HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1990 0117 CC REG ITEM 11HII
zze/01359 -026S
1
a,
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ITEM •
CHERYL J. KANE, City Attorney,
CITY OF MOORPARK; and
BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSF. N
JAMES R. FELTON
624 South Grand Avenue, Suite 1140
Los Angeles, California 91017
(213) 236 -0600
Attorneys for Plaintiff:,
CITY OF MOORPARK
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF VENTURA
CITY OF-MOORPARK,
a municipal corporation,
Plaintiff,
V8.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISCN, et
Defen&.nts.
CASE NO. 97019
STIPULATION FOR JUDGMENT
Plaintiff CITY CF MOORPARK (hereinafter "City ") and
Defendants SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON (hereinafter "Edison ")
agree and stipulate that Superic =r Court Case 97019 shall be
dismissed with prejudice :n consideration of the following:
1. The City properly filed an action to acquire the
subject property describf(3 in Exhibits A and B attached hereto,
hereinafter referred to ; -s the "Subject Property ". Exhibit A
Consists of legal descrip: ions ;)f parcels 6, 7, 9, and 11.
Exhibit B consists of .a wo page sketch to accompany the legal
v'
zze /01359 -026S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
all other known claims ar out of the temporary taking of the
Subject Property; and
9. The parties ag -,ee that upon filing of this
Stipulation with the C`)ur :he City may obtain and have entered
an Interlocutory Judgment in Condemnation in the form attached
hereto and incorporates! � rein by reference, marked Exhibit C.
Execution of this stipu:,�� ioi shall be deemed approval of said
Interlocutory Judgment a4 to Form; and
10. The parties "eretr, do agree that upon entry of the
Interlocutory ,judgment a, .iron payment by the City of the sums
required pursuant to the nterlccutory Judgment, the City shall
be entitled, without fu; er no -.ice to Edison, to seek, obtain
and have entered and t�,e- -af"er recorded a Final Order and
Judgment in Condemnation �utnorizing the temporary taking; and
11. The City '—i depoE,ited $4,535.00 into Court and the
parties authorize the Co :t to return the City's deposit of
$4,535.00 to the City w, , al accrued interest.
f Dated: January 10 , 1991,
CHERYL J. KANE, City Attorney
CITY OF MOORPARK; and
BUPKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN
(CITRYL J� KANE
Att eys fo Plaintiff,
CITY OF MOORPARK
Dated: January 4t, 1990 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
DONNA ROVERO
BY dp� ,
DONNA ROVERO
Attorneys for Defendant,
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
- 1-