Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1990 0502 CC REG ITEM 08AMINUTES OF THE ITY COUNCIL Moorpark, California ITEM 8 -As April 4, 1990 A Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Moorpark, California was held on April 4, :_9'9f.., in the Council Chambers of City Hall of said City, located at 799 Mocr..-park Avenue, California. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Lawrason called the rn +yet. i rng t c order at 7:19 p. m. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge of AllegianCE� di. l; led by Councilmember Harper 3. ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Brown, Harper, Perez, Montgome:ir ,� , and Mayor Lawrason Steven Ki:eny, City Manager; Richard Hare, Deputy c:;.a.ty Manager; Pat Richards, Director of Community Development; Phil Newhouse, Director.: f Community Services; John Knipe, Assist:arii! Ci°.y Engineer, Craig Phillips, AdminLSt:l ati.ve Assistant, Lt. Rodriguez, Sheriff 'ci Department; Ken Gilbert, Public Works Di.s:4:�ctor; Cheryl Kane, City Attorney; Don Reyn °i -,lda, Management Analyst; Paul Porter, senior• Planner; David Baird, Build in,: '>f f c:: is , ; and Lillian Kellerman, City .1 '... 4. PROCLAMATIONS, COMMENDA'rio:X , P.ND SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS: A. Proclamation in Recc:u:: ;:,ition of the 100th Anniversary of the Federation of worens Club of America and the 84th Anniversary of the M —rpark Womens' Fortnightly Club. Councilmember Brower de the presentation. B. Proclamation Recogri. nq Apr-.-!- 22nd as Earth Day 1990. Councilmember Harper lade 1.he presentation. C. Presentation by Vert a County Community Foundation Mr. Ralph Mahan o: the Ventura County Community Foundation addressed he Council giving a report on the critical unmet needs _n Ventura County. Copies of the report had previous:1 been pr-)vided to the Council. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Pa ,e 2 April 4, 1990 5. REORDERING OF, AND ADDITILIPS To„ THE AGENDA: MOTION: Mayor Lawrason mov «ad and Councilmember Brown seconded a motion to add as Item 11 F. consideration of approval of a resolution in support of tt:p :a Boys and Girls Club of Moorpark's application for a grant uas3er the Youth Facilities Bond Act of 1988, the need for acti 1 having arisen after the posting of the agenda. The moti.or ;ar!7ied by unanimous voice vote. 6. PUBLIC COMMENT: Judy Lanahan, 4641 Pepper 'dill Street, addressed the Council regarding the need for spe : °ial police enforcement to handle the problem of dirt bike +:i sturbances behind her home. Connie Lawrason, 4291 Amoermeadow Street, addressed the Council regarding SB821 funds. She said the project begun on High Street should be cone hued until completed. Karen Latter, 510 New Lo Angeles Ave., of Santa Barbara Savings and Loan, addresse the Council regarding Item ll.E. She indicated that the prc; _ sect sign for the bank was needed and fit the sign criteria Violet Henry, 2220 Ventur, Blvd., Camarillo, addressed the Council regarding the Se ;or Nut:- -ition Program and CDBG funding. 7. COMMITTEE REPORTS: Councilmember Brown reported on the Transportation Planning Committee meeting on unmet needs and the Private Industry Council for the Summer You-i Employment Program. Mayor Lawrason reported >n the Public Works /Facilities Committee meeting with stamp to discuss possible museum sites for the Moorpark Historisi S u .et: 8• CONSENT CALENDAR: MOTION: Councilmember Mcntgomery moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion t::: pull Items B.A. Minutes of March 7, 1990 and Minutes of March 21, 1990, B.F., B.I., and B.K. and to approve the bal.anc of the Consent Calendar. The motion carried by unanimou roll call vote. A. Consider approval_ _ _�I,e mLnutes of the Adiourned Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Pare 3 April 4, 1990 Meeting of the City C'ouncil and Joint Meeting with the Planning Commission :;;f January 29, 1990. Consider approval of the minutes of the Adiourned City Council Meeting _L Fe_bru4Ky _10, 1988. Consider approval otthe minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of December_?, 1987. Consider approval of the minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of At.v ust 17, 1983. Staff Recommendatic:r Approve minutes as processed. B. Warrant Register Pre -paid Warrants L1260, 11299 L1302 - 11306 ,137e - 11385 $ 3,837.49 Payable Warrants L1394 - 11466 $153,097.89 C. Consider Bond Reduction for Tract 4338 (UWC). Staff Recommendation: Red,ce bond amounts. D. Consider Fence /Wall Bond Exoneration for Tracts 3019 & 3525 (Warmington) . Staff Recommendation: Authorize the City Clerk to exoner to °:he r:onds. E. Consider an amendment to an agreement with Impact Sciences regarding Planning Service for RPD 89 -1 CPD's 89 -1 & 89 -2 and PM-4416, (Mcleod & Devericks) . Staff Recommendation: Appi)ve amendment and authorize Mayor to sign. G. Consider Moorpark Avenue Parkway Landscaping. Staff Recommendation: AutF rize staff to proceed with project implementation. H. Consider Landscape Maintenance Contract with Turf Pro for Maintenance of Parks. Parkways and Medians. Staff Recommendation: Appc>ve contract extension. J. Consider Rescinding Resolution No. 87 -387 - A resolution establishing the _bylaws of the Redevelopment Agency. Staff Recommendation Rescind Resolution No. 87 -387. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Pa:,e 4 April 4, 1990 The following items were pu, led from the Consent Calendar for individual consideration: Consider approval of the minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of March_7,, _1990. The following amendments were made to page 12 of the Minutes of March 7, x)90 After the second paragraph add "Councilmember Brown stated she could or.l support a motion if it contained no figures." Motion to be amended °,-_o read "Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmerraber Brown seconded a motion to direct a Council Ac Hoc Committee of Councilmembers Harper and Montgomery, to meet with the City Attorney to revise the ordinance ro accommodate additional category of non - designated ,,f::>ol approximate base capacity figures to come frca 3BR traffic model...." Paragraph four to t Brown clarified that the understanding it a recommendation capacity and holdr consider. H amended to read "Councilmember er affirmative vote was made with ut:. the Committee would bring back the ADT numbers for the base capacity for the Council to MOTION: Councilmember 3rown moved and Councilmember Montgomery seconded a moti 7 ti) approve the Minutes of March 7, 1990 as amended. The oti:):n carried by unanimous voice vote. Consider approval oi the minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of M,:arch 21, 1990. MOTION: Councilmember Brow moved and Mayor Lawrason seconded a motion to continue consideration of the minutes until the April 18, 1990 City Coun meetir�. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. F. Consider performance a traffic speed survey. Staff Recommendation: Se'ect Charles Abbott Associate to perform the study. In response to Mayor Lawra:,.:.,n, Mr. (Albert clarified that the section of Tierra Rejada r >tween Spring and the freeway was covered in the speed sure Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Pa..;e 7 April 4, 1990 MOTION: Mayor Lawrasoni moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to appxc.,e the staff recommendation. The motion carried by unanimo-i VD..ce ,7ote. I. Consider SB 821. Pedestrian and Bikeway Grant Funding Application. Staff Recommendation: Approve Res. 90- 640 to select and at. °horize '.os Angeles Avenue as the FY 1991 SB 821 proje . In response to Mayor Lawrason, Mr. Kueny clarified that the balance of the sidewalk improvement project on High Street is funded in *tie 1989/90 Budget and that was why the staff recommendation was to authorize Los Angeles Avenue sidewalk as !: e proposed SB 821 project. MOTION: Mayor Lawrason moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to apprc:,e the staff recommendation. The motion carried by unanimou voce vote. K. Consider Modificaticr.; to Condition No. 25 of PD 1049 (CEDC). Staff Recommendation: Authorize City Manager to approve occupanc- -s prior to park improvements if determined necessai, Councilmember Montgc,ery indicated that he had pulled this item as a coirrttrey to Councilmember Perez, who had indicated he woui.d ;.Ir Sta_ Al. MOTION: Councilmember Mc.,7tgomery moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion .c approve the staff recommendation. The motion carried 4 -0, C' nci:.member Perez abstaining. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Consider 1990/91 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Appropriation:__ Staff Recommendation: Approve Budget and Finance Committee recommendations for 1990/91 appropriations. (Car °.nued I -em 9.D. from 3/21/90). Mr. Reynolds gave to staff :-eport. As the public heari3,.g on this item was closed at the March 21, 1990 meetig, Councilmember Lawrason opened the floor to Counci a ti8Ct1881Jn.. Councilmember Pere requested that $7,000 be reappropriated fron affordable housing or public improvement for Chan! -1 Counties Legal Services Agency. He said he felt the:, aervire to Moorpark residents was important. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Pag« 6 April 4, 1990 In response to Counc:ilmembers Brown and Harper, Mr. Reynolds said 1,078 w,is the total number served by the Channel Counties Legal. Services but that the specific number of residents from Moorpark was not designated. Councilmember Brown :stated that in the future those applying for CDBG funds should respond to whether they were currently servir,:a Moorpark residents and in what numbers. MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to approve the staff recommendation. AMENDMENT TO MOTION: -''ouncilmember Perez moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to re- allocate $7,000 in CDBG funds from the recommended amount for Public Improvements to the Channe. Counties Legal Services Agency. The amendment was withdraw: AMENDMENT TO MOTION: 2ouncilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to re- allocate $7,000 in CDBG funds from the land acquisition portion of affordable housing for the Channel Counties Legal Services Agency with the understanding that Chanel Counties Legal Services was to open an office in Moorpark The amendment carried by unanimous voice vote. SECOND AMENDMENT TO MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Mayor Lawrason seconded an amendment that the Charles Street Improvement project be amended to Nogales /Avenida Colonia and Charles Street linprovement project. The amendment carried by unanimous vo..ce ote. VOTE ON THE MAIN MOTION: The mot ..on carried by unanimous voice vote. B. Consider Appeal No. 90 -1 JBH Development Regarding the Scope of Work Needed Prepare a Traffic Study for TR4620 (Continued It,.em .9.A. _from 3/21/90). Staff Recommendation: Deny the appeal. MOTION: Councilmember Flarper moved and Councilmember Montgomery seconded a motior to continue the item to the April 18, 1990 City Council meetng as JBH Development had sent a letter requesting the cont nuation The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Pac, -a April 4, 1990 C. Consider Abatement of Hazardous Unreinforced Masonry Buildings - A report regarding a proposed ordinance to require structural upgrades to unreinforced masonry buildings. (Continues. Item 9.C. from 3/21/90). Staff Recommendation: Approve the draft resolution and introduce the ord:Lnaz:.e for f :_rst reading. Mr. Baird gave the staff report. Mayor Lawrason opened the public hearing and, as there were no speakers fox this item, he closed the public hearing. CONSENSUS: By consensus this item was tabled until later in the meeting for City Attor,ey review of the language of the ordinance. D. Consider IPD 89 -2 Annotti & Petrilli - a request to construct a 32,650 _square foot industrial building within an M -1 zone. Staff Recommendation: Approve with conditions of development. Mr. Porter gave the r,:aff report. In response to Counci. member Brown, Mr. Porter said that regarding the exterior lighting plan, the lights were directed down and thf- lumens were kept down. Mayor Lawrason openec- the pub,.i.c hearing. Marc Annotti, 5000 Pa,kway, 1103, Calabassas, addressed the Council saying that he had met with the homeowners trying to mitigate their concerns. He said the lights would shine away frorr the residences and the height of the building had peen lowered per the homeowners' request. He said the fuel tank on the property had been removed and there had been no leakage. He said that in regard to the landscaping, he felt that a full planter was the best screenim , that coild be provided. He asked that a specific tree <3ize be designated and said that a 24 inch box tree w,, = ,:: good size. In response to Counc..lmember Perez, Mr. Annotti said that more parking wa- helpfu: to a project in case a tenant. business grew,,, n E i s,e. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page 8 April 4, 1990 Phy Mason, P.O. Box 563, Moorpark, said that she lived next to the Annotti project. She discussed the proposed increase to the 30- -fc:ot . andscaping along the eastern property line and sai:i that the additional landscaping and the resultant reducta_on of parking spaces in that area would create a Letter buffer than if large trucks were parked there William Mason, P.O.. Box 563, Moorpark, thanked the Planning Commissioners and Mr. Annotti for their consideration of the residents in the area of the project. He said the ,:,roposed increased landscaping was important. Mayor Lawrason closet the pub is hearing. The Council discussed the tree size for the proposed landscaping and the k.:ilding °olor pallet. AT THIS POINT in the meetLr.,4, Mayor Lawrason declared a 15 minutes recess. The me(­.inc re(.-)nvened at 9:50 p.m. The Council discussed us, g `fund_ from the $25,600 Tree Removal Permit for landsc- opinci :)f the stub streets in the residential tract to the e.,st )f the project, and of cul de sac near this project and ('het pot,�!ntial locations. MOTION: Councilmember grown roved and Councilmember Montgomery seconded 3. notion to approve the staff recommendation to approve tie Negative Declaration, adopt the findings contained in the staff report dated February 5, 1990, and direct staff to prepar,, a reso]ution to be presented at the next meeting conditianaly approving IPD -89 -2; the recommendation tying apprc,.aJ. to -L traffic signal at Los Angeles Avenue and Maureen ::aane to be deleted; the box size of the trees required for t ie pro -.Nett to be at the discretion of the Community Developmei C i -ec�t r The motion, carried by unanimous voice vote. Continued from eariier in the me« ircc C. Consider Abatement of Hazar, - A report regarding 3 structural upgrades to _ (Continued Item 9.C. from Approve the draft resort _ first reading. sous Unreinforced Masonry Buildings _,proposed ordinance to require inreinforced masonry buildings. 3/21/90) _ Staff Recommendation: itd irv.roduce the ordinance for Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paye 9 April 4, 1990 Councilmember Montgomery stated that during the earlier break, the City Attorney had answered his questions regarding the language of the ordinance In response to Councilmember: Brown, Mr. Baird indicated that the proposed ordinance was a Los Angeles City Ordinance and that he did not know if th- ordinance had been adopted by a small city. Ms. Kane read the amende,t language of the ordinance as contained in the staff repor (Sections 8.08.100 and 8.08.110) and read the ordinance in v i de . Councilmember Brown asked for clarification on the implementation of the ordinance when passed. She asked that staff respond as to the pro,-ess for the owner of the building and what fees would be inv, E vec ,. MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to waive furtr:er reading of the ordinance and declare Ordinance No. 126 read title only. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to declare Drdr -ante No. 126 introduced and read for the first time. The motion +..arr.ied by unanimous voice vote. The ordinance was introduced for firE4t. reading. E. Consider PD 1062 Embassy Plaza, Inc._ - Major Modification to provide additional free - standing building to the existing Community Use Building. 5taf'f Recommendation: Deny the request. (Please note that lue to app:Licant's failure to post the property, this hearnj rust be :ontinued.) MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to continue the i.tern unt..l the April 18, 1990 City Council meeting as the applicant. had failed to post the property. The motion carried by unanimous it E °.-ot <. 10. COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL MEMBk -,S A. Appointment to the Mc rpark Mcsquito Abatement District MOTION: Councilmember Brawn moved to retain the current appointment., The motion 1 . , �d for :1_3ck of a second. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to conti.r...ae the ..tem until the May 2, 1990 meeting, another press :,.•lease �o be prepared on the appointment. The motici r.Ed L)v i.:nanimous voice vote. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Page to April 4, 1990 B. Appointment of Tenant +ommi.ssioner for Housing Authority MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a motion to re- appoint Virginia Hall as the Tenant Commissioner to the Housing Authorit },. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. C. Confirm Appointment t:c the Countywide Planning Advisory Committee. CONSENSUS: By consensus the Counci_i determined to continue the item until Mrs. Wozniak had been contacted. Mr. Kueny indicated to the Council that staff would report back to the Council on a mechanism to keep the Council informed on meetings attend(d by their. appointees. Councilmember Brown said she would like some further consideration to improving i e li.ght_ng situation at the TOPA project. Mayor Lawrason said he would like to encourage another 24 hour police car in the budget. Mayor Lawrason said he wound like a handout prepared which designates the locatior at the nearest emergency medical facility. 11. DISCUSSION /ACTION ITEMS: A. Consider Purchase of;,.,Childrens' Tables and Chairs. Staff Recommendation: Approve the recommendation. Mr. Newhouse gave the staff report. He explained that the Kiwanis Club, t.hra,igh fund .raising efforts, had been able to generate fund for a $300 donation to the City for youth recreation. He said that adjustable tables and juvenile folding ::ha:zrs to be used in the youth programs would be tie best use of the funds. He recommended that the 'ouncil approve an appropriation of $548.54 from the R(,cre,atior Special Events funds to combine with the R Aiwa i s ionat ion for the purchase. The Council indicated °.he Lr tf anks to the Kiwanis Club for the donation. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paye 11 April 4, 1990 MOTION: Councilmember Browao moved and Mayor Lawrason seconded a motion to approve the ,taff' recommendation. The motion carried by unanimous rcl.. all vote. B. Consider Proposed Scope of Work for Sphere of Influence Study. Staff Recommendation: Approve Scope of Work. Mr. Richards gave the staff report, going over the draft scope of work for the Sphere of Influence study. Mr. Richards explained tine role of the consultant for the General Plan Update �n =he Sphere of Influence study relative to their cu renY c.or„tract with the City. Mayor Lawrason indi:ated that PBR should provide a summary of what they are doing in the current contract and net that out of he Sphere of Influence study. Councilmember Harper said under the current plan the build -out would be .3t.,OOC, which he said was reasonable. He expressed his concern that the City would be doubling the land mass of t :e City with the new sphere of influence. He said hat if 'he CPO was in place, his reaction would be diiPerent. Councilmember Brown E, ated that other Cities do planning outside their bounda :.es Councilmember Perez s.:fid that he would support changing the scope of work to consider a density of one dwelling unit per five acres zither than per one acre within the expanded Sphere of' I °' I dPnc e boundary. Councilmember Montgonr,ery said he believed moving ahead with the Sphere of I flienr_e at.udy was very protective of the community. MOTION: Councilmember Mc,btgoinery moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a motion , approve the scope of work as presented by staff, techni al editing by staff to be allowed and staff directed to crear_e the request for proposal to be sent out to selected coisz ants AMENDMENT TO MOTION: Councilmember Perez moved and Councilmember Harper second «.d an amendment to change the scope of work to consider an urbon density of no greater than one dwelling unit per five acre::, rather than per one acre within an expanded Sphere of In:luence boundary. The amendment failed 2 -3, Councilmember. Brc7wr end Montgomery and Mayor Lawrason dissenting. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Pag 12 April 4, 1990 VOTE ON THE MAIN MOTION: The motion carried by roll call vote 3 -2, Councilmembers Harper end Peres,, dissenting. C. Consider Tech Circle /Poindexter Avenue Right -turn Restriction of Condition No. 29, DP -330 (Poindexter and Associates). Staff ' ?ecommendation: Direct staff as deemed appropriate. Mr. Knipe gave tine staff report. He said that the minute action approved by the City Council for DP -330 in Condition No. 29 said that right turn movement for all traffic from Tech Circle onto Poindexter Avenue should be restricted but that Resolution No. 86 -293 prohibited truck traffic only from turning right onto Poindexter Avenue f.rocr 7'ech C._rcle. Mr. Kueny indicated that.. the sign would need to be replaced to match the resolution, if the Council determined to confirm the existing resolution. MOTION: Councilmember Brown moved and Councilmember Harper seconded a motion to confix:m existing! Resolution No. 86 -293, restricting only truck t:ra�fic from making right turns onto Poindexter Avenue. The rt °:iou :7a:ried by unanimous voice vote. D. Moorpark Plaza Sign Santa Barbara Savings. Staff Recommendations Accept the recommendation of the Community Developmen{ Corrcrrrstt�,?e. Mr. Richards gave t-it st:.aff report. In response to Cour,c lmember Montgomery, Mr. Richards said that the other pr )posed s :gn had been too large for the location. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moveca and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to appro-e the staff recommendation. The motion carried by unanimoi� voice v:)te. E. Consider Proposed Ordinance No. Establishing Hours of Operation for Restaurants, Bars and Taverns Selling Alcoholic Beverages Staff Recommendation: Approve the draft ordinance. (7, itir:ued item 11.E. 3/7/90). Mr. Richards said that additr.onal information received from the City Attorney, indicated that this item should be continued in order is past the notices for a public hearing. Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Pad< ].3 April 4, 1990 MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Perez seconded a motion to continued the item until it could be Posted for a public hearing The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. F. Consider Resolution 90 -641 in Support of the Boys and Girls Club of Moorpark's Application for a Grant under the youth Facilities Bond Act of 1988. Mayor Lawrason indici,:ed that the Boys and Girls Club of Moorpark felt it. �aign.ificant that the City adopt a resolution in favcr of support for their application for grant funding to p�ir-•hale t.h +� Casey Road High School Gym. MOTION: Councilmember riarper moved and Councilmember Montgomery seconded a moti.)n to adopt the resolution. The motion carried by unanimou voice vr)te. 12. ORDINANCES: None were presented. 13. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: Councilmember Perez asked for further consideration of the implementation of some dowT!t-.owri study measures. Mayor Lawrason asked that a wwater conservation program be developed. 14. CLOSED SESSION: MOTION: Councilmember Montgomery moved and Councilmember Lawrason seconded a motion o go into Closed Session under all items listed: A. Personnel. B. Potential litigation,,ursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (b)(1). C. Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (c). D. Litigation concernrr;.) C_-ty c >f Moorpark vs. Moorpark Unified School Distr -t.. E. Litigation concernir, Moorpark Unified School District Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paq� 4 April 4, 1990 vs. City of Moorpark F. Litigation concernin, City --1 Moorpark vs. Fedelety Corporation (Arroyc `,:.sta Park). G. Litigation concerning Ventura County Community College District vs. City of Moorpark. H. Litigation concernin(, the County of Ventura vs. City of Moorpark. I. Litigation concerning Rosenkrantz vs. City of Moorpark. J. Negotiations for Rea. Property on the North Side of Tierra Rejada Road East of Spring Road (Pacifica Corp.) pursuant to Governmert. Code Section 54945.8. The motion carried by unanimou! vo:_ce vote. AT THIS POINT in the meeting Mayor Lawrason declared a recess. The Council reconvened into C1 sed Session at 11:45 p.m. Present in the Closed Session were all Councilmembers and Steven Kueny, City Manager; Cheryl Kane, City Attorney; Richard Hare, Deputy City Manager; and Pat Richards, Director of Community Development: Mr. Richards left the :loPd Sessi�:)n at 11:53 p.m. The Council reconvened int:., Open Session at 12:54 a.m. Mr. Kueny stated that Item 14. F, Litigation concerning the County of Ventura vs. City of M:x r•park had not been discussed. 14.I. Litigation concerninu:; Rosenkrantz vs. City of Moorpark. MOTION: Councilmember Harper moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a motion to approve the settlement of Rosenkrantz v. City of Moorpark et al and authorize the Mayor to sign the Mutual Release of Claims and related documents and the attorney representing the City to file t �e document-.s on the City's behalf. The vote carried by unanimor :i,_,f, o' , Minutes of the City Council Moorpark, California Paa- 15 April 4, 1990 15. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION: Councilmember Perez moved and Councilmember Montgomery moved to adjour, The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. The time of adjournment wear "x.57 i.m. Mayor Paul W. Lawrason Jr. ATTEST: Lillian Kellerman, City Clerk MINUTES OF THE CITY COUNCIL April 11, 1990 Moorpark, California A Special Meeting of the City Council of City of Moorpark, California was held on April 11, 1990, in the Council Chambers California. Hall of said City, located at 799 Moorpark Pvenue, Moorpark, 1. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Lawrason called the meetinki to order at 5:08 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL_ Brawr,, Harper, Perez and Mayor Present: Councilmembers Lawrason. Absent: Councilmember Montgomery Steven Kueny, City Manager; Cheryl Kane, City Attorney; and Pat Richards, Director of Community Development. 3. CLOSED SESSION: MOTION_ Councilmember Harper .rxoved and Councilssion Brown seconded a motion to adjour into Closed Session for a discussion of the following: A. Personnel. B. Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1). C. Potential litigation pur .5uant t.o c,:Iovernment Code Section 54956.9(c). D. Litigation concerning It Of Moorpark vs. Moorpark Unified School District E. Litigation concerning m,:�orpark linified School District vs. City of Moorpark. F. Litigation concerning City of Moorpark vs. Fedelety Corporation (Arroyo Vi=ita Park). G. Litigation concerning xentura county Community College District vs. City Of N )or.park. H. Litigation concerning he :ounty of Ventura vs. City of Moorpark. Minutes of the City Council April 11, 1990 Moorpark, California Paqe P I. Negotiations for Real �,roperty on the North Side of Tierra Rejada Road East .f Sprinq road (Pacifica Corp.) pursuant to Government 7de Section 54945.8, The motion carried by unanimc °,,9 vuic:e vote. Present in Closed Session were Councilmembers Brown, Harper, Perez, and Mayor Lawrason; Steven Kueny, City Manager: and Cheryl Kane, City Attorney. The meeting reconvened k.ntc Open Session at 6 :22 p.m. Mr. Kueny stated that only items 3.B., 3.C., 3.D., 3.E., 3.F., 3.G. nad been discussed and there was no action to report as , result, of the Closed Session. 4. ADJOURNMENT: MOTION: Councilmember Perez moved and Councilmember Brown seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting. The motion carried by unanimous voice vote. ^'h- time of adjournment was 6:23 p.m. Paul W Lawrason Jr., Mayor ATTEST: Lillian E. Kellerman, City Clerk