HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1990 0905 CC REG ITEM 11FBERNARDO M.PEREZ
Mayor
SCOTT MONTGOMERY
Mayor Pro Tern
ELOISE BROWN
Councilmember
CLINT HARPER, Ph.D.
Councilmember
PAUL W. LAWRASON, Jr.
Councilmember
LILLIAN KELLERMAN
City Clerk
MOORPARK
MEMORANDUM
M
�'r n A
I 1 - ILK
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
"OORPARK, CALIFORNIA CHERYL J. KANE
Clly Co ncll Meefl City Attorney
of PATRICK RICHARDS, A, I.C.P.
�9W Director of
ACTION: Community Development
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
City Engineer
/ 9 HN V. GILLESPIE
Uy Chief of Police
RICHARD T. HARE
City Treasurer
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Patrick Richards, Director of Community Development
DATE: August 27, 1990 (CC meeting of September 6, 1990)
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO SCOPE OF WORK AND CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY
OF MOORPARK AND PBR FOR THE CARLSBERG SPECIFIC PLAN AND
SPECIFIC PLAN EIR
Background
On August 15, 1990, the City Council made revisions to the
Carlsberg Specific Plan. These revisions will require substantial
additional work on the part of the consultant (PBR) to make the
appropriate revisions to both the Specific Plan Text as well as the
accompanying Environmental Impact Report.
Discussion
On August 27, 1990, the Community Development Department received
a letter from PBR indicating the revisions necessary in order to
accommodate the changes to the Plan made by the Council. Attached
as Exhibits A and B are annotated tables of contents and lists of
Exhibits. Those items that have been marked with an asterisk will
need revisions. In addition those items that are marked, the
consultant will need additional information from both the traffic
and biological consultants. The cost of these revisions is
estimated to be between $44,000 and $44,500. In addition, the
consultant will provide preliminary staff reports and attend a
maximum of two public hearings for an estimated cost of $8,500.
Document printing and materials will be billed on a time and
materials basis and will be in addition to the above stated cost
estimates.
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021
(805) 529 -6864
The aforementioned additional costs are broken down as follows:
Organization Tasks Amount
PBR Environmental Impact
Report Revisions $17,000
PBR Specific Plan Revisions $21,500
Austin -Foust Assoc. Traffic Revisions $ 5,000
Richard Burgess Biology Revisions $ 500 - $1,000
Public Hearings and
Preliminary Staff Reports
(2 each maximum) $ 8,520
Document printing and materials wi:11 be an additional expense and
will be billed on a time and materials basis. These costs are
estimated as follows:
Specific Plan (40 copies) $1,400
EIR Addendum (25 copies) S 625
Sub Total $2,025
Total $54,545 - $55,045
Recommendation
Authorize modification of the existing contracts with the City, PBR
and the applicant.
Attachments: Attachment A and B Annotated Table of Contents
Attachment C - Revised Traffic Scope of Work
PA
Title
I.
* 11.
CARLSBERG SPECIFIC PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
?ace Number
UTIVE SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
1
A. Purpose and Intent
I
B. Location
1
C. Planning Objectives
I
D. Existing Conditions
2
I. Existing Land Use
2
2. Existing Circulation
2
3. Topography
3
4. Hydrology
3
S. Geology and Soils
3
6. Biological Resources
4
7. Cultural Resources
4
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A. Land Use Concept
5
B. Residential
S
1. Introduction
5
2. SFD - I acre
6
t 3. SFD - .9869. ZOO 000
+;
6
pro - Roca
0'. SFD - ft 000
6
••
6
III,
C. Commercial Uses
I. Introduction
l 2. Business Park
I
3, Subregional Retail/ Commercial
i
4. Neighborhood Retail /Commercial
D. Dedicated City Use
E. Open Space /Recreation
F. Circulation Plan
1. Regional Access
�f 2. Local Access
3. Internal Access
G. Grading Plan
i' 1• Conceptual Plan
2. Grading Criteria
K. Utilities and Services Plans
I. Introduction
2• Drainage Facilities
3• Water Facilities
4• Wastewater Facilities
5• Other Utilities
I• Phasing Plan
COMMUNITY DESIGN PLAIN
A. Introduction
B. Landscape Architecture Design Guidelines
C. Architecture Design Guidelines
i
v� v . .• v v L I V I M
7
7
7
7
7
7
8
8
8
8
9
9
9
9
10
10
10
11
li
11
12
13
13
13
27
IV. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
A. Purpose and Intent
B. General Provisions
C. General Standards
D. SFD - 1 Acre
E. S�FD�- O9666 ?,p, 000
r�. gP -4yoo $,000
o
Multi- Fainily
J. SRC Sub Regional Retail /Commercial
�• K. Neighborhood Retail /Commercial
Business Park
Park
Open Space
IMPLEMENTATION
A. General Provisions
B. Review Procedures
C. Specific Plan Amendments
CONFORMANCE WIM THE GENERAL PLAN
V.
V1.
a
49
49
49
50
53
56
58
60
63
66
68
71
73
74
74
75
76
77
CARLSBERG SPECIFIC PLAN
i 1i
Following
22ge Number
1
1
3
3
3
4
5
8
8
9
9
10
11
11
12
13
14
14
14
14
14
EXHIBIT LIST
i it Numbe r
1.
Regional Locatiori
2.
Vicinity Map
3.
Topography & Key EIevations
4,
Slope Analysis
S•
Geology & Soils
6.
Biological Resources
7.
�'j( Lazed Use Plan
S.
Open Space & Recreation Plan
9.
J( Circulation Plan,
10.
Grading Plan;
11.t
Cut and Fill flan
12,
�t Drainage Facilities
13.
* Water Facilities
14,
Wastewater Facilities
1S,
'bC Phasing Plan
16,
Conceptual Landscape Plan
17.
4k City Gateway Elevation
18,
�k City Gateway flan View
19.
4t Gateway Section
20.
4 Primary Entr}
21.
-�t Primary Entry
i 1i
Following
22ge Number
1
1
3
3
3
4
5
8
8
9
9
10
11
11
12
13
14
14
14
14
14
22•
Primary Entry Light Column
23.
Secondary Fntry
24•
Neighborhood Entry
25•
i
-
Cross Section Key Map
26.
Street Sections:
a•
Moorpark Freeway Buffer
b•
Tierra Rejada Buffer
27•
Street Sections:
C.
Spring Road
d•
New Los Angeles Avenue
28
�(
Street Sections:
e•
Science Drive
f.
Peach Hill Extension
29•
+
Street Sections:
g•
h•
Neighborhood Street (through street)
Neighborhood Street (cul -de -sac)
30.
44
Street Sections:
r•
Community Park
J•
Fuel Modification
31,
Oak Tree Guidelines
V
14
14
14
19
20
21
21
21
22
25
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CARLSBERG SPECIFIC PLAN EIR
on No. liag PaQe_o,
N
1.0 TiNTRODU-- —TIQN-An S131 may 1
1.1 IN'IRODUMON 1
1.2 'it AREAS OF CONTROVERSY 2
1.3 ,( SUMMARY OF IMPACTS 3
2.0
PROTECT DESCRIPTION
2.1
LOCATION AND SETTING
13
13
2.2
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
2.3
PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
13
2.4
INTENDED USES OF THIS EIR
14
16
2.5
RELEVANT PLANS
19
10
EXISTING ENI TTRONIIENTAL CONDITIONS
L�IPACT,4 AND 4iiTiCaTrnrr �� A CTTT1Tn
23
3.1
LAND USE
3.2
-it
HYDROLOGY
23
3.3
*
GEOLOGY /SOILS
27
3.4
4t
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
30
3.5
CULTURAL RESOURCES
38
3.6
'(
TRANSPORTATION /CIRCULATION
3.7
�C
AIR QUALIT)'
50
50
3.8
''
ACOUSTICS
61
3.4(
LANDFORM MODIFICATION /AESTHETICS
78
84
3.10
SOCIOECONOMICS
3.11
it
PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILI'T'IES
88
95
3.12
'(
OPEN SPACE / PARKS
112
TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd)
4.0 e N'
UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMpArTC 117
5.0 *INSIGNIFICANT IMPACTS
120
6.0 S TOT [ PROPO ED PROTFCT
125
7.0 THE •
• rW •
• 'U
• / : • ►h/ 1 ►Y : ►� 1
THE
LON-G-TER PgonljrTWITV Y
1
.. / E ANT) TRRPTurvx
Com,mLinIFINTS • !..
►11 • Y •
• • ) 1 Y
H 1 ►Y Y /
9•0 GR0`VTT4- TIVDUCINf"- AN rULULATIVF
_INIP OTS OF THE PRnPn�Fn �'ROTECT
133
10.0 ORGANIZATT AND so NST TED 141
11.0 BIBLIO =RAPHY
143
No
TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd)
Im-
12,0 Al
A.
B.
. C.
D.
E.
'PENTDIC .s
Initial Study /Notice of preparation
Traffic Study
Biological Study
Correspondence
Other Data
Pa,.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
!7
8
9
0
1
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Regional Location
Site Vicinity
Surrounding Land Use
:1 Land Use Plan
Drainage Facilities
Soil Boring Locations
Geology and Soils
ff- Biological Resources
Existing Circulation System
1996 Background ADT Volumes
Project Trip Distribution
General Plan amendments
Air Quality Modeling Locations
Noise Modelling Locations
Site Photo Index
Site Photos
Site Photos
Conceptual Landscape Plan
Grading Concept
Alternative 1
" Alternative 2
iv
Follows
aeN
2
2
23
24
27
30
30
38
50
50
58
60
75
79
84
84
84
86
86
126
128
LIST OF TABLES
ON
11
12
13
14
15
16
Average County Summer Day Weekday
Emissions -1983
-; Project - Generated 'Total Emissions
" Maximum One -Hour Carbon Monoxide
Concentrations (PPM) with Ambient
Concentrations
CNEL Considered Acceptable For Various
Land Use Categories
Roadway Noise Contours
Simi - Thousand Oaks Subregional Area
Jobs /Housing Balance Analysis -
Simi- Thousand Oaks Subregion
V
Page loo.
15
28
51
53
53
55
57
58
63
65
74
75
79
Mf U1
1
it
Statistical Summary
2
Cumulative 50 -Year Runoff CFS
to the Arroyo Simi Channel
3
1990 Existing and 1996 Background
ICU Summary
4
Project Land Use and Trip Generation
Summary
5
Trip Rate Summary
6
1996 Project ICU Summary
7
Recommended Intersection Improvements
8E
1996 Project ICU Summary with
Intersection Improvements
9
Ambient Air Quality Standards
ON
11
12
13
14
15
16
Average County Summer Day Weekday
Emissions -1983
-; Project - Generated 'Total Emissions
" Maximum One -Hour Carbon Monoxide
Concentrations (PPM) with Ambient
Concentrations
CNEL Considered Acceptable For Various
Land Use Categories
Roadway Noise Contours
Simi - Thousand Oaks Subregional Area
Jobs /Housing Balance Analysis -
Simi- Thousand Oaks Subregion
V
Page loo.
15
28
51
53
53
55
57
58
63
65
74
75
79
City of Moorpark Share of Regional 94
Housing Need
4 Project Alternatives 127
Proposed General Plan Amendments 137
Vi
Ma Joanne Sullivan
Au ust 20, 1990
Pa2b 2
We shall begin immediately upon notice to proceed with a draft report completed within
weeks.
Thank you for the opportunity to propose on this important planning effort. Please contact
m if or Kendall Elmer of our office with any questions regarding this proposal.
Ve tru [v vn, „v
I
W, Austin
REc EW -D Aug 27 0 c�
�t�AMSTIMAOIIST ASSOCIAT,VS, INC,
rRA FIC FNO/NEEq /rya AND rRANSPORrAr1oN PLANNING
2020 ORTH TUSTIN AVENUE • SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 • TELEPHONE (714) 667 -0496
FAX (714) 667 -7952
August 20, 1990
Ms. 4oanne Sullivan
1801F Sky Park Circle
Irvin t, CA 92714
SAL: CARLSBERG SPECIFIC PLAN TRAFFIC STUDY
Joanne:
Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. (AFA) is pleased to propose a scope of services to prepare
a re ' ed traffic study in support of the overall EIR revision being prepared for the Carlsberg
Spe fie Plan proposed development in the City of Moorpark. The primary objective of the
pro sed traffic study revision is to analyze the traffic impacts associated with the latest Carlsberg
land se and circulation plan. The individual tasks comprising our suggested scope of services shall
incl e:
1. Conduct a trip generation, distribution, and intersection impact analysis associated
with the recently revised Carlsberg land use and circulation plan.
2. Identify and evaluate suitable mitigation for any project traffic impact greater than
one percent of the intersection capacity utilization (ICED value at any intersection
where the city's standard level of service is not provided and/or maintained.
3. Prepare a revised traffic study report in a format suitable for incorporation into the
EIR with findings and recommendations for traffic improvements required to fully
mitigate the project's traffic impacts.
The work is proposed to be completed on a time and materials basis for a fee not to exceed
$5, 0 based on ttli' folIc"iiig writ h-d personnel aliocation:
ESTIMATED PERSONNEL ALL,OCAMN
Classification Hours
13= Cost
Principal TraMc Engineer 1i $90
Project Manager SLOW
Amt. Transportation Engineer 26 70 1,400
Senior Technical 45 1,170
Traffic Technician 20 35 700
16 30 480
subtotal $4,830
Direct ckvcnsca: haunt, reproduction, eta
S
TOTAL $S�000
����` 1 �.