HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2010 0721 CC REG ITEM 10G ITEM 10.G.
v OF MOORPARK,CALIFOhRNI'-
City Council Meeting
of_ 7-AI-AyiO
ACTION:
'y
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL T.
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Yugal K. Lail, City Engineer/Public Works Director
DATE: June 2, 2010 (CC Meeting of 07/21/10)
SUBJECT: Consider Approval of the Annual Seven-Year Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) for Department of Public Works for FY 2009/10 — FY
2015/16
OVERVIEW
On a yearly basis the City is required to update the seven-year Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) for Department of Public Works. Staff has prepared
the June 2010 final draft of the CIP for FY2009/10 — FY 2015/16 and has
distributed that document to the City Council by separate Memo. This staff report
summarizes the recommended changes from last year's CIP.
DISCUSSION
A. General Description / Purpose
The CIP sets forth a list of planned municipal improvement projects for the City's
Department of Public Works. Proposed improvements for parks, buildings and
facilities are not included. Also, costs for general public works maintenance
programs (i.e. street marking, striping, regulatory signs, tree trimming, etc.) are not
included in this program as this type of Public Works Operations and Maintenance
expense is set forth in the annual Departmental Operating Budget.
The purpose and focus of the City's CIP is to provide the City Council with a tool
for planning and programming major public works capital improvement projects
related to streets and roads, over the next several years.
S\Publ c Works\EveryonekReporimStaff Reports\2010Vuly\7-21-10 7 Year CIP tloc 85
Honorable City Council
July 21, 2010
Page 2
B. Changes from Last Year
1. The June 2010 CIP includes a new list of Potential Objectives as identified in
Appendix 'G'.
2. Projects 113 (Moorpark Road Dual Left Turn Lanes [8075]), 205 (Lassen
Walkway [80741), and 403 (Medians: Tierra Rejada Road [8042]), listed in the
April 2008 CIP have been completed and have, therefore, been deleted from
the CIP. Project 406 (Median: Mt. Trail Street — Cedar Springs Street to Mt.
Meadow Drive) has been included with Project 128 (Mt. Trail Street Pavement
Rehabilitation/Median [8083]) and thus deleted. Section 'O' of this report lists
the completed projects which have been added to Appendix `I' of the CIP.
C. Committee Review and Input
On April 21, 2010, the Transportation and Public Works Committee (TPWC),
(Councilmembers Millhouse and Van Dam), reviewed a draft copy of the subject
document. It was recommended that the Potential Objectives, as recommended
by the TPWC, be included in the CIP (Appendix 'III'). Those changes were
incorporated into the final draft which was forwarded to the Planning Commission
for comment.
D. Planning Commission Review
Section 65401 of the Government Code of the State of California requires the
Planning Commission to review the City's Capital Improvement Program each
year, for the purpose of reporting to the City Council on the conformity of said
document with the City's General Plan. On May 21, 2010, the final draft of the
subject document was presented to the Moorpark Planning Commission for such
action. The Planning Commission found the subject CIP to be in conformance
with the Circulation Element of the Moorpark General Plan.
E. Seven Year Program / Congestion Management Program
The subject CIP provides for the planning and programming of projects over a
seven year period. In this way the CIP is compatible with the Ventura County
Transportation Commission's (VCTC) Congestion Management Program (CMP).
The CMP requires a seven-year projection of projects which might enhance the
traffic capacity on any street on the CMP Roadway Network. A map of the CMP
network and a chart listing the projects on that network, are listed in Section 'D' of
the CIP.
S\Publ c Works\EveryonelReportsl,Staff Reports\2010Uuly\7-21-10 7 Year CIP doc 86
Honorable City Council
July 21, 2010
Page 3
F. Priorities and Planninq
The funding year shown for each project listed in the CIP is an indication of its
relative priority. Should the Council wish to recommend project priorities different
from those set forth in the draft document prepared by staff, it may do so.
G. Year 2009/10: Budget Consistency
The first year of the subject CIP is Fiscal Year 2009/10. The funding amounts and
sources cited in the CIP for FY 2009/10 are consistent with the adopted FY
2009/10 Budget, revised to reflect actual FY 2008/09 carryover appropriations.
H. GASB-34
City staff monitors and maintains an Infrastructure Valuation Program consistent
with the requirements of the Government Accounting Standards Board Statement
No. 34 (GASB-34). The initial analysis which established the valuation of the
City's infrastructure, inventoried, quantified, categorized and valued (replacement
cost estimate) all of the City's capital assets. The current updated valuation
amount for the City's infrastructure assets, is over $225 million, with "street-
related" improvements valued at over$70 million.
I. Moorpark Redevelopment Agency
Projects identified in the CIP include projects proposed to be funded by the
Moorpark Redevelopment Agency (MRA). Approval of those projects and
necessary funding appropriations will be submitted to the MRA as needed.
J. Program Content
In addition to known projects planned to be constructed by either the City, the
MRA or private developers, a number of projects have been included in the CIP in
order to fully address the needs described in certain infrastructure planning
documents, noted as follows:
1. Circulation Element. All of the "future" arterial and collector streets identified
in the Circulation Element of the Moorpark General Plan, have been included
in the program.
2. Master Drainage Study. All of the "future" drains identified in the 1995 Master
drainage Study, have also been included in the program.
S\Public Works\Everyone\Reports\Staff Reports\2010Uuly\7-21-10 7 Year CIP doc 87
Honorable City Council
July 21, 2010
Page 4
K. Program Format
The projects listed in the CIP are organized into five categories listed as follows:
• Streets (including underground utility projects);
• Trails and Walkways;
• Traffic Signals;
• Medians and Parkways; and
• Storm Drains.
In the 'Introduction' there is a total program cost summary broken down into these
five (5) categories of projects.
L. Program Cost Estimate
Section 'A' of the CIP provides a general introduction to the program and includes
a listing of the total program cost estimate (exceeding $46 million), summarized as
follows:
Estimated
Section Program Cost($)
100 Streets 27,147,436
200 Trails/Walkways 855,765
300 Traffic Signals 980,384
400 Medians& Parkways 748,204
500 Storm Drains 16,345,000
Total 46,076,789
M. Project Descriptions
Section '13' of the CIP sets forth a "Project Description" page for each project. The
information provided on each Project Description page includes estimated project
costs, recommended funding year and recommended funding sources.
It should be noted that no detailed preliminary engineering was proposed for the
projects listed. The cost estimates are, therefore, very preliminary and will be
subject to change as the full scope and requirements of each project are
developed.
N. Program Expenditure Summary
Section 'C' of the CIP sets forth a table listing all projects in the CIP along with
total estimated project costs for each fiscal year of the program.
S\Public Works\Everyone\Reports\Statt ReportsX2010Uuty\7.21-10 7 Year CIP doc 88
Honorable City Council
July 21, 2010
Page 5
O. Past Projects
In order to document past projects, Appendix 'I' of the CIP lists all known major
Capital Improvement projects (for the Public Works Department) constructed since
the City's incorporation in 1983. The following projects were added to Appendix `I':
2010
Streets & Trails
• Moorpark Road Dual Left Turn Lanes
• Lassen Bikeway/Walkway
Parkways & Medians
• Tierra Rejada Road Medians
P. Funding Sources: Definitions
Attached as Appendix 'II' is a listing of the major funding sources for the program,
along with a description for each.
Q. Conclusion
The subject CIP is designed to serve many purposes.
• It is a budget planning document.
• It is a funding source reference.
• It is a plan for future improvements.
• It is a list of infrastructure needs.
• It sets forth the scope and estimated cost of specific projects.
• It is a tool for prioritizing and scheduling capital improvement projects.
• It provides a list of projects already completed.
• It provides a list of potential projects.
• It documents compliance with requirements of the Congestion Management
Program.
• Additionally, it is a "hands-on" working reference document to identify, define
and describe future planned capital improvement projects.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Approve the updated CIP for FY 2009/10— FY 2015/16.
S\Public Works\Everyone\Reports\Statt Reports\2010Uuly\7-21-10 7 Year CIP.doc 89