Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1990 0404 CC REG ITEM 09D an r .. MOORPARK ITEM PAUL W. LAWRASON,Jr. ,>a" STEVEN KUENY Mayor oo��=ry City Manager SCOTT MONTGOMERY F � , CHERYL J. KANE Mayor Pro Tem w4,4h City Attorney ELOISE BROWN �lta/4.,�`V� PATRICK RICHARDS,A.I.C.P. Councilmember Director of CLINT HARPER, Ph.D. °0°7 Community Development Councilmember ''Eo R. DENNIS DELEngineer T BERNARDO M. PEREZ City Engineer Councilmember JOHN V. GILLESPIE LILLIAN KELLERMAN Chief of Police City Clerk MEMORANDUM RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community Development DATE: March 20, 1990 (CC meeting of April 4, 1990) SUBJECT: INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. IPD-89-2 Backclround On February 5, 1990, IPD-89-2 was heard before the Planning Commission. At that time, the matter was continued to allow the applicant to work out design issues with staff and the residential property owners located directly to the east of the proposed industrial building. The following is a summary of the issues and actions taken at that hearing: 1. Condition No. 13 needed to reflect the M-1 zone. This change to the condition of approval has been made. 2 . Reduce the height of the building to 20 feet. The applicant indicated a willingness to reduce the height of the building to 20--feet. The revised elevations were prepared; however, an error was made and the elevations showed a height of 21-feet. The applicant was unaware of the error and indicated that the intent was to have a building height of 20- feet and that the plans would be revised to reflect the 20- foot maximum height. 3. There was concern that the existing gas pump with underground storage tank that may or may not be located on this property could have contaminated the soil. It was recommended that a condition of approval be added to the project to have the soil sampled. In response, Mr. Annotti has obtained a permit from the Ventura County Department of Environmental Health which will address any contamination of soil. The "Permit To Abandon Underground Hazardous Material Storage Tank" requires the removal of any contaminated soils. 4 . It was recommended that on Condition No. 57 concerning the removal of graffiti, that the graffiti removal be changed 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529-6864 from "within 30-days from written notification by the City of Moorpark" to "within 5-days from written notification from the City of Moorpark. " This change has been made to the conditions of approval. 5 . The possibility of increasing the 30-foot landscaping along the eastern property line was discussed. In a discussion with the applicant, the applicant stated that a reduction in the number of parking spaces would not give him the necessary flexibility needed as various tenants may require different parking requirements . 6 . There was a recommendation that the walkway located along the eastern elevation of the building should be moved from the building to allow for a planting area adjacent to it. In response, the applicant has requested that the planter area remain in it's present location. A letter dated February 16, 1990 was received from John K. Innes, Landscape Architect who requests that the larger planting space as shown on the plan be retained on the basis that it provides the best screening opportunity between the proposed industrial building and the existing residences to the east of the proposed project. 7 . Surrounding residential property owners were concerned about having a 6-foot wall from their property lines and the alignment of the proposed wall . On March 12, 1990, staff met with Mr. Annotti on this issue. As a result of the meeting staff prepared the following condition which should address this issue: "That a 6 ' high wall measured from the maximum height of the grade within 5 feet of the property line shall be installed prior to final inspection for receipt of Certificate of Occupancy. Prior to construction of the wall, the residential homeowner shall determine the location of the wall . The same materials shall be used for the wall from lot to lot. Discussion On March 19, 1990, the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council approval of the Negative Declaration prepared for the project, adoption of the findings contained in the staff report dated February 5, 1990 . and approval of IPD-89-2 subject to the following recommendations to the City Council: 1. That the 4 parking stalls located at the northeast portion of the plot plan be removed and replaced with landscaping. 2 . That the location of the sidewalk along the eastern elevation of the building be placed in an area that would allow the proposed landscaping to visually blanket out the building from the residential uses to the east of the proposed L industrial project and that mature trees be placed along the landscaping area between the proposed industrial building and the existing residential uses . 3 . The geotechnical report should address the potential for liquifaction and for groundwater testing for contamination from the underground fuel storage tanks . Although the following was not made as a formal recommended condition, the Planning Commission is recommending that City Council give some consideration towards the following: That a condition of approval be placed on the project requiring that Los Angeles Avenue be widened from Maureen Lane to Park Lane and that the traffic signal at Los Angeles Avenue and Maureen Lane be installed prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for the construction of the building. This is the same type of condition deleted by the City Council for recent approved Industrial Planned Development Permits . Staff Recommended Action 1. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 of the Public Resources Code of the State of California beginning with Section 21000) , the City Council of the City of Moorpark approve the Negative Declaration prepared for IPD-89-2 . 2 . That the City Council adopts the findings contained in the staff report dated February 5, 1990, and said report is incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth. 3 . That the City Council hereby directs staff to prepare a Resolution to be presented at the next City Council meeting conditionally approving IPD-89-2 subject to compliance with all the conditions of approval as recommended by the Planning Commission less the condition regarding certain Los Angeles Avenue street improvements . Attachments: 1. Staff Report to Planning Commission (meeting of 2/5/90) 2 . Supplemental Staff Report to Planning Commission (meeting of 3/19/90 3 . Planning Commission Resolution 4 . Revised Site Plan and Elevations dated March 29 , 1990 DORPARK, CALIFORNIA City Council Meeting of f,/ 19942 ACfOOONNf qy .47v(GY RESOLUTION NO. PC-90- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. IPD89-2 Whereas, at a duly noticed hearing on March 19, 1990, the Planning Commission considered the application file by Annotti and Petrilli, requesting approval of an Industrial Planned Development for a one-story industrial building which will contain 32,650 square feet and be built on a 77,223 square foot parcel, located in the area of Kazuko Court and Poindexter Avenue in the City of Moorpark. The Assessor's Parcel Number is 511-0-070-720. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission after review and consideration of the information contained in the Staff Report dated February 5, 1990 and the Negative Declaration, has found that the proposed industrial building will not have an adverse impact on the environment, and has reached a decision in the matter; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of March 19, 1990, the Planning Commission opened the public hearing, took testimony from all those wishing to testify and closed the public hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 of the Public Resources Code of the State of California) , the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark recommends to the City Council approval of the Negative Declaration. SECTION 2 . The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council: a) adoption of the findings contained in the Staff Report dated February 5, 1990 and b) approval of IPD89-2 subject to the recommended conditions of approval and the following additional recommendations: PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE FOR THE BUILDING, THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT: 1. That the 4 parking stalls located at the north east portion of the plot plan be removed and be replaced with landscaping. 2 . That the location of the sidewalk along the eastern elevation of the building be placed in an area that would allow the proposed landscaping to visually blanket out the building from the residential uses to the east of the proposed industrial project and that mature trees be placed along the landscaping area between the proposed industrial building and the existing residential uses. ATTACHMENT 3 3 . The geotechnical investigation report should address the potential for liquifaction and for groundwater testing for contamination from the underground fuel storage tanks. SECTION 3. That the City Council should consider a condition of approval to be placed on the project requiring that Los Angeles Avenue be widened or that the traffic signal at L.A. Avenue and Maureen lane be installed prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for the construction of the building. SECTION 4. That at its meeting of March 19, 1990, the Planning Commission took action and recommended approval of a Resolution with attached conditions, said resolution to be presented at the next scheduled hearing. The action with the foregoing direction was approved by the following role call vote; AYES: Commissioners Lanahan, Talley, Woznial, Schmidt, and Scullin; NOES: None; ABSTAIN: None; ABSENT: None PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 2nd DAY OF APRIL, 1990 Chairman presiding: John Wozniak ATTEST: Patrick J. Richards Director of Community Development ITEM _adz._ • MOORPARK PAUL W. LAWRASON,Jr. STEVEN KUENY Mayor F° �� City Manager MONTGOMERY CHERYL J. KANE SCOTT � �� Mayor Pro Tem ✓�� �� ` City Attorney ELOISE BROWN ;�S j'� I PATRICK RICHARDS,A.I.C.P. Counalmember o �� �7. Director of .�� Community Development CLINT HARPER, Ph.D. o°q�� „�^• Cauncilrriember �° �`' R. DENNIS DELZEIT BERNARDO M. PEREZ City Engineer Counaimember JOHN V.GILLESPIE Chief of Police LILLIAN KELLERMAN City Clerk City of Moorpark RICHARD T. HARE Planning cnr1Ti`.si-on Meeting of= City Treasurer February 5, 1990 STAFF REPORT SECTION 1 - GENERAL INFORMATION A. HEARING DATE: B. wpmTIl : February 5, 1990 7:00 p.m. C. HEARING IDCATICN: D. CASE 243.: City Council Chambers Industrial Plarned 799 Nborpark Ave Development Permit No..(2 Moorpark, CA. 93021 D. STAFF C;D i1 r: F. APPLICANT: Paul Porter Anmitti and Petrilli Senior Planner 5000 N. Parkway Calabasas #101 Calabasas, CA. 91302 G. Pfd Pl UECTi The applicant has requested an Industrial Planned Development Pernit fora 24-foot high, one-story industrial building. The building as proposed will contain 32,650 square feet and be built on a 77,223 square foot parcel. Approximately 16 8 (5,500 square feet) percent of the gross floor area is proposed for office and 83.2 percent (27,150 square feet) is designated for manufacturing use. ATTACHMENT I_.�_ 799 Moorpark.Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529-6864 ' INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.: NPD-89-2 APPLICANT: Annotti/Petrilli DARE: February 5, 1990 page -2- H. PR JECT IOCATICN: The proposed Industrial Planned Development is located on a parcel of land which presently improved with an existing single family dwelling in the area of Kazuko Court and Poindexter Avenue, City of Moorpark, County of Ventura. The Assessor's Parcel number is 511-0-070-720. SPT CO I I HI H e;� V- S(ic -. PA OMAN AV M/O I E Q 1 • . i .r I I x Q a -I- - _> - a 4 uss(x I .. a AV W.Q I a I TEJED _< - O -'I •'1 ( A(SIa i3_ I R 3 i , LOS Av ANGELES I`me AV y i 111W IW j /^\_ 1m it iw YI IA)HS uI<Vau AV all Cr I. APP ICATfCN NEl) : January 3, 1990 Processing Expiration date: July 3, 1990 J. iEQUESIED ACTICN AND STAFF RIDATICIl: 1. Open the public hearing and accept public testimony. 2. Review and consider the information in the Negative Declaration. 3. Make the appropriate findings. (See Exhibit A) 4. Direct staff to prepare a Resolution regarding the Industrial Planned Development Permit recaa:lending approval of the Negative Declaration for IPD89-2 and recommending that the City Council certify that the information was considered on decisions related to the project at the Planning Camnission's next regular hearing of February 19, 1990. 5. Direct staff to prepare a Resolution for the Industrial Planned Development Permit recommending approval of IPD89-2 for one industrial building to the City Council for adoption at the Planning CamLission's regular meeting of February 19, 1990. INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.: IPD-89-2 APPLICANT: Annotti/Petrilli DATE: February 5, 1990 page -3- ALTERNATE PLANMWC aNassID N ACTIQS: 1. Denial of the requested entitlement and no action on the Negative Declaration. SECTION II - PROJECT ME BACKGROUND A. SITE ZCNI/C: M-1, Industrial Park District B. SITE GENERAL PLAN: I-1, Light Industrial C. VICINITY ZQffi8G: North: 14-1 (Industrial Park District) and R-E (Rural Exclusive) South: M-1 (Industrial Park District) East: R-1-8(Single Family Residential 8,000 square foot minimum) West: M-1 (Industrial Park District) D. VICINITY CORAL PLAN: North: I-1 (Light Industrial) and M (Medium Low Density) South: I-1 (Light Industrial) East: M (Medium Law Density) West I-1 (Light Industrial) E. PROJECT SPIE HISTORY: None. F. EXISTING SEflUG_: The proposed project is bordered to the west and south by industrial development, to the east by single family dwelling and by industrial and residential uses to the north. There is an existing single family dwelling presently located on the property. A tree report prepared for the property prepared by John R. limes identifies existing trees and a house which is schematically shown on the Tree Site Plan. The site Plan prepared by Reston-Red and Associates was used to determine that trees No. 7 and 8 can be preserved within the planter area. All other trees will be removed. In addition to the eight trees shown, there are four declining Peach Trees, ranging in size from 2" to 8" in diameter. The estimated value of the trees to be removed is $25,600. ' ' INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. : IPD-89-2 APPLICANT: Annotti/Petrilli DATE: February 5, 1990 page -4- SECTION III - PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A. PROJECT PROPOSAL/ REQUIREMENTS; The total building area of IPD89-2 is 32,650 square feet. A summary of the development proposed is provided below. The City of Moorpark requirements are provided for purposes of comparison. Proposed Project City Requirements Land Area 77,223 sq. ft. 10,000 sq. ft. Building Area, Total 32,650 sq. ft. Office Area 5,500 sq. ft. Manufacturing Area 27,150 sq. ft. Site Coverage 42.2% Parking, Total 78 73 Regular 76 71 Handicapped 2 2 Loading 2 2-semi-truck spaces Landscaping, Gross 18,479 sq. ft. 10% of total site 23.9% Parking Area Landscaping 10,413 sq. ft. 10% of parking area SETBACKS: The proposed setbacks are consistent with City Requirements for ;nduttrial developments as required by Zoning Ordinance No. 74. The setbacks for the project are: Front setback: Minimum 20 feet. Side yard: For interior lots there shall be a minimum thirty (30) foot setback one one side, while the other side may have a zero lot line, except when next to an R-zone, in which there shall be a thirty (30) foot setback. Said setback may be used for landscaping, driveways, parking or authorized outdoor storage. All proposed setbacks exceed the requirements rrents of the City of Moorpark. C. HEIGHT: The building as proposed is a one-story single user industrial structure with an approximate height of 24 feet. The M-1 zone allows a maximum height of 30 feet, with an increase to 60 feet allowed with a corresponding increase in yard space of one foot for each additional foot in height. Thus, the proposed building height is consistent with City requi remnts for industrial development. INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. : IPD-89-2 APPLICANT: Annotti/Petrilli DATE: February 5, 1990 page -5- D. PARKING: There are 76 standard parking spaces with two handicapped parking spaces proposed for the industrial building. The required parking for the industrial office use is one space for 300 square feet of gross floor area and one space for each 500 square feet of gross floor area for manufacturing and processing. Based on these City requ rents, the project has 5 additional parking spaces. Thus, the project contains sufficient parking as required by the City's Zoning Ordinance. The requirement for off-street loading zone spaces for industrial buildings is 2 Semi-truck spaces for industrial uses with a gross floor area in excess of 30,000 square feet. Based on this reqpirement, the proposed project's provision of two loading spaces is adequate. E. ACCESS: Access to the proposed industrial building will be by a driveway located at the end of a cul-de-sac (Razuko Lane) . The access will have a 50' radius curve and will be approximately 32 feet wide. F. LANDSCAPE: The Ventura County (Bide to Landscape Plans recam ends that a minimum of ten percent of the entire site be landscaped. The proposed project will have a landscape coverage of 10,413 sq. ft. in the parking area and 8,066 sq. ft. outside of the parking area for a total of 18,479 sq. ft. or 23.9%. Thus the project exceeds the City's requirements for landscaping. G. A%HITI ALD TICK: The industrial building is proposed to be a concrete structure with a raised metal roof. The walls will be tan colored with a heavy sand blasted finish, the bard of which will be smooth with a brown accent color. The front entrance of the structure will have textured concrete with bronze glass and an aluminum frame. The textured concrete will have a fractured groove finish. A 12' by 14' roll up door will be located to the west elevation of the structure. The roof height will be below the height of the parapet to alleviate rooftop mechanical equipment from being visible. A condition of approval is proposed to require a parapet to ensure that rooftop equipment will not be visible has been imposed. All onsite signage will be subject to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance. I NU[BTTaAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.: IPI -89-2 APPLICANT: Annotti/Petrilli DATE: February 5, 1990 page -6- H. ME E Wr ii THE SORROW= LAND: The development of this industrial building will be within an existing i nriustrial park. However, the structure will be adjacent to residential land on a portion of the north and east boundary. The proposed industrial building is consistent with existing and planned land uses in the area and as such is viewed as an appropriate location for industrial development. A 30 foot landscape buffer will be provided between the proposed industrial building and the residential property located along the eastern boundary of this parcel. The building will be painted tanwith dark bran trim to provide an aesthetiratly pleasing view auntie the adjacent residential uses and them will be a 6 foot wall with a split face finish provided along the property lines which will be painted the same color as the building. An issue has been brought up by one of the surrounding property owners that there might be air space between the proposed wall of this property and fences and/or walls of the luno nding residential properties. To help satisfy this concern, a condition of approval has been placed on this project requiring that all property walls be no further than one inch from any property line. I. LI(3II'IId4 The project has been conditioned to provide a lighting plan for all exterior lighting that will be prepared by an Electrical Engineer. The lighting plan shall achieve the following objectives: Avoid interference with reasonable use of adjoining properties, minimize onsite and offsite glare, provide adequate onsite lighting, limit electroliers height to avoid excessive illumination, and provide structures which are con'patible with the total design of the proposed facility. Any proposed fixtures shall be required to provide sharp cut-off qualities with a maximum of cne-half foot candle illumination at property lines. J. PUBLIC I VEL4 i1S: Staff rerds that the applicant be required to execute a covenant running with the land to participate in the formation of an underground utility assessment district, or other financing technique which the City of Moorpark could implement or adopt. The purpose of this action is to allow for the urid_rgrouni;ng of utility lines in the City of Moorpark. This action is desired by the City for purposes of aesthetics, safety, and equipment maintenance. The applicant has also been conditioned to execute a covenant running with the land on behalf of itself and its successors, heirs, and assigns agreeingto participate in the formation of an assessment district or other financing technique including, but not limited to, the payment of traffic mitigation fees, which the City may implement or adopt, to fund public street and traffic irovaments directly or indirectly affected by the development. ' INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT ND.: IPD-89-2 APPLICANT: Annotti/Petrilli DATE: February 5, 1990 page -7- SECTION IV - CONFORMAN2E WITH THE GENERAL PLAN The requested Industrial Development Permit is consistent with the City of Moorpark Land Use Element of the General Plan. In particular, the following industrial policies are considered applicable to the proposed project. Policy 2: To encourage industrial development to adopt a harmonious architectural style with appropriate landscaping and buffer areas. Discussion: IPD89-2 proposes a pleasing architectural style and utilizes a combination of techniques to make the building ca:patible with the surrounding residential uses such as the use of landscaping buffer, 6 foot high split face finish tan wall, a heavily tan colored sand blasted finish building with a brown accent ribbon around the building, and bronze glass and bronze aluminum frame with textured concrete along the entrance area. Policy 5: In order to discourage strip industrial development, future industrial facilities should be in the form of industrial parks. Discussion: IP389-2 is part of a developing industrial park. Policy 6: To establish site for appropriate industrial uses in locations which are harmonious with adjoining land urea, and which do rot degrade the general physical environment of Moorpark. Discussion: The project site is within an area zoned and planned for industrial uses. As previously discussed in this staff report, the project has been designed to minimize impacts to the environment. SECTION V - ANALYSIS A. WITH CITY POLICIES, ZMIG, AND GENERAL PLAN: IPD89-2 is consistent with the City of Moorpark General Plan Land Use Element which designates the site for I-1 (Light Industrial uses) . The M-1 zoning is consistent with the General Plan Land Use designation. The proposed project complies with the City of Moorpark's requirements for setbacks, parking, landscaping, and loading zones. B. OPAL ( DNDEENS: The project is not expected to result in significant environmental impacts. Potential impacts related to grading and erosion, flood hazard, noise, light and glare, hazardous materials, traffic, and air quality are discussed in the enviroiu:tsital document. All concerns are addressed through the imposition of the attached standard conditions of approval. INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVEt OPMENP PERMIT NO.: IPD-89-2 APPLICANT: Annotti/Petrilli DATE: February 5, 1990 page -8- C. AGENCYREVIEW: Agencies and Departments which reviewed IPD89-2 include the County Fire Department, CalTrans, Environmental Health, Air Pollution Control District, City Police Department, City Engineer, Moorpark Unified School District, and Water Works District No. 1. Staff has included the proposed conditions generated through the agency review as conditions of approval for the project. SHCTI( i NI - STAFF REOMMENDATICN That the Planning Cannission direct staff to draft a Resolution for IPD89-2 to be considered at the next regular meeting of February 19, 1990, recommending that the City Council approve the Negative Declaration. and Industrial Planned Development Permit No. IPD89-2 with Conditions of approval. Prepared by: • . _. by: Pc 1. Paul Porter ,atrick J Richards, AICP Senior Planner ,'irector Of Community Development IFeb4b Date ' MISTRIAL PLANNED DEVEIOPNEWP PERMIT NO.: IPD-89-2 APPLICANT: Annotti/Petrilli DATE: February 5, 1990 page -9- SECTION-VII 9-SECTION VII - EEEDDIP15 1. Findings 2. Conditions of Approval 3. Negative Declaration 4. Initial Study 5. Site Plan 6. Elevations 7. Conceptual rape Plan $. Tree Report INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.: IPD-89-2 APPLICANT: Annotti/Petrilli DATE: February 5, 1990 page -10- L FD INGS: IPO89-2 FEBRUARY 5, 1990 1. NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR IPD89-2: a. The Negative Declaration/Initial Study is complete and has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Anality Act (CEQA) GOiriolines, and City Policy. b. The contents of the Negative Declaration/Initial Study have been considered in the various decisions on this project. 2. INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. IPD89-2: a. The proposed industrial use would be consistent with the purpose, intent, guidelines, standards, policies, and provisions of the City's General Plan and Chapters 1 and 2 of the Ordinanc.�e Code. b. The proposed industrial use would not impair the integrity and character of the zone in which it is to be located. c. The proposed industrial use would be canpatible with land uses permitted within the General Plan land use designations and the zone in the general area where the use is to be located. d. The proposed industrial use would not be obnoxious or harmful or impair the utility of the property itself or neighboring property or uzcz. e. The proposed industrial development would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare. f. The proposed project, together with the provisions for its design and improvements, is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed project is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan. g. The Planning Commission has considered the effect of its action upon the housing needs of the region and has balanced these needs against the public service needs of its residents and available fiara1 and environmental resources. EXHIBIT 1 INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT ND.: IPD-89-2 APPLICANT: =VI PI & PETRI LI DATE: FEBRUARY 5, 1990 Page -1- DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNTTY DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS ( tAL RHQUWD : 1. The permit is granted for the land and project as shown on the submitted plot plans and elevations. The location and design of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved plot plans and elevations except or unless indicated otherwise herein. 2. The development is subject to all applicable regulations of the x4 Zone and all agencies of the State, Ventura County, the City of Moorpark and any other governmental entities. 3. That unless the project is inaugurated (building foundation slab in place and substantial work in progress) notlater than one year after this permit is granted, this permit shall automatically expire on that date. The Director of Crmm,n;ty Development may, at his discretion, grant up to one(1) additional year extension for project inauguration if there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if applicant can document that he has diligently worked towards inauguration of the project during the initial one year period. 4. All facilities and uses other than those specifically requested in the application are prohibited unless a modification application has been approved by the City of Moorpark. 5. The design, maintenance, and operation of the permit area and facilities thereon shall comply with all applicable requirements and enactments of Federal, State, County, and City authorities, and all such requirements and enactments shall, by reference, become conditions of this permit. 6. No conditions of this entitlement shall be interpreted as permitting or requiring any violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized governmental agency. In instances where more than one set of rules apply, the stricter ones shall take precedence. 7. If any of the conditions or limitations of this permit are held to be invalid, that holding shall not invalidate any of the r na;n;ng conditions or limitations set forth. 8. The permittee agrees as a condition of issuance and use of this permit to defend, at his sole expense, any action brought against the City because of issuance (or renewal) of this permit or in the alternative to relinquish this permit. Permittee will reimburse the City for any court costs and/or attorney's fees which the City may be required by the court to pay as a result of any such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of any such action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of his obligation under this condition. a:ipd892b EXHIBIT 2 4 INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.: IPD-89-2 APPLICANT: AMOTTI & PETRILLI DATE: FEBRUARY 5, 1990 Page -2- 9. A sign permit is required for all onsite signs to be approved by the Director of Ccmunity Development. Only one monument sign will be permitted which will be externally lit. No onsite building sign shall be permitted unless the building is occupied by a single reef. No offsite signs are permitted. 10. Prior to the submission of construction plan for plan check or initiation of any construction activity, a zoning clearance shall be obtained from the Community Development Department. 11. Prior to initial tenant occupancy and any subsequent change in tenant occupancy, the owner of the subject building, or the owner's representative shall apply for a zoning clearance frau the Crmmn,nity Development Department. 12. The Director of Community Development, or his designee, shall have the authority to conditionally approve or deny a zoning clearance request for tenant occupancy consistent with Article 45 of the Zoning Code. The cost of the zoning clearance shall be borne by the applicant for tenant occupancy. 13. If in the future, any use or uses are contemplated on the site differing from that specified in the zoning clearance approved for the occupancy, either the permittee, owner, or each prospective tenant shall file a project description prior to the initiation of the use. A review by the Director of Community Developient will be conducted to determine if the proposed use is catpatible with the M lone and the terms and conditions of this permit. Said review will be conducted at no charge to the applicant and an approval letter sent, unless a minor or major modification to the Industrial Planned Development is required, in which race all applicable fees and procedures shall apply. 14. The penmittee's acceptance of this permit and/or commencement of construction and/ or operations under this permit shall be deemed to be acceptance of all conditions of this permit. PRIM TO ISSUANCE (V A ZQNU1C C[ERRAZCE, THE flUMIt CfCITIQiS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 15. The final construction working drawings shall shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development for review. 16. Complete landscape plans ( 2-sets), together with specifications and a maintenance program shall be prepared by a State Licensed Landscape Architect, generally in accordance with the Ventura (gide to Landscape Plans and in compliance with the City of Moorpark Ordinance No. 74, and shall be submitted to and approved by the Director of Community Development. The final landscape plans shall be in substantial conformance with the conceptual landscape plan suhmitted with the application. The applicant shall bear the total cost of the landscape plan review and final installation inspection. The landscaping and planting plan sutmitted for review and approval shall be accompanied by a deposit as specified by the City of Moorpark. Additional funds may subsequently need to be deposited to cover all landscape plan check and inspection fees. All landscaping and planting shall be accanplished and approved by the Director of Community Development, or his designee, prior to the approval of occupancy. The project landscape plans shall include the following: INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.: IPD-89-2 APPLICANT: ANND'ITI & PFTRI= DATE: FEBRUARY 5, 1990 Page -3- a. A 50 percent shade coverage shall be provided within all parking areas. Shade coverage is described as the maximum mid- day shaded area defined by a selected mpwLimen tree at 50 percent maturity. b. Any turf plantings associated with this project shall be drought tolerant, low water using variety. c. Landscaping at site entrances,exits, and any intersection within the parking lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated driver frau another moving vehicle or pedestrian. d. Plantings in and adjacent to parking areas shall be contained within raised planters surrounded by six-inch high concrete curbs. e. landscaping shall be designed so as to not obstruct the view of any exterior door or window frau the street. f. landscaping (trees) shall not be placed directly under any overhead lighting which could cause a loss of light at ground level. g. Earthen berms shall be provided to screen views of parked vehicles from access roads. h. Landscaping shall be used to screen views of any baciflow preventers. 17. Roof design and construction shall include a minimum 18-inch extension of the parapet wall above the highest point of the roof. 18. All roof mounted equipment (vents, stacks, blowers, air conditioning equipment, etc.) that may extend above any parapet wall shall be enclosed on all four sides by view obscuring material. Prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance, the final design and materials for the roof screen and location of any roof mounted equipment must be approved by the Director of Carninity Development. 19. All trash disposal areas shall be provided in a location which will not interfere with circulation, parking or access to the building, and shall be screened with a six foot high wall enclosure with metal gates. The final design of the trash enclosure shall be subject to the issuance of a zoning clearance. 20. Pullover parking (overhangs) shall be limited to 24 inch maximum. No vehicles shall be allowed to encroach onto walkways or into the required landscaped setbacks along roadways. 21. A 45-foot turning radius shall be provided for loading zones consistent with the AAS[ ) WB-50 design vehicle. Prior to issuance of a zoning clearance, the applicant shall provide a site planwhich identifies all loading truck turning movements. INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.: IPD-89-2 APPLICANT: AXE= s PEPRILLI DATE: FEBRUARY 5, 1990 Page -4- 22. All property line walls shall be no further than one inch from the property line. 23. The building shall be constructed using energy saving devices. These shall include those devices required by the California a Actin;n i strative Code, Title 24. 24. For all exterior lighting, a lighting plan shall be prepared by an electrical engineer registered in the State of California and submitted to the Department of Community Development for review and approval. The lighting plan shall achieve the following objectives: Avoid interferences with reasonable use of adjoining properties; minimize onsite and offsite glare; provide adequate onsite lighting; limit electroliers height to avoid excessive illumination; and provide structures which are compatible with the total design of the proposed facility. 25. The lighting plan shall include the following: a. A photometric plan showing a point-by-point foot candle layout to extend a minimum of twenty (20) feet outside the property lines. Layout plan to be based on a ten (10) foot grid center. b. Maximum overall height of fixtures shall be twenty (20) feet. c. Fixtures must possess sharp cut-off qualities with a maximum of one-half foot candle illumination at property lines. d. There shall be no more than a seven-to-one (7:1) ratio of level of illumination shown (maximum-to-minimum ratio between lighting standar;s) . e. Energy efficient lighting fixtures shall be provided which are compatible with adjacent properties. f. Average maximum of ore-half foot candle illumination. g. No light shall be emitted above the 90 degree or horizontal plane. 26. A utility man with common access to house all meters and the roof access 1atirlcr shall be provided. No exterior access abler of any kind shall be permitted. 27. No downspouts shall be permitted on the exterior of the building. 28. All exterior building materials and paint colors shall be approved by the Director of Connunity Development to ensure canpatibility with adjacent development. The accent stripe shown on the elevations shall have an indentation of at least ore-half inch deep. 29. No asbestos pipe or construction materials shall be used without prior approval of the City Council. INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.: IPD-89-2 APPLICANT: ANN= & PETRIILI DATE: FEBRUARY 5, 1990 Page -5- 30. All utilities are required to be placed underground to the nearest off-site utility pole except through transmission lines. Prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance, the applicant shall submit a plan for review and approval to the Director of Community Development which identifies how con pliance with the undergr un i=ng requiranent will be met. 31. If skylights are proposed, the specific type and model must be approved by the Director of Community Development to ensure that they shall be of an opaque type to minimize evening illumination as viewed from the exterior. 32. The applicant shall contribute to the City of Moorpark $.25 per square foot of gross floor area to support the City's current and future park system. 33. The applicant shall contribute $10 per each 100 square feet of building area to the City of Moorpark's Art in Public Places Fund. 34. Prior to issuance of a zoning clearance, the permittee shall make a contribution to the Moorpark Traffic Systems Management Fund of $.15 per square foot of floor area to fund Traffic System Management programs. 35. To encourage employees to use alternative means of transportation to reduce automobile trips, camion area bicycle storage facilities such as bicycle racks or lockers shall be provided. Proposed bicycle storage areas and facilities for the industrial building shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Caauunity Development prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance. 36. Prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance for tenant occupancy, the proposed use shall be reviewed and approved by the Ventura County Environmental Health Division to ensure that the proposal will comply with all applicable State and local regulations related to to storage, handling, and disposal of potentially hazardous materials, and that any required permits have been obtained. If required by the County Environmental Health Division, the applicant shall prepare a hazardous waste minimization plan. 37. All roof mounted equipment and other noise generation sources onsite shall be attenuated to 55 BBA. at the property line, or to the ambient noise level at the property line measured at the time of the occupant request. Prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance for initial occupancy or any subsequent occupancy, the Director of Cammnity Development may request that a noise study be submitted for review and approval which demonstrates that all onsite noise generation sources would be mitigated to the required level. The noise study mist be prepared by a licensed acoustical engineer in accordance with accepted engineering standards. 38. Prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance, a Surety Performance Bond in the amount of $10,000 shall be filed and accepted by the Director of CanmuLity Development. The Director of Community Development, may, through a public hearing to be heard before the City Council recamend that any or all of the funds in the Performance Bond be forfeited for n ncarplian a of the Conditions of Approval or for same other just cause. This condition shall automatically be superseded by a related resolution or ordinance regarding condition compliance for entitlement approvals adopted by the City Council. INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.: IPD-89-2 APPLICANT: ANN ITI & PFTRIrLI DATE: jC FEBRUARY 5, 1990 o \ \a \ \ Page 111 (1'.5S1 .}S lY,t, 3't 39. That prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance the applicant shall a Tree Removal Penni from the Community Development Departmment,ans3-sttn 1-Maty the Citi-- of- erpark'$2S,60A4 -trees-being--revved which shall be placed into a fund for future landscaping throughout the City. PRIOR 40 THE IS.SLP,idZ OF A BUILDING PERIII'T, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHBid, BE SATISFIED: 40. An "Unconditional Will Serve Letter" for water and sewer service will be obtained from the Ventura County Waterworks District Na. 1. 41. The applicant shall pay all school assessment fees levied by the Moorpark Unified School District. 42. If any archaeological or historical artifacts are uncovered during excavation operations, the permittee shall assure the preservation of the site; shall Obtain the services of a qualified archaeologist to recommend proper disposition of the site, and shall obtain the Director of Cammunity Development's written occurrence of the recatmerxied disposition before resuming develop:tent. 43. Should human burial retains be encountered during any grading or excavation activities, the peanittee shall cease operation and shall notify the Cannity Development staff. Following notification, the permittee shall obtain the services of a qualified archlogical consultant and Native American Monitor who shall assess the situation and recaamend proper disposition of the site. PRIOR TO QOCDWANCY THE PCBILWUC CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED 44. All parking areas shall be surfaced with asphalt or concrete and shall include adeg:ate provisions for drainage, striping and appropriate wheel blocks, curbs, or posts in parking areas adjacent to landscaped areas. 45. All landscaping and planting shall be installed and inspected. 46. Na use for which this permit is granted shall be commenced until a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued by the Building and Safety Division. In addition, no Certificate of Occupanoy shall be issued until all onsite improvements specified in this permit have been completed or the applicant has provided a Faithful Performance Bond. Said onsite improvements shall be crntpleted within 120 days of issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. In ca-Se of failure to comply with any terns or provision of this agreement, the City Council may by resolution declare the surety forfeited. Upon completion of the required improvements to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development, the surety may be exonerated by action of the Director of Community Development. 47. At the time water service connection is node for each project, cross connection control devices shall be installed for the water system in accordance with the requirements of the Ventura County Environmental Health Department. INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. : IPD-89-2 APPLICANT: AN!C1'IZ & PETRILLI DATE: FEBRUARY 5, 1990 Page -7- AFTER ISSUANCE OF A =MIME OF OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS SHALL BE APPLICABLE: 48. No later than ten (10) days after any change of property ownership or change of lessee(s) or operator(s) of the subject building, there shall be filed with the Director of Conmu:ity Development the name(s) and address(es) of the new owner(s), lessee(s) or operator(s) together with a letter from any such person(s) acknowledging and agreeing with all conditions of this permit. 49. Reference Condition No. 11 which requires that prior to initial occupancy or any subsequent change of tenant occupancy, the owner of the subject building, or the owners representative shall apply for a zoning clearance from the Camnuiity Development Department. The purpose of the zoning clearance shall be to determine if the proposed uses(s) are compatible with the zoning and terms and conditions of the permit. 50. Prior to occupancy by any tenant or subsequent owner whose business would employ or dispose of hazardous materials, a Major Modification approval shall be required. 51. The continued maintenance of the permit area and facilities shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The permittee shall be required to remedy any defects in ground maintenance, as indicated by the Code Enforcement Officer within thirty (30) days after notification. 52. The striping for parking spaces and loading bays shall be maintained so that it remains clearly visible. 53. No outside storage of any materials or overnight parking of any semi-trucks or truck trailers beyond the loading zones shall be permitted. 54. No repair or maintenance of trucks or any other vehicle shall occur outside of the industrial building. 55. Loading and unloading operations shall not be conducted between the hours of 10:00p.m. and 6:00a.m. 56. No noxious odors shall be generated from any use on the subject site. 57. The applicant and his successors, heirs, and assigns shall remove any graffiti within thirty (30) days from written notification by the City of Moorpark. All such graffiti removal shall be accomplished to the satisfaction of the City. CITY ELCIINEER CONDITIONS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF zczmc CIMIANC E, THE FOIL me CONDITIONS SHALL BE SATISFIED: 58. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a grading plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer; shall obtain a grading Permit; and shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion. INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. : IPD-89-2 APPLICANT: ANNDTTI & PETRILLI DAZE: FEBRUARY 5, 1990 Page -8- 59. The applicant shall submit to the City of Moorpark for review and approval, a detailed Soils Report certified by a Registered Civil Engineer in the State of California. The grading plan shall incorporate the recommendations of the approved Soils Report. 60. The applicant shall prepare a geotechnical investigation with regard to liquifaction, expansive soils, and seismic safety. Per the City's Safety Element, this report shall be prepared by a Registered Professional Civil Engineer or Geologist. 61. The applicant shall construct one driveway frim Kazuko Court onto the subject property. The driveway shall be constructed per Ventura County Road Standard Plate E-1, and shall be approximately 30' wide. 62. The applicant shall conduct 24 hour directional traffic counts on all legs of the intersections of Los Angeles Avenue with Goldman Avenue and Maureen Lane. These counts shall then be used to conduct a traffic signal warrant analysis. This information shall then be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval to enable the City to keep abreast of the changing traffic patterns in this industrial area and to anticipate the approximate time a signal will be warranted. For this reason, the warrant study shall also identify occupied facilities within the tributary area as of the traffic count date. 63. The applicant shall demonstrate for each building pad to the satisfaction of the City of Moorpark as follows: a. Adequate protection from 100-year frequency storm. b. Feasible access during a 10-year frequency stone. 64. Hydrology calculations shall be per current Ventura County Standards. 65. The applicant shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the Los Angeles Avenue Improvement Area of Contribution. The actual deposit shall be the then current Los Angeles Avenue Improvement Area of Contribution applicable rate at the time the building permit is issued. 66. The applicant shall indicate in writing to the City of Moorpark, the disposition of any water well(s) and any other water that may exist within the site. If any wells are proposed to be abandoned, or if they are abandoned and have not been properly poled, they must be destroyed per Ventura County Ordinance No. 2372. 67. The applicant shall execute a covenant running with the land on the behalf of itself and its successors, heirs, arra assigns agreeing to participate in the formation of an assessment district or other financing technique including, but not limited to, the payment of traffic mitigation fees, which the City may implement or adopt, to fund public street and traffic i prints directly or indirectly affected by the development. INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. : LPD-89-2 APPLICANT: ANNdI'TI & PEiRULI DATE: FEBRUARY 5, 1990 Page -9- 68. All haul routes shall be approved by the City Engineer and shall be limited to graded areas only. 69. The applicant shall offer to dedicate to the City of Moorpark for public use, all the public streets right-of way shown on the approved tentative map. 70. If any of the improvements which the applicant is required to construct or install is to be constructed or installed upon land in which the applicant does not have title or interest sufficient for such purposes, the applicant shall do all of the following at least 60 days prior to the filing of the final or parcel map for approval pursuant to Governmental Code Section 66457. a.. Notify the City of Moorpark (hereinafter "City") in writing that the applicant wishes the City to acquire an interest in the land which is sufficient for the purposes as provided in Governmental Code Section 66462.5. b. Supply the City with (i) a legal description of the interest to be acquired, (ii) a map or diagram of the interest to be acquired sufficient to satisfy the requirements of subdivision (e) of Section 1250.310 of the Code of Civil procedure, (iii) a current appraisal Lurt prepared by an appraiser approved by the City which expresses an opinion as to the fair market value of the interest to be acquired, and (iv) a current Litigation Guarantee Report. c. Enter into an agreanent with the City, guaranteed by such cash deposits or other security as the City may require, pursuant to which the applicant will pay all of the City's cost (including, without limitation, attorney's fees and overhead expenses) of acquiring such an interest in the lard. DOME CONSTRUCTICN, TBE PCSdL1 ] 3 commas SMALL CCMPI,Y: 71. That prior to any work being conducted within the State or City right-of-way, the applicant shall obtain an Encroachment Permit from the appropriate agency. 72. If any hazardous waste is encountered during the construction of this project, all work shall be ;Mately stopped and the Ventura County Environmental Health Department, the Fire Department, the Sheriff's Department, and the City Inspector shall be notified immediately. Work shall not proceed until clearance has been issued by all of these agencies. 73. No trees with a trunk diameter in excess of four inches shall be trimmed or raroved without prior approval of the City Council. 74. If grading is to take place during the rainy season, an erosion control plan shall be submitted for review and approval along with the grading plan. Along with the erosion control measures, hydroseeding of all graded slopes shall be required within 60 days of completion of grading. 75. During construction of this project, the developer shall take all necessary action to guarantee that dust control shall be maintained so that dust frau the project site shall not bother the hares adjacent to this project. INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVECAPMENP PER IIT NO.: IPD-89-2 APPLICANT: ANNC R TI & PFTRI LI DARE: FEBRUARY 5, 1990 Page -10- M ORPARK POLICE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS PRIOR W 7.8E ISS OF A OCCUPncr Pffi*IIT, 78E PCHIDWG CONDITIONS SHALL BE MET: 76. Lighting devices shall be high enough so as to eliminate anyone on the ground from tampering with them. All parking areas shall be provided with a lighting system capable of illuminating the parking surface with a minimum of one-half foot candle of light and shall be designed to minimize the spillage of light onto adjacent properties. All exterior lighting devices shall be protected by weather and breakage-resistant covers. 77. Landscaping shall not cover any exterior door or window. 78. landscaping at entrances/exits or at any intersection within the parking lot shall not block or screen the view of a seated driver frau another moving vehicle or pedestrian. 79. landscaping (trees) shall not be placed directly under any overhead lighting which could cause a loss of light at ground level. 80. All entrance/exit driveways shall be a minim m+ of 30 feet in width. 81. All exterior doors shall be constructed of solid wood core, a miniminn of 1 and three quarters inches thick, or of metal construction. Front glass doors cnucnrly used for entry are acceptable, but should be visible frau the street. 82. Doors utilizing a cylinder lock shall have a minimum five (5) pintumbler operation with the locking bar or bolt extending into the receiving guide a minimum of 1-inch. 83. There shall not be any easy exterior access to the roof area, i.e. ladders, trees, high walls, etc. 84. If an alarm system is used, it shall be wired to all exterior doors and windows and to any roof vents or other roof openings where access may be made. 85. Address shall be clearly visible to approaching emergency vehicles and mounted against a contrasting color. The numbers shall be a minimum of 6 inches in height and illuminated during the hours of darkness. 86. Front door entrances shall be visible frac the street. 87. Directory boards indicating locations of the various buildings and indiviriNial units shall be displayed at each entrance to the complex and lighted during the hours of darkness. DURING C MM:3M i 78E Fazamc CCWITIONS SBALL APPLY: 88. A licensed security guard is reccr nerd d during the construction phase, or a 6-foot high chain link fence shall be erected around the construction site. 89. Construction equipment, tools, etc., shall be properly secured during nonworking hours. hours. INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVEDDPMEN1' PERMIT NO.: IPD-89-2 APPLICANT: ANNDTTI & PETRILLI DATE: FEBRUARY 5, 1990 Page -11- PRIOR '10 OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLOWING CONDITION SHALL BE SATISFIED: 90. Upon occupancy by the owner or proprietor, each single unit in the industrial development, constructed under the same general plan, shall have locks using combinations which are interchange free from locks used in all other separate proprietorships or similar distinct occupancies. awry OF VEN1URA ENVIIROMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS PRIOR '10 OCCUPANCY, THE FOLLCWIIG OCNDITIONS SHALL BE MET: 91. Z[enants that produce hazardous wastes shall obtain a permit from the Ventura County Environmental Health Department. 92. The storage, handling and disposal of potentially hazardous materials from future tenants shall be in compliance with applicable State and local regulations. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CIEARAICE, THE FCIImwc CONDITION SHAM, BE SATISFIED: 93. Prior to issuance of a zoning clearance or other similar approval for tenants (new or changed uses), a detailed project description questionnaire should be submitted to the Ventura County Envirowantal Health Department for review and approval. VENTURA O0r FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE, THE FOEWflG CONDITIONS SHALL BE SAIL ED: 94. Any structure greater than 5,000 square feet in area and/or five miles from a fire station shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system in accordance with Ventura County Ordinance No. 14. 95. If the building is to be protected by an automatic sprinkler system, plans shall be submitted, with the payment for plan check, to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review and approval. 96. The applicant shall submit plans to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for approval of the location of fire hydrants. All existing hydrants within 300 feet of the development must be shown on the plan. 97. Building plans of all A, E, I, and H occupancies shall be submitted to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for plan check. INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO.: IPD-89-2 APPLICANT: ANNCTTI & PETRILLI DATE: FEBRUARY 5, 1990 Page -12- 98. Prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance, the Ventura County Fire Prevention must acknowledge that the most recently submitted plans meets their stan;ardds. Previously they mentioned that: a) The access on the Exhibit dated 8/30/89 for the subject project did not meet the Fire District standards. The dead end parking aisles must either be provided with standard fire apparatus turn-arounds, or be continued as a 25 foot aisle along the east side of the building. b) The indicated dimpster area on the exhibit dated 8/30/89 needs to be relocated. 99. That prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance, the applicant shall submit two site plans to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for approval of the location of fire lanes. The fire lanes shall be posted in accordance with California Vehicle Code, Section 22500.1 and Article 10 of the Uniform Fire Code Prior to Occupancy. PRIOR TO THE ISSN OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE FOLLOWING C 1)ITION SHALL BE SATISFIED: 100. If the building is to be protected by an automatic sprinkler system, plans shall be submitted, with the payment for plan check, to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for review and approval. 101. The applicant shall submit plans to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for approval of the location of fire hydrants. All existing hydrants within 300 feet of the development must be shown on the plan. 102. Building plans for all A, E, I, and H occupancies shall be submitted to the Ventura Bureau of Fire Prevention for plan check. 103. That prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance, the applicant shall submit two site plans to the Ventura County Bureau of Fire Prevention for approval of the location of fire lanes. The fire lanes shall be posted in accordance with California Vehicle Code, Section 22500.1 and Article 10 of the Uniform Fire Code prior to Occupancy. CITY OF MOORPARK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 799 MOORPARK AVENUE MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA 93021 X NEGATIVE DECLARATION MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION I . PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 1. Entitlement: Industrial Planned Development No. 89-2 2 . Applicant: Annotti and Petrilli 3 . Proposal : Construction of a 32, 650 sq. ft. industrial building. 4. Location & Parcel Number( s) : Terminus of Kazuko Court in the City of Moorpark. Assessor Parcel No. 511-0-070-720. 5. Responsible Agencies: None. II . STATEMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS: An initial study was conducted by the Community Development Department to evaluate the potential effects of this project upon the environment. Based upon the findings contained in the attached initial study it has been determined that this project could not, have a significant effect upon the environment. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ONLY: These potentially significant impacts can be satisfactorily mitigated through adoption of the following identified measures as conditions of approval . MITIGATION MEASURES INCLUDED TO AVOID POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS: Not applicable. III . PUBLIC REVIEW: 1. Legal Notice Method: Direct mailing to property owners within 300 feet. 2 . Document Posting Period: January 15, 1990 through February 5, 1990. Prepared by: Approved by: Paul Porter, Senior Planner Patrick J. Richards Director of Community Development Date EXHIBIT 3 Case No. : IPD89-2 Applicant: Annotti and Petrilli Staff Contact: Paul Porter, Senior Planner Attachment 1 Project Description The proposed industrial development is located on a 77,223 sq. ft. parcel of land located at the terminus of Kazuko Court in the City of Moorpark. The proposed project consists of a single story industrial building containing 5,500 sq. ft. of office space and 27, 150 sq. ft. of manufacturing area. Access will be provided from a driveway located at the cul-de-sac terminus of Kazuko Court. Parking would be provided onsite for a total of 78 parking spaces. EXHIBIT 4 a:pdipd892.doc �I . CITY OF MOORPARK INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND f} 1. Name of Applicant N pa 11 p,4 c-%� 2. Project Description (scc o a‘N. N.^ J 3. Date of Checklist submittal rta ileCt t��A �r 4. Project Location \QCN\N`1S 12-0C133-100C ' Cbu�\�w \3 14.\y . Y\aoccef\s �eisbc3 Qoa�\ Nv .S�\-O-alt-12.0 1 II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) YES MAYBE NO 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes — L in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? -t c. Change in topography or ground surface )C relief features? d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, Y either on or off the site? f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, �( or changes in situation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, • inlet or lake? g. Exposure of people or property to geologic X hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud- slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? 1 YES MAYBE NO 2. AIR. Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? - c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or 1_ temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? d. Is there a potential for cumulative adverse impacts on air quality in the project area? 3. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course of direction X of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, x or the rate and amount of surface runoff? c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood X waters? d. Change in the amount of surface water in . X_ any water body? e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any X alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of x_ ground waters? g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either X through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? h. Degradation of ground water quality? i. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? j. Exposure of people or property to water related y hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? 2 • YES MAYBE NO 4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in the diversity of species or number of X any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or X endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, _ X or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X 5. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? b. Restrict the range of or otherwise affect any X rare or endangered animal species? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife J1 habitat? 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? X 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural _ X resources? b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable A_ resource? YES MAYBE NO 10. RISK OF UPSET. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous x_ substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? 11. POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the location, x distribution, density or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, _ X or create a demand for additional housing? 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular X- movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation X systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? _ I f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, �( bicyclists or pedestrians? rt 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental servies in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? 1 b. Police protection? c. Schools? )( d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X— e. Other governmental services? 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? )( YES MAYBE NO b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources _ X of energy or require the development of new sources of energy? 16. UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: �/ a. Power or natural gas? b. Communications system? c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? _ x e. Storm water drainage? f. Solid waste and disposal? _ X g. Street lighting annexation and/or improvements? X_ 17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: / a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health V hazard (excluding mental health)? b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? 18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the obstruc- tion of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact x_ upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? 20. ARCHAEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL. Will the proposal: a. Affect possible unknown archaeological or historic- _ 3_ al sites? b. Result in destruction or alteration of a known archaeological or historical site within the vicinity of the project? c. Result in destruction or alteration of a known x_ archaeological or historical site near the vicinity of the project? S YES MAYBE NO 21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a: Does the project have the potential to degrade thequality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) — c. Does the project have impacts which are individu- ally limited, but cumulatively considerable?. (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where impact on ea .h resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is X significant.) - _ — d. Dogs the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. X III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIR ENTAL EVALUATION • (:5e2 a _\AMt IV. DETERMINATION. .11/ On the basis of this initial evaluation: In conformance with Section15060 of the State EIR Guidelines, I find with certainity that the proposal would not have a significant impact on the environment. I find the proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to class I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet could be applied to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION. SHOULD BE PREPARED. I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION. should be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet could be applied to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION SHOULD BE PREPARED. I find proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ADDENDUM to an existing certified Environmental Impact Report is required. I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and this effect is adequately addressed in a certified Environmental Impact Report, and thus SUBSEQUENT USE of the existing BIR is required. • Attachment 2 DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION lb & e. Construction of the proposed industrial building would require some displacement, compaction, and overcovering of the soil. Information provided in the Project Description Questionnaire indicates that excavated material will be recompacted and and that the height of the highest finished slope will be 5". Compliance with Building Code/ City Engineer requirements related to grading would minimize the potential for significant erosion impacts. A standard project condition of approval states that if grading is to take place during the rainy season, an erosion control plan shall be submitted for review and approval along with the grading plan to the City Engineer. Along with the erosion control measures, hydroseeding of all graded slopes is required within 60 days of completion of grading. 2a &d. Based on the Ventura County Air Pollution Control District's Guidelines for the preparation of Air Quality Impact Analyses, the proposed project is not expected to result in substantial deterioration of ambient air quality or significant cumulative air quality impacts. The referenced Guidelines indicate that a Negative Declaration is appropriate since the project would emit less than 13. 7 tons per year (tpy) of Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) and Reactive Organic Compounds (ROC). 3b. Construction of the proposed industrial building would change the absorption rate and the drainage for the project site. There are underground storm drains in the existing streets that were designed in conjunction with the industrial park subdivisions. Concrete drains would also be provided onsite. The applicant is required to submit a drainage plan to the City Engineer for review and approval and the applicant shall construct any necessary drainage facility. 3c &j. The subject property is classified as Zone B on the Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Control Insurance Rate Map for Moorpark. No alteration of the course of flood waters or exposure of people or property to significant flooding is expected. The applicant would be required to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, that the building pad will be protected from a 100-year frequency flood and feasible access during a 10-year flood. 4a &c. Trees would be removed as a result of the construction of the industrial building. Pursuant to the submitted tree report, a value has been placed on the trees to be removed. A condition of approval has been placed on the project for the applicant to reimburse the City for the value of these trees. a:ndipd892.doc w 5. The proposed project is not expected to change the diversity of species, affect any rare or endangered species, introduce new species, or result in the barrier to the migration or movement of animals. 6a &b. The proposed industrial building is not expected to increase the ambient noise level in the general area. The primary noise source in the area is from Los Angeles Avenue (Highway 118). The City's Noise Element identifies that up to 75 decibels of exterior noise is considered acceptable for industrial uses.. 7. The proposed industrial building would produce new light and glare. A standard condition of approval is that a lighting plan be prepared by an Electrical Engineer registered in the State of California. A lighting plan is required to achieve the following objectives: Avoid interference with reasonable use of adjoining properties (maximum of one-foot candle illumination at the property lines), minimize onsite and offsite glare, provide adequate onsite lighting, limit electroliers height to avoid excessive illumination and provide structures which are compatible with the total design of the proposed facility. The standard project condition would minimize any potential glare impacts. 8. The proposed industrial building will not alter the present or planned land use of the surrounding area. The proposed site is part of an existing industrial park. Also the existing M-1 zoning and general plan designation of I-1 (Light Industrial) is consistent with the proposed development. 9. The industrial building will not result in a substantial increase in the rate of use of any natural resource, nor substantially deplete any nonrenewable resource. 10. There is a potential that hazardous materials would be generated by a prospective user. To minimize the potential for environmental impacts, conditions of approval have been placed on the project similar to the following: o A Zoning Clearance shall be obtained prior to approval of initial occupancy or any subsequent change in tenant occupancy of the industrial building. o The Director of Community Development, or his designee, shall have the authority to conditionally approve or disapprove or deny any request for tenant occupancy. The cost of the tenant occupancy review shall be borne by the applicant for the tenant occupancy. o Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for occupancy, the applicant shall provide evidence that the Ventura County a:ndipd892.doc Environmental Health Division has reviewed and approved the proposed industrial use. o The storage, handling, and disposal of potentially hazardous materials shall be in compliance with the applicable State and local regulations. 11. The proposed industrial building will not substantially alter the location, distribution, density or growth rate of the population since the development is in an area planned and adequately zoned for the proposed use. Although the demand for additional housing would not be substantial, it is possible that the industrial building would create a demand for additional housing within the City of Moorpark. The number of dwelling units constructed each year in the City is controlled by the City's adopted Residential Development Management System. 13 a,c. Standard conditions to address any additional traffic proposed by the project has been attached to the Industrial Planned Development Permit by the City Engineer similar to the following: o Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance, the applicant shall execute a covenant running with the land on behalf of himself and his successors, heirs and assigns agreeing to participate in the formation of and be subject to any assessment district or other financing technique including, but not limited to the payment of traffic mitigation fees, which the City may implement or adopt, or fund public street and traffic improvements directly or indirectly affected by the development. o Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance, the permittee shall make a contribution to the Moorpark Traffic Systems Management Fund of $. 15 per square foot of floor area to fund Moorpark Traffic Systems Management programs. o The applicant shall conduct 24 hour directional traffic counts on all legs of the intersections of Los Angeles Avenue with Goldman Avenue and Maureen Lane. These counts shall then be used to conduct a traffic signal warrant analysis. This information shall then be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval to enable the City to keep abreast of the changing traffic patterns in this industrial area and to anticipate the approximate time a signal will be warranted. For this reason, the warrant study shall also identify occupied facilities within the tributary area as of the traffic count date. o The applicant shall deposit with the City of Moorpark a contribution for the Los Angeles Avenue Improvement Area of Contribution. The actual deposit shall be the then current Los Angeles Avenue Improvement Area of Contribution applicable rate at the time a building permit is issued. a:ndipd892.doc o All haul routes shall be approved by the City Engineer and shall be limited to graded areas. 14. According the the reviewing agencies, there have been no identified need for new or altered governmental services relating to fire or police protection, schools, recreational facilities, or other governmental services. The project has been conditioned to contribute to the City's current and future park system by contributing to the City of Moorpark $.25 per square foot of gross floor area. 15. The proposed industrial building will not use significant amounts of fuel or energy. 16. None of the reviewing agencies have identified a need for substantial alterations to utilities. 17. See No. 10. 18. The proposed industrial building is being proposed in an existing area that has been planned and is being developed for industrial uses. The structure is also being designed in such a fashion as to be compatible with the residential property adjacent to the industrial park by providing compatible colors on the building, setbacks, sufficient landscaping, and a 6 foot split face concrete wall. 19. See No. 14. 20. The site is not expected to affect archaeological or historical material. Standard conditions of approval have been placed on this development permit similar to the following : o If any archaeological or historical artifacts are uncovered during or excavation operations, the permittee shall assure the preservation of the site; shall obtain the services of a qualified archaeologist to recommend proper disposition of the site; and shall obtain the Community Development's written concurrence of the recommended disposition before resuming development. o Should human burial remains be encountered during any grading or excavation activities, the permittee shall cease operation and shall notify the Community Development Department staff. Following notification, the permittee shall obtain the services of a qualified archaeological consultant and Native American Monitor who shall assess the situation and recommend proper disposition of the site. a:ndipd892.doc i Eq . iIf i4 . �ej it \i-t-41 , 1 • it il � I t, - !- • ,<1 . `.. / • li b I U 1f I i . • u ��d� : V o L ° a i"3 i �it ::„.z. il 11 pj F 1.• t.• o Edi 1 r rr^^ t a Fi 4C '{ d n 1�Gn u LI \.___ _.7:': •'.=- .z H • � Y 1_141 �` (i ae.�w b Y Iy v .VI �. i A �' aria rate• }1 ,,. I 114 iii : 1 k hiI I�,I , EXHIBIT E 7 r Heston - Reed a — CzEl q and associates /1/4 t; - . I rre=-__i ws num. n.. .l.'el;orV & ''' `\* • \\ 111 ,,-...t _ f �. 0 ` --).-{ 1 L - 1 11 ` ______ L_I. • PI _ ._ 1 i 1 1 LT d ,, \f‘ 4. 6 \\ —"ZN,_` �- r= 2 _\ ---""7 P * • n ,7C r i ;-3 . irdi it g i 1 1 i --r ri // • 6' EXHIBIT 6 iiia 4 Heston - Reed Illfis a [C•grOR and associates eec.CAN/Y AV.NVs • 1WiiIII-11 , . F+ �Sd cpF • . O Orel . igt 6r : , • •1 fir Itt 8 I a,. F , , . • . ' ll >>J�. 4 �:;,• , , . ' ' a pi( �QI• .`.l\\ sit 1.• .is . c, $_ 1148kr 11/1 ! �` 1/4 �, �pp • • • i .p.o. ,,k) :1 : . ,• , nri • • • t fill id, • E I , I 'F t , s; L . , , ______,;i, ________ l R ,m4__ ��� i Ypn.yll $� d,. . . `a illi 'pis I • EXHIBIT 7 I 1 - 1 orP .XR.n MH PPOJ.CT "PV�PIONP "e ` f W „14i ANNOTTIOPETRELLI WAREHOUSE D O +e..N •. .... we. e 1'''� �J k.NOPcuP �wcwvoT ( L I t e. kPPuko Ione moorpPrk• 061110ml• I I ( uT w.r.woo trTwnn � . D' l TwoVP.M Ou s. C4 '""e✓+ PRELIMINARY PLAN Poe n•"me Ps i Is ' - • C f E� ANDSCIVT3E 1 DE .'4,.;.A:' ELOPMENT SPECIFICATI * NS PROJECT -11:z. 5T11 ol( ,z\H`-,(9 " -- LL1 'ICAT -' 1 ,i OOP16k<LIE02-1-1 IA CLIENT Ai*~:0':'-1 IS.c , 6 2 61A.--r--- - ,,,,,, r,6\12, _ii.,4,--r .6,6,_,2s.,, ,&,Aske 1,cL.„ A 9A\ 6 . . , . . . 0 JOl-4N K. !MMES - - INC. �o�AaoscgpFA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ��= �, � t jil — 497 W. FARGO STREET 41."-- 1 t4 574 w TI••lousa�vo oA�cs, ca. � � � 805 492.5844 � q�F p coo, EXHIBIT 8 C c • M JOHN K. INNES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, INC. C 497 W. Fargo St. Thousand Oaks, Ca. 91360 (805) 492-5844 Project: Annotti-Petrelli Industrial Building Moorpark, California Client: Annotti and Associates 5000 Parkway Calabasas, Suite 103 Calabasas, California: 91302 Site Data: The existing trees and house are schematically shown on the Tree Site Plan included within this report. The Site Plan prepared by Heston-Reedand Associates was used to determine that trees No. 7 and 8 can be preserved within the planter area. All other trees will be removed. In addition to the eight trees shown, there are four declining Peach Trees, ranging in size from 2"-8" diameter. Tree Species: Four tree species are addressed in this report. They are: Schinus molle (California Pepper) - These can be a useful screening or specimen tree in the landscape, but these three trees are declining and hazardous. Each is rate "C" for appearance and "D" for health. Juglans regia (English Walnut) - The walnut is never used ornamentally and does not adapt well from an orchard situation to landscape. Both of these individuals have borers and are in poor health and have been rated "C" for appearance and "D" for health. Acacia melanoxylon (Black Acacia) - This Acacia is a large, fast growing tree occasionally used where quick results are needed, particularly in a temporary situation. The fast growth is unfortunately accompanied by weak growth and an invasive root system. This tree has reached its peak and will soon begin its decline. Consequently the Acacia has been rated • "B" for appearance and "D" for health based on its anticipated decline. Pinus radiata (Monterey Pine) - Very fast growth makes this the most widely planted Pine in California. Unfortunately, most of these Pines die at an early age from insect and fungal attacks, although some very large specimens have survived along Highway fl8 between Moorpark and Camarillo. This tree is rated "B" for appearance and "C" for health. It can and should be preserved on site, although closely monitored for any change in health. As part of the preservation program it should be deadwooded and have the ivy removed. Citrus species (Orange) - Often used in home landscapes, none of the Citrus Trees are normally used in industrial areas due to the prolific fruiting. This tree is a good specimen, with an "A-B" rating and should be preserved. The landscape design needs to address this Orange and the Pine to ensure that watering is not greatly increased. Removals: Each of the trees to be removed is evaluated below utilizing the Guide for Establishing Values of Trees and Other Plants prepared by the Council of Landscape Tree Appraisers. This formula is used to determine the dollar value of trees beyond replacement size. • C r Size: Each trunk was measured at 54" above the ground to determine the diameter (see Site Plan) and then figure the cross-sectional area in square inches. This size multiplied by the current value of $27/square - inches equals the basic value -for each tree. Species: Each species is rated by I.S.A. for.a geographical region or zone which address how well this plant grows in each area. Moorpark is within the Southern California Inner Valley Zone which rates Schinus molle as 80%, Juglans regia as 60%, and Acacia melanoxylon at 20%. Condition: This rating is determined in the field by the evaluator and is a combination of the health and appearance grading AA=100%, BA=90%, BB=80%, CB=70%, CC=60%, CD=50%, and DD=40%. Location: This rating is a determination by the evaluator of a plants importance from an architectural, engineering, climatic and aesthetic viewpoint. Industrial areas have a rating range of 60%-90%, depending on its grading. Young Schinus molle would rate very highly here if properly placed, but these particular trees have been given the lowest rating of • 60% due to their hazardous, declining status. The Acacia and Juglans are likewise evaluated at the bottom end of this range. • Total Value: See final column of following chart for the total dollar value of each tree. - TREE # SIZE X BASIC VALUE X SPECIES X CONDITION X LOCATION - TOTAL VALUE 1 177 $27 = 4,779 60% 50% 60% $ 860 4: 416 $27 = 11,232 20% 65% 60% 876 3 1257* $27 = 33,939 80% 50% 60% 8,145 • 4 1257* $27 = 33,939 80% 50% 60% 8,145 ' 5 • 1018 . $27 = 27,487 . 80% 50% 60% 6,597 6 201 $27 5,427 60% 50% 60% • 977 • $ 25,600 *Actual size of trees No. 3 and 4 is 5281 and 1964 sq. in. based on 82-inch and 50-inch trunk diameters. But the I.S.A. has determined that unless a tree has historical value, sizes over 40 inches should not be used. Therefore, the 40-inch trunk diameter is used for these two trees. • Respectfully submitted, • Jo K. InnVeowegt,...----- .L.A. . dscape Architect No. 1432 J. .ry 27, 1989 . • *a\a�oj��tlaiO3j� DD8S•Z6D SOB *�� 'VD `SNVO ormvs 'IOH1 7,.�� Last:u S OOtlt7d 'M LSD r • •• _wain-mew acIVOSONV-1 � meg. � r'yd`3 3SCINd%ate` •ONI SENNI '?I NHOf❑ ----- .. r 107111 Hy' 14 -a1-1G " --AJ- 0 H.HON C ) ' I 2/47' 1..1 41iiihiot' -2/ICIK. 071M t NIC471 hrr.1-1 1 eN1.1hIx 0 - 141,1 �� _ _, it o © 1 CJV�1 11� Q e ISD 11f9 L. Ins-,m IpI 0 II den 4 II lia4 '},' zracicri • inbv 11z& 4 . O 'dl 9'h' 11Ql• Z I in ftWM „e4I I - &37-1-t-4-- Q1-4I.C4I) 001 . 12-1e*zz • j . ' MOORPARK PAUL W.LAWRASON,Jr. .�o,a STEVEN KUENY Mayor o �� City Manager SCOTT MONTGOMERY :VOW CHERYLJ. KANE Mayor Pro Tern �Pl��/��' City Attorney ELOISE BROWN 1$t1'y. &liame PATRICK RICHARDS,A.I.C:P. o Councilmember o` o Director of °•o% Community Development CLI_NT HARPER, Ph.D. • R. DENNIS DELZEIT ' Councilmember BERNARDO M. PEREZ City Engineer Councifinember JOHN V.GILLESPIE LIL_L__IAN KELLERMAN Chief of Police City clerk City of Moorpark RICHARD T.HARE Planning Commission Meeting (Al City Treasurer March 19, 1990 SUPPLEMENTAL STAFF REPORT OF IPD _ 89=2 Background On February 5, 1990, IPD 89-2 was heard by the Planning Commission;. At that time, the matter was continued to allow the applicant to work out design issues with staff and the residential property owners located directly to the east of the proposed industrial building. The following is a Summary of the issues and actions taken: 1. Condition. No. 13 needed to reflect the M-1 zone. This change to the condition has been made. 2 . Reduce the height of the building to 20-feet. The ,..' applicant indicated that revised "plans have been completed revising the height of the .building to :21-feet. The revised elevations were received by the Department of Community Development on March 12, 1990 and are attached for your information (See Exhibit 3) . 3. There was concern that the existing gas pump that may or may not be located on this property could have produced contaminated soil. It was recommended that a condition of approval be added to the project to have the soil sampled. In response, Mr. Annotti has obtained a permit from the Ventura County Department of Environmental Health which will addresses any contamination of soils. The "Permit To Abandon Underground Hazardous Material Storage Tank" is attached for your information. This permitting process "requires the removal of any contaminated Soils . 4 . It was recommended that on Condition No. 57 concerning the removal of graffiti, that the graffiti removal be changed from "within 30-days from written notification by the City of Moorpark" to "within 5-days from written notification from the City of Moorpark" . This change has been made to the condition. ATTACHMENT c2- 799 799 Moorpark Avenye Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529-6864 a 5 . The possibility of increasing the 30-foot landscaping along the eastern property line was discussed. In a discussion with the applicant, he stated that a reduction in the number of parking spaces would not give him the necessary flexibility needed as various tenants may require different parking requirements. 6 . There was a recommendation that the walkway located along the eastern elevation of the building should be moved from the building to allow for a planting area adjacent to it. In response, the applicant has requested that the planter area remain in it's present location. Attached is a letter dated February 16, 1990 from John K. Innes, Landscape Architect who requests that the larger planting space as shown on the plan be retained on the basis that it provides the best screening opportunity. 7 . Surrounding residential property owners were concerned about having a 6-foot high wall from their property lines and the assignment of the walls . On March 12, 1990, staff met with Mr. Annotti on this issue and have the following proposed additional condition of approval which should address the homeowner's concerns: "That a 6 ' high wall measured from the maximum height of the grade within 5 feet of the property line shall be installed prior to final inspection for receipt of Certificate of Occupancy. Prior to construction of the wall, the residential homeowner shall determine the location of the wall . The same materials shall be used for the wall from lot to lot. Recommendation Recommend to the City Council approval of IPD89-2 subject to any recommended changes . lP trick Ric •rds rector 0 Community Development Exhibits: 9 . Letter from John K. Innes, Landscape Architect dated 2/16/90 10 . Permit To Abandon Underground Hazardous Material Storage Tank 11. Revised Plans • 3 JOHN K. INNES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, INC. 497 W. Fargo St . Thousand Oaks , Ca. 91360 (805) 492-5844 February 16, 1990 City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, Ca, 93021 Attention: Mr. Richards Director of Community Development • Subject: Annotti-Petrelli Building, IPD 89-2 • Dear Mr. Richards, As landscape architect for this project, I must respond to the current discussion regarding screening along the east side. As you are aware, there will be a six foot high masonry wall along the property line,tthe _building sits:two feet lower than the adjacent residential lots, and has a:.thirty`foot• setback. As currently shown, there will be a five foot wide concrete sidewalk next to the building and the remaining twenty-five feet rather heavily planted with a mixture of large trees and shrubs. This arrangement provides the best possible landscape area for plant screen growth. If the walk were to be moved five ' feet away from the building, the resultant space could only receive narrow ' ..: plantings and the larger area would be reduced to twenty feet wide which would reduce the-effectiveness of that area. The smaller'strip plantings !' would probably never be seen over the-six foot high wall. Please consider these facts in your; final decision and retain the.larger planting space for the best screening opportunity. • If there are any questions, please call. • Respectfully su. ' ed, Jo K. Innes, .A. ,;. RECEIVED --- Lan•scape Architect No. 1432 FEB 2 2 1990 cc- Annotti • JxI/ii C•lty of Moorpark Exhibit 9 County of Ventura e Environmental Health Department �2j PERMIT TO ABANDON lo1 UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS MATERIAL STORAGE TANK TANK LOCATION: • 786I o,-.t/<-4-- x -/s/L /i)00/2/DA/2/L OWNER: CONTACT(Mos): ) J PHONE: A /b14170 Tri / 4/IA01 A/,.st�j[Z7-r7 • tis/S - ye�z�p/ ,59V MAILING ADDRESS/ Y,SOW City sl Zy Cod.): 'CKM4e. /0 rOOo t A,(2g14)/a I/ (7,1Z,--) e, (P4/4r?AsAs . 7/_.70 OPERATOR: j / CONTACT(Num): PHONE: 0(2)1/Ste , �:w //A/- /0 E2 - ./✓��t 4ii • 61 e- 32/8otc !Number.MAILING ADDRESS!Nund .Seine City end Zip Cod.):` re)Ce-) ✓:4,�c / , _/644 '/ (_,c)Li) c?4C,] c c_ -,c17 6,4 .tM'l4 .—?c--),7.___ S //. REMOVAL CONTRACTOR: CONTACT(Nast PHONE: 7 e Y/1Il/c�4- ///�I C/c� /C' OCC. c/5 8, - 7oc)9 CONTRACTrOR LICENSE NUMBER: rd 1/ ? 7- 2 e/z exia : !!/3u /1-0 MAILING ADDRESS(Numb.'.Stint.City end Zip Code): , 2f1P1/c-/ i1 PuJ &A4 t, . A,e/L- 8oS C4?Cts (; G WORKMEN'SCOMPENSATION IN RANGE COMPANY: /.,C /V_ 1/03 I2 O eye. 6/20/ 0 �/ PHONE: (41. // /4). ..,7A.15:e/. 7CA),} o U. / - 79st 7 S'7 S— TANK CONTENTS •NO. SIZE CONSTRUCTION (Steel, Fiberglass, etc.) PRESENT PREVIOUS 1. 6-:67 .. x 4 .0 71 /A) s r CL - d - 6-As 2. . 3. 4. 5. I plan to abandon this tank: 0 By Removal: 0 Tank will be rinsed first. Contractor: ❑ Tank will not be rinsed first. Contractor: 0 In Place (Allowed only if tank is under existing building or otherwise inaccessible.) Estimated Start Date: /h /C/ S / 770 Attach a Plot Plan Showing: 1. Location of all tanks, piping and secondary containment - - 2. Monitoring wells •-- • 3. North arrow 4. Property lines 5. Nearest intersetion or road ' SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE DATE FOR QfF/CE USE ONLY Fire Fee PERMIT STATUS: 3S1 Approved 0 Not approved Environmental Health Fee / ` TOTAL 4.0*._ EXPIRATION DATE: OS I?.oI90 Date Received . – At, -9 ( Received By �))� Check Number I— �� Receipt Number �j�710�1 C3 ' I t lv�+' yr 1`tNs o? ` U CU • (SEE REVERSE FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL) RMA-304(Rev.5/sal DISTRIBUTION: hie — rCanary — Contractor Pink — Applicant Goldenrod — Fire Dept. t x11ibiut County at Ventura UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS STORAGE TANK INSPECTION RECORD Date..r2. 2t) k ) Environmental Health Permit No.: «9� jj II654 2813 Fire Permit No.: Air Pollution Control Dist, Permit No.: 654.2801 Building Permit No.: Location: 11.y,p r-r-rtnt • Owen { t-Yltt-. • Contraaahit, t . F. - L c r,c4 /1 a 1,l 1 Ch POST TIOS CARD IN A CONSP CUOU$ r*.� INSPECTORS MUST SIGN ALL SPACES INSPECTIONS MUST BE REQUESTED 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE LNSTECTION DATE ' APPROVED BY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH: Permit • 27I44 L=a — Eiisting Tank Empty basting Tank Removed . Tank Hotdiinw Holiday Test Tank Pressure Test Piping Liner Piping Pressure Test Piping Layout/Slot* Overfill EIKtronit Monppr Final Approval FIRE DEPARTMENT: Penny • Shear Valves Emergency Shutoff Signs Extinguishers Final Approval APCD: Permit Final Approval BUILDING AND SAFETY: Permit Electrical Final Approval R/AA-/6-000001 is1*61• zF ,* 7'' ,, ..r ‘ - ?i: 41.::. . ., * * 1 EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 19, 1989, VENTURA COUNTY ORDINANCE CODE SECTION 4507 PROHIBITS ANY CLEANUP ACTIVITY AT AN UNDERGROUND TANK SITE WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF A CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN BY THE VENTURA COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT. CLEANUP INCLUDES THE REMOVAL OF CONTAMINATED SOIL BEYOND THE MINIMUM NECESSARY TO REMOVE THE UNDERGROUND TANKS AND PIPING. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDINANCE IS A MISDEMEANOR PUNISHABLE BY FINES AND JAIL FOR EACH DAY OF VIOLATION IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS ORDINANCE, PLEASE CALL THE UNDERGROUND TANK STAFF AT 805-654-3518. — \R-,\, P,)-- - il, hco , RESOLUTION NO. PC-90- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. IPD89-2 Whereas, at a duly noticed hearing on March 19, 1990, the Planning Commission considered the application file by Annotti and Petrilli, requesting approval of an Industrial Planned Development for a one-story industrial building which will contain 32,650 square feet and be built on a 77,223 square foot parcel, located in the area of Kazuko Court and Poindexter Avenue in the City of Moorpark. The Assessor's Parcel Number is 511-0-070-720 . WHEREAS, the Planning Commission after review and consideration of the information contained in the Staff Report dated February 5, 1990 and the Negative Declaration, has found that the proposed industrial building will not have an adverse impact on the environment, and has reached a decision in the matter; and WHEREAS, at its meeting of March 19, 1990, the Planning Commission opened the public hearing, took testimony from all those wishing to testify and closed the public hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 of the Public Resources Code of the State of California) , the Planning Commission of the City of Moorpark recommends to the City Council approval of the Negative Declaration. SECTION 2 . The Planning Commission recommends to the City Council: a) adoption of the findings contained in the Staff Report dated February 5, 1990 and b) approval of IPD89-2 subject to the recommended conditions of approval and the following additional recommendations: PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A ZONING CLEARANCE FOR THE BUILDING, THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT: 1. That the 4 parking stalls located at the north east portion of the plot plan be removed and be replaced with landscaping. 2 . That the location of the sidewalk along the eastern elevation of the building be placed in an area that would allow the proposed landscaping to visually blanket out the building from the residential uses to the east of the proposed industrial project and that mature trees be placed along the landscaping area between the proposed industrial building and the existing residential uses . ATTACHMENT 3 3. The geotechnical investigation report should address the potential for liquifaction and for groundwater testing for contamination from the underground fuel storage tanks. SECTION 3. That the City Council should consider a condition of approval to be placed on the project requiring that Los Angeles Avenue be widened or that the traffic signal at L.A. Avenue and Maureen lane be installed prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for the construction of the building. SECTION 4 . That at its meeting of March 19, 1990, the Planning Commission took action and recommended approval of a Resolution with attached conditions, said resolution to be presented at the next scheduled hearing. The action with the foregoing direction was approved by the following role call vote; AYES: Commissioners Lanahan, Talley, Woznial, Schmidt, and Scullin; NOES: None; ABSTAIN: None; ABSENT: None PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 2nd DAY OF APRIL, 1990 Chairman presiding: John Wozniak ATTEST: Patrick J. Richards Director of Community Development I1 saae!oosse pue •• , .I paaa - uoasap � � 1 a' / ii ® . !3 a: r'fj .7.L!--,-„, 3 I z4 J ti 4 a s t . 4 o-.a 3¢ 6 ,,/;,./ "- k o III 4 a a ob s _ __ - Ns; ,$: ATTACHMENT q •+v . . ms .Ma �I-3 - 41,? I t . ir---z=.-x.__-E.-=.-�-�=-cam ."••••••••:-......S00,...4+ sageoosse pue _ � a"11 peas - uoaseH I _ t 6 bias+ 1 -----arviv-F7 7 a S _ ti l O TI �1Y 1� •fid d t.1 rifle's' __ , fi "6 11 il 1 _. ...- fi - y _ I �\\\1 Z Vie ' o5tI • ili): p 8— II 1 . o n �i �.•43- D4 folic:p,Q,� i � t ''-'� — m a ice .Y .l .. NS s a. \�Fl\�y�\ j• �g � - er -r��\\_•�C��''—t 'fiTe'- dd - it. rL ti.r n Q \ 4 2 ,JIF rt ria.. lliqS p I _. 4 - `� / A. , moi. .- c P p Q Y�s D ?,/i V j 1111 H 1 I I 1 I : ,,,. .i ATTACHMENT _sq___ 4