Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1990 0919 CC REG ITEM 11C Nd6its � I,TEM MOORPARK BERNARDO M. PEREZ p0" �, STEVEN KUENY Mayor o°>��/moo City Manager SCOTT MONTGOMERY fw+► MOORPARK, aAUFormllA CHERYL J. KANE Mayor Pro Tem qty II Meeting ���� City Attorney ELOISE BROWN �`�41 • �_ye Of 19�RICK Director A.I.C.P. Councilmember o e Director of CLINT HARPER, Ph.D. 'o� "' ACTION. �.Li�Al 4 ommunity Development Councilmember 47, �°` / R. DENNIS DELZEIT PAUL W. LAWRASON,Jc '101 -' j•"- City Engineer Councilmemberetste, , O N V. GILLESPIE LILLIAN KELLERMAN 'Jr Chief of Police City Clerk RICHARD T. HARE City Treasurer MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable City Council FROM: Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community Development ' DATE: September 13, 1990 (CC Meeting of 9-19-90) SUBJECT: PBR SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AND REVISED GENERAL PLAN UPDATE CONTRACTS Background At the City Council 's meeting of May 30, 1990, the Council authorized the Mayor to execute both a Sphere of Influence Study contract and a revised General Plan Update contract with PBR. The agreed upon amount for the Sphere of Influence Study was $38,903 and the agreed upon amount for the revised General Plan Update contract was for $15,750. At that May 30th meeting, the Council also directed that $55,000 be appropriated from the Community Development Fund to pay for the Sphere Study and the additional work for the General Plan Update. Discussion The $15,750 revised General Plan Update contract amount approved by the Council on May 30th was not the correct contract amount. The actual proposal by PBR was for $17,250 which included an additional $1,500 for property ownership research and mapping. Another change to the contract amount is needed to fund additional environmental impact report (EIR) alternative analysis . Staff has discussed the need for additional alternative analysis with the General Plan Update Consultant Selection Committee. PBR provided information to the Committee and staff that based on the existing General Plan Update contract, the Draft EIR will analyze a project which consists of the proposed City land use plan plus the proposed Sphere of Influence study area land use plan. It is staff's opinion that an alternative which should also be studied in the EIR is the proposed City land use plan with no change in land use in the Sphere area. This alternative would allow comparison of the 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529-6864 .P1 The Honorable City Council September 13, 1990 Page 2 environmental impacts associated with development in the City limits in comparison to the combined impacts of the City land use plan and the additional Sphere study area. PBR has identified that analysis of this additional alternative would cost $2,500 . The consensus of the General Plan Update Consultant Selection Committee is that this additional alternative should be studied. At the September 10, 1990 workshop, the Council directed PBR and Austin-Foust to revise the proposed land use plan for the Sphere of Influence study area to result in a reduction of traffic on designated roadways . Today, PBR informed staff that preparation of this revised plan would cost $4,480 (labor and reimbursables) . The revised contract is attached. To accomplish all of the work discussed above, the Council would need to approve a revised General Plan Update Contract for the amount of $24,230 ( $15,750 + $1,500 + $2,500 + $4,480 = $24,230) . Recommendation 1 . Approve and authorize the Mayor to sign the revised General Plan Update contract for the amount of $24,230. 2 . Direct that an additional $6,000 ($1,500 + $4,480 = $5,980) be appropriated from the Community Development Fund to pay for the revised land use plan for the Sphere of Influence study area. 3. Direct that the $2,500 cost for analysis of an additional EIR alternative be paid for out of the funds collected from the General Plan Update applicants. Attachments: Sphere of Influence Study Contract Revised General Plan Update Contract PJR/DST cc: Ken Ryan, PBR — RECEIVED — AGREEMENT FOR PREPARATION OF A J I! L 2 6 1990 SPHERE OF INFLUENCE STUDY City of Moorpark THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this � day of V L. 1990 by and between the City of Moorpark, a municipal corporation located in the County of Ventura, State of California, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and "PHILLIPS BRANDT REDDICR, INC. ", a California Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "PBR". W I T N E S S E T H WHEREAS, the city has the need for the preparation of a Sphere of Influence Study; WHEREAS, City desires to contract for such services with a private consultant in anticipation that said private consultant can provide such services in a manner acceptable to the City; and WHEREAS, PBR is experienced in providing such services for municipal corporations and is able to provide personnel with the proper experience, certifications and background to carry out the duties involved; and WHEREAS, City wishes to retain PBR for the performance of said services; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, benefits and premises herein stated, the parties hereto agree as follows: City does hereby appoint. PBR in a contractual capacity to perform the services in accordance with the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth in Exhibit: "A with the authorities and responsibilities ordinarily granter to this type of consultant work. 1. Compensation to PBR The fees in full compensation to P R for the services rendered shall be as set forth in Exhibit °A ". Agreement for Preparation of: SPHERE OF INFLUENCE STUDY Page 2 II. Termination This agreement may be terminated with or without cause by City at any time with no less than 30 days written notice of such termination. In the event of such termination, PBR shall be compensated for such services up to the date of termination. Such compensation for work in progress shall be pro -rated as to the percentage of progress completed at the date of termination. This agreement may be terminated by PBR only by providing City with written notice no less than 30 days in advance of such termination. III. General Conditions A. City shall not be called upon to assume any liability for the direct payment of` any salary, wage or other compensation to any person employed by PBR performing services hereunder for City. B. PBR is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. Neither the City nor any of its officers, employees, servant or agents shall have control over the conduct of PBR or any of PBR's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth herein. C. At the time of 1) termination of this agreement or 2) conclusion of all work; all original documents, designs, drawings, reports, diskettes, computer files, notes, and other related materials whether prepared by PBR or their subcontractor(s) or obtained in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this agreement shall become the sole property of the City. If required, all text will be forwarded to the City as IBM compatible Word Perfect 5.0 3.5 files on diskettes. D. PBR shall hold harmless, indemnify and defend the City and its officers, employees, servant and agents serving as independent contractcors in the role of City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Director of Community Development or City Attorney frorrc any claim, demand, damage, Agreement for Preparation of: SPHERE OF INFLUENCE STUDY Page 3 liability, loss, cost or expense, for any damage whatsoever, including but not limited to death or injury to any person and injury to any property, resulting from misconduct, negligent acts, errors or omissions of PBR or any of its officers, employees or agents in the performance of this agreement, except such damage as is caused by the sole negligence of the City or any of its officers, employees, servants or agents. The City does not, and shall not, waive any rights that it may have against PBR by reason of Paragraph E hereof, because of the acceptance by the City, or the deposit with the City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this agreement. This hold harmless and indemnification provision shall apply regardless of whether or not said insurance policies are determined to be applicable to the claim, demand, damage, liability, loss, cost or expense described in Paragraph E hereof. E. PBR shall secure from a good and responsible company or companies doing insurance business in the State of California, pay for, and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this agreement that policies of insurance required by this paragraph and shall furnish to the City Clerk of the City certificates of said insurance on or before the commencement of the term of this agreement. Notwithstanding any inconsistent statement in any of said policies or any subsequent endorsement attached thereto, the protection offered by the policies shall: 1. Name the City and its officers, employees, servants and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Director Of Community Development or City Attorney, as Agreement for Preparation of: SPHERE OF INFLUENCE STUDY Page 4 additionally insured with PBR. 2. Insure the City and its officers and employees, while acting in the scope of their duties under this agreement against all claims, demands, damages, liabilities, losses, costs or expenses arising from, or in any way connected with, the performance of this agreement by PBR or the City. 3. Bear an endorsement or have attached a rider whereby it is provided that, in the event of cancellation or amendment of such policy for any reason whatsoever, the City shall be notified by mail, postage prepaid, not less that thirty (30) days before the cancellation or amendment is effective. PER shall give City thirty (30) days written notice prior to the expiration of such policy. 4. Be written on an Occurrence Basis. F. Consistent with the provisions of Paragraph E, PER shall provide general public liability including automobile liability and property damage insurance in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and annual aggregate. G. Consistent with the provisions of Paragraph E, PBR shall provide workers, compensation insurance as required by the California Labor Code. If any class of employees engaged by PER in work under this agreement is not protected by the workers' compensation law, PBR shall provide adequate insurance for the protection of such Agreement for Preparation of: SPHERE OF INFLUENCE STUDY Page 5 employees to the satisfaction of the City. H. PBR shall not assign this agreement, or any of the rights, duties or obligations hereunder. It is understood and acknowledged by the parties that PBR is uniquely qualified to perform the services provided for in this agreement. I. The City's Request for Proposal (RFP) dated May 7, 1990 and Response to said RFP are hereby incorporated into this agreement. Where said RFP and Response are modified by the agreement, the language contained in the City's Request for Proposal shall take precedence. J. Payment to PBR shall be made by the City within 45 days of receipt of invoice, except for those which are contested or questioned and returned by City, with written explanation within 30 days of receipt of invoice. PBR shall provide to City a written response to any invoice contested or questioned and further, upon request of City, provide City with any and all documents related to any invoice. K. Any notice to be given pursuant to this agreement shall be in writing, and all such notices and any other document to be delivered shall be delivered by personal service or by deposit in the United States mail, certified or registered, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid, and addressed to the party for whom intended as follows: Agreement for Preparation of:- SPHERE OF INFLUENCE STUDY Page 6 TO: City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Attention: City Manager TO: PBR, Inc. 18012 Sky Park Circle Irvine, CA 92714 Attention: Cheri Perisho Phelps, V.P. L. Nothing contained in this agreement shall be deemed, construed, or represented by the City or PBR or any third person to create the relationship of principal or any third person to crete the relationship of principal or agent, or of a partnership, or of a joint venture, or of any other association of any kind or nature between the City and PBR. M. This agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties concerning the subject matter hereof and all prior agreements or understandings, oral or written, are hereby merged herein. This agreement shall not be amended in any way except by a writing expressly purporting to be such an amendment, signed and acknowledged by both of the parties hereto. N. Should interpretation of. this agreement, or any portion thereof, be necessary, it is deemed that this agreement was prepared by the parties jointly and equally, and shall not be interpreted against either party on the ground that the party prepared the agreement or caused it to be prepared. O. No waiver of any provision of this agreement shall be deemed, or shall constitute, a waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar, nor shall any such waiver constitute a continuing or subsequent waiver of the same provision. nc waiver shall be binding, unless Agreement for Preparation of: SPHERE OF INFLUENCE STUDY Page 7 executed in writing by the partly making the waiver. P. In the event any action, suit or proceeding is brought for the enforcement of, or the declaration of any right or as a result of any alleged breach of any provision of this agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, from the losing party, and any judgment or decree rendered in such a proceeding shall include an award thereof. Q. cases involving a dispute between the City and PBR may be decided by an arbitrator if both sides agree in writing, with costs proportional to the judgment of the arbitrator. R. This agreement is made, entered into, executed in Ventura County, California, and any action filed in any court or for arbitration for the interpretation, enforcement or other action of the terms, conditions or covenants referred to herein shall be filed in the applicable court in Ventura County, California. S. The captions and headings of the various Articles and Paragraphs of this agreement are for convenience and identification only and shall not be deemed to limit or define the content of the respective Articles and Paragraphs hereof. IV. Responsible Individual The individual directly responsible for PBR's overall performance of the contract provisions herein above set forth and to serve as principal liaison between PBR and City shall Agreement for preparation of• SPHERE OF INFLUENCE STUDY Page 8 be Cheri Perisho Phelps Upon mutual written agreement of the parties, other individuals may be substituted in the above capacities as responsible individuals. V. Implementation The City shall provide PBR with written notice in advance of the date at which these services are to be implemented if different that the date of the agreement. CITY OF MOORPARK Bernardo Perez, Mayor PBR Cheri Perisho Phelps Vice President May 7, 1990 Mr. Patrick J. Richards, AICP Director of Community Development City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 Re: Sphere of Influence Study - Request for Proposal Dear Mr. Richards: EXHIBIT A -- RECEIVED J 13 L 2 6 1990 City of Moorpark Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal for planning services. The attached introductory discussion and scope of work reflect PBR's suggested approach to the project. I hope you find the proposal complete. We look forward to meeting with you and others as appropriate to discuss the Sphere of Influence Study and the General Plan Update at the appropriate time. Sincerely, PBR Cheri Perisho Phelps Vice President This proposal contains the following items pursuant to the format and content requested in the City's Request for Proposal. CONTENTS 1. A. Letter of transmittal B. Memorandum to proposal reviewer C. Scope of work 2. Qualifications of persons to be assigned to the project 3. List of references 4. Proposal price sheet (Attachment A) for Plan of Services Part I and II. 5. A description of the firm's understanding of the City's needs. 6. Limits of general liability and professional liability insurance and indemnification. 7. Identification of subcontractors. ITEM I.B. TO: Reviewers of the Proposal FROM: Cheri Phelps RE: City of Moorpark: Sphere of Influence Study- Request for Proposal PBR is pleased to submit this proposal in response to your Request for Proposal for services to accomplish a Sphere of Influence Study. The process of gaining LAFCO approval for a Sphere of Influence can be difficult, lengthy and costly. The process is complicated and the government code at times unwieldy. Our goal and approach taken in this proposal is to achieve for the City: 1) an analysis of the sphere area which is adequate in order that the City Council may comfortably and confidently determine an appropriate and justifiable sphere of influence 2) prepare documentation necessary to achieve LAFCO approval of the Sphere of Influence Amendment request; 3) assure that Sphere of Influence process allows for the current General Plan Update to proceed, resulting in Land Use and Circulation Elements which are useful, meaningful tools for guiding development; and 4) a General Plan Update and Sphere of Influence Study which minimizes consultant costs and minimizes delays to present schedules. I The RFP is well written and seems to reflect the same goals we've stated above. However, our experience with other projects and our recent discussions with Ventura County and other LAFCOs leads us to recommend modifications to the approach taken in the RFP. The key items which we recommend for modification, and why, are identified below: 1. A major part of the RFP Scope of Work, calls for the preparation of a "Plan for Services" (Part I, 1A) for the entire sphere area. A "Plan of Services" is required by government code section 56653. This relates to annexations only. A Plan of Services is a detailed and costly item which is not necessary to achieve LAFCO approval of a sphere amendment, nor can it be accomplished with reasonable accuracy based upon the data available today. The level of detail required in a Plan of Services is generally achievable only at the time of annexation, not with a Sphere of Influence request. At this point of annexation, a development proposal is likely to have been well thought out. In addition, a city will already have addressed the property to be annexed within the Elements of an adopted General Plan. Until a General Plan and its accompanying EIR have addressed the question of the appropriate location, kind and intensity of uses for property within a sphere area it is impractical and would represent too much of a "guesstimate" to prepare a Plan of Services as defined by LAFCO law. 2. LAFCO defines a Sphere of Influence Amendment application as a "project" under CEQA. As such LAFCO i� very unlikely to process the city's sphere request with out an EIR. LAFCO will accept an EIR which has been prepared for a General Plan Update if that EIR and General Plan Update include the sphere area. At present the General Plan Update and EIR do not include the sphere area. Thus it is likely, should the City proceed with its present strategy regarding the separation of sphere study and the General Plan Update that a separate EIR would have to be prepared for the sphere area. A separate EIR would add a substantial amount of time and costs to a Sphere of Influence Amendment schedule. In such a case., the city's Sphere of Influence and General Plan Update EIRs would both be prepared using similar analytical methods, data sources, etc. A single EIR covering both the sphere area and incorporated area would not only be more cost efficient but would perform an analysis from the more logical viewpoint of the City's ultimate configuration. Two separate EIRs would evaluate the city and its sphere as separate projects. It is our recommendation that the General Plan Update and EIR be expanded to include both the city and its sphere In view of the above, we suggest that city staff, PBR and Austin -Foust Associates (AFA) coordinate to amend the current General Plan Update and EIR scope of work to include the proposed Sphere of Influence area in the analysis. As we stated in our letter dated April 6, 1990, if the property located within a logical and appropriate sphere area is excluded from the current General Plan Update, the update process prevents the City from planning for the orderly development of those adjacent areas which will have a direct effect on the currently incorporated area. The General Plan is a document intended to plan comprehensively for the long term. The General Plan Update process presents an opportunity to develop local and regional solutions to issues such as traffic, employment opportunities, housing availability and fiscal solvency that are not achievable on a project by project basis. The larger the area of study, the more varied and innovative are the opportunities for solutions to planning issues. We continue to be concerned that the present General Plan Update scope of work (which includes only the unincorporated area) will result in the adoption of two elements which will be useful and valid for a relatively short time. As soon as a new Sphere of Influence is adopted, information, data and assumptions would he available which would very likely dictate changes to those two "new" elements. Should the city concur with the above approach, a "scaled down" scope of work could be pursued for the Sphere of Influence Study. Such a suggested scope of work is included herein. The scope of work, schedule and budget herein are contingent upon concurrent modifications to the present General Plan 1_ plate Scope of Work. ITEM I.C. CITY OF MOORPARK - SPHERE OF INFLUENCE STUDY SUGGESTED SCOPE OF WORK May 7, 1990 PHASE ONE: BASE MAPS /INTRODUCTORY EXHIBITS Task A: Prepare a base map which can be utilized at presentation and document scale. The geographic area covered will include the City and its logical sphere area. Task B: Prepare introductory exhibits (up to two) which clearly show the following: 1. Existing topography 2. Existing urban areas 3. Existing open space and agricultural areas 4. Existing zoning and related uses 5. Existing industrial uses (including but not limited to oil and mineral extraction per state law) 6. Existing major highways and freeways 7. Existing boundaries of the city or district and adjacent jurisdictions 8. Existing public ownership and public easements PHASE TWO: DRAFT LAFCO SUBMnTAL DOCUMENT Task A: Based upon land use designations and circulation improvements identified in the General Plan Update, prepare a written draft document including exhibits (as noted) which: 1. Identifies present and planned land uses and arterials in the proposed sphere area (one large and one document scale exhibit provided); 2. Identifies the present and probable need for public facilities and services in the sphere area (two document scale exhibits provided); 3. Identifies the present capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public services which the City /contractor provides or is authorized to provide; and 4. Identifies the existence of any relevant social or economic communities of interest in the area. S. Includes a narrative which: a. explains the relationship of the proposed sphere to existing City and County plans and programs; and b. provides justification for the sphere amendment request. Task B: Submit the above draft document to staff for review. Task C: Prepare a revised draft document per staff comments. Submit twenty (20) copies to staff for appropriate distribution. PHASE THREE: MEETINGS: THROUGH CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION Task A: 1. PBR will meet with staff two times regarding the preparation of the draft study. 2. Austin -Foust Associates will meet with staff one time regarding the preparation of the draft study. 3. PBR will attend one public hearing regarding the draft document. 4. Austin -Foust Associates will attend one city public hearing regarding the draft document. Additional meetings can occur with compensation on an hourly basis. PHASE FOUR: LAFCO SUBMITTAL Task A: Per City Council direction, PBR will revise the draft document and prepare the following for submittal to LAFCO: 1. Initial Study per CEOA Guidelines (2 copies) 2. LAFCO submittal document (50 copies) (content items are listed in Phase One above) 3. A current City of Moorpark General Plan (updated Land Use and Circulation Elements /other elements) 4. General Plan Update FIR (1 copy) 3 5. Draft cover letter of transmittal (for City edit signature) Task B: Submit the draft LAFCO submittal package to staff for final review. Task C: Modify as necessary per staff comments. Task D: Submit Sphere of Influence Amendment request package to LAFCO on behalf of the City. PHASE FIVE: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN (CIP) (OPTIONAL PHASE) The city's RFP mentions the desire for a CIP. Due to the largely undeveloped and large multiple ownerships nature of the proposed sphere area, it is likely that most capital improvements typically addressed in a CIP will be the responsibility of development applicants. Thus, any CIP prepared for the sphere area would be atypical. CIPs are usually intended as a tool for scheduling and anticipating financing of publicly funded infrastructure improvements. As so little will be known about future development proposals for the sphere area at the time this study is to be undertaken, estimations of infrastructure location, timing and sizing may be premature. It should be noted that the preparation of a CIP is not required for LAFCO approval of a sphere area. PBR recommends that the city defer this phase until future action by LAFCO is certain. Should the city choose to prepare a CIP at this time, we would recommend the following CIP scope of work be followed: In general, CIPs consist of three major elements: 1) the nature, location, and phasing of planned public improvements; 2) the cost of constructing the identified improvements; 3) the mechanisms used to finance such improvements. PBR's scope of work would be limited to the third element, that of the development of policies and strategies related to the financing of capital improvements. As such, we would rely upon the city's contract engineer, Wildan and Associates, to prepare 21 the first two elements: the programmatic and cost elements of the CIP. It would be appropriate and most cost effective if Wildan and Associates, which is already under contract with the city, has necessary background data, is familiar with city standards and has CIP experience were to perform this work. Our analysis would build upon the city's existing five -year CIP planning process. Task A: Meet with representatives of pertinent city departments (including Finance, Planning, and Public Works) to review the existing CIP and document major policy considerations and issues. Task B: Collect information on existing and projected service standards associated with services and facilities under the jurisdiction of the city. Task C: Collect information on CIP- related policies and practices of Ventura County and selected other cities in Ventura County in order to determine relevant emerging trends in government CIP practice. Task D: Conduct a limited number of interviews with major landowners located within sphere to determine private sector philosophy and approach to funding of capital improvements. Task E: Review data and analysis prepared by city contract engineer Task F: Prepare a written report containing the following items: 1. Statement of city CIP financing goals and policies; 2. Review of available funding sources and financing techniques; 3. Identification of financing strategies by CIP. Again, this is proposed as an OPTIONAL TASK. 9 PHASE SIX: PROJECT COORDINATION Task A: It is anticipated that coordination of the Sphere of Influence Study will include: 1. Telecommunications with staff 2. Three monthly status reports for review by staff and distribution as appropriate 3. Scope and contract coordination with AFA All meetings appear as separate phases. PHASE SEVEN: LAFCO MEETINGS Task A: PBR will attend the following number of meetings: 1. One meeting with city staff 2. Two meetings with LAFCO, LAFCO /city staff 3. Two LAFCO public hearings Additional meetings may occur with compensation on an hourly basis. Task B: Austin -Foust Associates will attend: 1. One meeting with LAFCO staff or LAFCO /city staff or exclusively city staff 2. One LAFCO public heanng C. PHASE EIGHT: REVISIONS AS REQUESTED BY LAFCO Task A: Minor LAFCO requests for exhibit changes or additio mentarionare included in this proposal. Additional research o substantial modificat' are not included. 7 Task B: Should LAFCO adopt a sphere boundary which is different than that submitted by the City, PBR will prepare a final modified reproducible exhibit and one final colored blackline reflecting the changes. 7 ITEM 2. QUALIFICATIONS OF PERSONS TO BE ASSIGNED TO THE PROTECT -Cheri Perisho Phelps - Vice President of PBR, will be responsible for the day to day management of the team efforts and products as project manager for the sphere of influence study. Ms. Phelps has managed complex planning projects which include public policy analysis and application and management of governmental /citizen group interaction. Ms. Phelps is currently responsible for the formulation and management of the Talega Valley Specific Plan and Annexation Strategy in San Clemente, a 3,510 -acre planned community; and the preparation of a general plan revision /EIR and expanded Sphere of Influence considerations for the City of Lake Elsinore. Ms. Phelps has worked with Orange County LAFCO staff, incorporation committee members and landowners regarding the incorporation of the new City of Dana Point. Ms. Phelps has been responsible for the management of general plans, specific plans, EIRs, environmental assessments and local coastal plans. William F. Masterson - Principal of PBR, would be responsible for the development of the capital improvement program (OPTIONAL PHASE). Mr. Masterson is President of PBR's Real Estate Financial Services Division and thus responsible for providing market, economic, and fiscal consulting services. Prior to this association with PBR he was a member of the National Real Estate Consulting Practice of Peat Marwick in Los Angeles and Director of Business Planning for the Irvine Company. Mr. Masterson is currently working with the City of Moorpark on the Carlsberg Specific Plan Fiscal Impact Report. Kenneth Ryan - Director at PBR, has contributed to policy studies related to large -scale master plans, land use strategy analysis, intergovernmental coordination and environmen- tal documentation. Mr. Ryan will serve as Project Manager in the preparation of the Sphere of Influence Study for the City of Moorpark. Most recently, Mr. Ryan was responsible for managing the Rolling Hills EIR and annexation strategy prepared in conjunction with a 3,000 -acre multi- jurisdiction mixed use planned community in south Orange County. Karen Gulley - Assistant Project Manager at PBR, has contributed to large -scale master plans, transportation improvement planning, parks and recreation planning, inter- governmental coordination and fiscal impact analysis. Ms. Gulley will assist in the preparation of the Sphere of Influence Study. Recnelty, Ms. Gulley was responsible for the management of the Local Parks Implementation Program and the Arterial Road Completion Program for the Champion Hills Specific Plan and Rolling Hills Feature Plan in San Clemente. Ms. Gulley also serves as the Project Manager in the preparation of the General Plan revision for the City of Lake Elsinore. Anne Kop rski - Graphic Designer at PBR, will have the responsibility of preparing the graphic support materials (including land use /zoning maps and citizen participation exhibits). Her most recent assignment included preparation of exhibits to accompany the General Plan and zoning documents for the newly incorporated cities of Solvang and Solana Beach. AUSTIN -FOU T ASSOCIATES Terrance W. Austin - Principal of Austin -Foust Associates, will act as the project director and have overall responsibility and review for the transportation section of the project. Mr. Austin has been involved in numerous transportation planning and engineering projects for public and private entities throughout the state of California. Joe E. Foust - Mr. Foust is a traffic engineer with extensive knowledge and 20 years experience in the Orange County area and formerly was the principal of JEF Engineer- ing. He was Head of the Transportation and Traffic Engineering Division for the City of Santa Ana for five years and has worked as a consultant on numerous engagements in Orange County. His principal areas of expertise include transportation system management, analysis of roadway /arterial highway alternatives, intersection and signal system design and capacity analysis, traffic management in residential areas, and microcomputer applications for solution of tniffic engineering problems. E ITEM 3. LIST OF REFERENCES COUNTY OF ORANGE Tom Mathews, Director of Planning Orange County, Environmental Management Agency (714) 834 -6200 Prg2jects Bolsa Chica Linear Park - General Development Plan Santa Ana Heights - Specific Plan/Local Coastal Program University Drive Deletion - EIR CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE Contact Persons Dave Gunderman, Director of Community Development (714) 674 -3129 Rom Smothers, Consultant Planner (Past Director of Community Development - City of Pomona) (714) 629 -8689 Projects Lake Elsinore General Plan Revisions Lake Elsinore General Plan EIR CITY OF ANAHEIM Contact Persons Jim Ruth, City Manager (714) 999 -5165 Joel Fick, Director of Community Development (714) 999 -5739 T-LQjects Anaheim Arena EIR Anaheim Stadium Area - Land Use Strategy Plan ITEM 4. ATTACHMENT A - PROPOSAL PRICE SHEET Project Phase PBR Labor PBR Reimbursables AFA Labor + Reimbursables Phase One: Base Maps /Introductory Exhibits 1,800 500 N/A Phase Two: Draft LAFCO Submittal Document 8,200 400 500 Phase Three: Meetings Through City Council Adoption 4,200 150 1,600 -2,100 Phase Four: LAFCO Submittal 3,050 600 300 Phase Five: Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) N/A N/A Phase Six: Project Coordination 4,250 300 N/A Phase Seven: LAFCO Meetings 7,000 300 1,600 -2,100 Phase Eight: Revisions as Requested by LAFCO 2,700 100 WA SUBTOTAL 31,200 2,350* * 4,000 -5,000 TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT*** = $38,903 * PBR recommends that the city does not pursue the preparation of a CIP until after LAFCO has approved the sphere of influence amendment request. * * Plus 15 percent administrative fee of 8353.00 = $2,703.00 * Consultant team will not exceed an arnount of $38,328 without direct authorization from the city. ITEM 5. DESCRIPTION OF PBR'S UNDERSTANDING OF THE ITY'S NEEDS Please refer to Item I.B. of this proposal. ITEM 6. LIMITS OF GENERAL AND PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCES PBR maintains insurance coverage protecting against claims for damage, injury or death of any person or property damage arising out of the performance of the work proposed herein. The insurance coverage includes broad comprehensive general liability, personal injury and automobile liability with limits of at least $1,000,000 combined single limit, per occurrence, and contractual liability insurance for the benefit of clients in a minimum amount of $1,000,000 with a broad form endorsement and without exclusion which insures performance by the firm. The client can be named as an additional insured and the insurance company can agree in writing to give the insured thirty days advance notice in writing before cancelling any insurance coverage. If required, PBR can provide an additional $1,000,000 of general liability coverage at a cost of $537 through May 1, 1989, and subsequently at an annual rate of approximately $1,000. The firm does not carry professional liability insurance for coverage such as errors and omissions due to the non - physical nature of the work provided. 14 ITEM 7. IDENTIFICATION OF SUBCONTRAC'T'ORS It is proposed that Austin -Foust Associates (AFA) will serve as circulation consultant for the sphere of influence study. The qualifications of persons assigned by AFA are noted in Item 2 of this proposal. In addition to AFA's current City of Moorpark General Plan Update work, AFA as a firm enjoys the following experience. Austin -Foust Associates - Austin -Foust Associates is a transportation and traffic engineering consulting firm providing professional expertise to both the public and private sectors. The firm's goal is to provide the best traffic and transportation engineering services available through highly qualified personnel. Austin -Foust Associates uses a variety of techniques for analyzing traffic and transporta- tion issues, including computer technology. The experience of the firm's personnel in transportation planning and traffic operations for new planned communities, as well as established areas, provides the special skills necessary for determining imaginative, practical, and meaningful solutions to transportation problems. Austin -Foust Associates offers responsive consultation by maintaining close and continuous communication with the client, while adhering to the project budget and schedule. Representative projects completed by Austin -Foust Associates include the following. City of Encinitas - General Plan Update. City of Orange - Traffic model development and General Plan Update. Newport Beach General Plan - Traffic model development and General Plan Update. Valencia Area Traffic Analysis - Traffic model development and preparation of long - range circulation plan for future communit} of 250,000. 1c r Oxnard TSraftic Analysis - Traffic model development and General Plan Update. Tustin Traffic Analysis - Traffic model and circulation system update. Irvine - Citywide traffic model, and small area models and circulation analyses for selected subareas. South Coast Metro Area - Traffic model and long -range traffic analysis, including a major freeway access evaluation. AFA is currently working with the City of Moorpark on the Carlsberg Specific Plan and the General Plan Update. 1 t) ITEM 8 GENERAL COMPANY INFORMATION A brochure summarizing PBR's experience, qualifications and organization is attached for your review. A schedule for performance of work follows M CITY OF MOORPARK - SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AMENDMENT MONTH One Two Council i Approval of j Submit General I Draft Plan Update) LAFCO and EIR i Submittal (Package to Staff Three Four council ' � Submittal Action ,r Seven Draft to L, ^,FCO Submittal i Five Six Seven LAFCO First Staff LAFCO ( LAFCO Review public Action Hearing Please note that the attatched schedule for completion of the Sphere of Influence Study is dependent upon the acceptance by the City of our suggested approach to this project (ie., revised General Plan Update scope of work and acceptance of the sphere scope of work herein). Also note that if the City chooses to pursue the approach suggested by PBR, ^•••h.. C'�rinr�I Dlon I Ir,r -1 -stn �nrl CID onhorlln mrct hc� nvtAnrl cr1 SENj- BY :Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 9 -13 -90 ; 13 :35 - PBR 7142612128- 805 529 8270;« 2 SCOPE OF WORK AMENDMENT EXHIBIT "A" PHA E I: GENERAL PLAN UPDATE STRATEGY REFINEMENT /DATA COLLEC- TION TAS 1: REFINE PROJECT SCHEDULE /COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION PROGRAM OB CTIVE: Develop a refined project schedule including the timing for citizen parti ipation in the general plan process. ME1 OD: Public participation for the General Plan update will involve a series of pub ly noticed informational workshops sponsored by the Planning Commission on non - he g dates. Public input acquired through the workshop process will be transmitted to I City Council for specific direction on subsequent work tasks. Work on the project Will I iot continue until the City Council has established this direction. This task will involve the preparation of an overall project schedule as well as a defirltive workshop schedule, in collaboration with city staff, to ensure that public partitipation is maximized throughout the process. Workshops could be held at the follokng suggested milestones: Review of Alternative Plans, Draft Goals and Objectives Review of Preliminary Draft Land Use and Circulation Elements and EIR UCT: Timetable and description of preliminary meeting topics for community pation in the General Plan revision process. 2 SENT BY :Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 9 -13 -90 ; 13:35 7142612128.4 805 529 8270.« 3 2: PREPARE BASE MAPS Ensure utilization of accurate base maps of the existing conditions upon to base each element of the general plan to be updated. 'D: Consultant review of existing county base maps and city maps; comparative with aerial photographs and field surveys as required to prepare base maps. PR UCT: Two base maps (at presentation and document scales): l) immediate incor- pora d area, 2) incorporated area and proposed sphere of influence area. 3: REVIEW AND EVALUATE EXISTING DATA,/DEVELOP PLANNING BASE DATA OBJ CTIVE: Compile all existing information necessary for preparation of the general plan update; organize a comprehensive planning data base; and identify missing or incomplete data prior to initiation of planning studies. ME OD: Each member of the project team will prepare a checklist of the types of data needed to prepare the general plan update. These lists will be compiled by PBR and ased to coordinate a centralized effort to acquire necessary existing data. Each member of the consultant team will review existing data, sort out that which is valid, and identify data gaps. From the base data review and analysis, existing community con Lions and trends will be identified. A lot -by -lot inventory will also be conducted as part of this effort. Basic community needs /problems, opportunities and constraints affe�ng the city's evolution to the year 201.0 will also be identified as related to the n Use Element and Circulation Element. This task, while completed for the gyrated area, will be repeated for the proposed sphere of influence area. UCT: A baseline data report containing text and graphics depicting existing base conditions, trends, needs, opportunities and constraints. The baseline data report 2 SENT BY :Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 9 -13 -90 ; 13:36 ; 7142612128-1 805 529 8270:: will a organized to reflect both the Land Use and Circulation Elements. As a result of thi September 1990 contract amendment, amend the baseline data report to include data elevamt to the proposed sphere of influence area pursuant to the above objective and ethodoloay. 4: TRAFFIC FORECAST /CIRCULATION ANALYSIS O CTIVE: To compile all existing information on the current circulation system, to iden fy the potential impacts on the existing system, to determine current and future traffir generation and distribution, volume and capacity. Three concept alternatives have been developed for the incorporated area as of May 1990. This task will be repeated for a proposed sphere of influence area and thus four additional traffic model alteratives will be run as a result of the September 1990 contract amendment. Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZ) identified for the May 1990 alternatives will be u ' ' d to cover the addition of the sphere area. 10D: This task will involve using land use data to produce long -range traffic sts. Of importance in forecasting is the separation of local and regional traffic ments. The former will be based on countywide traffic analysis data, while the will be derived from land use forecasts within the city and its sphere of influence. In Idition, a comprehensive modeling analysis of the city's circulation system will be Specific issues to be covered include the following; Potential impacts of the 118/23 freeway connection, as quantified by street and intersection levels of service. The primary circulation element scenario will be general plan buildout with all amendments approved, with a second scenario based on all development preceding the freeway connection. Estimate volumes of 'pass through" traffic, ie., that traffic with both trip ends outside of the city. These estimates shall include the pass through traffic on SENT BY :Xerox Tel ecopier 7020 ; 9 -13 -90 ; 13:'x" ; be 714261.2126-o 805 529 8270;« 5 Route 118 as well as the pass through traffic on Route 23, potential land use changes, circulation or growth inducement. The effects of extending New Los Angeles Avenue to Collins Avenue. Potential downgrading of the Los Angeles Avenue width requirements through the Virginia Colony area. The effects of the extension of High Street westerly from its existing terminus to Gabbert Road north of the railroad. Potential transportation corridors for Route 23 and Route 118, including required right -of -way and Route 118 freeway ramps. The effect of extending Spring Road northerly from High Street to Broadway. DUCT. Baseline traffic analysis and modeling of existing conditions as well as iative circulation scenarios. A total of eight alternative circulation scenarios will ialyzed (existing General Plan, three General Plan Alternatives for incorporated only [May 1990], three alternatives which include the incorporated city and sphere and the preferred alternative. TASK 1; IDENTIFY ISSUES OBJ CTTVE: Focus the general plan program on areas of special interest and concern, toe tablish an overall issue framework for developing various plan alternatives for the City of Moorpark and its proposed sphere of influence. l SENT DY :Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 9 -13 -90 ; 13 :3b ; 7142612128-4 805 529 8270,= ME OD: Identification of issues will be based on discussions with the city, review of existing data and the baseline data report. Pursuant to the September 1990 contract ame ent, this task, while concluded for the incorporated area, will be repeated for the prop sed sphere area. PRO UCT: A priority list of key issues and problems, constraints and opportunities to be a dressed in the general plan for the City of Moorpark. This list will be updated to refle t the additional proposed sphere of influence area to the General Plan Update stud area. 2: DEVELOP GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OB CTIVE: Identify goals and policies which have been adopted by the City Council and egional agencies. Establish broad policies in the form of goals and objectives which can a used in developing and testing alternatives for the general plan update. ME OD: Existing city goals, objectives and policies for the City of Moorpark as well as r quired programs will be reviewed. Meetings with city staff will be held to develop a HE of potential goals and objectives which address major planning issues currently co r:tgy Moorpark, as well as those issues that may confront the community over the next years and beyond. These issues will include general as well as specific items. In addition to the more standard goals, objectives and policies developed during this the following specific topics will be addressed: Create goals and policies related to obtaining an overall mix of single family and multifamily housing units based upon community desires and consistency with RHNA numbers. Create goals and policies related to rninimum parcel sizes in open space and areas over 20 percent slope. SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 9 -13 -90 : 13: and 7142612128- 805 529 8270;; 7 Create goals and policies to preserve and protect features of cultural and historical significance to the community and identify such by site. Create goals and policies to save and protect mature trees within the community. Create goals and policies related to the need to adopt guidelines to mitigate the impact of exterior lighting and noise on and from adjoining parcels and adjacent public right -of -way. Create goals and policies regarding future hillside development. Goals and policies should promote open space and agricultural uses in those areas over 20 percent slope. Also, such goals and policies will related to the identification and preservation of major ridgelines and scenic viewsheds. Create goals and policies related to the need to protect the visual freeway corridor (118/23 freeway connector ). Create goals and policies which will ensure that site planning and design of development respects the predominantly 1= profile suburban environment of Moorpark and enhances as well as respects the surrounding natural features. Create goals and policies which identify appropriate land use designations in canyon areas within the incorporated area and proposed sphere of influence area. Create goals and policies regarding the extension of public services in areas which provide significant natural constraints to development. DUCT: A preliminary report compiling potential goals and policies organized d the general plan element framework. This document will form the basis to op further discussion and to discern attitudes toward specific policies for the city its sphere of influence area as a whole. Draft goals and policies were nearly SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 9 -13 -90 ; i3:3 7142612128- 805 529 8270;» 5 com ete as of May 1990. Review and expansion of the draft will be performed in order that a sphere of influence area be adequately addressed. 1: DEVELOP CONCEPT ALTERNATIVES OBJ CTIVE: To establish realistic measurements of physical and socioeconomic trends for upe in structuring goals, policies and strategies. To develop concept alternatives for the fiture of the community based on goals and objectives. These alternatives will be base on circulation improvements needed to relieve stress on the existing circulation syste i a and improvements needed for future development. One development scenario will be b Lsed on development preceding the 11.8/23 freeway connection.. )D: Based on review of past trends in -the county and city and needed circulation ments, the consultant team will prepare potential scenarios for future growth and in Moorpark. These forecasts will be used primarily to assist in establishing realiftic strategies for the city to adopt. Projections will be made to the year 2010 in sele ed areas. Long -range factors, such as the following, will be considered in preparing the narin-,- Population characteristics and needs Economic base /market analyses City revenues and expenditures Changes in the way cities are built (transportation, energy, etc.) scenarios will also analyze all current general plan amendment applications and recommendations regarding each. An additional analysis involving each tion entails a review at a lower land use designation as well as the next higher .y over the current designation. W SENT BY :Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 9 -13 -90 ; 13 :4G 7142612126-4 605 529 8270;9 9 Indi ual topics of concern that will be analyzed during the preparation of alternative include: Areas south of Los Angeles Avenue from Spring Road to Liberty Bell Road. Potential multiple family residential land uses south of Majestic Court and west of Moorpark Avenue. A commercial office designation for the southwest corner of Los Angeles Avenue and Spring Road. The Stratthern Ranch property with an emphasis of potential growth impacts to the city. Freeway Business Center (Science Drive) ensuring that this area is appropriately indicated in the new land use element. Nappy Camp Canyon Park illustrating precise boundaries. North side of Los Angeles Avenue between the Edison substation and American Products building. Natural features within the city and the proposed sphere of influence that require protective measures. Consider both the growth and non - growth areas of the Countywide Planning Program (CPP) and the city's need to provide buffers or transitional zones. Consider the appropriateness of the application of CPP designations regarding growth versus non - growth for the city area and proposed sphere of influence area. SENT BY :Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 9 -13 -90 ; 13.41 ; 7142612128 II 805 529 8270;:11 Base on these potential scenarios, the consultant will develop alternatives for land use patt ns, including considerations of required infrastructure and relationship to other 1 spe ' c elements of the general plan. Three alternative concepts will be completed for revie which reflect only the incorporated area. Three alternative concepts will be deve ped which reflect the incorporated area and the proposed sphere of influence area. 7Ci. Six alternative concept plans based on different fundamental assumptions to future growth and development in the City of Moorpark and its proposed of influence. 2: EVALUATE ALTERNATIVE CONCEPT PLANS ()BJ CT +: Evaluate alternative concept plans and alternatives to reflect the circu ation and land use analysis and select a preferred alternative on which the general plan lements will be based. MX1 OD: An initial technical evaluation of alternatives will be made in relation to phys ML social, economic, environmental resources of the community and the results of the ( rculation. analysis. Alternatives will be weighed in relation to potential environmen- tal i lipacts as well as their responsiveness to the needs and objectives of Moorpark. Clea delineation of the technical evaluation will be important in the decision - making proc ss of selecting an alternative. Due to modifications to the General Plan Update stmt gies as directed in May 1990, the analysis and presentation of the alternatives will oc in two phases; first phase presented at: the May 1990 Workshop #4 and the second phas will be presented at Workshop #5. VKC UCT. A final preferred planning alternative and land use map will be prepared to s e as the basis for finalization of the updated Land Use and Circulation Elements. This preferred alternative may be a composite of components from ,the five separate alte tives studied. It will be a consensus plan which establishes the direction for the mor detailed planning efforts in later tasks. SENT V: Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 9 -13 -90 : 13:4F 7142612128 F o µ ;i 805 52„ 8270: »11 1: DEVELOP COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN ELEMENTS OSJ CTIVE: Development of a clear, concise summary of policies and general plan processes for use as a continuing implementation tool. To prepare each draft element for I iblic review and evaluation in a program ETR. To revise the draft elements to refle t comments received and to prepare final plan elements for adoption. MEI OD: A modular notebook will be the basic organizational device for the two elements of the general plan. The plan will detail elements /topics mandated by state laws plus additional topics unique to the needs of the City of Moorpark, including a disc sion of historical resources, air quality and energy conservation, natural resource pres rvation, protection of visual corridors and the maintenance of a low profile suburban r] A bI is objective in the preparation of the general plan is to focus the land uses around the bility to provide adequate circulation and infrastructure improvements. Flexibility to a ommodate minor refinements in community needs will make the plan a more viable doct nent for continuing use. Each element c;f the general plan will contain a summary of to and analysis, adopted policies, and mplementadon strategies related to that ele nt. Caen ral Plan elements will be prepared based upon information obtained in prior tasks. Dr general plan elements will be reviewed by city staff. The draft general plan will be repared in conjunction with the EIR.. All comments received on the draft plan ele ents will be complied by the consultant team and documented in writing. Responses to a ch comment will be prepared and submitted to the city for review. Copies of the draf final plan elements will then be submitted to the city for final public review. The plan elements will be formatted to assure integration and consistency among all gen al plan elements and will be presented in a loose -leaf binder to facilitate revisions. 1 SENT BY :Xerox Telecopier 7020 : 9 -13 -90 ; 13 :42 7142612128+ 805 529 8270. 912 SpJLont c recommendations for changes to other elements of the general plan to make thinternally consistent will also be provided. Maintenance procedures for the do involving possible computer applications will be recommended. The plan elen ma ts will also be written in a concise fort, with goal statements and policies sop to from the main body of each element for ease of reference. PRO UCT: As described in subtasks below, one hundred (100) copies (maximum) of the i I raft plan elements will be prepared for city staff and public review and for evalu ition in the EIR. One hundred (100) copies (maximum) final versions of the plan elem nts will be compiled into 3 -ring note binders; element divider tabs will be prepared. The locument will be reproduced and delivered to the city, In ai dition to final general plan elements, an executive summary will be produced for broad community dissemination. This executive summary will concisely describe the gene al plan update and accompanying environmental process in both a narrative and grip is context, discuss each mandatory element included in the general plan. One - hun ed (100) copies of the executive summary will be produced. Four final colored gene al plan maps at a scale of 1" = 500' will be submitted to city staff following the ado 'on of the general plan elements in addition to five standard blacklines. SUBTASK UA: REVISE CIRCULATION ELEMENT To revise the circulation element and map based on the circulation and work in close liaison with the city, county and Caltrans. OD: Specific elements of work included in the preparation of the circulation .t involve the following: Develop right -of -way and number of lanes (including parking) and street section recommendations for arterials, secondaries and collector streets. 11 SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7020 : 9 -13 -90 : 13:41; 7142612128 605 529 8270: 413 Provide specific street plan recommendations for the area bounded by Los Angeles Avenue, Arroyo Simi, Maureen Lane and Liberty Bell Road. Locate all future traffic signals on major arterials. Develop bicycle /pedestrian /equestrian trail plans with detailed cross - sections and standards. Identify policies for driveway placement, stop sign installation, parking restrictions, intersection sight distance, meandering sidewalk, unobstructed sidewalk, etc. Estimate major intersection levels of service under each of the following scenarios: Existing Cumulative Ultimate Revise standard roadway intersection plates_ Review, and revise as necessary, county bikeway plates. Develop a specific street plan (circulation) layout for the area bounded by the Southern Pacific Railroad, Highway 118, the Southern California Edison substation and DP -302. Provide recommendations relative to an east -west arterial or collector from Broadway to the eastern city limits. Identify potential grade separation locations for railroad crossings. Prepare alternative alignments for Lassen Avenue to connect to Moorpark Avenue. 12 SEAN BY :Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 9 -13 -90 ; 13 :44 Provide freeway corridor visual design standards 7142612128 -4 805 529 8270;214 The bove tasks are feasible to be accomplished in detail for developed areas or areas whe future development components are known. In areas where future development Will a defined through a specific plan process or where future development characteris- tics a very conceptual, the items listed above may be addressed in policy format only. For xample, it will not be possible to "locate all future traffic signals..." in specific plan as the location of arterials and intersections is as yet unknown. The esults of these work tasks will be reviewed and incorporated into a comprehensive circu ation element which is compatible with the goals and objectives established in Phase lI, ffie circulation analysis in Phase III and the land use elements. Options or alte tives for system improvements will be highlighted. The recommended element and any ternatives will be evaluated by the consultant team and will be reviewed with city staff�l A complete draft circulation element will then be prepared. PR UCT: A draft circulation element one hundred (100) copies (maximum) with pro sed system improvements and classifications will be prepared for review by city staff and I the public. Following public review, one hundred (100) copies (maximum) of a irc4ation element will be prepared for city adoption. 1B: REVISE LAND USE ELEMENT - 'TIVE: To revise the element to reflect current and future conditions, including lation conditions, land use policies, and land use designations which are consistent the best interests of the community and market constraints and opportunities. OD: A detailed land use plan will be prepared, based upon review of the ed alternative concept plan prepared in previous phases. Elements of this plan 13 SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 9 -13 -90 ; 13:44 ; it In the 7142612128- 805 529 8270; "15 Delineation of boundaries and calculation of acreage. Assignment of specific land uses, intensities, and other site characteristics. Statistical analysis which tabulates and summaries land uses, acreages, and square footages. to identified goals, policies and objectives, the land use element will include g special items: Identify areas subject to specific plan approval plus list in general terms land uses permitted within. Identify appropriate residential, commercial, and industrial reserve areas in both the incorporated area and the proposed sphere of influence. Studies of the existing or future population density patterns within the city. Emphasis must be placed on those areas either designated for potential redevelopment or high - growth area or within the city's sphere of influence. Preparation of a report providing projections of those elements, such as population, income, and employment which will f >recast the land required, public facilities, needed and future distribution of land ases through the year 2010. Establish city gateways and identify land uses *o promote a desired identity as defined by goals and policies. Create standards for recreation uses needed for development of a parkland dedication ordinance. SENT BY :Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 9 -13 -90 ; 13:45 7142612128- o 805 52„ 8270;zi6 i i Create commercial design overlay areas with specific goals and policies related to development. Review land use designations in light of service capacity of various infrastructure systems (sewer, waste, streets, storm drains, flood control, etc.). Incorporate goals and policies of the downtown plan into the land use element of the plan. Make certain that the Moorpark Land Use Element is consistent with and takes into account any other applicable county plans. Identify areas for potential annexation to the city based upon the results of the sphere of influence study. Identify publicly owned land and produce a list of permitted uses. Create a document that can be used as an effective tool to update the city's zoning ordinance. Ad 'onal changes to the existing land use element for incorporation into the new ele i nt, including the follow-ing: I Land use element, page 41, neighborhood commercial center - cbange to eliminate the requirement for a "convenience market." Land use element, page 42, revise section on commercial /industrial mix. Land use element, page 42, revise growth table population projections. 15 BENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 9 -13 -90 13:41 7142612128-+ 805 529 8270.17 Land use element, t pag 57 Table 9 revise zoning comparability matrix (use same design for general plan and zoning). YK DUCT: A draft land use element one hundred (100) copies (maximum) with prop sed system improvements and classifications will be prepared for review by city staff and he public. Legal review of the documents will certify that they meet state law. Foll wing public review, one hundred (100) copies (maximum) of a final land use ele9 nt will be prepared for city adoption. TAS� 2: PREPARE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT TIVE: To prepare an environmental impact report in compliance with state law. mental factors are taken into consideration when reviewing alternatives and wing land use and density designations, resulting in the incorporation of nental information throughout the document. The EIR will contain measures e for the mitigation of adverse impacts, and will provide the legal basis for , aaton and action upon the general plan- ME' OD: EIR preparation for a general plan must reflect a broad policy or issue orie tation (CEQA Guidelines Section 15146). Further, this EIR can best be utilized whe it is closely integrated with the general plan itself. Ale tial study for the Moorpark General Plan land use and circulation element updates wrepared for the General Plan Update which included only the incorporated altive in its "project description," A second Initial Study will be prepared and diuted which will address the city and itc proposed sphere of influence area, The co art team will assist city staff in the preparation and distribution of the Notice of Pration for the General Plan. (Again, to be prepared a second time, pursuant to thdition of the sphere to the study area) :6 SENT BY :Xerox Telecopier 7020 : 9 -13 -90 : 13:47 7142612128 605 529 8270:18 Foll g collection of pertinent data and the preparation of necessary technological stud s, a screencheck EIR (analyzing the combined city and sphere study area) for the Mo ark General Plan land use and circulation element updates will be prepared which des 'bes those general plan elements, documents the existing environmental setting, do ents environmental impacts and recommends mitigation measures. The following Subjects will be addressed: a. Landform /topography b. Geology and soils C. Hydrology /food control d. Biology e. Cultural resources L Existing and planned land uses g. Traffic /circulation /parking h. Socioeconomic conditions i. Public services and utilities j. Noise k. Air quality /climate 1. Energy consumption M. Visual character and aesthetics IL Housing o. Population /socioeconomic characteristics P. Cumulative impacts of approved and filed projects Speglal attention will be given to: 1. Traffic /circulation Z. Community services a. Solid waste collection b. Fire protection C. Police protection 17 SENT DY:Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 9 -13 -90 1':47 Ci 7142612128 -+ 805 529 8270; -19 d. Library services e. Parks /recreation services f. Health and emergency services g. School facilities 3. Hillsides and open space 4. Visual impacts S. Public utilities a. Water facilities b. Sewer facilities C. Telephone service d. Electricity e. Natural gas f. Flood control 6. Growth - inducing impacts 7. Mitigation measures g• The EIR alternatives will include the following: Alternative 1 - No Project (existing general plans for the overall study area) Alternative 2 - A less intense alternative for the overall study area Alternative 3 - A more intense alternative for the overall study area Alternative 4 - The "Proposed Project" for the city area and a 'No Project" (existing County General Plan) for the proposed sphere expansion area on review of the sereencheck EIR by city staff, a draft EIR will be prepared. The ltant team will assist the city in distribution of the draft EIR, and a Notice of letion will be prepared, ents received through the public review process will be responded to in the final After public hearings on the final EIR and certification of the final EIR by the Council, a Notice of Determination will be prepared for the State Clearinghouse. OR SENT QY:Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 9 -13 -90 13:G8 1� v 7142612128 805 529 8270; «20 PRO UCT: A general plan land use and circulation element update EIR which reflects the licy -level orientation of the two general plan elements and provides a framework for vision- makers to identify the more detailed environmental consequences of general plan mplementation. All notices for processing the EIR will be completed. Fifteen (15) copi of a screencheck EIR will be completed for review. Comments received on the sere check EIR will be incorporated in the Draft EIR fifty (50) copies. After public revi ,hearings and certification, twenty-five (25) copies of the Final EIR will be prep red, and incorporated into the general plan document. The Final EIR will include resp nse to comments, including responses to public comments, staff reports and final EIR certificatinn_ V: DEVELOP IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS OB CTIVE: Develop suggested specific measures for alternative methods of impl rnenting each general plan element (Circulation and Land Use) to reflect the goals, obje fives and policies defined in Phase II. ME I HOD: Alternative implementation programs will be suggested for evaluation by the city. • Alternatives will be analyzed in terms of goal /policy achievement, workability, and viab financing mechanisms. Recommendations for the maintenance of the documents Will 11)e included. PR [DUCT: Suggested specific measures for implementation of the general plan Circ lation and Land Use Elements, including update and review procedures, for ultimate inset ion into the general plan. P E VI: COMPLETE PUBLIC REVIEW, GENERAL PLAN ADOPTION, AND EIR CERTIFICATION XTIVE: Submittal of final draft general plan, implementation programs and related for public hearing and ultimate adoption. 19 SENT BY :Xerox Telecopier 7020 ; 9 -13 -90 ; 13 :49 7142612128 805 529 8270 21 MElion OD: The public review process has been described in the PRODUCT section of eacelement of the comprehensive general plan program, and is depicted in the work schule. Submittal of a final draft comprehensive general plan, EIR and associated iinpmentation plan to city staf% public review for formal public hearing, approval and ado of General Plan, implementation programs and certification of EIR. Adopted reviewed general plan, implementation programs and certified EIR. I 20 CITY OF NOORPARK - GENERAL PLAT( REVISION DLOGEI 616189 (REVISED SEPTEMBER 1990) Tasks PBR POR Labor Labor Won-Labor PDR Austin- Total Foust Total Existing Conditions' Collect &Analyze Data $6,500,00 $1,500.00 510,000,00 $1,700.00 $8,000.00 $10,500.00 f18,500,00 511,700,00 571,700.00 DIME II Identify Issues Develop Goals Il Policies 55,000 -Qo 51,000.00 55,000.00 51,000.00 $6,000.00 S6,000.0o $6,000.00 S6,0oo.00 P KA SE I [ I Circulation Amtysia 7 } 2­__ 'o L -t- �J�1�� Develop Alternative con / Plans Refine T 510,730.00) 52,250.00 538 750.00 38 i' (,`750 preferred Alternative at! 53,800:00 12,980.00 &750'0 &12 :1,400.00 �f5,200.00 t9�0.00 .�. Z ?3��j 55;250:64 PHASE IV 'evelOP C- P4dwmTve General Plan rr�d ase Fiescrtt C,'rLvta;�on Element /Circulation FIR &6,000.00 $1,000.00 Plan $6,000,00 51,300.00 _ 57,000 DD $7,000.00 f 513,500.00. t2,500.CC'3�'� ` !26,500.00 1 $16,000.00 233,600.00 RASE �'S16,000.00)C�? V _ -10P ;,"Plen'Ttation Guidelines $3,000.00 5500.00 53,500.00 $3,500.00 4ASE V1 blic Hearings— 57,000.00 S1,300.00 $8,300.00 $8,300.00 TAL k$76,530 00,E 515,450.00 591,980,00 5�75'7'S0 OOy 5167,730 00 Austfn-Foust bcx40et �� ��`�� (• �� }� l �' L� QQ��� includes model Includes set -up, j t�ao Planning Cemmssion hearings, two City Calmed hearings and a total of 8 Pubtic workshops. 21 v z Q X -T X co 1 w I a w A N rn N co Co 0 cn n7 <c, co N v 0 rr: ,