HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2010 0519 CC REG ITEM 09A ITEM 9.A.
CITY OF MOORPARK,CALIFORNIA
City Council Meeting
of 5 - 10(_A010
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ",o t,o,,dZ4kA ..,r
AGENDA REPORT °e4lz4l�� •,�4r:
dal
TO: The Honorable City Council LP7.
FROM: Tom Kruse, Parks and Recreation Director
Prepared By: Jeremy Laurentowski, Landscape and Parks Superintendent
DATE: May 10, 2010 (CC Meeting of May 19, 2010)
SUBJECT: Consider Approval of College View Dog Park Proposed
Design Plan, Amenities and Budget
BACKGROUND
The southern most section of College View Park has been previously recommended
by the Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by the City Council for the
City's first dog park. The proposed site is completely within the existing Caltrans
right-of-way and consists of a passive turf area, mature eucalyptus and pine trees, an
unused turf volleyball court and parking.
Staff is proposing to install a dog park that will accommodate both small and large
breed dogs. The approximate 0.6 acre dog park will consist of two separate fenced-in
areas for unleashed play, with a separate staging area to prevent dogs entering the
park from interacting with dogs that are leaving. The dog park will consist of five foot
height chain link fencing, self shut-off hose bibs, bench seating, pet waste disposal
stations, trash receptacles and recycle bins, open play areas, and park rules signage.
Each dog area will be installed with a hose bib where owners can fill their dog's water
bowl. Staff has adequately sized the basins to minimize water intrusion into the
adjacent areas, keeping pedestrian access dry. The basins are also adequately sized
to allow for multiple water bowls to be placed within each basin.
In addition, staff is proposing to utilize the existing 5' height chain link fence on the
south and west side of the project site. The existing chain link fence was installed by
Caltrans and is currently used to discourage pedestrian access to Hwy 118 and the
west bound off-ramp/Collins Drive intersection. Staff has discussed utilizing the
existing fence as the dog park boundary with Caltrans and has received a verbal
approval for this proposed use.
8
Honorable City Council
May 13, 2010
Page 2
DISCUSSION
During the April 21, 2010 City Council meeting, staff proposed removing the existing
turf and replacing the turf with wood chips provided by the City's contract tree
trimming company. Several concerns were raised by Council in regards to the
recommended size of the wood chips, type of wood chips and if there were any
health concerns. Staff has contacted several veterinarians as well as other
landscape professionals in the field and has discovered that the opinions on this
matter vary greatly. Attachment E is a detailed summary of several phone interviews.
The following is a brief summary of staff's findings:
Size of wood chips: Larger wood chips were preferred in regards to a walking
surface. There was a concern that some small dogs may not enjoy running and
playing on wood chips. However, most dog parks that utilize wood chips do not
typically have the option of selecting the size of wood chips as they are generally
supplied by a local tree trimming company and utilize a variety of sizes in their parks.
The majority felt that wood chips were adequate, but there were better surface
options available.
Type of wood chips: No preference.
Health concerns: The majority did not think that there were any additional health
concerns with wood chips versus other surface options, as long as the wood chips
were replenished and the park was maintained regularly. Proper drainage was a
concern, as standing water may harbor disease. Several concerns with dogs eating
the wood chips were expressed and one City only uses small wood chips to minimize
the risk of dogs choking. Shredded bark mulch or small wood chips were the options
most felt would minimize any choking hazards. There was minimal concern that dogs
could injure themselves or get splinters walking or playing on wood chips.
Pet Waste: The majority felt that pet waste was more difficult to identify on wood
chips versus other surface options. However, most did not feel that this was an issue
as pet owners generally watch and pick up after their dog.
The following is a summary of the most common surface options for dog parks:
Surface Material Advantages Disadvantages
Wood Chips Low cost. Need to be replenished regularly
to minimize odors.
Difficult to identify pet waste.
Hard on small dog paws.
Artificial Turf Low maintenance. High installation cost.
High replacement cost (10-year
life).
Produces odors in summer heat.
9
Honorable City Council
May 13, 2010
Page 3
Surface gets hot in the summer.
Decomposed Granite Moderate Can get muddy if site does not
installation cost. drain adequately.
Low maintenance.
Meets ADA.
Low odor.
Turf Grass Low installation cost High maintenance cost.
Low odor. High water-use.
As discussed during the April 21s' City Council meeting, wood chips were preferred
by staff due to the low cost of the material, low maintenance and the reduction in
water-use due to the removal of the turf area. Staff determined that the City would
save approximately 840,000 gallons of water a year (approximately $5,200) and that
the maintenance cost that the City will save from reduced mowing and fertilization will
equal the increased maintenance costs associated with maintaining the dog park,
such as trash and waste removal and the occasional replenishing of wood chips.
Since the April 21 S' City Council meeting, staff has spent some time an the
proposed budget and has found an alternative surface material for the dog park, with
minimal impact to the overall project cost. Staff is convinced that decomposed
granite will alleviate any concerns associated with bark mulch and is proposing to
install this material for the dog park surface. Decomposed granite has become a
popular trend with dog parks. It is moderately affordable, permeable, does not harbor
odors or require water-use and is very easy to maintain. Decomposed granite has
several advantages as compared to natural dirt, such as efficient drainage, it
prevents weed growth and is aesthetically pleasing. The College View dog park area
also naturally drains to the southwest, which will help shed water and minimize
puddling.
FISCAL IMPACT
A summary of the costs associated with the surface material options are as follows:
Installation Cost: Wood Chips No direct costs (supplied by the City's
contract tree trimming company and
installed by City staff)
Estimated Annual Maintenance Cost None (staff time approx. 64 hours/year to
re lenish wood chips)
Installation Cost: Artificial Turf and Base $142,750 (base material installed by City
Material (4" aggregate base) staff)
Replacement Cost (10 years) $137,000 or $13,700/year
Estimated Annual Maintenance cost $500 water-use to clean turf monthly_
10
Honorable City Council
May 13, 2010
Page 4
Installation Cost: Decomposed Granite $11 ,850 (installed by City Staff)
Estimated Annual Maintenance cost $1,445 (Replenish DG and water-use to
minimize dust)_
Installation Cost: Turf Grass (New $6,500 (Installed by City Staff)
irrigation system and turf repair)
Estimated Annual Maintenance Cost $9,900 (Turf maintenance and water-use
Staff has prepared an estimated installation budget for the proposed project and has
determined that the $15,000 appropriated for the dog park by City Council in the FY
2009/2010 Park Improvement Zone 2 Fund is not sufficient for the standard program
elements required for the dog park. Staff has obtained cost estimates for the work to
be completed, plus desired amenities and has determined that the total estimated
cost of the dog park would be $50,594. (Refer to Attachment C for a detailed list of
costs):
ITEM DESCRIPTION TOTAL TOTAL (/21)
Planting Repair turf $480.00 $480.00
Irrigation Cap and adjust as necessary $500.00 $500.00
Fencing 5' height chain link (Bid) $14,676.00 $16,476.00
DG Surface 3" Depth $11,850.00 $6,487.50
Waste Stations Powder coated— Qty 7 $3,990.00 $3,990.00
Trash Receptacles Concrete— Qty 3 $2,289.00 $2,289.00
Recycle Bins Concrete — Qty 2 $1,642.00 $1,642.00
Signage Baked enamel $500.00 $500.00
Hose Bibs Self shut-off w/ sump drain $1,520.00 $1,520.00
Benches Concrete— Qty 5 $4,715.00 $7,126.00
Sub-Total $42,162.00 $41,010.50
20% Contingency $8,432.40 $8,202.60
Project Total $50,594.40 $49,212.50
The cost reductions required to help equal the additional costs associated with the
increased amount of decomposed granite paving, as compared to the budget
prepared for the April 21 St City Council meeting, are as follows:
• Installation of five (5) benches as compared to seven (7). ($2,411 savings)
• Staff has discovered 600 linear feet of chain link fencing in storage that was
removed from the Poindexter Park Expansion Project. Staff proposes to utilize
this fence and has obtained a revised bid from the fencing contractor. ($1 ,800
savings)
With the exception of the chain link fencing, all other amenities will be installed by
City Staff. Staff has determined that a total of 180 labor hours will be required to
install the dog park, as compared to 148 labor hours proposed during the April 21St
11
Honorable City Council
May 13, 2010
Page 5
City Council meeting. The additional 32 hours will be required to spread the
increased amount of decomposed granite as compared to bark mulch. The
installation of decomposed granite will require the removal of existing grade to 3"
depth, the installation of additional header board and the surface will need to be
compacted with a compacting roller to encourage drainage.
The Park Improvement Zone 2 Fund (2112) has a total of $138,996 appropriated in
the current fiscal year for the design and construction of handball wall ($25,000) at
Campus Canyon Park, which was inadvertently carried over from the FY 08/09
budget when the ball wall project was moved to Zone 3 and the following
improvement projects at College View Park: basketball court lighting project
($23,996), dog park ($15,000) and replacement of tot lot equipment and swings
($75,000). The basket ball court lighting project was completed under budget in
2009 with $5,016 in savings. To date, there is $119,850 available appropriation for
the remaining projects as $19,146 was utilized for the basketball court lighting project
completed in 2009.
Staff recommends utilizing the surplus $5,016 from the Basketball Court Lighting
Project, the $15,000 appropriated for the dog park and $30,578 from the fund to
replace the tot lot equipment. Staff has obtained informal bids for the new tot lot
equipment and has determined that the remaining balance of $44,422 will be
sufficient to replace the tot lot equipment this fiscal year.
At the beginning of the current year, Park Improvement Zone 2 Fund (2112) reported
a $122,728 fund balance surplus. It is estimated to receive $1,000 in revenues and
incur about $113,996 in expenditures by year end. The expenditures include the
total project cost of the dog park. The projected fund balance surplus at the end of
the year is $9,732. Staff has determined that there are not any additional funding
sources anticipated to increase the Park Improvement Zone 2 Fund in the future. No
increase in appropriation is requested.
Upon approval by City Council on the College View Dog Park proposed design plan,
amenities and budget, staff anticipates completion of the dog park during the last
week of July.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1. Approve the College View Dog Park proposed design plan, amenities, and
2. Approve the budget and use of funds from the Park Improvement Zone 2 Fund.
Attachment A— Proposed Dog Park Design Plan
Attachment B — Proposed Dog Park Amenities
Attachment C — Preliminary Budget
Attachment D — Interview Summary
12
ATTACHMENT A
COLLEGE VIEW PARK - DOG PARK
PROPOSED DOG PARK DESIGN PLAN EXISTING PARKING
NEW DG WALKWAY
BENCH DOG PARK ACCESS ui
5'HT.CHAINLINK FENCE MAINTENANCE ACCESS GATE GATE
Z
RECYCLE BIN w
TRASH RECEPTACLE DECOMPOSED GRANITE DOG PARK RULES
SURFACE SIGN >
HOSE BIB W/SELF SHUT-OFF, U
GRAVEL BASIN AND SUMP DRAIN PET WASTE DOG PARK ACCESS <
PET WASTE DISPOSAL STATION GATE W
IDISPOSAL STATION w
IDENCH >
1 W -'
0 U
294'-9^ W
q.
J
J
O
U
. ENTER
(LARGE BREEDS) w tt
LARGE BREED DOG PARK ;.EXIT m
. EXIT,
/7
PET WASTE
n
DISPOSAL STATION -t�---Q-
SMALL BREED DOG PARK
,.,...
ENCH
RASH RECEPTACLE
BENCH PET WAS ECYCLE BIN
DISPOSAL STATION DECOMPOSED GRANITE
TRASH RECE TACLE PET WAST SURFACE
NANiN
BENCH DISPOSAL TATION PET WASTE pRT}{
DISPOSAL STATION
HOSE BIB /SELF
S IB W/SELF SHUT-OFF, SHUT-OF , VEL BASIN SCREE N.T.S.
RAV BASIN AND SUMP DRAIN AND SU P DR N
--- --- -------------- --- ---------------- --- --------- ----- ----------- EAEE MAY 10,2010
MAINTENANCE ACCESS GATE
DEPOSAL HWY 23 OFFRAMP
DISPOSAL STATION -
City o �raopar
799 MOORPARK AVE
MOORPARK CA,93021
PREPARED BY:JEREMY LAURENTOWSKI
PARKSIANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT
W
ATTACHMENT B: 1 OF 2
COLLEGE VIEW PARK - DOG PARK
PROPOSED SITE AMENITIES
Y
;M� y �s Ves,�•
" g
Q911, z
PET STATION WASTE DISPOSAL
COLOR: GREEN
14
ATTACHMENT B: 2 OF 2
COLLEGE VIEW PARK — DOG PARK
PROPOSED SITE AMENITIES
Fl Monte
y
Q1 EM84 B
CONCRETE BENCH
COLOR: NATURAL GRAY W/LIGHT SANDBLAST FINISH
Gm
"ja Ua I
.m
919111 111 '
iJ,ihi ,Ilq s !I I I I:It''I
CONCRETE TRASH RECPETACLE AND RECYCLE BIN
COLOR: NATURAL GRAY W/LIGHT SANDBLAST FINISH
ATTACHMENT C 5/12/2010
COLLEGE VIEW PARK - DOG PARK
Preliminary Budget
PLANTING
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
Turf Existing - repair 1 $ 480.00 c.y. $ 480.00
PLANTING SUB-TOTAL: $ 480.00
IRRIGATION
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
Cap&adjust Existing -cap/adjust/replace as needed 1 $ 500.00 ea $ 500.00
(budget allowance -scope TBD)
IRRIGATION SUB-TOTAL: $ 500.00
HARDSCAPE &AMENITIES
ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT PRICE TOTAL
Chain Link Fence 750 If. -5' ht. galv. chain link fence 1 $ 14,676.00 ea $ 14,676.00
(6) 5' ht. x 4'width chain link gates
(4) S ht. x 5'width chain link gates
(Contractor Bid)
DG Surface 3" depth (tax and delivery incl.) 30000 $ 0.34 s.f. $ 10,200.00
DG Header 1x4 recycled plastic 1100 $ 1.50 I.f. $ 1,650.00
Dog Waste Station Product Cost (tax and shipping incl.) 7 $ 515.00 ea $ 3,605.00
Concrete footing 7 $ 55.00 ea $ 385.00
Trash Receptacle Product Cost (tax and shipping incl.) 3 $ 698.00 ea $ 2,094.00
4' x4' conc. pad w/reinforcement 3 $ 65.00 ea $ 195.00
Recycle Bin Product Cost (tax and shipping incl.) 2 $ 756.00 ea $ 1,512.00
4' x4'conc. pad w/reinforcement 2 $ 65.00 ea $ 130.00
Park Signage (budget allowance) 1 $ 500.00 ea $ 500.00
Hose Bib Hose Bib (self shut-off) w/riser&valve 3 $ 225.00 ea $ 675.00
32 I.f. 6" conc. curb w/reinforcement 3 $ 95.00 ea $ 285.00
4'x4" gravel sump & basin w/filter fabric 3 $ 130.00 ea $ 390.00
410 I.f. i" pvc pipe w/connection fittings 1 $ 170.00 ea $ 170.00
Bench Product Cost (tax and shipping incl.) 5 $ 943.00 ea $ 4,715.00
HARDSCAPE SUB-TOTAL: $41,182.00
SUB-TOTAL $42,162.00
20% CONTINGENCY $ 8,432.40
TOTAL: $50,594.40
16
Estimated Staff Labor Cost
PLANTING
ITEM DESCRIPTION STAFF HOURS
Turf Remove turf, grade and replace w/bark chips 24.00
IRRIGATION
ITEM DESCRIPTION STAFF HOURS
Cap&adjust Cap, adjust and replace as needed 12.00
HARDSCAPE &AMENITIES
ITEM DESCRIPTION STAFF HOURS
DG surface Remove grade to 3"depth, install header, dg &compact 64.00
Waste Stations Install w/concrete footing (Qty (7) @ 3 hours each) 21.00
Trash Receptacles Form, install concrete,finish & install receptacle (Qty (3) @ 3 hrs. ea.) 9.00
Recycle Bins Form, install concrete,finish & install recycle bin (Qty (2) (—W 3 hrs. ea.) 6.00
Park Signage Install on chain link fence 2.00
Hose Bibs Remove grade, install water connection and hose bib 21.00
Install gravel sump drain and basin w/filter fabric (Qty (3) @ 7 hrs. ea.)
Benches Form, install concrete, finish & install bench (Qty (7) @ 3 hrs. ea.) 21.00
TOTAL STAFF HOURS 180.00
HOURLY RATE: $25.00
TOTAL LABOR COST: $ 4,500.00
17
ATTACHMENT D
Summary of phone interviews:
Member of the Ohlone Dog Park Association and retired veterinarian:
Established in 1979, the Ohlone Dog Park was one of the first dog parks built in
California and the Association was incorporated in 1986 as a California non-profit
educational corporation. The City of Berkeley currently supplies the park with
wood chips provided by their contract tree trimming company and according to a
member of the Association, the only disadvantages with utilizing wood chips is
that they decompose over time and the park does not receive enough chips to
constantly replenish the ground surface. Because of this, it gets somewhat
muddy during the winter and patchy dirt is exposed quite often. Larger chips are
easier for the dogs to play and run on and there does not seem to be any
additional health risks to using chips versus other surface options. There is a
possibility that a dog could swallow a large chip. As far as pet waste removal,
people pick up after their pets and it has not been a problem.
City of San Jose, Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Services: The City of
San Jose currently has eight dog parks in operation. Each dog park is different
in design and several utilize an alternate surface material such as wood chips,
decomposed granite or artificial turf. The parks with wood chips have not been
as successful as other surface options as they need to be replenished frequently
or they will tend to harbor odors. Most pet owners are more attracted to the
parks with artificial turf or decomposed granite. However the cost of artificial turf
is very high and it still requires maintenance to keep clean. Dog waste can be
difficult to remove at times and it can harbor odors in the summer heat.
Decomposed granite seems to be a popular trend. It is affordable, permeable,
has low odor and is very easy to maintain.
City of Laguna Niguel, Public Works Department: The City of Laguna Niguel
utilizes small wood chips similar to those found in tot-lot play areas as there is a
concern that dogs may eat the chips. The City has not had many complaints
from residents about the use of chips.
Local Veterinarian (Simi Valley): Dog parks are wonderful places for dog to
interact and play. In regards to wood chips, there are no concerns with splinters
or any concerns with dogs becoming injured from running and playing on the
material. However, some dogs may have a taste for certain vegetation and may
try to eat the chips. In order to minimize any injury from swallowing wood chips,
shredded mulch or small wood chips would be a better option than large wood
chips.
Local Veterinarian (Moorpark): Does not recommend taking dogs to a dog park.
There is an uncertainty as to the health of other dogs and he has seen dogs
come into his office injured from fights. In regards to wood chips, there is a
18
concern about dogs eating wood chips and possible splinters in their paws. This
particular veterinarian has never been to a dog park.
Local Veterinarian (Thousand Oaks): The origin of the chips is a concern as they
may contain dangerous chemicals or may have been treated in some way.
Some plants are also toxic and if a dog eats the plant it may become ill. Wood
chips may also cause a penetration through the skin and it could become
infected. Only vary rarely have any of these issues ever been observed at this
particular practice.
Local Veterinarian (Thousand Oaks): He does not see any issues with using
wood chips. Wood chips will most likely not injure the dog any more than taking
a dog on a walk around the neighborhood might. Chips keep the ground clean
and absorb water making the walking surface easier to transverse. He does not
feel that there is a concern with the dogs eating the chips. Dogs tend to eat odd
things when they are left alone. This could happen as easily in your own back
yard as anywhere else. However, dogs in a dog park are usually too pre-
occupied playing and interacting with other dogs to start looking around for odd
things to eat.
19