HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2010 0317 CC REG ITEM 08A ITEM 8.A.
CITY OF MOORPARK,CALIFORNIA
City Council Meeting
of .3'/1'00/11
ACTION:
�?0/0—,R a v AsxHc
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIP-Y `nl
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: David A. Bobardt, Community Development Director
Prepared by Joseph Fiss, Principal Planner
DATE: March 8, 2010 (CC Meeting of March 17, 2010)
SUBJECT: Consider Resolution Approving Modification No. 1 to Residential
Planned Development (RPD) No. 1998-01, a Request to Relocate the
Required Recreation Center from Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
5425 to Tract Map No. 5133, Located on the South Side of Los
Angeles Avenue at Millard Street, on the Application of Shea Homes,
Inc.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
On February 17, 2010, the City Council took testimony at an open public hearing for
consideration of Modification No. 1 to Residential Planned Development No. 1998-01,
,the relocation of a recreation area to serve the Canterbury Lane development by Shea
Homes. A copy of the staff report is attached. Testimony by Fremont Street neighbors
at the hearing focused on concerns over activity levels expected at the proposed
location, along with parking, noise, lighting, and litter. The City Council continued this
matter to March 17, 2010, with the public hearing still open, and asked the applicant to
meet with the Fremont Street residents to see if the concerns could be addressed.
The applicant met with Fremont Street residents on March 2, 2010, presenting the
residents with two alternative site plans. After the meeting, these alternative site plans
were further refined as Design Studies 1 and 2 (attached). A synopsis of design
changes made to the plans by the applicant in response to the neighbors' concerns is
provided in the attached letter from the applicant. Both these studies have re-oriented
access and parking from Fremont Street to Majestic Court. A key distinction in the
revised design under Study 2 is the provision of recreation building in a location that
would buffer the Fremont Street neighborhood from pool lighting and noise. Under the
proposed open meeting room design in this alternative, the facility could not be reserved
1
Honorable City Council
March 17, 2010
Page 2
for special events, reducing the potential for large gatherings and associated noise and
parking demand.
Staff requested an additional design study (Study 3) that included an off-street parking
lot to provide additional parking and to avoid the need to back up into Majestic Court.
Study 3 provides similar buffering of the Fremont Street neighborhood from the noise
and lighting of the pool area as Study 2, however, it is able to maintain one additional
street parking space on Majestic Court and provide 5 parking spaces that do not require
backing out into the street. The disadvantage of Study 3 is that the play area is greatly
reduced because of the driveway and back-up area. Because of this, staff is in support
of the Study 2 design.
The 4 off-street parking spaces shown in Study 2, when combined with 3 available
street parking spaces on Majestic Court adjacent to the recreation area, should be more
than sufficient parking to avoid impacts to the Fremont Street neighborhood. Although
the parking spaces in Study 2 require backing into the street, there are already 6
existing homes in Tract 5133 (Canterbury 1) and 19 additional homes with Tract 5425
(Canterbury II) that will have driveways (50 parking spaces total) which require backing
into Majestic Court as it extends to Los Angeles Avenue. The City Engineer/Public
Works Director has reviewed this proposal and has found it would not pose a conflict
with traffic patterns.
Since the February 17, 2010 City Council meeting, the following conditions of approval
have been added to the draft resolution to address potential neighborhood impacts
(shown on the draft resolution in legislative format):
• Condition No. 13 requires lighting review by the City's lighting consultant to
ensure spillover lighting from the recreation area is minimized.
• Condition No. 14 allows for the future establishment of a preferential parking
district on Fremont Street, should one be requested in the future.
• Conditions Nos. 19 and 20 provide that the recreation area may be open only
between 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM daily, the recreation area may not be reserved
except for homeowners' association general meetings, alcoholic beverages
would not be permitted in the recreation area, and the off-street parking spaces
may not be used between 10:00 PM and 7:00 AM.
An exhibit has also been prepared (Attachment 5) in response to questions from the
City Council on February 17, 2010 about the various locations previously approved or
proposed for the recreation area. The following is a synopsis of the
approvals/proposals to accompany the exhibit.
Location A — The City Council adopted Resolution No. 99-1666 on October 6, 1999,
approving Tentative Tract Map No. 5133 and RPD No. 1998-01 (Canterbury 1) with a
6,650 square-foot recreation area at the northeast corner of Majestic Court and what is
now Millard St. The tot lot was conditioned to be allowed in Arroyo Simi area if
S:\Community Development\DEV PMTS\R P D11998-01 Shea 1\Mod 1Agenda Reports\cc agenda report 10 0317.doc
2
Honorable City Council
March 17, 2010
Page 3
permitted by the Ventura County Watershed Protection District (VCWPD) and
Community Development Director.
I
Location 8 — On June 14, 2002, Minor Modification No. 2 was approved by the
Community Development Director, with the tot lot relocated to a 2,520 square-foot area
south of Majestic Court and east of Millard Street, as the previous location was not
approved by the Ventura County Flood Control District (now Watershed Protection
District). The recreation area was in the same location.
Location C — Minor Modification No. 3 was approved by the City Council on July 2,
2003, with the recreation area to be in the vicinity of lots 46, 47 and 48 (Location A) or
outside the project boundaries (Location C) on what would become Vesting Tentative
Tract Map No. 5425 (Canterbury II), with precise siting subject to the approval of the
Community Development Director. It is also the current proposed location, with
approximately 17,200 square feet for the recreation area and tot lot.
Location D — Residential Planned Development 2003-02 and Vesting Tentative Tract
Map No. 5425 (Canterbury II) were approved by the City Council on April 6, 2005 for
102 dwelling units with a 15,405 square foot recreation area and tot lot at the southeast
corner of the site to serve both Canterbury I and II.
Location E — The original application for Modification No. 1 to RPD 1998-01 requested
relocation of the recreation lot for Tract Map No. 5133 to a 12,785 square-foot area in
the southwest corner of the property, with the tot-lot area integrated to recreation area.
At the time this modification application was filed, Shea Homes was intending to finish
Tract No. 5133 as a standalone project, and was not sure whether development of
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5425 would occur in the near future. Staff expressed
concerns over the accessibility and lack of visibility of this location in the December 16,
2009 report to City Council.
Location F — The location recommended by staff in the December 16, 2009 report to
City Council on the Modification No. 1 request. Location C was identified as an
alternative location by staff.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
SACommunity DevelopmentlDEV PMTSIR P D11998-01 Shea 1Nod 1\Agenda Reportslcc agenda report 10 0317.doc
3
Honorable City Council
March 17, 2010
Page 4
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1. Continue to accept public testimony and close the public hearing.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 2010- , approving Modification No. 1 to Residential
Planned Development (RPD) No. 1998-01 as recommended by staff, subject to
conditions of approval.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Staff Report from February 17, 2010 (without attachments)
2. March 5, 2010 Letter from Shea Homes
3. Design Studies 1-3
4. Alternative Recreation Building Floor Plan
5. Approved and Proposed Locations of Recreation Area
6. Draft Resolution with Conditions of Approval
S:\CommunityDevelopmentIDEVPMTS\R P D\1998-01 Shea 1Nod 1Agenda Reports\cc agenda report 10 0317.doc
4
ITEM 8.A.
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: David A. Bobardt, Community Development Direj#or i
Prepared by Joseph Fiss, Principal Planner
DATE: February 5, 2010 (CC Meeting of February 17, 010)
SUBJECT: Consider Resolution Approving Modification No. 1 to Residential
Planned Development (RPD) No. 1998-01, a Request to Relocate the
Required Recreation Center from Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
5425 to Tract Map No. 5133, Located on the South Side of Los
Angeles Avenue at Millard Street, on the Application of Shea Homes,
Inc.
BACKGROUND
On July 13, 2009 Shea Homes, Inc., submitted an application for a Modification to the
original conditions of approval of RPD No. 1998-01 to relocate the required recreation
center from Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5425 to Tract Map No. 5133, located on
the south side of Los Angeles Avenue at Millard Street. The City Council opened a
public hearing on this application on December 16, 2009, and continued the matter to
January 20, 2010 at the request of the applicant to allow the staff and applicant
additional time to discuss staff concerns and recommended conditions. The continued
public hearing on January 20, 2010 was continued again to February 17, 2010 at the
request of the applicant. No testimony was provided on either date. As a result of
discussions between the applicant and staff, the applicant is now proposing to locate
the recreation lot for both Tract Map No. 5133 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
5425 within the boundaries of Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5425, north of an
extension of Majestic Court and east of Tract Map No. 5133 (location map attached),
centrally located for both subdivisions. This staff report and the recommended
conditions in the attached resolution have been updated based on discussions with the
applicant. Because of the new location; area property owners have been re-notfied
(copy of notice attached) of this open and continued public hearing with a map showing
the new proposed location.
CC ATTACHMENT 1
5
Honorable City Council
February 17, 2010
Page 2
DISCUSSION
Permit modifications may be considered for any proposed change that is not extensive
enough to be considered a substantial or fundamental change in the approved
entitlement or use relative to the permit, would not have a substantial adverse impact on
surrounding properties and would not change any findings contained in the
environmental documentation prepared for the permit. Action on a permit modification
application is taken by the decision-making body that approved the original permit by
the same process and public noticing as required for the original project application. In
this case, the City Council was the original decision-making body of the RPD, through a
noticed public hearing process.
The City Council adopted Resolution No. 99-1666 on October 6, 1999, approving
Tentative Tract Map No. 5133 and RPD No. 1998-01 for 79 residential duplex
condominium units. This project is known as Canterbury Lane, or "Canterbury 1". The
recreation area was approved at the northeast comer of Majestic Court and "A" Street
(now Millard St.), and conditioned for a tot-lot to be allowed in Arroyo Simi area if
permitted by the Ventura County Watershed Protection District (VCWPD) and
Community Development Director. An unnumbered and unlettered condition was
included between Condition No. 33 j and k (Page 52 of Resolution No. 99-1666) as
follows:
" The size of the recreational area shall be increased pursuant to Staff Alternative "8"
and shall contain a pool minimum surface area of 1,000 sq. ft.), spa, wading pool, deck
area, tot-lot, and building containing restrooms and a meeting room. The design of the
recreation facility, fencing and equipment proposed for the tot-lot shall be as approved
by the Director of Community Development. The tot4ot may be located on Ventura
County Flood Control property if approved by the Ventura County Flood Control District
and the Director of Community Development."
Attachment No. 3 shows a recreation area of 95 feet by 70 feet (6,650 square feet) as
originally approved, with no on-site parking. It does not show the precise location of the
tot-lot.
On June 14, 2002, Minor Modification No. 2 was approved by the Community
Development Director. The proposed tot-lot in the Arroyo Simi floodway area was not
approved by the Ventura County Flood Control District (now Watershed Protection
District) and was relocated across the street from the recreation area south of Majestic
Court, east of"A" Street(Millard St.) on a 36' by 70' (2,520 square-foot) lot as shown on
Attachment No. 4.
Minor Modification No. 3 was approved by the City Council on July 2, 2003. The
recreation area was relocated to be in the vicinity of lots 46, 47 and 48 on the northeast
comer of Majestic Court and Millard Street or outside the project boundaries
(Attachment No. 5) on what would become Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5425
S:%Community Devebpment%DEV PMTS%R P D11998-01 Shea Mod 1 Wgenda RepoRsbc agenda report 10 0217.fte
6
Honorable City Council
February 17, 2010
Page 3
(Canterbury II), with precise siting, subject to the approval of the Community
Development Director. The latter described area is the area currently proposed for the
recreation area to serve both Tract Map No. 5133 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
5425. A precise site plan and design for the recreation area under Minor Modification
No. 3 was never submitted as processing of the adjacent Vesting Tentative Tract Map
No. 5425 had begun. This new project proposal included a single recreation area to
serve both (then) Tentative Tract Map No. 5133 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No.
5425.
Residential Planned Development 2003-02 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5425
were approved by the City Council on April 6, 2005 for 102 dwelling units. This project
was intended to be a continuation of the Canterbury Lane project and was known as
"Canterbury II", with the same product type, and the same Homeowner's Association
(HOA). A condition of approval was included to develop a 15,405 square foot recreation
area at the southeast corner of the site, adjacent to the Arroyo Simi (Attachment No. 6),
that would meet the needs of 179 dwelling units (77 from Canterbury I and 102 from
Canterbury II), and the requirement for a recreation area at Canterbury I would be
satisfied at this location with no further modifications to the conditions of approval. At
this point, the recreation area and tot lot were no longer reflected on plans for
Canterbury I. To date, Zoning Clearances for building permits had been issued for 60
homes in Canterbury I, 4 of which are in the model complex and the rest are occupied.
The original application for Modification No. 1 to RPD 1998-01 requested relocation of
the recreation lot for Tract Map No. 5133 to a 12,785 square-foot area in the southwest
comer of the property, with the tot-lot area integrated to recreation area. At the time this
modification application was filed, Shea Homes was intending to finish Tract No. 5133
as a standalone project, and was not sure whether development of Vesting Tentative
Tract Map No. 5425 would occur in the near future.
Since this time, Shea has revisited the feasibility of proceeding with Vesting Tentative
Tract Map No. 5425 and has indicated a desire to continue pursuing the development
as originally approved. The modification application had been amended with a revised
proposal for an approximately 17,200 square-foot recreation lot and integrated tot-lot
north of an extension of Majestic Court and immediately east of Tract Map No. 5133. A
1,172 square-foot clubhouse and a 1,125 square-foot pool plus wading pool and spa
are included in this proposal.
The revised location for this recreation lot would be more centrally located for both Tract
Map No. 5133 and Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5425. It would also be larger than
the currently approved 15,405 square-foot recreation area (Attachment 6), and it would
also be more visible within the community. As noted above, the Homeowners'
Association is already set up to serve both subdivisions, making management of the
recreation area straightforward. The design for the clubhouse is compatible with the
S:Tkx= q DevelopmenADEV PMTSIR P D1199"I Shea Mod I ftelda Reporb%c agenda report 10 0217.doc
7
Honorable City Council
February 17, 2010
Page 4
architecture of the rest of the project. In addition, the open space area at the end of
Millard Street would be maintained with the new proposed location.
Recommended conditions have been modified from the original conditions proposed on
December 16, 2009, due to the new location of the recreation area. Timing for some of
the conditions has also been modified based on the phasing of Tract Map No. 5133,
now that the recreation area is no longer removing proposed houses. A review of plans
by the Police Department and an 8-foot high wall on the northern property line of the
recreation lot would address security and privacy issues associated with the new
location for the recreation area. Street improvements that would be needed include the
extension of Majestic Court to Fremont Street, and dedication of right-of-way from
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5425 for Los Angeles Avenue road widening, along
with a security deposit for its improvement, should the City construct the widening prior
to the development of this subdivision. Finally, a condition is added to ensure that
access is provided from the private extension of Millard Street in Tract Map No. 5133 to
a residentially-zoned parcel owned by the Redevelopment Agency.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1. Continue to accept public testimony and close the public hearing.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 2010- approving Modification No. 1 to Residential
Planned Development (RPD) No. 1998-01 as recommended by staff, subject to
conditions of approval.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Location Map
2. Aerial Photograph
3. Recreation Area Location as Originally Approved
4. Recreation Area Location As Approved per Minor Modification No. 2
5. Recreation Area Location As Approved per Minor Modification No. 3
6. Recreation Area Location As Approved per Tract 5425
7. Project Plans (Under Separate Cover)
8. Public Notice
9. Draft Resolution with Conditions of Approval
S:W mmw4 DevelopmerrilDEV PMTSIR P D11998-01 Shea Mod 11Agenda Repoftoc agenda report 10 0217.doc
8
SheaHomes
Caring since M&
March 5. 2010
David Bobardt
Planning Director
City of Moorpark
700 Moorpm*Ave.
Moorpark, CA 93021
Sub3ect: Canterbury Lane Recreation Center Application
Dear Mr. Bobardt,
We want to start by saying thank you to both you and Joe for attending the meeting we held with
the Freirnont Street residents on Tuesday evening, March 2n4, 2010. We believe it was a benefit
for you to hear what they had to say and we also appreciate you being there to provide your
knowtedge and comments about the project.
As you know, over the past couple of weeks we studied various options to the recreation center
site plan in an effort to address concerns that were raised at the City Council meeting on
February 174h,21 90. Below is a recap of concerns that were raised and how we plan to mitigate
each'one. Some of the concerns are addressed with same changes in each study and they are
included in the first table. The second and third tables outline the specific changes made for the
respective site plan. The last table is how we plan to address concerns through the
Implementation of rules and design, however, these are not changes from what was previously
submitted. The rules are stated as proposed because until they are adopted by the Board of
Directors,they are not considered approved.
• Changes made to Studies 1 and 2
Issue or Concern Chatige Made to Address the Issue
Parking on Fremont Street Relocated the designated parking from
Fremont Street to Majestic Court and
increased the number of parking stalls by
two.
Access points on Fremont Street will Relocated all access points from Fremont
cause a parking issue on Fremont Street to Majestic Court. There is no access
Street to-the recreation facility from Fremont Street.
1250 Cwww Pointe Coun
suArdoo CC ATTACHMENT 2 s1,a Homo ei�►imtn..ne,���
Corona,G 92879 SJxa Horna.lfRn&mtdCempR►r�
!wltXi�rwrw�r..q(dr G.r/w.(�.r(nrynda
951.73A 9700 r
95/.738 1758 r
• Changes made to Study 1
Issue or Concern Change Made to Address the Issue
Noise from the Meeting Room Relocated the building to the southwest
comer of the parcel.
Adjacency to the existing residence With the relocation of the building, the tot lot
on Fremont Street was moved so that it is now adjacent to the
existing residence. The tot lot and
surrounding landscaping provide for a buffer
between the existing residence and the pool
area.
Recreation center will generate The tot lot adjacent to the Fremont residence
additional overflow lighting to Fremont will not have lights,just walkway bollards. It
Street is only open from dawn until dusk. Shea
Homes will work with the Police Department
on acceptable lighting that minimizes the
impact to Fremont Street.
Large number of People Meeting room is limited to 34 people per the
Fire Department. Proposed rule states that
homeowners are not permitted to host more
than four (4)guests in the pool area at any
iven time.
• Changes made to Study 2
Issue or Concern Change Made to Address the Issue
Noise for Meeting Room This plan creates a covered patio area in lieu
of a meeting room. The covered patio area is
integrated into the pool area and provides a
shade element for users of the pool and still
provides a location for HOA quarterly
meetings. Of most importance to the
Fremont homeowners, it eliminates a room
that could be reserved for parties. Proposed
pool rules state that homeowners may not
reserve the pool area facilities for exclusive
use.
Adjacency to the existing residence The building is oriented away from the
on Fremont Street existing residence and acts as a buffer
between the pool and residence.
Recreation center will generate The building adjacent to the Fremont
additional overflow lighting to Fremont residence will help block the required lighting
Street in the pool area. The lighting will all be
directed towards Majestic Court. Shea
Homes will work with the Police Department
on acceptable lighting that minimizes the
impact to Fremont Street.
Large number of People Proposed rule states that homeowners are
not permitted to host more than four(4)
nests in the pool area at any given time.
• Designs features and rules for Studies 1 and 2
Issue or Concern Design Features and Rules to Address Issue
Late Night Parties and Noise Proposed pool hours from 6:00 am -9:00 pm
on Sunday through Thursday and 6:00 am -
10:00 pm on Fridays and Saturdays. The
closing time is one hour earlier than what we
typically do at our communities. A key fob
system will be utilized so that the gates lock
at the appropriate time.
General concern regarding two story The recreation center building is one story
buildings whereas the homes plotted on these lots are
two stories.
Trash and dumpsters The recreation center will not have a
dumpster and the trash cans will be emptied
on a weekly basis by the janitorial company.
Drinking alcohol Alcohol and smoking are not permitted in the
pool area.
We believe some of the residents from Fremont Street were satisfied with the alternate plans we
proposed but we also realize others want it in a different location and will not be satisfied with
our proposed location. Our response to this is that we have tried, through our various revisions,
to mitigate their concerns the best we could but given the site constraints, this is the only
feasible option at this time. We also believe that with our decision to proceed with Canterbury Il,
it no longer makes sense to build the recreation center on any of the remaining lots of Tract
5133.
Similar to the recommendation made by City Staff In the Staff Report dated November 161h
2009, we believe the recreation center located on Lots 71 -74 of Tract 5425 is an ideal location.
This location is central to both communities and allows for a larger recreation center. In
addition, the underground utilities are in a location that we can build the recreation center this
year and hopefully be in a position to deliver it to our homeowners by year end. If we wait and
build it in the current approved location within Tract 5425, we will not be able to deliver it this
year and most likely not next year either. As you know, there is significant infrastructure that
needs to be designed, approved and installed to get us to a point where we can begin to build
the recreation center. Even if we were to wait for the infrastructure to be installed and build it
as an island, there will not be 'eyes" on it and homeowners trying to gain access will be required
to walk through a construction site, which we try to limit because of safety concerns.
We strongly believe in the two plans we are proposing for the Canterbury Lane community.
Each plan has a different layout but both work well for the given location. We think either plan
will be acceptable to the Canterbury Lane homeowners, however, we would like to expand on
the idea of an outdoor covered gathering area because we feel it will be an improvement to the
Canterbury Lane recreation center. These outdoor areas get significantly more use than a
meeting room, they are less maintenance so it should lower the HOA dues, and since it cannot
be reserved, the HOA does not have to deal with renting it out and inspecting it after each use.
In the plan submitted as part of this application (study 2), we also feel it provides a much better
buffer to the Fremont Street residents (visually and sound) and allows for a layout that interacts
well with the pool, bbq and tot lot area. We understand that this is not typical in Moorpark but
given these are single family homes and the meeting room is designed at 500 SF, we believe
homeowners holding an event will do so in their home and backyard, especially since the
meeting room is only slightly larger than the family 8 dining rooms of the units and renting it will
require a deposit and most likely cost a fee.
Please let us know if you have questions about either recreation center layout and if there is any
additional information you would like us to provide. I can be reached at (951) 739-9718 or
brooke.thomas@sheahomes.com.
Sincerely,
Shea Homes Limited Partnership
t��
Brooke Thomas
Community Development Manager
i
515.6
X
i
I
515.2
X
-
-c,. ••� II
LOT
37
cpl
:er
q �llJ L�L.1 wV
D
z
LOT 4 : ` Im
oe
r
N O R T H n MO 000 I
SCALE t'=10.0'
-- - MAJESTIC COURT
CANTERBURY
RECREATION AREA SheaHomes JORDAN,GILBERTSBAIN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS,INC
STUDY 1 SOU'FIIERN CALIFORNIA DIVISION
N
W
513.9
515.6
X
P,�P,woPa,�P
e,isrwc a..ruae
i
i
i
LOT
37 " a
IL
ry a o
� � g
A! ® az Y
LOT
♦3
E IS e�
�.1
�uf RPM t,
e�.
N ORTH .'�
SCALE T•10'-0` c ycrl °.
UnTE):vein
u✓,.ssr�c rounr _
CANTERBURY
RECREATION AREA SheaHomes
STUDY 2 JORDAN,GILBERT d BAIN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS,INC.
.._ _ SOUITILRN CALIFORNIA DIVISION �nmwi c.wroP�w nDa..z ne.E YTI
I--I
�A
X
1
I
I
®uw�
cwrriaouuae
I
i
I
I
�R WNL
�qH.ttlYB�
LOT
K„^`
37
arz
0
LOT
43 "Q ' qt y i A<s
f S a ir�r, en
' ^
N ORTM
SCALE 1'=10'-0'
Unn;r:uno eHw,rxto e.wn
® .wu kcow�
1''`°" CANTERBURY
RECREATION AREA SheaHomes Ili.A
JORDAN.GILBERT d BAIN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS INC
STUDY 3 SOUTHERN r,ALI FORN IAIll VISION
N
-1----------------------------------------------
n _
MEN'S WOMEN'S _
,
a
A EQUIPMENT
ROOM
'4 I•OUNTAi- ___ ________________________
e
POOL CABANA
, i I
,
SHOWERS
POOL CABANA-507 SQ.FT.
TOILETS=329 SQ.FT.
EQUIPMENT ROOM= 174 SQ.FT.
SHOWERS a 57 SQ.FT.
TOTAL= 1,190 SQ.FT.
SheaHomes MSSWAN
CANTERBURY LANE RECREATION BUILDING
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA w ,
vrao'o�10�_•� .
rn
,i
.118'
r� 2 rn
A ORIGINAL APPROVED
LOCATION. (TOT LOT
WITHIN ARROYO RIGH]
T .
° S
;.
4 fi 4.
OF WAY)
WN
MALr
Y
i
j ,,� 1 •D •
(TOT LOT SOUTH OF
r• I:. �- MAJESTIC
$ I �� "�r i•'Er'F' y' ,7e-• 1L '1 . i#51'�` ,�6 REC AREA APPROVED
_
:..� �f A � a 1 . .D NO 3
1l 7,L *I ! g AND RECOMMENDED
ALT ERNATIVE LOCATION
k+ r:FZij t -I��tl; « ._t" tam �t� -1 BY
J .tK.
ED LOCAl
D REC. AREA LOCATION
. y p rub
APPROVED ■ 1
is
x E REC. AREA AS FIRST
PROPOSED BY VV/ MOD
TION
APPLICA
F. REC AREA LOCATION
en
I
1 1.
a t RECOMMENDED BY
17 STAFF IN 12/16/09 RPT
RESOLUTION NO. 2010-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MODIFICATION NO. 1 TO
RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (RPD) NO. 1998-01, A
REQUEST TO RELOCATE THE REQUIRED RECREATION CENTER
FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF VESTING TENTATIVE
TRACT MAP NO. 5425 TO THE WESTERN EDGE OF VESTING
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 5425, NORTH OF MAJESTIC COURT,
ON THE APPLICATION OF SHEA HOMES, INC.
WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing held on December 16, 2009,
January 20, 2010, February 17, 2010, and March 17, 2010, the City Council considered the
agenda report and any supplements thereto and any written public comments; opened the
public hearing, took and considered public testimony both for and against the proposal,
closed the public hearing, and reached a decision on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the City Council concurs with the Community Development Director's
determination that this project would not change any findings contained in the
environmental documentation prepared for the permit.
SECTION 1. MODIFICATION FINDINGS: Based upon the information set forth
in the staff report(s), accompanying studies, and oral and written public testimony, the City
Council makes the following findings in accordance with City of Moorpark, Municipal Code
Section 17.44.030:
1. The modification will not alter any of the findings of the original approval of
Residential Planned Development 1998-01.
2. The modification will not alter any of the findings in the environmental document
prepared for Residential Planned Development 1998-01 and will have no adverse
impacts on the environment.
3. The modification will not have any adverse impact on surrounding properties.
SECTION 2. CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: The City Council hereby approves
Modification No.1 to Residential Planned Development No. 1998-01 (Study 2 in March 17,
2010 staff report), subject to Conditions of Approval attached hereto and incorporated
herein as Exhibit A.
CC ATTACHMENT 6
18
Resolution No. 2010-
Page 2
SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall
cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of March, 2010.
Janice S. Parvin, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
Exhibit A: Conditions of Approval:
SACommunity Development\DEV PMTS\R P D\1998-01 Shea INod 1\Resolutions\cc resolution 10 0317.doc
19
Resolution No. 2010-
Page 3
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR MODIFICATION
NO. 1 TO RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 1998-01
1. The permit is granted for the land and project as identified on the entitlement
application for a Modification and as shown on the attached, approved plans. The
location and design of all site improvements shall be as shown on the approved plot
plans and elevations (Study 2 in March 17, 2010 staff report), except or unless
indicated otherwise by conditions within this letter.
2. All Conditions of Approval for Residential Planned Development (RPD) NO. 1998-01
as amended are incorporated by reference in this approval letter and shall continue
to apply unless specifically modified by this permit.
3. Within thirty (30) calendar days of approval of this entitlement, the applicant shall
sign and return to the Planning Division an Affidavit of Agreement and Notice of
Entitlement Permit Conditions of Approval, indicating that the applicant has read and
agrees to meet all Conditions of Approval of this entitlement. The Affidavit of
Agreement/Notice shall include a legal description of the subject property, and have
the appropriate notary acknowledgement suitable for recordation.
4. This Modification expires one (1) year from the date of its approval unless the use
has been inaugurated by issuance of a building permit for construction. The
Community Development Director may, at his/her discretion, grant up to two (2)
additional one-year extensions for use inauguration of the development permit, if
there have been no changes in the adjacent areas and if the applicant can document
that he/she has diligently worked towards use inauguration during the initial period of
time. The request for extension of this planned development permit must be made in
writing, at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date of the permit and must be
accompanied by applicable entitlement processing deposits.
5. Conditions of this entitlement may not be interpreted as permitting or requiring any
violation of law or any unlawful rules or regulations or orders of an authorized
governmental agency.
6. Should continued compliance with these Conditions of Approval not be met, the
Community Development Director may modify the conditions in accordance with
Municipal Code Section 17.44.100 and sections amendatory or supplementary
thereto, declare the project to be out of compliance, or the Director may declare, for
some other just cause, the project to be a public nuisance. The applicant shall be
liable to the City for any and all costs and expenses to the City involved in thereafter
abating the nuisance and in obtaining compliance with the Conditions of Approval or
applicable codes. If the applicant fails to pay all City costs related to this action, the
SACommunity Development\DEV PMTS\R P D\1998-01 Shea Mod 1\Resolutions\cc resolution 10 0317.doc
20
Resolution No. 2010-
Page 4
City may enact special assessment proceedings against the parcel of land upon
which the nuisance existed (Municipal Code Section 1.12.170).
7. The applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents,
officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City or its
agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval by the
City or any of its agencies, departments, commissions, agents, officers, or
employees concerning this entitlement approval, which claim, action or proceeding is
brought within the time period provided therefore in Government Code Section
66499.37 or other sections of state law as applicable and any provision amendatory
or supplementary thereto. The City will promptly notify the applicant of any such
claim, action or proceeding, and, if the City should fail to do so or should fail to
cooperate fully in the defense, the applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to
defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City or its agents, officers and employees
pursuant to this condition.
The City may, within its unlimited discretion, participate in the defense of any such
claim, action or proceeding if both of the following occur:
a. The City bears its own attorney fees and costs;
b. The City defends the claim, action or proceeding in good faith.
The applicant shall not be required to pay or perform any settlement of such claim,
action or proceeding unless the settlement is approved by the applicant. The
applicant's obligations under this condition shall apply regardless of whether a Final
Map is ultimately recorded with respect to the subdivision or a building permit is
issued pursuant to the planned development permit.
8. If any of the conditions or limitations of this approval are held to be invalid, that
holding does not invalidate any of the remaining conditions or limitations set forth.
9. All facilities and uses, other than those specifically requested in the application and
approval and those accessory uses allowed by the Municipal Code, are prohibited
unless otherwise permitted through application for Modification consistent with the
requirements of the zone and any other adopted ordinances, specific plans,
landscape guidelines, or design guidelines.
10. Prior to the approval of any Zoning Clearance for this entitlement the applicant shall
submit to the Community Development Department all outstanding entitlement case
processing fees, including all applicable City legal service fees. This payment must
be made within sixty (60) calendar days after the approval of this entitlement.
11. Prior to the issuance of any additional building permits, the applicant shall provide
cash surety in a form acceptable to the Community Development Director and City
Engineer/Public Works Director to comply with all conditions in the July 27, 2006
Agreement Regarding Conditions of Approval (Tract 5133) by and between the City
SACommunity Development\DEV PMTS\R P D\1998-01 Shea Mod 1\Resolubons\cc resolution 10 0317.doc
21
Resolution No. 2010-
Page 5
of Moorpark and Shea Homes Limited Partnership. Compliance shall be met on all
conditions prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction of the 68th
housing unit in Tract Map No. 5133, with the exception of the completion of Majestic
Court to Fremont Street to the east. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for
construction of the 68th housing unit in Tract Map No. 5133, the applicant shall
provide plans for the improvement and dedication of Majestic Court from the easterly
boundary of Tract 5133 to the existing terminus of Fremont Street to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer/Public Works Director, and consistent with the design standards
as shown on Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5425 as conditioned by Resolution
No. 2005-2304. Street improvements must be completed and an irrevocable offer of
dedication for public street purposes must be provided to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer/Public Works Director prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for
occupancy of the 73rd unit in Tract Map No. 5133, or December 31, 2010, whichever
occurs first. The developer shall disclose this condition in writing to any prospective
buyers for Units 73, 74, 75, 76 and 77 and provide the City with a written
acknowledgement from the buyer in a form acceptable to the City Manager and City
Attorney prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction of these units.
12. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction of the recreation area,
site and security plans shall be submitted for review and approval of the Moorpark
Police Department that incorporate appropriate CPTED (Crime Prevention Through
Environmental Design) features.
13. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction of the recreation area,
lighting plans shall be submitted for review by the City's Lighting Consultant to
ensure that lighting is in compliance with the standards of the Zoning Ordinance to
the satisfaction of the Community Development Director.
14. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction of the recreation area,
the applicant shall request that the City Council approve a resolution to enforce
California Vehicle Codes (CVC) on all private streets in Tract Map No. 5133 and
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5425, including Fremont Street as permitted by the
CVC. A $5,000 fee shall be provided to the City by the applicant with this request to
cover future costs of creating and operating a preferential parking district, should the
residents of Fremont Street wish to establish preferential resident parking in the
future.
15. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction of the 68th housing unit
in Tract Map No. 5133, the applicant shall obtain a building permit for construction of
the recreation area and tot lot. The recreation area plans must include a minimum
1,000 square-foot clubhouse/restroom building, minimum 1,000 square-foot pool,
wading pool, spa, deck area and tot lot, along with an eight (8) foot high wall on the
north property line, subject to the review and approval of the Community
Development Director. Improvements must be completed and available for use prior
to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for occupancy of the 73rd unit in Tract Map
SACommunity Development\DEV PMTS\R P D\1998-01 Shea I\Mod 1\Resolutions\cc resolution 10 0317.doc
22
Resolution No. 2010-
Page 6
No. 5133. The developer shall disclose this condition in writing to any prospective
buyers for Units 73, 74, 75, 76 and 77 and provide the City with a written
acknowledgement from the buyer in a form acceptable to the City Manager and City
Attorney prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction of these units.
16. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction of the 61st housing unit
in Tract Map No. 5133, the applicant shall provide the City with an irrevocable offer
of dedication for the public right-of-way along Los Angeles Avenue as required by
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5425 and shall enter an agreement with the City,
with the provision of either a cash security or lien on the Vesting Tentative Tract Map
No. 5425 property in a form acceptable to the City Manager and City Attorney, to
compensate the City for improvements to Los Angeles Avenue as required by
Vesting Tentative Tract Map No. 5425 as conditioned by Resolution No. 2005-2304
and Ordinance No. 313.
17. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction of the 61st housing unit
in Tract Map No. 5133, a permanent and irrevocable access easement shall be
provided along Millard Street south of Majestic Court to allow vehicular and
pedestrian access for construction, future occupants, and public agencies and
utilities for the approximately 1.34-'acre parcel owned by the City and/or
Redevelopment Agency on the west side of Millard Street (APN: 506-0-020-525),
subject to final wording approval by the City Manager and City Attorney.
18. Prior to the issuance of a Zoning Clearance for construction of the 68th housing unit
in Tract 5133, all fences/walls along the western lot boundary must be in place to the
satisfaction of the Community Development Director.
19. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for occupancy of the recreation area, the
Homeowners' Association rules for use of the recreation area must include
provisions that a.) the recreation area may not be reserved for any special event
other than a Homeowners' Association general meeting; b.) alcoholic beverages are
not permitted within the recreation area; and c.) the recreation area may only be
used between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 10:00 P.M. daily (The HOA may adopt
stricter time limits), and that routine maintenance will only be performed Monday
through Friday between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM. The time restrictions and prohibition
on alcoholic beverages must also be posted within the recreation area to the
satisfaction of the Community Development Director. Items a. b, and c can only be
changed by action of the City Council.
20. Prior to issuance of a Zoning Clearance for occupancy of the recreation area, the
parking spaces for the recreation area must be posted for "No Parking — Subject to
Tow Away" for the hours of 10:00 PM to 7:00 AM daily to the satisfaction of the
Community Development Director.
- End -
SAGommunity Development\DEV PMTS\R P D\1998-01 Shea Mod 1\Resolutions\cc resolution 10 0317.doc
23