Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2016 0420 CCSA REG ITEM 10G ITEM 10.G. CITY OF MOORPARK,CALIFORNIA City Councii Meeting of -A0/t'' ACTON: ,,,�,p at. MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL. y- AGENDA REPORT BY: l„,, TO: Honorable City Council qq,, �— I FROM: Sean Corrigan, City Engineer/Public Works Director JS ✓v Prepared By: Shaun Kroes, Program Manager DATE: April 8, 2016 (CC Meeting of 04/20/16) SUBJECT: Consider Approval of Amendment to Implementation Agreement for the Ventura Countywide Stormwater Quality Management Program BACKGROUND The current Implementation Agreement for the Ventura Countywide Stormwater Quality Management Program (Implementation Agreement), approved in 2010, is between the Ventura County Watershed Protection District(District), the ten Ventura County cities and Ventura County (Co-permittees). The Implementation Agreement reflects the Co- permittees' National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit issued by the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board) on July 8, 2010, Order No. R4-2010-0108, (Permit). The Implementation Agreement defines the fiscal responsibilities (expenditures and contributions) of all collective parties with respect to the current Permit, from July 2010 to the expiration of the Permit, anticipated to be the end of 2016. It formalizes the Principal Permittee's (District) and Co-permittees' commitment to cooperate and to mutually fund an integrated Countywide Stormwater Program (Program) of protecting and improving water quality in Ventura County. The Implementation Agreement allows for sharing of Principal Permittee's costs among all the Co-permittees. DISCUSSION The Permit expired on July 8, 2015 and is on administrative extension. The Implementation Agreement remains in place until the adoption of a new stormwater permit. The Principal Permittee and Co-permittees are looking forward to working with the Regional Board on crafting a permit that is appropriate for the Co-permittees. Currently, a new permit is expected to be adopted and effective by late 2016 or early 2017, and will have a term of five years. Upon adoption of a new permit the Implementation Agreement expires. The Principal Permittee and Co-permittees anticipate that a new stormwater permit will require continued coordination and development of new stormwater programs. - S.\Public Works\Everyone\Reports\Staff Reports\2016\4_April\-20-2016(Strmwtr Imp!Agrmnt).doc 146 Honorable City Council April 20, 2016 Page 2 Extending the Implementation Agreement for one year beyond the expiration of the Permit will enable the agencies to continue to work on the stormwater programs as well as develop a revised Implementation Agreement (if necessary) to reflect the requirements established by the new stormwater permit. FISCAL IMPACT The proposed amendment to the Implementation Agreement does not change the cost sharing formula,which distributes costs of the Program between all Co-permitees and the Principal Permittee on an annual basis, during the term of the Permit, based on Benefit Assessment Unit ratios of the Co-permittees (the Principal Permittee pays 50% of the Program costs). The City budgets $40,000 each fiscal year (FY) for its share. The City's FY 2015/16 Budget includes $40,000 for the Program. The draft FY 2016/17 Budget includes $40,000 for the Program as well. Expenditures come from the City's General Fund (1000). STAFF RECOMMENDATION Authorize the Mayor to sign the Amendment subject to final language approval by the City Manager. Attachment Implementation Agreement Amendment S:\Public Works\Everyone\Reports\Staff Reports\20161/24_April\4-20-2016(Strmwtr Impl Agrmnt).doc 147 NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT VENTURA COUNTYWIDE STORMWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM This AMENDMENT to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Implementation Agreement (a copy of which is attached as Attachment 1) is entered into by and among the County of Ventura hereinafter referred to as COUNTY, the Ventura County Watershed Protection District hereinafter referred to as DISTRICT, and the Cities of Camarillo, Fillmore, Moorpark, Ojai, Oxnard, Port Hueneme, San Buenaventura, Santa Paula, Simi Valley, and Thousand Oaks, hereinafter collectively referred to as CITIES, with respect to the following matters: RECITALS Whereas, the CITIES, the COUNTY, and the DISTRICT desire to continue funding and implementing an integrated Stormwater Discharge Management Program with the objective of protecting and improving water quality in Ventura County; and Whereas, the CITIES, the COUNTY, and the DISTRICT currently operate the Ventura Countywide Stormwater Quality Management Program pursuant to an Implementation Agreement approved by the CITIES, the COUNTY, and the DISTRICT in 2010 (AGREEMENT); and Whereas, the AGREEMENT continues in effect during the term of the NPDES Permit issued by the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Board) on July 8, 2010 (Order No. R4-2010-0108); and Whereas, Regional Board Order No. R4-2010-0108 (PERMIT) adopted on July 8, 2010 expired on July 8, 2015 and is currently on administrative extension; and Whereas, unless amended as set forth herein, the AGREEMENT will cease to be in effect when a new permit becomes effective; and Whereas, the CITIES, the COUNTY, and the DISTRICT desire to modify the AGREEMENT as it relates to the Term of the AGREEMENT. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties mutually agree the AGREEMENT is amended as follows: 1. TERM This AMENDMENT will become effective upon approval of all the CITIES, the COUNTY, and the DISTRICT, and the AGREEMENT and this AMENDMENT will continue in effect until one (1) year after a new permit adopted by the Regional Board to replace the PERMIT issued by the Regional Board on July 8, 2010 (Order No. R4-2010-0108) becomes effective, or until terminated in the manner provided for in the AGREEMENT. 148 2. AGREEMENT IN EFFECT Except as otherwise specifically provided herein, all other provisions of the AGREEMENT remain in full force and effect. 3. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT Each party covenants that each individual executing this AMENDMENT on behalf of each party is a person duly authorized and empowered to execute this AGREEMENT for such party. 4. EXECUTION IN COUNTERPARTS This AMENDMENT may be executed and delivered in any number of counterparts or copies by the parties hereto. Each party may supply a signature page appropriate to its approval processes and format. When each party has signed and delivered at least one (1) counterpart to the other parties hereto, each counterpart will be deemed an original and, taken together, constitute one and the same AMENDMENT, which will be binding and effective as to the parties hereto. The parties to this AMENDMENT are as follows: Ventura County Watershed Protection District 800 South Victoria Avenue Ventura, CA 93009 Attn: Director of Watershed Protection District Phone: (805) 654-2040; Fax (805) 654-3350 County of Ventura 800 South Victoria Avenue Ventura, CA 93009 Attn: Director of Public Works Phone: (805) 654-2073; Fax (805) 654-3952 City of Camarillo 601 Carmen Drive Camarillo, CA 93010 Attn: Director of Public Works Phone: (805) 388-5307; Fax (805) 388-5318 City of Fillmore 250 Central Avenue Fillmore, CA 93015 Attn: Director of Public Works Phone: (805) 524-3701; Fax (805) 524-5707 Page 2 of 15 149 City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, CA 93021 Attn: Director of Public Works Phone: (805) 517-6285; Fax (805) 532-2555 City of Ojai 401 South Ventura Street Ojai, CA 93023 Attn: Director of Public Works Phone: (805) 646-5581; Fax (805) 646-1980 City of Oxnard 305 West Third Street Oxnard, CA 93030 Attn: Director of Public Works Phone: (805) 385-8280; Fax (805) 385-7907 City of Port Hueneme 250 North Ventura Road Port Hueneme, CA 93041 Attn: Director of Public Works Phone: (805) 986-5000; Fax (805) 986-6660 City San Buenaventura 501 Poli Street Ventura, CA 93001 Attn: Director of Public Works Phone: (805) 654-7800; Fax: (805) 652-0865 City of Santa Paula P.O. Box 569 Santa Paula, CA 93061-0569 Attn: Director of Public Works Phone: (805) 933-4298; Fax (805) 525-3742 City of Simi Valley 2929 Tapo Canyon Road Simi Valley, CA 93063 Attn: Director of Public Works Phone: (805) 583-6786; Fax (805) 583-6300 City of Thousand Oaks 2100 Thousand Oaks Boulevard Thousand Oaks, CA 91362 Attn: Public Works Director Phone: (805)-449-2457; Fax (805) 449-2475 Page 3 of 15 150 NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT VENTURA COUNTYWIDE STORMWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM City of Moorpark Signature Page CITY OF MOORPARK Janice S. Parvin, Mayor Date City of Moorpark ATTEST: Maureen Benson, City Clerk Page 8 of 15 151 Attachment 1 NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT VENTURA COUNTYWIDE STORMWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM This AGREEMENT is between the County of Ventura hereinafter referred to as COUNTY,the Ventura County Watershed Protection District hereinafter referred to as DISTRICT and the Cities of Camarillo,Fillmore, Moorpark, Ojai,Oxnard,Port Hueneme, San Buenaventura,Santa Paula, Simi Valley and Thousand Oaks,hereinafter collectively referred to as CITIES,with respect to the following matters: RECITALS Whereas,Congress in 1987 amended Section 402 of the Federal Clean Water Act[33 U.S.C.A. 1342(p)] to require the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)to promulgate regulations for stormwater discharges; and Whereas,these regulations require the control of pollutants for stormwater discharges by requiring a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System("NPDES")permit for the discharge of stormwater into waters of the United States; and Whereas,the CITIES,the COUNTY and the DISTRICT entered into a series of agreements beginning in 1992("Implementation Agreements") to fund and develop an integrated stormwater discharge management program with the objective of protecting and improving water quality in Ventura County;and Whereas,pursuant to the Implementation Agreements,the CITIES,the COUNTY, and the DISTRICT jointly filed an application with the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board(Regional Board) for a NPDES permit; and Whereas,the Regional Board in 1994 adopted Order No. 94-082 which regulated stormwater discharges in Ventura County;and Whereas,the Regional Board in 2000 replaced Order No. 94-082 with Order No. 00- 108; and Whereas,the Regional Board on May 7, 2009 replaced Order No, 00-108 with Order No. 09-0057; and Whereas, the Regional Board on July 8,2010 adopted Order No. 2010-0108(PERMIT), which designates the CITIES, the COUNTY and the DISTRICT as "Co-Permittees"and designates the DISTRICT as the"Principal Permittee;"and Whereas,the Implementation Agreements provide, among other things, for the fimding of NPDES program requirements through the DISTRICT's Benefit Assessment Program;and 1-9 152 Whereas, the CITIES, the COUNTY, and the DISTRICT have approved annual extensions of the Implementation Agreements in order to provide annual fimding for NPDES program requirements; and Whereas,the latest extension of the Implementation Agreements will expire on June 30,2010;and Whereas,the CITIES,the COUNTY, and the DISTIRCT mutually desire to modify, among other things, the cost share provisions under the Implementation Agreement in accordance with changes to the NPDES Program while preserving the Benefit Assessment Program as a source of funding for the program; and Whereas, cooperation among the CITIES,the COUNTY and the DISTRICT to jointly implement a Countywide NPDES Stormwater Program is in the best interests of the CITIES,the COUNTY and the DISTRICT; and Whereas,the CITIES, COUNTY and DISTRICT also operate municipal storm drain systems and discharge stormwater and urban runoff pursuant to the PERMIT; and Whereas, the CITIES,COUNTY and DISTRICT as Co-Permittees have obtained, renewed and complied with the PERMIT; and Whereas,the PERMIT requires the Co-Permittees to coordinate the development and implementation of a stormwater quality management program. NOW,THEREFORE,the parties do mutually agree as follows: 1. PURPOSE: This AGREEMENT establishes the rights and responsibilities of each party with respect to funding and compliance with the PERMIT. 2. CONDUCT OP VENTURE: The responsibilities of the CITIES,COUNTY and DISTRICT are as described in the PERMIT and as described below: A. Each Co-Permittee is independently responsible for complying with the requirements of the PERMIT within its own jurisdiction and complying with any individual enforcement actions pertaining to permit violations issued by the Regional Board. B. The Ventura Countywide Stormwater Quality Management Program (PROGRAM)will be managed by a Management Committee(COMMITTEE). The COMMITTEE will be composed of twelve(12)members;one representative of each of the CITIES,COUNTY, and the DISTRICT. The COMMITTEE will be the principal forum for directing the activities of PROGRAM. The COMMITTEE will be chaired by the representative of the Principal Permittee named in the PERMIT. C. Each member of the COMMI11 hE will have one vote for any motion.Any budgetary motion must be approved by a 2/3 majority vote of the COMMIT IhE (8 of 12), and any non-budgetary motion must be approved by majority vote. 2-9 153 D. Rules governing the efficient operation of the PROGRAM(Appendix A)and COMMITTEE(Appendix B), including the definition of Co-permittee activities, Principal Permittee activities(Administration,Reporting,Monitoring, Countywide Outreach), as defined by the COMMITTEE are incorporated herein and attached as appendices. The Public Works Directors Committee (DIRECTORS)will be composed of 12 members;the Public Works Director of each of the ten Clubs, the County's Public Works Director,and the District's Director,or their designees. E. The DISTRICT,in addition to being a Co-Permittee,performs the services of the Principal Permittee. If there should be a transition of any Principal Permittee service(s)to another service provider, it is the intent of the Co-Permittees that a reasonable time period be required to enable a smooth transition of those services that minimizes the DISTRICT's loss in either infrastructure or staff levels. For external expenses of tasks over$50,000,Co-Permittees have the option of directing the Principal Permittee to go through a competitive process for choosing the method of delivery of services. F. DISPUTE RESOLUTION: Any COMMITTEE member may appeal any formal decision of the COMMITTEE to the DIRECTORS. All appeals brought to the DIRECTORS must be decided by a 2/3 majority vote of the DIRECTORS. 3. FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES: COMMITTEE-approved activities performed by the Principal Permittee benefit all of the Co-Permittees. By pooling resources,the Co-Permittees benefit from cost sharing and better coordination of permit-required activities. Each of the Co-Permittees has a responsibility to fund a portion of the budget for services performed by the Principal Permittee. Principal Permittee activities,in general,consist of the following: program administration/coordination, reporting;monitoring and public outreach. In addition, those activities not included in the annually approved Principal Permittee budget(for instance,those activities specific to one party)are not the responsibility of the Co-Permittees. A. Principal Permittee Costs—The DISTRICT will pay 50%of the Principal Permittee cost, annually, with one exception:for Fiscal Year(July 1 through June 30; FY)2010-2011,the DISTRICT will contribute 50% up to,but not exceeding, one million dollars ($1,000,000). If the Principal Permittee costs for FY 2010- 2011 exceed two million dollars ($2,000,000),those excess costs will be shared among the CITIES and COUNTY,as described in subsection 3.B.i. B. Co-Permittee Costs i. CITIES and COUNTY will pay the cost for approved Principal Permittee expenses,less the DISTRICT's cost share,per subsection 3.A.,proportional to the current Benefit Assessment Unit(BAU) ratios. The BAU ratios are updated annually according to the County Assessor's records. 3-9 154 ii. All Co-Permittees will pay their own costs for Co-Permittee activities not assigned to the Principal Permittee. iii. The CITIES and COUNTY will investigate alternatives to the BAU cost- sharing method and,in good faith, discuss and try to reach consensus,on maintaining the current method for cost-sharing,or amending this AGREEMENT to initiate an alternative cost-sharing method. The investigation and discussion will take place in FY 2010-2011 with the goal to reach a consensus by April 1,2011,so an amendment, if necessary,can be prepared to be approved by all the Co-Permittees and implemented on July 1,2011, for FY 2011-2012 and beyond. 4. FUNDING SOURCES A. Co-Permittees may continue to fluid requirements described in Section 3 through the DISTRICT'S Benefit Assessment Program in accordance with annual requests submitted to the DISTRICT. Each annual request must be supported by a program description, budget, and such other information reasonably requested by the DISTRICT. The Co-Permittees' share of the Principal Permittee budget may be deducted from the proceeds of the Benefit Assessment Program or by payment to DISTRICT. Co-permittees must notify DISTRICT by February 1 of each year of their preferred method. B. The Co-Permittees will collaborate with the DISTRICT,and invite them to participate in additional funding source(s)for activities to comply with Order No. 2010-0108. 5. RECORDS AND ACCOUNTING: By February In of each year,the Principal Permittee must prepare a projected detailed annual budget by activity,including but not limited to, labor and fixed costs for COMMITTEE review and approval for the following fiscal year. • A. The Principal Permittee must implement accounting tracking mechanisms in order to report and describe contributions and expenditures annually. B. Each year Principal Permittee expenditures will be reconciled against the approved budget. Any unexpended Principal Permittee funds will be refimded to the Co-Permittees in the subsequent year. C. The Principal Permittee will retain all permit-required documents and fiscal records for five years,and make available for review by any Co-Permittee,the Regional Board and/or the USEPA. 6. FINANCIAL IMPLEMENTATION DATE: The financial aspects of this AGREEMENT will take effect on July 1,2010. 7. AMENDMENTS TO AGREEMENT: This AGREEMENT will be re-evaluated with each new NPDES permit and prior to the finalization of any new major PROGRAM funding source. This AGREEMENT may be amended by written consent of the Co- 4-9 155 Permittees, signed and approved by the governing body of each Co-permittee. Any amendment must comply with the requirements and regulations set forth by the Regional Board. Should,during the AGREEMENT term, Order No.2010-0108 be revised,the parties will have the right to call for renegotiating the financial terms described in this AGREEMENT. Revision of Order No. 2010-0108 through a TMDL reopener process(incorporation of newly adopted TMDLs into the Order)are not considered for these purposes a call for renegotiation. 8. NON-COMPLIANCE WITH PERMIT: Any Co-permittee or Principal Permittee not in compliance with the PERMIT within its jurisdiction or scope of responsibility will be solely responsible for any lawfully assessed penalties. 9. APPENDAGE OF AGREEMENT: Any Co-permittee may negotiate a separate AGREEMENT with other Co-Permittees or with all Co-Permittees regarding stormwater/urban runoff discharge management issues. Such agreements will not be appended to this AGREEMENT however,they may reference this AGREEMENT. 10. WITHDRAWAL FROM THE AGREEMENT: A Co-Permittee may withdraw from this AGREEMENT after giving at least 180 days' written notice of withdrawal to the Principal Permittee and the Regional Board. The Principal Permittee must notify the remaining Co-Permittees within ten(10)business days of receipt of such notice. A. The withdrawing Co-Permittee must obtain a separate Stormwater NPDES permit prior to withdrawal and comply with all permit requirements established by the Regional Board. Any withdrawing Co-permittee will be responsible for its share of Principal Permittee and shared costs for the remainder of the budget year of withdrawal. B. The withdrawing Co-Permittee will be solely responsible for all lawfully assessed penalties as a consequence of withdrawal. The cost allocations to the remaining Co-Permittees will be recalculated in the following budget year. 12. EXECUTION IN COUNTERPARTS: This AGREEMENT may be executed and delivered in any number of counterparts or copies by the parties. When each party has signed and delivered at least one counterpart to the other parties, each counterpart will be deemed an original,and taken together,will constitute one and the same AGREEMENT,which will be binding and effective as to all the parties. 13. FEDERAL AND STATE GUIDELINES: This AGREEMENT is meant to be consistent with the terms of all applicable Federal and State permit regulations or guidelines as presently written and as may be amended during the term of this AGREEMENT. If any provision of this AGREEMENT conflicts with any Federal or State permit regulation or guideline, the guideline will take precedence.All provisions, which remain consistent, will remain in force and effect. 14. TERM: This AGREEMENT will become effective upon approval of all 12 Co- Permittees and will continue in effect until the term of the Permit Sued by the Board on July 8,2010(Order No.2010-0108) expires,or until terminated in the manner provided for in this AGREEMENT. 5-9 156 15. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT: A 2/3 majority(8 of 12)of the Co-Permittees may terminate this AGREEMENT by mutual written consent. 16.NOTICES: All notices and correspondence will be deemed duly given, if(a)sent by certified U.S.mail;(b)delivered by hand; (c)deposited in the U.S. mail,postage prepaid and notice to the addresses of such mailing by phone immediately after deposit in the U.S.mail;(d)emailed and notice to the recipient by phone immediately after sending the email; or(e)faxed to the Principal Permittee and confirmation by phone immediately after sending the fax. All notices and correspondence must be sent or delivered to the following respective addresses or phone numbers of the parties: Ventura County Watershed Protection District 800 South Victoria Avenue Ventura, CA 93009 Attn: Director of Watershed Protection District Phone: (805)654-2040; Fax(805)654-3350 County of Ventura 800 South Victoria Avenue Ventura,CA 93009 Attn:Director of Public Works Phone: (805)654-2073; Fax(805)654-3952 City of Camarillo 601 Carmen Drive Camarillo,CA 93010 Attn: Director of Public Works Phone: (805)388-5307; Fax(805)388-5318 City of Fillmore 250 Central Avenue Fillmore,CA 93015 Attn: Director of Public Works Phone: (805)524-3701;Fax (805)524-5707 City of Moorpark 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark,CA 93021 Attn: City Engineer/Public Works Director Phone: (805)517-6255; Fax(805)532-2555 City of Ojai 401 South Ventura Street Ojai,CA 93023 Attn: Director of Public Works Phone: (805)640-2560; Fax (805)640-2571 6-9 157 City of Oxnard 305 West Third Street Oxnard, CA 93030 Attn: Director of Public Works Phone: (805) 385-8280; Fax(805) 385-7907 City of Port Hueneme 250 North Ventura Road Port Hueneme, CA 93041 Attn:Director of Public Works Phone: (805) 986-6568;Fax(805) 986-6660 City San Buenaventura 501 Poli Street Ventura, CA 93001 Attn: Director of Public Works Phone:(805) 654-7800; Fax:(805)652-0865 City of Santa Paula P.O.Box 569 Santa Paula, CA 93061-0569 Attn:Director of Public Works Phone:(805)933-4212; Fax(805)525-3742 City of Simi Valley 2929 Tapo Canyon Road Simi Valley, CA 93063 Attn:Director of Public Works Phone:(805)583-6786; Fax(805)583-6300 City of Thousand Oaks 2100 Thousand Oaks Blvd. Thousand Oaks,CA 91362 Attn:Director of Public Works Phone: (805)449-2457;Fax(805)449-2475 17.ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This AGREEMENT contains the entire understanding of the Co-Permittees with respect to the matters contained herein, and supersedes any prior agreement or understanding,oral or written. 18.ASSIGNMENT: Each Co-Permittee has the right to assign its rights and obligations under this AGREEMENT only with the written consent of every other Co-Permittee, which consent may not be unreasonably withheld. 19. SUCCESSORS IN IN TEREST: Except as otherwise provided,this AGREEMENT will inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the successors and assigns of the parties. Except as expressly set forth herein,this AGREEMENT is not intended to benefit any person or entity not a party to this AGREEMENT. 7:9 158 20. SECTION HEADINGS: Headings at the beginning of each numbered section of this AGREEMENT are solely for the convenience of the parties and are not a part of this AGREEMENT. 21. SEVERABILITY: The invalidity in whole or in part of any provision of this AGREEMENT will not void or affect the validity of the other provisions of this AGREEMENT. 22.INTERPRETATION: The language in all parts of this AGREEMENT will be construed under the laws of the State of California according to its normal and usual meaning,and not strictly for or against any party. Exclusive venue for any action involving this AGREEMENT is in Ventura County. In the event of litigation in a United States District Court,exclusive venue is the Central District of California. 23.NO AGENCY CREATED: Nothing in this AGREEMENT is intended to create a separate entity or agency and no party to this AGREEMENT is the agent of any other party and nothing in this AGREEMENT will be construed as permitting or authorizing any party to this AGREEMENT to act in any capacity as an agent of the other except as expressly provided herein. Notwithstanding the foregoing,the parties acknowledge that they are entering into this AGREEMENT for their mutual benefit, and the parties agree to execute such further agreements and documents and take such further actions as may be reasonably necessary to implement this AGREEMENT. 24. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT: Each party covenants that each individual executing this AGREEMENT on behalf of such party is a person duly authorized and empowered to execute agreements for such party. 8-9 159 APPENDIX A: GUIDELINES FOR DETERMINING PRINCIPAL PERMITTEE ACTIVITIES Definition of Program Activities: Program Activities are permit required activities. Administration Convene,chair,provide agenda&minutes at Management and Sub-committee meetings Provide technical and administrative support necessary to implement the Permit. Prepare and track annual budget Serve as liaison between the Co-permittees and the RWQCB; • Set time schedules for the performance of activities; • Forward Co-permittee information to the RWQCB; • Arrange for public review,when needed; • Update Co-permittees on RWQCB and EPA regulations Distribute common information Membership and participation in SCCWRP and CASQA Secure services of consultants Benefit Assessment Program coordination Provide technical leadership Prepare regulatory response/comment letters Prepare and update special agreements Reortin: Prepare annual and monitoring reports File annual Co-permittee self-audits Prepare ROWD Seek Co-permittee review Prepare regulatory response letters for annual reports Monitorin Implement county-wide monitoring Coun ide Public Outreach Meet minimum Permit required PO elements 160 APPENDIX B: COUNTYWIDE STORMWATER PROGRAM MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE The NPDES Management Committee (COMMITTEE) is the principal forum for directing the countywide stormwater quality management program (PROGRAM) and is composed of twelve (12) members,one representative for each of the CITIES, COUNTY, and the DISTRICT. 1. The COMMITTEE Is chaired by the Principal Co-permittee and meets as needed (at least quarterly)to achieve permit requirements and assure PROGRAM continuity. 2. COMMIT TEE members and designated alternates shall be senior level and appointed by their Agency. 3. The COMMITTEE shall direct and guide the Program and review and approve the Program budget, comment letters, and report submittals to various agendas (i.e., monitoring reports, annual reports and comment letters sent to Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board. The COMMITTEE shall consider permit compliance, induding benefit as a primary objective in approving program tasks and corresponding budgets. 4. The COMMITTEE will review materials developed by the subcommittees, provide comments, and approve or reject program activities. 5. The LARWQCB may appoint a non-voting representative and alternate to the Management Committee. 1-1 161 7,7 July 14,2010 Version NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT VENTURA COUTYWIDE STORMWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM County of Ventura Signature Page IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the day and date below written. COUNTY OF VENTURA hair,Vito TE on,E- Date i � Board of Supervisorsu ATTEST: (-15F AMarty Robinson +0� ;?��44P1.*, *,y Clerk of the Board of Supervisors u �''' ' �T >, County of Ventura x0 ;. t`r\17. State of California 'QCtFov- / By: 1 �,i iepu y irk of the Board 111111 9-9 162 July 14,2010 Version NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT VENTURA COUTYWIDE STORMWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Ventura County Watershed Protection District Signature Page IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the day and date below written. VENTURA COUNTY WATERSHED PROTECTION DISTRICT -w. ;/0/:.• ...--y1 � 24D Lett 6 hair V¢,nTets+ittive-- Date Watershed Protection District Board of Supervisors ATTEST: prot cnoh o Marty Robinson .:. - a Clerk of the Board of Supervisors • /AZr=rt;-----'-� • County of Ventura ,..41sCrlin4wa!"47‘amtil State of Califomi. By: .�.•� 'Deputy Cler' the Board 9-9 163 NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT VENTURA COUNTYWIDE STORMWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM City of Port Hueneme Signature Page 4viyor City of Port Hueneme, California ATTEST: cag• elle Ascencion, utY City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mark H-nsley, City Att rney APPROVED • TO DMINISTRATION: •avid J. Norman, City Manager 9-9 • 164 Appendix A January 12,2011 Version NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM AMENDMENT TO IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT VENTURA COUTYWIDE STORMWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM City of Santa Paula Signature Page IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the day and date below written. CITY OF SANTA PAULA Lam---- Fred . Robinson, Mayor ATTEST: NNIA p :*'\ Ju. ice .' i .-rk ,e i">) APPR• / ► ' ' % FORM: yt" r,c'R( 1:71(,` e� (de 4 Karl H. Ber•- ' ity Attorney • APPR' ED AS TO CONTENT: e M. Fontes�',fC" Mav nager 9-9 11 165 July 14,2010 Version Agreement No. A-7357 CITY OF OXNARD K.__..-----.---- -i:1---te‹,- L---_ ________ Dr.Thomas E. Holden, or ATTEST: il . Daniel Martinez, i Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE il(6.-- E__A..1.,%(13J- C Alan Holmbe g, ity Attorney Ja 4Carneron,Chief Financial Officer APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: (..._47,--, ./..&.-&---c-_______.. Rob Roshanian, Interim Public Works Director 3 Anthony Emmert, Water Resources Manager 166 NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT VENTURA COUNTYWIDE STORMWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM City of Camarillo Signature Page .r�. S 10'0 „� Date Jerry Ba ston, City Manager City of Camarillo, California ATTEST: pANYLOLLTAMA effrie Madland, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of City Attorney Brian Pierik, City Attorney 16 7 Agreement No. 2010-58 July 14,2010 Version NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT VENTURA COUNTYWIDE STORMWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM City of Thousand Oaks Signature Page Dennis C. Gillette City of Thousand Oaks, California ATTEST: X4-4,--)WIZIA4141 Linda D. Lawrence, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of City Attorney Csto�Norman, Assistant City Attorney APPROVED AS TO ADMINISTRATION: Ccf.&.41. (51-10- yon Scott Mitnick, City Manager 9-9 City Council: 09/07/2010 16 8 Contract No. 9447-2010 NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT VENTURA COUNTYWIDE STORMWATER IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM City of Simi Valley Signature Page (:C::::„. .,e._ .. Paul Miller, or City of Simi Valley, California A rrEST: Wendy K. Green,Assistant City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: . Office of City Attorney ra�yM oo�N ty Atto�� m APPROVED nAS TO CONTENT: Mike Sedell, City Manager Sa --= - Ro;• d K. uchi, aki, Director Department of Public Works SCVSW\IMP AGREE12010IMP AGREEMENT\tA7-14-10 169 NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT, VENTURA COUNTYWIDE STORMWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM City of Moorpark Signature Page IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the day and date first above written. CITY OF MOORPARK / a - e S. Parvin, Mayor Date ity of Moorpark, California ATTEST: Deborah S. Traffenstedt, Clerk ox OVA 170 July 14,2010 Version NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT VENTURA COUNTYWIDE STORMWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM SIGNATURE PAGE CITY OF FILLMORE, By: jOlijiL L IJLd4L1(/l Patti Walker,Mayor A 11 EST: By: Q4a.✓ , 1� Clay 174s-ding, City Cle APPROVED AS •• FORM: By: The•dollir J. c eider, City Attorney 1:\ENGR\PW 10\1003 NPDES COUNTYWIDE IA.doc 9-9 171 City of San Buenaventura Signature Page CITY OF SAN BUENAVENTURA Let:eic Rick Cole, City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM 7/(7 /tt-t ? Ariel Pierre Calonne City Attorney 172 July 14,2010 Version 20. SECTION HEADINGS: Headings at the beginning of each numbered section of this AGREEMENT are solely for the convenience of the parties and are not a part of this AGREEMENT. 21. SEVERABILITY: The invalidity in whole or in part of any provision of this AGREEMENT will not void or affect the validity of the other provisions of this AGREEMENT. 22. INTERPRETATION: The language in all parts of this AGREEMENT will be construed under the laws of the State of California according to its normal and usual meaning,and not strictly for or against any party. Exclusive venue for any action involving this AGREEMENT is in Ventura County. In the event of litigation in a United States District Court,exclusive venue is the Central District of California. 23. NO AGENCY CREATED: Nothing in this AGREEMENT is intended to create a separate entity or agency and no party to this AGREEMENT is the agent of any other party and nothing in this AGREEMENT will be construed as permitting or authorizing any party to this AGREEMENT to act in any capacity as an agent of the other except as expressly provided herein. Notwithstanding the foregoing,the parties acknowledge that they are entering into this AGREEMENT for their mutual benefit, and the parties agree to execute such further agreements and documents and take such further actions as may be reasonably necessary to implement this AGREEMENT. 24. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE AGREEMENT: Each party covenants that each individual executing this AGREEMENT on behalf of such party is a person duly authorized and empowered to execute agreements for such party. [An executed signature page must be provided by each signatory.] City of Ojai S Baker, Interim City Manager ATTEST: i/./T /L410 C thia Bure11, City Clerk ity of Ojai 8-8 173