Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 1997 0402 CC REG ITEM 09EITEM 1. E. MY o c. AGENDA REPORT C TTY O F MOORPARK of Cl Coa - 199 TO: The Honorable City Council. AC ,?N: .t FROM: Kenneth C. Gilbert, Director of Public p?rks DATE: March 21, 1997 (Council Meeting 4 -2 -97) SUBJECT: Consider Request from Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation (CEDC) for 1) City Funding of a Portion of the Campesina Park Construction Costs; and, 2) City Acceptance of Said Park for Ownership and Maintenance Upon Completion Construction This presents a request from Cabrillo Economic Development Corporation [CEDC] (see letter attached as Exhibit 1) for City funding of a portion of the construction costs for Campesina Park. CEDC is also requesting that, upon completion of the construction of the park, that the park be granted to and be maintained by the City. BACKGROUND 1. By Resolution 86 -297 the City Council approved Tract 4147 for the development of the Villa Campesina neighborhood. The Conditions of Approval for that tract required the developer, CEDC, to construct a park on a lot at the south end of the tract (Parcel 'A'). That lot is encumbered by an easement for flood control purposes, granted to the Ventura County Flood Control District [VCFCD] (see Exhibit 2). 2. In late 1995 and early 1996 City and County officials met with CEDC and area residents to discuss VCFCD plans for the construction improvements to the Arroyo Simi. Those plans called for the widening of the channel into the area proposed for the park (Parcel 'A') .. As a result of those meetings, revisions were made to the channel improvement plans which moved the channel widening upstream to accommodate a park site on the westerly portion of Parcel 'A'. That action reduced the park from approximately 2.0 acres to approximately 1.5 acres. 3. In March of 1996 the City Council approved the revised conceptual design for the park based on the amended channel widening plans. As a part of that action or a prior action of the City Council,, it was determined that the City would assist, to a degree, in the development of the plans for this project by not requiring CEDC to pay the City for any staff time expended on the review of the project: design or the administration of the camp2 `t �ow!bbi Campesina Park April 2, 1997 Page 2 project development, nor would CEDC pay any administrative overhead charges for any outside costs incurred by the City, which are normally paid by the applicant. 4. The VCFCD has prepared a legal description for that portion of Parcel 'A' to be developed as a park site. Presuming that this park is to be maintained by the City, the plan would be to have CEDC convey all of Parcel 'A' to the City. The City would then convey that portion east of the park to VCFCD coincidentally with the VCFCD relinquishing its easement over the entire Parcel 'A' (see Exhibit 31.. 5. CEDC has had plans and specifications prepared for both the landscape improvements and the "hardscape" improvements. A diagram showing the final design for the park is attached as Exhibit 4. 6. On December 4, 1996, the City Council considered the subject request from CEDC and referred the matter to the Public Works, Facilities and Solid Waste Committee. 7. The Public Works, Facilities and Solid Waste Committee discussed the subject request at their meetings on December 16, 1996, January 22, 1997 and February 18, 1997. Although the Committee discussed various elements of the subject request in its draft form, the Committee did not receive or review the final request (dated March 19,1997) and has not offered a recommendation on this matter. A. Conditions of Approval As stated earlier, the Conditions of Approval for this Tract placed the responsibility for the construction of this park with the developer, CEDC. Certain of those conditions are summarized and commented upon as follows: Tract 4147 Conditions Comments 1. Rio. 15: This condition states that the park site shall be developed by the residents as a private park facility to be owned by CEDC. No Quimby park in lieu fees were paid by CEDC. Campz If the City approves City participation in the costs of the construction of this project, the City would be rescinding or amending those conditions requiring the property owners, or the property owners via CEDC, to construct these improvements. 0000Gs Campesina Park April 2, 1997 Page 3 2. Mos. 19 & RPD -1049 Cond. No. 26: These conditions states that an easement for the park site shall be offered to the City, but presumably not accepted unless the need arises. The condition states that, in the event proper maintenance is not provided by the residents, said maintenance shall be taken over by the City and a special assessment shall be levied upon all of the properties within the Tract to fund the cost of said City maintenance. B. Summary of Subiect Request There have been a number of discussions which imply that it is the intent of both CEDC and the City to have the park conveyed to the City and maintained by Assessment District 85 -1 (a Citywide assessment). This action would be contrary to the conditions requiring the owners of the sixty -two lots within Tract 4147 to pay for the maintenance of this park. The subject request is summarized as follows: Request _ City Funding of Imcrovement Costs: CEDC is requesting the City to fund the difference between the monies they have available to construct the park and their estimated cost to complete that construction. Their estimate of City costs is $61,935 (`.)999 lot . 2. City Park Maintenance: CEDC is requesting that the City consider funding the maintenance of this proposed future City Park from the Citywide park maintenance district (AD85 -1.).. Comments _ It should be noted that the amount of City funds requested by CEDC in prior meetings and correspondence was $40,000 ($645 / lot). In addition, as discussed in Section E2 of this report, the City's estimate of the cost of the improvements proposed to be constructed by the city is in excess of $93,000 ($1,500 / lot). As discussed in Section A and Section D of this report, there is a case for requiring park maintenance costs to be funded by local residents. This can be done by establishing a 'one of Benefit assessment for the lots within Tact 414', 3. Zone of Benefit: CEDC understands that it may See Section D for a discussion of park be necessary for the City to establish a Zone maintenance. of Benefit (AD84 -2) to fund the maintenance of this park via an assessment upon all of the lots within Tract 414 4. Release of "Earmarked" Monies: CEDC is requesting that the City release approximately $43,571 of CEDC monies restricted to the development of the subject park. cnmpz 00007C Campesina Park April 2, 1997 Page 4 Pbaw I Construction: CEDC is proposing to proceed immediately with the construction of Phase I improvements consisting of grading, fencing and the construction of the basketball court. It is the intent of CEDC to manage the contracts for this work. It is assumed that these contracts would not be subject to the Public Contracts Code. 6. CDBG Fmnditw: CEDC's letter mentions that they have submitted a separate request to the City that all or a portion of the remaining park construction costs be funded by Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. 7. Phase II Construction: CEDC has requested that the remainder of the park improvements be constructed by the City. Such contracts would be subject to the Public Contracts Code. A summary of those remaining improvements is as follows: a. irrigation system b. soil amendments c. planting (shrubs trees) d. hydroseeding (turf) e. sidewalks and other remaining concrete work f. Tot Lot play equipment g. specialty items + benches, tables, BBQ, etc.) h. electrical / lighting i. domestic water service 8. Well Water: The park improvement cost estimates discussed herein are based on the assumption that irrigation water will be provided from the wells at Arroyo Vista Community Park. CEDC has stated that the construction of the basketball court in the first phase of construction is in response to priorities stated by the residents. Unfortunately the expense of this element of work requires almost all of the monies CEDC has available. It should be noted that the construction of irrigation and landscaping after the basketball court and basketball uses have been established, will be a problem. As discussed in Section G, CDBG monies can not be used for this purpose. A construction contract administered by the City will have to comply to the requirements of the Public Contracts Code, which adds costs not normally associated with contracts awarded by private agencies. As you might recall, the construction contract for the Arroyo Vista Community Park Bicycle j Equestrian / Pedestrian / Emergency Access Bridge includes the extension of a well water line to the north side of the Arroyo. camP2 U000 ( J Campesina Park April 2, 1997 Page 5 9. Donated Services and Materials: One of the goals of this project is to utilized donated materials and labor to the fullest extent possible. The costs estimates provided by CEDC do not include possible receipt of certain donated concrete and plant materials. If received, actual costs by CEDC will be Less than those indicated. 10 Plan ,B': The letter from CEDC mentions that if City funding cannot be obtained, that it would be the intent of CEDC to proceed with a revised project which would call for only the construction of only the grading, fencing, irrigation and planting at this time. The basketball court, playground equipment, picnic tables, barbecues, lighting, concrete flatwork and other planned improvements would be deferred. C. Project Plans and Specifications As discussed in Section H of this report, little information has been provided on how donated services and materials are to be solicited and utilized. See Section H of this report for a discussion of this alternative plan of action. 1. As stated above, CEDC has prepared final plans and specifications for the park. A sketch illustrating that design is attached as Exhibit 4 City staff has reviewed and approved these plans. 2. CEDC has expended considerable effort to develop a set of plans and specifications for the construction of a neighborhood park of Villa Campesina. These plans provide for the construction of park amenities which meet and exceed the wishes of the community. 3. The plans and specifications also meet the standards and requirements of the City for the development of a City park, with an eye toward minimizing future maintenance costs. Unless the park were constructed to such a plan, it would be the recommendation of staff that the park improvements NOT be accepted by or maintained by the City. 4. The other obvious purpose for the development of these plans is to provide a "blueprint" for the phased implementation of the various park improvements and facilities shown on the plans. 5. In the opinion of staff, CEDC is to be commended for complying with the wishes of staff in meeting these objectives. Campesina Park April 2, 1997 Page 6 D. Park Maintenance Costs 1. Additional Parks: During the public hearings last June related to setting the assessment amounts for FY 1996/97, the City Council stated concerns regarding the growing costs for parks maintenance. The City Council stated that, in order to keep these costs under control, that there would be no new parks added to the City's park system. 2. Proposition 218: It appears that the passage of Proposition 218 may limit or even preclude City City's ability to use the 111972 Landscaping and Lighting Act" to levy assessments to fund maintenance costs for parks maintenance costs. Assessments based upon a "special benefit" appear to be more compatible with the provisions of Proposition 218 than assessments based upon a "general benefit." 3. New Zone of Benefit: The Engineer's Report setting forth the assessments for FY 1997/98 for AD84 -2 will allow the City Council to consider the establishment of a new Zone of Benefit to fund maintenance costs for this future park. That Zone will consist of all of the lots within Tract 4147. The use of this mechanism to fund City costs for future maintenance of this park was at, one or more meetings of the Public Works and Facilities Committee meeting, at which were present representatives (,af CEDC and residents of the neighborhood.. E. Project Costs 1. CEDC Estimate: Attached to the letter from CEDC (Exhibit 1) is an estimate of probable costs prepared by CEDC. Those costs are reformatted on the chart prepared by staff attached as page 5 of that Exhibit. Those cost figures are summarized as follows: campz OQW73 Work by Work by Element _ __.___ - - - - -- CEDC _ City Total Construction 233r> 58,684 82,037 Construction Contingency (10 %; 0 0 Design 17,,40, 0 17,469 Contract Main & Inspection _ 4,000 2,000 6,000 Total 44,8,': 60,684 105,506 campz OQW73 Campesina Park April 2, 1997 Page 7 2. City Estimate: Staff has had the project design reviewed by a landscape architect retained by the City. At the request of staff the City's consultant prepared a second construction cost estimate. That construction cost estimate, along with a summary prepared by staff showing certain additional non - construction costs, is attached as Exhibit 5 and summarized as follows: Construction Phase I (Constructed by CEDC) Work by Work by 2,792 Element CEDC city Total Construction 23,76 "9,194 102,962 Construction Contingency (10 %) ;,3" ',919 10,296 Design 17 40, a 17,469 Contract Admin & Inspection 4,00 6,000 10,000 Total 47 6 93,113 140,727 3. Cosnarison: A comparison of the two estimates is as follows: Total CEDC's City's Amount of Element Estimate Estimate (Sl Increase ($) Construction Phase I (Constructed by CEDC) 23,35:, 26,145 2,792 Phase II (Constructed by City) 58,684 _ 87,113 28,429 82,07' 113,258 31,221 Design : .PO4 1-7,469 0 Contract Admin & Inspection Phase I 4,000 4,000 0 Phase II 2,000 6,000 4,000 6,000 10,000 4,000 Total 105,5ot, 140,727 35,221 F. Costs Reduction As stated above, it is the intent of CEDC to utilize donated materials and labor to the fullest extent possible. Although this may be easily done when administered by CEDC, it is difficult to implement and administer volunteer and donated materials and work within the context of a public contract. 0000 74 csmp2 Campesina Park April 2, 1997 Page 8 G. Discussion of City Funding Sources 1. Park Ianrove mt Fund: It would be inappropriate to use Park Improvement funds for this project. As stated above, CEDC paid no Quimby park in -lieu fees when this project was approved. In addition, the project site is not within any park improvement zone. There are no monies available in this fund for this project. 2. CDBG Funds: As previously discussed with the City Council, CDBG funds must be "targeted" to benefit certain approved beneficiaries. A park which would be held for general use does not meet this test.,. Therefore, CDBG funds cannot be used for this project. 3. General Fund: One possible source of funds is he General Fund. 4. I'arovesent,Assessment: Another option would be to have the City advance the park improvement funds to be repaid by an improvement assessment levied over several years. For example an additional $100 per lot per year improvement assessment added to the AD84 -2 Zone 13 assessment would generate $6,200 per year. The estimated City cost of $93,000+ would be repaid in fifteen years. MRFSTMIKEWT-4 -. One of the stated objectives of the implementation of this park project is the fostering, development and utilization of volunteer help and donated material. The proposal offered by CEDC does little to implement this goal. Instead CEDC is asking that the City step in and fund all or nearly all of the funding shortfall. An alternative approach would be for CEDC to use the monies they have available to construct an initial phase of construction consisting of grading, security, irrigation and landscaping. That effort could include the use of donated and volunteer labor and materials to the fullest extent possible, in order to minimize costs. Subsequent to the construction of those "basic" park improvement, CEDC could reassess the amount of funds remaining and then determine if they are in a position to proceed with additional phases of work to construct some of the other park amenities shown on the plans. CEDC could then make further attempts to drawn upon volunteer labor from the neighborhood and donated materials from the business community to construct one or more of those future phases of work. When all of these efforts have been exhausted, the matter of City funding of a portion of the park improvements could then be reconsidered.. cdIDp2 000075 Campesina Park April 2, 1997 Page 9 I. Conclusions 1. priorities: It is the view of staff that the development of the "greenscape" should proceed the construction of the basketball court and other park amenities. There are a number of problems associated with attempting to construct these improvements after the basketball facilities and uses have been established. Also, moving the basketball court to a later phase provides a greater incentive for seeking and obtaining donated labor and materials. 2. Donated Efforts: CEDC is requesting that a considerable portion of their obligation to provide a neighborhood park for Tract 4147 be assumed by the City. This request is being made before adequate efforts have been expended to maximize the use of volunteer labor and donated materials to build the park. In the view of staff, the request is premature. Every effort should be made to explore the limits of volunteer and donated resources before the City is asked to fund this project. Staff recommends that the City Council deny the request and request that CEDC proceed with the construction of the park improvements in a manner consistent with the program outlined in Section H of this report. camp2 OO V 163 5) is 1ap�e Crn 11011 Azahar Street, Saticoy, California 93004 (805) 659.3791 Fax (805) 659 -3195 BOARD OF DIRECTORS KENNETH R. MERIDETH President March 19, 1997 Soares, Sandall, Bemacchi & Petrovich DAVID J. SABEDRA Vice President Channel Islands National Bank Kenneth C. Gilbert RICHARD FRANCIS Vice President Director of Public Works Attorney 799 Moorpark Avenue OSCAR C.GONZALEZ Moorpark, CA 93021 Treasurer England, Whitfield, Schroeder &Tredway Re: Villa Campesina Park BARBARA A. JOURNET Secretary Community Representative Oxnard Dear Mr. Gilbert JOHN J. VACCA AssistantSSecretary The CEDC requests that the City a q Y rove pp participation in Corporate Broker Attorney the cost of the Villa Campesina park and upon completion RENECORADO accept ownership and maintenance of the park. The City epreaentative Community sguez Casa Velelaaq funding required is up to approximately $61,935 based on � Camarillo the current park design. MARY KAISER Caftmla Community Reinvestment Corporation Our preference is that the maintenance for the park be ERNIE MORALES funded under the citywide park maintenance district. Community Representative Fillmore However, we understand that it is currently City policy JESSICA MURRAY not to add new facilities, and if necessary, maintenance Community Representative could be covered under a zone of benefit. We understand Montgomery Oaks Community Homes, Inc., Ojai that the City is proceeding with steps necessary to SISTER CARMEN RODRIGUEZ implement such a zone. St. John's Community Outreach Oxnard Specifically, p y, we propose that: MARLA Community DAre Community Representative 1) The City approve releasing the funds in the escrow Apricot Ranch account for this project, $43,571.34 as of January 23, Simi Valley 1997; FATHER St. Joh sMSemiary SH 2) The CEDC will move immediately to complete the following work (see attached budget, first phase): ADVISOR BOAR • staking and grading RONL.HERTEL • fence installation Hertel Constructors • basketball court (flatwork) BARBARA ORTIZ Channel Counties unties • basketball hoops Legal Services Association 3) The City will provide funding to cover park costs RICHARD McNISH over the $43,571.34 plus in escrow (the CEDC has submitted Strathmore Homes an application for CDBG funds for equipment and this is ALZAPANTA one potential funding source) ; Atlantic 4) When water hookups are available, the following will be completed: irrigation system and water hookups, balance EXECMVE- of flatwork, hydroseeding, and planting. For the RODNEYE FERNANDEZ hydroseeding, we will obtain a 90 day maintenance warranty and provide temporary fencing. Some of the work, such as lighting, could be completed later, after the City accepts the park, as funds are available. A community economic devabomeM serving the muntiw• gr v.gn i ... e Zx �7-45� Kenneth Gilbert March 19, 1997 Page 2 Attached is the CEDC budget, for a total cost of approximately $105,506. The construction budget is based on actual bids for most work. This budget does not provide for turf. It also does not include a potential donation worth about $3,300 for half the cost of the concrete or the donation of plant material. We also looked at a scenario that would require minimal or no additional funding from the city. The basketball court, other concrete, playground equipment, picnic tables, barbecues, and lighting would be eliminated. Please contact Mike Carroll or me if you have any questions. Sincerely, ea4z- Karen Flock Project Manager cc: Mike Carroll, CEDC Construction Manager Melissa Harris, Villa Campesina Via FAX 529 -8270 (5 pages) Villa Campesina Park Budget Alternative A Date: 3/19/97 Date Total Phase l Phase 2 PredeveloRwvjt Costs Paid Or To Be Paid (see attached) Calleguas MWD fees 10/31/91 3,543.56 3,543.56 City plan check fees /deposit 6/15/94 180.00 180.00 Landscape architect 6/20/94 3,225.00 3,225.00 Weed abatement 6/20/94 140.00 140.00 Civil engineering 10/25/94 2,245.03 2,245.03 Civil engineering 12/20/96 1,183.38 1,183.38 City plan check fees 1/16/97 277.00 277.00 Landscape architect 1/27/97 3,065.56 3,065.56 Weed abatement 3/14/97 163.81 163.81 City plan check fees 1,132.50 1,132.50 Civil engineering 2,032.00 2,032.00 City inspection fees 281.00 281.00 17,468.84 17,468.84 Construction General Requirements 101 Temp. Facilities/Utilities 103 Protection/Guard Service 104 General Labor Subtotal Site Work 202 Rough grading/excavation 205 Irrigation 206 Landscaping & plantings 207 Fences - chain link 208 Field Engineering 209 Water & Sewer Subtotal 302 Pole Bases 307 Flatwork Subtotal 1 111 2,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 500.00 500.00 1,000.00 500.00 500.00 3,500.00 2,000.00 1,500.00 5,123.00 5,123.00 8,588.00 8,588.00 12,589.00 1.2,589.00 3,397.00 3,397.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 36,697.00 10,520.00 26,177.00 1,250.00 18,155.00 19,405.00 1 of 2 1,250.00 9,826.50 8,328.50 9,826.50 9,578.50 iAl14 ' 1 Electrical 1006 Site Lighting /3 poles 5,600.00 5,600.00 Subtotal 5,600.00 0.00 5,600.00 S2ccialties 1401 4 barbeques 600.00 600.00 1402 4 picnic tables 1,800.00 1,800.00 Subtotal 2,400.00 0.00 2,400.00 Eguipment 1503 Playground equipment 14,679.27 14,679.27 Subtotal 14,679.27 0.00 14,679.27 Special Construction 1601 2 Basketball posts 1,756.00 1,756.00 Subtotal 1,756.00 1,756.00 0.00 Indirects 1702 Supervision 4,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 Subtotal 4,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 Total 105,506.11 43,571.34 61,934.77 Total, Construction only 88,037.27 26,102.50 61,934.77 Sources Escrow as of 1/97 43,571.34 43,571.34 Requested from City 61,934.77 0.00 61,934.77 Total 105,506.11 43,571.34 61,934.77 2of2 Campesina Park Construction Cost Estimate -- CEDC 1111. Phase 1 Phase 2 Description CEDC City - - - - Total ------- - - - - -- --------------------------------- - - - - -- Construction ------- - - - - -- ------- -- --------------------------------------- 101 Temp Facilities 1,000 1,000 2,000 103 Protection /Guard Service 500 500 104 General Labor 500 - 500 - - - - -- 1,000 ------- - - - - -- Sub -total 100 ------- - - - -- 2,000 ------- 1,500 3,500 202 Rough Grading 5,123 5,123 205 Irrigation 8,588 8,588 206 Landscaping 12,589 12,589 207 Fencing 3,397 3,397 208 See Construction Engineering 0 209 Water / Sewer 5,000 5,000 - - - - -- Sub -total 200 ------- - - - - -- 8,520 ------- - - - - -- 26,177 ------- 34,697 302 Pole Bases 1,250 0 1,250 307 Flatework 9,827 8,328 18,155 Sub -total 300 ------- - - - - -- 11,077 ------- - - - - -- 8,328 ------- - - - - -- 19,405 1006 Site Lighting 0 5,600 5,600 1401 4 barbegues 0 600 600 1402 4 picnic tables 0 1,800 1,800 1503 Playground equipment 0 14,679 14,679 1601 2 basketball poles 1,756 - - -- 0 ------- - - - - -- 1,756 ------- - - - - -- Sub- total other ------- - - 1,756 22,679 24,435 Sub -Total 23,353 58,684 82,037 Contingency 0 ------- - - - - -- 0 ------- - - - - -- 0 ------- - - - - -- Construction Sub -total ------------- 23,353 ------- - - - - -- 58,684 ------- - - - - -- 82,037 Construction Engineering --------------------------------------- 208 Field Engineering (inspection) 2,000 2,000 1702 Contract administration 2,000 2,000 4,000 4,000 2,000 6,000 Design 17,469 0 17,469 Grand Total ------- - - - - -- 44,822 ------- - - - - -- 60,684 ------- - - - - -- 105,506 1111. 001 . n O m L Q � m Co J I i t \A. I" ! 79E• R Sf bf fF Zf If OE 6Z BZ LZ• 'Stu.?. .° 9Z °e ,,.,, /�• ?t sia aln 11 01 © ® /VL 0 ® O Kl e► a fa!LS SI 9f Lf 81 OZ II ,11 Y ,� / ►1IIV low v� 3fa ,o► ll•R 01 6 8 L 9 S b f d /�• ?t sia aln 11 01 © ® /VL 0 ® O Kl a �Q 11U1�: CL G ar g y u co co 48bt 71 �► ,o► srD, N V N Y m U O F` t� I NSry148..V11mF,g� I " V _ " - — EXISTING BACK YARD FENCING +' - p - -- COURT STRIPING « C. 4 Is t" 0 �-- CONCRETE BASKETBALL COURT p + / « + , O REDWOOAREADER- TYPICAL « p BASKET BALL GOAL . — Y LAWN - + � 0 r LAW N — t O CL z + ¢W • ;� TC.ONCRETE SIDEWWALK �< / t LAWN i + t LAwN -_ P Y « _ + K • _ i \ - - - -� -- •LEVY ROAR \ • 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK -- / L_. CLIMBING STRUCTUR: AREA - CHIPPER MULCH ENDING POINT FOR 72' HIGH CONTINUOUS CHAIN LINK FENCE -- -- n' Campesina Park Construction Cost Estimate -- CITY --------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- Phase 1 Phase 2 Description CEDC City --------------------------------- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- Construction --------------------------------------- Grading 2,600 Playground 25,530 Basketball 14,418 Site Features 4,300 Walls /Fences 6,750 Hardscape Landscaping Irrigation Lighting Sub -Total Contingency Construction Sub -total construction Engineering --------------------------------------- 208 Field Engineering (inspection) 1702 Contract Administration Design Grand Total 6,882 18,663 17,819 6,000 Total 2,600 25,530 14,418 4,300 6,750 6,882 18,663 17,819 6,000 ------- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- ------------- ------- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- 23,768 79,194 102,962 2,377 7,919 10,296 26,145 87,113 113,258 2,000 3,000 * 5,000 2,000 3,000 * 5,000 4,000 6,000 10,000 17,469 0 17,469 ------- - - - - -- ------- ------------- ------- 47,614 - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- ------- 93,113 - - - - -- - - - - -- 140,727 Note: * Contract costs only. Does not reflect majority of constrict administration and inspection costs which are to be perform by City personnel. 111 is 03/14/1997 15:50 9093694030 OOnn�ni iN' _ �JORKS COMM VMFM DESM GROUP PRELNOMARY COST ESTMATE PAGE 02 Pagel DATE: 03114107 ESTIMATE BY: CHRIS GIANNINI PROJECT: CAMPESINA PARK - MOORPARK KNIT TOTAL DBSCIIN�TN�N QTY, UNIT COST COST DEMOLITION AND CLEARING CLEAR AND GRUB 35500 S.F. $0.05 $1,775 GRADING 660 C.Y. $1.25 $825 CONSTRUCTION PLAY SUM PLAY ECIUMMENT ALLOW $17,500.00 517,500 PLAY AREA CONC CURB 12'X30" 148 L.F. $22.50 $3,330 FISAR 1400 S.F. $3.00 $4.200 SUMP (6' DEEP X 4' DIA.) 1 EACH $500.00 $500 BASKETBALL HALF COURT BASKETBALL 4750 S.F. $2.50 $11,876 POLE, RM, ETC. 2 EACH $1.100.00 $2,200 SURFACE STRIPING 527 L.F. 50.65 3343 SITE FEATMES PICNIC TABLE 4 EACH $700.00 3+2,800 BAR -&Q GRILL - STANDARD 4 EACH $200.00 X00 BENCH 2 EACH $350.00 $700 WALLSIFENCES CHAINLINK FENCE 6' 500 L.F. $13.50 !6,750 HAROSCAPE CONCRETE PAVING - 4" 3441 S.F. $2.00 $8,012 LANDSCAPING SM PI PffINE GRADING 25'00 S.F. $0.18 $4,992 WEED ABATEMENT 25900 S.F. $0.03 $777 00 DAY MAINTENANCE PERIOD 25900 S.F. $0.06 $1,554 1 6 (IS GAL) 44 EACH s".00 $3,740 SHRUBS (5 GAL) 236 EACH $14.00 $3,304 OW0816 MAR 14 197 15:52 QA4 'RAQeaz4 perc a� 03/14/1997 15:50 909369402° 'WOWS PAGE 03 DATE: 03/14/97 ESTIMATE BY: CHRIS GIANNINI -P**r# PROJECT: CAMPESINA PARK - MOORPARK UNIT AL DESCRIPTION QTY. UNIT COST COST TURF HYDROSEED 13427 S.F. $0.05 3671 REDWOOD HEADER 360 L.F. $3.50 $1,260 WOOD MULCH 77 C.Y. $35.00 $2,605 IRRIGATION/ WATER/ SEWER AUTOMATIC IRRKATION SYSTEM LARGE AREAS 13427 S.F. $0.35 $4,699 SMALL AREAS 11120 S,F. $1.00 $11,120 CONTROLLER 1 EACH $2,000.00 $2,000 LIGHTING/ ELECTRICAL SECURITY WALKWAY/LIGHTS 3 EACH $2,000,00 $6,000 SUBTOTAL $102,662 10.00% CONTINGENCY $10,29!! GRAND TOTAL $113,259 CAMPIMNAL n i l ft - MAR 14 197 15:52 one awn�n�n