The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAGENDA REPORT 1985 0617 CC REG ITEM 07A 07B 07C 2 • . .I Af«fi r � fi iµ ze, ALBERT PRIETO STEVEN KUENY Mayor P0. 04 _ City Manager JAMES D. WEAK / I.,9z CHERYL J. KANE Mayor Pro Tem F�, v City Attorney THOMAS C. FERGUSON �. NIALL FRITZ Councilmember �. Director of `w Community DANNY A. WOOLARD ° Development Councilmember 09�,/ P Q"*ao ,v" ^ R. DENNIS DELZEIT LETA YANCY-SUTTON City Engineer Councilmember JOHN V. GILLESPIE DORIS D. BANKUS Chief of Police City Clerk MEMORANDUM JOHN C. GEDNEY i, ;2( 1/9 City Treasurer RECEIVED • TO: The Honorable City Council .IIS 9 1 2 1935 FROM: R. Dennis Delzeit , City Engineer leCity of 10orr. ', DATE : City Council Meeting of June 17 , 1985 SUBJECT : Proposed Parks Maintenance District (A.D. -85-1) and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District (A.D. -84-2) BACKGROUND INFORMATION At the June 3rd City Council meeting , the City Council opened the Public Hearing for the formation of the proposed Parks Maintenance Assessment District (A.D. -85-1) and the proposed Lighting Maintenance Assessment District (A.D. -84-2) . After hearing testimony, the City Council discussed the proposed districts and continued the matter to the June 17th City Council meeting . The City Council directed staff to make revisions to the Engineer' s Report and to provide additional information. A summary of the revisions follows : Parks Maintenance Assessment District The method and formula of cost spread recognizes that there is benefit to virtually every property within the City of Moorpark from the public parks . • The method of spread is based upon the "people use" attributed by each of the land uses within the City. This method was chosen because the benefit received from the parks is directly proportionate to the number of people generated by each of the land uses who enjoy the bene- fits that the parks provide . Recognizing that the residential land uses within the City derived a higher degree of benefit than the non-residential land uses , the formula was subdivided into these two main groups , with residential land uses contributing 75% of the assess- ment and non-residential uses being assessed for 25% of the maintenance cost . 799 Moorpark Avenue Moorpark, California 93021 (805)529-6864 Page -2- The benefits to the residential land uses in the City are somewhat obvious in that the residents of the City utilize the parks during their leisure hours . The benefits to the non-residential properties may not be as obvious but the benefits include such items as offering employees the opportunity to utilize the parks during lunch time and after hours situations , the aesthetic benefits adding to increased land values of non-residential lands , as well as providing an improved environment which adds to the attractiveness of the community and in a general sense , the attracting of potential employees into the area. At the June 3rd meeting , the City Council expressed a desire to re-evaluate the "people use" factors which were used in the park district formula. Staff has revised these formulas and they are shown in Appendix "A" on page A-1 of the Engineer' s Report . Attached is Exhibit "A"which is a summary of the assessments on each of the land use categories in the City. Column three shows that the proposed assessment for parks , for a single family residential parcel is $15 . 31 per year. This is consistent with the ballot measure approved by the voters . Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No . A.D. -84-2 The main change on the Lighting Maintenance Assessment District No. A.D. -84-2 was the change in the spread of the landscaping improvements to spread the cost of landscaping equally among all parcels within the City, in recognition of the general, indivisible public good that is provided by the landscaping within public right-of-way. The assessment for lighting is shown in a column which has been added to the Engineer' s Report as well as the annual cost for landscaping. In addition, the combined total for each land use within the City was added to the report in Table 3. The annual assessment for a single family home for landscaping and lighting under the proposed district is $36. 97 . This is shown in column two of the attached Exhibit "A". Page -3- RECOMMENDED ACTION If the two proposed assessment districts are to be formed, City Council action must be taken prior to July 1st of this year. After considering the testimony from the public and in consideration of the material presented in this report as well as the Engineer' s Reports , it would be appropriate for the City Council to consider formation of the two districts by adoption of the resolutions furnished by the City Manager at the June 3 , 1985 City Council meeting. RDD: lb3 Encl. cc : Niall Fritz , Director of Community Development John Knipe , Assistant City Engineer Earl Ledbetter , Design Engineer "ITY OF MOOPARK LIGHTING EMANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD-84-2 PARKS MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. AD-85-1 LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 ^� EXHIBIT "A" USE � ' �2� (3 ESTIMATED SUMMARY OF BOTH CODE DESCRIPTION PARCELS LIGHTING PARKS ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS 0 RESIDENTIAL VACANT 987.00 18.04 0.00 18.04 1 SINGLE FAMILY 3848.00 36.97 15.31 52.28 * 2 MOBILE HOME 298.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3 CONDOS 489.00 38.97 11.48 48.45 4 RESIDENTIAL INCOME 46.00 82.21 30.63 92.84 (2-4 UNITS) 5 APARTMENTS [5+) 4.00 30.67 11.49 42.15 [PER UNIT) 9 MOBILE HOME AND TRAILER 4.00 30.67 11.49 42.15 PARKS (PER SPACE) 10 COMMERCIAL VACANT LAND 26.00 18.04 0.00 18.04 11 RETAIL STORIES, SINGLE 26.00 112.69 115.39 228.08 STORY 12 STORE & OFFICE COMBINATION 5.00 112.69 115.39 228.08 15 SHOPPING CENTERS 1.00 175.78 384.61 560.39 (NEIGHBORHOOD) 18 SHOPPING CENTERS 1.00 175.78 1153.81 1329.59 [REGIONAL) 17 OFFICE BUILDING 3.00 87.45 115.39 202.84 [1 STORY) 18 OFFICE BUILDINGS 4.00 112.69 230.77 343.48 (MULTI-STORY) 19 RETAIL STORES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 (MULTI-STORY) 21 RESTAURANTS & COCKTAIL 1.00 137.92 115.39 253.31 LOUNGE 24 BANKS, SAVINGS & LOANS 2.00 87.45 115.39 202.84 25 SERVICE STATIONS 5.00 112.69 115.39 228.08 28 AUTO SALES, REPAIR, 1.00 112.69 38.48 151.15 STORAGE, RENTAL 30 INDUSTRIAL VACANT LAND B5.00 18.04 0.00 18.04 31 LIGHT MANUFACTURING 10.00 137.92 481.53 599.45 33 INDUSTRIAL CONDOS, 1.00 137.92 115.39 253.31 CO-OPS, PUD'S 38 MINERAL PROCESSING 2.00 87.45 115.39 202.84 44 TRUCK CROPS 4.00 36.97 76.93 113.90 48 PASTURE (PERMANENT) 8.00 38.97 76.93 113.90 48 POULTRY 1.00 36.97 76.93 113.90 49 FLOWERS, SEED PRODUCTION 2.00 36.97 78.93 113.90 51 ORCHARDS 3.00 38.97 76.93 113.90 53 FIELD CROPS, DRY 6.00 36.97 76.93 113.90 54 PASTURE OF GRAZE, DRY 112.00 38.97 78.93 113.90 55 FEED LOTS 2.00 38.97 78.92 113.89 57 TREE FARMS 4.00 36.97 78.92 113.89 61 THEATER 1.00 137.92 76.92 214.84 69 PARKS 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 70 INSTITUTIONAL VACANT LAND 3.00 18.04 0.00 18.04 71 CHURCHES, CONVENT, RECTORY 9.00 12.62 0.00 12.62 72 SCHOOLS 11.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 73 COLLEGES 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 79 FLOOD CONTROL 48.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BO MISCELLANEOUS VACANT LAND 7.00 18.04 0.00 18.04 81 UTILITY WATER COMPANY 9.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83 PETROLEUM & GAS 10.00 62.21 38.48 100.87 88 WATER RIGHTS, PUMPS 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 88 HIGHWAYS & STREETS 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 91 UTILITY EDISON 12.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 92 TELEPHONE 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 93 S.P.R.R. 24.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 94 UNDEDICATED COMMUNITY 140.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 AREAS (CONDO) 95 STATE PROPERTY 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 98 COUNTY PROPERTY 27.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 $ NOTE) 74 SINGLE FAMILY PARCELS WILL BE ASSESSED APPROXIMATELY $144 ADDITIONAL