Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
AGENDA REPORT 2010 1013 CC SPC ITEM 06A
ITEM 6.A. CITY OF MOORPARK,CALIFORNIA City Council Meeting MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL of ID-/3 ��oIO AGENDA REPORT ACTION: TO: The Honorable City Council eY FROM: Hugh R. Riley, Assistant City Mana er DATE: October 11, 2010 (CC Special Meeting of October 13, 20 SUBJECT: Consider Proposed Revisions to the Campus Master Plan and Building Site Design Concept for New Civic Center and City Hall BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION One of the City Council's top ten priority projects is the development of a new Civic Center and City Hall. In 2005, the City Council selected GKK Works, Architects (GKK) for the design of the new Civic Center and City Hall. As a result a Preliminary Campus Master Plan and Building Site Design (Master Plan) for the new permanent facility on High Street was prepared and presented to the City Council on June 21, 2006 (Attachment 1). The Master Plan included a two-story city hall building that incorporated the existing library with some minor expansion and an option to relocate the library in the future. The original plan also featured a structure crossing over High Street and joining additional space on the south side of the street. The City Council reviewed the conceptual plan and established an Ad Hoc Committee (Councilmember Millhouse and former Mayor Hunter) to work with the architect and staff to incorporate Council suggestions into the design. When the City Council reorganized in December 2006, Councilmember Mikos replaced Councilmember Millhouse on the Ad Hoc Committee. After the City took operational control of the Library in January 2007 and following discussions with the Ad Hoc Committee, GKK was directed to include an option for a new City Library into the Master Plan. As a result, a revised plan was presented to the City Council at a special meeting on May 16, 2007, and approved (Attachment 2). The May 16, 2007, Master Plan abandoned the structure over High Street and included a future, two-story library in an L-shaped configuration joining the City Hall to form a center courtyard facing east. On July 18, 2007, the City Council authorized an additional $1,140,031 in design fees requested by GKK for the design of a new Library however little if any of these funds have been expended as the design phase did not proceed. Additional optional fees for a water feature, interior furniture design and selection and for LEED Certification services totaling $168,750 at the City Manager's discretion were also authorized for the project. Honorable City Council October 11, 2010 Page 2 In the fall of 2007 the City conducted a voter opinion survey. The results of the survey confirmed Moorpark voter's probable unwillingness to support a ballot measure that would raise the necessary funds to build a new City Library of sufficient size to meet the City's current needs. Without funding for a new City Library it was necessary to reconsider planning for a new building. During 2008 and early 2009, staff met with GKK to discuss and analyze the feasibility of an expansion of the existing library. Also, as a cost saving measure, a single story plan was developed using more of the site space while maintaining a courtyard configuration surrounded by the buildings. During the same time, staff worked with the architects to update and finalize the building program based on the City's potential staffing needs. During 2009, revised plans were developed including the proposed new Post Office and adjacent parking facilities which were to be designed to complement the plans for the Civic Center. GKK prepared three alternative building and site schematics based on the library expansion. The other elements of the Master Plan are relatively the same as the May 16, 2007, Plan. Staff is now prepared to present several alternative plan schemes for the City Hall and City Library as well as an expanded Campus Master Plan that includes the new Post Office and possible use of property that may be acquired from the Essex Partnership as part of their proposed multi-family housing project. Council has previously been provided under separate cover, with the three alternate Site and Floor Plan Concept Schemes (A, B, and C) which represent the current options proposed for the City Council's consideration. GKK will be available to present the pros and cons for each alternative Scheme and review the LEED Basis for Design Report which was also distributed last Friday. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Discuss and consider alternative site and floor plan schemes and direct staff and architect accordingly. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Campus Master Plan Presented in June 21, 2006 2. Campus Master Plan Presented in May 16, 2007 3. Existing Scheme with Post Office Added - Ilt+�• - I ADULT CENTER \ I Z I I I i yt J, ' 160 SWIS O 63 Stoll. ILI•.41 LH I l 1 1 ___' `• r� –O 2! Stalls L_ I •I r-- - I U___rj� I I 1 •I • I . • 69 Stalts I - Ll I 1 Eovrtyva • Q I a I �- , ■ --------- ------ 1 yI •I / �� �1 •1 1 `, MION 6711!E7 •I � !•� v.'r.� I 11 1 � •I 1 I I 1 1`� ' • 2na 1-1oY tst Vt— – 66 STALLS - City of Moorpark - Campus Master Plan ON Hall and Civic Center ATTACHMENT I C.) 6611 Stalls 2, I o 65 Stalls `-••-' �^ Existing Ubrary I I ti, I• 1 24 Stalls L--- p {`L✓ P 1 ' •1 o I{� o M1 � o I I : v J 69 Stalts I _ I 1 ro 3- j ; • j O W w - • I 1 - I Courtyard �. c W • r Z •I � • Z' a i I I r' ' I v r-------- I ti C • • I y =-f - --- - I---- }- -o I i 1 I • 1 s; - I 1 I I NIpN 11TII8ET .I •I I I II I - - -------- --- 2nd door - / Ist Floor • I I I r11 o o ;I it 66 STALLS •o I 1- City of Moorpark - Campus Master Plan - City Hall and Civic Center � ` I I 11 I I � I � 1` E06TNIG l I ADMINISTRAMIN j \\ BUILDING , I / j 160 3kk I I \ I � I 1�' I I 4 I ACTIVE ADULT CENTER ` III I I I r coMMuNl7v CENTER II r ll II I I I I I I + I I J 0 °asT'"'°LIBRARY [-- �J 9 12 Sle s j 13 Sk I 1 -------------L J _—— PWIC W01 Icb�.. ice`♦ ----- LZRARY ?— ———60 Stalls r- l l I I 0 011" IU LIBRARY I o < 0 IL yy �—� 9 vim' �— �-- Y 1 I o I I_I I I I I I o_ O I I I I I• � I 11 t P.aR f / 'lIOiA PART AL— � I H I G H S T R E E T ............ -- --.....----— — 1 400 . ., �f "� o 0 0 f o �� � �. � �t �� C n n ° ° o y. ° l� 76 STALLS �. - D t l7 I i n - 2 City of Moorpark- Campus Master Plan- Civic Center Z Y N t. ,n a I - —� ,� EXISTING UBRARY I I I 1 91 s 42 Stella 13 Stalls L 1-/ r__, a. Administrall"Servloes I --T I r' Pubk Waft r City Engineer LIBRARY I I -J r ----- - -- .rte LIBRARY I / 1 ° 89 Stalls r J i i i i i i i o ,�^-'' " � •� j � i ,� i rr n�.r i i € i"' I I I I i t I I I I I O _� �•_ y _ I: o �I -' I - 1' 1 I b I 8 0 �+ �� � W Finance I I I o 1"t------ -----t------T------FI o r") ,,; 4 -.�--,-- = I ' -- --6 6 I I I I I I LIBRARY ��.� � I I �I '�- tJ I I I I o r � I I I i I I 0 IL Cc '..!-I I i....._ � '._11 - —I I--- --� 2 0. I City Coundl d City Manager i I -. Servkss I�"',ol°., 1 <-•+ 8 1 i r_-- 'v. �' PA R \ 'NOT A PART' °, - _ ���•� .I --� HIGH STREET • d 2nd Floor Plan tt 0 ' D ° ° ✓ 4 ° r ° o V ^� 0 I I� L� ® 78 STALLS ? SCHEME A City of Moorpark - Campus Master Plan - Civic Center , , � I °Fs M NI G A I j �tiFO DM�VISTRATIpN 1 y BUILDING 1 q� 1 ~� ` 160 Stalls I I II `` I ` ACTIVE ADULT CENTER /COMMUNITY CENTER 1 1 _ I EXISTING LIBRARY ' 47 Starts 13 Stalls a O I I 1 ------------ j ��. 1 1 LIBRARY 69 Stalls I I•'�. � � I I B .� 1 .. .. S s.I.y — _ 3 .:: r---- I 4 1 I r- 1 I 4 I LIBRARY 8 ACRE PARCEL . •� -- .__ I .� 6 R I y I I I 'not A. HIGH OTR99T to � �- �L.✓' I J I_L L 000 j IF FRH' City of Moorpark - City Center Site Plan .w EXISTING SCHEME ATTACHMENT 3 �a , . 1 I . ..-...— OD > I C) 0 X M 7) 1 > X M... 1 1 I r- _ 1_ .., 1 1 1 - 1 — I , - 1 , 0 :4 S' . L1, 0 0 1 0 I ' 'I,, ■ A ..., PUBLIC PARKING o co ---", fir ) k: &p . to' ° C" ... 4., .11. = /7 _ r-i- 44 = __,'- ,,,__ C ., aZ:ED 0 ......,....,_. _....„.......,./1. a . - 1 ° . /7 r _ K . 0 f.k.‘„,,,,,‘. ,,,,,,..24:.;., .../•'i.-4 ,,,•„+.7.W,^' :,*g.e.V ''''';'la'rp'';';..;;1"g-7.i':*;.01 0#••el•.°;-,,,-,v0-4e41Y4 4f.,<1.6.14%),t?:',44.444.444 0`"e' 0 eig4, '‘,... '.4aVti W....•1‘ ••44. .4.40. t 1;1>. 4,1,.r.„‘,„, > 4 44', 1 o .://f)14'''' ‘,4'4•;',"° IP ——— ,". ',',4 ''''''''''''''''''''4''''''' '''''''''t/,,.....,(,.‘7.4.N, t° 0 1 " ,4,7?.',..•"".."'V'...,'.-.7,7..,4V,.'440.e-m..,..04r.,.... -.5:4, ,;... tifdlaitif.\,-, '', ''',,,44.:.•4_4,4'.4,`„,-',/, -4ii4",NONV,44t*-*..44N34K wall: ^7". tg.) monit "1:::, kigi;g1k•Stf4,141,.4,4 0 1,§Aca4;"1, k 7,,,,,-/;,,- ,.$5,X.1,..7, 0 ' ° k„,,,,akt-zo' ,,,,•A.. ° X ;1) . I of", %,,,,*„„ m.,,,..f...'(*. 5''',V4i■..'"'''' '''..4( .0,,,, \ A•,T,^4,. \\\,....4,1,,,.. / cs /s4..110,014,/j', ''•;3 X 1 ° ' ,%PrIAY•.' ''''' . P '..44A..°ilz/ \\ .' ° o 1 ED d 0 ,P,,V... ,,,%. ,•,,, „,,,..., ,•,...(4•', . , ...,,'. .",*74",''‘...4 I .o. ...,..^ " ^•, .. 1 0 * 474",•, . ,?.. s ..gam 0 s ° ,... I (/) ° I ,t;•"''' i,,r; ' a , ,I.: 4,,,,, ,, ••<•,,,' -11-• - < ,,,,.•"*.,, ,,..:, ,, , N 4, I i,„4....40\4■4 4,k,,,. o ,.'.. .....ky r, 4.,..'1 ''"■■■ 1 = -"II. I •+ 1 I i 1 1 • ,Avitil M '', o 4 t 1 , ..7:i..„ 1.-A • ° 0 0 „,', ,,, ,,,•„; ,... Frn 0 0 0 . 1 1 it CD , ■ c —4 4....4...-0.. ■ 1 1 1 1 1 = r..fm • ,,,,,,;,,-,,,, l,„3„,,,,„. (1) , II 0 ■1 I, + 4 — h _J ,- - ••• 4' ■Ri 4 ., , ,> ,, 4 1 v.:1.N,, , sit.. ,,,,' • 4,,,,,,,,,,,, , . I ',*,,,0,4,,O,,,,,"''‘'. ^,a4 .k';',,, ‘,..Z:,,,;,,,,,f,i,,,,,,,' , (1) , . 111' H ..,,,.4:4,<"S4,....:„ , •' ',•x,s;• 444*e..-,-s ,4 0.44.A...„,.4..; .00 ,. -..• ,.4,4,.,44 •. ,, 10......0,0-4,„,„- , , -4,4 •• 4.?„.4/4- • , , . t.... nr, 0 i Pi ,,..X.,%'' , • , •s„),.1 f,„, ;•„,,,l,, • ' ,,,,,,,. ° r,1.,,-. ,,, , ,o,„ <‘.1' < • •.,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 4,,,,,,gt„,,,,/„,,1 V...,0,.',, :4,:,;NM'',,••,' ' ,., --,liNk,„;1* (1) I 3,. to ra,v2,4:*41v4m0k.d.14,4,....,,,t0r....,,,,,,,,,_ •....<0,„...... _____,..,..>„ i 11 1 'CI 0 1 1 1- Landscape Berm 0.) I L I ) m = I I \s„,.....2... -1 1 1 W o 0 0 o o X C/1 '.,• 1 2 ...."”) _.1 _ I.... 1____ ME (1131B1 xi 1- €111111 Ur:11) -...... --.....,_ 11111:1) __ _ MOORPARK AVENUE --r 0; g . 2:1 m I -1 C C C C.) Cr QPaK c44 o P/ `.�Z CITY OF MOORPARK loW 7 ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE ,liti AVM. ....,,, INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 0,,,,,, i Og1T13 ,Jay DATE: October 8, 2010 TO: The Honorable City Council COPY: Steve Kueny, City Manager • FROM: Hugh Riley, Assistant City Mana DATE: October 8, 2010 (CC Special Meeting of October 13, 2010) SUBJECT: Civic Center Materials for Review at Special City Council Meeting Attached are three alternate Site and Floor Plan Concept Schemes (A, B, and C) which represent the current options for the City Council's consideration. GKK will be available to present the pros and cons for each alternative Scheme. Previously the City Council directed that the new Civic Center be a LEED Certified Building. On November 20, 2009 staff provided the City Council with a report on the proposed LEED Design Criteria for the facility. The Report is attached for review. A complete Agenda Report with background information and a recap of Council action for the project to date will be delivered on Monday evening. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Alternative Site and Floor Plan Schemes A, B, and C. 2. LEED Certification- Basis of Design Report ATTACHMENT 1 a o e `\\lie w \I ' r ^\V 11ji 0 CD 1 o * 1 6 O E. h u o kG 9 0 0 I ID o d >4104F' �' n) \ : a s',1t At 4$k 4111 0 i c<f' o I I r 0 9 �, I! r ;fit � CD V Fit M w O O s Y' 40 4 : *Ali 0 ,- (A mm 0 y n m to o i 0 \ s s : 1.1 s 011 1:. I L- I 4-® -► w• .1i=: .. .... — J r_ _ _ _• 14 011011 0 ` 3 ill* u _ _ � i_lfui.;,,:: F J g 1 � ��, Ey I N ,Ial// m N ti1 4 Ili © 'A ''' n �9F 1 r-44... � k-: $,'"',� �:,�if IOU a �� 3 ! +� 4 H 1 ° • / r Q $ o �° o-0F I IIt ill Ii 1 g �� ,. O f,:....; , L. 8 i.,..i.„;:,....,,.„,:,,,.,„ 9 1/ _ I 1, ME r fit ilill j I. 1 o ' ; , 'c l ,--_--' Lam :' ° a oog I + ,A� t NN I —r- 3111 1 VIIII >. ►. v o o w w wr w� a o .,1 i s °gi I I ° 0 ., ' _ - .. IIIIIIIIIIIIII � 1 i #g _ III°I®II�IIII Rule �*� $ IlflIIIIII( �� / ,Ii I .... ,.. . _ _ 11 n c 0 \ - I I I �I f I L� L J R;i ' —IJ 0 co ��I 0 t#� : " III 1 III 1 1-1 I I F ° 0 0 ,a&I, I I I ( 11I 1 / .I 0 Litill f �! I 1 I 1 I M ° L_ fJ �r >Aj { I 41 1 II " I ill ....._ -,ua° \ r% `K1ro I I `` r I I 1 11 I I ,' . >ft >'t 4. 4i® ® . 111, e on M O O R P A R K A V E N U E Inr J z • • • 0 m 0 a f o It Q* o o .-i• :J J 4 \ 4 ( I v, J▪ ', J ® 4 •''' J —\�\ y T ' ® ..---<-- = , • 4 - ..4 J 0 J J . , a. CD .." \ '‘ \ ,1 D J 1 -I i 1 '1 \\ J ► -. 111 J J 1 J, a I J' s 1 1 _ i 1-) :J J j �( J J J t/ J °) ,I 0 0i , 4 , , 4 , / , J _/ J J J ,I ,I H ✓ J J J V JI � L ,EA lig ' 0 J J 7. i \ 4 I' 4/4 / \ ,e, ,, ,..) Ili. - 1 fi 4 Ir I. 1. I40°' ' _.,:s/1 s -)// 1' J J J J -- OM a © \ - l K r_ \ 1 \ ` 1 a \'\\ \ ', \ 1 n _:,, ._.F, \ I g i I I � z D p p. O °r° 41 N O I O \I N I y o D O-1 m n -.III b o J j�Q I CD T 7 I `• 'i Z 3 o °I io ° 3 I® � 0 D O • 1 'i _ o Lo d 0,.... I - of � > ! 0 Vit ! a ev, 41. SD 0 I +. > �I Cr I ° 0' op 2J „J AR,WYi' Et m ;o o > O I I : 1 S • o ► % N 0 :l mi, Atop, >' ►< f< 0 0 -1_ --) ® \ :::: ,. ( \S.!, • — 4=2 •" m" — ' — ' — ' —EEO"— I 1 J •� l • ° ;���� I .l0 HMO Es s11 0 �. _ L. at it ii _ i „..._.......„ o_ °°°0000000° illek 11. 20000000000 -0 Oit et °°°°°°°°°°° °°°°°°°°°°°m At -I nn olik ° ■ d o � t �,�t _ Vii► 114,�0` \ at 111 0 2 IM4 ��J I. N 3 m > t >h� Olt s � <" +� !.g iio + O t o o\ �A D° I'Ilk 1 woo. 0 0 0 oge 1 _, . 1 )4040. )4016, )40440% % iv, m `Z I��G' itibi 3 at o IV ,S �S , A io io xto ere EnsgrzuggisrpnagastgairrAzwargee ° I IIIL© 4 _ te. ® MOORPARK AVENUE ® " A > = D MI r 0 m S y : .114414s: / z • • • 0 wo co se c4 74: > R $1, '.< -,7 § 0 ki ii cn m 4 m 4 T K g Ei. 0 (A g- * 0 , 00 •••i = ? CI • A) ...I Cn x- 1 • g OP • R. . \ -*_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - -_ \ \ J J ___+t 4 ■) 4 ' . .. ,li - .. - • • 7 ...., • _, _ CD r ,...0 4 = J 1-'1 1 .-11- .J j CD I '"),-.0 -' I J J . , , .., , J ....) 4 1 CD 1) ,..4 E -0 -) ' ..) I .,,.. \‘ ‘..,,,rkie.,./ ----- ,„...• ...0 ‘,..„„ -- - .) p) I 4, , -, ..." . x i I m " • • ' • ''' .. el I ..., 1 , ' .."'„' W .., \ t ., (''' , '' 'I o = ,, \\ ' 1 --,.-41 J'I 0 ,, _ 3 -:,, \ • de. f. 'I a) \ ' -1 .., co ., , 2 -1 \ J , ,r1 ...■ , 1 J I L J \\ \ J i 1 '• _f_ 1 \\ 1H • ) 'I ,cl 4 \\ J I r , I ; = 6 J , . J _ 1 . — ...) i [i 4 .) I . D ,1 _ , ;J ...;J— J—1—-1—-.)--41 - "— 0 :, 1 1 j :1---.. ..I—.. P 41 r "-- g ) I ,1 ..)--.1-41-----r--r— .4 I I I , I 111• i :I IL j_ L::=_-=- 1_ _ _ -_--___ i •...,- .,---.....,...- ../...n r • 1r Id ir, r' II ' • , ' / -"‘ % / I .I], •_-.., r) 4 ,r) '•-- V WNW q -..1/4 n Tr-iri—1 ..t. . -' i• . ....//\./.) .., I / ' ' ..cl ..) ..cl .cl . • - = )- ■- )-.../-..)-_.)--t-) ' ___---------- al= LIM tall D - = / --- --, .'-\ \; u ti. 1 \ \\ \ -•--\ \ -I I /- 0 i — o _y I® o.. ∎� :o w 7C� �Z VJ ' 8 O - I • ot I _ d (� u o v`• O O o V. C D l° °I o 0 CD -o rn B oo . o D o 1 410 Ho * 0 d lam- 'W` lee •H• M� ooz• Q J >40 A 404. Er 0 0 x o • At 11\t CD o >k M pm 3 0 0 y ^' m o vwi rrr 0 0 0 W • O 0 \ I t 0 • o s'•1t i�, 0 a l� ,�,.,. .,,,fit �M U ::::: - I_\\\ ♦ . It U ® ............ m . 1_ . — . gi I t o / ���� � �Ie r ,, . ,. ,. . 0 . . 0 14 aa Ort 0 / 8- $ o 2 o 5 ill 1 r N 3 I N ilo N S � 5 0 w ��. I . f► > 1 SII► No � ' -.il -5,:: tim W., 11. Ail.4.06... n 1 ii 01' iik -. 0 0 + 1 I•0 I r*. '.- : ._ ---' — > / I Ile I({ i \ a3 / >W a> >1 40*' " ' IVVJ VJL'J m LtL, i 2! G 1 m o I ... ..,.. . .. :, ...... ....,,.... ,.. ,. ,.. ....... ......,..., ,..., .,....„.,.. ...., . .. . .. .,, , . , , ..•....,,,,., . , ,, , •• ... .. .., . . .....<,.:..,,,....i, ,,.,, .. , „..,.....g.1, - . . . . . I ,rt . ., .... ... \ v`j"r a a 'mss a a a "-0-4 ■ A.NAI ® Call lli r ® MOORPARK AVENUE ® N II O >a x >®a D if _ r m 2 w N y 1 , i Z■ • • • n I D di m a) m a d O x 7 m 1 p o - n �� ■ = J r'' , 7r- ..... .., i„ , , 7 cpi. (h)1 ,,--,,, '-n 1 * , •, q 3 `\` v •1 . i , \‘‘,\-', ' 'i ''. 2 -1 ...,. - I i. \ , '1 'I. 1 \ . ., \\. 1 , ,,,1 \ , ,11 --- .-- I 1 1 i IJ t -' IJ -. 1 / IJ - - -.— I t.! 1 :1 in la�� � Flo ri �� _ L L -____; _._. , Ll -_- _ - -- - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - + rl+1' IF-I ∎— l s J 1 JJ j k a �I cwt' ' % % J•J .p f • 1 J `_ "* t am creo :1311 (11311 KM } y \'\\ \, n 1 ATTACHMENT 2 o °9y CITY OF MOORPARK ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM AOAq TED ,J�j � DATE: November 20, 2009 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council COPY.• Steve Kueny, City Manager FROM: Hugh Riley, Assistant City M na SUBJECT: Moorpark City Hall and Library LEED Certification- Basis of Design In July 2007 the City Council directed that the Civic Center (City Hall and Library) achieve LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Certification.The LEED Rating System was developed by the U.S. Green Building Council(USGBC). The USGBC was formed in 1993 to accelerate the adoption of green building practices, technologies, policies and standards. The USGBC developed LEED to help stimulate green building market transformation. USGBC membership consists of more than 400 organizations including product manufacturers, environmental non profit organizations, building and design professionals, building owners, and local and state governments. LEED.,is a third party certification system designed for rating new and existing commercial, institutional, and high-rise residential buildings.The use of LEED helps to establish minimum performance levels, create a common design and construction practices framework, and allows building owners to measure sustainable building performance relative to other buildings using LEED. Common levels of certification are silver, gold and platinum. Staff believes that a goal to achieve silver or gold certification is appropriate with the caveat that, during the design process we may find that achieving a higher level would not incur much additional work or money, we may decide to do this. According to the architect, for this project silver would be easy, as almost everything they are designing today is going silver and we are not seeing any additional cost. They believe Gold would be an appropriate target since costs for such items as green roof materials, solar panels, and skylight products have come down substantially. At the present time the consultant does not see anything that is cost prohibitive from a construction point of view. Staff believes that, under current circumstances,the cost to achieve Gold LEED Certification would increase the cost of the building by approximately 5%depending on systems and materials selected. Honorable Mayor and City Council City Manager November 20, 2009 Page 2 Detailed constructability estimates will assist the City in identifying the actual cost for these features before the project is put out for construction bids. Bid alternates for some features may also be utilized as extra cost control measure. As part of the concept design development process for Moorpark's new Civic Center, a LEED Design Charrette was held on July 31, 2009. City Staff,GKK Works and representatives from a number of project design consultants participated in the four hour meeting. The meeting's objectives were to 1) Initiate an integrated sustainable design process; 2) Develop sustainable design goals and strategies; and 3) Identify target LEED credits. Attached are the minutes from the Charrette and the DRAFT Report. Attachments: Draft Report - LEED Certification- Basis of Design Minutes—LEED Charrette gkkworks. Moorpark City Hall Meeting Minutes — No. 2 — LEED Charrette Date: Friday,July 31,2009 Location: Moorpark City Hall,Development Services Conference Room Attendees: Hugh Riley, Asst.City Manager Barry Hogan,Deputy City Manager David Bobart,Planning Director David Moe,Redevelopment Manager Steve Wagner,gkkworks,Project Manager Scott Brady,gkkworks,Project Designer David Martin,PSOMAS,Civil Engineer Jeremy Laurentowski,Professional Design Inc.,Landscape Architect Caecilia Gotama,Gotama Building Engineers,MEP Engineer Robert Randall,Saiful/Bouquet, Structural Engineer Jim Weiner,Collaborative Project Consulting,LEED Consultant Rosemary Lieberman,SCE,Savings by Design Technical Specialist Discussion: The following sustainable design goals were targeted: 1. The civic center as an urban design anchor for High Street revitalization 2. Long term sustainable benefits for a facility that will be used for over 100 years 3. Readily evidence sustainable features and an education display to represent the city government as a sustainable design leader 4. More than the minimum LEED credits to represent a sustainable design-focused strategy; possible Gold rating Major sustainable design features that were suggested: Creek Bed—To traverse the site from north to south in conjunction with a pedestrian trail. The creek bed may be integrated into the courtyard—see example at Balboa Park. The creek bed and any other courtyard water features may be designed to function dry or wet depending upon the season. The creek bed may also function as a percolation trench for site drainage since 95% indirect runoff is required. Solar Panels—Photovoltaic panels to provide on-site renewal energy. Panels may be provided as canopies for employee parking or as part of the courtyard canopy. Green Roof—May be provided in conjunction with the roof deck. Wind Ventilation—Passive or active,mechanically-assisted ventilation may be provided using the courtyard and breezeways. Other sustainable issues that were discussed: 1. Use stormwater as source for irrigation 2. Tap into the existing stormwater channel 3. Use low flow plumbing fixtures with sensors 4. Reduce or eliminate the use of hot water at restroom lavatories and in the kitchen 5. Use native,drought tolerant landscaping 6. Use pervious pavement provided that maintenance and durability issues are addressed 7. Develop strategy for getting daylight to the interior of building with clerestories, skylights,and/or borrowed lights 8. Develop strategy to minimize use of artificial lighting during the day 9. Survey existing task light illumination and sufficiency for work activities 10. Analyze advantages/disadvantages of energy modeling library renovation separate from new building A LEED/Sustainable Design Preliminary Report will be created based on the issues discussed in the charrette and additional information and recommendations provided by the design team. Meeting minutes by Steve Wagner. Please provide corrections or additions within five days of receipt. RECEIVED SEP 2 � 2009 CITY OF MOORPARK OFFICE OF THE CITY M AN GER Moorpark City Hall and Library LEED® Certification Basis of Design Draft — 9/21/09 g k kvvc, - _.. 155 S. Fair Oaks Ave. Pasadena, California 91105 (626) 666-6906 Moorpark City Hall and Library LEED Certification —Basis of Design Draft—9/21/09 Table of Contents 1. Contributors 2. Introduction 3. Target Credits 4. Sustainable Sites (SS) 5. Water Efficiency (WE) 6. Energy & Atmosphere (EA) 7. Materials & Resources (MR) 8. Indoor Environmental Quality (EQ) 9. Innovation & Design Process (ID) 10. Regional Priority Credits (RP) Page 2 of 21 Moorpark City Hall and Library LEED Certification — Basis of Design Draft—9/21/09 1. Contributors Architect/LEED® Accredited Professional gkkworks Contact: Stephen B. Wagner, AIA, LEED AP Civil En ig neer PSOMAS Contact: David Martin, PE Landscape Architect Professional Design, Inc. Contact: Jeremy Laurentowski, RLA Mechanical/Plumbing/Electrical Engineer Gotama Building Engineers Contact: Caecilia Gotama, PE, LEED AP Structural Engineer Saiful/Bouquet Engineers Contact: Robert Randall, SE Sustainable Design Consultant Collaborative Project Consulting Contact: James Weiner, AIA, LEED Faculty Page 3 of 21 Moorpark City Hall and Library LEED Certification—Basis of Design Draft—9/21/09 2. Introduction On July 31, 2009 gkkworks conducted a LEED Charrette with the Moorpark City Hall and Library design team, city staff, and a representative from Southern California Edison's Savings by Design program. The design team received direction regarding the city's priorities and potential target credits were reviewed. The Moorpark City Hall and Library will be submitted as a single building for LEED accreditation. Each member of the design team will be responsible for providing the documentation for the design credits in their discipline. The construction manager will be responsible for documenting construction credits. The City will be responsible for several of the credits that address operational rather than design strategies. gkkworks will oversee the design team members, review construction documentation, and be project administrator. The consensus of the design team and city staff was to target a LEED Gold Rating which requires a minimum of 60 credits out of a possible 110, plus a margin of several contingency credits. 3. Target Credits The following charts identify our classification of LEED-NC v3 credits as Yes, Maybe, and No. We have identified 56 Yes credits, and will target 8 of the Maybe credits to achieve a Gold Rating with a margin of 4 credits. Page 4 of 21 Moorpark City Hall and Library LEED Certification—Basis of Design Draft—9/21/09 Figure 3.1 —Target Credits: Sustainable Sites(SS) LEED-NC v3 Project Checklist May Credit Descri tion Credits Yes be No Comments Prereq 1 Construction Activity Req'd Pollution Prevention Credit 1 Site Selection 1 1 Credit 2 Development Density 5 5 &Community Connectivity Credit 3 Brownfield 1 1 Redevelopment Credit 4.1 Alternative 6 6 Transportation, Public Transportation Access Credit 4.2 Alternative 1 1 Transportation, Bicycle Storage& Changing Rooms Credit 4.3 Alternative 3 3 Transportation, Low- Emitting& Fuel- Eff icient Vehicles Credit 4.4 Alternative 2 2 Transportation, Parking Capacity Credit 5.1 Site Development, 1 1 Protect or Restore Habitat Credit 5.2 Site Development, 1 1 Maximize Open Space Credit 6.1 Stormwater Design, 1 1 Required by Ventura Countywide Storm Quantity Control Water Quality Urban Impact Mitigation Plan SQUIMP Credit 6.2 Stormwater Design, 1 1 Required by Ventura Countywide Quality Control SQUIMP Credit 7.1 Heat Island Effect, 1 1 Non-Root Credit 7.2 Heat Island Effect, 1 1 Roof Credit 8 Light Pollution 1 1 Most criteria are already required by Reduction Title 24 Subtotal: 26 17 5 4 Page 5 of 21 Moorpark City Hall and Library LEED Certification—Basis of Design Draft—9/21/09 Figure 3.2—Target Credits: Water Efficiency (WE) LEED-NC Q Project Checklist May Credit Descrii2ti on Credits Yes be No Comments Water Efficiency Prereq 1 Water Use Reduction Req'd —20% Reduction Credit 1 Water Efficient 4 2 2 Yes—50% reduction;Maybe—no Landscaping potable water usage Credit 2 Innovative 2 2 Wastewater Technologies Credit 3 Water Use Reduction 4 2 2 30% Reduction Subtotal: 10 6 2 2 Page 6 of 21 Moorpark City Hall and Library LEED Certification—Basis of Design Draft—9/21/09 Figure 3.3—Target Credits: Energy & Atmosphere (EA) LEED-NC v3 Project Checklist May Credit Description Credits Yes be No Comments Energy . . Prereq 1 Fundamental Req'd Commissioning of i the Building Energy Systems Prereq 2 Minimum Energy Req'd Performance Prereq 3 Fundamental Req'd Refrigerant management Credit 1 Optimize Energy 19 2 3 14 Separate calcs will need to be Performance performed for the library renovation i 1 —12% component 2-14% 3-16% 4-18% 5-20% 6-22% One additional credit for each 2% increase up to 48% Credit 2 On-Site Renewable 7 3 4 Energy 1 —1% 2-3% 3-5% One additional credit for each 2% increase up to 13% Credit 3 Enhanced 2 2 Commissioning Credit 4 Enhanced 2 2 Refrigerant i Management Credit 5 Measurement& 3 3 Verification Credit 6 Green Power 2 2 I i Subtotal: 35 9 12 14 Page 7 of 21 Moorpark City Hall and Library LEED Certification—Basis of Design Draft—9/21/09 Figure 3.4—Target Credits: Materials & Resources (MR) LEED-NC v3 Project Checklist May Credit Description Credits Yes be No Comments Materials & Resources Prereq 1 Storage&Collection Req'd of Recyclables Credit 1 Building Reuse, 3 3 We will reuse the existing library and Maintain 75%of the historic bricks, but the quantity will Existing Walls, Floors not be enough to achieve these credits & Roof 1 -55% 2-75% 3-95% Credit 1.2 Building Reuse, 1 1 Maintain 50%of Interior Non-Structural Elements Credit 2 Construction Waste 2 2 Management, Divert 50%from Disposal j 1 —50°0 2-75% Credit 3 Materials Reuse 2 2 1 -5% 2-10% Credit 4 Recycled Content, 2 2 (post-consumer+ '/2 pre-consumer) 1 -10% 2-20% Credit 52 Regional Materials 2 2 1 - 10% 2-20% Credit 6 Rapidly Renewable 1 1 Materials Credit 7 Certified Wood 1 1 I Subtotal: 14 6 2 6 Page 8 of 21 Moorpark City Hall and Library LEED Certification—Basis of Design Draft—9/21/09 Figure 3.5—Target Credits: Indoor Environmental Quality (EQ) LEED-NC v3 Project Checklist i May Credit Descri tion CreditsYes be No Comments Indoor Prereq 1 Minimum IAO Req'd Performance Prereq 2 Environmental Req'd Tobacco Smoke Control Credit 1 Outdoor Air Delivery 1 1 Monitoring Credit 2 Increased Ventilation 1 1 Credit 3.1 Construction IAO 1 1 Mgmt Plan, During Construction Credit 3.2 Construction IAO 1 1 Mgmt Plan, Before Occupancy Credit 4.1 Low-Emitting 1 1 Materials, Adhesives & Sealants Credit 4.2 Low-Emitting 1 1 Materials, Paints& Coatings Credit 4.3 Low-Emitting 1 1 Materials,Carpet Credit 4.4 Low-Emitting 1 1 Materials,Wood Credit 5 Indoor Chemical& 1 1 Pollutant Control Credit 6.1 Controllability of 1 1 Systems, Lighting Credit 6.2 Controllability of 1 1 Systems,Thermal Comfort Credit 7.1 Thermal Comfort, 1 1 Design Credit 7.2 Thermal Comfort, 1 1 Verification Credit 8.1 Daylight&Views, 1 1 Daylight 75%Spaces Credit 8.2 Daylight&Views, 1 1 Views for 90%Spaces Subtotal: 15 M12 3 0 Page 9 of 21 Moorpark City Hall and Library LEED Certification—Basis of Design Draft—9/21/09 Figure 3.6—Target Credits: Innovation & Design Process (ED) LEED-NC v3 Project Checklist May Credit Descri tion Credits Yes be No Comments AIM I Credit 1.1 Innovation in Design: 1 1 Educational Displays Credit 1.2 Innovation in Design: 1 1 Sustainable Janitorial Program Credit 1.3 Innovation in Design: 1 1 Unspecified Credit 1,4 Innovation in Design: 1 1 Unspecified Credit 1.5 Innovation In Design: 1 1 Unspecified Credit 2 LEED Accredited 1 1 Professional Subtotal: 6 2 1 3 Figure 3.7—Target Credits: Regional Priority Credits (RP) LEED-NC 0 Project Checklist May Credit Description Credits Yes be No Comments o Credit 1.1 Regional Priority 1 1 Credit: SS Credit 2; Development Density Credit 1.2 Regional Priority 1 1 Credit: SS Credit 4.1 Alt Transportation, Public Access Credit 1.3 Regional Priority 1 1 Credit: : WE Credit 1 Water Efficient Landscaping, 50% Credit 1.4 Regional Priority 1 1 Credit: WE Credit 3, 20% Reduction Subtotal: 4 4 0 0 Page 10 of 21 Moorpark City Hall and Library LEED Certification—Basis of Design Draft—9/21/09 Figure 3.8—Project Totals LEED-NC v3 Project Checklist May Credit Descri tion Yes be No Comments Project Totals�-, SS Sustainable Sites 17 5 4 WE Water Efficiency 6 2 2 EA Energy&Atmosphere 9 12 14 MR Materials&Resources 6 2 6 i EC Indoor Environmental Ouality 12 3 0 i ID Innovation& Design Process 2 1 3 RP Regional Priority Credits 4 0 0 Silver Certification: 50-59 Credits 56 25 29 Gold Certification: 60-70 Credits Page 11 of 21 Moorpark City Hall and Library LEED Certification—Basis of Design Draft—9/21/09 4. Sustainable Sites (SS) SS Credit 2—Development Density and Community Connectivity—Yes The civic center site is located within 1/2 mile of a 10-units/acre residential zone and within 1/2 mile of at least 10 basic community services with pedestrian access. Responsibility: Architect—gkkworks SS Credit 4.1 —Alternative Transportation, Public Transportation Access—Yes The civic center site is located within 1/z mile of the Metrolink station. Responsibility: Architect—gkkworks SS Credit 4.2—Alternative Transportation, Bicycle Storage&Changing Rooms—Yes Bicycle storage for 5% of building users, and changing rooms and showers for 0.5%of occupants will be provided. Separate men's and women's changing and showers are planned. Responsibility: Architect—gkkworks SS Credit 4.3—Alternative Transportation, Low Emitting and Fuel Efficient Vehicles — Maybe The city will investigate the use of low-emitting and fuel-efficient vehicles for 3% of occupants. Since library visitors will be included in the Full Time Equivalent occupant calculation, this will be difficult to achieve. The preferred parking and refueling station options are also available. Responsibility: City of Moorpark SS Credit 4.4—Alternative Transportation, Parking Capacity—Maybe Sharing parking with the post office, High Street businesses, and existing civic center community buildings may address this credit. Alternately, priority parking for carpools may be provided for 5% of the total new and redesigned parking in the civic center. Responsibility: Architect—gkkworks SS Credit 6.1 —Stormwater Design, Quantity Control— Yes The Ventura Countywide Storm Water Quality Urban Impact Mitigation Plan (SQUIMP) requires all new developments to control post-development peak storm water runoff discharge to a level that is less than or equivalent to pre-development runoff peak storm water runoff rates.This requirement exceeds the LEED requirements for sites with existing imperviousness exceeding 50%, which only calls for a 25% reduction in the peak discharge for 2-year recurrence period 24hr storm event. Page 12 of 21 Moorpark City Hall and Library LEED Certification —Basis of Design Draft—9/21/09 To prevent post-development runoff peak flow from exceeding pre-development as well as reducing the 2-year 24-hr storm discharge by 25%, onsite detention storage facilities will be provided. These on-site detention storage facilities would typically be provided under pavement areas, either as nested pipes or crushed rock, or in surface swales in landscape areas. Impervious pavement areas will also be minimized and pervious pavement added to encourage water infiltration into the ground thus reducing the storm water discharge from the site under lower recurrence period rainfall events (for example: the 2-yr 24—hr storm event.) Responsibility: Civil Engineer—PSOMAS SS Credit 6.2—Stormwater Design, Quality Control—Yes The Ventura Countywide Storm Water Quality Urban Impact Mitigation Plan(SQUIMP) requires all new developments to control the quality of storm water discharge by the use of appropriate method to remove all pollutants of concern and needs to treat the volume produced by a 0.75"storm event. This requirement meets the LEED requirement of treating 90%of the average annual rainfall as this equates to 0.75" for semi-arid areas by definition. The storm water quality will be achieved by the use of appropriate best management practices (BMP) and typically by encouraging infiltration as the primary means of treatment. Subject to geotechnical evaluation the first 0.75"of rain fall will be directed into a dry well for percolation into the ground but other means of infiltration such as pervious pavement and drainage swales in landscape areas will be used. Where catch basins are required, catch basins filter inserts will be provided which are highly effective in trapping hydro-carbon pollutants from vehicles in parking lots. Responsibility: Civil Engineer—PSOMAS SS Credit 7.2—Heat Island Effect, Roof—Yes All buildings will be designed with roofing materials that achieve the light reflectance property required for this credit. This requirement is now the industry-wide standard for roofing materials. Responsibility: Architect—gkkworks SS Credit 8—Light Pollution Reduction—Yes The project site is located in Lighting"Lone 2—Low(200-3000 people per square mile) and will be designed to comply with specific restrictions for this zone. Exterior lighting shall be no more than 0.10 horizontal and vertical foot-candies at the sight boundary and 0.01 foot-candles 10 feet beyond the site boundary. ASHRAE 90.1 2004 tables will be used in designing the exterior lighting to ensure building fagade and exterior areas are not overly lit. The requirement for Interior Lighting will be met by an automatic shut off for all lights in the building during non-occupied hours. Responsibility: MEP Engineer—Gotama Building Engineers Page 13 of 21 Moorpark City Hall and Library LEED Certification-Basis of Design Draft-9/21/09 5. Water Efficiency (WE) WE Credit 1 —Water Efficient Landscaping, Reduce by 50%—Yes;No Potable Use or No Irrigation—Maybe Native, drought-tolerant plant materials will be used in the planted areas. A temporary irrigation system will be removed once planting is established. Mulch used for the planting areas will be obtained from local companies using recycled materials and used in all soil amendments. Responsibility: Landscape Architect—Professional Design, Inc. WE Credit 2—Innovative Wastewater Technologies—Yes The plumbing system will be designed to use 50% less potable water through the use of highly efficient flush valves, lavatory faucets, and sinks. Dual flush valves or single flush valves shall be confirmed by the owner as well as the use of electronic or manual metered faucets. Responsibility: MEP Engineer—Gotama Building Engineers WE Credit 3, 20%Reduction—Yes By complying with credit 2, this credit can be achieved.Current baseline water usage for a flush valve is 1.6 GPF, 1.0 for a urinal and 2.2 GPM for a lavatory faucet. Responsibility: MEP Engineer—Gotama Building Engineers Page 14 of 21 Moorpark City Hall and Library LEED Certification—Basis of Design Draft—9/21/09 6. Energy & Atmosphere (EA) EA Credit 1 —Optimize Energy Performance—2 Credits Yes/2 Credits Maybe An efficient lighting and mechanical design will be modeled in Energy Pro to illustrate the associated energy savings. This combined model will include LED lighting, lighting controls, air handling equipment,envelope construction, water heating equipment and on site energy production with photovoltaic solar panels. Separate calculations will need to be performed for the renovated library mechanical system. Achieving a reduction of 20 % will be attempted. During the modeling of the building, coordination with the owner and the architect to weight cost benefits will be vital. Responsibility: MEP Engineer—Gotama Building Engineers EA Credit 2—On-site Renewable Energy—3 Credits Yes If the systems modeled in EA Credit I can significantly lower the building operating costs, designing on site renewable energy will be feasible. On site renewable energy credits are calculated as a function of the buildings yearly operating cost. In California it makes the most sense and is cheapest to install solar panels to create energy on site. 3 points can be achieved if 5% of the facility's energy is supplied from solar arrays. Responsibility: MEP Engineer—Gotama Building Engineers EA Credit 3—Enhanced Commissioning—Yes Considering the complexity of the city hall and library engineered systems, it is valuable to have a commissioning agent. Enhanced commissioning includes a third-party review of the design documents and how they well they meet the owner's requirements. The commissioning agent is also responsible for reviewing submittals during construction. Development of the systems manual, requirements for training, and a thorough review of the systems would be led by the commissioning agent. The Owner's Project Requirements will be developed by the owner and the Basis of Design will be developed by the design team. These documents are integral to a successful commissioning process. Responsibility: City of Moorpark or Construction Manager EA Credit 4—Enhanced Refrigerant Management—Yes Mechanical and fire suppression systems shall have a level of refrigeration that complies with the formulas developed by the USGBC. Responsibility: MEP Engineer—Gotama Building Engineers Page 15 of 21 Moorpark City Hall and Library LEED Certification—Basis of Design Draft—9/21/09 EA Credit 5—Measurement& Verification—Maybe Various gas, electric and BTU meters will be installed to measure the actual energy being used by the installed system.The results from the measurement process, which lasts a minimum of one year,are then compared to the energy model that was developed for EA Credit 1, Optimize Energy Performance. If the results show that the building is operating less efficiently than designed, then an action plan to correct the errors will be implemented. Responsibility: MEP Engineer—Gotama Building Engineers EA Credit 6—Green Power—Maybe The City of Moorpark may enter a contract with the power company for 2 years to ensure that 35%of the electricity supplied to the building is from renewable sources. Renewable electricity costs have been going down for the past 2 years. Designing a building that is below ASHRAE 90.1 will help keep this cost down. Responsibility: City of Moorpark Page 16 of 21 Moorpark City Hall and Library LEED Certification—Basis of Design Draft—9/21/09 7. Materials & Resources (MR) MR Credit 2.1 —Construction Waste Management, Divert 75% from Disposal—Yes This practice requires little additional cost, but requires diligent documentation on the part of the Construction Manager. The specifications will include a form to simplify the documentation. Responsibility—Specifications by Architect—gkkworks; Documentation by Construction Manager MR Credit 4—Recycled Content, 20%—Yes Recycled materials are commonly available and will be specified wherever practical. The use of steel, which is recycled,over wood as the structural system will be studied to determine the impact related to durability, cost, and achieving this credit. The specifications will include a form to simplify construction documentation. Responsibility—Specifications by Architect—gkkworks, Documentation by Construction Manager MR Credit 5—Regional Materials, 20%—Yes Materials and products will be specified so as to facilitate sources within 500 miles of Moorpark. These credits are generally achievable in California. The specifications will include a form to simplify construction documentation. Responsibility—Specifications by Architect—gkkworks; Documentation by Construction Manager MR Credit 6—Rapidly Renewable Materials—Maybe We will use rapidly renewable products wherever applicable, such as bamboo flooring, cotton batt insulation, wool carpeting, etc, to achieve 2.5% of total value if possible. Responsibility: Architect—gkkworks MR Credit 7—Certified Wood—Maybe We will review the wood products that are specified and designate certified wood if possible. We will confirm that certified wood specifications don't conflict with achieving EQ Credit 4.4 for Low-Emitting Wood Products. Responsibility: Architect—gkkworks Page 17 of 21 Moorpark City Hall and Library LEED Certification—Basis of Design Draft—9/21/09 8. Indoor Environmental Quality (EQ) EO Credit 1 —Outdoor Air Delivery Monitoring=Yes Outdoor air is vital to any conditioned space. Ventilation helps to keep occupants awake, alert, and healthy. Research has documented that people prefer environments with ample fresh air. In order to meet the ever changing fresh air needs of spaces such as conference rooms, work rooms, and library study rooms,demand control ventilation is suggested. This is achieved through a simple control system. A CO2 sensor will be located in high density areas. When the CO2 concentration rises above a certain level a signal will be sent to the air handling equipment to bring more outside air into the space to satify the new fresh air needs of the room. Some systems also include a monitoring system that keeps the outdoor air flowing to the system at the minimum ASHRAE 62 volume. Responsibility: MEP Engineer—Gotama Building Engineers EO Credit 2—Increased Ventilation—Yes The mechanical system will be designed to deliver 30% more outside air than the ASHRAE 62 minimum. ASHRAE 62 prescribes minimum outside air CFM based on the occupancy and usage of each zone. Responsibility: MEP Engineer—Gotama Building Engineers EO Credit 3.1 —Construction IAO Management Plan, During Construction—Yes Protection of construction materials, dust control, etc. are easily achievable"BMP—Best Management Practices"for construction. Credit for these activities will require diligent photo documentation on the part of the Construction Manager. Responsibility: Specifications by Architect—gkkworks; Documentation by Construction Manager EQ Credit 3.2—Construction IAO Management Plan, Before Occupancy Yes Flushing of mechanical and plumbing systems, etc. are construction activities that may require additional construction time. However, the time impact will be minimal if properly scheduled. These practices do have positive health results for the occupants. Responsibility: Specifications by MEP Engineer—Gotama Building Engineers; Documentation by Construction Manager Page 18 of 21 Moorpark City Hall and Library LEED Certification—Basis of Design Draft—9/21/09 EO Credit 4.1 —Low-Emitting Materials, Adhesives and Sealants—Yes EO Credit 4.2—Low-Emitting Materials, Paintings &Coatings—Yes Low-emitting, VOC compliant adhesives, sealants, paints, and coatings are already required by the regional air quality management district (AQMD). Responsibility: Architect—gkkworks EQ Credit 4.3—Low-Emitting Materials—Yes Low-emitting carpet systems are industry standard and not a cost issue. Responsibility: Architect—gkkworks EO Credit 4.4—Low-Emitting Materials, Composite Wood& Agrifiber Products—Maybe Low-emitting plastic laminate or wood fiber casework is common, but this credit must be coordinated with MR Credit 7—Certified Wood, and both are not always achievable in the same product. Responsibility: Architect—gkkworks EO Credit 5 —Indoor Chemical & Pollutant Source Control—Yes Entry mats and grates, special room exhaust if necessary, and MERV 13 air filtering will be provided at a nominal cost. Responsibility: Architect—gkkworks and MEP Engineer—Gotama Building Engineers EO Credit 6.1 —Controllability of Systems, Lighting—Yes The building will incorporate a range of lighting control methods. Occupancy sensors will be used in bathrooms, conference rooms, and rooms that are 250 square feet and smaller. The building will incorporate a global time clock to shut off non-essential lighting during off hours. A/B switching will be used in the main library and stacks areas. Dimming and multi-scene controls will be used depending on occupancy and business hours to limit the power utilization for meeting rooms. Responsibility: MEP Engineer—Gotama Building Engineers EO Credit 6.2—Controllability of Systems. Thermal Comfort—Yes Controls for the majority of the occupants will be provided so that individual needs can be easily met. There are many ways to achieve this; VAV boxes, natural ventilation and Thermafusers are just a few. There may be an opportunity to use a Variable Refrigerant Flow system as well. This type of system is extremely efficient and versatile as well as creating many zones, enhancing the controllability of the system. Responsibility: MEP Engineer—Gotama Building Engineers Page 19 of 21 Moorpark City Hall and Library LEED Certification—Basis of Design Draft—9/21/09 EO Credit 7.1 —Thermal Comfort,Design- Yes The design day dry bulb temperature in Moorpark is 98 degrees. Using this information and the average humidity levels in Moorpark, a mechanical system will be designed to human comfort standards as outlined in ASHRAE 55. Psychometrics will be used to balance the outside air temperature and moisture content with the design conditions in the building. During the summer the inside design temperature will be between 72 and 75 degrees at 50%humidity and during the winter months a temperature of 70 will be maintained. The main library and stack areas will be designed to achieve 4-6 air changes per hour. Responsibility: MEP Engineer—Gotama Building Engineers EO Credit 7.2—Thermal Comfort, Verification—Maw This credit is designed to ensure the satisfactions of the building occupants and verify the system is working as it was designed. One year to 18 months after the building is occupied a survey shall be conducted asking the employees about their satisfaction. There will also need to be a plan in place to adjust the system if there are complaints or problems. Responsibility: City of Moorpark and MEP Engineer—Gotama Building Engineers EO Credit 8.1 —Daylight& Views, Daylight—Yes It is most common for this credit to be obtained for office-type functions using Option 1 — Glazing Factor Calculation to obtain a minimum level of daylighting in 75%of occupied areas. We will design the building taking into account solar orientation, floor plan layouts, exterior glazing, and potential clerestories and skylights. Light shelves also enhance daylighting. Open office areas and interior glazing for borrowed light will be investigated. We will also work with SCE Savings by Design to model and optimize daylighting levels. Responsibility: Architect—gkkworks EO Credit 8.2—Davlight& Views, Views—Maybe This credit may be obtained if there are sufficient views to the exterior in 90% of the occupied areas. The relatively narrow building width will aid in achieving this credit. However, interior glazing for private offices will likely be required. The interior glazing can also furnish borrowed light to achieve EQ Credit 8.1 for daylighting. Responsibility: Architect—gkkworks Page 20 of 21 r Moorpark City Hall and Library LEED Certification—Basis of Design Draft—9/21/09 9. Innovation & Design Process (ID) ID Credit 1.1 —Innovation in Design: Educational Display—Yes An educational display will be provided in the courtyard or the lobby to highlight the sustainable design features that are incorporated into the new facility. Responsibility: Architect—gkkworks ID Credit 1.2—Innovation in Design: Sustainable Janitorial Program—Maybe The city may implement a janitorial cleaning and maintenance program that uses sustainable products, materials, and methods. Responsibility: City of Moorpark ID Credit 2—LEED®Accredited Professional—Yes Steve Wagner of gkkworks will be the LEED°Accredited Professional. Responsibility: Architect—gkkworks 10. Regional Priority Credits (RP) Additional bonus credits are provided for sustainable design strategies that are geographically- specific environmental priorities as established by USGBC chapters and regional councils. RP Credit 1.1 —Regional Priority: SS Credit 2,Development Density and Community Connectivity—Yes RP Credit 1.2—Regional Priority: SS Credit 4.1 —Alternative Transportation, Public Transportation Access—Yes RP Credit 1.3—Regional Priority: WE Credit 1 —Water Efficient Landscaping, Reduce by 50% —Yes RP Credit 1.4—Regional Priority: WE Credit 3, 20% Reduction—Yes Page 21 of 21