HomeMy WebLinkAboutRES PC 2016 609 2016 0524 RESOLUTION NO. PC-2016-609
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
NO. 2015-01 AND ZONE CHANGE NO. 2015-02, A REQUEST TO
CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION
FROM FREEWAY/RIGHT OF WAY TO LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (I-1)
AND THE ZONING DESIGNATION FROM RE-1AC (RURAL
EXCLUSIVE, 1 ACRE MINIMUM LOT SIZE) TO INDUSTRIAL
PARK (M-1) TO CREATE LAND USE DESIGNATION
CONSISTENCY FOR SPECIFIC PARCELS LOCATED ON A 36-
ACRE SITE ON THE WEST SIDE OF PRINCETON AVENUE,
SOUTH OF STATE HIGHWAY 118, ON THE APPLICATION OF
SUNBELT ENTERPRISES, LLC, AND FINDING OF EXEMPTION
FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER CEQA IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH
WHEREAS, on September 29, 2015, an application for General Plan
Amendment 2015-01 and Zone Change 2015-02 was filed by Sunbelt Enterprises LLC
for a request to change the General Plan Land Use Designation from Freeway/Right of
Way to Light Industrial (I-1) and the Zoning Designation from RE-1 ac (Rural Exclusive,
1 acre minimum lot size) to Industrial Park (M-1) to create land use designation
consistency for specific parcels; Subject to a Deed Restriction Requiring a Specific Plan
and Development Agreement for property located on a 36 acre site on the west side of
Princeton Avenue, South of Highway 118.; and
WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on May 24, 2016, the Planning
Commission considered General Plan Amendment 2015-01 and Zone Change 2015-02;
and
WHEREAS, at its meeting of May 24, 2016the Planning Commission considered
the agenda report and any supplements thereto and written public comments; opened
the public hearing and took and considered public testimony both for and against the
proposal; and reached a decision on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has Determined that this
project is Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Section
(15301) as a Class (1) exemption for Existing Facilities in that the General Plan
Amendment involves small properties already in use and the Zone Change would not
change the use of the property on Princeton Avenue and would provide consistency
with the General Plan land use designation.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Resolution No. PC-2016-609
Page 2
SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The Planning
Commission concurs with the Community Development Director's determination that
this project is Categorically Exempt from the provisions of CEQA pursuant to Section
(15301) as a Class (1) exemption for Existing Facilities in that the General Plan
Amendment involves small properties already in use and the Zone Change would not
change the use of the property on Princeton Avenue and would provide consistency
with the General Plan land use designation.
SECTION 2. ZONING CONSISTENCY FINDING: Based upon the
information set forth in the staff report(s), accompanying studies, and oral and written
public testimony, the Planning Commission finds the zoning as proposed under Zone
Change 2015-02 to be consistent with the General Plan.
SECTION 3. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning
Commission recommends to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No.
2015-01 and Zone Change No. 2015-02, subject to a Deed Restriction Requiring a
Specific Plan and Development Agreement for the undeveloped hilltop property and
contribution of an initial deposit of $20,000.00 toward the preparation of the Specific
Plan prior to recordation of a lot line adjustment on this property.
SECTION 4. Filing of Resolution: The Community Development Director shall
cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original resolutions.
The action of the foregoing direction was approved by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Aquino, Groff, Hamous, Vice Chair Landis, and
Chair Di Cecco
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
PASSED, AND ADOPTED this 24th day of May, 201
J ("fpfie/
Mark Di e cg'', Chair
. „:7"Ae
David Bobardt, Community Development Director
Attachments:
Exhibit A— General Plan Amendment Map
Exhibit B — Zone Change Map
0
-orQ
vy0P.
•�
d� b
N cc' "1-.p5 R
t\ T •tao -8 o,
U v,
b iii
Q" J¢ root.-
U dc.b
CD
1,3 `13
���-I 00I0 ]n2 co
CO
; 3 0
, \ 1 ' '!)-' \
T ;
a m ,
L
Q 3 '
a '
iic
O co I I
N J ! i
i t 1 }
O=- O Z i !
F F_ \ i
\119-z\ i-—___•-•j
=z = z m I
�= w a 1 I
to W
Wj - _ I>•
in 0 ♦ N o f a•
u_ t= "I 0 0 _ o I
Z Cl) \R � 1 I
_ 0 \ Z z, .P i 1 1
0 \ a a i i
Z \ Q Q I\ i
d � %
QF
c,
W / /
Z 8
W
0
EXHIBIT A
0)
Ng "
cOV®R Z
�F�h h
l:�,q b
cw o'm I
N N g+0 S N
n 4• • a
�� ' q
J t1d,�
0 ��b
W
�EUN
rb1O �
N
; O .
T
I
T
X ZCC
1 z
W p: a } i
W Q Q
fIS 1- i
Ztr. ~
1
i
1i- Z ;
U o Q 1
z Zt
O W 0
¢ U. r �1
N o a"
Z o r Y 1 EIL. I
_a 1 ., a I
J ;w
In LL) Z¢
LU!!`i O OWD i([
T CV z t b 1Of
{ Iri
Oi O �- 1 Iidi
l 0 1 O ,zI
¢ _ i_I
ch °- 'J 0_
LI-
0 W •
TC; In 0 co
/ 's
\ a d U z.� �II 1�
Q Q \ ^ �� I1
N. /
Ni #.-7:::"..s,,°H./ .
o
y
f i
j
EXHIBIT B