HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1990 0516 CC REG ITEM 08HPAUL W. LAWRASON, Jr.
Mayor
SCOTT MONTGOMERY
Mayor Pro Tern
ELOISE BROWN
Councilmember
CLINT HARPER, Ph.D.
Councilmember
BERNARDO M.PEREZ
Councilmember
LILLIAN KELLERMAN
City Clerk
TO:
FROM
DATE:
SUBJECT:
ITE
MOORPARK M�E�
M E M O R A N D I1 M
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J.KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
RICHARD T. HARE
City Treasurer
The Honorable City Council
Craig Phillips, Administrative Assistant C P
May 10, 1990 (for CC; meeting of 5- 16 -90)
AD -84 -2
The Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance Assessment District (AD -84 -2)
was formed in May 1984. Assessments 'n this district have been levied
every year since FY84 -85. Two artloi -s are needed relative to AD -84 -2.
The First action is to approve the Engineer's Report (copy enclosed).
The report describes the improvements to be maintained in AD -84--2 as
well as the method of assessment Approval of the report at this time
enables the hearing to be set but does not preclude changes to the
budget, proposed assessments, o^ mo,' hw (Nf ,pread.
The proposed assessments for Iiylting and landscaping for a single
family level 1 home are $21.37 and 19 f5 respectively for a total annual
assessment of $31.22. This compa.es t.c $39.66 in FY89 -90 with $24.56
for lighting and $15.10 for lands:il.,ing. "ie total projected budget for
street lighting in FY90 -91 is ''2(1(,00(1 The City is currently
responsible for approximately "T'0' st y eet. lights The total prcjected
budget for citywide landscaping) s $161i 755. Thi-, total includes
thirteen median islands and slcp( ppiipor tree sprayi rig, tree removal,
trimming and replacement, w i al)a',ement, and miscellaneous
improvements.
The second action is to declare th, Counc.i 's intention to make changes
in the annual assessments for AP, 4-2 and to set a public hearing to
receive objections to the work or, e r -xier of the assessment district.
The law allows the public hearing ^ak(, (� ace up until the
The Honorable City Council
May 10, 1990
Page 2
last regular scheduled meeting of the i i,i al year. The public hearing
could be heard as late as June 2( 1991
As in past years staff recommends :ha the proposed assessment district
budget be reviewed in conjunctior^ ha,
the proposed City Budget.
Staff Recommendation
That the City Council:
1) adopt Resolution 90- approving the AD -84 -2 Engineer's
Report for the fiscal year rommencinq 'uly 1, 1990 and ending June
30, 1991;
2) adopt Resolution 90- m6 ng certain changes, ordering the
annual assessments, and fixir,(. the pilh-ic hearing for June 6,
1990; and
3) review the proposed budget for AD -84 -2 in conjunction with the
Council's review of the propo—d FY `a0 91 City Budget.
Enclosure: Engineer's Report for '0 -84 -2
Staff Report - Initiat nq AP F�oceedings
DCM.89564a
RESOLUTTON NO "10
A RESOLUTION OF THE ATY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S
REPORT, FOR "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -84 -2" FOR
THE FISCAL YEAR COMMFNCTNG 1E1I_v 1, 1990 AND ENDING
JUNE 30, 1991.
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 9(1-633, Uie City
Council ordered the
City Manager to cause to be prepared an Fngineer's
Report in accordance
with Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2 fliv lion 15
of the California
Streets and Highways Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to said Rt,,olution, the Engineer's
Report was
filed with the City Clerk on the day e,
1990; and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk ha, submitted the
report to the City
Council and the City Council hay- ow roviowed and
examined the report
as so submitted,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OUNCfi OF THE
CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOW"
SECTION 1. The Engineer' Report for "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISIRICI NO. AD -84
-2" for the fiscal
year commencing July 1, 1990 an ending June 30, 1991 prepared pursuant
to Resolution No. 90 -633 filed w`°h the "it.y Clerk
on the 7th day of
February, 1990 is hereby approved
SECTION 2. That said EnginFyer' <„ Retort may
be further modified
or changed, pursuantt to the pro-vi ion f Section
22630 of the Streets
and Highways Code,
SECTION 3. The City Cle 0 isI ertify to
the adoption of this
resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS _ day f _ ___
, 1990.
Rernardo Perez, Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
(SEAL)
RESOLUTION ,r) nr
A RESOLUTION OF THE CI Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, IJEC:LA:ING ITS INTENTION TO
MAKE CERTAIN CHANGES AND TO )RDER THE ANNUAL
ASSESSMENTS FOR THE "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCI ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO.
AD -84 -2" FOR THE FISCA'. YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1,
1990 AND ENDING JUNE ), 199!. PURSUANT TO THE
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTNM ACT 01 1972; AND FIXING
A TIME AND PLACE FOR HE)i,INC ()R, "!,,UTIONS THERETO.
WHEREAS, pursuant to the rovision, of the "Landscaping and
Lighting Act
of 1972 ", being Div sion
15 Part 2 of the
Streets and
Highways Code
of the State of Cal for-nia,
the City Council
of the City
of Moorpark,
by its Resolution N >. 00-6)
1, proposed to
make certain
changes to
the "MOORPARK 1:,1GiITIN",
ANI) LANDSCAPING
MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
NO. AD -84-: ars(°
c extend the
improvements
specified in
said district for t lA f i ;i
, l year commencing
July 1, 1990
and ending June 30, 1991; and
f and to 1)rovide incidental
expenses in connection therewi +l
WHEREAS, by said Resolutions Jo 9t) -h , the City Council ordered
the City Manager- to cause to b. )-pared ,iii Engineer's Report, pursuant
to Article 4, Chapter 1, Pai t i i, i�, ()n 15 of said Streets and
Highways Code; and
WHEREAS, the Engineer's Report ,ia�, prepared and filed, and the
same was approved by the City C,r (i1 n he ____ day of y 1990,
by Resolution No,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OTINC�T. OF THE CTTY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOL],(A,
SECTION 1. That the publi
irnto� rest and convenience require and
it is the intention of the City C;
in,, ] of the City of Moorpark to make
certain changes to the "Moorpark
Lighting; and Landscaping Maintenance
Assessment District No. AD -84 -"
to order extension of the annual
assessments for said district fo
the fiscal year commencing July 1,
1990 and ending June 30, 1991.
id "MOORPARK LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRT(7
�C ^.D -84 -2" consists of a single
city -wide zone to provide -�I>(
r,, w rent or energy for public
lighting within the City, to I)r
id( or installation or maintenance
landscaping and the construct cst
a,intenance of curb, gutter, or
sidewalk structures and facilitf�,
n�,tf1l or construct facilities,
which are appurtenant to any -�f
r( fct- cgoing, for the maintenance or
servicing or both, of any of 1,h
f and to 1)rovide incidental
expenses in connection therewi +l
SECTION
2.
That said ghtiiig
rind Landscape maintenance
assessment
district
shall spec i is �i 4 i
include the lighting and
landscape sites
with
all improvemerts ocald
therein, described by and
heretofore
included
within "1' ORfARK
1.T(IHT1NG ANT) LANDSCAPING
MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT N(
SECTION 3. 'That the forog ink; i, si ribed work is to be located
within said Assessment District ic- 'i, )iindary of which is more
particularly described on a map wi id, n the City Clerk's office, and
entitled "Boundary Map, City ( =i "Im.I i,"I Lighting and Landscaping
Maintenance Assessment District '4 A) s;4 1 ", filed in the office of
the City Clerk on the of
SECTION 4. Reference is ,o f�h, nade to the report of the
Engineer on file with the City C:;e iiid olon to inspection, for a full
and detailed description of tiro nprcvc,m(-its, the boundaries, of the
Assessment District and any zone. read;,; Ind the proposed assessments
upon assessable lots and parcel. ) hin the District.
SECTION 5. Notice is her
'g 1990, at the hour of 7 00
City Hall of said City, located
and all persons having any objc,c.
assessment district. may appear rirac
be done or carried out or why ;,ii
the fiscal year commencing Jr l'..
Protests must be in writing, iri,i
with the City Clerk prior to l c
protest shall state all groun('::;
description sufficient, to identit
SECTION 6. All the wor'-
accordance with the Landscapinj; i
of Division of 15 of the Sti
California.
SECTION 7. The City Clc rE
be given by causing the Resolnfi
mailed in the manner required h,
and Highways Code,.
rl
�w p, , l vc+ t that on the /� _ day of
raa iii the Council Chambers of the
1) t•tc, )rpark Avenue, Moorpark, any
1011 ,, the work or extent of the
;h <w i.;i ase why said work should not
1 t ,
i, should not be extended for
!I;,)( and ending June 30, 1991.
uu . t 64-, filed by the property owner
C it c „<, ion of the hearing and such
liar of jection and shall contain a
l,, ')I ,-1 ty.
)c r- iii proposed shall be done in
ipht ig Act of 1972, being Part 2
, .f f i , -hways Code of the. State of
h 11 c;a ase notice of the hearing to
f 1 ontion to be published and
' Division 15 of the Streets
SECTION 8.. The City C 1 er1 1 r f v to the Adoption of this
resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this f 1990.
Pori nrdo Perez, Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
(SEAL)
DCM.895261
PAUL W. LAWRASON, Jr.
Mayor
SCOTT MONTGOMERY
Mayor Pro Tem
ELOISE BROWN
Councilmember
CLINT HARPER, Ph.D.
Councilmember
BERNARDO M. PEREZ
Councilmember
LILLIAN KELLERMAN
City Clerk
MOORPARK
M E M O R A N D U M
ITEl111 •
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J.KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
RICHARD T. HARE
City Treasurer
TO: The Honorable City Co(inci1
FROM: Susan Cauldwell, Administrative Assistan
DATE: January 26, 1990
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION INTITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL
ASSESSMENTS FOR THE "MOORPARK LIGHTING MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD- 84 -2 "; AND ORDERING
PREPARATION OF THE F.NGINFER "S REPORT
Annual assessments for the Liq,ting and Landscaping Maintenance
District (AD -48 -2) are determiine,^ through the preparation of the
Engineer's Report. This report, which is required by State law)
evaluates the benefits received b„ various, classes of properties and
spreads the costs according to an :p,-oved method of distributiAn. The
estimated annual maintenance cost and requisite maintenance program
are also part of the report. !t. c ,y )f the Engineer's Report for the
current year has been previously 1 ,avided �.o the Council. This report
explains the method of spread and olat:ed iratters. The Landscaping and
Lighting District has been funded (; I year since its inception in 1984.
After submission of the Enginee
conduct a public hearing in la
protests, comments concerning tlu
pertinent matters. The Engineer,
assessments levied prior to July
extended to no later than the tki
the County Auditor. At this t ,,
meeting the July 1 date.
Report, the City Council must
May )r early June to consider
-usts, method of spread and other
Repor° must be approved and the
Under state law, this date may be
t *A)nday in August if authorized by
�t.;ff does not foresee a problem
MOORPARK, CAOIrUPN'q
City Council Meeting
of
-- -- 19ii<��
ACTION:
The Honorable City Council
January 26, 1990
Page 2
The cost for preparation of the Engineer`s Report has been included in
the adopted budget for FY89 -90. Thy- purpose of the proposed Resolution
is to formally authorize initiatioc of the process and to direct the
City Manager to secure the serv''c o, a gi,alified engineer to prepare
the necessary Engineer's Report.
As the Council may recall, Dwight French and Associates submitted a
two -year proposal in 1989 for the preparation of the Engineer's Report
for AD -84 -2. The cost for the FY89 -90 report was $3,700 plus direct
expenses. The cost for the Fyn "I report is $2,900 plus direct
expenses.
The FY89 -90 budget includes $3,701 fo,• preparation of the Engineer's
Report for AD -84 -2 for FY90 -91.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Adopt Resolution No. 90 -� Initiating Proceedings for AO -84 -2
and Ordering Preparation of Fnoineer's Report.
2. Authorize the City Manager to ecure the services of Dwight French
and Associates to prepare the Engineer's Report for the Lighting
and Landscaping Maintenance +ssessment District (AD -84 -2) at a
cost not to exceed $3,700. Any c::osi above $3,700 will require
prior approval of the City Cot, i1
SC /I s
ADM.90125D
May 9, 1990
ENGINEER09 REPORT
CITY OF MOORPARA
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
NO. AD -84 -2
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
PREPARED BY:
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
706 N. DIAMOND BAR BLVD.
DIAMOND BAR, CA 91765
TABLE ( -F CONTENT6
P T=. :
section
1
Authority for Report
1
Section
2
Description of 'Improvements
to be Maintained
1
Section
3
Assessment Roll
3
Section
4
Method of Formula c: >f Cost Spread
3
Section
5
Estimate of Cost
4
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Appendix E
Appendix F
Appendix G
Street Lighting Formula - Table 1
Landscape Formula - I.'able
Assessment Summary Table 3
Budget Estimate
Boundary Map
Assessment Roll
Resolutions
05i10i9O 1F.:01 Z -14 0 -, D FRENCH & ASSOC
CITY OF MOORPARK
Engineer's Report.
Parks Maintenance Assessment District No.
AD -84
Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972
For Fiscal Year ;.990 -1991
This report is prepared pursuant to City Council action taken at
their regular meeting of April, 199(.) to extend this District for
the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1990 and ending June 30, 1991
in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter, 1,
"Landscaping Act of 197211, being Part 2 of Division 15 of 'the
California Streets and Highways Cods.
The District will provide electrical energy for public lighting
facilities and for operation and maintenance of public lighting
within the city. In addition, the District will provide for
installation and /or maintenance .,,ublic landscaping within the
public right -of -way.
SECTION 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS TO BE MAYNTAINF
This Report covers the period of July 1, 1990 through June 30,
1991. An updated repo-.-t is prepared each year to reflect updated
annual costs and changes in parcelizat.ion.
The improvements to be maintained in this District include all
City -owned and Southern California Edison (S.C.E.) -owned street
lights as well as all medians and street trees within public
rights -o£ -way within the boundaries of the city.
Lighting maintenance shall include, but is not limited to, energy
costs, removal, repair, replacement or relocation of light
standards, poles, bulbs, fixtures and all appurtenances. Servicing
of S.C.E. owned lights as defined in Section 22538 of the Streets
and Highways Code shall be furnished by the Southern California
Edison Company or its successors, cr- this servicing shall be as
authorized by the Public Utilities C:dmmissiun, State of California.
Maintenance of City -owned l i.ghtinq - -rlprnvernents shall be furnished
by the City.
Landscape maintenance shall include, but is not limited to,
watering, fertilizing, mowing, weed control, shrubbery, tree
removal and pruning, removal and replacement of dead growth,
maintenance of irrigation facilitiol and ot=her necessary work.
16
In addition, the cost to maintain unproved areas within an easement
will be borne be owners within ghat. project. These easement areas
are:
1. Tract No. 2851
Maintenance costs associated with landscaping in the
Ventura County Flood Control Easement and portions of the
interior tract entry areas. The obligation upon these
74 lots is pursuant to > condition of development.
2. Tract No. 2865
Cost for maintenance of specific landscape areas within
the tract, including landscaping at Christian Barrett &
Spring Roads; Tierra Rejada landscaping, and Peach Hill
Road landscaping on east side between Christian Barrett
and Tierra Rejada Roads The obligation upon the lots
within this tract is pursuant to a condition of
development.
3. Tract No. 3032
Maintenance costs associated with an entry monument at
Buttercreek Road and Los Angeles Avenue. This cost to
be spread to the 265 lots within the tract.
4. Tract No. 3274
Maintenance costs associated with landscape areas along
Williams Ranch Road parkway adjacent to Peach Hill drain
channel and Edison entries within PC -3. This cost will
be borne by the 220 lots: within the tract.
5. Tract Nos. 3019, 3525
Maintenance costs associated with landscaping the Tierra
Rejada Road slope and, parkway areas and parkway on the
west side of Peach Hill Road between Williams Ranch and
Tierra Rejada Roads within Tract Nos. 3019 and 3525. The
cost is to be spread tr) the 21 " lots within the tracts.
6. Tract 3306
Cost for landscape areas within Tract 3306 at the
westerly terminus of Inglewood Street. The cost is to
be spread to the 22 lo: within the tract.
SSESSMENT ROLL
All parcels of real property affec..ted are listed on the "Assessment
Roll ", Exhibit A, which will be on file in City Hall with the City
Clerk, and s made a part hereof by reference. These parcels are
more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with
Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code which are on file in
the office of the Ventura County Assessor in the County Government
Center Administration Building, 800 S. Victoria Avenue, Ventura,
California and which are also madf,� a part hereof by reference.
SECTION 4 ESTIMATE OF COST
The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, in Section 22573, states
that "The net amount to be assessed upon the lands within an
assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method
which fairly distributes the new amount among all assessable lots
or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits t be received
by each such lot or parcel from the improvements."
Lighting
The primary benefits of street lighting are for the convenience,
safety and protection of people and the security or protection of
property, property improvements and goods. The intensity or degree
of illumination provided can have a bearing on both.
The single family home - Level 3. has been selected as the base unit
for the spread of assessments. E3y definition, the single family
home - Level 1 is a single family home located on a street that has
existing street lights. A factor of 1.00 has been assigned to the
base unit, which is composed of benefit factors which correspond
to the following types of benefit
People Use - People related :.)enefits 0.50
Security Benefit - Property ;)rotect. ion 0.25
Intensity - Degree of illuimiiat -on 0.25
1.00
Parcels in other land use categories were then rated by comparison
with the basic unit. (See Table 1 )
People Use - People related t >enefitii
1. Reduction in night accidents and attendant human misery.
2. Reduced vulnerability, criminal assault during hours
of darkness.
3. Promotion of business operations during evening hours.
4. Increased safety on roaci3 and highways.
security Benefit - Propert)i l ,t°otection
1. Reduction in vandalism . -ind other criminal acts, and
damage to improvements
2. Reduction in burglariefi
Intensity
Intensity or degree of illumination provided on streets varies
with type of street, date of installation and the use of the
property adjacent thereto.
Landscaping
The landscaping element of the spread formula recognizes that all
properties within the City benefit from the maintenance of the
landscaping within public rightri -of -way and easements. These
benefits include aesthetic enjoyment, creation of a placement
living and working environment, do increase in general property
values, improved safety resulting from a regular tree trimming
program and improved street sweeping capabilities resulting from
trimming trees which may otherwise interface with street sweeping
operations. Because of the general benefit received, the cost is
spread equally along each parcel. A-) the CJ ty. This amount is shown
in the appendix.
SECTION St COST ESTIMATE
The estimated costs of operating the District are shown Appendix
I'D" of this Report.
The costs attributed to landscaping and the costs attributed to
lighting will be separately appointed, according to the formula,
and added together to constitute the total assessment for each
parcel.
Conclusion
In conclusion, it is our opinion that the assessments within
Lighting Maintenance Assessment. District No. AD -84 -2 are
apportioned by a formula that fairly distributes the net cost in
accordance with the benefits that are received.
ENGINEER'S REPORT SUBMITTED BY:
DWIGHT TRENCH & ASSOCIATES
Diamond Bar, California
APPENDIX
APPENDIX "A"
CITY OF NIOORPARK
Lighting Maintenance Assessment District
AD -r�, 4 -2
Lighting and Land:.cape A�;t of 1972
Tab e 1
Street Light::i.ng Formula
Use
Code Description
People
Use
Lighting
Total
Annual
Intensity
Security
Units
Assessment
0
1
Residential Vacant
Single Family-
0.00
0.('
0.25
0.25
$5.35
Level 1
0.50
0.25
2.00
$21.37
2
3
Mobile Home
Condo Per Unit
0.00
.G,
0.00
0.00
$0.00
4
Residential income
0.50
0.2
0.25
1.00
$21.37
5
(2 -4 Units)
Apartments (5 +)
0.50
0.50
0.2
0.25
1.00
$21.37
Per Unit
0.0
).20
0.75
$16.03
6
Single Family-
Level 2
0.50
O.0
0.20
0.75
$16.03
9
Mobile Home &
Trailer Park
0.50
0.
0.20
0.75
$16.03
Per Space
10
Commercial Vacant
0.00
O.Oi
0.25
0.25
$5.35
Land
11
Retail Stores,
Single Story
2.00
1.0
1.00
4.00
$85.48
12
Store & Office
Combination
2.00
1.0
1.00
4.00
$85.48
15
Shopping Centers
(Neighborhood)
4.00
1.01
1.50
6.50
$138.91
16
Shopping Centers
(Regional)
4.00
1.01
1.50
6.50
$138.91
17
Office Building
(1 Story)
1.00
1,.}+
1.00
3.00
$64.11
18
Office Building
(Multi- Story)
2.00
1 .. r,+
t . 00
4.00
00
$85.48
19
Retail Stores
(Multi- Story)
2.0o
1.0(
.o0
00 4.
$85.48
21
Restaurants &
Cocktail Lounges
3.00
1.((
1.00
5.00
$106.85
24
Banks, Savings &
Loans
1.00
1.(:'(
x.00
3.00
$64.11
25
Service Stations
2.00
1.,0
1.00
4.00
$85.48
26
Auto Sales, Repair
2.00
1. 0
1.00
4.00
$85.48
Storage, Rental
30
Industrial land
0.00
r.
0.25
0.25
$5.35
Vacant
31
Light
Manufacturing
3.00
1.::.0
1.00
5.00
$106.85
32
Warehousing
2.00
1.>0
1.00
4.00
$85.48
33
Industrial Condos,
2.00
1.. " +)
1.50
5.00
$106.85
Co -Ops, PUD's
38
Mineral Processing
1.00
1. °::!)
1.00
3.00
$64.11
44
Truck Crops
0.50
0.5
0.25
1.00
$21.37
46
Pasture (Permanent)
0.50
0,45
0.25
1.00
$21.37
48
Poultry
0.50
0 213
0.25
1.00
$21.37
49
Flowers, Seed
Products
0.50
(J.i
0.25
1.00
$21.37
51
Orchards
0.50
IJ,`.i
0.25
1.00
$21.37
53
Field Crops, Dry
0.50
0.;'`
0.25
1.00
$21.37
54
Pasture of Graze,
55
Dry
Feed Lots
0.50
0.,a
0.25
1.00
$21.37
57
Tree Farms
0.50
0.50
0.y`>
0_25
0.25
1.00
$21.37
61
Theater
3.00
0.25
1,00
1.00
5.00
$21.37
$106.85
69
Parks
0.00
0
0.00
0.00
$0.00
70
Institutional
71
Vacant
Churches, Convent
0.00
O.M:,.
0.25
0.25
$5.35
Rectory
0.00
C). CF .
0.25
0.25
$5.35
72
Schools
0.00
0.0
0.00
0.00
$0.00
73
Colleges
0.00
Cr.O.
0.00
0.00
$0.00
78
Public Bldgs.,
0.00
0,c.
).00
0.00
$0.00
Museums, Firehouses,
Etc.
79
80
Flood Control
Misc.
0.00
O.C:)
0.00
0.00
$0.00
81
Vacant Lots
Utility Water
0.00
O�.0
).25
0.25
$5,35
83
Company
Petroleum & Gas
0.00
1.00
0.6)
0.00
0.00
$0.00
86
Water Rights, Pumps
0.00
0.5'i
0.0'e
J.50
).00
2.00
0.00
$42.74
$0.00
88
Highways & Streets
0,00
0.0s!
J.00
0.00
$0.00
91
Utility - Edison
0.00
0.0 =1
).00
0.00
$0.00
92
93
Telephone
S.P.R.R.
0.00
0.0
).00
0.00
$0.00
94
Undedicated
0.00
t)..')
).00
0.00
$0.00
Community Areas
95
(Condos)
State Property
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
$0.00
96
County Property
0.00
0.)"
O.00
0.00
$0.00
97
City Property
0.00
0.3f
().00
0.00
$0.00
99
Exempt
0.,(
().00
0.00
$0.00
0.00
0.)!
i.00
0.00
$0.00
APPENDIX "B"
CITY OF MOORPARF
Lighting Maintenance Assessment District
Number 1AD -84• -2
Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972
Landscape Formuli
The landscaping element of the spread for -mina is calculated in accordance
with the method described as follows:
Total Annual Cost a $9.85 per par -el
Notes:
1. In addition to the above landscape charge, 74 lots within Tract No.
2851' are assessed an additional landscape cost for a Ventura County
Flood Control Easement and portions of the interior tract entry
areas. The additional cost per lot is $137.61. The obligation
upon these lots is pursuant. o a condition of development.
2. In addition to the above landscape charge, 622 lots within Tract
2865 are assessed an additional landscape charge for the
maintenance of parkways and Tierra Rejada Road slope and street
scape areas within the trac-t. The additional cost per lot is
$75.96. The obligation uporl+--hese lots is pursuant to a condition
of development.
3. In addition to the above landscape charge, 265 lots within Tract
No. 3032 are assessed an additional landscape charge for the
maintenance of an entry monument at Buttercreek Road and Los
Angeles Avenue. The addit.ic °iaa cost per lot is $9.31.
4. In addition to the above landscape charge, 220 lots within Tract
No. 3274 area assessed an additional landscape charge for the
landscape for the maintenanct.° of parkway areas along Williams Ranch
Road and Edison entries within PC-3, The additional cost per lot
is $19.44. The obligatiat ur,on these lots is pursuant to a
condition of development.
5. In addition to the above .landscape change, 217 lots within Tract
Nos. 3019 and 3525 are assessed an additional landscaping charge
for maintenance of Tierra Rejada Road slope and parkways and the
parkway on the west side of leach Hill Road between Williams Ranch
and Tierra Rejada Roads. 'TT additional cost per lot is $107.65.
The obligation upon thefe o'_:, i pursuant to a condition of
development.
6. In addition to the above landscape charge, 22 lots within Tract No.
3306 are assessed an additional landscape charge for the
maintenance of landscape area at the westerly terminus of Inglewood
Street. The additional cost per lot is $45.73. The obligation
upon these lots is pursuant *:> a condition of development.
q
APPENDIX "C"
CITY OF MOORPARK
Lighting Maintenance Assessment District
AD -84 -2
Lighting and Land:.Acape Act of 1972
Tab', e 3
Assessment Summary
Use
Landscape
Lighting
Total
Code
Description
Assessment
Assessment
Assessment
0
Residential
$9.85
$5.35
$15.20
Vacant
1
Single Family -
Level 1
9.85
21.37
31.22
2
Mobile Home
0.00
0.00
0.00
3
Condo Per Unit
9.85
21.37
31.22
4
Residential
Income (2 -4 Units
9.85
21.37
31.22
5
Apartments (5 +)
9.,35
16.03
25.88
Per Unit
6
Single Family -
Level 2
9.85
16.03
25.88
9
Mobile Home and
9.85
16.03
25.88
Trailer park Per
Space
10
Commercial Vacant
9.85
5.35
15.20
Land
11
Retail Stores,
9.85
85.48
95.33
Single Story
12
Store & Office
9.85
85.48
95.33
Combination
15
Shopping Centers
9.85
:138.91
148.76
(Neighborhood)
16
Shopping Centers
9.85
138.91
148.76
(Regional)
17
Office Building
9.85
64.11
73.96
(1- Story)
18
Office Building
9.85
85.48
95.33
(Multi- Story)
19
Retail Stores
9.85
85.48
95.33
(Multi -Story
21
Restaurants &
9.85
106.85
116.70
Cocktail Lounges
24
Banks, Savings &
Loans
9.85
64.11
73.96
25
Service Stations
9.85
85.48
95.33
Use
Description
Landscape
Lighting
Total
Code
Assessmer ,
A: ;sessment
Assessment
26
Auto Sales, Repair
9.85
x35.48
95.33
Storage, Rental
30
Industrial Land
9.85
5.35
15.20
Vacant
31
Light Manufacturing
9.85
1:16.85
116.70
32
Warehousing
9.85
85.48
95.33
33
Industrial Condos,
Co -ops, PUD's
9.85
106.85
116.70
38
Mineral Processing
9.85
54.11
73.96
44
Truck Crops
9.85
21.37
31.22
46
Pasture (Permanent)
9.85
?.1.37
31.22
48
Poultry
9.85
21.37
31.22
49
Flowers, Seed
9.85
?1.3`1
31.22
Production
51
Orchards
9.85
11.37
31.22
53
Field Crops, Dry
9.85
21.37
31.22
54
Pasture of Graze,
9.85
21.37
31.22
Dry
55
Feed Lots
9.85
21.37
31.22
57
Tree Farms
9.85
21.37
31.22
61
Theater
9.85
106.85
116.70
69
Parks
0.00
0.00
0.00
70
Institutional
9.85
5.35
15.20
Vacant Land
71
Churches, Convent,
9.85
5.35
15.20
Rectory
72
Schools
0.00
0.00
0.00
73
Colleges
0.00
0.00
0.00
78
Public Bldgs.,
Museums, Firehouses,
Etc.
0.00
0.00
0.00
79
Flood Control
0.00
0.00
0.00
80
Misc. Vacant Land
9.85
5.35
15.20
81
Utility Water Co.
0.00
0.00
0.00
83
Petroleum & Gas
9.85
42.74
52.59
86
Water Rights, Pumps
0.00
0.00
0.00
88
Highways & streets
0.00
0.00
0.00
91
Utility - Edison
0.00
0.00
0.00
92
Telephone
0.00
0.00
0.00
93
S.P.R.R.
0.00
0.00
0.00
94
Undedicated
Community Areas
(Condos)
0.00
0.00
0.00
95
State Property
0.00
0.00
0.00
96
County Property
0.00
0.00
0.00
97
City Property
0.00
0.00
0.00
99
Exempt
0.00
0.00
0.00
Actual assessment amounts may vary dine '.:.a discrepancies between use codes and
actual property uses.
� ��" i
• — --mot _�, __`, � �.�
i { t i �_ ,
r
�, ;
^_� ..,�_ • .�. 1
_._��' T ---- �
r. a
� � r -r..;
� 1.. I
.�cz•iarirrrn �
r
1 l l
APPENDIX C
CITY OF MC ORPARK
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
AD-84-2
BUDGET ESTIMATE
FY 299f!91
STREET LIGHTING $200,000.00
ZONES OF BENEFIT
1. Tract No, 2851
A. Bambi /Benwood /Pecan 6,164.00
B. Flood Control Channel 4,019.00
2. Tract No. 2865 (Pacifica)
A. Christian Barrett &Spring 4,742.00
H. Tierra Rejada Slope /Streetscape
(Pacifica) 20,400.00
C. Tierra Rejada Slope /Streetscape
(Pardee) 20,625.00
D. Peach Hill (East Side) 1,475.00
3. Tract No, 3032
Buttercreek Entry 1,300.00
Peppermill 1,165.00
4. Tract No. 3274
Williams Ranch Road 4,275.00
5. Tract No. 3019 3025 (Warmington)_
A. Tierra Rejada Slope /Streetscape 22,100.00
B. Peach Hill (West Side) 1,260.00
6. Tract No. 3306 (Glenhaven
Streetscape 1,006.00
SUBTOTAL: $88,531.00
CITY WIDE
1. Campus Park Median (Griffin) 2851
& Collins Avenue
$ 3,704.00
2.
Campus Park Median
1,520.00
(A & R Development) 4170
3.
Campus Park Median (Marq. to Jul)
6,296.00
4.
Spring & Peach Hill (Marlborough)
1,470.00
5.
Tierra Rejada (N /O Harvester)
2,242.00
6.
Tierra Rejada (Spring to Peach H 11)
5,562.00
7.
Tierra Rejada (Peach Hill to Edir,ori)
6,787.00
8.
Tierra Rejada (Harvester to Br-idLio —)
1,643.00
9.
Pepper Tree Spraying
4,000.00
10.
Tree Removal /Replacement
12,000.00
11.
Tree Trimming
15,000.00
12.
Weed Abatement
6,000.00
13.
Misc. Improvements
15,000.00
$81,224.00
ADMINISTRATION
Engineering
4,000.00
Maintenance /Operations /Personnel
19,147.00
Contingency
1,853.00
SUBTOTAL:
25,000.00
FY
89/90 Carryover
(20,000.00)
GRAND TOTAL:
374,755.00
APPENDIX' "Y"
Appendix "F ", the Assessment Roll, shows the assessment upon each lot or
parcel (approximately 8350 parcels) within this District and is on file in
the Office of the City Clerk and Co�4nty Assessor. The Ventura County
Assessor's office no longer lists publi- utility easements on the Assessor's
Roll.
rpt \028 -2.dc