HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1990 0516 CC REG ITEM 08IPAUL W. LAWRASON, Jr.
Mayor
SCOTT MONTGOMERY
Mayor Pro Tom
ELOISE BROWN
Councilmember
CLINT HARPER, Ph.D.
Councilmember
BERNARDO M.PEREZ
Councilmember
LILLIAN KELLERMAN
City Clerk
TO:
FROM
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MOORPARK ITEM �..I.
PpK
Cyr
o
0
o-
M E M O R A N D I' M
The Honorable City (ounc i 1
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J.KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
RICHARD T. HARE
City Treasurer
Craig Phillips, Administrative Assistant C P
May 11, 1990 (for rJ mooting of 5- 16 -90)
AD -85 1
The Parks Maintenance Assessment. 1; strict. AD -85 -1) was formed in June
1985. Assessments in this distric` we +•e 1-vied in FY85 -86 and FY86 -87,
and again in FY89- -90. Two action r'r, ico d relative to AD -85 -1.
The first action is to approve .t, Fngine-r's Report (copy enclosed).
The report describes the parks tra !)e maintained in AD -85 -1 as well as
the method of assessment. Approv, f ih( report at.. this time enables
the hearing to be .,et but does tide �-�hange, to the budget,
proposed assessments, or method t pa e, i The maintenance to be
provided by this district inr.'u s, (ity' six parks and the
Community Center grounds but h., kiii ding. The proposed annual
assessment for a single family mF $26.90 This compares to
$33.08 in FY89 -90. The total t,dget for- this district is
$297,555.
The second action is to declare th
in the annual assessments for Al-i
receive objections to the work air
The law allows the public hear
regular scheduled meeting of }h,
be. heard as late as ,lune 20,
intention to make changes
x
'(1 set. a public hearing to
91 F, .rt „n o' the assessment district.
t.,.i�r place up until the last
r The public hearing could
As in past years staff recornmetH, iat the proposed assessment district
budget be revi�,wed it conjunct.i ,, , +,t 0 ,, roposed City budget.
The Honorable City Council
May 11, 1990
Page 2
Staff Recommendations
That the City Council:
1) adopt Resolution 90- app vin q t,h� AD -85 -1 Engineer's Report
for the fiscal year commencin,; i'v i 990 and ending June 30,
1990;
2) adopt Resolution 90- mak1 q certa n changes, ordering the
annual assessments, and fixing he ),hl c hearing for June 6,
1990; and
3) review the proposed budget fog 1 -85 n conjunction with the
Council's review of the propo-E FY90 -9' "ity Budget.
Enclosure: Engineer's Report for A[ �5 -I
Staff Report - Initia�t,:Ir Aid Pro, eedings
DCM.89565a
RESOLUTION '�C
A RESOLUTION OF THE- 11Y COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S
REPORT, FOR "PARKS MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. AD-F5-11 FIR T1,E FISCAL YEAR
COMMENCING JULY 1. '�3C, ,W1 NDING JUNE 30, 1991.
WHEREAS, by Resolution No �� -63;', the City Council ordered the
City Manager to cause to be prepay i ,ir Fnc;ineer's Report in accordance
with Article 4, Chapter 1, Pare ? lion 15 of the California
Streets and Highways Code; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to said k( ,IdLi,)n, the Engineer's Report was
filed with the City Clerk on the 1,-iv f 1990; and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk ha s,jhmit:?. d the report to the City
Council and the City Council ha w if w(-d and examined the report
as so submitted,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY )UNcI )( THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLC'4'
SECTION 1. The Enginee Report for "PARKS MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD -85 -1" f fho fiscal year commencing July 1,
1990 and ending June 30, 1991 el)cr'Od pursuant to Resolution No.
90 -632 filed with the City Clergy ., fl th day of February, 1990 is
hereby approved.
SECTION 2. That said Enci oe- Report may be further modified
or changed, pursuant to the prow )r- f- Section 22630 of the Streets
and Highways Code.
SECTION :?. The City Cle -•k a Jfy to the adoption of this
resolution.
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this
ATTEST:
City Clerk
(SEAL)
riay f - - 1990.
For Pardo Perez, Mayor
RESOLUTI (A '�() %()
A RESOLUTION OF THE
'I FY 'OVNCIL OF THE CITY
MOORPARK, CALI I'WN
I A , DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO MAKE
CERTAIN CHANGES AND TO
ORDER THE ANNUAL A,iSESSMENTS
FOR THE "PARKS
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT
HISTRICT NO. AD -85 -1"
FOR THE FISCAL YEAI
COMMEM ING JULY 1, 1990
AND ENDING JUNE 1
, 0q1 PURSUANT TO TIIE
LANDSCAPING AND P�
!l]'i I NK 'ACT OF 1972; AND
FIXING A TIME
'NPR I'A :F FOR HEARING
OBJECTIONS THERE?
ed ii < iid district
WHEREAS, pursuant to the I
vidnn, of the "Landscaping
and
Lighting Act of 1972 ", being Di vi
Am 19 Part 2 of
the Streets
and
Highways Code of the State of Cal.Wrnia.
Qe City Council
of the
City
of Moorpark by its Resolution Q
Wm W, proposed
to make certain
changes to the "PARKS MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
NO. AD -85 -1"
and
to extend the improvements specif
ed ii < iid district
for the fiscal
year commencing July 1, 1990 any` -r
i rp In, 10, 19911
ind
01h all improvements located
WHEREAS, by said Resolut bm 1. W 6 2, the City Council ordered
the City Manager to cause to ho ,r or 0 n Engineer's Report, pursuant
to Article 4, Chapter 1, Part �I -)n 19 of said Streets and
Highways Code; and
WHEREAS, the Engineer's Fein um, Irepared rind filed, and the
same was approved by the City n +i1 the day of ,
1990, by Resolution No.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY W911 K OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOW'
SECTION 1. That the pub Ii(
nier(-;t and convenience require and
it is the intention of the Cit) t<
ncil of the City of Moorpark to make
certain changes to the "Parks ar e
Ma no wi nice Assessment District No.
AD -85 -1" consisting of a singlo
y -vido district for the maintenance
and improvement of parks and "
a. " a" facilities within the City
and to order_ the extension of f>on
i ul r, creational facilities within
the City and to order the extcn:
1 0 , annual assessment for said
district for the fiscal year urea
Ai Am r1v 1, 1990 and ending June
30, 1991, pursuant to the Lands( -i
n,, i,d h i ght i ng Act of 1972, and to
levy and collect assessments A
0 maintenance and improvement
in accordance with said Act.
SECTION 2. That said pa' k
a i n unn i(e assessment district shall
specifically include the pare
01h all improvements located
therein, described ly and here
1 Pd within "Parks Maintenance
Assessment District No. AD -85-
SECTION
within said
particularly
entitled "Bo
District No.
day of
3. That the forr•h, it g des
Assessment Distri, t11"
described on a ma, ',) f c i
undary Map, City f k
AD- 85 -1 ", filed h�
- - - -._n 1990.
.ribed work is to he located
mnndary of which is mbre
the City Clerks office, and
Parks Maintenance Assessment
of the City Clerk on the
SECTION 4. That the colt towI, k,.t < ct m t i ntenance and improvement of
parks and recreational facilitie,, iti the )pinion of said City Council,
is of benefit to, and the said Ci i :()u,ic I hereby makes the expense of
the said maintenance and impror;c,mc htr;teahle upon, the district.
SECTION 5. Reference i
Engineer on file with the City C;i
and detailed description of- ih�
Assessment District and any zone,
upon assessable lots and parcels,
SECTION 6_ Notice is ho
, 1990, at the hour of 1, (4
City Hall of said City, located
and all persons having any o'aj„�
assessment district may appear <rt
be done or carried out or why
the fiscal year commencing Jtl
Protests must be in writing, -ri
with the City Clerl,- prior to t
protest shall state all ground
description sufficient to identi
SECTION 7. All the word
accordance with the Landscapin„
of Division 15 of the Stree!�
California.
SECTION 8. The City Clore
be given by causing the Resoliri
mailed in the manner required
and highways Coda.
SECTION c). The City Clerl
resolution.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this
City Clerk
(SEAL)
DCM.89561
hereby made to the report of the
k iiInd 01)(In to inspection, for a full
mitr (v omionts, the boundaries of the
111Ir f, r, and the proposed assessments
it,] w thin the District.
,vc it that on the day of
tit it the Council Chambers of the
`0 �t(,orpark Avenue, Moorpark, any
ir<< 1 the work or extent of the
�.t -)w I,,nse why said work should not
t i,t should not be extended for
9 and ending June 30, 1991.
nt; `)( f i led by the property owner
t, 11 . ion of the hearing and such
�( )jection -ind shall contain a
l,erc,,n proposed shall be done in
i 1 -ght i ng Act. of 1972, being Part 2
'I, t, � Ph ways Code of the State of
9 t 1 n�,e notice of the hearing to
itention to be published and
r! Division 15 of the Streets
t i fy to the adoption of this
19M)
Rernardo Perez, Mayor
PAUL W. LAWRASON, Jr.
Mayor
SCOTT MONTGOMERY
Mayor Pro Tern
ELOISE BROWN
Councilmember
CLINT HARPER, Ph.D.
Councilmember
BERNARDO M.PEREZ
Councilmember
LILLIAN KELLERMAN
City Cleric
MOORPARK
M E M 0 R A N 1. U M
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Susan Cauldwell, Administrative Assistant
DATE: February 1, 1990
`T
1 i E
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J.KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
RICHARD T. HARE
City Treasurer
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL
ASSESSMENTS FOR THE "PARKS MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. AD- 85 -1", AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF
THE ENGINEER'S REPORI
Annual assessments for the Park Maintenance Assessment District
(AD -85 -1) are determined through ,.,he preparation of the Engineer's
Report. This report (which is rry(,uired by State law) evaluates the
benefits received by various c:la,:,e,, of properties and spreads the
costs according to an approved method of distribution. The estimated
annual maintenance costs and requ site maintenance program are also
part of the report. A copy of th- Frgineer's Report for the current
year has been previously provided the Council.. This report explains
the method of spread and related m..ttt} ^7 Assessments were levied for
the FY89 -90 fiscal year. Asse�sm -,t, for AD -85 -1. were not levied in
FY87 -88 or FY88 -89
After submission of the Enginee
conduct a public hearing in Ito,
protests, comments concerning the
pertinent matters. The Engineer
assessments levied prior to July 1.
extended to no later than the t.h.l, ,
the County Auditor. At this U,,
meeting the July 1 date..
s Report, the City Council must
May or early June to consider
osts,
method of spread and other
Report. must be approved and the
IJnder state law, this date may be
Monday in August if authorized by
i' dogs riot, foresee a problem
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA
City Council Meeting
of , �? - % 196 9G
ACTION: �� e
/ U
v .�
The Honorable City Council
February 1, 1990
Page 2
The preparation of the Engineer's
Report does not compel the City
Council to order the assessments.
PreparatJ on of this report affords
the Council the opportunity to rf-,iew
the proposed parks budget and
maintenance program for FY9O -91 anc
comparF it to the proposed levels
of assessments as part of the annual
nudyet. eliberation - :.
The cost for preparation of the IEngineer's
keport has been included in
the adopted budget for FY89 -90. ThN
purpose of the proposed Resolution
is to formally authorize initiatioi
of the process and to direct the
City Manager to secure the service-
of �i gr,lified engineer to prepare
the necessary Engineer's Report.
As the Council may recall, Dwight
French and Associates submitted a
two -year proposal in 1989 for the pr- eparation of the Engineer's Report
for AD -85 -1. The cost for the FYP9 -90 report was $3,700 plus direct
expenses. The cost for the FY9'
9' report is $2,900 plus direct
expenses.
The FY89 -90 budget includes $3,701
ft,r Preparation of the Engineer's
Report for AD -85 -1 fore FY90 -91.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Adopt Resolution No.
nitiatirg Proceedings for AD -85 -1
and Ordering Preparation of Eno
neer',7 Peport.
2. Authorize the City Manager to
ecure the services of Dwight French
and Associates to prepare th,,
Engineer's Report for the Parks
Maintenance Assessment Districp
(AD -85 -1) at a cost not to exceed
$3,700. Any cost above $3, 70t
w,11 rejuire prior approval of the
City Council.
SC/Is
ADM.90126B
May 9, 1990
ENGINEER'S REPORT
CITY OF MOORPARK
PARKS MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
NO. AD� -85 -1
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
PREPARED BY:
DWIGHT FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
706 td. DIAMOND BAR BLVD.
:)7 AN OND BAR, CA 91765
CITY OF MOOIZPARK
Engineer's Deport
Parks Maintenance Assessment District No.
AD- 8!5 -'_
Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972
For Fiscal Year :_990 -1991
F
This report is prepared pursuant tc City Council action taken at
their regular meeting of April, 199) to extend this District for
the fiscal year commencing July 1, x.990 and ending June 30, 1991
in compliance with the requirement.. ofd Article 4, Chapter 1,
"Landscaping Act of 197211, bein��i 2 of Division 15 of the
California Streets and Highways
This report is an update of ain xist.ing city -wide Assessment
District. The purpose for the dis ~r_ict is to provide operating
funds for the continued maintenancc and improvements of existing
and planned City operated public parks.
SECTION 2 DESCRIPTION OF THL- 1f"UQYEMENTS TO BE MAINTAINED
The following City Parks are to k)e iint:ained under this District
effective July 1, 1990:
CAMPUS PARK
PAUL GRIFFIN SR. PARK
COMMUNITY CENTER
MONTE VISTA NATURE PARK
GLENWOOD PARK
PEACH HILL PARK
NORTH VILLAGE PARK
LA COLONIA
In addition, the City also owns additional unimproved acreage for
park purposes designated on the attached boundary map as locations
2 and 6. Only minimal cost fc >r weed control, if any, is
anticipated for these two location:,-; in fis(!al year 1990 -1991.
The maintenance and improvement of ,11 above mentioned parks shall
include but not be limited to the f ilowin�T:
1 . Mowing and edging of a i 1 urf ai ,;as
2. Litter pickup.
3. Weeding as required Hiit an emphasis on a monthly
timetable.
4. Irrigation as required,
5. Fertilizing of all vegetation as each species requires.
6. Pruning so as to not inhibi# the natural growth
characteristics of the plint
7. Cleaning existing facilit .�.es to be clean and free of all
debris. Minor repairs shall be needed.
8. Vector control at the fiz.;t xndi�-ation of existence.
9. Maintaining lights, playgwound equipment, playcourts and
public restrooms.
10. Installing park or recreational improvements, including
but not to drainage, sidewalks, land preparation and the
maintenance and servicir, -; of sa ri improvements.
SECTION I ASSESSMENT ROLL
All parcels of real property affected are lasted on the "Assessment
Roll ", Exhibit A, which will be on file in City Hall with the City
Clerk, and is made a part hereof by reference. These parcels are
more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with
Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code which are on file in
the office of the Ventura County Asfiessor in the County Government
Center Administration Building, BOC S. Victoria Avenue, Ventura,
California and which are also ma,�le i p.tri. �iereof by reference.
MAO XUDKONKNO-10
The estimated costs of operating ttie prop(::)sed District are shown
in Appendix "B" of this Report.
The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, in Section 22573, states
that "The net amount to be assesaed upon the lands within an
assessment district may be apport3laned by any formula or method
which fairly distributes the new amount among all assessable lots
or parcels in proportion to the c t;t imat.ed benefits to be received
by each such lot or parcel from th( impt :ovementn."
The method and formula of benefit spread recognizes that every
property within the City of Moorpark benefits from public parks and
recreation facilities.
The method of spreading maintenance osts is based upon the "people
use attributed to each land use within the City. This method was
chosen because the benefit received by having park facilities is
directly proportionate to the number of people generated by each
land use. Recognizing that residential land uses within the City
derive a higher degree of benefit: than non- residential land uses,
the formula was subdivided into t:wo main groups, with residential
land uses contributing in 75% of the assessment and non - residential
uses being assessed for the remainin_1 25% of the maintenance costs.
The benefits to residential land uses are clear. The residents of
the City utilize the parks during their leisure hours. Benefits
to non - residential property include such items as offering
employees the opportunity to utilik;e the parks during lunch time
and after hours, as well as provi(ling an aesthetic environment
which attracts potential employees .ntD the area.
The "people use" factors utilized it the assessment district spread
formula are shown in Appendix "A"
In conclusion, it is our opinion th,it the<-issessments within Parks
Maintenance Assessment District No AD -85-1 are apportioned by a
formula that fairly distributes t.hc net cost to each lot or parcel
in accordance with the benefits thant are received.
ENGINEER'S REPORT SUBMITTED BY:
Harry C. Lorick
DWIGHT ;FRENCH & ASSOCIATES
APPENDIX
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Section 1
Authority for Repo:r ~;
1
Section 2
Description of Imp:ro %ements
to be Maintained
1
Section 3
Assessment Roll
2
Section 4
Estimate of Cost
2
Section 5
Method of Assessment.:,
2
Appendix
A
- Parks Maintenance Form is
Appendix
B -
Budget Estimate
Appendix
C --
Boundary Map
Appendix
D -
Assessment Roll
Appendix
E -
Resolutionf:
1j 115
APPEND "rX "A"
CITY OF MOORPARK
Parks Maintenance Assessment District No.
AD -85-
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972
Tab) e
Parks Maintenan�!e Formula
Use
People
Annual
Code
Description
Use
Assessment
0
Residential vacant
$
0.00
1
Single Family -
.00
$
26.90
Level 1
2
Mobile Home
3
$
0.00
3
Residential Income
i.00 per
$
20.18
Per
unit
unit
4
Residential Income
3.00 per
$
20.18
per
(2 -4 Units)
urlit
unit
5
Apartments (5 +)
3.00 per
$
20.18
per
unit
unit
6
Single Family -
4.00 per
$
26.90
Level 2
9
Mobile Home and
3.00 per
$
20.18
per
Trailer Parks
space
spaoe
10
Commercial Vacant
�
$
0.00
11
Retail Stores, Single
3 „00 per
$
121.25
per
Story
parcel
'1
12
Store & Office
3 w)
$
121.25
(Combination)
15
Shopping Centers
10,00
$
404.17
(Neighborhood)
Use
People
Annual '
Code
I?ascriptiOn
Usk
Assessment
16
Shopping Centers
30.Ot
$1,212.51
(Regional)
17
Office Building
3.0c;!
$
121.25
(1 Story)
18
Office Stores
6.00 per
$
242.50 per
(Multi-Story)
narc::e I
parcel
19
Retail Stores
6.00 per
$
242.50 per
(Multi - Story)
aarce 1
parcel
21
Restaurants &
3.00
$
121.25
Cocktail Lounge
24
Banks, Savings &
3.00
$
121.25
Loans
25
Service Stations
3.0(]
$
121.25
26
Auto Sales, Repair
1. ,c
$
40.42
30
Industrial Vacant
C'
$
0.00
Land
31
Light Manufacturing
12.00
$
485.00
32
Warehousing
4.00
$
161.67
33
Industrial Condos,
3.00
$
121.25
Co -Ops, PUD's
38
Mineral Processing
3.00
$
121.25
44
Truck Crops
2.0C
$
80.83
46
Pasture (Permanent)
2.00
$
80.83
48
Poultry
2.00
$
80.83
49
Flowers, Seed
2.0C
$
80.83
Production
51
Orchards
2.00
$
80.83
53
Field Crops, Dry
2.00
$
80.83
54
Pasture of Graze,
2.00
$
80.83
Dry
55
Food Lots
2,00
$
80.83
10
Use
People
Annual
Code
Description
U t3e
8sscssment
61
Theater
2.01
$
80.83
69
Parks
$
0.00
70
Institutional Vacant
$
0.00
Land
71
Churches, Convent,
$
0.00
Rectory
72
Schools
�.
$
0.00
73
Colleges
(
$
0.00
78
Public Bldgs.,
(
$
0.00
Firehouses, Museums,
Etc.
79
Flood Control
(
$
0.00
80
Miscellaneous Vacant
(
$
0.00
Land
81
Utility Water Company t'
$
0.00
83
Petroleum & Gas
1.)0
$
40.42
86
Water Rights, Pumps
c
$
0.00
88
Highways & Streets
C
$
0.00
91
Utility Edison
(
$
0.00
92
Telephone
C
$
0.00
93
S.P.R.R.
C
$
0.00
94
Undedicated
0
$
0.00
Community Condo
Development
95
State Property
0
$
0.00
96
County Property
C;
$
0.00
97
City Property
G
$
0.00
99
Exempt
(I
$
0.00
Actual Assessment amount may vary c1 to discrepancies between use
codes and actual property uses.
APPENDIX B"
CITY OF MOORPARK
Parks Maintenance AssesE;ment District No.
AD -85-
Landscape and Light1ig Act of 1972
BUDGET ESTIMATE
Fiscal Year 1'907199
Park Sites $ 189,395.00
Engineering costs 3,700.00
Maintenance and Operation/Personnel ^osts 159,720.00
Peach Hill Park Revenue (4,860.00)
Community Center Revenue (25,000.00)
Carryover (25,000.00)
Total Amount to be Funded by
District (FY 1990 -1991) $ 2971955.00
.,�,
t
- �I
\�
� � ♦ �
,...:..
U��6� _ ,I
�:
,z
r
t
��
i
"�
APPEND I )h "I)"
Appendix "D ", the Assessment Roll, Bhows the assessment upon each
lot or parcel (approximately 8350 parcels) within this District and
is on file in the Office of the City Clerk and County Assessor.
The Ventura County Assessor's offic(y no longer lists public utility
easements on the Assessor's Roll,