I would also like to remind ,;u that your temporary ground sign (A to Z
Storage) is in violation ar,(! ,st ho rmloved immediately upon receipt of
this letter.
Sincerely,
Patrick J. ficha ds Director o mmunity Developr nr
cc: Frank Mancino, Code Enfor.. ment Oif'icer
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorz) ark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6861C
cEnS /mfPr,JT T' I R l`(�T• tln • rrr. , ,1
r1!i`W!'j''�A:',��i:T1:1, l`t 1 iti. ..1•. r -) .l �1.,{ ���- t J•. .L 't i:..i ✓ i! i. jT !
4• ,mot: le.• + t
Cl S A.tr
If
• � r� )r /1 G,� �, ♦ 'a u , a : r • t Y 1 + -•t , ` ` h-+ .fin
•G r,r• t'.ly tp. hi ♦ .� �1, i. •I , r � .. t.. ... S �.
11 5 , •,ir >f 41.1 t. ` ^ F y r ' , .ry 1 r . t ! t }
y }t r ✓,NIr1 � f -t r�i• 1 Je:y 1 • „..r ♦ b :•: r.. r,' is •,J - '.,,•i 'L r (' 4,,r � t Y••;
7 4r 1r 1 +
PS Form 3800, June 1985
• ♦ 1' t ♦ It �+ IY �� r' 1 1 L wl
Y '
S YY y J
•� • � • r + 1t, i ' {t ,1 % f •r 7� r i,1.h%r %YI J 1a
> x
G• '' �r e i %� ti• ��vF ,.
�,�• ., • ' I �' + , A r•t ' w •�,� Ly,� G ,4�'ri�•Yi.
„y •..<..yr,. +4'4.4 ^I•r•.'A.w� 1 . �
Ln
I. q1'
, .rti.••„•�w'hl)r•M17^�•M"7;:#Y<' *.. t f r y' M r4 4 i
IMPRIP” Iry .. • . • St. -� t1 �7 4.; �1 .�>f�a `•'C J lJj��iF ix "1 J`f.'7'y G.yy
— • • • 11 • 1.11 l
G, Xt
i t
C
ELOISE BROWN
Mayor
BERNARDO M. PEREZ
Mayor Pro Tem
CLINT HARPER, Ph. D.
Councilmember
PAUL LAWRASON
Councilmember
SCOTT MONTGOMERY
Councilmember
RICHARD T. HARE
City Treasurer
Mr. Paul Maniar
8440 Reseda Blvd. #107
Northridge, CA 91324
a�
ily 7, 1989
Re: A TO Z STORAGE 5040 GOIIDMvN AVENUE
r
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J. KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
This letter will serve as a summary of the office hearing which was
held in an attempt to res(lve several violations of the Planned
Development Permit No. PD- 34r -,, Condition No. 30 and 31, storage of
"U -Haul" trailers /trucks and arking of a recreational vehicle on the
above property. The following was discussed and agreed upon.
1. There will be no fui..her parking or storing of "U -Haul"
trailers /trucks on the nF re prop,,r,,'y.
2. There will be no furthe parkin,k, or storing of any recreational
vehicles on the above prc ert-
The City appreciates your wi' "ingness and cooperation in this matter.
Should you have any questions lease c.)ll me at (805) 529 -6864.
Sincerely,
��' Mancin
rank Mancino
Code Enforcement Officer
cc Patrick J. Richards, Direlr_or
File No.: 89 -0042
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -6864
cF.11r;/f'1mnNT P3R-rrST:nR- T-11 -r -1 r
MOORPARK
ELOISE BROWN
Mayor
BERNARDO M. PEREZ
Mayor Pro Tern
CLINT HARPER, Ph. D.
Councilmember
PAUL LAWRASON
Councilmember
SCOTT MONTGOMERY
Councilmember
RICHARD T. HARE
City Treasurer
Mr. Paul Maniar
8440 Reseda Blvd. #107
Northridge, CA 91324
,!rtified Mail
109- 505 -983
ino 23, 1989
RE: A - Z Storage - 5040 Goldm,n Avenur-
Dear Mr. Maniar:
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J. KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
On May 23, 1989, the departrnoynt of Community Development sent you a
letter advising you that you were still in violation of your Planning
Development Permit PD -348 conci tion 30 and 31, (outs id- — —
Haut" trailer /trucks and the ;;parking of. a recreational vehicle).
that time you were asked agairi to voluntarily comply by removing the "U
Haul" truck /trailers and recrt- ational vehicle. A follow up inspection
did show that you did comply `,ut. ,just. for a short period of time. A
field inspection conducted on June 20, 1989, and a complaint from one--- -
of your neighbor confirms t.l t •c,)ii ire once again in violation of
PD -348,.
Therefore you are hereby noti
"ied of
G
�
M
1'
o
it City
Hall, 799 Moorpark Avenue. Your
,!rtified Mail
109- 505 -983
ino 23, 1989
RE: A - Z Storage - 5040 Goldm,n Avenur-
Dear Mr. Maniar:
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J. KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
On May 23, 1989, the departrnoynt of Community Development sent you a
letter advising you that you were still in violation of your Planning
Development Permit PD -348 conci tion 30 and 31, (outs id- — —
Haut" trailer /trucks and the ;;parking of. a recreational vehicle).
that time you were asked agairi to voluntarily comply by removing the "U
Haul" truck /trailers and recrt- ational vehicle. A follow up inspection
did show that you did comply `,ut. ,just. for a short period of time. A
field inspection conducted on June 20, 1989, and a complaint from one--- -
of your neighbor confirms t.l t •c,)ii ire once again in violation of
PD -348,.
Therefore you are hereby noti
"ied of
an office hearing to be held
at
10:00 a.m. on June 30, 1989,
it City
Hall, 799 Moorpark Avenue. Your
appearance is not mandatory,
lioweve.r„
failure to appear or removal
of
the "U Hanl" Trailers /Trucks ii
rd Recreational
Vehicle until approval
of
your major modification will 1-ave
thi,
office no other alternative
but
to seek whatever legal action
necessary
to obtain compliance. IE
you
have any questions, please gal
MO ,IT '9
-6864.
Sincerely,
C.lis�r�Cts.z, -;
ran M vino
Code Enforcement Officer
File No. 89- 0042 1
cc: Patrick Richards, Director f Cornmriaity Development
Manager, A -Z Storage, 514n ;oh m,rn %venue, Moorpark, CA 93021
799 Moorpark Avenue Mcxxp-. k, Califoni a 93021 (805) 529 -6864
MDER: COMP40W ftw* I WW 2 wNan additional "rvkm are dooked, and complete items
3 and 4.
Fut your address In the "RETURN T(Y1 Spew On Ow revers side. FaMuns to do this will prevent this
card from being returned to you. Thtrmm M a I rsopnd 0 11 v 0 - rej
date of delNery.
1,y�d For &ddrt� fi— WM2 P9-yM-M!1nX%Wf, � LnLe7,1 ti-naster i
no cheCK r>ox(eslfof &ddftlionail Pervicels) requested, requested, 1 ❑ Show to whom del v *red, date, " addrose"'a address 2 r.] Restricted Dell—e—,
(Earn &-arp)
(Extru charge)
3. Article Addressed to:
PS Form 3800, June 1985
eft-1
, %, —1b 9
1
TXPO of Service:
04 -
4 e
4t S e C1 .1
U A&*t0red insured
El C*dtf-d ii' El COD
, I
01,
T
C
T [13,117
12�1 �01 i
Al'*111" Obtain slor-ftn of wWrss"*
at own and DATE DRIVERED.
5. SIgnaturs — A
44'
E;
C�
>
C,
RECEIVED -.1
8. Signature — AQSM
iA
7. Date of D64v*ry
7;2
10
1
aJ
MDER: COMP40W ftw* I WW 2 wNan additional "rvkm are dooked, and complete items
3 and 4.
Fut your address In the "RETURN T(Y1 Spew On Ow revers side. FaMuns to do this will prevent this
card from being returned to you. Thtrmm M a I rsopnd 0 11 v 0 - rej
date of delNery.
1,y�d For &ddrt� fi— WM2 P9-yM-M!1nX%Wf, � LnLe7,1 ti-naster i
no cheCK r>ox(eslfof &ddftlionail Pervicels) requested, requested, 1 ❑ Show to whom del v *red, date, " addrose"'a address 2 r.] Restricted Dell—e—,
(Earn &-arp)
(Extru charge)
3. Article Addressed to:
4 Alf)cle Number
eft-1
, %, —1b 9
Ck-dez 16% 41. .4
TXPO of Service:
04 -
4 e
4t S e C1 .1
U A&*t0red insured
El C*dtf-d ii' El COD
, I
01,
P E-p— ❑ a
Al'*111" Obtain slor-ftn of wWrss"*
at own and DATE DRIVERED.
5. SIgnaturs — A
44'
Adidmaes'• Address (ONLY(/
x
ft"eved andfow paw
RECEIVED -.1
8. Signature — AQSM
JUN ;2 9
7. Date of D64v*ry
MOORPARK
ELOISE BROWN
Mayor
BERNARDO M. PEREZ
Mayor Pro Tern
CLINT HARPER, Ph. D.
Councilmember
PAUL LAWRASON
Councilmember
SCOTT MONTGOMERY
Councilmember
RICHARD T. HARE
City Treasurer
Mr. Paul Maniar
8440 Reseda Blvd. ;107
Northridge, CA 91324
C fi^ �Up
N ty 23, 1' +89
r,,r,�ifieo Mail
88E :10'. 881
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J. KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
Re: A to Z Storage 5040 Goldma7 Avenue Moorpark CA 93021
On May 17, 1989 I met with tle Director of Community Development, in
reference to the violation of your Planning Development Permit PD -348
condition 30 and 31; outside storage :)f "U Haul's Trailers /Trucks and
Parking of Recreational Vehicl s. It :s the desire of the Mr. Patrick
Richards, Director of Communal Development, that until you have filed
for an approval of a Major Modffi(,ition the storage of "U Haul"
Trailers /Trucks and the parked. e�rea2i nal vehicles are in violation of
the Permit.
Therefore, we are again reques ing your voluntary compliance within (5)
days from the receipt of t',is letter-, by removing the "U Haul"
Trailers /Trucks and the recrea ional vehicle. A field inspection will
be conducted by this office, s, as to c,otermine compliance. Should this
matter not be resolved, we w:il have nc other alternative but to request
revocation of your planning de r- .lopm(,n pormit PD -348 with the planning
commission.
If you have any questions, plr, e call ,e at 529 -6864.
Sincerely,
�1-- YZGr rank 2a�Z cino
Code Enforcement Officer
File No. 89 -0042
cc: Patrick J. Richards, D irc,,
Jonne Jones, Manager
A to Z Storage 5040 Goldmm
or of C(,mmunity Dev ^.lopment
Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorp,: x, C.fliforn a 93021 (805) 529 -6864
r CD
r� N
Q CO
1- 1 v
CJ
CD
cc -._. _._ - -t- t
i._ t_-__
Ito wO� I
_
M w
171 C)
co LL
to
11 y
t
a i
' Nrv)Cet are desired, an' pie a -sAs
+ 3 and
Put address in the "RETURN TO" Space
Y P e reverse side, Failure to do th t v+ui p =a art this
,i card from being returned to you The return receipt fee will Dro0i
0 yp, the name of the person dei;..ered j
to and the date of delivery For e3d bone ees the following aery es ere aver a e, onsu t postmaster
or toes and c ec ox es for additional serviced) requested.
1. 0 Show to whom delivered, date, and addressee's address.
2. ❑ Restricted Delivery
(Extra charge)
(Extra charge)
3. Article Addressed to:
4. Artl I Number I
j Mr. Paul Mani ar ' �' .
P 8 70 881 I
T W of Servlce: i
/
❑ Registered ❑ Insured
8440 Reseda B1 vd. 7#107
CerUfl d 11 COD ,
x r'
r� Rot Receipt
❑ Express Mall LJ for Merchandise I
•'' Northrid e CA 91324
9 s
-�
r
Always obtain signature of addressee
'•
or pent and DATE DELIVERED.
5. Signature — Address
8. Addressee's Address (ONLY if
X {.
- qu-ted and fee paid)
:RECEIVE D
6. Signature — Agent
X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X
•' t'
MAY 3 0 ;
Delivery 7. Date of
,- ry
VS Form 3811, Mar. 1988 a U.S.Q.P.O. 1988- 212 -885 nn NlrrzTrr• PITT -
ELOISE BROWN
Mayor
BERNARDO M. PEREZ
Mayor Pro Tem
CLINT HARPER, Ph. D.
Councilmember
PAUL LAWRASON
Councilmember
SCOTT MONTGOMERY
Councilmember
RICHARD T. HARE
City Treasurer
A to Z Storage
5040 Goldman Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Mr. Mike Thaker:
,y 3, 19£)9
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J. KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
On February 13, 1989 our DeF:.artrnent sent you a letter regarding a
inspection that was conducted cf your property, revealing that you were
in violation of the Development Plan Permit No. PD -348, Condition 30 and
31 (see attached Resolution Ai 1. 87 -12`7 regarding now outside storage
shall be permitted and no st rage of- recreati -nal vehicles shall be
permitted.
A field inspection conducted or, April 20, 1989 has revealed that you are
still.- continuing to store cuts de storage "U- haul" trailers/ trucks, and
the storage of recreational v-1 ties,.
We are requesting your voluntai, compliance immediately upon the receipt
of this letter, by removing Sze recreational vehicle and the U -Haul
trailers /trucks. A field inspection well be conducted by this office,
so as to determine compliance, Shou2l this matter not be resolved we
will have no other alternat - Lut ro revoke your Development Plan
Permit No. DP -348.
If you have any questions p1e,c, ccntac me by calling (805) 529 -6864.
Sincerely,
L-22��LLrcCtc ca
Frank Mancino
Code Enforcement Officer
file: DP -348
CC: Patrick J. Richards, DC'D
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, Califon a 93021 (805) 529 -6864
A TO Z SELF STORAGE, LTD.
8448, RESEDA BLVD. # 107
NORTHRIDGE, CA 91324
818_701 0596
Ma
To: Mr. Frank. Mancincl,
Cade Enforcement Officer,
City of Moorpark -,
799, Moorpark Avenue.
Moorpark., Ca . 93ci21.
Subject : A to Z Self Storage- Ltd. I). P.348, at 5040 -5060,
Goldman Avenue, �1-:" p:a -� , �a 93�i ^1
Dear Mr. Mancino,
With respect to your letter 1'389 we would like to sr_cbmit
as follows:
1. We had a meeting with tyre ir(?ct- :-r Of Community Development Mr.
Pat Richards on March 1'b, 1981) ?1p-,nse to his letter . =.f February
13, 198'3.
�. During the meeting_ we r;aci
several ether items. Mr Richard
modification to DP -348 condi.
Recognizinq the me inr_cmental tas�:
we had agreed c1n atleast 8 to
same. We are currently working car
is as soon as we can.
dascr_cssed his letter matter and
re(,_-mmended r_cs to file for a ma.jc,r
ns t: cover the desired items.
;tre
.),--,r modification application,
weep .f time to prepare for the
tt,e p� !age and would lil::e to submit
Mr. Mancino, obviously
YOU wE
e riot kware of this and we
are sorry
_ that you had to go through
the tr
uble of reminding us on the
s:ub.ject,
which we are currently working
Ae ;,Ian tt_. get together
with Mr.
Richards and /or his staff
for t,
f.isi submission of the
documents
in the near future.
Please feel free to cc-nta( -he rr:dersigned at 818- 71)1 -C)"S for
any question.
Sincerely yours,
Paul Maniar, G.P.
A to Z Self Stc-rage, Ltd.
cc: Mike Thakar
Jonne Jones, Res. Manager.
Patrick Richard, City of Mcc ')are::.
Deb -Drah Traffenstclt, City _,t
MOORPARK
ELOISE BROWN
Mayor
BERNARDO M. PEREZ
Mayor Pro Tern
CLINT HARPER, Ph. D.
Councilmember
PAUL LAWRASON
Councilmember
SCOTT MONTGOMERY
Councilmember
RICHARD T. HARE
City Treasurer
Mr. Paul Maniar
8448 Reseda Blvd. #107
Northridge, CA 91321
No\,emb( 22, 1989
Ref: A to Z Storage 5040 Gol(:.nan Avertie
Dear Mr. Maniar:
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J. KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
While on routine field inspection in your area on November 14, 1989,
Code Enforcement staff obsc—ved that you are storing /parking U -Haul
trucks (6) and trailers (2) c:i the above addressed property. This is in
violation of your Development P1a=' Permit No. DP -348.
We are requesting your vol ntary compliance by removing all U -Haul
trucks /trailers upon receipt of thir letter. If this matter is not
resolved, this office will have n_, other alternative but to seek
whatever legal action needed > gain _ ompliance.
A field inspection will be ducted )y this office, so as to determine
compliance after the above (ir- Tf ,ou have any questions, please call
me at 529 -6864.
Sincerely,
Frank Mancino
Code Enforcement Officer
File No. 89 -0202
cc: Patrick J. Richards, Dire(tor of Community Development
Manager - A to Z Storage, 040 (,o]tlman Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
EXHIBIT._
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorp irk, California 93021 (805) 529-6864
--
890202 /CIfRON1 PJR: DST- P11 7I;W:I ;1 t - - -- --
IC, f
No\,emb( 22, 1989
Ref: A to Z Storage 5040 Gol(:.nan Avertie
Dear Mr. Maniar:
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J. KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
While on routine field inspection in your area on November 14, 1989,
Code Enforcement staff obsc—ved that you are storing /parking U -Haul
trucks (6) and trailers (2) c:i the above addressed property. This is in
violation of your Development P1a=' Permit No. DP -348.
We are requesting your vol ntary compliance by removing all U -Haul
trucks /trailers upon receipt of thir letter. If this matter is not
resolved, this office will have n_, other alternative but to seek
whatever legal action needed > gain _ ompliance.
A field inspection will be ducted )y this office, so as to determine
compliance after the above (ir- Tf ,ou have any questions, please call
me at 529 -6864.
Sincerely,
Frank Mancino
Code Enforcement Officer
File No. 89 -0202
cc: Patrick J. Richards, Dire(tor of Community Development
Manager - A to Z Storage, 040 (,o]tlman Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
EXHIBIT._
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorp irk, California 93021 (805) 529-6864
--
890202 /CIfRON1 PJR: DST- P11 7I;W:I ;1 t - - -- --
MOORPARK
ELOISE BROWN
Mayor
�f
2
BERNARDO M. PEREZ
9.12.040, as an administrative
ietN�rmination.
Mayor Pro Tern
X
date of receipt of this letter
CLINT HARPER, Ph. D.
Councilmember
fT
'oA_
is $432.00.
PAUL LAWRASON
„=
Councilmember
SCOTT MONTGOMERY
Councilmember
RICHARD T. HARE i l y 19, 1989
City Treasurer art , f i ed Mail
Mr. Paul Maniar
8448 Reseda Blvd. #107
Northridge, CA 91321
Re: A to Z Storage, 5040 Goldm +i Avenue
Dear Mr. Maniar:
As stated in a number of let ers from this office
hearing conducted by the Code %nforcement Officer, t
Department remains the same. f you park, or store,
rental trailers /trucks or iec eational vehicles on
are in violation of your Devel ,me.tA, P l riv Permit No.
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J. KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
, and at an office
he position of this
any "U Haul" type
your property; you
PD 348.
The U Haul type rental trail r /trucks or recreational vehicles being
stored or parked on your prope ty is not a permitted use, authorized by
Condition 31 on your DP -348. At the )ffice hearing, although you did
not agree with staff's decisio -.s, you (aid agree to comply. As far as I
am concerned this matter is ( osed. If violations continues to occur
then this office will have rr, other ii1ternative but to seek whatever
legal action necessary to obt in .onipl innce. We will also initiate a
request for revocation of ycur '1+inuiryd !lr,velopment Permit.
If you should disagree with m,
de<_isiwt it is
appealable
under Section
9.12.040, as an administrative
ietN�rmination.
You have 15
days from the
date of receipt of this letter
() rip1)ei . The
filing fee
is $432.00.
I would also like to remind y, that your temporary ground sign (A to Z
Storage) is in violation and ai t If, i(rioved immediately upon receipt of
this letter.
Sincerely,
Patrick J. ?'chards
Director o ommunity Developm, :t
cc: Frank Mancino, Code Enfor ert fiff ccr
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529-6864
CFnc; /(-ITR7,1T T'TR I'¢T n� 7 ,i.r
10-11EVIONIVO ttL"n
ELOISE BROWN
Mayor
BERNARDO M. PEREZ
Mayor Pro Tern
CLINT HARPER, Ph. D.
Councilmember
PAUL LAWRASON
Councilmember
SCOTT MONTGOMERY
Councilmember
RICHARD T. HARE
City Treasurer
Mr. Paul Maniar
8440 Reseda Blvd. #107
Northridge, CA 91324
a;
y , 1999
Re: A TO Z STORAGE 5040 GOLDMA'� AVENUE
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J. KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
This letter will serve as a srmmary of the office hearing which was
held in an attempt to reso]re several violations of the Planned
Development Permit No. PD -348 Condition No. 30 and 31, storage of
"U -Haul" trailers /trucks and pz}rking of a recreational vehicle on the
above property. The following is +liscussed and agreed upon.
1. There will be no fur'?,er par King or storing of "U -Haul"
trailers /trucks on the ab( , o ogre r tea.
2. There will be no further .)arking or storing of any recreational
vehicles on the above prol -ty
The City appreciates your wil ngness end cooperation in this matter.
Should you have any questions F as„ ral me at (805) 529 -6864.
Sincerely,
rank Mancino
Code Enforcement Officer
cc Patrick J. Richards, Dire( )r
File No.: 89 -0042
799 Moorpark Avenue Mairpaf k, Califomia 93021 (805) 529 -6864
r.F.nr; /f 1tNnv T r' T - r)ST • nn • x71,4 • �•, . , .
PS Form 3800, June 1985
,JT
�1
a
;3c
A
� i ti, i
ff
.1_
M
m
n
m �
$ O o
M _n
� m
N F M !]
M
®SENDER: Complete Items 1 and 2 when additional services are desired, and complete Items
3 and 4.
Put your address M the "RETURN TO" Space on tM reverse
side. Feilun to do this will prevent this
o the name o} the arson delivered
card from being returned to you. Th return will
to and the date of delivery. twor a lt ona sea w
vi
sery cos are oval a e. Consult postmaster
or lees a na cheCK DUAM31 for additional servicalsl requested.
1. 0 Show to whom delivered, date, end sddras•ss's address. 2. 0 Restricted Dc� livery
(F-vru charge
3. Article Addressed to:
4. Article Number pp
�''LL
T' �rv'cJ��
(L (y��.,�{�/��
�T 7 d 'Y—
pe0}
❑ Insured
/ lt""""
�! �Z
����
geglstered
GrUflad ❑ COO
❑ Express Mag " gfo Receipt
Mer hendise
Always obtain signature of addressee
or agent and DATE DELIVERED.
6. Signature — Address
S. Addressee's Address (ONLY (f
requesW and fee paid)
X
8. Signature — Apen
F
X
7� Da
'%r <. • Mgt' , ,�;
Y
y'r[
e �
a
.t • ..
Ki
MOORPARK
ELOISE BROWN
:P
z
Mayor
BERNARDO M. PEREZ
Mayor Pro Tom
CLINT HARPER, Ph. D.
Councilmember
PAUL LAWRASON
Councilmember
SCOTT MONTGOMERY
Councilmember
RICHARD T. HARE
:t i f ied Mail
City Treasurer
09- 505 -1)83
e 73. ; )89
Mr. Paul Maniar
8440 Reseda Blvd. #107
Northridge, CA 91324
RE: A - Z Storage - 5040 Goldma Avenue
Dear Mr. Maniar:
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J. KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
On May 23, 1989, the departme L of Community Development sent you a
letter advising you that you k re still in violation of your Planning
P.evelopment Permit PD -348 conch ion 30 <ind 31, (out-,i(1- of, , -- n�
Hauk" trailer /trucks and the 1).trking of a recreational vehicle).
that time you were asked again o voluntarily comply by removing the U
Haul" truck /trailers and recrent.ional. vehicle. A follow up inspection
did show that you did comply l; it just, for a short period of time. A
field inspection conducted on une 20, 1989, and a complaint from one --
of your neighbor confirms t1ki yogi i e once again in violation of
PD -348.
Therefore you are hereby nct_i f ed of ari office hearing to be held at
10:00 a.m. on June 30, 1989, a City Fall, 799 Moorpark Avenue. Your
appearance is not mandatory. rOwever, failure to appear or removal of
the "U Haul" Trailers /Trucks an : Recreational Vehicle until approval of
your major modification will. i;, e '1iis office no other alternative but
to seek whatever legal actic-,n ece;s��r,, to obtain compliance. If you
have any questions, please (:0 rr -6,364
Sincerely,
ran M ;�,d
Code Enforcement Officer
File No. 89 -0042 °
cc: Patrick Richards, Director f Common ty Development
Manager, A -Z Storage, 5040 lw'maia t-enue, Moorpark, CA 93021
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpar California 93021 (805) 529 -6864
PS Form 3800, June 1985
0
3
ar
SENDER: COMP'*ls lt*nw I WW 2 Wt*n 06dkk"W &W0008 are desired. and �o,,-!ala
3 and 4.
Put your address In the "RETURN T(Y- Boom on "
.
rqvqrso side F*Rure to do -hl& will p7e
cord from being retumed to ;WZ�
0 rn 648
to and t 0 del f d live or UW TQ*gWlng
' 00'
YeRl PrQVIdUM the person
-18I , ivi,
2-1 0 V.
59TV 11 M (;onsult pcstma-
tor tees ane, ci-2c for additional 1114-40616) Mussled.
1. 0 Show to versid, data, end address. 2. C3 Restricted Delivery
T-77o4-71
T��-11111
3. Article Addressed to:
4. A Is Number
I
i;T
Z, L ag
ire of Service:
U
4 t e- se, cl Certified COD
411 0 q
47
Always Obtain Signature of addresses
OWR and DATE DIEUVERED.
5. Signature - A
<
x
roposlied and fee ako
p
RECEIVED
6. Signature - Agent
JUN 2 9,*1989
7. Date of slivery`
ar
M^ r-- 4Q1 I sr.. lots 6 of 0 a p n,
SENDER: COMP'*ls lt*nw I WW 2 Wt*n 06dkk"W &W0008 are desired. and �o,,-!ala
3 and 4.
Put your address In the "RETURN T(Y- Boom on "
.
rqvqrso side F*Rure to do -hl& will p7e
cord from being retumed to ;WZ�
0 rn 648
to and t 0 del f d live or UW TQ*gWlng
' 00'
YeRl PrQVIdUM the person
-18I , ivi,
2-1 0 V.
59TV 11 M (;onsult pcstma-
tor tees ane, ci-2c for additional 1114-40616) Mussled.
1. 0 Show to versid, data, end address. 2. C3 Restricted Delivery
CA")
(Firm charge)
3. Article Addressed to:
4. A Is Number
Qa�1
'b
Z, L ag
ire of Service:
U
4 t e- se, cl Certified COD
411 0 q
� , Glu-
❑ E.P. Mal Iflo M4,1C
Always Obtain Signature of addresses
OWR and DATE DIEUVERED.
5. Signature - A
-4
IL Addressisio's Address (ONLY(/
x
roposlied and fee ako
p
RECEIVED
6. Signature - Agent
JUN 2 9,*1989
7. Date of slivery`
M^ r-- 4Q1 I sr.. lots 6 of 0 a p n,
MOORPARK
ELOISE BROWN
Mayor
BERNARDO M. PEREZ
Mayor Pro Tem
CLINT HARPER, Ph. D.
Councilmember
PAUL LAWRASON
Councilmember
SCOTT MONTGOMERY
Councilmember
RICHARD T. HARE
City Treasurer
Mr. Paul Maniar
8440 Reseda Blvd. ;'107
Northridge, CA 91324
4 . V2 1039
C -tilied Mail
05 [ 1 381
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J. KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
Re: A to Z Storage 5040 Goldma! Avenue loorpark CA 93021
On May 17, 1989 I met with th,
reference to the violation of
condition 30 and 31; outsi(le
Parking of Recreational Vehicl«
Richards, Director of Community,
for an approval of a Major
Trailers /Trucks and the parkood
the P-ermit..
Therefore, we are again request
days from the receipt of th
Trailers /Trucks and the recreal .
be conducted by this office, so
matter not be resolved, we will
revocation of your planning do,
commission.
If you have any questions, p'e3
Sincerely,
'�— z �1's
rank ancino
Code Enforcement Officer
File No. 89 -0042
cc: Patrick J. Richards, Diren�
Jonne Jones, Manager
A to Z Storage 5040 Goldmdi
Director of Community Development, in
,our Planning Development Permit PD -348
orage )f "U Haul" Trailers /Trucks and
It ii the desire of the Mr. Patrick
Development, that until you have filed
"°;odification the storage of "U Haul"
crea.' i(oal vehicles are in violation of
ig your voluntary compliance within (5)
s letter, by removing the "U Haul"
Tonal vehicle. A field inspection will
S to determine compliance. Should this
-ave no ether alternative but to request
lopmw L Do,r:mit PD -348 with the planning
at 529 -6864.
r of Community Development
Avenue, Moorpnrk, CA 93021
799 Moorpark Avenue MooMwy Cal forma 93021 (805) 5216864
PIN
®SENDER ;mpintn -m-1 -- er d i when additional services are desired, s ^!
3 and 4. `
Put your address in the "RETURN TO" Space on the reverse side. Failure to do this will prevent this I
card from being returned to you The return re�cei�t fee will prOvido you the name of the person ;te ,_,ered
to and the date of dal vet . For addiiioneT eef s .l following services are avei a O- Consult postmsster i
For Tees an c ec ox as I for additional services) requested.
1. 0 Show to whom delivered, date, and addressee's address. 2 0 Restricted Delive-;
(Extra charge) (Extra charge) j
3. ,Article Addressed to: 4.PArtti`Ip N 7um bar 881
Mr. Paul Maniar )
T4 of Service. ;
ReyI tared ❑ insured
r
8440 Resedd' B1 vd. ` #107 El D•�'ad D COD
�' ❑ Express Mail ❑ Rat um Receipt
for Merchandise
Northridge, CA 91324 Always obtain signature of addressee
or agent and DATE DELIVERED,
5. Signature — Address 8. Addressee's Address (ONLY if s..._.
X requened and fee paid)
6. Signature — Agent R E C E I V E D
X zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz z
7. Date of Delivery MAY 3 0 "39
PS Form 3811, Mu. 1988 a U SAIP.0. 1988 -212 -885 DOMESTIC RETURN AFCFWT
J
til CAI
��
OI
N
I
CO
W
Paz Q,I
L
jl
I
)
M
w
°Ecc
r-
U
8.
=
Ln
oar
-6
a,
Ua,
o 3
LLN��I
�I
Ln(1,40
PIN
®SENDER ;mpintn -m-1 -- er d i when additional services are desired, s ^!
3 and 4. `
Put your address in the "RETURN TO" Space on the reverse side. Failure to do this will prevent this I
card from being returned to you The return re�cei�t fee will prOvido you the name of the person ;te ,_,ered
to and the date of dal vet . For addiiioneT eef s .l following services are avei a O- Consult postmsster i
For Tees an c ec ox as I for additional services) requested.
1. 0 Show to whom delivered, date, and addressee's address. 2 0 Restricted Delive-;
(Extra charge) (Extra charge) j
3. ,Article Addressed to: 4.PArtti`Ip N 7um bar 881
Mr. Paul Maniar )
T4 of Service. ;
ReyI tared ❑ insured
r
8440 Resedd' B1 vd. ` #107 El D•�'ad D COD
�' ❑ Express Mail ❑ Rat um Receipt
for Merchandise
Northridge, CA 91324 Always obtain signature of addressee
or agent and DATE DELIVERED,
5. Signature — Address 8. Addressee's Address (ONLY if s..._.
X requened and fee paid)
6. Signature — Agent R E C E I V E D
X zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz z
7. Date of Delivery MAY 3 0 "39
PS Form 3811, Mu. 1988 a U SAIP.0. 1988 -212 -885 DOMESTIC RETURN AFCFWT
POOO 31,
ELOISE BROWN
Mayor
BERNARDO M. PEREZ
Mayor Pro Tom
CLINT HARPER, Ph. D.
Councilmember
PAUL LAWRASON
Councilmember
SCOTT MONTGOMERY
Councilmember
RICHARD T. HARE
City Treasurer
A to Z Storage
5040 Goldman Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Mr. Mike Thaker:
pM �Cy
0
� C _
M, 7 9fi I
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J. KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
On February 13, 1989 our Dep,,rtment cent you a letter regarding a
inspection that was conducted o your property, revealing that you were
in violation of the Development F -lan Permit No. PD -348, Condition 30 and
31 (see attached Resolution N(I 87 -12? regarding now outside storage
shall be permitted and no stc age of recreational vehicles shall be
permitted.
A field inspection conducted on April 2C 1989 has revealed that you are
still` - continuing to store outsi ie stor-ac�e "U- haul" trailers/ trucks, and
the storage of recreational -eh 1F�s.
We are requesting your voluntar-
of this letter, by removing t
trailers /trucks. A field inspe
so as to determine compliance
will have no other alternati�.,
Permit No. DP -348.
compliance immediately upon the receipt
recreational vehicle and the U -Haul
tion will be conducted by this office,
�;houl.cl this matter not be resolved we
''ut t revoke your Development Plan
If you have any questions plea,,, contact me by calling (805) 529 -6864.
Sincerely,
L-- ���CLszCt�c.c
Frank ancino
Code Enforcement Officer
file: DP -348
CC: Patrick J. Richards, DCh
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorparta
rnnc -t: /riznn-
California 93021 (805) 529 -6864
A TO Z SELF STORAGE, LTD.
8448, RESEDA BLVD. # 107
NORTHRIDGE, CA 91324
818 -701 0596
May
T,_,: Mr. Frank Mancino,
/ Cade Enforcernent Officer,
5� City _If Mc,c-rpark,
799, i1 rpart: Avenue.
Mc,- Drpark, Ca . '93021 .
Subject : A to Z Self Storacie td. D.. P.348, at 5(')4ir- 5(i60,
Goldman Avenue, Mc:: ar U-4 ':a3cJ'21
Dear Mr. Mancino,
Ni+-h respect to your letter Mar 3.. 1'38'J we wc.uld like to submit
as follows:
1. We had a meeting with the r =ctor Of Community Development Mr.
Pat Richards on March 1 -, 198' reap. , se to his letter f FebrUary
18, 1'8'3.
2. Durinq the meeting we had
several ether items. Mr Richard
mod ificatiob tc, DP -340 condl t
Recoqni inq the mc- riumental task
we had agreed rn atleast 8 tc, 1
same. We are currently working r
is as soon as we can.
Mr. Mancino, �?bviously yrnu we:
that you had to gc, thrc-ugh the t:r,
which we are currently W-Drk:inq
Richards and/,---r his staff for t, .
in the near future.
Please feel free tc, cc -ntac "';
any question.
Sincerely y._Jurs,
Paul Maniar, G. P.
A to Z Self Stc,racge, Ltd.
lsc discussed his letter matter and
e :, mme -i d ad us t f 11 e for a ma j-r
t _. CI_,ver the desired items.
t11 -I1.2 'n r. madifi catic-n application
�cyetc�,
-f time to prepare for the
- ::,Age and wc,ul d l i�::e to submit
i,_t aw,_Are of this and we are sorry
ble 0I remindinq us on the subject,
ive F>'an to clet tc,gether with Mr.
n <11 submissic-n of the documents
F ;-ir ter= signed it 818 - C�1- G5• _7 +o f 1r
cc: Mike Thak:ar
Jonne Jcines, Res. Manager.
Patrick Richard, City c-f
Debc-rah Traffensst 1t, City
, A
A TO Z SELF" STORAGE, LTD.
8619 , RESI''A 13LVD. # 302
NORTHRIh E, CA 31324
81h 01 0597
December 26, 1989. ATTACHMENT
Paul Lawrason, Mayor.,
City of Moorpark.
799, Moorpark avenue.
Moorpark, Ca 92021.
Subject : A to Z Self Storage
5040 -5060, Goldman Avenue
Moorpark, California 93021
DP -348, Modification
Reference .
1. A to Z Application for 'lac f: - , dated 9- 27 -89, transmitted
dated September 29, 1989, fr.: Fia <<tr to Richards.
2. City of Moorpark Planning p,,- , :)'taff Report„ Dated December 4,
1989, DP -348, Major Modifi _;:.t No 1,
3. A to Z Comments and Resp,:)ri, 'c staff report, transmittal dated
December 4, 1989 from Paul ii- 'lember of Planning Commission,
City of Moorpark.
Dear Mr. Lawrason:
A to Z self storage applic i>i f(,rr the entitlement reference 1,
included request for (i) storage :)` recreational vehicles (ii) storage
of rental transportation equipme t suc-i as U -Haul (iii) Miscellaneous
services associated with selt: or,ize `>usiness and (iv) Sundays and
extended hours of operation.
Relative to our request a e, dlr;.ng the public hearing meeting
on December 4, 1989, we had n opportunity to hear the concerns
expressed by immediate neighs r3 wE. also had an opportunity to
review, the concerns expressed e ~;iff report„ reference 2 above.
After hearing, understand: g aac evaluating the sensitivity,
concerns and the opinions exar, s(i ) these groups, we reconsidered
our request for modification the same as follows:
A. LAND USE MODIFICA -ION
We rescind__our request f�)!
-/1. Outdoor storage of Ret_r, c I e s
2. Propane Gas filling S.<-- >
3. Rental `,Iai 1 Boxes
4. Storage of rental. traits: r_.c t on the site
r
— RECEIVED
DEC 2 9 IM
City of Moorpark
We hereby withdraw above ms �n tneir entirety--R-e tive to
itQ_m._4_, we would like to cont.inu. worki-,g as ,,Broker Referral for the
'U-Haul. The broker referral open; on would not involve any trucks and
or trailer storage cr rent n n 11r f chit
.As we under stanu 'it, in the
answer the phone calls and boob:
necessary paper work. We will ha,
up or dropped off from our st
opportunity to _,er,,e, the co mm u;,
community and the -haul.
We would like to clari.t
her U -haul like truck or trail,
or unload their belongings. 1'l
referral service.
B. MISCELLANEOUS ACTIVITIES :
We request the miscellaneous
a Surety Performance Bond. The see
1. Installation of a Public Telept
2. Installation of Vending Machirf
etc.
3. Installation of FAX and Copyin:
4. Sale of Packaging Material
ererril service all we will do is,
.ehi.:le for the customers and do
: t=ucks or trailers to be picked
ge fa :ility. This will give us an
stav in ouch with both the
trait ,ome customer may bring his or
re it e i -from other facility to load
-; Eot to be confused with our
�errices be permitted without fiiino
i,�s o be permitted will include:
ne in each building
)r leverages, snacks, and Candies
M i,:.h roes
The above services are for n-niernce of our customers and the
rationale for these activities 3r, i,- ;cr bid in enclosure # D. of our
application, reference 1 above.
C. HOURS OF OPERATION :
Most importantly to serve t e community better and to remain
competitive and a viable business, we must_ remain open on SUNDAYS. For
the same reasons, we would also i':st t> extend hours of operation,
seasonally adjusted as follows:
1. FALL AND WINTER HOURS :
Beginning third Sunday it II(ber through Third Saturdav in
February of each year.
• GATE OPERATION :
Monday through Saturday 7.00 AM to 7.00 PM.
Sunday ................. 9.00 Am to 5.00 Phi.
• OFFICE HOURS:
Monday through Saturday ...... 9.00 AM to 6.00 PM.
Sunday ................. . . ......11.00 AM to 5.00 P1•1.
2. SPRING AND SUMMER HOURS
Beginning Third Sunday ir, rrary through Third Saturdav in
October of each year.
• GATE OPERATION :
Monday through Saturday .,. ....... ).00 AM to 8.30 PM.
Sunday ................. ... . ........ .?.00 Am to 5.30 PM.
• OFFICE HOURS:
Monday through Saturda,.
Sunday................
We request your permission;
in accordance w: td the above r
We urge you to allow us
business so much depends on ou
first vear of operation we ha
restriction. e. g. by the end
occupancy at an average of
of today, we are only 35% occ_up
that we are losing lot of client.
3.00 AM to 6.00 PM.
— ........10,00 AM to 6.00 PM.
91 ),:ng us to operate our facility
remain open on Sunday because our
availability on Sundays. During the
lost lot of business due to this
Dec tuber 1989, we should have 60%
)sor:ot:on rate per month. Instead, as
>d. tie know from our marketing effort
es u� to being closed on Sundays.
In our business, maximum rafti. is usually on weekends and
specially on Sundays. You wou appre iate the simple fact that in
order to remain a viable bus.: s n'it,, we nust have freedom to
remain open Sundays.
We will monitor and endeav;r to assure that our Sunday operation
will not disturb our neighbors. We request this be approved without
Surety Bond or any condition. w :1' pct responsibly and will be
sensitive to our neighbors.
To the best of our knowled— there are self storage facilities in
Orange and Los Angeles Counties 'hiC re located next to residential
areas. These facilities remai; n undays.
In summary, we must have Sum }v__coperation available because:
•. Other service business i.- .eigFb rhood remain open on Sundays
•. In order to remain compe>
remain open on Sundays,
S. Sunday is very convenien
for households.
•. Self storage activity
innocent.
ive 3, d viable business, we must
F c(D mpetiti)n
ay c� storage -ind moving activity
ii ert•n* ly very quiet , light and
•. In excess of 95 o of Unit are located inside concrete
buildings which isolate iii ate the outside environment.
Keeping the sensitivity of
are eager to serve the corimur,
the community of Moorpark an::
this goal. Please keep in mir;r.
existing conditions of DP -348.
necessary, to remain a viable hu
intent of DP -348 conditions.
ne.ghbors in mind, in conclusion we
and p.ov tde badly needed service to
r'�q est your support in achieving
rat u, request would not compromise
US, SUNDAY OPERATION is absolutelv
nes ntity without compromising the
Please feel free to contac
clarification or further inform
will be more !:han ready to
clarifications in this regard.
under_-igned at` 318- 701 -0596 for any
ion 1 regards to this request. We
,e .,In: give any and all necessary
We are hoping to hear your tvorab"te answer as soon as possible.
We will also appreciate your in: min,., is in advance for any meetings
to 'attend in r-ec pect to t;lis re
Wish you al: Happy Holiday
Very sincerely yours,
Pramod C. Maniar, G.P.
A to Z Self Storage, Ltd.
Mike Thakar, G.P.
A to Z Self Storage, Ltd.
cc Eloise Brown
Bernardo M. Perez
Clint Harper, Ph. D.
Scott Montgomery
L,,,-Patrick Richards
Steven Kueny
,son a d very nappy New Year.
Note The references 1, 2 ai ? as cited in this letter will be
transmitted by Mr. P, k R:i,hards to the members of the
council separately.