Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2012 1219 CCSA REG ITEM 09H ITEM 9.H. MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL. - AGENDA REPORT � ` v23 � TO: Honorable City Council FROM: David A. Bobardt, Community Development Director DATE: December 6, 2012 (CC Meeting of 12/19/2012) SUBJECT: Consider National Park Service Rim of the Valley Corridor Special Resource Study Preliminary Findings and Alternative Concepts BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION On December 5, 2012, Councilmember Mikos requested an agenda item for this meeting to discuss the National Park Services Rim of the Valley Corridor Special Resource Study Preliminary Findings and Alternative Concepts, for which comments are due on January 7, 2013. In 2008 Congress directed the National Park Service to conduct a special resource study of the area known as the Rim of the Valley Corridor, generally including the mountains encircling the San Fernando, La Crescenta, Santa Clarita, Simi and Conejo Valleys in California. The study area may ultimately include portions of Moorpark east of the 23, continuing to include Happy Camp Canyon Regional Park, depending upon which alternatives are selected for further study. The end product of this effort will be a report to Congress to determine whether any portion of the Rim of the Valley Corridor area is eligible to be designated as a unit of the National Park System or added to an existing National Park Unit such as the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area (SMMNRA). The study will also explore other ways that private and governmental entities can protect resources and provide more outdoor recreation opportunities. The Park Service has recently released its preliminary findings and alternative concepts for this study (attached) and has been conducting public workshops and soliciting comments on these findings and alternatives. The alternatives identified in this report are as follows: Alternative A — Continuation of Current Management— (No Action) Alternative B — Cooperative Conservation Partnership — (Partnership with Public and Private Landowners and Other Stakeholders) Alternative C — Connecting Urban Parks (Expanding SMMNRA Boundary to Surround San Fernando Valley) SACommunity Development\OTHER AGENCIES\National Park Service\20121219 NPS Rim of the Valley Corridor.docx 201 Honorable City Council December 19, 2012 Page 2 Alternative D— Connecting Natural Habitat (Expanding SMMNRA Boundary to surround Simi and Conejo Valleys to connect wildlife corridors between the Santa Monica and Sierra Madre Mountains) National Park Service staff held a workshop at the Moorpark Community Center on November 29, 2012 from 7:00 PM to just after 9:00 PM as part of its outreach efforts. Approximately 32 people attended the meeting. Many questions and comments focused on concerns about impacts on property rights, government intrusion, cost in public funds, and eminent domain. About six comments favored expansion of the park boundary as described in Alt. D. There were also questions and comments favoring improving wildlife corridors by including connectivity to the Los Padres and Angeles National Forests. On December 3, 2012, the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy considered these findings and alternatives and authorized staff to submit a comment letter identifying an additional alternative for study that combines the areas in Alternatives C and D and adds an additional cooperative conservation partnership area. Reasons for this additional alternative are included in the attached comment letter. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Direct staff as deemed appropriate. Attachments: 1. Preliminary Findings and Alternative Concepts 2. Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy Draft Comment Letter 202 Rim of the Valley Corridor Special Resource Study Department goo Preliminary Findings & Alternative Concepts What's Inside... Study Process p.2 An overview of the study legislation and process Study Schedule p.3 An outline of the study timeline How to comment and stay involved p.3 Information about how to provide your input and stay engaged throughout the study process Newsletter#3 Fall 1 Findings pp.4-10 Preliminary findings on significance, ��a� IP�V(O�Se suitability, feasibility, and boundary We are happy to report our progress on the Rim of the Val- on pages 11-19. These preliminary alternative concepts adjustment ley Corridor Special Resource Study and we invite your feed- introduce a range of possible management strategies and Alternative Concepts pp.11-19 back on the preliminary ideas presented in this newsletter. serve as a starting point for discussion. Which elements of An overview of the four preliminary alternatives Since you last heard from us, we have been evaluating the each of these concepts do you like or dislike? Is there a bet- study area to determine whether it contains nationally signif- ter combination of management strategies that would cost- Meeting schedule p.20 icant resources that are suitable and feasible for inclusion in effectively enhance protection of the resources? Are there Information about upcoming public meetings the national park system as a separate park unit or as an ad- any new management strategies that you would like to see Contact information p.20 dition to Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area included in the draft study report? Information about how to contact the study SMMNRA). We have completed our preliminary analysis and team want to share our findings with you. Your feedback at this Please join us at one of several public meetings to be held stage will help us complete our analysis and create a range in the area this fall to discuss the preliminary findings and of feasible alternatives for the draft study report. alternative concepts. We invite you to visit our website at San Gabriel Watershed and www.nps.gov/pwro/rimofthevalley to learn about the differ- Mountains Study update You can find a summary of the preliminary study findings on ent ways you can send us your comments. You may also The NPS continues to make progress on pages 4-10 of this newsletter. Do you agree with our find- contact us directly via phone, mail or e-mail using the infor- completing the San Gabriel Watershed ings? Does the analysis adequately address the criteria for mation on the back of this newsletter. Please send us your and Mountains Special Resource Study. a new park unit and the criteria for a SMMNRA boundary comments by January 7, 2013. The final study will be made available to adjustment summarized on page 10? Have we overlooked the public when it has been transmit- ted to Congress, For more information anything? We look forward to hearing from you! about the completion of this study, please visit the study website: http:// Based on our preliminary findings, we begin the public dia- www.n s ov/ wro/San a logue on the role of the NPS in protecting these resources CC ATTACHMENT 1 51VI�V��t�, p 9 p g briel/. Tlico 5�voly Team Study Process i . View of downtown Los Angeles from Griffith Park Photo:NPS. Study Legislation visitor enjoyment;2) can be administered at a reasonable cost;and 3)requires direct The Consolidated Natural Resources Act of 20o8(P.L.110-229—May 20o8) directed NPS management,instead of protection by other public agencies or the private sec- the National Park Service(NPS)to conduct a special resource study of the area tor.A range of"preliminary alternative concepts"for this study is presented in this known as the Rim of the Valley Corridor,generally including the mountains encir- newsletter beginning on page 11.The"preliminary alternative concepts"are initial cling the San Fernando,La Crescenta,Santa Clarita,Simi,and Conejo Valleys in ideas for the management of significant resources and public enjoyment opportuni- California. The legislation also directed the NPS to determine whether any portion ties in the study area.With your input,the planning team will refine and further de- of the Rim of the Valley Corridor study area is eligible to be designated as a unit of velop these alternatives for evaluation in the draft study report. the national park system or added to an existing national park unit(Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area);and to explore other ways that private and Next Steps governmental entities can protect resources and provide more outdoor recreation After analyzing the public comments on the preliminary study findings and alterna- opportunities. tives,the team will develop more detailed alternatives and complete further feasibil- ity and environmental analysis of the alternatives.Next,a draft study report that Start Up of Study includes the alternatives and environmental analysis will be published and provided The NPS introduced the Rim of the Valley Corridor special resource study and for public comment.Based on these comments,the report will be revised as ap- boundary analysis in 2010 through a newsletter and meetings with organizations, propriate.Added to the final report will be a determination of the alternative that in agencies,elected officials,and the public.More than 400 people attended public the professional judgment of the Director of the NPS would be most effective and workshops and the study team received more than 2000 written comments on the efficient in protecting significant resources and providing for public enjoyment.The study approach,important resources that should be included in the study,the po- final step in the process is transmittal of the final report from the Secretary of the In- tential impacts of the study,the scope and size of the study area,and the range of terior to Congress,along with a recommendation regarding the Secretary's preferred possible study outcomes.A summary of these comments can be seen on the study management option for the area. website. Location LOS PADRES ANGELES Resource Analysis NATIONAL FOREST FOREST Beginning with the resource information provided by the public and agency corn- s wta Bait,,,; ANGELES ments,the study team gathered existing documentation about potentially significant ATIONAL natural and cultural resources throughout the study area.These preliminary findings ad FOREST are summarized beginning on page 4 of this newsletter. _ LosAhge/es % Alternatives Rim of the Valley Corridor In a special resource study,"alternatives"are possible ways of managing resources Special Resource Study Area within the study area.As part of the study process,all of the alternatives presented r') must be assessed for feasibility.Management by the NPS will be considered only if: 1)an area has adequate size and configuration to allow for resource protection and o , to zo , Jo Miles 2 Rim of the Vallev Corridor Special Resource Studv • Newsletter#3 • Fall 2012 Study Schedule Planning Activity Dates We Would Like to Hear from You! As you read through this newsletter and consider the alter- 2010- 2011 1 Public Start-up/Scoping native concepts, think about which ideas you like the most Determine the "scope" or overall approach to the study. Host public meetings. Col- and which would best improve recreational opportunities lect and analyze public comments. and protect natural and cultural resources. Your written 2 Resource Analysis: Significance and Suitability 2011 - 2012 comments are welcomed and encouraged. Please consider Identify nationally significant resources (outstanding examples of particular type of the questions below in addition to any other thoughts and resource). The NPS considers a resource to be suitable for inclusion in the national ideas you wish to share. Receiving your input by January park system if it: 1) is not already adequately represented in the national park sys- 7, 2013 will allow us to learn from you and revise our ap- tem, or 2) is not comparably represented and protected for public enjoyment by proach as we develop the draft study report. another land managing entity. • Is there one alternative concept or idea presented For boundary adjustments to existing NPS units, the NPS evaluates whether an ad- that you think is most valuable in terms of improving justment to the boundary would protect significant resources or enhance opportuni- recreational opportunities and protecting significant ties for public enjoyment related to park purposes. resources? Tell us why you think this idea is valuable. 3-4 Alternatives Development& Feasibility Analysis 2012 What suggestions do you have for strengthening or Identify feasible roles for the NPS and develop alternative concepts. You are invited improving the alternative concepts? Do you have an to help refine and develop these concepts through written comments and participa- We Are Here entirely different vision of how the area should be tion in public meetings. All of the alternatives must be considered feasible for NPS managed? If so, please describe your vision. management. For example they must be of adequate size and configuration to pro- tect the resources, must be able to be administered at a reasonable cost, and must What concerns do you have about the alternative con- have public support. cepts? 5 Environmental Impact Analysis • What are your thoughts or comments on the prelimi- Through a National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA) process, the NPS will analyze 2013 nary study findings? the potential for environmental and socioeconomic impacts of the alternatives. Please share your thoughts and comments by attending a 6 Draft Report 2014 public meeting or by submitting your comments electroni- The NPS will publish the findings of the study(analysis of resource significance, cally by e-mail (pwr_rimofthevalley@nps.gov) or through suitability, feasibility, relationship to purpose of the existing park, and need for NPS the study web site (www.nps.gov/pwro/rimofthevalley). management), proposed alternatives, and environmental impact analysis. You can also mail your comments to the physical address The Draft Report will contain a more detailed description and analysis of the area's on the back of this newsletter. resources and alternatives for the protection of significant resources and the en- hancement of recreational opportunities. You will have an opportunity to comment How to Stay Involved on this draft before the report is finalized. The NPS will host public meetings and Learn about the resource stud special solicit public comments on the draft report. p y process: • Visit the study web site: http://www.nps.gov/pwro/ 7 Final Report/Transmittal to Congress 2014 rimofthevalley The final report includes a recommendation for a preferred management option for • Sign up for the study mailing list or e-mail list CD the area. If NPS involvement is recommended, implementation would require further • Participate in one of the public meetings listed on the CD cn Congressional action. back page of this newsletter Rim of the Valley Corridor Special Resource Studv • Newsletter#3 Fall 7n1 2 Preliminary Study Findings View of downtown Los Angeles and Elysian Park from the Verdugo Mountains Photo: NPS. The study process includes two separate,parallel analyses,one that focuses on SMMNRA Boundary Evaluation the potential creation of a new unit of the national park system;and a second This study also evaluates the potential of including all or a portion of the study area that focuses on potential adjustment of the existing boundary of Santa Monica as part of SMMNRA through an extension of the SMMNRA boundary. Mountains National Recreation Area(SMMNRA). It should be noted that there is a certain amount of overlap between the criteria for a new park unit and the criteria For the Secretary of the Interior to recommend any portion of the Rim of the Valley for a boundary adjustment.Both sets of criteria require proposals to be feasible and Corridor study area as an addition to SMMNRA,the area must meet one of the demonstrate a need for direct NPS management over management by other entities. following criteria(NPS Management Policies 20o6): New Park Unit Evaluation Protect significant resources and values or enhance opportunities for public This special resource study evaluates the Rim of the Valley Corridor Study enjoyment related to park purposes;or Area as a potential new unit of the national park system based on established Address operational and management issues,such as the need for access or the need for boundaries to correspond to logical boundary delineations such as criteria. A proposed addition to the national park system will receive a favorable topographic or other natural features or roads;or recommendation from the NPS only if it meets all of the following four criteria for Otherwise protect park resources that are critical to fulfilling park purposes. inclusion (NPS Management Policies 20o6): 1. it possesses nationally significant natural or cultural resources; The addition needs to: a. it is a suitable addition to the system; Be a feasible addition to the National Park System—the criteria is the same as 3. it is a feasible addition to the system;and the feasibility criteria for special resource studies listed above;and q,. it requires direct NPS management,instead of alternative protection by • other public agencies or the private sector. Require direct NPS management that cannot or will not be accomplished by m another government entity or by the private sector. rn A o;.,.,..F+kl r—irinr Cnori�l Rocnt irro Cti 0xi 9 NPMKIPttPr 4� . Fall 7012 L_ Areas previously determined to be a Map to the left:Two geographic areas within the Rim of the Valley Corridor nationally significant t `' study area have previously been - Areas determined nationally found by the NPS to contain nationally significant through the Rim of the ! X - is significant resources:the Santa Monica Valley Corridor Special Resource Study Mountains National Recreation Area and � at.�,.' A. the San Gabriel Mountains. Santa Susana Mountains (Angeles National Forest) Simi Hills Conejo`�--t Verdu o Mountains Mountain Area g San Gabriel Santa Monica Mountains Foothills Los Angeles 6 River/Arroyo Seco Special Resource Study Criteria Preliminary Findings benefits." Through the San Gabriel Watershed and Mountains Special Resource (New Park Unit) Study process,the NPS has determined the San Gabriel Mountains to be of national significance for its geologic resources and high biodiversity. The Rim of the Valley National Significance - Does the study area contain nationally significant Corridor study is not revisiting the significance of these two areas.However,the resources? previously identified nationally significant resources are incorporated into the Two geographic areas within the Rim of the Valley Corridor study area have summary provided below. previously been found by the NPS to contain nationally significant resources:Santa The remaining portions of the Rim of the Valley Corridor study area are being Monica Mountains National Recreation Area(SMMNRA),and the San Gabriel Mountains. evaluated through this study to determine the extent of nationally significant resources. The NPS preliminary findings indicate that the remainder of the study The purpose and national significance of SMMNRA was established by Congress area contains nationally significant resources,including outstanding examples of through its enabling legislation(Public Law 95-625).It recognizes the Santa Monica geologic and paleontological resources,high biodiversity,as well as a culturally rich,long history of human use.The following summary describes how the study N Mountains and adjacent coastline as an area of national significance because of area resources,including the Santa Monica and San Gabriel Mountains,meet the CO its combination of natural,cultural,recreational,and aesthetic resources,and further states that,"... there is a national interest in protecting and preserving these national significance criteria. Rim of the Valley Corridor Special Resource Studv • Newsletter#3 • Fall 2012 5 NATIONALLY SIGNIFICANT NATURAL RESOURCES High Levels of Biodiversity The Rim of the Valley Corridor study area provides SMMNRA protects for the American people the greatest outstanding examples of geologic history including the expanse of mainland Mediterranean ecosystems(biomes) evolution of the Transverse Ranges Province and a diversity of in the national park system. With high concentrations both marine and terrestrial,well-preserved,paleontological of rare,sensitive,and endemic species,it is among the resources.The study area contains a high level of biodiversity world's rarest and most endangered land types,one that including outstanding examples of native grasslands,coastal occurs in only five locations throughout the world. sage scrub,chaparral,dry coniferous forests,and alluvial fan The topographically and geologically diverse San sage scrub. Gabriel Mountains contain high levels of biodiversity. Outstanding examples of rare southern California Mountain Building and Diverse Geology Associated with the communities in the western San Gabriel Mountains and 4� . Transverse Ranges Province foothills include:alluvial fan sage scrub,big-cone Douglas a Volcanic and dolomite formations in the Santa Monica fir,coastal sage scrub,and riparian areas. Mountains,Conejo Mountain area and the Simi Hills The Simi Hills and Santa Susana Mountains contain were used in the historically significant paleo-magnetic outstandin g examples of native southern California P testing that confirmed the go degree rotation of the habitat which support a number of special status species I Transverse Ranges Province. considered rare,threatened or endangered. g he San Gabriel Mountains are among the fastest growing _ One of the most outstanding examples of native P 1 � a mountains in the world-as much as 2 inches a year-thus grasslands in southern California occurs at Laskey serving as an excellent location to learn about mountain Mesa in the Simi Hills.The unique loamy soil hosts building. The Santa Susana Mountains, one the youngest native bunchgrasses and habitat for the rare San mountain systems on the west coast,further contribute to Fernando Valley spineflower. understanding active mountain building in the region. - The Santa Susana Mountains contain outstanding • One of the most geologically diverse mountain ranges examples of oak woodlands and savannas and a relict in southern California,the San Gabriel Mountains are Pleistocene big-cone Douglas fir forest. comprised of rocks representing every major geologic era, The Verdugo Mountains function as an island refuge including some of the oldest rocks(over i billion years providing an important link between nationally significant old)on the west coast of the United States. plant and animal populations in the San Gabriel and Santa Monica Mountains.The genetic interchange of species Paleontology between these two mountain ranges provides significant • SMMNRA contains one of the most extensive and opportunities for scientific study. diverse assemblages of fossil material known in the national park system.There are at least 2,30o known fossil The Upper Santa Clara River contains some of the highest localities,representing over a dozen fossiliferous geologic quality,least disturbed and biotically intact acreage of big- cone Douglas fir-canyon oak forest,riparian forest and Top photo: Diverse geologic formations cre- formations. ate scenic vistas throughout the Rim of the woodland,coastal sage scrub,and alluvial fan sage scrub. Valley Corridor. Center photo: SMMNRA The Simi Hills,Santa Susana Mountains,and the foothills Invertebrate species diversity is very high,with over 2,500 contains one of the most extensive and di- of the San Gabriel Mountains also contain significant verse assemblages of fossil material known species. m in the national park system. Bottom photo: fossiliferous formations,some of which are not currently 00 The San Fernando Valley spineflower,once represented in the Santa Monica Mountains. believed extinct,occurs in the study area. All photos NPS. a • NPWsIPtter#3 • Fall 2012 NATIONALLY SIGNIFICANT CULTURAL RESOURCES Well No.q,Pico Canyon Oil Field(NHL)in the Santa The Rim of the Valley Corridor study area contains nationally Susana Mountains,was the first commercially successful significant cultural resources including archeological sites and oil well in California. national historic landmarks related to cultural themes such as Continued use of the Santa Monica Mountains for film expanding science and technology,expressing cultural values, production preserves a 75-year tradition that continues to - and development of the American economy. hold the world's fascination.Paramount Ranch is held by some historians to be the nation's best remaining example • The collection of prehistoric and historic archeological of a film production facility from Hollywood's`Golden sites related to over io,000 years of human habitation is Era' of Motion Pictures. significant.More than i000 known archeological sites The study area reflects a wide range of properties exist within SMMNRA.Outside of SMMNRA over 500 associated with significant examples of architecture, sites have been evaluated.The potential for scientific landscape architecture,and urban design.The Eames identification and study of additional sites in the study House(NHL)in Pacific Palisades is one of the few area is high. architectural works attributed to Charles Eames,and • Excellent examples of Chumash rock art are found embodies many of the distinguishing characteristics and within SMMNRA.The Saddle Rock Ranch Pictograph ideals of postwar Modernism in the United States.The Site(NHL eligible),also known as the "Cave of the Four Gamble House(NHL)is the most complete and best Horsemen,"is a Native American rock art and settlement preserved example of the work of the architects Greene site located in the Santa Monica Mountains.It includes &Greene and embodies the highest level of the California the only depictions in Chumash art of human figures in Bungalow style associated with the Arts and Crafts profile and of mounted horsemen. movement of the early 2oth century. % • National historic landmarks(NHLs)within the study The Pasadena Rose Bowl(NHL)is of outstanding area have contributed major advances in science and significance in the field of recreation as the site of the technology including: oldest and most renowned post-season college football - The Mount Wilson Observatory in the Angeles "bowl"game,held annually every New Year's in the Rose Top photo: The Space Flight Operations Fa- National Forest(NHL eligible)includes five Bowl since the structure's completion in 1922. cility(NHL)at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory continues to be used as the primary NASA historically significant telescopes which laid the center for unmanned space exploration. technological foundation for all large modern Potential National Significance-Additional Research and Bottom photo: The Twenty five foot Simula- tor(NHL)at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory is telescopes. Analysis Needed the only NASA facility capable of producing - The Space Flight Operations Facility(NHL) In addition to the nationally significant resources described high quality space simulation for testing associated with the Jet Propulsion Laboratory near above,there are cultural resources that may be nationally spacecraft.All photos NPS. Pasadena has served as the primary NASA center for significant,but require more research and analysis beyond the unmanned exploration of the planets. the scope of this study.Those resources include Chumash - The Twenty five foot Simulator(NHL),also located rock art and archeological sites outside of SMMNRA,Santa on the campus of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,is Susana Field Laboratory historic districts and properties,and the only NASA facility capable of producing high- the four-level interchange associated with the completion quality space simulation for testing spacecraft under of the Arroyo Seco Parkway.The Butterfield Overland Trail conditions of extreme cold;high vacuum;and intense, also traverses the study area and is currently being evaluated CDhighly uniform,solar radiation. through another NPS study which will determine its significance. Rim of the Valley Corridor Special Resource Study Newsletter#3 Fall 2012 7 Suitability Findings - Could the area help fill a Feasibility and Need for NPS Management crucial gap in the national park system? Findings - Could the area be efficiently and effectively managed by the National Park Service? An area is considered suitable for addition to the national park system if it represents a natural or cultural resource type that To be feasible as a new unit of the national park system, is not already adequately represented in the national park an area must be(1) of sufficient size and appropriate system,or is not comparably represented and protected for configuration to ensure sustainable resource protection and public enjoyment by other federal agencies;tribal,state,or visitor enjoyment(taking into account current and potential local governments;or the private sector. impacts from sources beyond proposed park boundaries),and (2)capable of efficient administration by the National Park Based upon evaluation of the study area resources and their Service(NPS)at a reasonable cost. relative quality,character,and rarity,the study area primarily contains nationally significant resources already represented in The NPS finds that the creation of a new national park unit SMMNRA including geologic features used in the studies that is not feasible due to cost and operational efficiencies. Many confirmed the go degree rotation of the Transverse Ranges of the significant resources within the study area expand on Province,paleontological resources,and habitat essential for the national significance of SMMNRA and provide habitat wildlife movement.Conservation of these resources would connectivity essential for the long-term productivity of the expand and enhance the significance of SMMNRA and significant resources within the Santa Monica Mountains thus provide new opportunities for scientific study. warranting physical connection to the SMMNRA boundary and a seamless management approach.A separate unit would t x The study area also contains nationally significant natural also be more costly than expanding existing park operations. and cultural resources that are not currently represented The feasibility of a boundary adjustment to SMMNRA is Top photo: Study area natural resources in SMMNRA or the broader national park system.In the discussed on the next page. include some not represented in SMMNRA, San Gabriel Mountains this includes geologic diversity and such as native grasslands and oak woodland savanna. Bottom photo: Well No.4,P excellent examples of alluvial fan sag e scrub habitat.In the Because a new park unit is found not to be feasible,the need i co P Canyon oil Field(NHL)was the first commer- Simi Hills and Santa Susana Mountains examples of native for direct NPS management of a park designation need not be cially successful oil well in California and rep- grasslands,oak woodlands and savannas and national historic evaluated. resents a resource not currently represented in SMMNRA. Pictured is the two-story hotel landmarks related to advancements in astronomy and space photos erected 80 for use by the oil men.All exploration,and the first commercially successful oil well in Special Resource Study Criteria (New Park Unit) the west are not currently represented in the national park Preliminary Conclusion system. The NPS finds that the Rim of the Valley Corridor Study Area contains nationally significant resources suitable for inclusion in the national park system.However,the study area is found not to be feasible as a new national park unit(separate from SMMNRA).Inclusion of study area resources in a boundary adjustment to SMMNRA would be more cost effective and provide for greater operational efficiency(see boundary adjustment analysis). N r m 8 Rim of the Valley Corridor Special Resource Study Newsletter#3 Fall 2012 Boundary Adjustment Criteria NPS management is still being evaluated. Comments on the (Additions to SMMNRA) preliminary alternative concepts presented in this newsletter will help the NPS to make this determination. Criteria Analysis The NPS finds that the Rim of the Valley Corridor study Boundary Adjustment Preliminary Conclusion area contains nationally significant resources.Boundary The NPS finds that the addition of lands in the study area adjustments within the Rim of the Valley Corridor study to SMMNRA would contribute to protection of significant area would provide more opportunities to ensure long- resources and expand opportunities for public enjoyment. term protection of nationally significant plants and wildlife associated with SMMNRA and would expand public enjoyment opportunities for the Los Angeles metropolitan region.Two boundary adjustment alternatives are described in this newsletter;one emphasizes a boundary adjustment focused on enhancing opportunities to reach a broad range of urban audiences;while the other emphasizes protection of ecological connectivity. Feasibility and Need for Direct NPS Management Findings The NPS finds that an adjustment to the boundary of SMMNRA is feasible using the existing collaborative partnership-based park model exemplified by SMMNRA, which respects the complex mix of land use,ownership, and regulatory authorities.Through a boundary adjustment the NPS and partners would have enhanced opportunities for collaborative management with local,state and federal managers to protect natural and cultural resources,provide recreation,and offer interpretation and educational programs. While some of the lands in the Rim of the Valley Corridor study area are protected for conservation and recreation by other land management agencies and conservation organizations,inclusion of additional areas in the SMMNRA boundary would provide the opportunity for interagency coordination to achieve recreation and conservation goals and provides the NPS with the authority to more fully invest in conservation,planning,and public enjoyment of the area.The NPS could enter into cooperative management agreements with existing agencies and seek funds for targeted Boundary adjustments within the Rim of the Valley Corridor study area would provide more opportunities to ensure land acquisition from willing sellers.The need for direct long-term protection of nationally significant plants and wildlife associated with the SMMNRA. Photo:NPS. N f+ F+ Rim of the Valley Corridor Special Resource Study • Newsletter#3 • Fall 2012 9 Special • Study Preliminary Findings Boundary • Findings • Significance: Are there nationally significant resources in the Yes study area? Boundary Adjustment Evaluation: Would portions of the Rim of the Yes • The NPS determined that the remainder of the study area Valley Corridor study area protect significant resources, enhance op- contains nationally significant resources, including outstand- portunities for public enjoyment, address operation and management ing examples of geologic resources, paleontological resources, issues, or otherwise protect resources critical to fulfilling the purposes of biodiversity, as well as a culturally rich, long history of human SMMNRA? use as evidenced by nationally significant cultural resources. Boundary adjustments within the Rim of the Valley Corridor study Suitability: Could the area help fill a crucial gap in the national Partially area could: park system? 1. provide more opportunities to ensure long-term protection of • Study area primarily contains nationally significant resources nationally significant resources associated with SMMNRA by ex- already represented in SMMNRA, a unit of the national park panding NPS opportunities to preserve ecological connectivity, system 2. provide an opportunity for the NPS to provide interpretation • Study area also contains suitable nationally significant re- and education on natural and cultural themes not currently rep- sources (resources suitable for a new park unit) not currently resented in the national park system, and represented in SMMNRA or the broader national park system. 3. expand recreational opportunities for Los Angeles area commu- Feasibility: Could the area be efficiently and effectively managed No nities, some of which are currently deficient in access to parks by the National Park Service? and recreation. • Creation of a new national park unit is not feasible due to Feasibility: Could portions of the study area be a feasible addition to Yes cost and operational efficiencies. SMMNRA? Need for Direct NPS Management: Does the area require direct Not Consideration of a boundary adjustment to add portions of the NPS management, instead of alternative protection by other pub- applicable study area to SMMNRA is feasible using the existing collaborative lic agencies or the private sector? partnership-based park model exemplified by SMMNRA, which • This criterion was not evaluated for consideration of a new respects the complex mix of land use, ownership, and regulatory park unit. authority. Need for Direct NPS Management: Does the area require direct NPS TBD* management, instead of alternative protection by other public agencies or the private sector? • The need for direct NPS management is still being evaluated. Com- ments on the preliminary alternative concepts presented in this nes- letter will help the NPS make this determination * To be determined t�49111111illik& 9 N •", 6 10 Rim of the Valley Corridor Special Resource Study Newsletter#3 Fall 2012 Introduction to the Preliminary Alternative Concepts Coastal sage scrub and woodlands in the Santa Susana Mountains. Photo:NPS. The preliminary alternative concepts presented in this newsletter were developed emphasis on creating better connections for a broad range of urban audiences in cooperation with multiple land management agencies after an analysis of public including many who are under-represented in national parks and underserved comments,natural and cultural resource issues,and resource significance.These by state and local parks. preliminary concepts illustrate different ways of providing protection and public D: Connecting Natural Habitat: SMMNRA Boundary Adjustment: This enjoyment of resources that have been identified as potentially nationally significant action alternative recommends a boundary adjustment for SMMNRA to through our draft analysis summarized on pages 5-io. The common focus of the encompass key land linkages and core habitats between SMMNRA,the Los preliminary alternatives is an emphasis on cooperative management of existing Padres National Forest,the Angeles National Forest,and state and local habitat public lands.Based on the preliminary feasibility findings of the study,none of areas to promote long term resiliency of the natural resources within the these alternative concepts includes a recommendation for a new national park unit. existing SMMNRA boundary. Each preliminary alternative concept could stand independently or components of different alternatives could be combined into new ideas. The concepts presented in Items Common to All Preliminary Action Alternatives this newsletter demonstrate a wide variety of solutions and serve as a starting point The preliminary alternative concepts include several actions that are common to all for discusssion and public input. of them,including the following: Four different preliminary alternative concepts are included,the first of which is The Angeles National Forest would continue to be managed by the USFS. a"no action"alternative. In addition,three"action alternatives"present different approaches for management including boundary adjustments to SMMNRA and NPS and the USFS would work cooperatively through the Service First new partnership initiatives. Each of the action alternatives seeks to enhance the authority on initiatives to protect resources and conduct public outreach. capabilities of existing agencies by leveraging resources,sharing information,and Boundary additions to SMMNRA would not establish additional regulatory cooperative planning. authority or land use authorities over local governments included.NPS land • A: Continuation of Current Management: This "no action" alternative management policies would only apply to lands that the NPS acquires. focuses on existing management and authorities. The NPS would support completion of the Rim of the Valley Trail through partnerships and technical assistance. • B: Cooperative Conservation Partnership: This action alternative concentrates on partnership development to foster cooperative planning SMMNRA would work with partners to develop a collaborative geographic and funding tools to meet the demands of a growing urban population while database to support decision making in this area. Universities and other meeting common resource protection goals. partners would be engaged to assist in building scientific knowledge to support decision-making. • C: Connecting Urban Communities: SMMNRA Boundary Adjustment: ND This action alternative recommends a boundary adjustment for SMMNRA Once established,the Rim of the Valley Trail would be eligible for designation as w to provide more recreation opportunities and ecological connections with an a National Recreation Trail,through the existing application process,which is voluntary and initiated by trail managers. Rim of the Valley Corridor Special Resource Study • Newsletter#3 • Fall 2012 11 1 Alternative A N Angeles National Forest N Los Padres o ,0 National Forest °; �1 ,1 �r r Banta r Uarita Angeles National Forest �Irrts v•tilr:r�,; ,tl8°�..- I _w ' I Camarillo r� Con& � San Fernando Valley "�» Valle " x Pasadena I ,r Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area _ Santa Los Angeles Malibu Monica Rim of the Valley Corridor Area 0 5 10 N Miles I I . ��--��---11 Santa Monica Mountains ' National Recreation Area 1A National Park Service.SMMNRA GIB r Proposed Rim of the Valley Trail Updated August 16.2012 ry The NPS makes no warranty,express or Implied. Existing Parks and Protected Areas related to the accuracy or content of this map. Sources: Existing Parks-CPAD 1.7.September 2011((Greenlnfo Network, www.calands.org)&Property Database 2011(SMMC/tuIRCA):Proposed Alternatives and Study Area(NPS),Roads-StreetMap Pro 2007(ESRI) 12 Rim of the Valley Corridor Special Resource Study Newsletter#3 • Fall 2012 Alternative A: Continuation of Current Management (No Action) Concept tance programs such as Land and Water Conservation Fund(LWCF)grant program, The"no action"alternative is required by the National Environmental Policy Act the Rivers,Trails and Conservation Assistance Program(RTCA),and the National (NEPA)to provide a baseline from which to compare alternatives. Under the no Historic Landmark(NHL)program within the existing authorities and policies of action alternative,the NPS would have no role in the study area beyond existing these programs. national park units(i.e.SMMNRA,Juan Bautista de Anza National Historic Trail [NHT])and existing financial and technical assistance programs such as Land Resources would continue to be managed by existing federal,state,and local agen- and Water Conservation Fund(LWCF)grant program,the Rivers,Trails and cies,nonprofit organizations,and private property owners. Coordination among Conservation Assistance Program(RTCA),and the National Historic Landmark agencies to protect wildlife habitat and corridors would continue to occur on a case- (NHL)program. This alternative assumes that the current programs and policies of by-case basis. existing federal,state,local and non-profit organizations would continue at existing levels and current conditions and trends would continue. Public Enjoyment The NPS would continue current outreach and other related programmatic efforts Management to engage urban communities in the Rim of the Valley area. Existing agencies and SMMNRA would continue to be managed according to its authorized purpose organizations would continue to provide recreational opportunities for the public. to protect and preserve the significant scenic,recreational,educational,scientific, Recreational access would continue to be limited for some portions of the study natural,archeological,and public health benefits provided by the Santa Monica area. Mountains and adjacent coastline area for the residents of and visitors to the area. There would be no new NPS role in the Rim of the Valley Corridor area. Any NPS Rim of the Valley Trail management activities in areas beyond the current park boundary would be limited Various agencies and organizations would continue to develop proposed segments to projects that further SMMNRA's defined purpose. Otherwise,management of the Rim of the Valley Trail. Accordingly,the NPS would continue to plan and of areas beyond the current park boundary would continue to be conducted by implement portions of the trail that traverse park boundaries as funds become existing landowners and managers. available.NPS technical assistance in completion of the full trail would be limited to existing technical assistance and grant programs. Once established,the Rim of the Resource Management Valley Trail would be eligible for designation as a National Recreation Trail,through The NPS would continue its existing resource management activities,partner- the existing application process,which is voluntary and initiated by trail managers. ing with stakeholders within the existing authorities of SMMNRA. State and local stakeholders would continue to have access to existing financial and technical assis- 2 , Ln Rim of the Valley Corridor Special Resource Study Newsletter#3 Fall 2012 13 Alternative B \s Angeles National Forest Los Padres 0 National Forest ` f1 a \, Santa :. Clarity '\ Angeles \\ National Forest Simi Valley Camarillo l c11, G*raaejoL f San Fernando Valley V�i�lt,y L t . s Pasadena Santa Monica Mountains r' National Recreation Area Santa i,� Los Angeles alibu Monica .,rr Study Area 0 5 10 N Alternative B-Cooperative Conservation Partnership I t I Miles Current SMMNRA Boundary National Park Service,SMMNRAGIS Updated August 16,2012 "� rte. Proposed Rim of the Valley Trail O) The NPS makes no warranty.express or implied. Sources: Existing Parks-CPAD 1.7,September 2011(Greenlnfo Network, Existing Parks and Protected Areas related to the accuracy or content of this map www.calands.org)&Property Database 2011(SMMCWRCA);Proposed Alternatives and Study Area(NPS):Roads-StreetMap Pro 2007(ESRI) 9n Rim of the\/allpv C'nrridnr SnPcial Resource Studv • Newsletter#3 • Fall 2012 Alternative B: Cooperative Conservation Partnership Concept Resource Management WNY T1t15 IS IMPORTANT Congress would authorize SMMNRA to lead a partnership of The focus of natural resource protection would be protecting public and private landowners,organizations,and institutions and enhancing habitat and connectivity between parks, This alternative would extend the to protect and expand regional open spaces in the Rim habitat areas and open spaces. The partnership would also current ability of SMMNRA and of the Valley Corridor area. The geographic focus of the explore and make recommendations related to cultural NPS to partner and coordinate with partnership would generally include the Rim of the Valley resource protection and interpretation and would engage key other land managers, landowners, study area and wildlife corridors important for protection of educational and research institutions. and other stakeholders to establish SMMNRA's significant resources. The partnership would an interconnected system of parks, explore collaborative means for establishing an interconnected Public Enjoyment habitats, and open spaces, con- system of parks,habitats,and open spaces,connecting urban Engagement of citizens in resource protection through necting urban neighborhoods and neighborhoods and surrounding mountains.The partnership interpretation and citizen science would also be explored. surrounding mountains, without would also collaborate to provide coordinated education and expanding the current boundary of interpretation focused on connecting people to the special Rim of the Valley Trail SMMNRA. The organizations would resources and stories in the Rim of the Valley Corridor area. Planning and implementation of the trail would be supported also collaborate to provide coordi- There would be no new national park unit or boundary by the NPS through technical assistance and partnership nated education and interpretation adjustment to SMMNRA. development. The trail would be owned and managed by focused on connecting people to partner agencies and organizations.The NPS would only own the special resources and stories in Management partner manage segments of the Rim of the Valley Trail within the the Rim of the Valley Corridor area. Congressional authorization would specifically direct existing national recreation area. SMMNRA to take a lead effort in the development of a coop- erative conservation plan for the Rim of the Valley Corridor area. The plan would identify mechanisms and strategies for the partnership to implement common goals and objectives. These would be executed by state and local government and private entities within the parameters of existing NPS authori- ties. The NPS would provide initial planning and administra- tive assistance for a specified term for completion of this coor- dinated management plan. Following completion of the plan,SMMNRA would provide continuing technical assistance to the partnership on a more limited scale,including the development of interpretive and educational materials. Implementation of the plan would largely be completed by other agencies. The NPS would have no authority to acquire or manage lands outside of the existing N SMMNRA boundary. Rim of the Valley Corridor Special Resource Study Newsletter#3 • Fall 2012 15 Alternative C ' Angeles ro 9 National Forest � �N Los Padres National Forest �1 Angeles _ National Forest q,rnii valiny � I :;;c;raritlo d';n91ca/o San Fernando Valley, VI°aIteay Pasadena Santa Monica Mountains r' National Recreation Area Santa f Mafi;R u moneca, Los,AliagOes, Study Area QAlternative C-Connecting Urban Communities 0 S 16 N (shading indicates boundary adjustment area) I ' I N Miles Current SMMNRA.Boundary Nattonal Park Service,SMMNRA GIs Proposed Rim of the Valley Trail uPdafedAU�urt 16 2012 N The t,PS makfti no mrarranty express.or implied. Existing Parks and Protected Areas elated to tre accuracy or content of this map Sources: Existing)Parks-CPAD 1.7,September 2011M(Greenlnfo pNetwork, 00 Alternatives and Study Area(NPS)bRoads-St ee Mep Pro 2007(ESRI) 16 Rim of the Valley Corridor Special Resource Study a Newsletter#3 e Fall 2012 Alternative C: Connecting Urban Parks a- S MNRA. Boundary Adjustment Concept Resource Management WttY T1t15 IS IMPORTArNT This alternative recommends a boundary adjustment for The resource protection focus for this alternative would be SMMNRA to provide more recreational opportunities for cultural resources and the Los Angeles River and its tributaries The focus of this boundary adjust- a broad range of urban audiences,including many who are within urban areas. The NPS would facilitate the develop- ment would be providing more under-represented in national parks and underserved by state ment of a network of cultural resource stakeholders including recreation opportunities with an and local parks. SMMNRA would have the authority to man- historical societies,institutions,and other organizations.This emphasis on creating better con- age the new area in the same manner as the existing NRA, network would explore and make recommendations related nections and access for a broad in partnership with existing land management agencies and to cultural resource protection and interpretation. Natural range of urban audiences, including organizations. The boundary adjustment includes portions of resource management would emphasize restoration and many who are under-represented the study area bordering the most populous areas of the Los enhancement.The NPS would partner with stakeholders to in national parks and underserved Angeles region,including the mountains surrounding the San develop a collaborative land protection program that includes by state and local parks. To best Fernando and La Crescenta Valleys,and the Los Angeles River cooperative planning tools and strategic land acquisition. accomplish this, the alternative and Arroyo Seco corridors. The boundary adjustment also would focus on the portions of the includes Hansen Dam,Sepulveda Basin,Los Encinos State Public Enjoyment study area that border the most Park,Debs Park,and El Pueblo de Los Angeles City Monu- Interpretive themes would focus on interactions between hu- populous areas of the Los Angeles ment,which would serve as major portals into the Rim of the man culture and the natural environment,including relation- region. With the second largest Valley Corridor area for urban populations. ships between urban communities and the Rim of the Valley population in the US, the Los An- Corridor areas. With the Los Angeles River and its tributaries geles metropolitan region is home Management providing close-to-home physical,recreational connections, to approximately 17 million people. NPS management of the new area would emphasize expanded watershed interpretive themes would be emphasized.With a This alternative would provide more partnership efforts with California State Parks and other orga- focus on engaging urban populations,the NPS would create a close-to-home opportunities for rec- nizations focused on connecting people to the national recre- network of natural and cultural resource partners that would reation and enjoyment of the study ation area through new recreational opportunities,outreach, develop resource management programs to engage the public area's resources, while providing educational and interpretive programs. through citizen science,volunteer programs and interpreta- portals to national park experiences. tion. A major focus would be partnership development with The NPS would also work collaboratively with public and existing nature centers and recreation facilities to facilitate ac- private partners to protect significant resources. NPS land cess to the Rim of the Valley Corridor. acquisition would continue to be completed in partnership with other agencies and organizations.NPS land acquisition Rom of the Valley Trail ; would be small and targeted to significant resources and key Planning and implementation of the entire Rim of the Valley recreational connections.The NPS would only consider pur- Trail would be supported by the NPS through technical assis- chase of land from willing sellers.In addition,the NPS would tance and partnership development. The NPS could own or work cooperatively with conservation organizations and pri- manage new segments of the Rim of the Valley Trail within the vate landowners to undertake cooperative conservation efforts national recreation area. Outside of the national recreation (easements,technical assistance,etc.)that do not require fed- area,the trail would be owned and managed by partner agen- t eral land acquisition. cies and organizations. Rim of the Valley Corridor Special Resource Study o Newsletter#3 Fall 2012 17 i Alternative D Angeles a;; National Forest Los Padres fl National Forest �, 0 Santa Clarta i Angeles National Forest ,ryy ,z Sinai Valley Camarillo ° fat)E t SaI7 Ferrlatirti'(r Valley �. Pasadena i J fpr Santa Mo-nica Mount-ains ` National Retreatiion Area Santa Study Area ••l" Malibu Monica Los Arngeie:S QAlternative D-Connecting Natural Habitat (shading indicates kxnlndary adjustment area) Cooperative Conservation Partnership Area 0 5 10 i N Current Sfv1A1iPVRA,Bnundary o � t I r—� South Coast Missing Linkages Miles Santa Monica Mtns to Sierra Madre.Linkage National PSik Service.SNIM14RA ISIS iV updated AugusP tC,201 Proposed Rim of the Valley,Trail fVm The NP-1;makes no warranty,expr;<m-,or implied. related to the acaaracy or cantent of this map Sources: Existing Parks-CPAD 1.7,September 2011((Greenlnfo Network, Existing Parks and ProtecIed Areas www.calands.org)&Property Database 2011(SMMC/MRCA).Proposed Alternatives and Study Area(NPS);Roads-StreetMap Pro 2007(ESRI) 18 Rim of the Valley Corridor Special Resource Study • Newsletter#3 o Fall 2012 Alternative D: Connecting Natural Habitat - SMMNRA Boundary Adjustment Concept assist in building scientific knowledge to support decision- WftY Ti H5 IS IMPOK-rWNT' This alternative would adjust the boundary of SMMNRA to making. encompass key landscape linkages and core habitat areas that The focus of this boundary adjust- connect the large natural areas of SMMNRA,the Los Padres To facilitate habitat connectivity between the Los Padres ment would be on including key National Forest,the Angeles National Forest,and state and National Forest and the Rim of the Valley Corridor,the NPS landscape linkages and core habi- local habitat areas to promote long term resiliency of the natu- would be authorized to engage in cooperative conservation tat areas that connect the large ral resources within SMMNRA. SMMNRA would have the partnerships with public and private landowners,organiza- natural areas of SMMNRA, the Los authority to manage the new area in the same manner as the tions,and institutions to the north of the study area. Authori- Padres National Forest, the Ange- existing NRA,in partnership with existing land management ties would not include land acquisition or management. les National Forest, and state and agencies and organizations. local habitat areas. With ongoing Resource Management habitat loss and fragmentation in These linkages would include habitat connections north of The primary focus of resource protection in this alternative the region, as well as the threats the Santa Susana Mountains to the southern boundary of would be natural resource protection and connectivity to pro- associated with disturbances such the Los Padres National Forest and the connection from the mote long term resiliency of biological resources in the Rim as large scale fire, these key link- eastern Santa Susana Mountains to the western boundary of of the Valley Corridor. Preserving connections between large, ages are critical for the long term the San Gabriel Mountains portion of the Angeles National habitat areas would help protect existing natural resources in survival of the natural resources Forest. SMMNRA by providing flexibility for migration and adapta- within the existing SMMNRA tion in response to periodic disturbance,such as large scale boundary. Without functional Management fire,and longer term environmental changes. While the em- landscape connections for migra- NPS management of the new area would emphasize collabor- phasis would be on natural resources,a number of significant tion, dispersal, and other ecologi- ative partnerships focused on habitat connectivity. The NPS cultural resources would be included and protected within the cal functions, some native species would work collaboratively with public and private partners boundary and would provide opportunities for interpretation in the Santa Monica Mountains to protect significant resources,expand public enjoyment op- and education around cultural resource themes. may cease to exist there in the portunities,and provide interpretation and education about future. the area's resources. Public Enjoyment The interpretive focus in this alternative would be the interac- NPS land acquisition would continue to be completed in part- tion between human culture and the natural environment, nership with other agencies and organizations.NPS land ac- focusing on themes related to biodiversity. The NPS would quisition would be small and targeted to significant resources provide technical assistance and other partnership and pro- and ecological connectivity.The NPS would only consider grammatic related roles to support trail and recreation efforts purchase of land from willing sellers.The NPS would also through existing authorities. The NPS would continue current s work cooperatively with conservation organizations and outreach and other related programmatic efforts to engage ur- private landowners to undertake cooperative conservation ef- ban communities in the Rim of the Valley area. forts that do not require federal land acquisition(easements, grants,technical assistance for best management practices, Rim of the Valley Trail N etc.). Universities and other partners would be engaged to Same as Alternative C. Rim of the Valley Corridor Special Resource Study Newsletter#3 • Fall 2012 19 Alternative D ,fl A :... i Additional Cooperative Las Padres Natlana!Fo ; Conservation Partnership Area rest a { 1111111 t's Santa Cierita Angeles National Forest q � Pacific Crest Trail . 11741 'f 11ey " Ca rr off+. San Fernando Valley Pasadena Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area , Study Area Santa m a8 Los Angeles Monica `:` Alternative 0-Connecting Natural Habitat jshading indicates boundary adjustment area) Cooperative Conservation Partnership Area a s tt� Current SMMNRA Boundary ! , - ""J South Coast Missing Linkages Was • r Santa Monica Mins to Sierra Madre Linkage Nafkxeal Nrk8yrwm AININRA CIS UpdBtbdAWkwA 15 2012 Proposed Rim of the Valley Trail Ow NPs makac novmrra*.ekprerxw,mp„w, Existing Parks and Protected Areas '*t1w to the—ravi or eftwil of thts trip u011rUrt Ex+ np'9 s-CP D 1.i', raxr:fits rCy annkfo Neixvik, vlWrr.ta:anasa ll rho Agenda item 12 ND N SNiMC 0 5 10 Miles (N) NO 12/3/12 1� 20 @Q9s-J'dh®V➢r�,h k"�YCa"Ji:�""�.YtlSa U.S.Depth°nh�2 11 �'u''she Interior FIRST CLASS MAIL US.POSTAGE PAID NATIONAL PARK Sim of the Valley Corridor Special Resource Steads,/ SERVICE-INTERIOR 570 W.Avenue 26,#175 PERMIT NO.G-83 Los Angeles,CA 90065 EXPERIENCE YOUR AMEMCA " Public Meeting Schedule National Park Service J.S.Department of the Interior Check the study website for a full list of public meetings in the area as well as ways to engage in the study online To receive up-to-date information about public meetings, please join our e-mail list by visiting:www.nps.gov/pwro/rimofthevalley Contact Information Wednesday,November 7,2012,7-9 p.m. Tuesday,November 27,2012,6:30-8:30 p.m. Conejo Recreation and Parks District Encino Community Center-Women's Club Mail: National Park service Community Room 4935 Balboa Blvd. * 570 W.Avenue 26,#175 403 Hillcrest Dr. Encino, CA 91316 Los Angeles,CA 90065 Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 *Thursday,November 29,2012,7-9 p.m. Care NPS Study Team: Thursday,November 8,2012,7-9 p.m. (Moorpark Community Center Anne Dove George A. Caravalho Santa Clarita Sports Complex 799 Moorpark Ave. Project Manager Activities Center Building Moorpark, CA 93021 (323)441-9307 20880 Centre Pointe Parkway Santa Clarita, CA 91350 Saturday,December 1,2012,10 a.m.-noon • Eaton Canyon Nature Center Margie 5teigerwald *Tuesday,November 13,2012,6:30-8:30 p.m. 1750 North Altadena D Outdoor Recreation Planner Dr Pacific Community Center Pasadena,CA 91107 (805)370-2373 501 S. Pacific Ave. • Glendale, CA 91204 *Habra un traductor disponible para E-mail: estas reuniones publican. pwr_rimofthevalley@nps.gov Thursday,November 15,2012,7-9 p.m. 11Vebsite: (Mason Recreation Center 10500 Mason Ave. httpJ/www.nps.gov/pwro/rimofthevalley Chatsworth, CA 91311 " 223 STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G.BROWN,JR.,Governor SANTA MONICA MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY RAMIREZ CANYON PARK 5750 RAMIREZ CANYON ROAD MALIBU,CALIFORNIA 90265 PHONE(310)5893200 FAX(310)5893207 December 3, 2012 Ann Dove, Project Manager National Park Service, RICA 570 West Avenue 26, Suite 175 Los Angeles, California 90065 Rim of the Valley Corridor Special Resources Study Comments on Preliminary Findings and Alternative Concepts Dear Ms. Dove: The Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy offers the following comments on the recently released Preliminary Findings and Alternative Concepts for the National Park Service's Rim of the Valley Corridor Special Resources Study. The Conservancy concurs with the Study's broad depiction of new areas determined to be nationally significant because of unique cultural and natural resources that they contain. The Conservancy's legislative boundary currently mirrors the Rim of the Valley Corridor Area shown in the Study's Alternative A. This agency's extensive experience in that area continues to support the importance of these new areas determined to be of national significance by your team. The synergy allowed by the near-total overlap of the Conservancy's boundary with the existing Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area boundary has produced unprecedented levels of resource protection. Agency boundary overlap is a prerequisite to adequate resource protection in complex areas both adjacent to and within a metropolis. This level of success would clearly be duplicated within any, and all areas where the boundary of the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area (sivnMNRA) is expanded. In addition, this level of resource protection can only be achieved with the option for National Park Service (NPs) property acquisition and management. Study Alternative B-Cooperative Conservation Partnership has merit but is inadequate without potential Nps property acquisition at a minimum. The above proven synergy of agency boundary overlap works throughout the existing Rim of the Valley Trail Corridor Zone. Study Alternative C - also has strong merit but is inadequate because a vital resource protection partner(NPs)is eliminated from key areas in the western Santa Monica Mountains,the Simi Hills,Santa Susana Mountains,and San CC ATTACHMENT 2 224 Rim of the Valley Corridor Special Resources Study Preliminary Findings and Alternative Concepts Comments December 5, 2012 Page 2 Gabriel Mountains. The boundary of Alternative c artificially cuts off entire hill systems and halves of mountain ranges that are ecologically vital the existing SMMNRA. This alternative also eliminates all portions of the Rim of the Valley Corridor which contain the nationally significant Pacific Crest Trail. Study Alternative D accomplishes much of what Alternative C does not provide in regards to preservation of whole geomorphological units and maintaining habitat connectivity. However,pulling a key potential agency partner out of the Verdugo Mountains,San Rafael Hills, Los Angeles River, San Gabriel Mountains, and Santa Clara River leaves scores of square miles of nationally significant area without an adequate agency team for resource protection. Alternative D includes a vital element by encompassing a special Cooperative Conservation Partnership Area extending from the northern Rim of the Valley Corridor boundary in the Santa Susana Mountains to the Los Padres National Forest. This proposed partnership area not only completes connectivity between federal jurisdictions,it completes the critical Sierra Madre to Santa Susana inter-mountain range habitat linkage. The only alternative that can provide adequate resource protection to all of the preliminarily determined areas of national significance is a new alternative that fully combines the area covered in Alternative D and in Alternative C. The Cooperative Conservation Partnership Area in Alternative D is fundamental to this new alternative. The attached Conservancy figure (super-imposed on Alternative D) also shows another vital Cooperative Conservation Partnership Area that should be added to the new alternative to connect the two portions of the Angeles National Forest in the Santa Clara River watershed. This addition would create seamless federal jurisdiction and complete the regional significant Angeles linkage inter-mountain range habitat linkage. The quality,abundance,and broad distribution of nationally significant resources compiled by your team to date, all proximate to seven million people,warrant nothing less than the creation of this new geographically complete Study alternative described directly above. Please address any future correspondence to Paul Edelman of our staff at the above address and by phone at (310) 589-3200 ext. 128. Sincerely, ELIZABETH A. CHEADLE 225 Rim of the Valley Corridor Special Resources Study Preliminary Findings and Alternative Concepts Comments December 5, 2012 Page 3 Chairperson 226