HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1990 0307 CC REG ITEM 08AMINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Moorpark, California
ITEMS
February 21, 1990
The Regular Meeting of the CAty Ouricil of the City of Moorpark,
California was held on February 2 1.990, in the Council Chambers of
City Hall of said City, locates r '99 Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark,
California.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Lawrason called the meeting to order at the hour of 7:17
p.m.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
The Pledge of Allegiance ,.as led b} Councilmember Montgomery.
3. ROLL CALL:
Present: Councilmember., Brown, Harper, Perez, Montgomery,
and Mayor Laws asorc.
Steven Kueny, City Manager; Richard Hare, Deputy
City Manager; 'at Richards, Director of Community
Services; Deb- -rah Traffenstedt, Senior Planner;
John Knipe, Assistant City Engineer; Susan
Cauldwell, Adn;- nisrrative Assistant; Don Reynolds,
Management Analyst; Lt. Rodriguez, Sheriff's
Department; KeyiGilbert, Director of Public Works;
Phil Newhouse Director of Community Services;
Cheryl Kane, `it:y Attorney; Dorothy Vandaveer,
Deputy City erk; and Sally Coons, Executive
Secretary.
4. PROCLAMATIONS COMMENDATIONS1_AND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS-
None were presented.
5. REORDERING OF AND ADDITIONS TO, _THE AGENDA:
Councilmember Harper requested that a discussion of City
Finances be added to the a iend,a.
MOTION: Councilmember Harper movf -d and Councilmember Perez seconded
a motion to add Agenda Item 11.E •• Discussion of City Finances -
to the Agenda as a matter of necessity having arisen since the
posting of the Agenda. The voic v>r:e was unanimous.
MOTION: Councilmember Brown movet aria Councilmember Harper seconded
a motion to reorder the Discuss.on /Action items on the Agenda as
follows: 1 - 11.D; 2 - 11.F: 3 :. 7; and 4 - 11. K. The voice
vote was unanimous,
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California
6. PUBLIC COMMENTS:
February 21, 1990
6.A. Tom Thompson (12 E 23 Hillside Drive, Moorpark),
representing the Moor park: Presbyterian Church, requested
that the Council consider rescinding its action taken
on February 7, 1990 adopting an interim street section
for Peach Hill Road east of Spring Road. He advised
that the Church was in the process of applying for a
Residential Planned :) evelopment Permit and, because of
the Council's action will be required to redesign their
project.
CONSENSUS: By consensus, tie Council determined to refer this
item to the Community De,,elopment. Committee to meet with
representatives of the Chi,,, ch and city Staff.
6-B. Gary Scott (12395 Spr ,.ng +:,reek Road, Moorpark) addressed
the Council in (:i)pposition to residential trash
collection beginrit( pri-)r t: 7:00 a.m.
6.C. Stan Cohen (300 Esp;anaae Drive, Oxnard) representing
Martin V. Smith 6 As:,ociates, requested the Council to
clarify its action or January 17, 1990 where it was his
understanding that th:h Council approved the simultaneous
processing of the Con diti_ona: Use Permit for the hotel;
and the General P1 ri Amendment Application for the
apartment project
6.D. Joe Alsip (116 Bell Tway, Ventura) requested the Council
to exempt his recent: .y- purchased lot, near Everett and
Wicks Roads, from thF- moratorium on the development of
vacant property ir. t •.r R -1 ai -d R -E Zones.
The Council advised t,;. Alsip that this was an item for
discussion under Age pia : tem 1-1 -C.
6.E. Paul Bollinger (571. Corsa Avenue, Westlake Village)
requested the CouleL. tc consider allowing him to speak
under Discussion /Act n t:em 11.D.
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council determined that Mr.
Bollinger would be recocar zed dur.ng the discussion under
Agenda Item ll.D.
6.F. Paul Maniar (18200 (2h itham Lane, Moorpark) representing
A to Z Storage, ; equ, -Isted the Council to clarify its
action regarding the approved hours of operation.
CONSENSUS: By consensus;, t a �ounc1L reconfirmed their prior
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California
February 21, 1990
action to allow Sunday op(- at ion oiily after the landscaping
is installed.
6.G. Mike Smith (4626 Be,, La Vista, Moorpark) representing
G.I. Rubbish, addressed the Council concerning the Solid
Waste Ordinance bei.n(_p presented for second reading and
adoption. He expressed three items of concern: 1)
that the maximum container size be 45 gallons; 2) that
they be allowed a b:anket enroachment permit for all
commercial container,:, within the city to be issued to
the hauler and not the commercial establishment; and 3)
that the starting crime for Saturday pick -up of
commercial establishnenta. k }e ,adjusted to 7:00 a.m., not
9.00 a.m.
6.H. Jim Safechuck (Moorpark Rubbish) addressed the Council
concerning the Solid Waste Ordinance, advising that an
early start -up time for collection in commercial areas
is safer; and that 4 gallor containers are safer and
quieter.
6.I. Don Pruner (72 Moody ,,'ourt, Thousand Oaks) representing
Pruner Health Services, advised that his ambulance
operation responds t,... approximately 40 calls per month
in Moorpark, and trarsports approximately 24 patients.
Because of recent arti-cles in the press, he encouraged
the Council to open dialogue with Pruner regarding their
concerns with ambulance service and response time. He
further invited Counc.lmembers, press and members of the
Grand ,.jury to ride ai :. >ng with the ambulance drivers to
see their operation I,rsth.and
In response to Counc.,l.member Brown, Mr. Pruner advised
that he was unawar(., -.hat his contract required a ten
minute response t. ime n Poc,rp irk.
6.J. Kristene Griffin (10 ' Vta Colinas, Westlake Village)
representing the granichildrer of Paul E. Griffin, Sr.,
requested the Counci. n,)t hinge the name of the Paul
E. Griffin, Sr. P,tr, .
6.K. Darrel Sneed (1'L91, Silvercrest Street, Moorpark)
advised that once re ,)gnwti.on is given, it should not
be taken away, ani ei urge ?; he Council not to rename
Griffin Park.
6.L. John. Hall (12572 Wes.mont, Moorpark) advised that he
felt the City shoul,A �.eep the name of Paul E. Griffin,
Sr. Park because it i proj,J name to be attached to
the park.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California February 21, 1990
6.M. Charles Fedalen, jr (24005 Ventura Blvd., Calabasas)
Vice President and C,)unsel for Griffin Homes, explained
the complaint againFt Griffin by the FPPC concerning
indirect contributi +,ns made by employees of Griffin
during 1985, 1987 and 1988. The total of the
contributions was $:i 640 and the FPPC fine was $46,000.
He advised that the ompany has taken positive steps to
assure this will not -Lappen ac;:fain. He urged the Council
to retain the narie r' Paul. E Griffin, Sr. Park.
In response to Counq: G ,member Harper, Mr. Fedalen advised
that he did not know .,ho in thie organization authorized
the campaign cont :r; t::ti -o 7=
6.N. Dr. George R. Stim.- (.5744 Milne Circle, Moorpark)
encouraged the Coup :1 '.() retain the name of Paul E.
Griffin, Sr. Par}
6.0. Dick Seibert (7358 Utiversity Drive, Moorpark) advised
that he lived very :lose to the park and urged the
Council to retain thf: name of Paul E. Griffin, Sr. Park;
and he presented a petition signed by 100 persons
requesting the reter ion :�f the name.
6.P. Mo Dean McCullough u; 707 Swift Place, Moorpark) advised
that she is employed at Moorpark College and requested
the Council to ret.ai t'hF� name of Paul E. Griffin, Sr.
Park.
6.Q. John Lane (12591 Cry=,tal Ranch Road) advised that Mr.
Griffin was a caring, givLng and honest man and that the
Council should retai the name of Paul E. Griffin, Sr.
Park. Mr. Lane a,lsc rioted that it was Mr. Pruner who
brought paramedic se vice to the County and he should
be recognized for t h i :7c >ntrLr>ution.
6.R. Paul E. Griffin, Jr. 19436 Kinzie Street, Northridge)
gave an overview of is father's contributions to the
community, and requc ;ted tha^ the Council retain the
name of his father , t'hE Pau E. Griffin, Sr. Park.
In response to Counc i . iember Harper, Mr. Griffin advised
that he would be will ng to br i.ng in the Company's books
for perusal regardi,lc, who in the company authorized the
contributions, bu,-- n+ felt it was an entirely separate
issue and that it wa wr )riq nd hurtful to pursue the
proposed name chang"
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California February 21, 1990
6.5. Ron Miller (Gabbert: �,oad, Moorpark) spoke to the Council
in opposition to tte proposed development of a golf
course, tennis clu,.; and 153 residential units by
Bollinger Development Corporation because it was
incompatible with t e surrounding zoning of 5 and 10
acres_
6.T. Bob Crockford 17.18 Walnut Canyon Road, Moorpark)
advised that his prc:perty abuts the proposed Bollinger
Development, and th,:t: he, as well as three neighbors,
were opposed tc tIE� development for the following
reasons: 1) It is ,ot in compliance with the General
Plan; 2) It is not E:�nsistent. with current planning in
the area; 3) There i.s not a need for an equestrian
center or golf caiar:,e in that area; 4) The increased
density would furtlit hurder the infrastructure.
6.U. Allen Camp (One Boardwalk, Thousand Oaks) representing
Carlsberg, requested authorir.ation to speak under Agenda
Item ll.B. - Statu report regarding PBR's progress
associated with t h, 'ar 1 sber(j Specific Plan.
CONSENSUS: By consensus, ne council determined to recognize
Mr. Camp during the diacu- is,n f F +genda Item 11.B.
6.V. Raymond Clayton (Or:, Thousand Oaks) from
Cohen, Alexander a d :�layton, representing Valley
Commercial Disposal, ::xpressed his support of the City's
efforts to control rr:e collection of solid waste; and
requested that Val1Mi' Commercial Disposal be given a
commercial operat ( is agreement to commence when
Ordinance No. 12' t c- )me 3 {:af f ec. -tive.
6.W. Connie Lawrason (4: ^1 lunbermeadow Street, Moorpark)
addressed the Counti expressing thanks to the Griffin
Family for their --c;rn- ; ik)L.t�.or,s to the community; and to
the City Council fe- .owerinc, the speed limit on Tierra
Rejada Road between gr-Yla, 3 and Sprin(; Road.
7• COMMITTEE REPORTS:
None.
8• CONSENT CALENDAR:
MOTION: Upon motion by COLI)cilmember Harper, seconded by
Councilmember Montgomery, the fol owing consent items were approved
by an unanimous roll call vote:
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California
February 21, 1990
A. Consider approval of the minutes of the Regular City
Council Meeting of December 20, 1989. (Con't from 8.A.
2/7/90). Staff Re ommendation: Approve minutes as
processed.
B. Consider approva.L o: Warrant_ Reqister 1989/90•
Pre -Paid Warrants 10964, 11039 $ 7,985.06
1.1.118 - 11127
Payable Warrants 111 -;! - 11200 $197,447.58
D. Consider Moorpark Emergency Plan. Staff Recommendation:
Receive and file anu authorise submission to state OES
for review.
E. Consider New Requirements under Conflict of Interest
Disclosure Provisions and Rescind Resolutions 83 -45
84 -82, and 89-538-arid Replace with Resolution 90 -636.
Staff Recommendation Approve Resolution No. 90 -636.
F. Consider Acceptance if the Frst Three Traffic Signals
on Tierra Rejada Road. Staff Recommendation: Accept
the three traffic sigriai s on Tierra Rejada Road at Peach
Hill Road, Walnut Creek Road and Mountain Meadows Drive
and reduce the cc.nst uctiori bond to $396,000.
G. Consider Tract 434, 4342 -1 (UWC) Exoneration of
Duplicate Traffic Si.unal Bond at Spring Road and Tierra
Rejada Road. Staff Recommendation: Exonerate above
referenced traffic E 3nai L)orrd effective immediately.
H. Consider Attendance cs:Director of Community Development
at Management Skills Presented by the American
Institute of Certified Planners. Staff Recommendation:
Approve the attendar, th -�� Director to the A.I.C.P.
Workshop.
I. Consider Minor Modification No. .l PD -1065 - A proposal
to provide take out gales of beer and wine. Staff
Recommendation: Rec =.s..ve and file.
J. Consider Budget Amendment Reauthorizing FY 88/89 Park
Improvement Funds to .FY 89/90 Funds for the Improvements
to Monte Vista Nature Park. Staff Recommendation:
Reappropriate fund�r lesjgnai �d for Monte Vista Park
improvements.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California
February 21, 1990
K. Consider Authorizirrg Code Enforcement Officer's
Attendance at Train.inq Seminar on Code Enforcement
Procedures & Techniques. Staff Recommendation: Approve
attendance of the `ode Enforcement Officer at the
Training Seminar
The following item was pa,_ ed from the Consent Calendar for
individual consideration t the Council:
C. Consider Police Department 1989 Annual Report. Staff
Recommendation: Rec -=rive and file.
Councilmember Brcwr ommended the Police Department for
their activities rej rte3 n the 1989 . Annual Report.
Lt. Rodriguez revieHo.d tis written report, addressing
crime rate, calls fo; services. City -wide accident rate,
Highway 118 accicert rat,?, and traffic enforcement.
CONSENSUS: By consensLS r;e oun!il received and filed the
report..
AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, Mayor L,iwrason declared a recess, the time
being 8:50 p.m. The meeting recon,.7E> ed at the hour of 9:10 p.m.
14. CLOSED SESSION:
MOTION: Councilmember Brown movea and Councilmember Perez seconded
a motion to go into Closed SessY;n at the hour of 9:11 p.m. under
Agenda Item 14.B. - Potential lit gat_on pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9 (b)(1). The voi e vote was unanimous.
Attending the Closed Sessi .i were all Councilmembers; Steven
Kueny, City Manager; Pat Richards, Director of Community
Development; and Cheryl Ka r'ity Attorney.
The Meeting reconvened int open session at the hour of 9:55
p.m. City Attorney Chery.. ane announced there was no action
to report as a result of t ore, ::session.
9. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
None.
10. COMMENTS FROM COUNCILMEMBER.S:
Councilmember Brown advised tha. the first project of the Arts
Commission will be a piar D uric e..r t
Minutes of the City Council F
Moorpark, California February 21, 1990
11. DISCUSSION /ACTION ITEMS:
ll.D. Consider Proposal for Development of a Golf Course Tennis
Club and 153 Residential Ur,its (Bollinger Development Corp .j.
Staff recommended denying 11e request of Bollinger Development
Corporation as proposed.
Pat Richards, Director of .,ommunity Development, advised the
Council that the current :::)ning and General Plan designation
of the subject property al�.ows only 5 acre residential lots;
that the proposed development would require a General Plan
Amendment, and the proponer:ts have requested authorization to
be processed outside the - urrent General Plan Update. Mr.
Richards pointed out tha�;: as in the past, Staff is opposed
to such processing as it a;rdermines the intent of the current
General Plan Update. He .+:ivised that Staff and the Community
Development Committee rec:�mmend denial of the proposal by
Bollinger Development Co.-! 1, r.aticrr..
The Council recognized ,1, <1 Hollinger (5743 Corsa Avenue,
Westlake Village) who addressed the Council regarding the
positive and negative aspects of the project. Positives
included the east /west v orr>Ldor; equestrian center and trail;
190 acre golf course; ter lis club; community center; gated
entrance to luxury custom sousing; water; sewer; tax revenue
and community pride. Neg,ir i -,es in ,.luded the RPD zoning and
the General Plan AmendneT t
Council comments includes ne project's incompatibility with
surrounding properties„ >i::rections to removing it from the
General Plan Update p-o -sr and the private rather than
publi< golf course.
MOTION: Councilmember Brown move. anc Councilmember Harper seconded
a motion to deny the request of (AL ..rige.t- Development Corporation.
The voice vote was unanimous.
11.F. Consider Renaming Paul „_;: ,_Griffin, Sr. Park Staff
recommended they be directi,l i; deemed appropriate.
Phil Newhouse, Director c.)f Community Services advised that,
at the Council's direction tnis item was referred to the
Parks and Recreation ,'c,r,mi.ssion which has unanimously
recommended that the name Pail E Griffin, Sr. Park not be
changed.
Councilmember Harper adva.red that when the County named
Griffin Park, he objected tecat..se he felt it was a myth that
developers donate land fci�- -�a ^ -1 s -- that land is paid for by
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California February 21, 1990
those people who buy homeB in the surrounding tract(s).
Councilmember Harper stated that Griffin Homes engaged in
campaign fund laundering with total disregard for what may
happen to their employees Or :he candidates and that he did
not want a public facillt to be named after a company that
willfully engages in iLle(..Iril actin, sties.
Mayor Lawrason commented tN at he failed to see the correlation
between the name of Pau',. „ . Griffin, Sr. Park and the FPPC
fine. Councilmember Bri,wn advised that other community
members, not in attendance supported the renaming of Griffin
Park. Councilmember Per ez noted that although he was
personally injured by Gr.ittir.'s recent actions, he supported
retaining the name c.f 11aul E. Griffin, Sr. Park.
Councilmember Montgomery a},olog.izea to the Griffin family for
having to defend their name c:i the 'Paul E. Griffin, Sr. Park.
MOTION: Councilmember Browr mcred and Mayor Lawrason seconded a
motion to retain the name of Pau E. Griffin, Sr. Park. The motion
carried, with Councilmember Ha-1•r dissenting.
The Council recognized F'a
appreciation of the Counc
family desired to share #
sign, and wanted to pay tc
the park. He advised than
with the Parks and Recreat
,1 Griff.L.n, Jr. who expressed his
1 s action and advised that his
the cost. of moving the monument
one of the facilities going into
,is family would be willing to work
DI :�omm,.ssion to accomplish this.
11.J. Clarify Council Direction_ Concerning Processing Martin V
Smith & Associates APP 1,..ication for a Proposed Hotel
Restaurant Complex and Associated Apartment Complex on an
Industrial Zoned Property.;,:,ocated at the Northeast Corner of
Spring Road and Flynn Avf.,;aue >taf f recommended they be
directed as deemed appro n ite
City Manager Kueny requesi.'d clar-fication as to the timing
of the map and Conditional "ise Permit for the hotel; and the
General Plan Amendment fc r her prorc>sed multi- family project.
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the coc_Gcj_l clarified the intent of their
action on January .17, 1990, wtcict ,,ras to process the Conditional Use
Permit and General Plan Amenc.mc: r c °c rcur c ent ly.
11. K. City Finances
In response to questions b( ng raised by the public regarding
park funds and bookkeepim practices, Councilmember Harper
recommended that the Counc l hold a workshop for the purpose
of providing an opportunit for concerned citizens to express
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California
February 21, 1990
themselves directly to the Council Questions posed that can
be answered on the spot. wail be. For those questions
requiring research, a sec =nd workshop would be held in order
to respond.
In response to the City Manager's request to hold the workshop
in two weeks to allow staff ample time to produce related
documents for the public'.; perusal, the Council expressed its
desire to hold the meet. it soon as possible, within one
week.
MOTION: Councilmember Harper ,owed and Councilmember Montgomery
seconded a motion to hold a town hall meeting on February 28, 1990
for the purpose of allowing the public to air their concerns
regarding the City's finances, hc:- okkeeping practices and park funds.
The voice vote was unanimous.
ll.A. Consider Authorization to Loan Funds to Caltrans to Construct
Improvements at Southeast Corner of Spring Road /Los Angeles
Avenue /High Street Instersection. Staff recommended that the
Mayor be authorized to s ic_ • *-he Mo l 1.
City Manager Kueny advi..,ed that there is no additional
information from Caltrans -3irn�e tte Council's discussion on
February 7, 1990.
Councilmember Brown expressed reluctance to fund the project
with no guarantee from Galt rans that the money will be repaid.
Councilmember Harper advi -sed that he felt it was a relatively
modest amount to pay to amend a nagging problem, and it is
possible that the City wi- get pa:.d back.
City Manager Kueny suggested that the Council consider
requesting Caltrans to borrow $40,000 (for the intersection
improvement project) from the $150,000 Caltrans has already
funded for the Continuz>us Left Turn Project in the Virginia
Colony area, which will no be under construction for several
months. In this way, Cal rans will be borrowing from funds
already committed to a Mc, :hrpark project and can pay itself
back when the money becomes available; and the City can
proceed with the improvements, at the southeast corner of
Spring Road, Los Angeles T,•erua am High Street.
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the l.,uncil determined to request that
Caltrans use funds from the ;15C 000 airE�ady committed to the Left
Turn Project to fund the improven,,�nts for she intersection at Spring
Road, Los Angeles Avenue and Hg St -eet; funds to be paid back by
Caltrans for the Left Turn Pr)-1-? 1,oYer the funds become available.
Minutes of the City Council 1.
Moorpark, California February 21, 1990
ll.B. Consider Status Report Regarding PBR's Progress Associated
with the Carlsberg Specific Plan. Staff recommended they be
directed as deemed appropi Latc,.
Pat Richards, Director or ;ommunity, Development, reviewed the
Staff's written status re, or+.
The Council recognized A, .en Camp (One Boardwalk, Thousand
Oaks), representing Carlst -Irg, whc made the following points:
1. Stressed that the environmental document for the
Specific Plan shoul( be comprehensive enough, based on
the highest and bes use level of development on that
property, so as tc) il-,.(,w the fullest opportunity for
flexible considerat,)n It Ls a precautionary measure
to assess the proje r; of thE, highest and best use and
base the environmental iocument on that assessment so
that the project. ha t "1E mo: „t. flexibility.
2. Because there is crc school site designation in either
Alternative 1 -A or iternative 1 -B, it will be placed
in an area where lo°- ire currently designated.
3. The contract obllgat >s the City to act on this Specific
Plan by August. He axpresseo concern with the delay in
getting the envi coriar , :�nt.& l rE sport underway.
The Council recognized Ror,
that the environmental doc.
could locate on either e
document should include b(
so that units could be )i
school district.
rankersley (Carlsberg) who advised
went sho..ild address that the school
two sites and the environmental
h SLtes in the alternative project
Lt an t lie site not chosen by the
AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING, Mayor ] awrason declared a recess, the time
being 11:40 p.m. The meeting reccn o�ned at the hour of 11:55 p.m.
Pat Richards, Director of ommunity Development, advised that
Staff recommends Alterna °;..ve 1 -A to be the project, and
Alternative 1 -B to be thE^ ternat ve project for purposes of
environmental assessment::
Councilmember Harper advis-d that lie supported identification
of the school site that ias been confirmed by the School
District as the site. Cc nciimember Brown advised that she
supported Alternative !s the rroject.
City Attorney Kane advisea %hat for purposes of planning, the
Council should consider , h( -r. ,s(as of the proposed school
Minutes of the City Council 1
Moorpark, California February 21, 1990
site. She noted that the :.chool District is not bound by land
use designations and, therefore, the Council should provide
a land use in the event tt, school does not choose that site.
MOTION: Councilmember Brown m,>ved and Councilmember Montgomery
seconded a motion to adopt Alternative 1-A as the project, with the
preferred school site identifies! and with the additional option of
residential being used on that ,-p'
City Attorney Kane advise! that the environmental document
analyzes potential land uses and one project must be
identified. The motion or the floor identifies two uses of
a single site, and only ne project can be identified for
purposes of the environmeir'a.. assessment.
MOTION WITHDRAWN:_ Counci-mer. >ei Brown withdrew her motion;
Councilmember Montgomery witted: -, Iis second.
Allen Camp suggested tt.::.,:: -esi,iential be the level of
intensity on both locati.
City Attorney Kane advise,. that alternatives to the project
are developed to look at. In ,jests that have less environmental
impact. than the identifier( project
Councilmember Harper suggested that both sites be identified
as residential in the l oject.; and the school site be
considered as an alterrta, :, e t: the project.
MOTION: Councilmember Harper mov -d and Councilmember Brown seconded
a motion to approve Alternative ; -A as �r.he project; and to direct
PBR to analyze as the first alts- rnative, 1 -A with the school site
as identified by the Moorparkc ':J :..fiend School District; the second
alternative, an all residential arojer..t of 690 dwelling units as
would be allotted under current ,r.i,igo and the third alternative,
no project. No action was taker :r :he notion at this time.
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the C >, c:a. determined to table this item
until later in the meeting.
12.A. Consider Adoption of urinance No. 123, an ordinance
pertaining to the regulati I o~ solid waste.
Council discussion includ +•d the desire to change Section
6.10.100 a) for residenti.a collection to begin at 7:00 a.m;
to change Section 6.10.10 b) for commercial collection to
begin at 8:00 a.m. on Satui days; to limit container size to
45 gallons; and to coven b inket e!nroachment permits as part
of the franchise agreemert -a,-het han the ordinance.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California
February 21, 1990
City Manager Kueny advised that it would be necessary to
continue allowing 55 galloi containers, currently supplied by
the refuse companies, until the refuse companies exchanged
them for 45 gallon containers. Other than those supplied by
the refuse company, 55 gal :)n containers would not be allowed.
CONSENSUS: By consensus, the Council directed Staff to revise the
ordinance in accordance with the -harges out lined, and bring it back
for Council action.
ll.C. Consider Report From the Planning Commission Regarding Zone
Change No. Z90 -1 - Proposed Rezoning of R -1 and R -E Zoned
Properties to RPD (Residential Planned Development) at Various
Citywide Locations. Staff recommended that the Planning
Commission and Staff be 3 r-ec-t ed as deemed appropriate.
MOTION: Councilmember Brown , nov -1 and Councilmember Harper seconded
a motion to direct. Staff to prepare an ordinance cancelling the
current moratorium in effect for �,racant P -1 and R -E zoned properties
for adoption at the Council's ne >r. regular- meeting on March 7, 1990;
and to amend the City Zoning C(::ce t. , require that a Planned
Development Permit be obta._nec., fo.;- a] i residential development
consisting of five (5) or more 91 c,airate 1 )ts or dwelling units. The
voice vote was unanimous.
ll.E. Consider Attendance at drt in Nature Workshop in Santa
Barbara, April 26, 27 28. St:aff recommended they be directed
as deemed appropriate.
MOTION: Councilmember Brown mo,, —d and Councilmember Perez seconded
a motion that $90 be appropriate -:i from Account 01- 1148 -632 for the
attendance of Parks and Recreat i,; rz commissioner Teresa Radich at the
Art in Nature Workshop in Saiti ia:rtara Ln April, 1990. The voice
vote was unanimous.
ll.G. Consider Names for Community Center Meeting Rooms (A -Room and
M -P Room) . Staff recorrunended approval of the names as
submitted by the Parks a,ic Recreat Lon Commission.
MOTION: Councilmember Brown move tand Councilmember Harper seconded
a motion to continue this item ThE vo ,,e vote was unanimous.
ll.H. Consider Adopting Policy a:�d Procedures for Naming City -Owned
Parks. Staff recommen(lod appr -)ving the Resolution as
submitted.
MOTION: Councilmember Harper nc>vec and Councilmember Montgomery
seconded a motion to contiiu- *._his i °-em.. The voice vote was
unanimous.
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California February 21, 1990
U.I. Consider Authorization for Additional Engineering Services to
Perform a Plan Check of Freeway Interconnect Design. Staff
recommended approval of ar.iiticnal Service Authorization No.
90 -01„
In response to Councilmemier Harper "s concern regarding the
lack of a seismic analysis in the plan check of the Freeway
Interconnect design, City °Manager Kueny recommended that the
City Engineer be authorize) to move forward on its review of
the project plans for the Sate Highway 118/23 Connection, and
Staff will bring back a co,t e_timate for a seismic analysis.
MOTION: Councilmember Harper mc,v-d and Councilmember Brown seconded
a motion to approve the Additional Services Authorization No. 90 -01
for an amount not -to- exceed >4,, 0 and to direct Staff to report
back regarding a cost estimate I`( se smi: analysis. The voice vote
was unanimous.
12.B. Consider Adoption of Ordinance No. _124. A proposed ordinance
amending the City's zonin code to change certain property
from RE -5 Acre to RE -1 Acr (L- itunski).
City Attorney Kane rear (r rnaice No,. 124 in title only.
MOTION: Councilmember Brown m, ved and Councilmember Montgomery
seconded a motion to waive furthe reading and declare Ordinance No.
124 read for the second time. T -= v,)ice vote was unanimous.
MOTION: Councilmember Brown n .•ed and Councilmember Montgomery
seconded a motion to adopt OrdG_r.ince No. 124. The motion carried
with Councilmembers Harper and F- -ez dissenting.
In response to concern that the motion on the floor may be in
conflict with the agreemer, between the City and Carlsberg,
City Attorney Cheryl Kane advl_sed that the City is legally
bound by the May, 1988 su�,mit?.al.; and recommended that the
Council hold a Closed Sess n beforcr proceeding on this item.
14. CLOSED SESSION
MOTION: Councilmember Harper m,ved and Councilmember Montgomery
seconded a motion to adjourn to Closed Session under Agenda Item
14.B. - Potential litigation pursuant tc Government Code Section
54956.9 (b) (1) . The voice vote w, , ar:aninious.
The time of adjournment C.�osed Session was 12:55 a.m.
Those attending the `losed Session included all
Councilmembers; Steven Kaany„ Cit} Manager; Pat Richards,
Director of Community Di- opment and Cheryl Kane, City
Minutes of the City Council 15
Moorpark, California February 21, 1990
Attorney.
The meeting reconvened intc open session at the hour of 1:10
a.m. Attorney Kane advisee there was no action to report as
a result of the Closed SesS -,on..
11.B. con't. Consider Status Report Regarding PBR's Progress
Associated with the Carlsberg Specific Plan. Staff
recommended they be - rected is deemed appropriate.
MOTION WITHDRAWN: Councilmemb,r Harper withdrew his motion;
Councilmember Brown withdrew her - eccnd.
MOTION: Councilmember Montgomer;: moved and Councilmember Harper
seconded a motion to identify the ;.project t.o be analyzed as 1 -A with
one change -- that the 55 acres :n the southeast quadrant be one
acre rather than 1/2 acre, for a oiiximum of 55 units; that the first
alternative be the Carlsberg :u�mis3i0n of May, 1988; that the
second alternative be an all res den7.ia1 project as it relates to
current zoning and not current l.,s ? us?; a d the fourth alternative,
no project. The voice vote was -ia i no is
13. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
In response to a request rom the Moorpark Unified School
District, Councilmember Harper- requested that the Council's
Cable T.V. Committee consi er the School District's request
for Cable T.V. coverage ,heat it negotiates the City's
contract.
14. CLOSED SESSION:
MOTION: Councilmember Harper me -,ed and Councilmember Montgomery
seconded a motion to adjourn to Closed Session for discussion of the
following items: 14.A. - Personr.el; 14.B. - Potential litigation
pursuant to Government Code Sectic: 545 +56.'3 (b) (1) ; 14.C. - Potential
litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(c); 14.F. -
Litigation concerning City of W orpz:.rk vs. Fedelety Corporation
(Arroyo Vista Park); 14.G. - Lit- gation concerning Ventura County
Community College District vs. Cil.,of Moorpark; 14.H. - Litigation
concerning the County of Ventura s city ,�f Moorpark; and 14.I. -
Litigation concerning Rosenkrantz Is. Cit °, of Moorpark. The voice
vote was unanimous.
The time of adjournment to c used session was 1:16 a.m. Those
attending the closed sessic, were ail Councilmembers; Steven
Kueny, City Manager; Cheryl {anF, City Attorney; and Richard
Hare, Deputy City Manager
The Meeting reconvened int: )pen session at the hour of 2:01
Minutes of the City Council
Moorpark, California February 21, 1990
a.m.
MOTION: Councilmember Brown mowed and Councilmember Montgomery
seconded a motion to re- adjourn o a Closed Session for discussion
of Agenda Item 14.D. - Litigati n concerning City of Moorpark vs.
Moorpark Unified School Distri,,t The voice vote was unanimous.
The time of re- adjournment into Closed Session was 2:04 a.m.
In attendance at the :lased session were all City
Councilmembers; Steven Ki,e 1, City Manager; Cheryl Kane, City
Attorney; and Richard flair-'t Deputy City Attorney.
The Meeting reconvened inn open session at the hour of 2:10
a.m. City Manager Kueny i(I ised the=re was no action to report
as a result of the Closet ession.
15. ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION: Councilmember Harper ir:ved and Councilmember Montgomery
seconded a motion to adjourn thr meet:inki at the hour of 2:11 a.m.
The voice vote was unanimous
Pail W. Lawrason Jr., Mayor
ATTEST:
Lillian Kellerman, City Clerk
MINUTES OF TttE CITY COUNCIL
Moorpark, California February 21, 1990
A Special Meeting of the :ity Council of the City of
Moorpark, California was held on February 21, 1990, in the
Council Chambers of City Hal. of said City, located at 799
Moorpark Avenue, Moorpark, -.[A fornia.
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Lawrason called he meeting to order at the hour
of 6:47 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL:
Present: Councilmembers Brown, Harper, Montgomery,
Perez and Mayor Lawrason.
Steven Kueny, City Manager; Cheryl Kane,
City Attorney; and Pat Richards, Director
of Community Development.
3. CLOSED SESSION:
MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember
Montgomery seconded a motion to adjourn into Closed
Session under Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1)
concerning potential 11tigati,3n• The voice vote was
unanimous.
The time of adjournment to Closed Session was 6:48
p.m. In attendance at:. the Closed Session were all
Councilmembers; Steven Kueny, City Manager; Cheryl
Kane, City Attorney; ind . Pat. Richards, Director of
Community Development,
The Meeting reconvened into open session at the hour
of 7:11 p.m. City Manager Kueny advised there was no
action to report as a iesult of the Closed Session.
4. ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember
Perez seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting at the
hour of 7 :12 p.m. The voice vote was unanimous.
Paul
ATTEST:
Lillian Kellerman, City Clerk
W. Lawrason Jr., Mayor