HomeMy WebLinkAboutAGENDA REPORT 2007 1107 CC REG ITEM 10H rrEM
City Council Meeting
of
ACTION:
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL BY.
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Honorable City Council
FROM: John A. Brand, Senior Management Analyst
DATE: October 31, 2007 (CC Meeting of 11/07/2007)
SUBJECT: Consider Setting a Public Hearing to Consider A Resolution
Adopting Updated Fire Protection Facility Fee Schedule Paid by
New Development Projects and Rescinding Resolution No. 92-
894
BACKGROUND
The Fire Protection Facility Fee adjustment was introduced to the Ventura County Board of
Supervisors on October 16 and approved by the Board on October 23. Adopting a
matching fee schedule will ensure that the City's development fees are consistent with the
fees collected by Ventura County in the unincorporated areas, and will satisfy the
requirement to adopt the county's latest fee schedule.
The first step in adopting a revised fee is to set a public hearing and to notify interested
parties such as the Building Industry Association (BIA) of the proposed changes. The
attached draft staff report has been prepared in advance of the hearing in compliance with
Government code requirements for development project mitigation fee amendment
procedures.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Set the Public Hearing for December 5 and direct staff to make the appropriate
notifications.
Attachments
Attachment "A" Draft Fire Facility Fee Report
DRAFT
MOORPARK CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA REPORT
TO: The Honorable City Council
FROM: John Brand, Senior Management Analyst
DATE: October 16, 2007 (CC Meeting of December 5, 2007)
SUBJECT: Consider Resolution Adopting Updated Fire Protection Facility Fee
Schedule Paid by New Development Projects and Rescinding
Resolution No. 92-894
SUMMARY
If approved, this item would adjust the Fire Protection Facility Fee schedule paid by
developers for new construction. The proposed fees match those approved by the Board of
Supervisors on October 23, 2007 with an effective date of December 22 in its capacity as
the governing body of the Ventura County Fire Protection District. Consideration of this fee
adjustment is consistent with Moorpark Municipal Code §3.36 Building Permit Fees, and
applicable state law. Last updated by the County and the City in 1992, the proposed fees
represent increases of about 322% for residential projects and 362% for non-residential
construction.
BACKGROUND
On May 11, 1928, the Ventura County Fire Protection District (District) was established.
The District receives the majority of its revenues from property tax. As with most local
agencies, the District's property tax revenue stream has diminished in terms of real dollars
over time since the imposition of Proposition 13 in 1978. As a result, the District struggles
to keep pace with the increasing operational costs associated with providing services to its
existing and rapidly expanding service population. In July 1983, the county Board of
Supervisors first adopted Fire Protection Facilities Fees to accommodate new
development.
The Mitigation Fee Act contained in Government Code Section 66000 et seq. provides
that cities hold the legal authority to impose fees on behalf of the District within their City
limits. On October 19, 1983 the City Council adopted Resolution 83-47, establishing a Fire
Protection Facility Fee schedule. The City's fee schedule must match those of the District.
These fees were updated once in the past twenty-four (24) years, and that was on
Honorable City Council
Regular Meeting of December 5, 2007
Page 2
Draft
November 18, 1992 following an increase in the county fees at that time. For the past five+
years, staff has been encouraging the county to update its Fire Protection Facility Fees.
Staff anticipated that a number of new developments would overextend the District's
capabilities to provide service at the District's customary level of excellence, thus
increasing the demand for new facilities. Additionally, it was the opinion of staff that the
county's 1992 fee schedule had become significantly inadequate in light of inflation and
rapidly accelerating prices for land acquisition, construction, fixtures and equipment
necessary to build and supply a modern full service fire station.
DISCUSSION
The Fire Protection Facility Fee adjustment was introduced to the Ventura County Board of
Supervisors on October 16 and approved by the Board on October 23, 2007. Adopting a
matching fee schedule will ensure that the City's development fees are consistent with the
fees collected by Ventura County in the unincorporated areas, and will satisfy the
requirement to adopt the county's latest fee schedule.
The cities of Camarillo, Simi Valley and Thousand Oaks are expected to adopt similar
resolutions to that of the County and the one being proposed for Council consideration.
Over the years, millions of dollars have been generated through the facilities fees for the
construction of fire protection facilities in the service area.Although there is a single service
area, the monies historically have been spent in the particular communities from which they
were obtained.
Since last updated in 1992, the figures used in calculating the facilities fees have become
outdated. For example, over the past 15 years the size of a standard fire station has
increased from an approximate size of 5,700 square feet to 7,700 square feet because of
operational needs; and the costs for building a station have increased from less than $100
per square foot to approximately $500 per square foot, in large part due to increased
requirements in seismic and building codes, plus the overall escalation of construction
costs over the years.
Mitigation Fee Act Findings
To guide the imposition of development impact fees, the State Legislature adopted the
Mitigation Fee Act(the Act)with Assembly Bill 1600 in 1988 and subsequent amendments.
The Act is contained in California Government Code Section 66000 et seq. and establishes
requirements for the imposition and administration of impact fee programs. The Act
became law in January 1989 and requires local governments to document the five findings
explained in the sections below when adopting an impact fee. For the fire facilities impact
fee to be adopted by the City on behalf of the Ventura County Fire Protection District, it is
necessary to make certain findings. The findings are the result of study and analysis
S:\Assistant City Manager\Everyone\Staff Reports - City Council\John\Current Staff Reports\Fire
Facility Fees\Fire Protection Facilities Fees.doc
Honorable City Council
Regular Meeting of December 5, 2007
Page 3
Draft
performed by the Ventura County Fire Protection District in preparation of the proposed
updates to the Fire Protection facilities fees. Those findings are summarized here. All
statutory references are to the Act.
Purpose of Fee
For the first finding the City must identify the purpose of the fee. (§66001(a) (1)).The policy
of Moorpark and most cities and counties in California is that new development will not
burden existing development with the cost of public facilities required to accommodate
growth. The purpose of the Ventura County Fire Protection District fire facilities impact fee
is to provide a funding source from new development for fire protection capital
improvements to serve that new development. The fee advances a legitimate interest of
the County by assuring that new development within the County is provided with adequate
fire protection facilities and services.
Use of Fee Revenues
For the second finding the City must identify the use to which the fee is to be put. If the use
is financing public facilities, the facilities shall be identified. That identification may, but
need not, be made by reference to a capital improvement plan, may be made in applicable
general or specific plan requirements, or may be made in other public documents that
identify the public facilities for which the fee is charged. (§66001(a) (2)). The fire facilities
impact fee will fund expanded facilities to serve new development. All planned facilities will
be located within the Ventura County Fire Protection District boundaries:
• Land for fire station and other fire protection related structures;
• Fire stations including furniture and other equipment;
• Fire apparatus including equipped engines and other vehicles;
• Medical response, hazardous materials, training, and other specialized fire fighting
equipment.
• Potential financing costs associated with the above.
Planned fire facilities are preliminarily identified by the District. The District's Master Plan,
Capital Improvement Plan, or both provide additional details and proposed timing for
construction/acquisition of facilities.
Benefit Relationship
For the third finding the City must determine how there is a reasonable relationship
between the fee's use and the type of development project on which the fee is imposed.
(§66001(a) (3)). The District will restrict fee revenues to the acquisition of land, construction
of public buildings, and purchase of related equipment, furnishings, vehicles, and services
that serve new development. Fire facilities funded by the fee will provide the proportionate
share of fire protection facilities to accommodate new development. These facilities will
contribute to the district-wide network of services accessible to the additional residents and
S:\Assistant City Manager\Everyone\Staff Reports - City Council\John\Current Staff Reports\Fire
Facility Fees\Fire Protection Facilities Fees.doc
Honorable City Council
Regular Meeting of December 5, 2007
Page 4
Draft
workers associated with new development. Thus, there is a reasonable relationship
between the use of fee revenues and the residential and nonresidential types of new
development that will pay the fee.
Burden Relationship
For the fourth finding the City must determine how there is a reasonable relationship
between the need for the public facility and the type of development project on which the
fee is imposed. (§66001(a) (4)). Service population provides an indicator of the demand for
the facilities needed to accommodate growth. Service population is calculated based on
residents associated with residential development and employment associated with
nonresidential development. To calculate a single per capita standard, one worker is
weighted less than one resident based on an analysis of the relative demand for fire
facilities by land use type. The need for the fee is based on the facility standards identified
in this report and the growth in the District's service population through .2015. Facilities
standards are based on the District's planned facilities and growth for that area through
2015.
Proportionality
For the fifth finding the City must determine how there is a reasonable relationship between
the amount of the fee and the cost of the public facility or portion of the public facility
attributable to the development on which the fee is imposed. (§66001(b)). This reasonable
relationship between the fire facility impact fee for a specific development project and the
cost of the facilities attributable to that project is based on the estimated size of the service
population that the project will accommodate. The total fee for a specific project is based
on its size as measured by dwelling units or building square feet. The fee schedule
converts the estimated service population that a development project will accommodate
into a fee based on the size of the project. Larger projects of a certain land use type will
have a higher service population and pay a higher fee than smaller projects of the same
land use type. Thus, the fee schedule ensures a reasonable relationship between the
public facility fee for a specific development project and the cost of the facilities attributable
to that project.
As a result this review and the findings, the Board of Supervisors approved the new Fire
Protection Facilities Fees on October 23. The attached resolution makes the following
determinations, among other findings and determinations:
• Standard Fire Station size. The City hereby finds that, for the purposes of
Municipal Code Chapter 3.36, the standard amount of square feet of floor space
of a standard fire station is 7,700 square feet, increased from 5,700 square feet
to accommodate operational needs.
6('1'0
S:\Assistant City Manager\Everyone\Staff Reports - City Council\John\Current Staff Reports\Fire
Facility Fees\Fire Protection Facilities Fees.doc
Honorable City Council
Regular Meeting of December 5, 2007
Page 5
Draft
• Overextended Fire Stations. The Council hereby concurs with the Ventura
County Board of Supervisors' findings that the group of fire stations listed in
Exhibit A, attached hereto, has the service area described in Exhibit B, attached
hereto, and is overextended within the meaning of Municipal Code Chapter 3.36
because the estimated population of the service area is projected to be 471,246
people within the next eight years whereas the maximum number of people
which the group can adequately serve is 363,565.
• Fire Protection Facilities Fee. The values assigned to "A", "B", "C", "D", and "E" in
the formula set forth in Article 1 of Municipal Code Chapter 3.36 Fire Protection
facilities Fee are, or shall be computed as follows:
(a) The value "A" is the number $5,731,500. This number equals the
estimated costs in dollars of acquiring a standard fire station (as defined in the
Code or by resolution of the Council, whichever is greater), excluding land
acquisition costs but including site preparation and landscaping costs.
(b) The value "B" is the number 14,543. This number equals the maximum
number of people who can be served adequately by a standard fire station.
(c) For the purpose of computing the value "C", the estimated average
number of residents per dwelling unit is 3.27 for single family residences, 2.41 for
multi-family units and 1.96 for mobilehome units.
For the purpose of value "C," the residential categories are defined as follows:
(i) "Single-Family Residence" means a detached or attached unit
designed for occupancy by one family. This category includes both single-
family detached and single-family attached units For all single-family units,
the owner has entitlement to the land on which the unit sits, utility service
are independent for each unit either by open space orby a vertical wall
extending from ground to roof.
(ii) "Multi-Family Unit" means a building designed for occupancy by
two or more families. This category includes duplexes which fail to meet
the criteria for a single-family unit, condominiums for which ownership only
applies to the airspace occupied by the unit, and apartments in which
units are not individually owned and utility services are shared.
(iii) "Mobilehome" means a structure, transportable in one or more
sections, designed to be used as a dwelling unit. This category does not
0001.72
S:\Assistant City Manager\Everyone\Staff Reports - City Council\John\Current Staff Reports\Fire
Facility Fees\Fire Protection Facilities Fees.doc
Honorable City Council
Regular Meeting of December 5, 2007
Page 6
Draft
include recreation vehicles, commercial coaches, or factory-built (modular)
housing.
(d) The value "D" is the number 0.76. This number equals the estimated
portion, expressed as a decimal, of the standard fire station needed to provide
service to residential buildings and mobilehomes, as opposed to nonresidential
buildings.
(e) The value "E" is the number 2,815,912. This number equals the maximum
square footage of nonresidential building floor space which can be served
adequately by a standard fire station.
• New Fee Calculation. Applying the foregoing values to the subject formula
reveals that the fire protection facilities fee imposed by the Fee Ordinance shall
be $979.46 for each additional single family residence, $721.87 for each
additional multi-family unit, and $587.08 for each additional mobilehome unit and
shall be $0.49 for each additional square foot of floor space added by
nonresidential construction.
• Administration Fee. The City shall collect an administration fee of $15.00 for
costs it incurs for the administration of the Fire Protection Facilities Fee.
The table below shows the history of the Fire Protection Facility Fees as well as the
proposed fees:
Fire Protection Facility Fees
1983 1993 2008 Proposed Increases
Non-Dwelling $ 0.066 $ 0.11 $ 0.49 Per Square Foot
Multi-Dwelling 75.44 170.95 721.87 Per Dwelling Unit
Mobile Home 73.55 139.07 587.08 Per Dwelling Unit
Single-Family 120.70 232.51 979.46 Per Dwelling Unit
Administrative Fee 10.00 15.00 15.00 Per Transaction
Staff has contacted the regional representative from the Building Industry Association (BIA)
in reference to the proposed increase. The BIA was involved during the process conducted
by Ventura County and understands the need for the fee increase. The BIA is supportive of
t� 73
S:\Assistant City Manager\Everyone\Staff Reports - City Council\John\Current Staff Reports\Fire
Facility Fees\Fire Protection Facilities Fees.doc
Honorable City Council
Regular Meeting of December 5, 2007
Page 7
Draft
the City's position for adopting a fee that is consistent with the rate used in the
unincorporated areas of Ventura County.
There is no alternative action identified by staff. There is no anticipated fiscal impact to the
City as a result of this resolution. Currently there are minor administrative costs for
collecting and transmitting fire protection developer fees to the county. These costs should
not be affected by the fee increase.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
1. Open Public Hearing, accept testimony, if any, and then close the Public Hearing.
2. Adopt Resolution No. 2007- , approving Fire Protection Facility Fees and
rescinding resolution 92-894.
Attachment "1" Resolution
Exhibit "A" Fire Stations List
Exhibit "B" Service Area Description and Map
s'4
S:\Assistant City Manager\Everyone\Staff Reports - City Council\John\Current Staff Reports\Fire
Facility Fees\Fire Protection Facilities Fees.doc
DRAFT
RESOLUTION 2007-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
MOORPARK, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION 92-
894 AND ADOPTING REVISED FIRE PROTECTION FACILITY
FEES
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 156 (hereinafter the "Fee Ordinance") imposes a fee
on certain new construction for the purpose of providing funds to pay for additional fire
protection facilities needed to serve that new construction; and
WHEREAS, the Fee Ordinance provides that the fees may be used solely to pay
for such fire protection facilities; and
WHEREAS, the provisions of the Fee Ordinance, when coupled with certain
findings to be made from time to time by this Council respecting the fee, establish a
reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of the additional fire
protection facilities attributable to the new development upon which the fee is imposed;
and
WHEREAS, this Council has received and duly considered evidence necessary
to make such findings.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOORPARK
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Repeal of Previous Fee Resolution. Resolution 92-894 is
hereby repealed as of the effective date of this resolution. Notwithstanding such repeal,
the fees collected from the service area under resolution 92-894 but not used as of the
operative date of this resolution shall be used only for the purposes of acquiring or
improving fire stations serving said service area.
SECTION 2. Standard Fire Station. The City hereby finds that, for the
purposes of Municipal Code Chapter 3.36, the standard amount of square feet of floor
space of a standard fire station is 7,700 square feet.
SECTION 3. Overextended Fire Stations. The Council hereby concurs
with the Ventura County Board of Supervisors' findings that the group of fire stations
0001"I S
DRAFT
listed in Exhibit A, attached hereto, has the service area described in Exhibit B, attached
hereto, and is overextended within the meaning of Municipal Code Chapter 3.36
because the estimated population of the service area is projected to be 471,246 people
within the next eight years whereas the maximum number of people which the group
can adequately serve is 363,565.
SECTION 4. Fire Protection Facilities Fee. The values assigned to "A",
"B", "C", "D", and "E" in the formula set forth in Article 1 of Municipal Code Chapter 3.36
Fire Protection facilities Fee are, or shall be computed as follows:
(a) The value "A" is the number $5,731,500. This number equals the estimated costs
in dollars of acquiring a standard fire station (as defined in the Code or by resolution of
the Council, whichever is greater), excluding land acquisition costs but including site
preparation and landscaping costs.
(b) The value "B" is the number 14,543. This number equals the maximum number
of people who can be served adequately by a standard fire station.
(c) For the purpose of computing the value "C", the estimated average number of
residents per dwelling unit is 3.27 for single family residences, 2.41 for multi-family units
and 1.96 for mobilehome units.
For the purpose of value "C," the residential categories are defined as follows:
(i) "Single-Family Residence" means a detached or attached unit designed
for occupancy by one family. This category includes both single-family detached
and single-family attached units For all single-family units, the owner has
entitlement to the land on which the unit sits, utility service are independent for
each unit either by open space of by a vertical wall extending from ground to
roof.
(ii) "Multi-Family Unit' means a building designed for occupancy by two or
more families. This category includes duplexes which fail to meet the criteria for a
single-family unit, condominiums for which ownership only applies to the airspace
occupied by the unit, and apartments in which units are not individually owned
and utility services are shared.
(iii) "Mobilehome" means a structure, transportable in one or more sections,
designed to be used as a dwelling unit. This category does not include recreation
vehicles, commercial coaches, or factory-built (modular) housing.
(d) The value "D" is the number 0.76. This number equals the estimated portion,
expressed as a decimal, of the standard fire station needed to provide service to
residential buildings and mobilehomes, as opposed to nonresidential buildings.
DRAFT
(e) The value "E" is the number 2,815,912. This number equals the maximum
square footage of nonresidential building floor space which can be served adequately
by a standard fire station.
SECTION 5. Applying the foregoing values to the subject formula reveals
that the fire protection facilities fee imposed by the Fee Ordinance shall be $979.46 for
each additional single family residence, $721.87 for each additional multi-family unit,
and $587.08 for each additional mobilehome unit and shall be $0.49 for each additional
square foot of floor space added by nonresidential construction.
SECTION 6. Administration Fee. The City shall collect an administration
fee of $15.00 for costs it incurs for the administration of the Fire Protection Facilities
Fee.
SECTION 7. Remittance of Fees to Fire Protection District. The City
Treasurer shall cause the Fire Protection Facilities Fees, collected by the City pursuant
to this Resolution, to be remitted to the Fire Protection District, without interest, on a
semi annual basis.
SECTION 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective sixty
(60) days after its adoption by the Moorpark City Council.
SECTION 9. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution
and shall cause a certified resolution to be filed in the book of original Resolutions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of ,
Patrick Hunter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Deborah S. Traffenstedt, City Clerk
Exhibit "A"
Existing Fire Stations
within
The Facility Fee Zone
(Revised 10-8-07)
Saticoy Fire Station
Fire Station #26 Newbury Park Fire Station
12391 W. Telegraph Rd. Fire Station #35
Santa Paula, CA 93060 2500 W. Hillcrest Dr.
Fillmore Fire Station Newbury Park, CA 91320
Fire Station #27 Oak Park Fire Station
613 Old Telegraph Rd. Fire Station #36
Fillmore, CA 93015 855 N. Deerhill Rd.
Oak Park, CA 91377
Piru Fire Station
Fire Station #28 North Ranch Fire Station
513 N. Church St. Fire Station #37
Piru, CA 93040 2010 Upper Ranch Rd.
Civic Center Fire Station Thousand Oaks, CA 91362
Fire Station #30 Mountain Meadows Fire Station
325 West Hillcrest Dr. Fire Station #40
Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 4185 Cedar Springs St.
Thousand Oaks Fire Station Moorpark, CA 93021
Fire Station #31 Church Street Fire Station
151 Dusenberg Dr. Fire Station #41
Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 1910 Church St.
Potrero Fire Station Simi Valley, CA 93065
Fire Station #32 Moorpark Fire Station
830 So. Reino Rd. Fire Station #42
Newbury Park, CA 91320 295 High Street
Lake Sherwood Fire Station Moorpark, CA 93021
Fire Station #33 Susana Knolls Fire Station
33 Lake Sherwood Dr. Fire Station #43
Thousand Oaks, CA 91361 1262 Cypress St.
Arboles Fire Station Simi Valley, CA 93063
Fire Station #34 Wood Ranch Fire Station
555 Avenida de los Arboles Fire Station #44
Thousand Oaks, CA 91360 1050 Country Club Dr.
Exhibit "A"
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Simi Fire Station
Fire Station #45
790 Pacific Ave.
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Tapo Street Fire Station
Fire Station #46
3265 No. Tapo St.
Simi Valley, CA 93063
Camarillo Airport Fire Station
Fire Station #50
189 Las Posas Rd.
Camarillo, CA 93010
RiverPark Station
Fire Station #51
3302 Turnout Park Cir.
Oxnard, CA 93036
Mission Oaks Fire Station
Fire Station #52
5353 Santa Rosa Rd.
Camarillo, CA 93010
Camarillo Fire Station
Fire Station #54
2160 Pickwick Dr.
Camarillo, CA 93010
Las Posas Fire Station
Fire Station #55
403 Valley Vista Dr.
Camarillo, CA 93010
Malibu Fire Station
Fire Station #56
11777 Ellice St.
Malibu, CA 90265
Somis Fire Station
Fire Station #57
3356 Somis Rd.
Somis, CA 93066
Exhibit "B"
FACILITY FEE SERVICE AREA
That portion of the County of Ventura, State of California, described as follows:
Beginning at the north corner of the Rancho Temescal as shown on the map recorded in
Book A,Page 315 of Patents recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of said
Ventura County; said corner being on the easterly line of Ventura County;thence, along
the westerly line of said Rancho Temescal,
1st- Southwesterly to the east terminus of the 34d'course recited as"North 16°42' 17"
East 36.45 feet..."in Exhibit B in the deed to the United Water Conservation
District recorded in Book 1363,Page 106 of Official Records in the office of the
County Recorder of said Ventura County;thence, along said 34d'course and the
land described in said Exhibit-B in said deed,
2nd- Southwesterly,westerly,northwesterly,southwesterly,southerly,and
southeasterly to the east terminus of the 2"d course recited as"North 76°32' 40"
East 205.90 feet..-"in said Exhibit B in said deed to the United Water
Conservation District recorded in Book 1363,Page 106 of Official Records in the
office of the County Recorder of said Ventura County; said easterly terminus is a
point on the westerly line of said Rancho Temescal;thence,along said westerly
line of Rancho Temescal,
3rd- Southwesterly to the northeast corner of fractional Section 4,Township 4 North,
Range 18 West,San Bernardino Meridian;said northeast corner is on the north
line of said Township 4 North; thence, leaving said westerly line of said Rancho
Temescal and along said north line of said Township 4 North,
4d'- West to a point of intersection with the southeasterly line of the parcel described
in Exhibit"A"in the deed to James F.Brucker and Cathy L. Brucker recorded
June 7,2000 as Document No. 2000-0091355-00 of Official Records in the office
of the County Recorder of said Ventura County; said southeasterly line is recited
as"...North twenty-six(26)degrees East,three(3)chains and fifty(50)links..."
in said deed;thence,leaving said north line of Township 4 North and along said
southeasterly line and along the land described in said deed,
5 t- Northeasterly,northwesterly and southwesterly to a point of intersection with said
north line of Township 4 North;thence, along said north line of said Township 4
North,
6d'- West to the northwest corner of Section 1,Township 4 North,Range 20 West,
San Bernardino Meridian;thence,leaving said north line of said Township 4
North,and along the west line of said Section 1,
Page 1 of 6
2007.061 Facility Fee Service Area--9-I2-2007
7d'- South to the west quarter corner of section 12,Township 4 North,Range 20
West, San Bernardino Meridian;thence,
8th- West to the west quarter corner of Section 11 of said Township 4 North,Range 20
West; thence,along the west line of said Section 11,
9"'- South to the southeast comer of Section 15 of said Township 4 North, Range 20
West;thence,along the south line of said Section 15,
10th- West to the southwest corner of fractional Section 16,Township 4 North,Range
21 West, San Bernardino Meridian;said corner is in the easterly line of Rancho
Ex-Mission Tract No. 1 as shown on the map recorded in Book 2,Page 103 of
Miscellaneous Records in the office of the County Recorder of said Ventura
County;thence, along said easterly line of said Rancho Ex-Mission Tract No. 1,
11th- Northwesterly to the northeast corner of Lot A of said Rancho Ex-Mission,Tract
No.1;thence,along the northerly line of said Lot A,
12th- Southwesterly to the south terminus of the 7th course recited as"South 21°33'
30"East 88.23 feet..."in the deed to Rancho La Questa,LTD.recorded in Book
321,Page 416 of Official Records in the office of the County Recorder of said
Ventura County;thence,along said 7th course and the land described in said Book
321,Page 416 of Official Records,
13th- Northwesterly,southwesterly and southeasterly to the southerly terminus of the
2nd course recited as"North 63°04' 30"West 316.69 feet..."in said deed to
Rancho La Questa,LTD. Recorded in Book 321,Page 416 of Official Records in
the office of the County Recorder of said Ventura County; said southerly terminus
is a point on the northerly line of said Lot A of the Rancho Ex-Mission, Tract No.
1;thence,along said northerly line of said Lot A,
14th- Southwesterly to the northeast corner of Lot H of said Rancho Ex-Mission,Tract
No. 1;thence,along the northerly line of said Lot H,
15th- Southwesterly to the northeast corner of Lot I of said Rancho Ex-Mission, Tract
No. 1;thence,along the northerly line of said Lot 1,
16"- Southwesterly to the point of intersection with the westerly Right-of-Way of
Wheeler Canyon Road;thence,along said westerly Right-of-Way of said Wheeler
Canyon Road,
17"'- Southerly to the point of intersection with the northerly Right-of-Way of Foothill
Road;thence,
along said northerly line of said Foothill Road,
Page 2 of 6
2007-061 Facility Fee service Area-9-12-2007
l e- Southwesterly to the most southerly corner of Parcel 2 as shown on the map
recorded in Book 35,Page 6 of Parcel Maps in the office of the County Recorder
of said Ventura County;thence,
19`h- Southeasterly to the northwesterly terminus of the easterly Right-of-Way of Wells
Road being a point of intersection with the southerly Right-of-Way of said
Foothill Road; thence, along said easterly Right-of-Way of said Wells Road,
20`h- Southeasterly to a point of intersection with the northerly Right-of-Way of
Telegraph Road;thence,along said northerly Right-of-Way of said Telegraph
Road,
210- Northeasterly to the point of intersection with the northwesterly prolongation of
the easterly line of Tract 4544-2,in the City of San Buenaventura,County of
Ventura, State of California,as shown on the map recorded in Book 126,Page 99
of Miscellaneous Records in the office of the County Recorder of said Ventura
County;thence, along said prolongation and the easterly line of said Tract 4544-2,
22nd_ Southeasterly to the southeast corner of said Tract 4544-2;thence,at right angles,
23rd- Northeasterly to the westerly line of Lot 41 of Rancho Santa Paula y Saticoy as
shown on the map recorded in Book A,Page 290 of Patents in the office of the
County Recorder of said Ventura County;thence,along said westerly line of said
Lot 41,
240'- Southeasterly to the northerly terminus of the westerly line of Lot 63 of said
Rancho Santa Paula y Saticoy,thence,along said westerly line of said Lot 63,
25'h- Southeasterly to the point of intersection with the northerly Right-of-Way of
Darling Road;thence, along said northerly Right-of-Way of said Darling Road,
2601- Northeasterly to the point of intersection with the northerly prolongation of the
easterly line of Parcel B as described in the deed to Ventura County Flood Control
District recorded in Book 2397,Page 96 of Official Records in the office of the
County Recorder of said Ventura County;thence,along said prolongation and the
easterly line of said Parcel B,
27'h- Southeasterly to the southeast comer of said Parcel B;thence, along the south line
of said Parcel B,
280i- Southwesterly to the point of intersection with the easterly Right-of-Way of
Campanula Avenue;thence,along said easterly Right-of-Way of said Campanula
Avenue,
Page 3 of 6
2007-061 Facility Foe Service Area—9-12-2007
29th- Southeasterly to the point of intersection with-the northeasterly prolongation of
the southerly line of the land described in Exhibit"A"in the deed recorded
September 20, 1984 as Instrument Number 104939 in the office of the County
Recorder of said Ventura County:thence,along said northerly prolongation and
said southerly line,
30th- Southwesterly to the southeast corner of the land described in said Exhibit"A';
said point being on the westerly Right-of-Way of said Campanula Avenue;
thence,along said westerly Right-of-Way of said Campanula Avenue,
31St- Northwesterly to the most easterly corner of Tract 3353, in the City of San
Buenaventura, County of Ventura, State of California,as shown on the map
recorded in Book 87,Page 49 of Miscellaneous Records in the office of the
County Recorder of said Ventura County;thence,along the southerly line of said
Tract 3353,
32°d- Southwesterly, southeasterly-and southwesterly to the most easterly comer of
Tract 4962-2,in the City of San Buenaventura,County of Ventura, State of
California,as shown on the map recorded in Book 142,Page 38 of Miscellaneous
Records in the office of the County Recorder of said Ventura County;thence,
along the southerly line of said Tract 4962-2,
33rd- Southwesterly to the southeast corner of Tract 4962-1, in the City of San
Buenaventura,County of Ventura, State of California, as shown on the map
recorded in Book 138,Page 30 of Miscellaneous Records in the office of the
County Recorder of said Ventura County:thence, along the southerly line of said
Tract 4962-1,
34'- Southwesterly,northwesterly and southwesterly to the easterly Right-of-Way of
Wells Road(State Route 118); thence,along said easterly Right-of-Way of said
Wells Road(State Route 118),
35th- Southeasterly to the southerly terminus of the easterly Right-of-Way of Wells
Road(State Route 118);said southerly terminus being the northerly terminus of
the easterly Right-of-Way of Los Angeles Avenue(State Route 118);thence,
along the easterly and northerly Right-of-Way of said Los Angeles Avenue(State
Route 118),
36th- Southeasterly,northeasterly and easterly to the point of intersection with the
northerly prolongation of the westerly line of Lot 36 of Rancho Santa Clara del
Norte as shown on the map recorded in Book 3,Page 26 of Miscellaneous
Records in the office of the County Recorder of said Ventura County: thence,
along said northerly prolongation and said westerly line,
Page 4 of 6
2007-061 Facility Fee Scrvice Area-9-12-2007
37a'- Southerly to the most easterly corner of Lot 55 of said Rancho Santa Clara del
Norte;thence,along the southeasterly line of said Lot 55,
38`b- Southwesterly to the most southerly corner of said Lot 55 of said Rancho Santa
Clara del Norte; said corner is a point on the easterly Right-of-Way of Wright
Road;thence,along said easterly Right-of-Way of said Wright Road,
39th- Southeasterly to the point of intersection with the northerly Right-of-Way of
Beardsley Road; thence,along said northerly Right-of-Way of said Beardsley
Road,
40"h- Southwesterly to the point of intersection with the easterly Right-of-Way of
Central Avenue;thence,along said easterly Right-of-Way of said Central Avenue,
41"- Southeasterly to the point of intersection with the southerly Right-of-Way of said
Beardsley Road;thence,along the southwesterly prolongation of said southerly
Right-of-Way of said Beardsley Road,
42od- Southwesterly to the point of intersection with the westerly Right-of-Way of said
Central Avenue;thence,along said westerly Right-of-Way of said Central
Avenue;
43"- Southeasterly to the most northerly corner of Parcel B as described in the Parcel
Map Waiver recorded on June 12, 1989 as Document No. 89-092098 of Official
Records in the office of the County Recorder of said Ventura County;thence,
along the west line of said Parcel B,
44th- Southwesterly to the point of intersection with the northerly Right-of-Way of
State Route 101;thence,along said northerly Right-of-Way of said State Route
101,
45a'- Easterly to the most westerly corner of Parcel"A"described in the deed to the
City of Camarillo recorded in Book 3238,Page 179 of Official Records in the
office of the County Recorder of said Ventura County; thence, leaving said
northerly Right-of-Way of said State Route 101, and at right angles to said
northerly Right-of-Way of said State Route 101,
46d'- South to the southerly Right-of-Way of said State Route 101;thence,along said
southerly Right-of-Way of said State Route 101,
47a'- Easterly to the northeast corner of Parcel 2 described in the Parcel Map Waiver
recorded on May 17, 1995 as Document No. 95-059247 of Official Records in the
office of the County Recorder of said Ventura County;thence, along the easterly
line of said Parcel 2,
Page 5 of 6
2007-061 Facility Fee Service Area—9-12-2007
48''- Southerly and westerly to the point of intersection with the northerly prolongation
of the westerly line of Lot A, Subdivision 55 of Rancho El Rio de Santa Clara
O'la Colonia Map No. 3 as shown on the map recorded in Book 3,Page 12 of
Miscellaneous Records in the office of the County Recorder of said Ventura
County,thence,along said northerly prolongation of said Lot A and westerly line
of said Lot A and its southerly prolongation,
49m- Southerly to the point of intersection with the northerly Right-of-Way of Sturgis
Road; thence, leaving said westerly line of said Subdivision 55 and along said
northerly Right-of-Way of said Sturgis Road,
50m- Easterly to the point of intersection with the easterly Right-of-Way of Pleasant
Valley Road;thence, along said easterly Right-of-Way of said Pleasant Valley
Road,
51"- Northeasterly to the point of intersection with the westerly Right-of-Way of
Wood Road;thence,along said westerly Right-of-Way of said Wood Road,
52"d- Southerly to the point of intersection with the northerly Right-of-Way of State
Route 1 (Pacific Coast Highway);thence,along said northerly Right-of-Way of
said State Route 1 (Pacific Coast Highway),
53rd- Southeasterly and easterly to the point of intersection with the northerly
prolongation of a line at right angles to the west terminus of the course recited as
"S. 830 38' 30"E.,a distance of 341.64 feet..."in the Deed of State Highway in
Book 216,Page 10 of Official Records in the office of the County Recorder of
said Ventura County;thence,along said northerly prolongation,
54`'- Southerly to a point in the Mean High Tide Line of the Pacific Ocean;thence,
along said Mean High Tide Line,
55'h- Easterly and southeasterly to the point of intersection with the Ventura County
Line;thence,along said Ventura County Line,
56th- Northerly,northeasterly,easterly,northerly, easterly,northerly and northwesterly
to the point of beginning.
Disclaimer:for assessment purposes only. This description of land is not a
property description as defined in the Subdivision Map Act and may not be used
as the basis for any claims to real property.
Prepared By:
Ventura County Surveyor's Office
Page 6 of 6
2007-061 Facility Fee Service Area—9-12-2007
��UM' !'C
it 4`:;i
1� >
�
o
bb y Y y
y tai :F:'•::�. [•.
/ �z�a �J•>ac Nr:
i°C
• O to
. t
10
SSA y,t„�...a, t_K d'+ � ° : i % .'rrti �:"•�'-tli':
W
cr
• ^• � O��� t t` L�' ^ ',/ /'' R �� � [.� e � n Yom} � � �s� �4�"Y�� .
i�;3J .n• z A k °n � � ° n'•^.1�jr °-'"¢s{y _°L.
Z��Z4r L�J p .� Y /,ty � •�/•i 5�� ����.
`W ! n n ✓t 4St
vrggr"•+•I'� �3 " � e. 1^#7"yeti [ ,f,•'''h.J w .�•r.3.r:•>
J,3-,'r� Ije"!�\ 4; '• F ;}:�-"T^� ¢'•`{ o:Y�e �Y ,}ic h�'39` '�. t\",:
i, �. r t. °�: - ,��•{�r�i `� s^D.l,'Y'�,li,t �i�•L..�...t •S Z ?'�
�g�tu�T�y�jAt
� 7t,}`r t ` ` f,�i •���T""• �t a1�,F Y::•�� '%;� ✓�7 f tj'��".?°R✓feg6 'h ' i i:.x~��'
T
I c ��t frpl >; wF' Sept } :��+-^T•
� i'.'•. l=�, Y r o 't*i{� 'Svc Ito °\S
uti�i:�i,• M 7 r ids tt
yh{t3,;�
\ .':S ! �t d}'\\tt} '}'l.%ii\r.:!• r 'w + j P.n MI,Qgy
{�
?`+:i�'>!t'+S%-
wC rS'�•` ice' S�4
1y� V,
•y ltl r:�'3rb'}�4> t t' Jf = .,,; 0 4) r f 4� •' ��-<+:
My NIM
w¢ y J -it p 'q,f.:J••� 3H r ate j r S + g .
G•t 1 �i < rat, S`t�c rh:t
^t'. a w ryi 'rjS�L I r lNl ti Fet } i t r y
y\ 4 t �'
r "`irYh tlS}l7' DM E 5 u 3 .Wn y,r G r ♦tr•a, { 4 r k
z t•3s X'F1'ai13 \l \J'- $LL p�Vi �? `,AY4Y F + y t1•J iK Y S•
+ t j:r�4� fjt, 1F[ d (y} A F W•i.2 r t--1+ 'h_\ 1`'1t''1( tSm.
Ry5
go
L. z
, f i y��+1`` F� �C C S h` •rr ci �; ,tt}w�}i•{�rartgf\
•+`- , F X '� a ,�
� t�7r'{r W yt O 6 m�u .e""'M A^ti'tids``�'\eY�.
•+"�.•4,dx,F.[a�y 'j �i'' d p v H w
",f Mti(f i\'V Jar f,{�{ % •r
"f'{ � �"f$,�y[
+rC.t.. iTrtu:• g w t� Z.4-4-7.
�'
y r f�j`�Y t"U o o�' > > ;i b. d
J
t`'�b ut'`��,4r,.••��s���,���^ �•,r?; ��fl'�,-r%• to�"' o�o 'tr,�_ ,�'�y_!;,`>`\:[ ,�; .z.. �•t�.',•
� ,
�lS.A4:t: n n '.L rt`+rr.�1 ;%i�S�e , �} `'� t .•
Wi..r•,-•.rr,.Zle 4.'l)r r � F•; _ a•!tl( fp �.,t 't,.� !t"`-
y v3ffi, 11 Zi�h-.cif/�y*�yl`
[4 6.+•)��.{��1�.�V{ {i9y�'1)S,C lei k41�f�r�V� 'f)I 3'h ��� •�iSt W� \I J Sl�i •!�('V\- t � t
a;l4''f,`,
'_' js_tY `•.,.'-t,'.rf�yl tf4 L�,' ; :i,',•ett'.',4?y'iS t �`..y,:L�S+tvY•k Sr.£,�,' bk: ;�.Vr 4muy�1
r o r [ x �i ytk0.. 4
{�� �.. \, r✓r +1 tt. t r } w O".:
.,aR
•?.. rtkti {\"t`�t c '�':i. q +I-fit �,. ! -t it , r , pt•,fr1 , � a vi:�. -� �.�.1i.. S�