HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2007 0718 CC REG ITEM 08A rrEM 9"a -
CITY OR MOORPARK,CALIFORNIA
City Council Mooting
le see.
•ACTS•--
MOORPARK CITY COUNCI , : _-----
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: Yugal K. Lail, City Engineer/Public Works Director
DATE: July 13, 2007 (CC Meeting of 07/18/07)
SUBJECT: Consider Southern California Edison's Objection to Recordation of
Final Map 5147 (AB Properties, Applicant)
DISCUSSION
Tentative Tract 5147 (AB Properties, Applicant), a 34.5 acre industrial subdivision
development project located approximately 1 ,300 feet west of Gabbert Road, north of
Union Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way, was approved by City Council on March 15, 2000.
It created 17 industrial lots, 1 lot for conservation easement, and 1 lot for landscaping
purposes. The final map was approved at the Council's March 21, 2007, regular
meeting. Following that meeting, recordation was delayed pertaining to finalizing a
required easement.
Under Public Comments at the City Council meeting of June 6, 2007, Southern
California Edison (SCE) voiced opposition to the recordation of the final map under the
Subdivision Map Act, Government Code Section 66436 (a)(3)(A)(ii). SCE has identified
that as a public utility owning a record title interest in the property, the property owner
was required to provide SCE with legal notice prior to scheduling the final map for
approval, which SCE has stated did not occur. Consistent with Government Code
Section 66436(a)(3)(A)(v), after receipt of SCE's objection, a public hearing was noticed
for July 18, 2007. On July 12, 2007, the City received a letter from SCE requesting that
any public hearing be scheduled on a date beyond the standard thirty-day period to
allow the parties (SCE and AB Properties) additional time to continue discussions. The
developer is requesting an expeditious decision, since loan financing is tied to final map
recordation, and grading has already begun. Following is an excerpt from the
applicable Government Code section that applies to scheduling and conducting the
public hearing:
(v) If the public entity or utility files an objection to the determination of the
legislative body or advisory agency that the division and development of the
property will not unreasonably interfere with the exercise of its right-of-way or
easement, the legislative body or advisory agency shall set the matter for public
S:Wdministrative Services\Everyone\1 Staff Reports\2007 Staff Reports\SR 07 0718 Tract 5147.doc 000001
Honorable City Council
July 18, 2007
Page 2
hearing to be held not less than 10 nor more than 30 days of receipt of the
objection. At the hearing, the public entity or public utility shall present evidence
in support of its position that the division and development of the property will
unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of the objector's right-
of-way or easement.
(vi) If the legislative body or advisory agency finds, following the hearing,
that the development and division will in fact unreasonably interfere with the free
and complete exercise of the objector's right-of-way or easement, it shall set forth
those conditions whereby the unreasonable interference will be eliminated and
upon compliance with those conditions by the subdivider, the final map may be
recorded with or without the signature of the objector. If the legislative body or
advisory agency finds that the development and division will in fact not
unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of the objector's right-
of-way or easement, the final map may be recorded without the signature of the
objector, notwithstanding the objections.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Open the public hearing and direct staff as deemed appropriate.
Attachment: Letter from Edison dated July 10, 2007
S:Wdministrative Services\Everyone\1 Staff Reports\2007 Staff Reports\SR 07 0718 Tract 5147.doc 000001--A
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Leon Bass Jr.
E D I S O N Senior Attorney
BASSL @sce.com
An EDISON INTERNATIONAL Company
July 10, 2007
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL
City of Moorpark
799 Moorpark Avenue
Moorpark, CA 93021
Re: California Government Code Section 66436 Request for
Hearing- Final Tract Map No. 5147
Dear Sirs and Madams:
On March 21, 2007, the City of Moorpark("Moorpark") City Council considered and
approved Final Tract Map No. 5147 ("TM 5147"). This letter serves as Southern California Edison
Company's ("SCE") objection to any recording of TM 5147 in its present version, pursuant to
California Government Code ("Govt. Code") § 66436(a)(3)(A)(ii).
SCE owns fee and easement properties adjacent to and/or within the subdivided real
property that is the subject of TM 5147. However, the Moorpark City Council approved TM 5147
without SCE's signature. In such a case, prior to recordation, Govt. Code § 66436(a)(3)(A)(i)
requires the subdivider(i.e., A-B Properties) to send SCE, as a public utility owning a record title
interest in the property, a sketch of the proposed final reap together with a copy of Govt. Code §
66436. SCE understands that real estate developer A-B Properties submitted TM 5147 to the city
clerk for recordation. SCE then notified A-B Properties of the requirements under Govt. Code §
664'Wa)(3)(A)(i). By letter dated June 8, 2007, A-B Properties provided SCE with a copy of TM
5147 and Govt. Code § 66436.
SCE is concerned that the development.of the property in the manner set forth in TM 5147
may unreasonably interfere with the exercise of its property rights. SCE and A-B Properties are
engaged in discussions to address the concerns and interests of both parties. However, to protect its
property interests and to preserve its right to a hearing under Govt. Code § 66436(a)(3)(A)(v), SCE
hereby submits its objection to TM 5147. Given that SCE received the copy of TM 5147 from A-B
Properties on June 11, 2007, this objection to the Moorpark City Council's determination and
request for a hearing is timely. Because SCE and A-B Properties are currently working toward a
P.O.Box 800 2244 Walnut Grove Ave. Rosemead,California 91770 (626)302-6967 Fax(626)302-3990 000001-6
City of Moorpark
Page 2
July 10.2007
resolution of this matter, SCE asks that any public hearing on TM 5147 be scheduled on a date
beyond the standard thirty-day period to allow the parties additional time to continue their
discussions. SCE hereby waives time to allow for such an extension.
Thank you for your consideration of this letter.
Very truly yours,
f,24
Leon Bass Jr.
cc: Walker A. Matthews,III
Linda Anabtawi
Paula Ames-Axt
Robert Gariss
Paul D. Burns
LAW-#1380932