HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1990 1107 CC REG ITEM 08UMOORPARK
BERNARDO M. PEREZ.
�4�
STEVEN KUENY
Mayor
City Manager
SCOTT MONTGOMERY
f - -y' /�� X2;1
CHERYL J. KANE
Mayor Pro Tern
7
��'
City Attorney
ELOISE BROWN
�� T �� ,�
PATRICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
Councilmember
CLINT
9 Via"
°�q��
Director of
HARPER, Ph.D.
°rE_
Community Development
Councilmember
�`
R. DENNIS DELZEIT
PAUL W. LAWRASON, Jr.
City Engineer
Councilmember
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
LILLIAN KELLERMAN
Chief of Police
City Clerk
RICHARD T. HARE
City Treasurer
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community Development
DATE: November 6, 1990
SUBJECT: CORRECTIONS TO RESOLUTIONS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR
CPD'S 89 -1 AND 89 -2, RPD -89 -1, AND LDN -89 -2 (MISSION BELL
PLAZA AND GREENLEAF APARTMENT PROJECT)
Attached are revised resolutions for the above referenced
entitlements and proposed revisions to conditions of approval for
the parcel map and the commercial project. New text is
highlighted. Also attached is the EIR certification resolution.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Attachments:
EIR Resolution
RPD -89 -1 Resolution
CPD's 89 -1 and 89 -2 Resolution and Revised Conditions
LDM -89 -2 Resolution and Revised Conditions
PJR /DST
cc: Steven Kueny, City Manager
John Knipe, City Engineer
r`'OORPARK. CgUFORNIA
Clfy Cou II Meeting
of -�
I 99A
BY.
a4�4cl-
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 18051 5Pg_RRA4
RESOLUTION NO. 90-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AS ADEQUATE,
APPROVING THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM,
AND INCLUDING REQUIRED FINDINGS AND STATEMENT
OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATION PURSUANT TO THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
FOR COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMITS
NOS. CPD -89 -1 AND CPD -89 -2, RESIDENTIAL
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. RPD -89 -1, AND
LAND DIVISION NO. LDM -89 -2.
WHEREAS, applications have been filed by Macleod Development
Company and Ventura Pacific Capital Company for the above
referenced entitlements to allow construction of Mission Bell Plaza
commercial center and the Greenleaf Apartment Project on properties
located north of Los Angeles Avenue, south of Poindexter Avenue,
west of Park Lane and east of Sierra and Shasta Avenues (APN's:
511 - 080 -195, 205, 215, 245, 255, 265, 315, 325, and 327); and
WHEREAS, the Mission Bell Plaza and Greenleaf Apartments
Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 89042617) provides an
environmental assessment of the proposed projects in accordance
with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and State CEQA
Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, public notice of the availability of the Draft
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the above referenced
entitlement permits was provided in compliance with CEQA; and
WHEREAS, at duly noticed public hearings on June 4, June 11,
and July 2, 1990, the Planning Commission considered the
applications (CPD's 89 -1 and 2) filed by Macleod Construction
Company and Ventura Pacific Capital Company requesting approval to
construct the Mission Bell Plaza commercial center; considered the
applications (RPD -89 -1 and LDM -89 -2) filed by Macleod Construction
Company to construct the Greenleaf Apartment Project and to
subdivide their property into separate commercial and residential
lots (including dedication of roadway right -of -way); and considered
public testimony received regarding the Draft EIR; and
WHEREAS, at duly noticed public hearings on July 25, August 1,
August 15, September 5, September 19, and October 17, 1990, the
City Council considered the applications filed by Macleod
Construction Company and Ventura Pacific Capital Company and
considered the information contained in the staff reports and in
the EIR; and
WHEREAS, the City Council closed the public hearing for the
Draft EIR at its meeting of September 19, 1990, considered the
draft Final EIR at its meeting of October 17, 1990, and reached its
decision to certify the Final EIR;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. A Final EIR has been completed in compliance with
CEQA (Division 13 of the Public Resources Code of the State of
California). The City Council has received and considered the
information contained in the Final EIR prior to acting on the
proposed projects and has found that this document adequately
addresses the environmental effects of the proposed projects.
SECTION 2. The Final EIR has identified significant
cumulative environmental effects of the project relative to air
quality, noise, and traffic, and Findings and a Statement of
Overriding Considerations are attached as Exhibit A to this
resolution in compliance with CEQA, and incorporated herein by
reference.
SECTION 3. The City Council finds that the Statement of
Overriding Considerations can be adopted in that the benefits of
the proposed projects outweigh the unavoidable environmental
effects of said impacts as addressed in Exhibit A and in the record
of both Planning Commission and City Council meetings.
SECTION 4. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has been prepared
in compliance with Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code.
The City Council has received and considered the Mitigation
Monitoring Program, attached as Exhibit B and incorporated herein
by reference, prior to takin(j final action on the proposed
projects.
SECTION 5. The City Council certifies the Final EIR for the
Mission Bell Plaza and Greenleaf Apartment Projects.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1990.
Bernardo M. Perez, Mayor
City of Moorpark
ATTEST:
City Cler
Attachments:
Exhibit A - Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
Exhibit B - Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Pro ram
g
4l i_ i
FINDINGS FOR THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR)
FOR MISSION BELL PLAZA
(UPPER AND LOWER COMMERCIAL COMPONENT)
NOVEMBER 7,1990
The following Findings for CPD 89 -1, 89 -2 and LD-M 89 -2 (Mission Bell Plaza - Upper and Lower
Commercial Component and Parcel Map) have been made pursuant to the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 of the Public Resources Code of the State of California, Section
15091 of the CEQA Guidelines).
The City Council of the City of Moorpark has determined that the environmental issues, effects and
mitigation of the proposed Mission Bell Plaza (Upper and Lower Commercial component and Parcel
Map) were properly addressed in the Draft and Final EIR prepared for the proposed project, and that
cumulative impacts are also adequately addressed in the Draft and Final EIR.
The following Findings are made with regard to the significant environmental effects identified in the
Draft and Final EIR prepared for the proposed project. These Findings are to serve as the legally
relevant conclusions which expose the City of Moorpark's mode of analysis of facts, regulations and
policies, and which bridge the gap between raw data and the ultimate land use decision in this case by
the City Council.
A. GEOTHCEMCAL RESOURCES
Significant Effect: The potential for liquefaction represents the only significant geohazard on the site.
Fin in • A potential for liquefaction exists on -site due to a rising groundwater table in combination
with the poorly consolidated alluvial deposits. This could lead to possible structural damage in the
event of a severe seismic event. Proper implementation of standard building and safety code
requirements and the required mitigation measures listed below will reduce the potential liquefaction
hazard to a level of insignificance.
Mitigation Measures:
1. The applicant shall conduct a detailed geotechnical engineering investigation to confirm and
evaluate the potential for liquefaction at the site. The investigation shall include subsurface borings to
depths of forty five to fifty feet with appropriate in -situ testing and sampling. Caisson or pile-
supported foundation systems, structural slabs, sub- drains, or dewatering systems have all been
successfully utilized on projects where liquefaction potentials are high.
2. The applicant shall conduct a detailed geotechnical engineering investigation to evaluate the
mechanical properties of the deposits underlying proposed buildings and attendant infrastructure. Such
an investigation shall include subsurface explorations to obtain representative in -situ and bulk soil
samples, appropriate laboratory testing, and an analysis of pertinent factors including removal and
recompaction of compressible soils, foundation design parameters, and the stability of graded slopes.
Rationale
These mitigation measures have been successfully utilized on numerous projects throughout Southem
California where liquefaction potentials are high. It is therefore reasonable to conclude that, with
proper implementation of these measures, the liquefaction hazard will be satisfactorally mitigated.
B. AIR QUALITY
Significant Effect: Implementation of the upper and lower commercial project component would
contribute to significant adverse long -term cumulative impacts to the local and regional air
environment, since the Air Pollution Control District (APCD) standards of 13.7 tons per year (tpy) for
Reactive Organic Compounds (ROC) and Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) would be exceeded. Net emissions
above the APCD threshold are 41.14 tpy for ROC and 32.14 tpy for NOx.
Finding* According to the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP), commercial projects are considered
consistent with the AQMP, if they are considered population dependent. This project component is
intended to serve the local population, and as such, is considered consistent with the AQMP. Yet, the
proposed commercial development will contribute to cumulatively significant effect on air quality, due
to the total amount of emissions that will be generated by vehicle traffic and added to Zhe local
airshed.
The following mitigation measures are identified in the Final EIR and would reduce the amount of air
emissions generated by the project. However, the measures would not reduce cumulative air quality
impacts to insignificant levels.
Mitigation M ,r s:
Short Term
3. A regular watering program shall be implemented to reduce fugitive dust. Twice during the
work day and at the end of the work day, graded portions of the project site shall be watered to create a
"crust' surface. This would reduce the amount of dust generated during non -work hours.
4. When appropriate, exposed surfaces shall be seeded with a fast growing, soil binding plant.
This would substantially reduce wind erosion and its contribution to local particulate levels.
5. All grading operations shall be subject to compliance with the Ventura County APCD dust
control measures as enforced by APCD inspectors.
6. All grading and construction equipment shall be kept on or near the site until those phases of
development are completed.
7. Site access roads shall be covered with gravel or paving.
8. During periods of high winds (30 mph or greater), grading operations shall be ceased.
9. All earth material being moved shall be securely covered.
10. Periodic application of water on material stockpiles shall be conducted.
11. On -site vehicular traffic shall be limited to no more than 15 mph.
12. Public streets in the vicinity of the site shall be periodically washed down with water.
Long Term
13. Transportation Management Plan - The applicant should prepare a Transportation
Management Plan (TMP) or similar plan that would reduce total employee commuter trips.
14. Provide On -site Transit Facilities - The applicant shall provide the following on the project
site: covered and lighted bus stops; bus turnouts; and safe pedestrian walkways between structures and
bus stops.
15. Banking Services - Bank - related services (Auto Teller Machine, Direct Deposit, Check
Cashing, etc.) can be provided on -site in order to reduce traffic trips.
16. Off -site Vehicular Traffic irculation Improvements - The applicant should contribute funds
toward the improvement of local vehicular traffic circulation improvements. Such improvements could
include improved signal sychronization and /or widening of intersections /roadways. This measure is
proposed in order to improve the flow of traffic in the City which would reduce congestion and the
emission of air pollutants.
17. Buy Downs - Estimated costs of 'buy downs" for the proposed project should be based on the net
estimated emissions associated with the proposed project. Net project emissions are estimated as
follows:
ROC NOx
Project emissions (tpy)
54.84 45.84
Less APCD Threshold
13.70 13.70
Net emissionsabove threshold
41.14 32.14
The "buy downs" fees are identified below and are applied to the net emissions associated with
this project component:
PUC NO>,
Transit Subsidy $ 3,840 /Ton $3,340 /Ton
Ride Sharing $ 3,706 /Ton $2,503 /Ton
Such "buy downs" fees provide an indirect means of reducing emissions by providing funding to
organizations that would benefit the regional and local air quality environment.
As calculated, "buy downs" fees applied to the project would total $354,343.68 which shall be paid as a
one -time contribution to the City's Traffic Management System Fund.
At the City Council's meeting of October 17,1990, the Council voted to require an additional $100,000 to
be paid to the City's Traffic Management Fund to further minimize air quality impacts.
Although the above measures will reduce air emissions associated with the project and would
contribute to regional air quality management programs, the projected emissions (as modelled in the
Draft EIR) resulting from cumulative development activities would still create a significant,
unadvoidable impact Due to these unavoidable and significant adverse impacts on air quality, a
Statement of Overriding Considerations must be adopted in association with any approval of the
project (See Statement of Overriding Considerations portion of Exhibit "A!').
C. NOISE
S_ignifi anf Fff +- The proposed project would generate noise levels in excess of the identified noise
standards in the Draft EIR (section 3) which would adversely impact surrounding land uses during the
short term construction phase as well as the long term operation phase. This project will also contribute
to cumulative traffic increases which would result in noise levels of 68 to 74 dB Leq along Los Angeles
Avenue, a street which is currently a source of significantly adverse noise levels.
Finding; The following mitigation measures are identified in the Final EIR and would control and limit
noise levels, to the extent feasible. "These measures, however, are not capable of reducing the
construction impacts or long term traffic noise impacts to insignificant levels. Due to these unavoidable,
significant adverse effects on the noise environment, a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be
adopted in association with any approval of the proN( •t (See Statement of Overriding Considerations
portion of Exhibit "A ").
Mitigation Measures:
SHORT TERM
18. Construction activities shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on
weekdays, between the hours of 9:00 am and 7 pm on Saturdays, and shall exclude Sundays.
19. During site preparation and construction, construction equipment shall be fitted with modern
sound - reduction equipment.
LONG TERM
20. The noise wall adjacent to Shop Numbers 1, 2 and 3 and Retail "A" shall be increased in height
to eight feet.
21. Noise attenuation walls to a height of eight feet shall be located around all loading areas.
22. Vehicle speed limits of 25 mph shall be posted along Liberty Bell Road and Lassen Avenue.
23. Use of parking lot vacuums and landscape maintenance equipment shall be limited to the hours
of 8 am. and 7 pm. weekdays.
No mitigation measures are known that would reduce the off -site impact magnitude of noise associated
with project - generated traffic.
Rationale
Due to these unavoidable significant adverse noise impacts, a Statement of Overriding Considerations
must be adopted in association with any approval of the project (See Statement of Overriding
Considerations portion of Exhibit "A").
D. FIRE PROTECTION
31gmtic nt Effect: The project would result in an incremental increase in the use of the City's fire
protection services. However, the project contains no element that poses any unique fire hazard and no
significant impact to fire supression services would result.
Finding: The proposed parcel map and commercial development is not expected to significantly impact
the provision of fire protection services to the site. Fire protection and emergency medical services are
currently provided to the site. Fire protection measures required by the County of Ventura Fire
Protection District would be addressed during final plan review subsequent to City approval. In
addition, many of the mitigation measures listed in the Police Protection section of these Findings
address concerns of the Fire Department.
Mitigation M a=r t: NONE.
EAdQaaic
Therefore, with proper implementation of fire protection measures and enforcement of district
requirements, any impacts will be reduced to a level of insignificance.
E. POLICE PROTECTION
Significant Effect: The project would result in an incremental increase in calls to the Ventura County
Sheriff's Department. However, the project contains no element that poses any unique hazard or risk
and no significant impact to police protection services would result.
Finding; The proposed parcel map and commercial development is not expected to significantly impact
the provision of police protection services to the site, even though development of the site will increase
the number of emergency calls received by the Police Department. Police protection is currently
provided to the site.
Mitigation Measures: Police protection measures required by the Ventura County Sheriffs Department
and Moorpark Police Department would be addressed during final plan review subsequent to City
approval.
24. A licensed security guard is required during the construction phase, or a 6 -foot high chain fence
shall be erected around the construction site.
25. Construction equipment, tools, etc., shall be properly secured during non - working hours.
26. All appliances (microwave ovens, dishwashers, trash compactors, etc.) shall be properly
secured prior to installation during non - working hours. All serial numbers shall be recorded for
identification purposes.
27. Lighting devices shall be high enough as to prohibit anyone on the ground from tampering with
them. All parking areas shall be provided with a lighting system capable of illuminating the parking
surface with a minimum maintained 1 -foot candle of light and shall be designed to minimize the
spillage of light onto adjacent properties. All exterior lighting devices shall be protected by weather
and breakage - resistant covers.
28. Landscaping shall not obstruct any exterior door or window.
29. Landscaping is to be maintained at a height where pedestrians will have full view of the area
with no obstructions.
30. Landscaping at entrances /exits or at any intersection within the parking lot shall not block or
screen views of a seated driver from another moving vehicle or pedestrian.
31. Landscaping (trees) shall not be placed directly, under any overhead lighting which could cause
a loss of light at ground level.
32. Addresses shall be clearly visible to approaching emergency vehicles and mounted against a
contrasting color.
33. Address numbers shall be, a minimum of six inches in height and illuminated during the hours of
darkness.
34. All exterior doors shall be constructed of solid wood core a minimum of I and 3/4 inches thick or
of metal construction. Front glass door(s) commonly used for entry are acceptable but should be visible to
the street.
35. Doors utilizing a cylinder lock shall have a minimum five pin tumbler operation with the
locking bar or bolt extending into the receiving guide a minimum of one inch.
36. There shall not be any easy exterior access to the roof area, i.e., ladders, trees, high walls, etc.
37. Upon occupancy by the owner or proprietor, each single unit in a tract or commercial
development constructed under the same general plan, shall have locks using combinations which are
interchange free from locks used in all other separate dwellings, proprietorships, or similar distinct
occupancies.
Therefore, with proper implementation of police protection measures and enforcement of department
requirements, any impacts will be reduced to a level of insignificance.
F. PARKS AND RECREATION
S19MU'Unt Ff f ,.t. The proposed proles does not include any residential uses. The proposed parcel map
and commercial development will not significantly impact the provision of parks and recreation
services to the site since no residential uses are proposed with the project.
Fin ' • The project would not increase local population levels and would not result in a significant
increase use of City park and recreation facilities. however, employees would be expected to use City
Parks and Recreation facilities and mitigation is required
Parks and Recreation impacts will be mitigated by the payment of a fee of $025
per square foot of commercial use, consistent with City, policy.
RadQnak
Therefore, with proper implementation of the mitigation measure, any impacts will be reduced to a
level of insignificance.
C. WATER PROVISIONS
Signifk Effect; No significant adverse impacts to water provision or area water supplies have
been identified.
FiUSUBga The Ventura Countv Waterworks District can provide the required water to the site,
utilizing the existing infrastructure.
Mitigation hJCA =r NONE.
Rationale
Therefore, with proper implementation of Ventura County Waterworks District standards and City
Engineering requirements, any impacts will be reduced to a level of insignificance.
H. SANITARY SEWERS
Significant Effect: For the lower commercial component and combined commercial components, the
impacts of the project to sanitary sewers have been identified as cumillatius significant and adverse,
but mitigated. The upper commercial component would not by itself have a significant effect.
Finding: The Ventura County Waterworks District No. 1 would not be significantly impacted by
wastewater flows generated by the proposed project at this time. However, due to area -wide growth,
limited available sewage treatment plant capacity is expected to exist when all proposed projects in
the City of Moorpark become operational (i.e. during the design year). At that time, the proposed
project would would overburden the existing Moorpark Wastewater Treatment Facility (the upper
commercial component would not have a significant effect). However, the City Engineer can oversee
the connection of the project into the sewer system to assure that sufficient capacity exists in the system
and treatment plant, prior to occupancy of the proposed project.
Mitigation M a ,r c: The following mitigation measures are designed to reduce the project impacts on
the sewage treatment and disposal infrastructure to a level of insignificance.
38. The project applicant shall be required to fund all sewer infrastructure improvements necessary
to accommodate the proposed project demand.
39. The applicant shall be required to comply with all pertinent County of Ventura Public Works
Department connection regulations. These mitigation measures shall be implemented by the County of
Ventura Public Works Department (Waterworks District No. 1).
Rationale
Therefore, with proper implementation of City Engineering standards and the mitigation measures, as
well as phasing of the proposed project to assure that the sewer system and treatment plant are not
overburdened, any impacts will be reduced to a level of insignificance.
I. STORM DRAINAGE
Significant Effect- No significant adverse impacts to storm drainage have been identified.
Finding: The proposed project would result in a minor increase in off -site runoff due to the increase in
impervious surface on the property. 1- lowever, the pi oposed parcel reap and commercial development is
not expected to significantly impact the storm drainog�, sy';tern nn or off the site since additional runoff
Created by this project can be conveyed to the proper drainage facility via the existing and proposed
storm drainage infrastructure and on -site retention basins
Mitigation Measures: The following mitigation measure is required in order to minimize any adverse
storm drainage impact:
40. On -site detention basins should be incorporated into the proposed site plan.
Therefore, with proper implementation of City Engineering standards and the mitigation measure, any
impacts will be reduced to a level of insignificance.
J• SOLID WASTE
Significant Effect No significant adverse impacts have been identified in relation to solid waste.
Funding., The proposed parcel map and commercial development is not expected to significantly impact
the collection and disposal of solid waste on or off the site. Solid waste would be generated by each
project component, transferred off -site by a licensed carrier and disposed of at an area landfill.
Additional demand created by this project can be served via the existing solid waste collection,
recycling and disposal system. The County of Ventura Solid Waste Management Department indicates
that recycling is the most effective means of mitigating impacts to solid waste management resources.
Mitigation M as res: The following mitigation measure is required in order to minimize any adverse
solid waste impact:
41. To encourage future residents and tenants of the proposed project to contribute materials for
recycling, design considerations shall be included in each development component that would provide
adequate space and facilities for the storage and transfer of recyclable materials.
Therefore, with proper implementation of City waste disposal standards and the mitigation measure,
any impacts will be reduced to a level of insignificance.
K. VISUAL RESOURCESILIGHT AND GLARFJARCHITECTURAL
Significant Effect: Significant adverse impacts have been identified in relation to aesthetics, but the
impacts are mitigablc:.
Finding: Since the project site is currently undeveloped, the proposed commercial development is
expected to create significant sources of light and ;fare, new disruptions to existing viewsheds and
introduce new architecture to the city of Moorpark I'he site would be transformed from a natural to a
man -made environment. The project would be most visible from Los Angele=s Avenue but would also be
visible from the existing residential area located to the west and the existing school to the northeast.
Mitigation Measures: The fallowing mitigation measure are intended to reduce any significant,
adverse impacts of views, light and glare and architecture to a level of insignificance:
42. Plant a sufficient amount of tall growing trees and /or shrubs along the western site boundary
(abutting the wall) to minimize the glare impacts and the loss of privacy of the nearby single- family
neighborhood.
43. No illuminated building mounted signs shall be permitted on any building facade facing
towards a residential neighborhood.
44. All parking lot pole lights and street lights shall be fully hooded and back shielded to reduce
the light "spillage" and glare.
45. Trees and shrubs planted along the western site perimeter shall be a minimum 24 inch box size
in order to provide a screening effect in a short time period.
46. Colors and materials of the proposed building shall be compatible with the surrounding area.
47. Tinted windows shall be installed to minimize the emittance of light and glare from interior
sources.
48. Prior to approval of a zoning clearance, the applicant shall have a tree report prepared
consistent with City code requirements. Landscaping shall be provided for the commercial
development which is equivalent to the value of the 310 trees which will be removed.
Rationale
Therefore, with proper implementation of the mitigation measure, in particular, landscaping, lighting
and architectual design, any impacts will be reduced to a level of insignificance.
L. TRAFFIC/CIRCULATION MITIGATION MEASURES
On October 17, 1990, the City Council approved changes to the City Engineer's conditions for
transportation improvements for this project. The mitigation measures included in this section of the
findings reflect these changes.
Significant ff ct: Implementation of the lower commercial project component would result in a
cumulatively significant unavoidably adverse long -term impact to the traffic volumes on Los Angeles
Avenue.
fin&UII ,. Given that this project would result in or contribute to cumulative traffic volumes at
intersections along Los Angeles Avenue that currentiv exceed City standards for level of service, this
project's impact on the City's traffic environment r, considered unavoidably significant. The most
significant impact of the project is the addition i,l vehicle trips on the existing overburdened
intersections on Los Angeles Avenue, in the vicinity of the project site. Mitigation measures have been
imposed by the City Council to reduce the adverse, significant and unmitigable impacts of project
r,. sated traffic below a level of significance. However, these measures are not capable of reducing the
:emulative impacts of all development activities along Los Angeles Avenue to insignificant levels. No
mitigation measures are known that would reduce long -term cumulative off -site impacts associated
with project - generated traffic to a level of insignificance.
Mitigation Measures: Mitigation measures have been imposed by the City Council to reduce the
adverse, significant and unmitigable impacts of project related traffic below a level of significance.
The following mitigation measures are offered as part of this EIR; however, these measures are not
capable of reducing the cumulative impacts of all development activities along Los Anegeles Avenue to
insignificant levels.
The applicant shall submit tU the City for review and approval.,
��• street iMpruvement plaits irr °et,,are�1 br s registe1, 6 civil enr ineer
small eater r €rto an d i °Leair riL with the City to complete the
iciiprcveirEenis; atr;.l dial) post sufficient surety guaranteeing the
currstructiurr of tire Improvements. Any necessary right -of -way
acquisition rrecessury to cul„r.,cLu Lhe rcq,tireu improvements will be
acquired by ti,e applicant at their expense.
The improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk,
street lights, traffic signals, striping and signing, traffic
control, paving, and any necessary transitions to the satisfaction
Of the City Engineer. The appli` able Ventura County Road Standard
Plates are as follows:
a. Los Angeles Avenue per Plate B -2A, modified north of
centerline to have 59 feet of right -of -way, 51 foot pavement
width, a 6 foot landscaped area and a 6 foot sidewalk. The
landscaped area and sidewalk shall be located within the 8
foot parkway area and a 4 foot landscape and pedestrian
easement. Applicant shall construct improvements north of the
centerline across the frontage of the project.
Applicant shall also construct sufficient roadway widening
along tiie south side to permit restriping for a westbound
auxiliary lane across the entire frontage of the project, as
well as a 12 foot wide eastbound right turn pocket providing
a minimum of 150 feet of storage at Liberty Bell Road. All
Los Angeles Avenue improvements shall be shown first on
Preliminary plans which shall be submitted to tine City for
review and approval, after which they will be submitted to
Caltrans for review and approval. Los Angeles Avenue scope of
improvements shall be returned to City Council for
consideration of alternative improvements, if Caltrans will
not approve the preliminar,.y plans.
The applicant shall make an irrevocable offer of dedication of
an additional 9 feet across tite frontage of the project. The
City "ray, in the futu e, elect to accept this dedication to
provide for construction of additional improvements.
The applicant shall design the main driveway project entrance
between Park Lane and Liberty Bell Road to provide two inbound
lanes and one outbound l The required Los Angeles Avenue
improvements shall illC kdt: restriping to provide a striped
island in the vicinity of this driveway, thereby prohibiting
left turns in or out of tare driveway.
in conjunction with other ios Angeles Avenue improvements, all
necessary transitions shad be designed and constructed to the
satisfaction of tine City tngiiieer and Caltrans. Any
improvements constructed i,y t11 City with Los Angeles Avenue
Area of Contribution e f,��rds lit L would normally be tiie
responsibility of the app rant :hall be offset by special
applicant contributions tiro I_,, Angeles Avenue Area of
Contribution fund.
Liberty Bell Road shall be ,designed and constructed to align
with the ultimate Liberty Beii Nuad alignment south of Los
Angeles Avenue. The " "rty Beii Road - Los Angeles Avenue
intersection must be designeu and constructed to provide for
necessary turning pockets and must be reviewed and approved by
the City Engineer prior tJ recordation so that the dedication
of eight -of -way on the MdP will be the ultimate right -of -way
dedication. Liberty ball Road will be a variable width
street, with all elements designed to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer. A conceptual configuration of the proposed
improvements is shown in the attached figure 1. Although it
is intended that the concept shown on this figure be
implemented, it is understood that final plan details such as
transition design may vary from that shown in the figure.
Landscape &
P &d striae b-
:
Ea SclltclIt
Tr,ir��� fat of
;'cjlo�lS
r
r
Second Set of',
Driva17ays 4 s 5
B/L
:
First Sat of;
Driveways
TAS S EIS
8 �rL
5 12
VENUE
1.2 12
41'
i2 12 8
I
I I i
12 12 12 ]2 5
I 6/L
r
5�,'
12 12 12 1.2 12 5
I R
\4k
LOS .ANGELES AVENUE
4:
,
:4
8
Easement
i
6' Landscaped
,
Parkway &
f---
6' Sidewalk
,
:
11180' Transition
;
TAS S EIS
8 �rL
5 12
VENUE
1.2 12
41'
i2 12 8
I
I I i
12 12 12 ]2 5
I 6/L
r
5�,'
12 12 12 1.2 12 5
I R
\4k
LOS .ANGELES AVENUE
4:
Landscape &
Pedestrian
Easement
i
6' Landscaped
Parkway &
f---
6' Sidewalk
:
11180' Transition
;
8
:
,
4�
,
,
,
,
:
,
:
k / Val
8
:
:
:
:
4'
,
,
:
FI`URE 1
' LIBERTY BELL ROAD
C . Lassen Avenue per Plate 6-5A, modified to have 56 feet of
rigtst -of -way to match the existing, previously dedicated,
aii�3nment per Parcel Map flu. 3781 on the easterly portion of
the project site. Lassen Avenue shall have a 6 foot sidewalk
and 4 fuot landscaped -lea on the south side, within the 8
Not, parkway area and a 2 foot landscape and pedestrian
easement. All improvements south of centerline plus 12 feet
north of centerline shall be constructed. In addition, all
necessary transitions shall be constructed to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer. Tiie only connection of Lassen Avenue to
Sierra Avenue shall be in the form of an unpaved emergency
access easement area west of t.iberty Bell Road. This easement
shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, the
Director of Community Development, the Sheriff's Department
and the fire Department. The connection of Lassen Avenue to
Liberty Bell Avenue shall be in the form of a knuckle per City
standard.
d Although not a requirement of this development, it is noted
for future reference that any future street intersecting
Lassen Avenue in the vicinity of the traffic circle servicing
the proposed office buildings east of Liberty Bell Road shall
not be offset from the traffic circle.
e. Park Lane per Plate B -31), modified west of centerline to have
28 foot right -of -way, 20 foot pavement width, 6 foot
landscaped area and 6 foot sidewalk within the 8 foot parkway
area and a 4 foot landscape and pedestrian easement; with the
portion of Park Lane located within 150 feet north of the
prolongation of the northern right -of -way of Los Angeles
Avenue designed and constructed in accordance -with Plate B -3D,
modified to have 65 foot right -of -way width, 49 foot pavement
width, 6 foot landscaped area and 6 foot sidewalk within the
8 foot parkway area and a 4 foot pedestrian easement. All
necessary transitions shall be designed and constructed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. The anticipated lane
configuration on Park lane at the Los Angeles Avenue
intersection includes one southbound right turn lane, one
southbound through lane, one southbound left turn lane, and
one northbound through lane. To the greatest extent
practicable, Park Lane improvements north of Los Angeles
Avenue shall align with ultimate improvements south of Los
Angeles Avenue. Design of the Park lane - Los Angeles Avenue
intersection must be fcvIewed and approved by the City
Engineer prior to recordation so that the dedication of right -
u way on the map wi i be the ultimate tight -of -way
dedication.
f• ito portion of any project driveway may be within 150 feet of
the flledresI curb pro lony,Iiori of in adjacent intersection.
4 The applicant shall construct the necessary improvements to
provide Cl jss II bicycI la►ies (5 feet wide) alony t iuerty
Bell "ad per tile Ci1_CU1,AlUfl HLL,Unt of the Huorpark 6,11cral
Plan.
SO The applicant shall execute a covenant running with the land on
behalf of itself and its successors, lit! irs, and assigns agreeing to
participate in the formatlun of all assessment district or other
financing technique including, but not limited to, the payment of
traffic mitigation fees, whirl► the City may implement or adopt, and
public street and traffic improvements directly or indirectly
affected by the development.
51 The applicant shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion
Of all improvements which revert to the City
parks, fencing, etc.) or- which require removal (i.e.�, modelchomes,
temporary debris basins, ett..j.
S2. Applicant shall post sufficient surety for the installation of a
traffic signal at the intersection of Los Angeles Avenue - Liberty
Bell Road. The applicant may be entitled to receive reimbursement
from the Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution of up to $65,000 or
50 percent of the construction expenses, whichever is less.
�)3• The applicant shall post sufficient surety for the installation of
a traffic signal at the int#.,rsection of Los Angeles Avenue - Park
Lane.
The applicant shall make a special contribution to the City
representing the applicant's prorata share of the costs of
improvements to the following intersections:
a Poindexter Avenue - Moorpark Avenue
a Los Angeles Avenue - Gabbert Road
M Los Angeles Avenue - Moorpark Avenue
4 Spring Road - New tos Angeles Avenue
To determine the costs of these improvements, the applicant shall
first prepare conceptual plans to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer. file prorata share shall be developed based on the
incremental traffic addt'li by the project, and shall be approved by
l
the City Council prior u zoniny clearance. The contribution shall
then be paid to City, prior to zoning clearance.
TO OCCIVAIKA,w T1tF ft)1 l oWit10 ( c;lMl i IOtIS SHAI L BL JA 1 SF 1 U:
55. The Los Angeles Avenue - Liberty Bell Avenue traffic signal shall be
operational prior to any occupancy
for this project.
j,V(, The Los Angeles Avenue - Park
lane traffic signal shall be
constructed by the apps icant priur
to the occupancy of the 160,000th
"Iuare foot and shall be uperational if approved by Caltrans. if
construction of this signal is nut
allo►red by Caltrans at the time
of the applicant's request for
occupancy, the applicant shall
deposit 125% of the total estimated
construct jon cost with the City.
The required bond for this signal
can be exonerated if the cash
deposit is provided to the City.
this construction cost shall
illciWde associatEd engineeri,rg,
cunstruction inspection and
administration costs. fhis caAi
deposit does not relieve the
applicant from constructing this
sj9uaI. The applicant shall
construct the signal upon receiving Caltrans permission to do so.
7. All street and storm drain improvements shall be constructed prior
to first occupancy. if right -of -Tray acquisition or Caltrans
permission tail not be obtained, the applicant can request
construction deferment on those portions of construction from the
City Council.
PRiOR TO ACCEPTAiIC.E OF PUBLIC 111PROVEI-MITS AND BOND EX011ERATIOH, THE FOLLOWING
(t► {tllll MIS SHALL BE SATISFIED:
52. Sufficient surety guaranteeing the public improvements shall be
provided. The surety shall remain in place for one year following
acceptance by the City Council.
HatiQnak
Therefure, the proposed parcel map and commercial development will have a significant effect on
traffic, even after mitigation measures are implemented. mitigation measures are not capable of
reducing the impacts to a level of insignificance. A Statement of Overriding Considerations must be
adopted in association with any approval of the project (See Statement of Overriding Considerations
portion of Exhibit "A ").
M- POPULATION/HOUSING
Significant Effect- No significant adverse impacts to population and housing have been identified.
Fin in The pooposed project does not include any residential uses but could have an indirect impact
on the housing environment due to additional housing required by those new employees expected to be
new residents of the city. However, most employees should be existing residents of Moorpark.
Mitigation Measures: NONE.
Rationale
Therefore, given the low impact of the project on population and housing, any impacts will be below a
level of significance.
N. HEALTH HAZARDS
Significant Eff rt- No significant adverse health hazards have been identified.
Fin in • There is the potential for unsafe operation of the gas station and restaurants. However,
County, State andFederal environmental protection laws and standards will preclude the creation of
any unhealthful situations. The proposed parcel map and commercial development is not expected to
create any significant health hazards on or off site.
MI
Rationale
Therefore, given the County, State and Federal environmental protection laws and standards which
will preclude the creation of any unhealthful situations, any impacts will be reduced to a level of
insignificance.
ALTERNATIVES
Four alternatives to the proposed project were discussed in the Draft EIR (section 7). None of the four
alternatives were choosen by the City Council since the alternatives do not achieve the city of
Moorpark's goals for general plan consistency, commercial service provision and efficient traffic
circulation for the residents of Moorpark.
EXHIBIT A (CONTINUED)
STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR)
FOR MISSION BELL PLAZA
(UPPER AND LOWER COMMERCIAL COMPONENT)
NOVEMBER 7,1990
Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 of the Public
Resources Code of the State of California, Section 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines), the City Council of
the City of Moorpark determines that the environmental issues, effects and mitigation of the proposed
project are similar to those addressed in the Draft and Final EIR prepared for the proposed project and
that cumulative impacts are adequately addressed in the Draft and Final EIR.
The City Council has determined that, due to the information provided in the Draft and Final EIR,
City Council Staff Reports and public testimony; 1) some significant environmental impacts listed in
the Draft EIR are not mitigable to a level of insignificance (air quality, noise and traffic), 2) all
suggested alternative projects within the Draft EIR are not feasible (See Findings in Exhibit A above).
Therefore, Statements of Overriding Consideration in relation to the Upper and Lower Commercial
component of Mission Bell Plaza are presented below. From this, it is determined that the benefits of
the proposed project to the State of California, County of Ventura and the City of Moorpark outweigh
the unavoidable adverse environmental effects of air quality, noise and traffic.
Statement of Overriding Consideratio*+c•
- The project is consistent with the city's General Plan for land use and provision of commercial
services for the local population.
- Since the project site has never been developed, no air pollutants are currently generated by its
use. The proposed project will add 198,792 square feet of neighborhood retail commercial to the city of
Moorpark. Once the retail commercial project is in operation, the amount of air pollutants will increase
on -site and in the general area. Currently, many Moorpark residents travel out of the city limits of
Moorpark for neighborhood retail shopping purposes. The proposed neighborhood retail commercial
center will result in a reduction in vehicle miles travelled VMT by Moorpark residents since Moorpark
residents will travel a shorter distance to the propose ci neighborhood commercial facilities (once the
commercial center is in operation). Therefore, the totai amount of air pollutants within the sub -
regional airshed will be decreased since total vehicle miles travelled (VMT) will decrease.
- Operation of this neigWrhood retail ,•ornmercial center will result in increased revenue to
the local general tax base due to increased market k_, , ture or resident's disposable income.
- Developer- funded improvements to Los Angeles Avenue (to be completed prior to occupancy by
mants of the project), such as road widening, turn lanes and traffic signalization, will benefit residents
of Ventura County as well as the city of Moorpark due to improved traffic flow and safety.
EXHIBIT B
MITIGATION MEASURES AND REPORTING AND MONITORING PROGRAM
MISSION BELL PLAZA
UPPER AND LOWER COMMERCIAL COMPONENTS
NOVEMBER 7, 1990
Prior to complying with each of the following mitigation measures, there is a review by the City of
Moorpark. The mitigation reporting and monitoring program provides the City with the review
opportunity to ensure that mitigation measures have been considered and incorporated into the project
implementation.
The following guidelines should be followed by the City departments /divisions /consultants to ensure
compliance at each step of the process. Explanation is provided within the body of the Monitoring
Program in bold type, following each mitigation measure. The attached EIR Mitigation Reporting and
Monitoring Checklist will be used by all City departments /divisions /consultants involved in the
project implementation process in order to track the project's mitigation measure compliance progress.
A table has been included at the end of the mitigation measures and mitigation reporting and
monitoring program. This table is provided in order for City Staff to easily review each mitigation
measure in relation to, 1) the agent responsible for it's implementation and, 2) the timing of
implementation. Please note that these mitigation measures and the mitigation reporting and
monitoring program apply to both the upper and lower commercial component of Mission Bell Plaza. An
example of the City's standard Mitigation Reporting; and Monitoring Checklist is also provided,
following this table.
The mitigation measures and mitigation reporting and monitoring program should be included with the
construction bid package supplied by the applicant, when construction bids are solicited.
A. GEOTECHNICAL MITIGATION MEASURES
1, Miti_gation: The applicant shall conduct a detailed
geotechw,ai engineering investigation to confirm and
evaluat, he potential for liquefaction at the site. The
investigation shall include subsurface borings to depths of
forty five to fifty feet with appropriate in -situ testing and
sampling, Caisson or pile- supported foundation systems,
structural slabs, sub-drains, or dewatering systems have all
been successfully utilized on projects where liquefaction
potewi = are high.
Reporting and Monitoring: Prior to issuance of zoning
clearance, the applicant shall submit the detailed
geotechnical engineering investigation concurrent with the
grading and drainage plan for the entire project site. The
City Engineer and Building and Safety Official (or an
independent geotechnical consultant) shall approve this
investigation prior to any grading on the project site. Once
approval of this investigation is granted, notify the
Community Development Department so it can be noted in
the project file.
The geotechnical engineer
who prepared the geotechnical investigation shall.%"
inspect construction progress for compliance with the
recommendations of the geotechnical investigation. 4"
City P'
2. 1\aiti anon: The applicant shall conduct a detailed
geotechnical engineering investigation to evaluate the
mechanical properties of the deposits underlying proposed
buildings and attendant infrastructure. Such an
investigation shall include subsurface explorations to
obtain representative in -situ and bulk soil samples,
appropriate laboratory testing, and an analysis of
pertinent factors including removal and recompaction of
compressible roils, toundation design parameters, and the
stability , gr, ded slopes.
R=Dxling and Monitoring: Prior to issuance of zoning
clearance, the applicant shall submit the detailed
2-
geotechnical engineering investigation concurrent with the
grading and drainage plan for the entire project site. The
City Engineer and Building and Safety Official (or an
independent geotechnical consultant) shall approve this
investigation prior to any grading on the project site. Once
approval of this investigation is granted, notify the
Community Development Department so it can be noted in
the project file. Pwing grading and ppejeell eanstmetieff,
The geotechnical engineer
who prepared the geotechnical investigation shall alto.
inspect construction progress for compliance with the
recommendations of the geotechnical investigation. 44441-
.C; 93. F*+ninnar
B. AIR QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURES
Short -term
3. Mitigation: A regular watering program shall be
implemented to reduce fugitive dust. Twice during the work
day and at the end of the work day, graded portions of the
project site shall be watered to create a "crust" surface.
This would reduce the amount of dust generated during non -
work hours
Reporting and Monitorin • During construction, the City
Engineer and the on -site building superintendent shall be
responsible for enforcement of this mitigation measure as
stated.
4. Miti�atiorz: When appropriate, exposed surfaces shall be
secdc,d with a fast growing, soil binding plant. This would
2 -3
substawially r('dU, e wind erosion and its contribution to
local particulate levels.
Reporting and Monitoring- Prior to issuance of zone
clearance, the applicant shall submit a landscape and
irrigation plan prepared by a Landscape Architect
(licensed in the state of California). This plan shall
include a temporary erosion control seed mix. The
landscape plan shall be approved by the Community
Development Director prior to issuance of a grading permit.
The City Engineer and the on -site building superintendent
during construction shall be responsible for enforcement of
this mitigation measure as stated.
5. Mitigation: All grading operations shall be subject to
compliance with the Ventura County APCD dust control
measures as enforced by APCD inspectors.
Reporting and Monitoring; During the construction phase of
the project, City Engineer, Building Inspector, the on -site
construction superintendent and the APCD shall enforce all
dust control measures. The on -site construction
superintendent shall have a copy of the dust control
measures on -site at all times.
6. Mitigation: All grading and construction equipment shall
be kept on or near the site until those phases of
development are completed.
Reporting and Monitoring: The City Engineer and the on-
site construction superintendent shall enforce the parking
location of construction- related vehicles at all times during
the construction phase.
7. Mitigation.: Site access roads shall be covered with gravel
or pavin,
2 -+
Reporting and Monitoring- Prior to issuance of zoning
clearance, a grading plan and drainage plan shall be
submitted and approved by the City Engineer. This plan
shall include a statement in the general notes which
requires that site access roads shall be covered with gravel
or paving as well as labelling the roads to be gravelled or
paved. During construction, the City Engineer shall enforce
compliance with the mitigation measure.
8. Mitigation: During periods of high winds (30 mph or
greater), grading operations shall be ceased.
Reporfing 2nd Monitoring: During the construction phase of
the project, City Engineer, the on -site construction
superintendent and the APCD shall enforce all dust control
measures. The on -site construction superintendent shall
have a copy of the dust control measures on -site at all
times.
9. Mitigation: All earth material being moved shall be
securely covered.
Reporting and Monitoring: During the construction phase of
the project, the City Engineer, the on -site construction
superintendent and the APCD shall enforce all dust control
measures. The on -site construction superintendent shall
have a copy of the Ventura County APCD dust control
measures on -site at all times.
10. Mitigation: Periodic application of water on material
stockpiles shall be conducted.
Reporting an Monitoring • During the construction phase of
the project, the City Engineer, the on -site construction
superintendent and the APCD shall enforce all dust control
measures The on -site construction superintendent shall
Z -5
Long -Term
have a copy of the State of California and Ventura County
APCD dust control measures on -site at all times.
11. Mitigation: On -site vehicular traffic shall be limited to no
more than 15 mph.
Reporting and Mo ito ing. The City Engineer and the on-
site construction superintendent shall enforce the on -site
vehicle speed of construction- related vehicles at all times
during the construction phase.
12. Mitigation: Public streets in the vicinity of the site shall
be periodically washed down with water.
Reporting and Monitoring. During the construction phase of
the project, the City Engineer and the on -site construction
superintendent shall enforce this mitigation measure at all
times.
13. Miti ation: Transportation Management Plan - The
applicant should prepare a Transportation Management
Plan (TMP) or similar plan that would reduce total
employee Commuter trips.
Reporting annd Monitoring; Prior to issuance of occupancy,
the applicant shall submit a Transportation Management
Plan (TMP) to the Community Development Department.
The TMP shall include only those employers on -site with
50 or more employees. This TMP shall be approved by the
City Engineer and Director of Community Development
prior to issuance of occupancy of the main anchor tenants.
This 'UM1' ;hall be updated annually and submitted for
review and approval to the Community Development
Department. The shopping center property management
2,
company may act as the on -site TMP coordinator for the
large tenants.
14. Mitigation: Provide On -site Transit Facilities - The
applicant shall provide the following on the project site:
covered and lighted bus stops; bus turnouts; and safe
pedestrian walkways between structures and bus stops.
Reporting and Monito 'nom Prior to zoning clearance, the
applicant shall submit a Plan showing the design and
locations of covered and lighted bus stops, bus turnouts, and
safe pedestrian walkways between structures and bus stops.
This plan shall be approved by the Director of Community
Development prior to zoning clearance approval.
15. Mitigation: Banking Services - Bank - related services
(Auto Teller Machine, Direct Deposit, Check Cashing, etc.)
can be provided on -site in order to reduce traffic trips.
ReAorting and Monitoring- Prior to occupancy approval for
the market, an Automated Teller Machine must be
installed inside the facility. This mitigation measure will
be enforced by the Community Development Department
16. Mitigation: Off -site Vehicular Traffic Circulation
Improvements - The applicant should contribute funds
toward the improvement of local vehicular traffic
circulation improvements. Such improvements could
include improved signal sychronization and /or widening of
intersections/ roadways, This measure is proposed in order
to improve the Flow of traffic in the City which would
reduce congeshon and the emission of air pollutants.
$eRMingAnd lonitoring: Prior to issuance of occupancy for
any tenants, the applicant shall contribute "Area of
Contribution" funds as directed by the City Engineer.
M
17. t T :-miti �tion: '3u
.� :_Downs - Estimated costs of "buy downs" for the
proposed project should be based on the net estimated emissions
associated with the proposed project.
As calculated, "buy down" fees applied to the project total
$354,343.68 which shall be paid as a one -time contribution to
the City's Traffic Management Fund.
Repo ng and Monito 'n Prior to zoning clearance, the
applicant shall deposit these funds with the City.
2-8
C NOISE MITIGATION MEASURES
SHORT TERM 18. Mitigation: Construction activities shall be limited to
between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekdays,
between 9:00 am and 7:00 pm on Saturdays and shall
exclude Sundays.
During the construction phase of
the project, the City Engineer and the on -site construction
superintendent shall enforce this mitigation measure at all
times.
19. Mitigation: During site preparation and construction,
construction equipment shall be fitted with modern sound -
reduction equipment.
During the construction phase of
the project, the City Engineer and the on -site construction
superintendent shall enforce this mitigation measure at all
times.
LONG TERM No mitigation measures are known that would reduce the off -
site impact mag- :itude of noise associated with project -
generated traffic. However, the following measures are
provided that would reduce specific noise events.
20. Mitigation: The noise wall adjacent to Shop Numbers 1, 2
and 3 and Retail "A" shall be increased in height to eight
feet.
Reporting and Monitorin Prior to construction of Shop
Nos. 1,2,,3 and Retail "A "(as shown on the site plan), the
adjacent noise wall shall be constructed to a height of 8
feet. The City Engineer shall verify this prior to
construction of this portion of the retail commercial center.
21. Mitigation_: Noise attenuation walls to a height of eight
feet shall Ile: located around all loading; areas.
2-9
Repo ing an d Monitorin &: The Community Development
Department will ensure that this condition has been
complied with prior to approval of occupancy for any
business with a loading area.
22. Mitigation: Vehicle speed limits of 25 mph shall be posted
along Liberty Bell and Lassen Avenue.
&PVIIiUg and Monitorin Prior to issuance of occupancy
for any tenants, these signs shall be posted to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer, with all costs incurred by
the applicant. Enforcement of the posted speed limit shall
be the responsibility of the Moorpark Police Department
23. Mitigation: Use of parking lot vacuums and landscape
maintenance equipment shall be limited to the hours of 8
a.m. end 7 p.m. weekdays.
Reporting and Monitoring Enforcement of this mitigation
measure shall be the responsibility of the shopping center
property management company and the City Code
Enforcement Officers„
24. Mitigation: Construction activities shall be limited to
between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekdays,
between 0:00 am and 7:00 pm on Saturdays and shall
exclude `7undays.
• During the construction phase of
the project, the City Engineer and the on -site construction
superintendent shall enforce this mitigation measure at all
times.
No mitigation measures are known that would reduce the off -
site impact magnitude of noise associated with project -
generated to l is
2 -l�
D. FIRE P?zarEcTION MITICA'l-TON MEASURES
NONE
E. POLICE PROTECTION MITIGATION MEASURES
25. MitiUa 'on: A licensed security guard is required during the
construction phase, or a 6-foot high chain fence shall be
erected around the construction site.
Reporting and Monitorin& Prior to beginning of construction,
the City Engineer shall ensure this mitigation measure is
completed. This mitigation measure shall be placed in the
General Notes of the Final Construction Plans.
26. Mitigation: Construction equipment, tools, etc., shall be
properly secured during non - working hours.
Repo g and Monitn '++o• During the construction phase of
the project, the City Engineer and the on -site construction
superintendent shall enforce this mitigation measure at all
times.
27. Mitigation• All appliances (microwave ovens,
dishwashers, trash compactors, etc.) shall be properly
secured prior to installation during non - working hours. All
serial numbers shall be recorded for identification purposes.
Ding the construction phase of
the project, city inspectors and the on -site construction
superintendent shall enforce this mitigation measure during
construction.
28. MMitie;::tio _,_ Lighting devices shall be high enough as to
prohibit anyone on the ground from tampering with them.
All parkink; areas sh,ail be provided with a lighting system
capable w illuminating the parking surface with a
minitrium maintained 1 -foot candle of light and shall be
ll
designe u to minimize the spillage of light onto adjacent
properties. All extenor lighting devices shall be protected
by weather and breakage- resistant covers.
Reporting and Monitorine: Prior to zoning clearance, a
Lighting Plan shall be submitted with the Final
Construction Drawings and approved by the Director of
Community Development. The Lighting Plan shall be
prepared by an electrical engineer licensed to work in the
state of t_'alifornia.
29. Mitigation: Landscaping shall not obstruct any exterior
door or window.
Reporting, and Monitori= Prior to zoning clearance, the
applicant shall submit a Landscape and Irrigation Plan for
review and approval by the Community Development
Department. The Landscape and Irrigation Plan should
note this concern in the General Notes and consider this
when determining the plant selection.
30. Mitigation: Landscaping is to be maintained at a height
where pedestrians will have full view of the area with no
obstructions.
Reporting and Monitoring: Prior to zoning clearance, the
applicant shall submit a Landscape and Irrigation Plan for
review and approval by the Community Development
Department. The Landscape and Irrigation Plan should
note this concern in the General Notes and consider this
when determining the plant selection.
31. Mitigation: landscaping at entrances /exits or at any
intersectson within the parking lot shall not block or screen
views of ,i seated driver from another moving vehicle or
pedcstri
2 -12
Reporting and Monitoring: Prior to zoning clearance, the
applicant shall submit a Landscape and Irrigation Plan for
review and approval by the Community Development
Department. The Landscape and Irrigation Plan should
note this concern in the General Notes and consider this
when determining the plant selection.
32. Mitigation: Landscaping (trees) shall not be placed
directly under any overhead lighting which could cause a
loss of light at ground level.
Reporting and Monitoring: Prior to zoning clearance, the
applicant shall submit a Landscape and Irrigation Plan for
review and approval by the Community Development
Department. The Landscape and Irrigation Plan should
note this concern in the General Notes and consider this
when determining the plant selection.
33. Mitigation: Addresses shall be clearly visible to
approaching emergency vehicles and mounted against a
contrasting color.
Reporting and Monitoring; Prior to zoning clearance, a Sign
Plan shall be submitted with the Final Construction Plans.
The Sign Plan shall include a detail of the proposed style
of addressing. Prior to issuance of occupancy, the size,
location and appearance of all addresses shall be
approved by the City Building Official, the Police
Department and the Fire Department.
34. Mitigation: Address numbers shall be a minimum of six
irac} cis height and illuminated during the hours of
dark.nes
Reporting and Monitoring; Prior to zoning clearance, a Sign
Plan shall be submitted with the Final Construction Plans.
The Sigri Plan shall include a detail of the proposed style
of addressing. Prior to issuance of occupancy, the size,
location and appearance of all addresses shall be
approved by the City Building Official, the Police
Department and the Fire Department.
35. Mitigation: All exterior doors shall be constructed of solid
wood core a minimum of 1 and 3/4 inches thick or of metal
construction Front glass door(s) commonly used for entry are
acceptable but should be visible to the street.
Reporting and Monitoring Prior to issuance of occupancy,
these improvements shall be approved by the City
Building Official, the Police Department and the Fire
Department.
36. Mitigation: Doors utilizing a cylinder lock shall have a
minimum five pin tumbler operation with the locking bar or
bolt extending into the receiving guide a minimum of one
inch.
Reporting and Monitoring; Prior to issuance of occupancy,
these improvements shall be approved by the City
Building Official, the Police Department and the Fire
Department.
37. Mitigation_ There shall not be any easy exterior access to
the roof area, i.e., ladders, trees, high walls, etc.
Reporting and Monitoring; Prior to issuance of occupancy,
these concerns shall be addressed by the City Building
Official, the Police Department and the Fire Department.
38. Mitigatiuw,_ upon occupancy by the owner or proprietor,
each single unit in a tract or commercial development
constructoti under the same general plan, shall have locks
using combinations .vhich are interchange free from locks
2 lt
used it :it] other separate dwellings, proprietorships, or
similar distinct occupancies.
Reporting and Monitoring; Prior to issuance of occupancy,
these improvements shall be approved by the City
Building Official, the Police Department and the Fire
Department.
F. PARKS AND RECREATION MITIGATION MEASURES
39. Mitigation: Fees for the upper and lower commercial
project component shall be assessed per City policy as
defined below:
$0.25 per square foot of commercial use
Reporting and Monito 'ng; Prior to issuance of occupancy, this
fee shall be deposited with the City of Moorpark and
documented by the Community Development Department.
C• WATER PROVISIONS MITIGATION MEASURES
NONE
H. SANITARY SEWERS MITIGATION MEASURES
40. Mitigation: The project applicant shall be required to fund
all sewer infrastructure improvements necessary to
accommodate the proposed project demand.
Reporting and Monitoring; --Prior to zoning clearance, the
applicant shall submit for review and approval public
improvement plans and Final Construction Plans for review
and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to acceptance of
public improvements and bond exoneration, the applicant
shall contribute funds as directed by the City Engineer
and/or construct all public improvements as shown on the
2-1-
improvement plans to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer_
41. Mitigation: The applicant shall be required to comply
with all pertinent County of Ventura Public Works
Department connection regulations. These mitigation
measures shall be implemented by the County of Ventura
Public Works Department (Waterworks District No. 1).
Reporting and Monitoring• Prior to zoning clearance, the
applicant shall submit for review and approval public
improvement plans and Final Construction Plans for review
and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to acceptance of
public improvements and bond exoneration, the applicant
shall construct all public improvements as shown on the
improvement plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer
and the County of Ventura Public Works Department
(Waterworks district No. 1).
L STORM DRAINAGE MITIGATION MEASURES
42. Mitigation: On -site detention basins should be
incorporated into the proposed site plan.
Reporting and Monitoring, Prior to zoning clearance, the
applicant shall submit grading and drainage plans (which
include provisions for on -site detention basins in the parking lot
landscaped areas) for approval by the City Engineer. Prior to
acceptance of public improvements and bond exoneration, the
applicant shall construct all public improvements as shown on
the improvement plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer
and the City's Landscape Architect. Any on -site detention
areas within proposed landscaped areas shall be shown on the
required landscape and irrigation plan.
2 -11
J. SOLID WASTE MITIGATION MEASURES
43. Mitigation: To encourage future residents and tenants of the
proposed project to contribute materials for recycling, design
considerations shall be included in each development
component that would provide adequate space and
facilities for the storage and transfer of recyclable
materials.
Repo_ rting and Monitoring, Prior to zoning clearance, the
applicant shall submit to the Community Development
Department for review and approval Final Construction
Plans which include adequate location and space within
the retail center for tenants to store and transfer recyclable
materials.
K- VISUAL RESOURCES/LIGHT AND GLARE/ARCHITECTURAL
MITIGATION MEASURES
44. Mitigation: Plant a sufficient amount of tall growing trees
and /or shrubs along the western site boundary (abutting the
wall) to minimize the glare impacts and the loss of privacy
of the nearby single- family neighborhood.
Reporting and Monitorin • Prior to zoning clearance, the
applicant shall submit a landscape and irrigation plan for
approval by the Community Development Department and
the City's Landscape Architect. The Landscape and
Irrigation Plan shall include tall growing trees along the
western property boundary.
45. Mitigation No illuminated building mounted signs shall
be permitted on any building facade facing towards a
residential neighborhood.
13 Porting and Monitoring• Prior to zoning clearance, a Sign
Program shall be submitted with the Final Construction
2-11 :.
Plans and approved by the Director of Community
Development. Illuminated building signs shall be
restricted as identified above.
46. Mitigation: All parking lot pole lights and street lights
shall be fully hooded and back shielded to reduce the light
"spillage° and glare.
Reporting and Monitoring• Prior to zoning clearance, a
Lighting Plan shall be submitted with the Final
Construction Plans and approved by the City Engineer, City
Building Official and Director of Community Development.
The Lighting Plan shall be prepared by an electrical
engineer licensed to work in the state of California.
47. Mitigation: Trees and shrubs planted along the western site
perimeter shall be a minimum 24 inch box size in order to
provide a screening effect in a short time period.
Reporting and Monitories• Prior to zoning clearance, the
applicant shall submit a landscape and irrigation plan for
approval by the Community Development Department.
The Landscape and Irrigation Plan shall include trees and
shrubs in minimum 24" box sizes along the western site
perimeter,
48. Mitigation; Colors and materials of the proposed building
shall be compatible with the surrounding area.
Reporting and Monitorin • Prior to zoning clearance, a
Building Color Chart shall be submitted with the Final
Construction Plans. This Color Chart shall be approved by
the Director of Community Development and incorporated
into the private Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions
(CC &R's) tar the project. Any proposed color change shall
reviewed by the Director of Community Development_
49. Tinted windows shall be installed to minimize
the emittance of light and glare from interior sources.
Reporting and Monitoring; Prior to zoning clearance, the
applicant shall submit Final Construction Plans which
include a sample window detail noting the requirement for
tinted windows. This shall be approved by the Director of
Community Development and incorporated into the private
Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions (CC &R's) for the
project. Any proposed change shall reviewed by the
Director of Community Development
50. Mitigation: Prior to approval of a zoning clearance, the
applicant shall have a tree report prepared consistent
with City code requirements. Landscaping shall be
provided for the commercial development which is
equivalent to the value of the 310 trees which will be
removed.
Reporting and MonitorinZ: Prior to zoning clearance, the
applicant shall submit a tree report and a landscape and
irrigation plan for approval by the Community
Development Department and City's Landscape Architect.
The tree report shall indicate the total value of all trees to
be removed.
L. `I'RAFEIGC'IRCULATION MITIGATION MEASURES
On October 17, 1990, the City Council approved the following mitigation measures in relation to
transportation improvements:
671 The applicant shall submit to the city for review and approval,
street improverraent {Mans prcljared by a registered civil engineer;
shall enter into an agreement witit the City to complete the
improvements; and shall Fir. d,:'J surety guaranteeing the
construction of the improyt.merrts. Any necessary right -of -way
acquisition necessary to coni►,lete the required improvements Trill be
acquired by the applicant at their egpt�nse.
Die improvements shall include concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk,
street lights, traffic signals, striping and signing, traffic
control, paving, and any necessary transitions to the satisfaction
Of the City Engineer. The applicable Ventura County Road Standard
Plates are as follows:
a. Los Angeles Avenue per Plate B -2A, modified north of
centerline to have 59 feet of right -of -way, 51 foot pavement
width, a 6 foot landscaped area and a 6 foot sidewalk. The
landscaped area and sidewalk shall be located within the 8
foot parkway area and a 4 foot landscape and pedestrian
easement. Applicant shall construct improvements north of the
centerline across the frontage of the project.
Applicant shall also construct sufficient roadway widening
along the south side to permit restriping for a westbound
auxiliary lane across the entire frontage of the project, as
well as a 12 foot wide eastbound right turn pocket providing
a minimum of 150 feet of storage at Liberty Bell Road. All
Los Angeles Avenue improvements shall be shown first on
preliminary plans which shall be submitted to the City for
review and approval, after which they will be submitted to
Caltrans for review and approval. Los Angeles Avenue scope of
improvements shall be returned to City Council for
consideration of alternative improvements, if Caltrans will
not approve the preliminary plans.
The applicant shall make an irrevocable offer of dedication of
an additional 9 feet across the frontage of the project. The
City may, in the future, elect to accept this dedication to
provide for construction c:f additional improvements.
The applicant shall design the main driveway project entrance
between Park Lane and Liberty Bell Road to provide two inbound
lanes and one outbound lane. The required Los Angeles Avenue
improvements shall include restriping to provide a striped
island in the vicinity or this driveway, thereby prohibiting
left turns in or out of Life criveway.
In conjunction with other tos Angeles Avenue improvements, all
necessary transitions shawl big designed and constructed to the
satisfaction of ti +t t:.;y Engineer and Caltrans. Any
improvements constructer) ty the City with Los Angeles Avenue
Area of Contribution t,nds that would normally be the
responsibility of the jj,o licant shall be offset by special
applicant contributions he Ios Angeles Avenue Area of
Contribution fund.
b. Liberty Neil Road shall be resigned and constructed to align
with the ultimate Liberty 8,11 R{aad ilignmenL south of Los
Angeles Avenue. The LH arty Hell Road - Los Angeles Avenue
Mtzrsection must be designed and constructed to provide for
necessary turning pockets and must be reviewed and approved by
the City Engineer prior to recordation so that the dedication
Of right -of -way on the map will be the ultimate right -of -way
dedication. Liberty Bell Road will be a variable width
street, with all elements designed to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer. A conceptual configuration of the proposed
improvements is shown in the attached Figure 1. Although it
is intended that the concept shown on this figure be
implemented, it is understood that final plan details such as
transition design may vary from that shown in the figure.
Landscape &
Pede -strian �-
Easement
Third Set of
L -2"l S i- F, IJ,
i
Dt ivcways 8 ;5
/ElL ;�
:
:
Second Set of
Driveways 4 g 5
:
R W - -�►
"st Set of:
i)r iveways
:
:
;4 8 12
:
J
12
Y
12 12
I
j TU
! i
1? I
2 i1, g
B/L
I�
1.2 12 5
B!L
65'
Landscape &
Pedestrian
Easement
6' Landscaped
Parkway &
--- 6' Sidewalk
:160' Transition
8 14:
12 12 12 12 5 8 4I
! � �
B/L
a
R/W
LOS ANGELES AVENUE FIGURE
1
' UBERTY BELL ROAD
C . kassen Avuaue per Plate B -SA, modified to have 56 feet of
right -of way to match the existing, previously dedicated,
alignment per Parcel Map No. 3781 on the easterly portion of
ttre project site. Lassen Avenue shall have a 6 foot sidewalk
and 4 foot landscaped a, ea on the south side, within the 8
foot parkway area and a 2 foot landscape and pedestrian
easement. All improvements south of centerline plus 12 feet
north of centerline shall be constructed. In addition, all
necessary transitions shall be constructed to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer. The only connection of Lassen Avenue to
Sierra Avenue shall be in the form of an unpaved emergency
access easement area west of Liberty Bell Road. This easement
shall be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, the
Director of Community Development, the Sheriff's Department
and the Fire Department. The connection of Lassen Avenue to
Liberty Bell Avenue shall be in tire form of a knuckle per City
standard.
d Although not a requirement of this development, it is noted
for future reference that any future street intersecting
Lassen Avenue in the vicinity of the traffic circle servicing
the proposed office buildings east of Liberty Bell Road shall
not be offset from the traffic circle.
e. Park Lane per Plate B -3D, modified west of centerline to have
28 foot right -of -way, 20 foot pavement width, 6 foot
landscaped area and 6 foot sidewalk within the 8 foot parkway
area and a 4 foot landscape and pedestrian easement; with the
portion of Park Lane located within 150 feet north of the
prolongation of the northern right -of -way of Los Angeles
Avenue designed and constructed in accordance with Plate B -30,
modified to have 65 foot right -of -way width, 49 foot pavement
width, 6 foot landscaped area and 6 foot sidewalk within the
8 foot parkway area and a 4 foot pedestrian easement. All
necessary transitions shall be designed and constructed to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer. The anticipated lane
configuration on Park Lane at the Los Angeles Avenue
intersection includes one southbound right turn lane, one
southbound through lane, one southbound left turn lane, and
one northbound through lane. To the greatest extent
Practicable, Park Lane improvements north of Los Angeles
Avenue shall align with ultimate improvements south of Los
Angeles Avenue. Design :)f the Park Lane - Los Angeles Avenue
intersection must be ieviewed and approved by the City
Engineer prior to recordation so that the dedication of right -
of -way on the map d,li be the ultimate right -of -way
dedication.
f. No portion of any project driveway may be within 150 feet of
the nearest curb prolonq.atiun of an adjacent intersection.
9. The applicant shall con�.truct the necessary improvements to
provide Class II bicycle- lanes (5 feet wide) along Liberty
Bell Road per the Circul,ltrori Llument of the Moorpark General
Plan.
S2. The applicant shall execute a covenant running with the land on
behalf of itself and its successo►-s, heirs, and assigns agreeing to
participate in the formation of an assessment district or other
financing technique includirig, but not limited to, the payment of
traffic mitigation fees, which the City may implement or adopt, and
Pub) is street and traffic improvement, directly or indirectly
affected by the development.
53, The applicant shall post sufficient surety guaranteeing completion
Of all improvements which revert to ti►e City (i.e., landscaping,
parks, fencing, Etc.) or which require removal (i.e., model homes,
temporary debris basins, etc j.
SY. Applicant shall post sufficient surety for the installation of a
tl'affic signal at the intersection of Los Angeles Avenue - Liberty
Bell Road. The applicant may be entitled to receive reimbursement
from the Los Angeles Avenue Area of Contribution of up to $65,000 or
50 percent of the construction expenses, whichever is less.
55 The applicant shall post sufficient surety for the installation of
a traffic signal at the intersection of Los Angeles Avenue - Park
Lane.
56. The applicant shall make a special contribution to the City
representing the applicant's prorata share of the costs of
improvements to the following intersections.
• Poindexter Avenue - Moorpark Avenue
• Los Angeles Avenue - Gabbert Road
_ • Los Angeles Avenue - Moorpark Avenue
• Spring Road - llew Los Angeles Avenue
To determine the costs of
first
these
improvements, the applicant
shall
prepare conceptual
Engineer, the prorata
pplops
to the satisfaction of the
City
incremental traffic added
sr►are
by Lite
shall be developed based on
the
the City Council prior to
then be
zoning
project, and shall be approved
clearance. The contribution
by
shall
paid to City, prior to zoning
clearance.
PRIOR TO € CCUPAiIC`r`, 111E Fill t fIW111j; 10i #`_; SiiAl 1. BE SATISFIED:
57 The Los Angeles Avenue - Liberty Bell Avenue traffic signal shall be
operational prior to any occupancy
for this project.
5$, The Los Angeles Avenue - Park
Lane traffic signal shall be
constructed by the appl icant prior
to the occupancy of the 160,000th
square foot and shall be operational if approved by Caltrans. If
construction of this signal is not
allowed by Caltrans at the time
of the applicant's request For
occupancy, the applicant shall
deposit 125% of the total estimated
construction cost with the City.
The required bond for this signal
can be exonerated if the cash
deposit is provided to the City.
]Iris construction cost shall
include associatEd engineering,
construction inspection and
administration costs. M is cash
deposit does not relieve the
applicant from constructing this
signal. The applicant shall
construct the signal upon receiving Caltrans permission to do so.
Sq, All street and storm drain improvements shall be constructed prior
to first occupancy. If right -of -way acquisition or Caltrans
permission can not be obtained, the applicant can request
construction deferment on those portions of construction from the
City Council.
PRIOR TO ACCEPTAiICE of PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND BOiID EXOiIERATION, THE FOLLOWHIG
CO NDIT1OiIS SHALL BE SATISFIED:
60, Sufficient surety guaranteeing the public improvements shall be
provided. The surety shall remain In place for one year following
acceptance by the City Council.
Reporting and Monitoring- Prior to zoning clearance, the applicant shall submit public improvement
plans for review and approval by the City Engineer and Caltrans.
2-P4
M. POPULATION/HOIJSINC_x MITIGATION MEASURES
NONE
N. HEALTH HAZARDS MITIGATION MEASURES
NONE
�_ra
MITIGATION MONITORING INDEX TABLE
MISSION BELL PLA./A - CPD 89 -1, 89 -2
NOVEMBER 7, 1990
MITIGATION
IMPLEMENTATION ENFORCEMENT
MONITORING
FEE
MEASURES
AGENCY
PHASE
REQUIRED
1
Applicant
City Engineer
A
No
2
Applicant
City Engineer
A
No
3
Applicant
City Engineer
C
No
4
Applicant
City Eng, CDD
AC
No
5
Applicant
CE,Insp,APCD
C
No
6
Applicant
City Engineer
C
No
7
Applicant
City Engineer
AC
No
8
Applicant
CE, APCD
C
No
`1
Applicant
CE, APCD
C
No
10
Applicant
CE, APCD
A
No
11
Applicant
City Engineer
C
No
12
Applicant
City Engineer
C
No
13
Applicant
CDD, CE, APCD
A,B,D
No
14
Applicant
CDD, CE, SCAT
A
No
15
Applicant
CDD
A
No
16
Applicant
City Engineer
B
Yes
17
Applicant
CDD
A
Yes
18
Applicant
City Engineer
C
No
19
Applicant
City Engineer
C
No
20
Applicant
City Engu Vtl
C
No
21
Applicant
CDD
B
No
22
Applicant
City Engineer
B
No
23
Applicant
Inspector
B,D
No
24
Applicant
City Engineer
C
No
25
Applicant
City Engineer
C
No
26
Applicant
CE
C
No
2:7
ApT Bean!
CE
C
No
2t3
"pplicala
CDD
B
No
29
Applicant
Applicant.
A, D
No
2 -21
30
Applicant
CDD, Cit ±y Insp.
A, D
No
31
Applicant
CDD, City Insp.
A, D
No
32
Applicant
CDD, City Insp.
A, D
No
33
Applicant
All City Staff
A,C
No
34
Applicant
All City Staff
A, B
No
35
Applicant
All City Staff
A, B
No
36
Applicant
All City Staff
A, B
No
37
Applicant
All City Staff
A, B
No
38
Applicant
All City 'staff
A,B
No
39
Applicant
CDD
B
Yes
40
Applicant
City Engineer
A, B
Yes/No
41
Applicant
City Engineer
A, B
No
42
Applicant
CE,CDD,Caltrans
A, B
No
43
Applicant
CDD CE
A, B
No
44
Applicant
CDD CE
A, B
No
45
Applicant
CDD ' CE
A, B
No
46
Applicant
CDD CE
A, B
No
47
Applicant
CE, CDD
A, B
No
48
Applicant
CDD
A
No
49
Applicant
CDD, Bldg Insp
A
No
50
Applicant
CDD
A
No
51
Applicant
CE, CDD,Caltrans
A
No
52
Applicant
CE, CDD,Caltrans
A
No
53
Applicant
CE, CDD,Caltrans
A
No
54
Applicant
CE, CDD,Caltrans
A
No
55
Applicant
CE, CDD,( altrans
q
No
56
Applicant
CE, CDD,( aitrans
A
No
57
Applicant
CE, CDD,Caltrans
A
No
58
Applicant
CE, CDD,Caltrans
A
No
59
Applicant
CE, CDD,C'altrans
A
No
60
A =
Applicant CE,. CDD,'- >1trans
Prior to Zoning Clearance
A
No
B =
Prior to Occupancy
C =
During Construction
Phase
D =
Post - Occupancy
2 -22
SIR MITIGATION REPORTING & MONITORINI.- . ECKLIST:
Pre ;ect Name:
i'ro ;ecl Case Numbers:
',pplicant:
,i;,,roval Date:
.1it19alion Measure
Resolution Number:
Monitonng Division
- -- -The following abbreviated environmental mitigation measures were incorporated
into the Conditions of Approval for this project in order to mitigate or avoid identified
significant environmental impacts. This checklist indicates the extent to which each
mitigation measure has been compiled with and implemented. (The approved list
of mitigation measures and reporting /monitoring program are attached)
Shown # of
Condition on Reports Report Fee Paid Other
# Plans Required Filed
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ZONING CLEARANCE
PRIOR TO PERMISSION FOR OCCUPANCY
ONGOING
Kplanation of Headings
)nitoring Div. o Department, agency, or private firm, responsible for monitoring Fee Paid
that specific mitigation measure
ov: n on Plans a It a mitigation measure is shown on plans, this column will be ini- Other
tialed and dated Remarks
port Filed. _ If a mitigation report is filed, this column will be initialedanddated
Remarks
- If a fee is required, this column will be initialed and dated
- This column is for other mitigation reporting mechanisms
- Area for describing statusofanongoing mitigation measure, orfor
other information
RESOLUTION Rio. 90--
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, DENYING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
PERMIT NO. RPD -89 -1, GREENLEAF APARTMENT
PROJECT (MACLEOD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY)
WHEREAS, at duly noticed public hearings on June 4, June 11,
and July 2, 1990, the Planning Commission considered the
application filed by Macleod Construction Company requesting
approval to construct the Greenleaf Apartment Project on a 15.14 -
acre site located south of Poindexter Avenue, east of Sierra
Avenue, and west of Chaparral Middle School (APN's 511 - 080 -245,
511 - 080 -255, and 511- 080 -265); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission after review and
consideration of the proposed apartment project application, the
Draft Environmental Impact Report, and the staff reports, adopted
a resolution recommending that the City Council deny the requested
project; and
WHEREAS, at duly noticed public hearings on July 25, August 1,
August 15, September 19, and October 17, 1990, the City Council
considered the application filed by Macleod Construction Company
and considered the information contained in the staff reports and
in the Environmental Impact Report; and
WHEREAS, ath 'itxr <t�nci meeting of September 19, 1990,
the applicant proposed a` substantial redesign of the Greenleaf
Apartment Project which would require the filing of entitlement
permits not previously requested; and
WHEREAS, the City Council closed the public hearing for the
project at its meeting of October 17, 1990, considered the
recommendations of the Planning Commission and staff, voted to
certify the Final Environmental. Impact Report, and reached its
decision on the requested residential. planned development permit
application;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS
SECTION 1. Pursuant to the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 of the Public Resources Code
of the State of California) , the City Council of the City of
Moorpark has certified the FIR for- the Mission Bell Plaza and
Greenleaf Apartment Projects.
SECTION 2. The City Council hereby denies Residential Planned
Development Permit No. RPD -89 -1 without prejudice based on the
following findings:
Resolution No. 90-
Page 2
The applicant has proposed a redesign of the residential
project which requires approval of entitlements that have not
been filed, including a tentative tract map.
The redesigned residential project requires supplemental
environmental review to determine potential environmental
impacts.
The Greenleaf Apartment Project, as originally proposed, is
not considered to be compatible with the adjacent residential
development.
The Greenleaf Apartment Project, as originally proposed, would
be detrimental to the public welfare.
A denial without prejudice decision will allow the applicant
to immediately file the appropriate entitlement applications
for the revised Greenleaf Residential project and return the
project for final City Council action after the appropriate
environmental clearance document has been completed.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1990.
Bernardo M. Perez, Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA APPROVING COMMERCIAL
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMITS NOS. CPD -89 -1 & 2
FOR MISSION BELL PLAZA (APPLICANTS: MACLEOD
CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AND VENTURA PACIFIC
CAPITAL COMPANY)
WHEREAS, at duly noticed public hearings on July 25,
August 1, August 15, September 19 and October 17, 1990, the City
Council considered the applications filed by Ventura Pacific
Capital Company and Macleod Construction Company requesting
approval of Commercial Planned Development Permits Nos CPD 89 1 &
2 rhr YL t�fsr►4t r*t�t"�t -.a i1n> �Tti .,.,o ;.a+ . ice. . :1'r ��1 >s: _ �. i.. .�..K•...;:. Y:
1 ,- i;-� 4tF2.` i $J':; >: 1I$S on
properties located .. north .. of Los' Angeles hAveriue south of the
proposed Lassen Avenue extension, west of Park Lane, and east of an
existing residential neighborhood in the City of Moorpark (Asses�v.
Paroel Nos..511 Q8a 195j -205, -215, r , 2 5� 26Sr 15, -3 �.
and .327 • and
WHEREAS, the proposed project is compatible with the
objects, policies and goals specified in the Moorpark General Plan;
and
WHEREAS, at its meetings of July 25, August 1, August 15
September 19, and pctober'!1.7, 1990, the City Council opened the
public hearing and took testimony from all those wishing to testify
and then closed the public hearing on QZe`?7, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the City Council after review and consideration
of the information contained in the Staff Report dated July 25,
1990 and the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
prepared for the proposed project has reached a decision on this
matter; and
WHEREAS, on October 17, 1990, the City Council directed
staff to prepare a resolution approving the Lower Commercial
component of CPD -89 -1 & 2, as shown on Exhibit A (site plan artcl
ions) which is attached hereto and incorporated herein* by
this reference.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council adopts the findings
contained in the City Council Staff Report dated July 25, 1990,
which is incorporated herein by reference in Exhibit B as though
fully set forth.
-I1-
SECTION 2. Pursuant to the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 of the Public
Resources Code of the State of California), the City Council of the
City of Moorpark determines that the environmental issues, effects
and mitigation of the proposed project is similar to those
addressed in the EIR prepared for the proposed project and that the
SECTION 3. That the City Council finds that the
proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan.
SECTION 4. That the proposed project will provide
desirable characteristics which will be compatible with existing
and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood.
1990. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER
Bernardo M. Perez, Mayor
City of Moorpark
ATTEST:
Lillian E. Kellerman
City Clerk
Exhibits:
Exhibit A: Approved Site Plan and elevations for lower
commercial component
Exhibit B - Findings incorporated by reference
Exhibit C - Conditions of Approval dated 11 -7 -90
_2__
November 7, 1990
REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR CPD'S 89 -1 AND 2
19. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance, the applicant
shall pay all outstanding case, pxaces%ng (plaz�nilg anc
engin�eng1 and environmental impact report preparation costs
for CPD 89 -1' and 89 -2.
24c. A 2;0(-foot landscaped setback (not including the public right -
of -way) shall be provided along Los Angeles Avenue, Liberty
Bell Avenue, and Park Lane
26i.
28. Delete.
31. All trash disposal areas shall be provided in a location which
will not interfere with circulation, parking, or access to the
buildings and shall be screened with a six foot high, solid
wall enclosure with metal gates. The tra�h::dlsogal:ar$as
50.
11a4- t:%LyCL.LZs.: •rne rinal aesign of the trash enclosure
shall be subject to the approval of the Director of Community
Development prior to the issuance of a zoning clearance.
60. Delete.
66. The continued maintenance of the permit area and facilities
shall be subject to periodic inspection by the City. The
permittee shall be required to remedy any defects in ground
maintenance, as indicated by the Code Enforcement Officer
within five (5) days after notification. Landscan ;nR
��; o�,. the subject commercial:
67. Delete.
NnvAmhar 7 iogn
79.
I-J�'
83c. Lassen Avenue per Plate B -5A, modified to have 56 feet of
right -of -way to match the existing, previously dedicated,
alignment per Parcel Map No. 3781 on the easterly portion of
the project site. Lassen Avenue shall have a 6 foot sidewalk
and 4 foot landscaped area on the south side, within the 8
foot parkway area and a 2 foot landscape and pedestrian
easement. All improvements south of centerline plus 12 feet
north of centerline shall be constructedxotldna..t}e
In aaaltlon, all necessary
transitions shall'be constructed to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer. The only connection of Lassen Avenue to Sierra
Avenue shall be in the form of an unpaved emergency access
easement area west of Liberty Bell Road. This easement shall
be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, the Director of
Community Development, the Sheriff's Department and the Fire
Department. The connection of Lassen Avenue to Liberty Bell
Avenue shall be in the form of a knuckle per City standard.
144. Construction activities shall
179.
, ana shall exc
RESOLUTION NO.,
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA APPROVING LAND
DIVISION NO. LDM -89 - 2 (APPLTCAIJT.. MACI,EOl
C��T�'I`RUCTSON .COANy'�
WHEREAS, at duly noticed public hearings on July 25,
August 1, August 15, September 19, and October 17, 1990, the City
Council considered the application filed by the Macleod
Construction Company for Land Division (parcel map) No. LDM -89 -2
for properties located in an area south of Poindexter Avenue, north
of Los Angeles Avenue, west of Park Lane in the City of Moorpark
+.Yi.Q+a.Aeb.r+.a T7 i..A R 1. ...tiyy ; ::z ♦ .t ;:.:yK A IM1 e:'.c w <: ;:. :�.�: .....
WHEREAS, at its meetings of July 25, August 1, August 15,
September 19, and Oc pb ;> 1.7 .: 1990, the City Council opened the
public hearing, and took testimony from all those wishing to
testify and then closed the public hearing on October! ?s9t; and
WHEREAS, the City Council after review and consideration
of the information contained in the Staff Report dated July 25,
1990 and the Draft and Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
prepared for the Mission Bell Plaza and Greenleaf Apartment
Projects has reached a decision on this matter;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK,
CALIFORNIA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS
SECT10N 1. The City Council adopts the findings
contained in the City Council Staff Report dated July 25, 1990,
which is incorporated herein by reference as Exhibit A as though
fully set forth, as well as those conditions of approval as stated
in attached Ehibt.;S.
SECTION 2. Pursuant to the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (Division 13 of the Public
Resources Code of the State of California) , the City Council of the
City of Moorpark determines that the environmental issues, effects
and mitigation of the proposed project is similar to those
addressed in the EIR prepared for the proposed project, and that
SECTION 3. That the City Council finds that the
proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan.
SECTION 4. That the City Council approves Tentative
Parcel Map No. LDM -89 -2 pursuant to the findings in the Staff
Report dated July 25, 1990, and the conditions of approval attached
as Exhibit B to this resolution. This.$ptij(3V',�1 �g f[yY+
1990. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER
Bernardo M. Perez, Mayor
City of Moorpark
ATTEST:
Lillian E. Kellerman
City Clerk
Exhibits:
Exhibit A - Findings incorporated by reference
Exhibit B - Conditions of Approval
November 7, 1990
4. Delete
17. Delete
19a.
REVISED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR LDM -89 -2
32. Delete.
48. Delete.