HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1990 0404 CC REG ITEM 08IPAUL W. LAWRASON, Jr.
Mayor
SCOTT MONTGOMERY
Mayor Pro Tern
ELOISE BROWN
Councilmember
CLINT HARPER, Ph.D.
Councilmember
BERNARDO M.PEREZ
Councilmember
LILLIAN KELLERMAN
City Clerk
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MOORPARK ITEM
M E M 0 R A N D 11 M
The Honorable City (ouncil
Craig Phillips, Administrative Assistant
March 28, 1990 (for (:C meeting of 4/4/90)
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J. KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
RICHARD T. HARE
City Treasurer
Application for SB V1 Bicycle/Pedestrian Funds
Each year
at about this time
thc�
Ventura County Transportation
0 z
��
for
Transportation Development Act
a
(SB 821) projects. Tho
�Oq
total of available funds
M E M 0 R A N D 11 M
The Honorable City (ouncil
Craig Phillips, Administrative Assistant
March 28, 1990 (for (:C meeting of 4/4/90)
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J. KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
RICHARD T. HARE
City Treasurer
Application for SB V1 Bicycle/Pedestrian Funds
Each year
at about this time
thc�
Ventura County Transportation
Commission
requests applications
for
Transportation Development Act
Article 3
(SB 821) projects. Tho
estimated
total of available funds
for FY 1991 is $332,776 for B'cyc'e
are done and the
and Pedestrian route related
projects.
Applications will be
sent,
to the CTAC /SSTAC for initial
review on
April 10 and ranking on
May I
`.i, 1990. The rank ordered list
of SB 821
projects will be submit I
J t.,
`C,G on June 4, 1990.
Previously
funded applications
n Moorpark. include
three sidewalk
improvement
projects on High StreFi.
i-he projects (FY
1986 -87 $20,877,
FY 1987 -88
$45,123, FY 1988 -89 i�41,(in7)
totalled $107,007 in SB 821
moneys. The projects these fund
w e r r itended for
are done and the
final construction
costs wer(, :15`;
10 l7 There
is a remaining
balance of
$29,451.94 that wil
,f ap,)Iied to the completion of
improvements
between Bard Street
is vlagr,lia Avenue.
See Table 1 for
a break down
of pro,iect costs +n�
heir
There are two potential proje:t
for funding:
Los Angeles Avenue on the nortt
Street. The total estimated co, -,'
2 for detail of project costs)
(SR 821) and half from n
799 Moorpark Avenue
lr� competitive and may qualify
idc between Spring Road and Millard
o<_ the project is $90,440 (see Table
w?: d be funded half from Article 3
AN Funds The project
Moorpark, i-- alifornia 93021
(805) 529 -6864
would inc=lude about 1,200 feet. if curb, gutter, and an 8 foot
sidewalk. The need for the pro,jec+ is caused by the lack of a sidewalk
which impedes pedestrian movement, In addition school children must
cross at Roberts Avenue under the °upervision of a crossing guard. The
pedestrian way (ped -way) from below Flinn t.., :r LA Avenue on the east side
of Spring Road will be construct -od is part of TOPA PD 1064. The
ped -way from Roberts to LA Avenue +r tie west side of Spring Road will
be constructed by the City. `!e 1.A Avenue SB 821 project, in
conjunction with the TOPA and Ci!y project, will provide pedestrian
access to a signalized crossing at LA Avenue and Spring Road. Access
to the signalized crossing will si nif c:antly improvement in pedestrian
safety.
High Street on the north side between Bard Street and Magnolia Avenue.
The total estimated cost of the project. is $85,000 (see Table 2 for
detail of project costs). ,It- would be funded half from Article 3 (SB
821) and half from Article 8a Local Transportation Funds. The project
would include about 400 feet o-F c( rb, gutter, and a 20 foot sidewalk.
The need for the project is caused by the lack of a sidewalk which
results in intermingling of vehil, le ind pedestrian traffic. Adding
this final segment will complete .ed -ways on the north side of High
Street, separate vehicle and pede 't.rian movement, and enhance safety.
A request for funding was made la, t. yt�ar but was not awarded. It may
be that our previous awards and it :rep <ingly competitive projects from
other agencies was the reason far• r i. i°(q iO ng funding
Both of these projects have merir in terms of safety and completing
ped -way links. However, the L.A Avenue project is also part of two
other projects in the same area ar -od enhanc=es school c=hildren crossing
safety on a state highway with higi triffi, volumes. These factors may
be important advantages in the :ori dF,rat!(, process.
Staff Recommendation
Approve Resolution No. 90- t , r l =:.t. and authorize Los Angeles
Avenue as the FY 1991 SB 821 proJ_'o
sb82_lapp.adm
High Street ft- ,-I � Iinn] Costs
Design
$9,841.00
Administration
5,750.00
Inspection
7,080.00
Survey
6,831.00
Construction
125,008.12
Arbor.ist
600.00
Total $155,110.12
SB 821 Funds $107,007.00
Less 50% of Project Cost 77,555.06
Remainder $29,451.94
table. adm
,R1 R
LA Avenue Est 1 ,atol 'r(,ject Costs
Sidewalk $26,400
Curb, Gutter 10,200
AC Removal 8,400
AC Pave Out 9,600
Utility Adjustments 5,000
Traffic Control Adjustments 5,000
Adm, Design, Inspection at 20% 12,900
Contingency at. 20% 12)900
Total $90,400
high Street. Est m�,t ed F- oject Costs
Sidewalk $27,200
Curb, Gutter 4,250
AC Removal 2,550
AC Pave Out 24,650
Utility Adjustments 850
Traffic Control Adjustments 1,700
Adm, Design, Inspection at 20% 11,900
Contingency at 20% 11,900
Total $85,000
tablel.adm
-TT =_�xc II_� � _�
=-tT J"
��1_L_l. rT�i.
LA
Et =111--
>
>
---, <
SPRING rn
r\
Ao
k d -,--;-w
,fj jd