HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1990 0725 CC REG ITEM 08FBERNARDO M. PEREZ
Mayor
SCOTT MONTGOMERY
Mayor Pro Tem
ELOISE BROWN
Councilmember
CLINT HARPER, Ph.D.
Councilmember
PAUL W. LAWRASON, Jr.
Councilmember
LILLIAN KELLERMAN
City Clerk
MOORPARK
ITEM 60
STEVEN KUENY
City Manager
CHERYL J.KANE
�y
City Attorney
)ORPARK, CALIFO
0l*RICK RICHARDS, A.I.C.P.
CitY Council Meefing Director of
of -� _ 199�ommunity Development
�R�.ENNIS DELZEIT
ACT{ City Engineer
JOHN V. GILLESPIE
Chief of Police
gy HARD T. HARE
IT - vc/,Z-64�1 i&
c u., � ity Treasurer
To: Honorable City Council
From: Patrick J. Richards, Director of Community Development
Date: July 13, 1990 (CC meeting of 7- 25 -90)
Subject: RPD 1070 Minor Modification No. 2
Background
On November 9, 1987 the City Council adopted Resolution 87 -428
approving Vesting Tentative Tract 4340 and Residential Planned
Development Permit 1070 allowing construction of 166 single family
homes and two recreation lots on a 90.1 acre parcel. On August 15, 1989
Minor Modification No.1 to Planned Development Permit 1070 was
approved by the Director of Community Development. This tract was
originally approved with minor architectural variations from those in
North and South Village. Thus, there had been little to distinguish the
three villages from each other. During the public hearings for this tract
there were comments to the effect that the design and character of the
West Village was too much like that of South Village, and there was little
to give it it's own distinct character. Nn rethinking the comments of the
City Council, Urban West decided to incorporate the comments presented
at these past hearings by making modifications to the design of West
Village beginning with Minor Modification No. 1. The purpose of that
Modification was to conform to the Planned Community 3 concept of
providing variations among North, Sour." and West Villages which was
lacking between the previously completed Nut th and South Villages. A
summary of the approved modifications includes modifications to the
sizes and floor plans of the houses, changes in tti° common area
landscaping, modification to the iandscaping to include rt,:`re drought
799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805) 529 -68x.1
tolerant plants, changes in the design of the fences and walls and
elevation changes to the units. These modifications were made to the
Deauville tract in order to create a slightly different character than
exists for the homes in either North or South Village. As in North and
South Village the architectural themes remain Spanish, Traditional and
Mediterranean, but modifications were made to create a different
character between West Village and the already completed phases. The
three architectural themes are each present within each of the three
tracts rather than each tract of West Village being limited to one theme.
Discussion
The requested Minor Modification (No. 2) to PD 1070 is for minor exterior
elevation changes to those that were previously approved in Minor
Modification No. 1. Numerous changes in the architectural details of the
houses are proposed, including numbers of windows and locations, door
design, corbels, balcony rails, vents, changing multi to single -pane
windows, and architectural details. Examples of the changes include
converting windows to vents where the location is in an attic and
enlarging the spacing of corbels under a window to improve appearance.
Each house will still maintain its architectural theme and the proposed
modifications would not affect the appearance of the houses. Most
modifications are being made to improve the appearance or match with the
previously modified floor plans. The colors and materials to be utilized
will remain unaffected. It is staff's opinion that the multi -pane windows
in the front elevation should not be replaced with single -pane windows.
To do so will preserve a higher quality appearance. The Director of
Community Development will condition that the multi -pane windows be
maintained in the front elevation should the Council elect to only Receive
and File this report. Staff has met with Urban West to review the proposed
changes and The Director is satisfied that the changes made between the
approved elevations and those proposed in this application will meet the
intent and approved design of the original permit with the exception of the
multi -pane vs. single -pane windows.
The Director of Community Development has reviewed the proposed
Modification and intends is approve 11,1. Pursuant to Resolution 86 -523 the
Director has the authority to appro�- Minor Modifications. This matter s
being presented to the Council as a cu�lrtesy in the event the Cc,,ncil
wishes to appeal the Director's decision, it may do so. Should the Council
desire to appeal, it should set a public hearing date. The next available
meeting date would be the Council's regular meeting of August 15, 1990.
If the Council takes no action then the Director's decision stands.
Recommendation
Receive and file.
Due to the number of elevations which exist for each side of each floor
plan for both the approve and proposed elevations no exhibits are
presented as part of this report; however, the approved and proposed
elevations will be available at the Council meeting and are currently
available for review in the Director of Community Development's office.
Staff has provided a sample of the difference in single -pane vs. multi -
pane windows for Council consideration.
'•. ,I k.,11! ]..i -F ;' -
M 4. •�,e.+. w-.e.� +,� ,+c: ac;, - �ww r : , .c.•.. . r .. s. . . .. - . :. -
1'EM. ;
,y F
4MPLE)
APPROVED
� T
4MPLE)
APPROVED
ELEVATin
� T
ol V,:;,►ac,
PROPOSED ELEVATION (SAMPLE)
tONT �I EyATInN