HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1990 0516 CC REG ITEM 11G • MOORPARK
ITEM + (a
PAUL W. LAWRASON,Jr. ,aKOkos STEVEN KUENY
;OORPARK, CALIFORNIA CH JaKANE
Mayor
SCOTT MONTGOMERY
Mayor Pro Tem 040W A CIty C I Meeting City Attorney
ELOISE BROWN `t0�� of / 1fRICK RICHARDS,A.I.C.P.
Councilmember o v r m �> Director of
' ' .L '
CLINT HARPER, Ph.D. �° ACTION:J°,,� � R. DENNIS DELZEITommunity t
Councilmember
BERNARDO M. PEREZ City Engineer
Councilmember By /t, JOHN ChiefV.of Police
PIE
LILLIAN KELLERMAN
City Clerk RICHARD T. HARE
City Treasurer
MEMORANDUM
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Craig Phillips, Administrative Assistant Cp
DATE: May 7, 1990 (City Council Meeting May 16, 1990)
SUBJECT: Approval of Actions to Initiate Provisions of the
California Integrated Waste Management Act of
1989 (AB 939) ; and Approval of Supplemental
Budget Request
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW
The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB
939) established aggressive source reduction, composting and
recycling requirements which are applicable to all general
purpose local governments throughout the State of California.
A diversion rate of 25% of all solid waste from landfills or
transformation facilities must be attained by January 1, 1995
via source reduction, composting and recycling activities.
A 50% diversion rate must be attained by the year 2000.
These State mandates represent the need for a significant
increase in waste reduction, composting and recycling
activities for nearly every jurisdiction in the State.
Penalties of up to $10, 000 per day may be assessed if a
jurisdiction fails to comply with the requirements of AB 939.
Components of Source Reduction and Recycling Elements
In order to achieve and maintain these required reductions,
comprehensive programs must be developed and implemented
which are consistent with the solid waste management
hierarchy. Cities are being required to prepare the first
component of their integrated waste management plans, the
Source Reduction and Recycling Elements (SR & RE's) by
December 31, 1990 to allow time for environmental review
(CEQA) . Each City's SR & RE will then be reviewed by the
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529-6864
PAUL W. LAWRASON, Jr.
Mayor
SCOTT MONTGOMERY
Mayor Pro Tern
ELOISE BROWN
Councilmember
CLINT HARPER, Ph.D.
Councilmember
BERNARDO M.PEREZ
Councilmember
LILLIAN KELLERMAN
City Clerk
MOORPARK ITEM
M E M O R A N D U M
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J.KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
RICHARD T. HARE
City Treasurer
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Craig Phillips, Administrative Assistant CP
DATE: May 7, 1990 (City Council Meeting May 16, 1990)
SUBJECT: Approval of Actions to Initiate Provisions of the
California Integrated Waste Management Act of
1989 (AB 939); and Approval of Supplemental
Budget Request
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW
The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB
939) established aggressive source reduction, composting and
recycling requirements which are applicable to all general
purpose local governments throughout the State of California.
A diversion rate of 25% of ali solid waste from landfills or
transformation facilities musr . bE� attained by January 1, 1995
via source reduction, composl:inq and recycling activities.
A 50% diversion rate must. I attained by the year 2000.
These State mandates reprE: E,:;t the need for a significant
increase in waste reduct.,.(ui, composting and recycling
activities for nearly eve -, jurisdiction in the State.
Penalties of up to $l0, O()o! ;_per da} may be assessed if a
jurisdiction fails to comp7;.y th the requirements of AB 939.
Components of Source Reducfi _L ri and I,ecvclinq Elements
In order to achieve and mairYt..tin these required reductions,
comprehensive programs must be de, ✓eloped and implemented
which are consistent wit}. the ;solid waste management
hierarchy. Cities are be:Lnq rc�quir f 2d to prepare the first
component of their integrate. wash:. management plans, the
Source Reduction and Recyc. ng Elements (SR & RE's) by
December 31, 1990 to allow imf2 f-r environmental review
(CEQA). Each City's SR & I I wa1 then be reviewed by the
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark Califomia 93021 (805) 529 -6864
The Honorable City Council
May 7, 1990
Page 2
State and vocal agencies for 'EQA compliance, adopted by the
City, and submitted to the Co my for review by July 1, 1991.
Each SR & RE must contain irh, following components:
A. A solid waste generation analysis, including an
assessment of current waste idiversion rates.
B. A source reductioii component including an
implementation scheduie and an evaluation of "rate
structures" designed , :) reduce wastes generated.
C. A recycling componen, including an implementation
schedule.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
A composting componen� .ncl�iding an implementation
schedule.
A special waste (inclu,i ing asbestos and sewage sludge)
component.
A household hazardous waste component, including an
implementation schedu.�.
A disposal facility capacity component, identifying
existing capacity and projec-:ing facility needs for
fifteen years.
An education and public information component,
identifying waste generators and targeting groups for
education /information !ampaigns.
A funding component Identifying projected costs,
revenues and revenue .iurces
An integration componnt, integrating the foregoing
components and how hey will achieve AB 939's
diversion mandates.
Waste Generation Analyses
A critical component of the ;R & RE's is an initial Waste
Generation Analysis (Component A, above) , which must include
six months of seasonal data on eight (8) different waste
categories (paper, plastics, glass, metals, .yard waste, other
organics, other waste, special waste) and thirty -four (34)
different sub - categories of -vaste from four (4) different
sources (residential, commer-cial, industrial and other
sources). To meet the December 15, 1990 deadline for
completion of the Waste Gener <,, ion Ansalysis, and the December
The Honorable City Council
May 7, 1990
Page 3
31st deadline for SR & RE pr
review of the draft document,
no later than June 15, 1990.
study is late May, 1990. A
the County of Ventura at thi
t ?paration and allow for timely
the study must be initiated by
I'he targeted start -time for the
onsultant is being selected by
time.
Since the preparation of maiiy of the element components
hinges on data gathered dur:inc:::I the Waste Generation Analysis,
the time lines for initiating these components are incumbent
on the completion of the fr::1 -. wasto_ i stream sampling.
Other Components of the SR & iZE
Components "B" through "F" _ the SR & RE also must each
establish specific component objectives over the short and
medium term; target the tyl::;es of waste being addressed;
describe in detail current ,,aste disposal activities and
identify improper waste dispc,;ai activities to be phased out
over the short (1991 -1995) and medium (1996 -2000) term;
evaluate alternatives for overall impact, practicality, and
consistency with policy and et°er regulatory programs; select
the specific program to �e implemented; develop an
implementation timetable affil, identify tasks, responsible
parties, and funding source:., an3, establish the methods by
which annual monitoring wi l )C:3.11.
As mentioned previously, the ;our-ce Reduction and Recycling
Element must be prepared by tre City by December 31, 1990 to
ensure adequate review for c,mplianc..e under the California
Environmental Quality Act (Chl,,A). r Sherefore, hearings must
be held and drafts of the F'Aement must be circulated for
review by the State and locz�_I agenc-ies prior to the July 1,
1991 deadline for adoption of ;,ihma.ttal to the County.
Current Status of_ Planning
The initial steps towards, complying with the first
significant requirement of AB 9393 -_. the development of the
Source Reduction and Recycl:in( . Element -- have been initiated
by the County Waste Commissi::) which has been designated as
the Local Task Force for (._�veloping and implementing a
County -wide Integrated Waste Management Plan (the CIWMP) .
The Technical Advisory Commit-ee of the Waste Commission, on
which the City is repres -rated by the Administrative
Assistant, has developed dr,r' County -wide goals, policies
and programs which were ac_�el: ed by the Commission on April
12, 1990. These have beer- .) >v i otjs l y provided to the City
Council. The draft document s :;ub-lect to amendment by the
Commission pending the comr,1 t:,cn C ^f the Waste Generation
Analyses, which may have ar a(--t the Goals!, Policies or
The Honorable City Council
May 7, 1990
Page 4
Programs.
Staffing levels required to administer and implement the
programs delineated by the various components of the SR and
RE, and to adhere to the ann.zal monitoring requirements of
AB 939 are at this time unkn(..in.
Memorandum of Understanding__ Waste_ Generation Analysis and
SR & RE
Because of the short time frame for preparation of the SR &
RE, most cities are retainin <; consultants to conduct Waste
Generation Analyses. Based on experiences of other cities
in executing contracts for this type of study, and a shortage
of qualified consultants, most cities preparing individual
waste generation analyses have budgeted between $50,000 and
$80,000 for this component alone. The cost of preparing
complete, individualized So,irce Reduction and Recycling
Elements is expected to be .Tnificantly greater.
However, AB 939 provides for joint preparation of all or
portions of the SR & RE's. Wh le different jurisdictions may
be at different levels (;f progress in meeting the
implementation requirements ii:)r a complete SR & RE, certain
components lend themselves a cooperative effort between
jurisdictions with the beneii.t of shared costs. This is
especially true in the case ci Waste Generation Analyses in
those instances where the maiori -ty <Df several communities'
wastes are sent to the same landfill; it is particularly
applicable in the case of Ventura County since the Waste
Commission has endorsed t. -re levelopment of a standardized
waste characterization prot(c 1
The Cities of Moorpark, Thc: >usand Oaks and Simi Valley
appointed elected representatives to the an County Wasteshed
Task Force. Mayor Lawrasor _s the City's representative.
The County of Ventura has recently joined with the three
cities to develop a Memorandur, of Understanding (MOU) for the
purpose of cooperative preparKt,,ion of each City's SR & RE for
consideration by each jurisdict-on. An important initial
result of the MOU would bE� -;ri,ired casts of preparing Waste
Generation Analyses, which Mrould oe the basis for the
development of Source RedLc,: , )n and Recycling Elements for
each of the jurisdictions. is estimated that the cost of
preparing a joint: Waste Ge -E :.t t :.or,, F. ial.ysis is $50,000.
Staff from the Cities and :.'ccity met on April 27, 1990, and
again on April 30th, to prepare a draft of the MOU and Scope
of Work (Exhibit A) . This (lrc ` t MOU 'v.,as reviewed by the East
County Wasteshed Task Force , 1990, and approved with
The Honorable City Council
May 7, 1990
Page 5
minor modifications for submission to the City Councils and
Board of Supervisors. On May 2, 1990, the City Council
authorized the Mayor to send a letter to the Ventura County
Board of Supervisors requestir-kg the levy of a gate fee at the
Simi Valley Landfill and coafirminr.X the City's intent to
proceed with the preparation of the Waste Generation Study
in connection with the Count of Ventura and Cities of Simi
Valley and Thousand Oaks.
Because of the significant differences between the Cities in
terms of progress towards meeting the requirements of AB 939,
careful consideration has been given to scoping the project
to avoid duplication of effort, and to developing the
appropriate funding mechanisms based on the need to
cooperatively develop the el.finents.
Components of the MOU
The draft MOU is divided into even specific Articles. These
are summarized as follows:
Article 1 - Definitions: his Article defines the terms
used in the memorandum in nformance with the definitions
section contained in the regulations established by the
California Integrated West., Management Board for AB 939
Plans.
Article 2 - Coordinated Planninq Activity: This article
establishes the purpose of the MOU as providing a means to
prepare SR & RE's that w -iI, form the basis for integrated
waste management in the Planning area. Specific planning
tasks include: Coordinatin(.; planning among the parties to
conduct the waste generat..on study; conducting a waste
diversion analysis; developing area -wide diversion
strategies; assessing the long range disposal needs for
residual solid waste a sposal; coordinating joint
environmental assessments f.)r the completed SR & RE's; and
developing options for int- ..carated waste management programs
for the planning area.
Article 3 - Administration and Funding: This article
establishes the means of funding the cooperative planning
effort for the East County &cc-ea. Funds for the coordinated
Planning would be derived via .a mandated fee ($1 45 /Ton)
imposed at the Simi Valley Landfill; this fee would be set
based on a projected funding requirement for the regional
effort. An advance contribution from each of the cities
for the purpose of funding the Waste Generation Analysis
would be reimbursed. Fift-- `Phousand Dollars is provided
to each party for adminir ;t.�- � vc- o%ersight of the planning
The Honorable City Council
May 7, 1990
Page 6
effort, and $250,000 would be allocated to the County for
the preparation of the SIR RE's for each of the parties.
The Article requires that e ich of the parties undertake an
effort to ensure that the historic percentage of waste
disposal at the Simi Valle,. Landfill be maintained.
Article 4 - Adoption of !Drocrrams and Elements: This
Article establishes the right of any of the parties to
adopt its own SR & RE and implementation programs, while
requiring that the partik--� agree that this effort be
coordinated.
Article 5 - Amendments Term and Termination: This Article
sets the effective date of the MOU as the date on which it
is executed by all of the parties, and the termination date
as July 1, 1991, unless all parties agree to an extension.
The article also allows for withdrawal from the MOU upon
sixty (60) days notice; precludes any party that withdraws
from the MOU from being :eimbur.sed; and establishes a
mechanism for disbursemen+- �f fees collected in excess of
actual costs.
Article 6 - Statutory Aut:hor-ity and Liability: This
Article recognizes the sepax�te Liabilities and authorities
of the parties.
Article 7 - Notices: This �.rticle establishes procedures
and contacts for notices Fn' suant. to the MOLT.
Scope of Work
As an attachment to the MOU, County and City staff have
developed a workscope outli.ni�)g eighteen various work tasks
to be accomplished, either. L;, staff or by the consultants
when preparing the SR & RE'-c.
These tasks include provi(ting a description of the
jurisdictions, jurisdictional demographics, and, solid waste
management practices and regulations; planning and
administering the waste generation analysis; conducting a
waste diversion analysis; preparing the source reduction,
recycling, composting, speci,il waste, household hazardous
waste, public education, disposal capacity, funding and
integration components; prepa -ing administrative drafts and
CEQA documentation for rev( and, completing the final
document.
The Honorable City Council
May 7, 1990
Page 7
Notification to California_In~eor.ated Waste Management Board
Pursuant to Section 18762(b) �f the "Planning Guidelines and
Procedures for Preparing, Rev __sing, and Amending County -wide
Integrated Waste Management Plans ", established by the
California Integrated Waste Management Board under the
authority of AB 939, a jurisdiction must submit written
documentation to the Board cr its designation of an agency
responsible for preparation of its SR & RE. This
notification must occur within thirty (30) days of the date
on which the designation takf s place.?.
Upon the Council's approval. c. the MOU for joint preparation
of the SR & RE's, staff will prepar.ra a letter notifying the
State that the County of Venn „ira .s the designated preparer
of Moorpark's SR & RE.
Letter of Request to the Coup, r' of Ventura Regarding Mandated
Fee
Section 41901 of the Publ c Resources Code authorizes
jurisdictions to impose fees -n amounts sufficient to pay the
costs of preparing, adopting and implementing an integrated
waste management plan. Fees allowed under this section must
be used to pay the actual c:_st. of preparing, adopting and
implementing the plan. It h<s.s been determined that a $1.45
per ton fee imposed at the Sir, i Valley Landfill will generate
the required funds to pay foi the SR b” RE. The fee would be
effective July 1, 1990.
In order to implement the mandated fee at the Simi Valley
Landfill, the Cities must request the County to impose the
fee pursuant to the provision: of the County's 1989 agreement
with Waste Management for landfill operations. Pursuant to
the May 2, 1990 City Council ;action, the attached letter was
sent to the County of Venturi requesting the imposition of
a $1.45 per ton fee at the Sir -A Valley Landfill (Exhibit B).
Supplemental Budget Request::
Given the short time -frame f c_- initiation of the SR & RE's,
each of the parties to thf MOU is expected to make a
reimbursable advance to t;h,e i.nitiai planning effort. The
contribution will be reimbur�_,able after collection of fees
at the Simi Valley Landfill',_. To accomplish this, staff has
included a request for $1),.1010 Supplemental Budget
appropriation.
The Honorable City Council
May 7, 1990
Page 8
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES
Upon review and considerat e~ of the above, the following
alternatives are available:
1. To approve the execution of a MOU among the cities of
Moorpark, Simi Valley, Thousand Oaks and the County
of Ventura for cooperative Solid Waste Management
Planning for East Ventura County and direct staff to
notify the Californi_ Integrated Waste Management
Board that the County of Ventura is the designated
preparer of Moorpark' SR & ]RE;
2. To approve a $10,000 ipplemental Budget Request; or
3. To direct staff to to };cy alternative action including
pursuing these mandat+ > on its own.
SUMMARY
AB 939 requires action by Cities and Counties to initiate
comprehensive planning efforts for integrated waste
management. Local plans mus° he developed and approved by
December 31, 1990.
The East Ventura County Cites of Moorpark, Simi Valley,
Thousand Oaks and the County of Ventura, representing the
unincorporated areas in the +,ast.ern County, have formed an
East County Wasteshed Task Force, with the goal of executing
an MOU for coordinated solid waste planning. A draft MOU and
Scope of Work have been prepared for approval by the
respective City Councils and -he Board of Supervisors.
The parties to the MOU are expected to advance a proportional
share of the initial costs ,f this planning effort, with
reimbursement to occur frorn 1 fee imposed at the Simi Valley
Landfill.
Staff is recommending that tl,.. Council give approval to the
execution of the MOU and aut: :norize a $10,000 Supplemental
Budget Request as the ity's reimbursable advance
contribution to this effort This would be accomplished
through a $10,000 loan from 3eneraI Fund Reserves to the
Solid Waste Fund. The City c:uncil treated the Solid Waste
Fund on January 17, 1990 rra prev.ously loaned the Fund
$6,000 from General Fund
The Honorable City Council
May 7, 1990
Page 9
STAFF RECOMMENDATION (Roll C,sLl Vote)
It is recommended that the 7 '-:y C'cue.cil:
1. Approve the Memorandu of Understanding between the
Cities of Moorpark„ E >,mi Valley, Thousand Oaks, and
the County of Ventura for cooperative Solid Waste
Planning for East Ventura County and authorize the
Mayor to execute orl 1> hralf' of the City.
2. Direct staff to notify t-he California Integrated Waste
Management Board that the County of Ventura is the
designated preparer of the City's Source Reduction and
Recycling Element (S! RE` .
3. Approve the appropr iat . on of $10,000 from General Fund
Reserves as a loan °o the Solid Waste Fund and
authorize that expeni.itures be charged to Account
Number 058.4.160.641 �Ircfes Tonal Services).
CP:sc
573.per
Attachments
EXHIBIT.
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF VENTURA
AND THE CITIES OF MOORPARK, SIMI VALLEY, AND THOUSAND OAKS
FOR COORDINATED SOLID WASTE �'LANNTNG FOR EAST VENTURA COUNTY
This MEMORANDUM OF UNDERS'I'AN, IN(; is made this day
of , 1990 and is en'°:ered into by and between
the County of Ventura, City of Moorpark, City of Simi
Valley, and City of Thous,ind Oaks {referred to
collectively herein as "part e >") .
RE(,- LTALS
WHEREAS, each county, in cooperation with its respective
cities, is required pursuant to Put)lir. Resources Code, Sections 41700
et se q. and 41750 et se q. to prepai�-e a Countywide Siting Element and
a Countywide Integrated Waste Mana(dement plan; and
WHEREAS, Public Resources Code Sections 40900 et seq. require
the preparation and adoption of ci y and +::--aunty Source Reduction and
Recycling Elements in order to mee, :state mandated waste diversion
goals; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Public i,.esources Code, Section 41823,
counties and cities may enter into agreements for the purpose of
jointly preparing Source Reduct_o*i 3no Recycling Elements; and
WHEREAS, the parties determi.c,e that it would be to their mutual
advantage and to the public's bene;it: to coordinate their respective
planning of integrated waste managi-nert for eastern Ventura County
and funding related thereto,
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties elree a:: follows and enter into
this MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING >, "MCU" therein) :
ART a ('LE 1
DEFIP, 1TIONS
The following definitions sli l apply to `.his MOU:
COMPOSTING shall mean the controliP_I biological decomposition of
organic wastes that are separated : -cm the solid waste stream.
INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT shall ::pan a comprehensive program of
solid waste management that enccmp�.,isses SOURCE REDUCTION, RECYCLING,
COMPOSTING, PROCESSING and SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL for the PLANNING
AREA, consistent with the requiz-em, its of applicable state and
federal laws and regulations.
nhYDAT,�TEM FE ha'_ ill i1 rle`n E'E
_rT E x1,111 ✓33 E? }'
GilE'_ tit� _ t the
t: _at_E? 'I T1 C_Se i Dy
-V'=- nt11i7F1 =:t. ;7t' rE?C{ll `r ()1'
n -_Ith t:h _zupport 3_ =d c r3= (s nt c +1
.1 -1 C� t> _ti= o
�Iz l `I cirri `I''c tlSi3fl t' _' ti 1 r u int
-f
tt � rr-e t-
nenh U he wt _ ttI ,r �n.i
. , _ �f hE� ��,r_ti. i -lc ,,
=t_ =d : uT-1 2,71- 1.33 IC
= r2 +,0 1'y r = cC)r,t._; :Set- f';,r h
he- i }7 =.
near :klc?; n ::_ _cl It
.: ° , l_£ -4h,
de :luptl r.t an :rt_
_I; od _.,f M�EGRTT -FD- WA=
iir,j c�I ril:rF1' inc;;urii,,- c -he fIas b I
- i c:c) t s and envirl -n n_ental. - -
E FU' :-: t:i 1� =;E I 13$ Il it.,l'tt_ T]E't t is iirt
Iii.'. }.`c:.tlli f'.F e'j' "t
a [+tnsl'E
1= iiErj,I'IC14 i'_UDT a p,,-- e p l r i ;n
,r (..sE3ci 'qD _:: uI E►_ €_'TInrt
RECD'. ['I)+G PLUME: = .: iatlet car
.` nir c)r all of
'Pal-t l _ ` II(2). _t_ t).
_.rl_.l ode the _, _.ii al c1Ci:) 1t I2
} � erlerrta iC n rl__.- r event. . oE� _t
F
_"=loll Of WIV E; T�7�:�u , -�GIIC 'T r� AND
T_ 1' _ f
c = SOLI- t ItAS''1 p>'r'j cyt .
P A':-; _,A shr_11, rrclan t-- e-
3- -(1 urlirl °F rat- ed-- -=_r(a Lei
C ---_-Sl
'
- -p- - on r �
area i _: t�t� - c•t - =t` ti:r -
f: t.
Gc'I J =•i_X sha1_.1 r an t h
_on, t-_ 4tE�r -�rF
or I-,-. _' c._ _:1.:' --f SOT I
tCI'C'I LG ;- s'llal.j.- 1;-- 311 t.tt _ores. -_ r
c i)i l _ I1Cjk =jr 1n9. C:� _ _ __ss IICJ,
- caat�i'_fY , <lnd i -�- n.:�t-t -trine n t
�.
a= r: t - - cac�ul - :ilc��-r<�_,_se ._ 'cone
t�:11I rti -tI ;hull (
t =t]L _E:r�or�: ri lnI`eaztt i `he
Er:--n s,1 :racr rat ria_ i., w t -
ci, r - - consti
'_he
G- D t 1 If E?�lrl T t Pllt C
_txl Iid. any- Iiqu -d A7._astes, r --t
114i} t;ark _ n�aah� r_fuse,
_aper, �Ijhb. stl, ust :r'i i1
d,ast den ,li':.ion an i :� � ruc:ticn
aband'7;, -f `IE'_il 'I =:, ilrl_ 3_.'
t _ >_eof'�' I.i: -:a rded iE< aIld
Lndu�s t_t'la tppj I,31,c.j'<,, :F= ltiit_:_f.r =r;
'_Ch
_; __
I'E'. :Ej E>I" _ e 311C I 1r Cd
i i id_j -S' -_ Fah _ i --t,t tll- 2— dour
(E t ab _ c,r ar .i i_,rrI. -
C; -yy. 3 }7d nli - _ c cI _ : es f tf -
,1 `. r i is c ti r d ':�El_ d si?ra _ 1 id
i Is " :s not 1..e^
Sa i4aste.
:3C -- [� ,- ^E_ Ljl _ =t ; �T� _ - �' rt �
----------- -
f i � ll - _cs i't'.otl v, f � �D #'��` '�l -
- trntc, land,
-
= Buses
1 =F -- ` - -i2i -'1 sh l L lrE1an _.n, id
"Err' T( 211erlt _ran or ,}any p> _ "E';�
cach_- >f= '_110 p;Lrt_i_ IyorE!t::',
;vc;ul t�OCi,'°
n ; It,OO f?f _' -`_:; and [ 1' "f) E t. _-
3
seq., to the extent pertinent to I �,e ?LANNING AREA.
WASTE GENERATION STUDY shall mean i comprehensive study or studies
that describe and analyze SOLID WASTES generated, diverted, and
disposed of in and by the jurisdiut.i.o�is c.f each of the parties
hereto, conducted pursuant to Cal-ifornia Code of Regulations, Title
14, Chapter 9, Sections 18722 et:._`,.fg.
ARTLCLE 2
COORDINATED PLANNING ACTIVITY
The purpose of this MOU is provide for coordinated PLANNING
between the parties so that each party may prepare SOURCE REDUCTION
AND RECYCLING ELEMENTS that will.. farm the basis for INTEGRATED WASTE
MANAGEMENT in the PLANNING AREA. i 'he purpose of the MOU is not to
implement, coordinate, manage, or :operate any specific INTEGRATED
WASTE MANAGEMENT program. However, the parties are obligated to in
good faith, meet and discuss the: >c' issues and develop coordinated
plans. Specific PLANNING ACTIVI`T "�'S ;hall include, without
:Limitation:
a. Conduct a WASTE GENERAT ON STUDY for the PLANNING AREA
which, without limitat7,�n, addresses SOLID WASTES
currently generated by ach jurisdiction of each party,
and diverted from or disposed of at permitted solid waste
facilities by each j cir s .d ic:t iori of each party.
b. Conduct a comprehensive and coordinated analysis of SOLID
WASTE diversion alterrnza ives, including without limitation
SOURCE REDUCTION, RE,--Y( ING, and COMPOSTING for the
PLANNING AREA.
C. Develop coordinated S'OIJD WASTE diversion strategies for
the PLANNING AREA for incorporation into the SOURCE
REDUCTION AND RECYCLING' ELEMENTS, including regional
programs and PROCESS INC faci.l i ti es.
d. Assess the residual SOLD WASTE DISFJSAL needs for the
PLANNING AREA, pursuant to Pub] -ic Resources Code Sections
41260 and 41460, includinq remaining or planned disposal
capacity for SOLID WASI!S not_ ;,object to SOURCE REDUCTION,
RECYCLING, or COMPOS`II'�
e. Coordinate <_nnd develop oirnt environmental assessments for
completed SOURCE REDUC'T ON and RECYCLING ELEMENTS to
comply with the Cal i`.cr i<i Env :.ronmental Quality Act
(CEQA) .
f. Consider and develop cF ions f(..)r INTEGRATED WASTE
MANAGEMENT programs 1.cr the PL.ANNING AREA both before and
upon completion of SOLI, PEDUC'TION AND RECYCLING
ELEMENTS.
ART . QLE
ADMINISTRA`L'I DN AND FUNDING
Each party to this MOU recognizes its independent
responsibilities and local fee authorities pursuant to Public
Resources Code Sections 40900 et and 41900 et seq. In order to
accomplish the coordinated PLANNIN referred to herein, the parties
further agree as follows:
a. Following execution of this MOU, or in the alternative
before execution of this MOU, the parties shall meet and
determine the proposed budget for implementation of this
MOU, including without limitation, any and all PLANNING
and the WASTE GENERATION STUDY, and shall further agree
upon and prepare a statement of budgeted tasks. A
$500,000 budget and related statement of tasks must be
approved by all parties before any funding is proposed to
and approved by the Board of Supervisors of Ventura
County, as provided in :_: ubparagraph b. below. A copy of
said budget and related statement of tasks shall be
attached to this MOU .:I;, cxhiba.t "B ".
b. The parties shall fund he aforesaid budget through
imposition of a new MANDATED I?E:E by the County of Ventura
on the Simi Valley Landfill, which such fee will be
effective, July 1, 1990 and shall terminate when all
budgeted costs, as esta):.iished in subparagraph a. above, IF have been paid. Each of the parties shall recommend the
amount of said MANDATED FEE to the Board of Supervisors of
Ventura County. Notw:it'.l,standing this MOU, said MANDATED
FEE shall be subject to the approval of the Board of
Supervisors in the exe.ri _se c:>f: its discretion. Said
MANDATED FEE shall be r: :�d ex,c l us ivaly to fund the
aforesaid budget.
C. As collected, MANDATED ;iEE funds shall be deposited in a
separate trust with the :'ounty of Ventura
Auditor- Controller, and ;hall be distributed to each of
the parties, as set foie ,`i in Exhibit "B ". No party shall
receive reimbursement I(A' performance of its tasks in
excess of the amounts budgeted for such tasks unless all
parties unanimously agr, ,, thcr -, t.
d. In order to provide f'oi the timely completion of the WASTE
GENERATION STUDY and SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING
ELEMENTS, initial effori for such studies shall be funded
collectively through id,, 9nc�� contributions by each of the
parties in proportion tC thN� population living within each
party's jurisdiction -,Ii, 'ho PL., \NNING AREA. The parties
agree that the proport:. ! c is i:.o(i i_or this purpose and the
subsequent reimbursemeii, of contributions shall be
as set forth in Exhibit P"
e. To ensure the recovery )f costs incurred herein through
the MANDATED FEE, the p,irties shall undertake efforts to
maintain their historic percentage of waste disposal at
the Simi Valley Landfil from their respective
jurisdictions.
f. The parties shall designate staff representatives to meet
on a regular basis to � compli-3h the tasks and objectives
covered by this MOU.
g. The parties agree, by unanimous vote, that staff support
for this MOU and /or preparation of each party's SOURCE
REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEMENT beyond that specified in
Exhibit "B" shall be the financial responsibility of each
party and that each party shall absorb its own costs
related thereto without reimbursement hereunder.
h. All decisions by the patties herein regarding
administration or implementatic:in of this MOU must be made
by unanimous vote of th panties, with each party
receiving one vote. If the parties cannot agree on a
course of action, no action may be taken pursuant to this
MOU, and no costs pertinent to such actions shall be
reimbursed pursuant t c:) iI S MGt'..
ARTICLE 4
ADOPTION OF PROi:RAMS AND ELEMENTS
Notwithstanding this MOU, ea,.n party retains, and in no way
relinquishes, its power or responsibility to determine and adopt its
own SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEMENT" and any specific SOURCE
REDUCTION, RECYCLING, COMPOSTING of SOLED WASTE DISPOSAL, programs or
projects. Without waiving or limiaing in any way such powers or
responsibilities, the parties herelr) agree to cooperate in the
PLANNING activities referred to herein in order to help achieve an
INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT prog:rarr f'or, the PLANNING AREA and to that
end they shall coordinate formulat )r of proposals for SOURCE
REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEMENTS.. r the event the parties are
unable to agree, by unanimous vote on whit those proposals should
be, then no such proposals will. ])d lade b., the parties pursuant to
this MOU.
ART "LE
AMENDMENTS. TER!4 AND TERMINATION
This MOU shall be effective ( r the date of execution hereof by
all of the Cities of Moorpark, S;i.m. Valley, Thousand Oaks and the
County of Ventura, and shall autom,�,ical.].� terminate on July 1, 1991,
6
unless the parties, by unanimous tote, agree to terminate this MOU
earlier or extend this MOU to a different date. This MOU may also be
amended by unanimous vote of the parties. Any party may withdraw
from this MOU by giving each of th,.N other parties sixty (60) days
written notice. In the event a party withdraws and at the time
withdrawal becomes effective, the .,ithdrawing party has not completed
tasks allocated to it in Exhibit: '`" , it shall not be entitled to
reimbursement for those tasks purs�iant to Article 3 above. In the
event that the collected MANDATED FEES exceed the expended costs
pursuant to Exhibit "B" at the termination of this MOU, said fees
shall be distributed to the parties in accordance with Exhibit "C"
for the implementation of SOURCE R]�?DUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEMENTS.
A.RI CL1.' 6
STATUTORY AU`T_'HO,k;IZ'i'_._AND LIABILITY
Each party to this MOU recogiizes its independent
responsibility and potential liabi it }' under Public Resources Code
Sections 41000, 41300, 41810 et se j. and 41850 et sea., regarding
SOURCE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING ELEMENT submittal, deficiencies and
enforcement. The parties agree th,,t this MOU in no way restricts or
limits that responsibility, liabil ty or : >tatutory authority and
further that this MOU in no way eo:stitz.:tos any form of
indemnification by any party of ar7 c :rther party hereto with respect
to such responsibilities, liabiai� �s;, ind statutory authorities or
in any other respect..
i
NO. ICES
All notices given pursuant t this MOU shall be made by
depositing the same in the U.S. m,:1', postage prepaid, and addressed
as follows, or to such other adds- as the party may designate
hereafter:
TO CITY OF MOORPARK:
TO CITY OF SIMI VALLEY:
TO CITY OF THOUSAND OAKS:
City of Moorpark
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Attn: City Manager
City .f Simi Vailey
2 9 Z 9 `I"apo Canyon Road
Simi Valley, CA 93063
'.ity Manager
,CL :.y of Thousand Oaks
E?. ). Box 1496
Fniousland Oaks, CA 91360
A� .r : (;'i_ty Manager
TO COUNTY OF VENTURA:
All correspondence shall be
postmark.
County of Ventura
800 South Victoria Avenue
Ventura, CA 93009
Attn: Chief Administrative
Officer
Teemed le.livered three days after
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties he,:eto have first executed this
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING by autllori-zed officials thereof on the
date indicated below.
Date
CITY OF MOORPARK
Bi--- . -.
Date CITY OF SIMI VALLEY
F3}
Date Cl TY ( )F THOUSAND OAKS
Date CCUNT�' OF VENTURA
4 By
�. 0
VENTURA
RIVER
VALLEY
...... ........
c�
i
.......... � ...................
Al \
FILLMORE \
PIRU
SANTA PAULA
•�,•a•••
. •
VENTURA •�� f•
iMOORPARK
SIMI VALLEY
LAS POSAS
• �,)*.Y �.w.. t �}��� r � Dili 'fs ��yt °.tip �� .a WL"� }�� {'
OXNARD
PORT 1
HUENEME
AREA OF INTEREST BOUNDARY
claw
•, CAMARILLO
i
SPHERE OF INFLUENCE BOUNDARY
t5rtdti;� CITY LIMITS
r
•
C. N Y 0
OAK PARK I
EXHIBIT "A"
EXH LBIT B
Part I: East Countv SRRE SOW
SRREs shall be prepared in accordance with the final regulations
adopted by the California Integrated Waste Management Board pursuait
to Section 40502 of the Public Fles :urges --ode.
TASK 1.0: PREPARE JURISDICTIONAL 3ETTI_NG_DOCUMENTS
Prepare "Setting" sections for eaci) Source Reduction and Recycling
Element (SRRE), including: a description of the jurisdiction
(history of formation /incorporation, political boundaries, principal
areas, sections or neighborhoods; lemographics, land use, economy and
economic development, transportati�._)n networks, local resources,
hazards); the history of solid wast.:e management in the jurisdiction;
and current waste handling and d.is}_)osal practices. This task
includes reviewing local planning documents and ordinances, reviewing
data on existing programs, coordin,rting with jurisdiction officials
and preparing text and graphics fc review by respective parties.
TASK 2.0: COMPILE AND INPUT EX;CS_T ! NG _WASTE_ GENERATION STUDY DATA
Compile data inputs by jurisdicticr: for WASTEPLAN software program,
including characterizing waste cfenR.rat: ion rates by sector, refuse and
curbside recycling collection syst-ms, compiling current diversion
data, and characterizing existing 3 facilities.
TASK 3.0: ADMINISTER QUANTITATIVE FIELD ANALYSIS (DISPOSAL)
Retain a qualified consultant and provide for administration of the
consultant contract to perform a Wiste Di.;posal Characterization
quantitative field analysis pursuant to the California Code of
Regulations and the attached Scope of Work: (Attachment 1). This task
includes selecting and retaining a qual. f.)ed consultant to perform
the designated work tasks within tle cost parameters specified in
Part II of Exhibit B, administerin tLe consultant contract and
approving the disbursement of funil
TASK 4.0: CONDUCT WASTE DIVERSION �-HARACTERIZATION
Prepare a comprehensive diversion `_udy for each jurisdiction which
identifies all source reduction, n, cycling and composting programs
which divert targeted materials in t-he wastestream (as identified in
Attachment 2). This study shall q! anti.fy for each of these waste
types the volume and weight divert _f, the source and destination of
diverted materialn, and shall dev�_)p 3 diversion allocation
methodology for a:;signing divers.i:J credits to each jurisdiction.
This task shall include surveying )urce reduction activities,
administering a consultant study major recycling services in the
PLANNING AREA to secure proprietary information regarding the origin,
quantity, and destination of recy +: d nata- rials, conducting local
recycling activity surveys, anal; g ?.iv�rsion data and calculating
the waste diversion projections r' ,_t srisdiction.
TASK 5.0: PREPARE SOLID WASTE__C,E.NEEATION ANALYSIS
Prepare a written solid waste generation analysis for each
jurisdiction, based upon the findo_nq <s of Tasks 2, 3 and 4 (Waste
Generation Study), for inclusi +.-n n the :;RRE. This analysis shall
include, at a minimum:
(1) A list by specific waste categories, of the quantities of
materials currently diverted from disposal, and the
materials identified as jeinq currently disposed according
to the Waste Generation turfy
(2) A list of waste material : currently disposed in the
jurisdiction which could potentially be diverted from
disposal by use of diver ° ;ior programs.
(3) A list of the waste materials currently disposed in the
jurisdiction which cannot be diverted from disposal by
diversion programs, and discuf�sion of why these waste
materials cannot be d ..ve ted from disposal.
TASK 6.0 PREPARE SOURCE REDUCTIO', COMPONENT
Conduct analyses and prepare writ en report on source reduction
within the jurisdiction including but not limited to: short -and
medium -term objectives; targeted aste categories and types;
description of existing activit.k : eval...ation of specific source
reduction alternatives; program s iectio ; program implementation;
and monitoring and evaluation met ,ds.
TASK 7.0 PREPARE RECYCLING COMJPo, E;N`T
Conduct analyses and prepare writ:,c>n report on current and proposed
recycling activities, programs, i:I facilities with which the
jurisdiction shall meet mandated ' version goals. This shall
include, at a minimum, identific,c :-on of recycling objectives;
identification of targeted waste categories and types; a description
of existing current recycling act ,,ities;� evaluation of recycling
alternatives; selection of a rec,0 inl program; description of the
implementation program; and a de!: i,P ~i.on of the methods to be used
for monitoring and evaluation.
TASK 8.0 PREPARE COMPOSTING COh1}'t : E`v'C
Conduct analyses and prepare a r(,1,=rt on existing and proposed
composting programs for each jurls iction which contribute to the
accomplishment of mandated diver..; ,n (Joals. At a minimum, the
component shall discuss the fol.lc -k.ng composting objectives and
marketing strategies; types and yi.int:._tie.s of materials to be
composted; description of exist. irnc: r_,)mposting programs; evaluation of
composting alternatives; composter }pra( r "am selection; program
:implementation; cind proposed mo -, i v r, 11:1 4 1c evaluation programs.
TASK 9.0 PREPARE SPECIAL WASTE CUMPONEN`I
Conduct analyses and prepare a report on existing and proposed
programs for sewage sludge, asbestos, and other special wastes
identified in the Waste Generatior� Study.. The special waste
component objectives shall include a plan for reducing the hazard
potential of identified special wastes generated by the jurisdiction.
The component shall discuss existing conditions; an evaluation of
alternatives; selection of special. waste program; program
implementation; and program monitor -inl and evaluation.
TASK 10.0 PREPARE HOUSEHOLD HAZAR,C)OUS WASTE COMPONENT
Conduct analyses and prepare a rep :rt on existing and proposed
programs for reduction or eliminat:i.on of the disposal of household
hazardous waste (HHW) at solid waste disposal facilities.
Description of existing programs sizal:L explain current methods for
source reduction, recycling, colle,,- -tion, treatment, and disposal of
HHW in the jurisdiction, and shall identify the types and quantities
of these materials so handled. Pii)gram alternatives for HHW shall
:include collection; monitoring; re+::yc.ling; and public education.
Selected programs shall identify the types and quantities of HHW
anticipated to be collected, re,:---ycied, an,J /or disposed; recycling and
reuse efforts; proposed education 1rocjrams; and the level of
multijurisdictional efforts. The omponent shall also include a
discussion of implementation, mcni or nq, and evaluation.
TASK 11: PREPARE .EDUCA,riON AND .T?'G'E .I(` I_NY )RMATION COMPONENT
Conduct appropriate assessments an,i prepare a report which describes
how the jurisdiction will educate xnd inform its citizens about
source reduction, recycling and compostinca programs, and the safe
handling and disposal of solid was,re. Th£-! component shall describe
program objectives; existing prog.rims, evaluation of alternatives;
program selection; program implomc
evaluation. .ti +r program monitoring; and
TASK 12: PREPARE DISPOSAL FACILITI CAPAC;LTY COMPONENT
Conduct analyses and prepare a rep.rt: which characterizes existing
permitted disposal /transformation acili.t...es, and describes those to
be phased out in the short- and me :ium -germ planning periods. The
component shall present a disposal _a�acity needs projection for the
jurisdiction for each year of a f'i '.Ccri ( G:) year period, commencing
in 1991.
TASK 13: PREPARE FUNDING COMPONErl
Conduct analyses, consult with jur, : ;dict.icn officials, and present
documentation which demonstrates a�jequa.te funding sources for program
planning, development, and impleme--ation. The component shall
provide cost estimates for propc:.;(? prc,gr:,ms in the short -term
planning period, and identify bc1:- ",. -everu sources and contingency
funding.
3
TASK 14: PREPARE INTEGRATION COMPONENT
Prepare a report which describes i,::,w the Source Reduction, Recycling,
Composting, Special Waste, and Household Hazardous Waste Components
combine to achieve the 25% and 50 °: diversion mandates for the
jurisdiction. This component shalt describe how the SRRE complies
with the waste management hierarch /, how the various Components will
be integrated, and how the program priorities were determined. The
component shall also contain an integrated schedule for the
implementation of tasks and the ara-.ic_Lpated date of diversion goal
attainment.
TASK 15: PREPARE SRRE ADMINISTRATIVE AND „PRELIMINARY DRAFTS
The ten mandated Components shall ue combined with a Setting and
Introduction section, and integrated into a cohesive SRRE for each
jurisdiction. SRRE Administrative Drafts shall be prepared and
submitted to jurisdiction official. for review and comment.
Revisions shall be incorporated ir'o an S.RPE Preliminary Draft for
each jurisdiction.
TASK 16: PREPARE CEOA DOCUMENTATI•:11
Prepare Initial Study for the Preliminary Draft SRRE. Prepare
appropriate environmental document includ :i.nq, as necessary,
preparation and issuance of a Noti o of Preparation. Submit draft
environmental document to jurisdict for an(] circulate to appropriate
agencies for review and comment.
TASK 17: CIRCULATE PRELIMINARY _DHAFT_SRRI: FOR REVIEW
Circulate the Preliminary Draft for review to adjoining cities,
the County of Ventura, and the VCW
on SRRE to VCWC. Make staff presentation
TASK 18: PREPARE FINAL DRAFT SRRE AND__CEQA DOCUMENT
Respond to comments on the SRRE an, envir : %nmental document and
prepare final drafts for submitta ' -c t}ze jurisdicti..on.
1a, 4
L
OA
General Guidelines for Sampling When Performing a
Quantitative Fidd Analysis for a Solid Waste Generation
Study (CIWMB - February 1990)-
Sampling Solid Waste Generation, Diversion and Disposal - Perform these tasks in the following
order_
a. Identify the Populations.
--cIn each jurisdiction, identify_ the populations of (1) residential units, commercial units,,
industrial sites,, and other sites of solid waste generation; (2) facilities and programs which
recycle, compost. or source reduce solid wastes; and (3) solid waste transfer stations, and
permitted solid waste transformation facilities acid solid waste disposal sites-
For the purposes of these Guidelines, a population is the aggregate from which a sample is
chosen, and refers to the aggregate number of solid waste generators, solid waste diversion
facilities and programs, or solid waste transfer. rransformarion and disposal facilities identified
by the jurisdiction_
b. Stratify the Populations.
Stratify each identified population into distinct — ibpopulations, as determined by the
jurisdiction. For example, to stratify the population for a solid waste diversion characterization,
the jurisdiction could stratify the population of recycling facilities into the following
subpopulations: drop-off centers, buy -back centers. and thrift shops. If the number of units in
the subpopulation is small, the jurisdiction may hoosc not to stratify the population_
c Random Sampling.
Assign a unique number to each identified unit d a subpopulation_ Using a random numbers
table, choose the units to be sampled in the sul opularion, during each season identified by
the jurisdiction.
Sampling and Variability Determination - Perfor these tasks in the following order.
a. Sample-
Sample, according to the requirements of sections 18724 and 18726 of this Article, all of the
solid waste generated, all of the solid waste diverted from disposal by recycling, composting or
source reduction, and all of the solid waste disposed, for each identified subpopulation_
To determine the number of samples required f( a statistically representative sampling from
each subpopulatinn, the jurisdiction shall use the formula for normal approximation which is
found in: AJ. Klee and D. Carruth, 'Sample Weeghts in Solid Waste Composition Studies;
American Society of Civil Engineers Journal of i' Sanitary Engineering Division, volume
96(SA4), pages 945 -954, August 1970, which ; , xomorated by reference_ A 90% confidence
interval shall be used in this formula.
Attactur,crr r
b. Sort and Identify.
Sort and identify the solid wastes from each subpopulation, using the sources of waste
generation listed in section 18772(1) of this Article, and the waste categories and waste types
listed in section 18712n1 of this Amide, in 1(:c:)r -ance with the requirements of sections
18772(a) and (b) of this Article_
3.. Assignment of Waste Category and Waste Type
Assign each identified solid waste material to one° of the waste categories and waste types
listed in sections 18=(i) and Q of this Article
4. Volume or Weight Measurement_
Take a volume or weight measure-me--it of each solid waste material that has been identified.
S. Tabulate and Analyze Data - Perform these tasks to the following order.
Tabulate and analyze all data compiled about the waste categories and waste types. As a part
of the analysis, the jurisdiction shall compute 0 .ind (b) as follows:
a. Determination of Mean and Variability.
Compute the sample mean (11) for volume or weight for each waste category and waste
type identified Next, compute the standard deviation of the mean (s; also known as
the standard error), for volume or weigh, ineasurements_
b. Set Confidence Limits- '
Set a 90% confidence limit around the ri- in, for ea,h waste category and waste type
identified-
6- Data Analysis Adjustment_
The data analysis conducted in steps 1 through may be adjusted to include waste categories
and waste types which-
(a) are known, by current written records held by the solid waste recycling, composting, source
reduction, transformation and disposal facilities, to be dis used or diverted in the jurisdiction and
(b) may otherwise be overlooked in the random � i mpl ng procedure_
NOTE: Authority cited: ,Sections 40502 and 41824, Public Resources Code.
Reference: Sections 41030, 41300,41330, 41780 and 4 1 " 11, Public Resources Code.
►• r• �• v rye•: �a.
(1) Paper Category
corrugated containers
mixed paper
newspaper
high grade ledger paper
(2) Plastics Category
high density polyethylene
(EDPE) containers
polyethylene trepthalate
(PET) containers
film plastics
(3) Glass Category
recyclable glassl
(4) Metals Category
aluminum cans
ferrous metals and tin cans
non - ferrous including aluminum scr,)
white goods
(5) Yazd Waste Category
yard waste
(6) Other Orqanics Catggory
organic compostables'-�
tires and rubber
wo•• wastes
(7) Other Waste category
inert solids
household hazardous
waste
(8) dial Waste Category
sewage sludge
1 includes refillable glass bever -cle containers, California redemption
2 glass, and other recyclable glass
includes food waste, agricultural -op resi -clues and manure
Attactm-v nt
B-
EXIEEBI'r B
(c or . )
A budget of $500,000 has been estim;t,ed for purposes of this MOLT. Costs
which total $500,000 are distributed ;: fo!_i:fr:
Waste Generation Studer
(Disposal Characterization) $ 50,000
Jurisdiction Staff Support
City of Moorpark $50,000
City of Simi Valley $50,000
City of Thousand Oaks $50,000
County of Ventura $50,000
$200,000
SRRE Preparation (County of Venturi, $250,00
$500,000
The parties agree that the County of Ventura Solid Waste Management
Department will administer preparat 1 )n of the Waste Generation Study and
the SRRE for each jurisdiction.
Part III: New Mandated Fee Calculaticx I and Rat, 2
The new MANDATED FEE shall be set at. 1.45 per ton for wastes received at
the Simi Valley Landfill to ro --over anticipated budget costs of
approximately $500,000. This caloilation assumes an approximate annual
tonnage at the Simi Valley Lancif:,. for the period July 1, 1990 to
June 30, 1991 of 350,000 tons.
Part IV: Reimbursable Advance Payme_rrt-s and_Digtrib Lion of Mandated Fees
Reimbursable Advance Payments
Pursuant to Article 3, Sections(,-. <i,,d d. of this MOU, the jurisdictions
shall make reimbursable advance payments to the MANDATED FEE trust
established by the County of VE:nta 71 Audif'or- Controller in the total
amount of $100,000 as follows:
City of Moorpark $101,000
City of Simi Valley $40 „000
City of Thousand Oaks $40„000
County of Ventura $10,, 000
� 1O0 , 000
B- -f..
Distribution of Mandated Fees
1) Quarterly Payments to the County of Ventura - A record of expenses
incurred for the preparation of SRREs pursuant to this MOU shall be
kept by the Solid Waste Management Department and trannitted to the
Auditor- C:ontrollor for reimburemnt on a quarterly basis during the
term of this agreement. Such payments shall not exceed a total of
$200,000 unless and until the disposition of remaining funds in excess
of this amount is unanimously am- e:. upon by the parties.
2) Semi - Annual Payments to the Part:.ies - Flach party to this MOU shall
receive two equal payments of $25,000 on January 1, 1991 and
July 1, 1991 in support of sty i ff sen, ices for coordination and
administration of this MOU.
3) Annual Payment to the Parties Parties to this agreement shall
receive on July 1, 1991 payment in full of their respective
reimbursable advance as follows:.
City of Moorpark $10,000
City Simi Valley $40,000
City of Thousand Oaks $40,000
County of Ventura f310,000
4) Procedure in Event of Insufficient Funds - If there are insufficient
MANDATED FEE funds collected to pay all parties in full pursuant to
the schedule of payments set fortt. in 1), 2), and 3) above, available
funds shall be allocated betweer the parties in proportion to the
amounts then owing to each party. Balances then due each party shall
be disbursed as they became avai.lac_Le on a proportional basis. If, on
July 1, 1991, insufficient funds ,ire available for payment in full to
all parties, the MANDATED FEE shat.].. continue to be collected pursuant
to Article 3 (b) of this MOU an., allocated proportionately as funds
become available and until all W)U 74 bt--�s Ihave been retired.
t3 -1)
h rn r� • •. • 9►,�►w�. i •
Pursuant to .Article 5 of this MQU, in the event that collected
NOD FEES exceed the expended casts pursuant to Exhibit "B"
at the termination of this MCC, said fees <-iall be distributed
a=xtling to the following percentage fo=zuila:
City of Moorpark 10%
City of Simi Valley 40%
City of Thousand Oaks 40%
Unirm porated Area 10%
SAL PIANW= AREA: 100%
MOORPARK EXHIBIT$
PAUL W. LAWRASON, Jr.
pn
a
Mayor
O
9
SCOTT MONTGOMERY
Mayor Pro Tern
ELOISE BROWN
`-
Councilmember
'
CLINT HARPER, Ph. D.
'o
{
Councilmember
BERNARDO M. PEREZ
Councilmember
May
'_'.' "0
LILLIAN KELLERMAN
City Clerk
The Honorable Board
of Sup(--r%
sors
County of Ventura
800 South Victoria
Avenue
Ventura, CA 93009
Dear Chair Schaefer and Membe s of the Board:
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J.KANE
City Attorney
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Director of
Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief c' Police
RICHARD T. HARE
City Treasurer
The City Council of the City (.A" has taken action to
approve the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between
Moorpark, Simi Valley, Thousand Oaks, and the County of
Ventura for solid waste planning efforts. In furtherance of
this MOU the Council has alsc hprovecll the following actions.
1. The approval of a $'. (;00 r�?imbursable advance to
begin the 14OU proce:;s
2. The designation of ' :_1 County of Ventura as the
preparer of Moorpark's ;ource Reduction and Recycling
Elements through the '- U
3. A request to your f1cird to proceed with a Waste
Generation Study "cr tY,e ":ast County Wasteshed
pursuant to the MOU i
4. A request to your Boai ii to implement a new Mandated
Fee at the Simi Vaij 1�andf_ill in the amount of
$1.45 /ton, effective 1i� 1, 1990, to finance the
tasks required by t.aie of California and
enumerated in the MOT.
We greatly appreciate the
undertaken in these tasks .
expeditious approval of the M
Very truly yours,
Paul Lawrason
Mayor
BP:sc:545.per
cooperative_ efforts being
and look forward to your
1 E!ir,i , ur requests herein.
- -- -- — - - - --
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark ",ahfornia 93021 (805) 529 -6864